@@archidotsWhat could be more depressing than this house. It is homeless. And it is Architect who make expensive houses only For rent That's the problem. Many young people difficult to buy house and start families and have children .
'Honest' Architect: These Soviet housing units were depressing! Also Honest Architect: The Soviets initiated a massive housing project to combat the huge demand. Schools, grocery stores, and other amenities were within walking distance, and there was ample space for greenery, leisure, and community activities!
These buildings served their purpose. With the current housing crisis and unprecedented levels of homelessness affecting my own country (Australia), I can only dream of a government that cared enough to house its people. Our capitalist hell hole economy doesn't care one bit about taking care of people.
What could be more depressing than this house. It is homeless. And it is Architect who make expensive houses only For rent That's the problem. Many young people difficult to buy house and start families and have children .
Millions of people still live in these houses. Its more space efficient than building cottages (dacha) for all the folk just one of these blocks can house
Soviet mikrodistric vs USA suburbia 0:07 This apartment In reality it is surrounded by trees as high as 30 meters. 0:23 It's strange to call it affordable because no one buys it. Also Soviet government has bigger problem. Moving people from barracks after their homes were destroyed by jerman in World War II to new apartments with running water. 0:29 That's a map of Russia, not the Soviet Union
0:41 In the 1930s, the Soviet Union built a stalinka apartment with a larger size than a kerucovka and made of brick. To this day, houses built during this period are highly valued .But this house is very famous for being close to the factory. The housing crisis did not exist before the war. 1:31 aftrer 1945 50 million people lost their homes and became homeless.Even 2 million houses per year is not enough. 1:38 what amenities What you get from living in the barracks ha!!
Exactly why is it depressing? the design of the USSR is clearly based on supplying basic needs, not luxuries. You should watch the Eco Gecko video, I think it's pretty good and complements your video quite well: /watch?v=k1fFd4S9IBc
What’s more depressing is a dilapidated “luxury” apartment in NYC that costs an arm and a leg each month for rent.
@@archidotsWhat could be more depressing than this house. It is homeless.
And it is Architect who make expensive houses only For rent That's the problem.
Many young people difficult to buy house and start families and have children .
'Honest' Architect: These Soviet housing units were depressing!
Also Honest Architect: The Soviets initiated a massive housing project to combat the huge demand. Schools, grocery stores, and other amenities were within walking distance, and there was ample space for greenery, leisure, and community activities!
A very well presented essay on the topic. Thank you!
These buildings served their purpose. With the current housing crisis and unprecedented levels of homelessness affecting my own country (Australia), I can only dream of a government that cared enough to house its people. Our capitalist hell hole economy doesn't care one bit about taking care of people.
What could be more depressing than this house. It is homeless.
And it is Architect who make expensive houses only For rent That's the problem.
Many young people difficult to buy house and start families and have children .
very informative. thank you for the video !!!
This is such a high quality video good job keep posting
Very good presentation. I see you are using Revit, correct? Keep up the good work!
Millions of people still live in these houses. Its more space efficient than building cottages (dacha) for all the folk just one of these blocks can house
Soviet mikrodistric vs USA suburbia
0:07 This apartment In reality it is surrounded by trees as high as 30 meters.
0:23 It's strange to call it affordable because no one buys it.
Also Soviet government has bigger problem. Moving people from barracks after their homes were destroyed by jerman in World War II to new apartments with running water.
0:29 That's a map of Russia, not the Soviet Union
What’s more depressing:
- Homeless?
- A functional boring house?
0:41 In the 1930s, the Soviet Union built a stalinka apartment with a larger size than a kerucovka and made of brick. To this day, houses built during this period are highly valued .But this house is very famous for being close to the factory. The housing crisis did not exist before the war.
1:31 aftrer 1945 50 million people lost their homes and became homeless.Even 2 million houses per year is not enough.
1:38 what amenities What you get from living in the barracks ha!!
Exactly why is it depressing? the design of the USSR is clearly based on supplying basic needs, not luxuries. You should watch the Eco Gecko video, I think it's pretty good and complements your video quite well: /watch?v=k1fFd4S9IBc
And also, these apartments were for FREE, not even a single penny was to be paid by the citizens, to each and every citizen.
Nice. Subbed
What was depressing about this?
Pretty sure what they had before was a lot more depressing.
1:50So now begins the propaganda part. Like people in the United States like to see people sleeping in the New York subway.
2:37 500 meter not 900