Great comparison. Have you flown in the soup yet? Heavy IFR with rain to really challenge your Mac Mini. Mine crashed when flying a Baron on a short flight in stormy weather.
I have done a "Cat III" into YVR and it was a bit sketchy. Mostly due to the Attitude Indicator being less than accurate. I did it again using the HUD screen and it was light years better.
I still use XP 11 but I use Global TerraFlora which makes the landscape look awesome. I have on med to high settings and I get usually 45 to 50 fps. But I don't use SIM heaven.
Full set up in XP12.1, all mods running, I can get 25 to 30 FPS normally. A few US airports can really draw the graphics down. SFO was complex enough for a good test.
Thanks for the video. Your XP11 is really awesome
“Stadium to the left” is the location of the former Candlestick Park which has been long since demolished.
interesting, i do too once using the vivid sky. IMO, it makes the color of the sea look a bit weird doesn't it? What do you think.
Great comparison. Have you flown in the soup yet? Heavy IFR with rain to really challenge your Mac Mini. Mine crashed when flying a Baron on a short flight in stormy weather.
I have done a "Cat III" into YVR and it was a bit sketchy. Mostly due to the Attitude Indicator being less than accurate. I did it again using the HUD screen and it was light years better.
I still use XP 11 but I use Global TerraFlora which makes the landscape look awesome. I have on med to high settings and I get usually 45 to 50 fps. But I don't use SIM heaven.
As a former X-Plane 11 user, the frame rate appears very low and it can be seen most of the time in the lack of smoothness.
20 FPS, nice.
Full set up in XP12.1, all mods running, I can get 25 to 30 FPS normally. A few US airports can really draw the graphics down. SFO was complex enough for a good test.
which aircraft?
AOA T-6 Texan II
Wow Xplane is horrific performance vs what you see, man they have to get going on actually making this thing run properly. Competition has killed them