Yes - it's amazing that Fender rolling the fingerboard edges is 'a huge upgrade' when Sire have been doing this since the release of their Larry Carlton range, even on the cheapest models. They also have a contoured heel on all of their models.
Yup, Fender finally is trying to get their asses up to speed and it only took like, forever. "Time is Money" and they don't waste much of that on us, their customers aka their Bread and Butter unless of course we are stupidly willing to cough up $2000+ for a still relatively mediocre guitar when Vigier guitars will give you an absolute Dream Gem for about that.
@@bladeoflucatiel My squier bullet mustang is the best guitar ive ever played, not sound wise but im gonna change the pickups, but after a good set up the playability is insane
My biggest takeaway from doing my own video is that the Player II is no longer a “budget guitar” - quality, neck, hardware, pickups - they’re all legit and don’t require upgrading to use. Of course you always could get more out of after-market pickups but they don’t feel 100% required. It’s a real instrument. And now financially it doesn’t make sense to buy a classic vibe squier and mod it. By the time you update everything you’re basically at the cost of this. Big win from Fender for us all!
It’s just their Mexican Strat now. It’s renaming what they were doing before, with a new name and promo campaign, saying this is higher quality. $750-850 new While the Pro is $1350-1439.99. Hopefully the quality control has gotten better, because nearly every foreign made Fender Strat, I’ve tried out for several years, feel and/or sound bad. Some I can feel it, and not even plug it in, because I know it’s not going to stay in tune, and/or the frets are so jagged, that I don’t even want to play it if it did .
@@CorbCorbin yeah same here. I’ve avoided entry level fenders in the past - fret sprout, dry fretboards, neck pocket cracking, etc. I’ve played a few Strats, teles and jazzmasters in this line so far and all of them have been a cut above what the player I series was, hands down. Time will tell if the quality stays up, but so far I’ve been impressed. And I’m just a random dude trying things out - no paid sponsorships or anything like that. I’ve got some custom shops and some American Fenders, so I like the brand and hope that they can keep these instruments solid because it’s really nice having an entry level that’s actually a joy to play.
Not only is it not required, but the value tradeoff of upgrading isn't as much. Where before a neck or pickup replacement would be about $100-$300 and grant a 50% increase in tone/playability/etc., now you're looking at a 5% or 10% increase max. So now buyung upgrades is gonna take an extra consideration of deciding whether you REALLY love that guitar to an extent where you're willing to invest chunks of cash just to provide a marginal performance benefit. Because now, that money could be saved to invest in a whole new guitar which would provide a lot more variety to your playing options. Of course, if you have enough guitars and fell in love with your strat's colorway/design/playability, then perhaps investing small chunks over time could be what you want. It's just it won't be night and day, and while the tone/comfort may be better, you might feel like it's nearly imperceptible and maybe even more of a sidegrade than an upgrade.
@@spawn302 more of a Gibson player. Did upgrade a Squier Sonic with about $600 in parts(I actually have a specific reason for a couple of the parts) or so, but that’s largely because I don’t get along with standard size Strats(thickness didn’t fit my body right). I am building a custom off a Player Tele body, and the one major complaint I have is that the Fender neck profile doesn’t sit well with my hand. If I bought a Player II Tele, I would have had to order a custom neck(probably around $350-$600) just to be able to play it. My ideal neck is a thin, asymmetrical neck with a 12” Straight radius in Gibson Scale, with a Tusq XL nut. Out of the guitars I own, my Epi LP Classic Worn has the best playing neck. I already do pickup swaps automatically because I have a preferred sound, always a Super Distortion derivative in the bridge, and the other pickup/s depend on the guitar, but typically ceramics or Alnico IIs.
@@bradleyolinger1691 I dunno man, I have a squier contemporary jazzmaster, made in us fender strat, strandberg, ibanez, ive never had a neck I NEEDED in order to play it. To each his own
Not sure this is a useful comparison unless you only buy from Sweetwater. That pink guitar is not am pro ii specs, am pro ii have 2 points terms, string trees, back plates, no clay dots, vmod pickups, etc. this is just a big Sweetwater commercial
they do, BUT I have an American Vintage 2 in Fiesta Red that looks AMAZING and pretty much is, but the side clay dots are damn near invisible against the rosewood. I have a hard time seeing them on a dimly lit stage, even in my studio is the light is lower its hard to see. Never realized in over 40 plus years of playing how much I depend on the side dots!! I may put some white our or something on them its actually that bad.
@@brianseneca3546 wait... the side dots are also clay coloured? yikes, i can see that becoming a problem fairly quickly. you can buy a lume kit for watchmaking depending on your situation. it's classier than dot stickers. it'll be off-white in the day, still brighter than clay dots, and then glow in darker situations. just a thought.
@@marcaustin Absolutely. They really do a great job of recreating vintage tone and adding some new dimensions as well which are perhaps more suitable to modern playing. You can really shape a wide variety of sounds. I can't imagine that I'd ever consider swapping them out on this guitar.
Player, player II, pro, pro II, heck even some classic vibes if you play enough of them you'll find a good, even great one in any series. If your a modder it doesn't really even matter much at all. One of my favorite guitars I own is a modded player 1 tele. I have ultras, elites, a sweet mod shop, even a broadcaster but I always go for my players series. The player 1 came with a paufaero fret board which to me feels alot more like ebony, which I personally like better than rosewood. One of the best necks I own came on a squier classic vibe that is absolutely full of flame and has the best rolled edges I've felt on a neck. So my point is try as many as you can, you may like the feel of one better than a more expensive model or the sound out if one you wouldn't have even thought to consider. At the end of the day price doesn't mean a guitar will fit you better and the folks that build guitars in Mexico take the same pride in what they do just like the USA guys do. Just find a good one and the more you play it the better it will feel to you. A guitar doesn't have to break the bank to be a great instrument. Hard work and practice is far more important to make any guitar sound great than a price tag.
The Player One Strat is excellent. Rolling a fretboard is a pretty simple task. I have 7 Fender Custom Shop guitars and my Player One is better than any of them when it comes to soloing. I have no idea what this guy is complaining about.
True, my Player 1 from april this year also came with really smooth fret edges, so I guess they improved the quality of mexican fenders in general (the fretwork is still far from perfect, but definitely playable in recommended factory setup).
Sonically the sound a lot closer than I would have expected. The American Pro II has a little bit more sparkle especially high up the neck during the "Shine on You, Crazy Diamond" but for the money the Player II is actually a pretty good value.
In this video audio....I can't hear the price difference between the Player ii Alnico 5s, and the Am Pro II CS Fat 60s. Yeah back to back here, the AM Pro's CS's have a bit more roundness. But put either of these guitars in a typical "garage/jam" band scenario. And I bet you couldn't hear a difference.
I’ve owned many American strats. I own an American Eric Clapton strat and it’s incredible. But for kicks I bought a fender players surf green with a roasted maple neck it came with fat 50s custom shop pups. It sounds and plays awesome. So I believe I have two great fenders.
That Pro II sounds incredible, but for $800 bucks that Player II is a steal. I didn’t notice that much of a difference with an untrained ear. I’d swap out the nut to bone as you suggested on that Player II and maybe locking tuners as I’m a lazy string changer and that’s it. Great vid Rhett. I will say the Pro II in Olympic White via Sweetwaters site is the one I’d lock down if I was in the market for a new Start, but my wife has crushed that dream😎
For exactly this reason I changed my mind about replacing the standard tuners as well,@@blackfrancis33. When string replacement is done correctly, locking tuners don't offer that much advantage in terms of tuning stability. In fact, I had replaced standard tuners for Kluson locking ones on a semi-hollow and found little to almost zero difference. There are many other aspects of guitar setup that come before when talking about tuning accuracy and stability. When all these are understood and embraced the need for locking tuners disappears where I'm concerned.
I have an ‘02 MIM HSS Strat. If I were to buy a new Strat today I would still go with the Player Series. From the countless videos I’ve seen comparing the levels of guitars, the Players sound just as good as the American or Custom shops. Get it set up, put some quality strings on there and just do your thing.
Underrated comment A DECENT setup, is the MOST important thing. With any electric guitar of any price range. Who the hell plays an electric guitar out-of-the-box? ...Other than youtube guitar reviewers....
@@Mexxx65 good shout - although that being said the local guitar center where I see a lot of people buy guitars (especially beginners) has a backlog of a month on setups - there are lots of players who don’t set up a new guitar either thinking they shouldn’t have to or not even knowing it’s a thing. Different brands are definitely more playable out of the box and others. For instance, a PRSI wouldn’t worry about a set up in most circumstances. It’s kind of cool to see fender just putting a little bit more care and attention into what they’re shipping out of the factory.
@@dadtimejamtime True, but I think still think its hit or miss with MIM/Fenders. A decent seutp to your specs/settings is paramount for any player of any level.
I appreciate the fact that Fender has finally listened to their customers and added some improvements to their lowest Fender labeled line. But like one commenter below, i think they're looking over their shoulders at the improving value market competitors gaining ground in the quality of their products. Without naming any names, I recently purchased a guitar with a roasted maple neck, locking staggered tuners, bone nut, rosewood fingerboard, ball end stainless steel frets, solid mahogany body EXTREMELY good quality and more for about half the price of a Player or Player ll. The neck alone, if it had Fender on the headstock, would sell for $699. I think the Player and now the Player ll were and are still the best bang for your buck Fenders, but watch out.....the competition is gaining.
The American having no string tree is most likely due to the American having staggered tuners. (Lowering the angle of the strings without needing a tree)
Oh I didn't see this comment earlier. Yeah, even from the close ups in this video you could see the Am Pro IIs staggered 3 long/ 3 short (non-locking apparently) tuners. Negating the need of any string trees.
The standard issue American Pro II in my possession absolutely DOES have a string tree. I'm guessing that the absence in Rhett's guitar has to do with the fact that it's a Sweetwater spec
It's interesting you think the 6 screw bridge is an upgrade. I've been a loooong time since I've owned one but all my plus and ultra guitars from the 90s have the two point and that has just always felt way more precise to me than the 6 screw ones (yeah I know you can unscrew half the screws and do little tricks to make it feel different). My biggest issue with Fender is they just have so many options that don't make sense to me. Do people still like the old school rolled saddles? Do you have to upgrade to the next model just to get the more boxy saddles that don't hurt your hand as much? I've always felt like Fender needs 4 lines, an intro American made guitar, a more premium guitar, and ultra style guitar and then a retro guitar. Instead they have around 10 models that make it really confusing. Since none of these modern guitars will ever hold their value, I'm more inclined to just buy parts online from Stratosphere or Stigatsu and make the one you really want. I dunno, Fender is one of my favorite companies but the way they try to market the same guitar drives me crazy.
This is why free market competition is good kids! Definitely a response to how good the Silver Sky SE was.. probably why rosewood was brought back to the mexican line as well!!
I was not even considering buying a new Strat but thanks to your live stream, I saw the Shell Pink Strat with all the additional features and bought one. Amazing guitar! On sale now for about 20% off. Thanks, Rhett and Sweetwater!
A few weeks ago I bought a Fender vintera 2 60s stratocaster in Olympic white mint pickguard after a fresh set of strings and setup it's a great Stratocaster it's better than some other higher American made ones I tried. Best 899 I ever spent my money is in my amps
Always fun to watch, but a fair number of details are either slightly off or inadvertently misleading. Player II kept a lot of specs from Player I, including the same pickups. Biggest changes are the return of rosewood from pau ferro (indian laurel is what you find on recent squiers), lightly rolled fingerboards, some hardware upgrades (tuners), several new colors, and apparently slightly better QC going by early reports. Meanwhile, the "American Professional II" shown here is a limited run GT11 series done by Sweetwater, which costs a couple hundred more and has completely different specs than the original American Professional II, so it's kind of a strange comparison. The GT11 is Sweetwater's attempt to port over their custom shop specs to a more affordable line. They seem like great guitars, but all the specs and hardware choices are subjective. Regular Am Pro II has a 9.5" radius "deep C" neck, compared to GT11 with an 11" radius "60s C"; Pro II has 2-point trem, GT11 has 6 point; Am Pro II has normal dots, normal maple neck, normal Fender string tree, while GT11 has clay dots, roasted maple neck, no string tree (staggered post tuners); Pro II has V-Mod II pickups, GT11 has Custom Shop 60s pickups; both have the same push/push pot to activate neck pup; GT11 comes in a handful of vintage colors on alder bodies, whereas Am Pro II has way more color options, with alder on most and roasted pine for natural and sienna transparent finishes. (Personally, I don't need the GT11 upgrades and love my pine-bodied Am Pro II.) All in all, the Player II series seems like a solid upgrade and a good value compared to the reasonably nice but overpriced Vintera II line. Am Pro II in original form or GT11 is a definite step up and still a good value, with an incredible neck, much nicer pickups, and all-around great specs and features for a modern strat.
I love my Player II. Love your vids, but I think you need to check your info on the Player II. There is no change to the pups on the SSS Player II, per Fender. It's also the same trem as the Player 1. I have both, and the 70th Anni Player sitting right here. The changes for this model as I understand it are only these: Rolled FB edges, Rosewood option & split shaft classic gear tuners. The necks & fretwork on all 3 of my Players is really nice. All are 2024 models, which may make a difference. The QC on my Player 1 could have been a bit better though. My Player II & 70th are flawless.
Rhett is correct about Fender Stratocasters not receiving proper quality control. I had to to exchange my 2021 Pro II five times to get a nice one. If you look inside a lot of Pro II bodies, you can see how careless they can be over at Fender.
Rhett, this was my favorite playing of yours I've heard for feeling, technique, and tone. I really appreciate that you played music, as opposed to the meandering noodling one hears on the vast majority of review videos. The Player II gave the Pro a genuine run for its money, even with the stock pickups on the Player II. The upgrades on the Player II are phenomenal for the money.
My Player II Strat (in Birch green like the one Rhett has) came to me from Sweetwater with the nut slots cut too shallow. I had a luthier fix that for $60.00. Sweetwater reimbursed me for that repair (I consider this a completion, not a repair) which is cool. I just don't think Fender was ever made aware and that irks me. Anyway, now this Strat plays awesome and I really love it. Cheers!
Many manufacturers cut their slots a bit shallow in order for the buyer to complete their preferred setup with a luthier. For whatever reason this is never explained. Still, the guitar should be close when it leaves the factory.
You helped me make up my mind . I was real curious about these new player2's. They already sound and feel better than my player 1 just by the various videos and reviews. Thank you very much!
I spent a couple years off and on wanting to find a Tele that felt good, but everything I tried short of custom shop did not make me smile and often made me bleed the fret work was so bad. Ended up with a Reverend Greg Koch signature T-Style with roasted maple neck, locking tuners, brass saddle that makes me smile every time my hands caress that neck.
My take on these Fender models I go with the Made in USA and higher end Professional II model due to they are offered at the moment for $1600 at GC and at Sweetwater vs $800 for a Player II model ... They are both offered with 48 month payment plan with no interest. So that means for $34/month you can have a Pro II Strat and then you do not need to fiddle with swapping the pickups, changing the nut and adding a push/push circuit, plus you'll end up with a USA Fender vs MIM one... Plus if you want to compare apples to apples, remember you'll need to add a $230 expense to get a hard case for the Player II... That makes your $800 guitar $1030...while your Pro II comes with that case. So the real difference is $570... And for that reason I choose Pro II all day long! I know, at first, it feels too much to pay $1600 for a Strat but again in my case it was only $34/month payment while I am enjoying a really cool instrument. I am not a pro or on stage ever. I am a 66 yr old guitarist who plays to bug his wife and two little dogs when the mood strikes. I don't even have friends to jam, so thanks to Online Free Guitar Backing Tracks + my iPad & JBL wireless speaker, I make my own "poor man's band" and enjoy myself for hours and hours at times. IMHO that's the most fun you can have for $34/month!
I tried a couple of Player II Strats and although they do have better necks, they seem to have weaker tone to me. However, I also tried the Player II Teles and those sound incredible. Also, in a rare case where I agree with the upcharge, I tried both the Player II Strat and Tele with chambered ash or mahogany bodies, and the altered woods really brought more of both guitars to life!
Player II has exactly the same pickups as Player I. That is a fact confirmed by the Fender dealer. And you will not find anywhere Fender say anything about "upgrading" the pickups on these models. Rosewood, fingerboard and new colors are super nice though. They are basically the same guitar a Fender American standard used to be some 15 years ago.
Am Pro IIs all have the push push S1 switch that adds the neck pickup. They also normally come with a 9.5" radius, not 11" unless that was a Sweetwater specification.
The 11 inch radius is a Sweetwater exclusive thing. They do it on their custom spec’d GT11 which is an incredible looking guitar in the chrome blue finish.
Sounds amazing, much better than the previous gen (I do like the AlniCo5s though). The Gibson QC problem vs the Fender? True, Fender might have a few slips here and there but their modular design is a great advantage. Look at this very example, you did not like the pickups in that Player II? well- there is a large market of special parts to choose from and you know you can easily find something to your taste. So does everyone else when choosing a Fender or Squier even. These things are made to be modded and adjusted to each player's preferences. Not so with the Gibsons- sure, you can change parts on those as well- but it's not a huge aftermarket out there, and people tend to judge- oh a Gibson with switched pups.. desecrated etc. Nobody bats an eyelash over a swapped pickup set in a Fender/Squier. There are always good, very good and excellent options- and if the potential SH buyer does not like what the seller did to the guitar, they can easily change it back - even to stock specs if so desired- without too much effort or money.
He's so certain about the pickups... needing to swap pups in the player. But there's really not much between them. The yosemite pickups were absolutely used on custom shop strats before they landed in the player II series They both sound great.
Mr. Shull, I think the player 2 really put the pro to shame in this video and settings, I loved the Kenny Wayne Shepherd sound you had going very unique very awesome. Don’t know if anybody else recognized it but I sure did. Close to 45 years of searching for the right sound, and I loved the sound of the player 2 , I almost think I was supposed to, we hear our own playing and sound that we want better so badly we mess it up, the truth is we get bore, tiered of listening to ourselves if this video is accurate, I wouldn’t give $10 extra for the pro. thank you for a nice video and nice chords. Enjoyed the sound.
I don’t get the fuss about rolled edges. Just makes it easier for the string to fall off the edge during aggressive playing. I’ll take normal edges thanks.
Glad to hear the Players are given more attention to detail and consumers desires as far as most of the specs. I was surprised by how noticeable the difference was between these two great guitars for their price point.
Thanks for the review Rhett. I was about to pull the trigger on a Pro II GT11. But my wife is battling cancer, so it’s just not a good time to spend $2K as much as I would like to. Adulting sucks! This review was very helpful and it nudged me over the edge. I’m most likely gonna get a graph tech nut, and a loaded DG pickguard from 920D, It’s gonna come in at a grand and some change, so thats a bit more doable. After this, I feel much better about the purchase. Thanks for hitting all the high points. As soon as I’m done here I’m placing my order. So SW owes you one. Thanks again man.
I have to say the Player II pickups sounded great through headphones. I'm sure there was more of a difference in the room, but both guitars came across really well with RUclips audio quality.
I was glad the see the changes. Swapping for better pickups is simple and relatively inexpensive, but changing the nut, oof. Unless you've done it a few times and are good at it, it's a bit of work, and then the filing and always looking at it thinking you could've done better is annoying. I don't know how much it costs to have a pro do it, but I imagine it will be more than a few dollars. I'd probably stick with plastic nut.
Both of them sound surprisingly really great. I think the player sounds a bit thinner and has more twang, but the pro also sounds really nice with it's fatter sound.
one key point I think needs to be addressed is that the AMPro II is a special run for Sweetwater only with 11" radius fretboard, as one point of difference. SO, this is not a "regular" off the shelf Pro II
Nice shoot out! I think Fender had better listened as they're seeing lots of competition from really high quality copies of the Fender-Strat build by Japanese, Indonesian, South Korean and Chinese manufacturers. E.g. I got myself a Squier Deluxe from Indonesia, did some mild mods and today it can really stand its ground against similar models three times the original budget, except Sire's Strat series. To me, their quality in build and sound kick all competitors in that price range right out of the ball park, that's how great their products are IMHO.
chose a Larry Carlton Sire over the player Strat. Glad I did. Cheaper and has all the bells and whistles, rolled fret board edges, American alder, bone nut etc.
Hey Rhett! The Player 1 and Player 2 has the same pickups on the strats. The official fender website says Player Series Alnico 5 Strat® Single-Coil pickups for both player 1 and 2. And when they made a comparison they even said that they are the same. The two saddle bridge is the same too. I agree tho it looks and feels much nicer and the tuners are better as well... But yeah I think it's worth correcting and pointing out because player 1 is much cheaper now used and it makes a difference for most people... And they should know that some features stayed the same;) peace!❤
Respect for the honest opinion. So many great guitars around for around £1000 now, it makes playing so much more enjoyable now without pimping out your Granma 😄
The Player 2 and the Pro 2 both sounded great, yes the Pro 2 pickups were lovely. Nice rounded sound. I actually loved the look of the Player 2 I’d love either. But I’d certainly go for the cheaper one obviously. But to get all the upgrades the Pro 2 has without need to either do this myself or visit a luthier to do the work has a certain convenience. I don’t necessarily think there is a better or worse, a right or wrong. There is simply one is obviously going to be different. Btw I loved both colours, but my favourite as far as looks are concerned is the Player 2.
100% agree about the crummy fret work on player I strats and teles. I seriously played dozens of them in guitar stores and hated every one of them. At least they were consistent. But, I also don’t love how low the player I frets are. Not really my jam. And this is from someone that gets on ok with genuine vintage fender frets. Note, I didn’t say I loved vintage frets, just that if I’m buying a new guitar, my preference is for something like the so called ‘narrow tall’ frets fender uses on a lot of other guitars. Final thought, I don’t think fender listens to their customers one bit, I think they noticed people buying less expensive T and S style guitars and then not looking back. I’m close to pulling the trigger on a non fender S body myself.
I tried one, and they're definitely much better than the old Player series. Before, I did get a Squier Classic Vibe and upgrade it, for my second Strat. And I have a Vintera as my first Strat. But, don't forget tthe Vintera II. It's closer in price to the Player II, and I like them better in almost every way. In particular, the pickups are better, and I also prefer the more classic outfit & colours. I also prefer the Vintera II to the performer, for the same reason. Iif you can stretch the budget, by the time you upgrade the Player II, for the money, may as well have bought the better Vintera II. Player II vs Vintera II is the more relevant comparison, for most people. It's a big leap up to the Performer, and maybe for not that much gain _unless_ you are set on a Made in USA guitar. But honestly, is there really any meaningful difference? The older Player basses are nice, have an old Player Jazz Bass as my second bass. It has a maple neck and it's actually damn good. I replaced the bridge for a high-mass, upgraded the pickups to Lollars, and did some light work myself on the neck and frets. Was pretty easy and didn't cost that much to bring it up to the level of my main Vintera II P Bass. But with better Lollar pickups and bridge, and costing about 200 less. And in the buttercream finish, it's a stunning Jazz Bass with a good weight.
This is your best video yet, Rhett. I too dislike the AlNiCo 5 magnets - too harsh-sounding, whilst the AlNiCo 3s are too slow and sluggish-sounding. To my ears, the AlNiCo 2s are the just-right-sounding, ‘Goldilocks’ of magnets. 👱🏼♀🧲👌🏻
I find it interesting how mid-range instruments compared to high-end ones in terms of sonority, high-end ones tend to have a clearer mid-range, regardless of whether they are brighter or duller, in several videos including this one I see the same difference, the Player II has some strange harmonics in the 500-800 Hz area while the Americana is cleaner, it is not an abysmal difference, but in the mix it makes things much easier.
Uhm that's the pickups. I bet he didn't even set equal height. People put they're pickups wherever and claim a difference in sound that vanishes once you use a set of calipers to adjust height. You cannot even measure it in a scientific analysis beyond the margin of error.
If they put a maple neck on that Player II series I'd probably buy one immediately. Sonically... I thought it was very close and can easily be improved with new pickups. That birch green color is unreal! Love it.
The regular non-GT11 Pro Am II Strat also has the push-push Tone knob to add neck pup. (I'm buying a GT11 as soon as Sonic Blue is back in stock. I was sold before this vid though. :) )
For a Nashville vibe cat like you , that Shine on your crazy diamonds hommage is pure class , and the primal reason why Strat sound gets directly into my soul. I'm taljing about the player one off couse . Thank you for this content
My only question is, since you're getting the guitar from Sweetwater, aren't they giving you the best possible version of the guitar and not just the random one off the wall?
@RhettSchull, aside from the colors in this year’s Player II options, the one reason I didn’t buy a Player II is the neck itself. For whatever reason, Fender necks, and the 9.5” radius, do not suit my hands. I have that on my Sonic Strat(heavily modded otherwise). I was able to pick up a Player I Tele body only(Tidepool), and am going to get a custom neck to better fit my hand. My Epi Les Paul Classic has a great asymmetrical, thinner neck with a 12” straight radius I love, so going with a custom neck. Going to also do a P90 in the neck and Super Distortion T in the bridge with a coil tap option and individual tone/volume controls(due to the hotter pickups I want a bit more control than the standard Tele setup) using concentric pots. I think the Player/Player II series are ideal for the player that prefers to make the guitar their own.
I agree with you regarding the fret work, or lack thereof, on the first Player series. I bought one used and had to file the fret edges before I could comfortably play the guitar. For the price of the original player series, it was very disappointing that Fender sold these guitars with such rough fret edges.
Biggest thing left for me would be stainless steel frets.. I build strats just to mainly get stainless, but it's nice to be able to upgrade parts upfront too
I really dug into this. Fender themselves said they felt the player series alinico v were great and didn't need any change while they tried others , "we decided the player series was best with what we had on the player one"....Maybe not word for word but it's in a video fender themselves posted.
@@robertclarkguitar Fender could have easily.....dropped in some Noiselss pickups from the old Player Plus. Then that WOULD have been a worthwhile upgrade over the Player 1!!
The pink one has a bit of a warmer sound. The green one a bit more sharp tone. Hard to tell to much from the demo. I would go with the green one in a maple neck if offered that way.
I've got a player 1 plus top pau ferro and like it. Tried out a player 2 and yes the rosewood looks nice and the rolled edges are great but that's about it! The pickups are the same as on player 1 and are not an upgrade apart from the cream coloured pickup covers and knobs. As for the 2 point trem bridge and saddles are also the same as on the player 1 and are not an ugrade. However what I have noticed that the neck thickness feels consistently slimmer than that on the player 1 with pau ferro that I played in various shops and compared between the two! The other thing I noticed that the pau ferro has a little bit more snap compared to the rosewood fretboard that sounds darker, the feel between the 2 fretboards is pretty much the same if you can get past the name of the pau ferro. More expensive guitar makers use pau ferro on their guitars because of it's tone, even the SRV customshop strat has a pf fretboard.
I have a Player I Stratocaster (a secon hand one), the Buttercream color (maple fretboard), originally born with HSS that I totaly swapped (the whole pickguard and pots and so on...) with one classic SSS with Lace Sensor pickups. I've got several Vintera Series Stratocaster, and despite the fact I prefer the 7.25 radius over the 9.5, I usually use this Player I for recording. I really love the neck of that guitar. On frets, You are right: they were horrible, I had to bring to my local luthier to get rectified and set to dignity. It's the only complain I had on that Player I Series. For the price I paid (500 euros in Italy) it's an awesome guitar. I didn't check out the Player II yet but I'm eager to try the one with tonal chambers in Transparent Cherry Burst. Might be my next one...🤪
Wow…..great vid Rhett! I always adjust, modify, tweak, add to, take away from, alter, trash, start over, constantly learn, fail, learn again, experiment, succeed, fail again, learn again on all of my guitars ( except on my Martin HD 35…just a few minor tweaks, added a pickup system, and that baby is being allowed to blossom on it’s own, and it is! ) That being said, I immediately noticed a huge difference in the sound of both guitars. The green one, although it sounded good, it almost seemed as if each string was competing for top billing. There was a total lack of unity in the sound. The pink one? There was still a lot of focus on the main notes being played, but there was an overall unity in the sound. It just felt warmer, smoother, and left me wanting to hear more. I totally agree with your assessment…….put some better pickups on that green guitar, and it will be something to be cherished. But now…..that push-pull pot to bring in the neck pickup……hmmmmm. Guess what I will be experimenting with tomorrow?!
Maybe the reason the fit and finish is as good as it is could have something to do with Sweetwater setting the guitars up before they sent them. They have a 50+ point fit and fettle check and adjust that they do. The Pro II has a 9.5" radius IIRC and isn't $1200 more than the player. Maybe it was that if you bought from Sweetwater but the Pro II has been going for $1599 for some time on the Fender website.
Loved this video. The PRO definitely sounds better, the pickups are richer, more balanced and more pleasant. It feels as if perhaps you can tweak your tone slightly better for the Player but I can't imagine you'll reach the same depth of tone you get with the PRO. The PRO is much more expensive tho. This was a good video.
I went and checked them out when they hit the stores, and I wrote a little review for FB - I personally concluded they were a big improvement on the player I, and I have 2 player 1's. I 100% agree with 1's poor fretwork, and the neck makes the player 2. I said this makes Fender a serious player the 750 to 1000 mkt again (especially with Sire's QC really falling off based on feedback). I also said I wouldn't buy another Player, if I were buying I'd move up to MIJ. Then five days later I bought a player 2 tele. And I haven't put it down. If I were buying another strat, I would still go up series, but i do not like ashtray bridges, and the 2 really checked all the boxes. And I bought the one I'd had time to play on, so I knew what I was getting.
The only thing you got wrong was the bridge is the same 2 point with the same saddles on the player 1 & 2. Phillip McKnight shows that it’s the same bridge in his American fender
Can you imagine being like "Hey Sweetwater, send me those Fenders". Dang man, you worked hard and you are living the dream for real. You have a huge studio, you have all the gear you want. What life God has blessed you with. You're a cool guy, I wouldn't mind jamming with you and having a couple glassed of Old Grandad.
Rhett really likes vintage guitars and rolled fingerboards. Basically a broken in feel is a top factor for him. What I find most interesting with his guitar shootouts is he tends to omit the entry level American “standard” version of instruments.
yeah, for me Rhett lost all his credibility long time ago, the guy just doesn't have good ear or taste for a good tone... he is the only youtuber I saw trash talking the Player I series
Awesome video which was very informative. I have the American Pro I series and the American Performer series and love them both. This video you made just helped me make my decision on buying a new Player Series. I just purchased it in yellow and should be here in a few days. Thank you for your video and you sound amazing, your a very talented guitarist and play amazing.
I have 2010 MIM lone star strat, two fender Texas special single coils and a Seymour Duncan pearly gates humbucker , came stock in it. I love it! With that said I’ll def be adding the push / pull tone knob for the neck pickup mod. So thanks for sharing!!
Sorry for the long reply! I respect Rhett's honesty, but it feels disingenuous to say all Player series are "lesser" than other models. The real problem with the line has always been finding a great one is hard. It means playing the lottery - if you don't have high volume music store locally and the time/patience, chnaces are you settle for the one that's there. He mentioned that they have been getting better over time, and I would agree. My first Player was a year one P Bass that is frankly horrible (sold), and then a Player Mustang that wasn't much better (returned) - both had a culmination of tiny annoyances and issues that started to appear when you looked closer. Bummer! Early last year my opinion did a 180. I grabbed a variant of a Player Strat with factory upgrades, a roasted maple neck (amazing factory rounded edges and impeccable fretwork), Fat 50s pickups, and a beautiful sea foam green finish. It was during a Fender promotion, so it cost $100 CAD more than the base model. After doing some upgrades, a term/bridge, a bone nut, locking tuners, the result is an early 60s inspired, modern feeling , "players, working guitar". It rivals both of my American Strats; a 2004 HSS American Standard bought new and a 2015 American Vintage 65 bought used in 2017 that has since sold. I never loved either of those, and chose this Player over dozens of America models played over a few months span. The Player series are guitars that have a higher variance in fit, finish, and tone than someone who is willing to spend a few grand should stomach. My guess is prpduction volume, which is why the limited run version all seem to be better guitars. Some really do end up being better than others, sadly significantly less than what has been coming off the American assembly line. Glad to hear the Player II are bucking that trend, so more people get guitar they love and can afford.
I definitely prefer the pick ups in the player two Strat. They are clearer and more articulate. The pick ups in the standard pro are smoother, but they lack a little bit of that articulation and chime
On the Strat Player II, the specs say it has a synthetic bone nut (i.e. plastic). On an $800 guitar, they can't afford to use a bone nut? How much is a bone nut, $8-$10 retail?
Regarding the overall tones, the Player II sounds exactly what I expect regarding the "Strat sound", it's so good. Otherwise, the American Pro seems a bit more "balanced" to me and with a sort of "modern" sound, in my opinion.
I've owned both these models pro 2 & player 2 MIM ; your description is spot on. The performer series is cool too. I like hhs ones the best. For the low noise & high gain. U do loose some of trademark spank.
I’ve got a GT11 and it plays and sounds different than the Pro Am II. It’s also more expensive unfortunately, but I love mine. It’s too bad you didn’t do a straight comparison per your video title.
Love My Fender Player Series 1 FSR - Roasted Maple Neck - 2 Point trem - Custom Shop Fat 50's all stock - Paid 5 Bills New! Search em out!! Fiesta Red.
The overseas competitors finally made them step up their game.
@@daxmoore2060 100%
Yes - it's amazing that Fender rolling the fingerboard edges is 'a huge upgrade' when Sire have been doing this since the release of their Larry Carlton range, even on the cheapest models. They also have a contoured heel on all of their models.
A 100 bucks squier is as good as a MIM strat from 10 years ago.
Yup, Fender finally is trying to get their asses up to speed and it only took like, forever. "Time is Money" and they don't waste much of that on us, their customers aka their Bread and Butter unless of course we are stupidly willing to cough up $2000+ for a still relatively mediocre guitar when Vigier guitars will give you an absolute Dream Gem for about that.
@@bladeoflucatiel My squier bullet mustang is the best guitar ive ever played, not sound wise but im gonna change the pickups, but after a good set up the playability is insane
My biggest takeaway from doing my own video is that the Player II is no longer a “budget guitar” - quality, neck, hardware, pickups - they’re all legit and don’t require upgrading to use. Of course you always could get more out of after-market pickups but they don’t feel 100% required. It’s a real instrument. And now financially it doesn’t make sense to buy a classic vibe squier and mod it. By the time you update everything you’re basically at the cost of this. Big win from Fender for us all!
It’s just their Mexican Strat now.
It’s renaming what they were doing before, with a new name and promo campaign, saying this is higher quality.
$750-850 new
While the Pro is $1350-1439.99.
Hopefully the quality control has gotten better, because nearly every foreign made Fender Strat, I’ve tried out for several years, feel and/or sound bad.
Some I can feel it, and not even plug it in, because I know it’s not going to stay in tune, and/or the frets are so jagged, that I don’t even want to play it if it did .
@@CorbCorbin yeah same here. I’ve avoided entry level fenders in the past - fret sprout, dry fretboards, neck pocket cracking, etc. I’ve played a few Strats, teles and jazzmasters in this line so far and all of them have been a cut above what the player I series was, hands down. Time will tell if the quality stays up, but so far I’ve been impressed. And I’m just a random dude trying things out - no paid sponsorships or anything like that. I’ve got some custom shops and some American Fenders, so I like the brand and hope that they can keep these instruments solid because it’s really nice having an entry level that’s actually a joy to play.
Not only is it not required, but the value tradeoff of upgrading isn't as much. Where before a neck or pickup replacement would be about $100-$300 and grant a 50% increase in tone/playability/etc., now you're looking at a 5% or 10% increase max.
So now buyung upgrades is gonna take an extra consideration of deciding whether you REALLY love that guitar to an extent where you're willing to invest chunks of cash just to provide a marginal performance benefit. Because now, that money could be saved to invest in a whole new guitar which would provide a lot more variety to your playing options. Of course, if you have enough guitars and fell in love with your strat's colorway/design/playability, then perhaps investing small chunks over time could be what you want. It's just it won't be night and day, and while the tone/comfort may be better, you might feel like it's nearly imperceptible and maybe even more of a sidegrade than an upgrade.
@@spawn302 more of a Gibson player. Did upgrade a Squier Sonic with about $600 in parts(I actually have a specific reason for a couple of the parts) or so, but that’s largely because I don’t get along with standard size Strats(thickness didn’t fit my body right). I am building a custom off a Player Tele body, and the one major complaint I have is that the Fender neck profile doesn’t sit well with my hand. If I bought a Player II Tele, I would have had to order a custom neck(probably around $350-$600) just to be able to play it. My ideal neck is a thin, asymmetrical neck with a 12” Straight radius in Gibson Scale, with a Tusq XL nut. Out of the guitars I own, my Epi LP Classic Worn has the best playing neck. I already do pickup swaps automatically because I have a preferred sound, always a Super Distortion derivative in the bridge, and the other pickup/s depend on the guitar, but typically ceramics or Alnico IIs.
@@bradleyolinger1691 I dunno man, I have a squier contemporary jazzmaster, made in us fender strat, strandberg, ibanez, ive never had a neck I NEEDED in order to play it. To each his own
Not sure this is a useful comparison unless you only buy from Sweetwater. That pink guitar is not am pro ii specs, am pro ii have 2 points terms, string trees, back plates, no clay dots, vmod pickups, etc. this is just a big Sweetwater commercial
don't forget it has the upgraded synchronized 6 screws tremolo. It's better because it's upgraded xD
Definitely a mod spec guitar for Sweetwater... indeed a 6 point is a downgrade, and staple vs roller tree for string guide is just unacceptable.
i dunno why, but the clay dot inlays on the pink one is really aesthetically pleasing.
That's why they do it!
they do, BUT I have an American Vintage 2 in Fiesta Red that looks AMAZING and pretty much is, but the side clay dots are damn near invisible against the rosewood. I have a hard time seeing them on a dimly lit stage, even in my studio is the light is lower its hard to see. Never realized in over 40 plus years of playing how much I depend on the side dots!! I may put some white our or something on them its actually that bad.
@@brianseneca3546 wait... the side dots are also clay coloured? yikes, i can see that becoming a problem fairly quickly.
you can buy a lume kit for watchmaking depending on your situation. it's classier than dot stickers. it'll be off-white in the day, still brighter than clay dots, and then glow in darker situations. just a thought.
@@brianseneca3546 Get some good glow in the dark marker pen and put just a tiny touch on the side dots. You can always wash it off later.
The American Pro II strat has the Fender Short-Post tuners that make a better break angle and no need for a string tree.
As an owner of an American Pro II Strat, I must point out that the standard spec for this model has V-Mod II pickups and a 9.5 inch radius.
are you happy with the pickups ?
@@marcaustin Absolutely. They really do a great job of recreating vintage tone and adding some new dimensions as well which are perhaps more suitable to modern playing. You can really shape a wide variety of sounds. I can't imagine that I'd ever consider swapping them out on this guitar.
Same, mine is a late 23 model in 2 tone burst with v mod pups and 9.5 radius
and a 2 point bridge rather than the 6 point bridge
Yes indeed and on also has a string tree
Player, player II, pro, pro II, heck even some classic vibes if you play enough of them you'll find a good, even great one in any series. If your a modder it doesn't really even matter much at all. One of my favorite guitars I own is a modded player 1 tele. I have ultras, elites, a sweet mod shop, even a broadcaster but I always go for my players series. The player 1 came with a paufaero fret board which to me feels alot more like ebony, which I personally like better than rosewood. One of the best necks I own came on a squier classic vibe that is absolutely full of flame and has the best rolled edges I've felt on a neck. So my point is try as many as you can, you may like the feel of one better than a more expensive model or the sound out if one you wouldn't have even thought to consider. At the end of the day price doesn't mean a guitar will fit you better and the folks that build guitars in Mexico take the same pride in what they do just like the USA guys do. Just find a good one and the more you play it the better it will feel to you. A guitar doesn't have to break the bank to be a great instrument. Hard work and practice is far more important to make any guitar sound great than a price tag.
The Player One Strat is excellent. Rolling a fretboard is a pretty simple task. I have 7 Fender Custom Shop guitars and my Player One is better than any of them when it comes to soloing. I have no idea what this guy is complaining about.
True, my Player 1 from april this year also came with really smooth fret edges, so I guess they improved the quality of mexican fenders in general (the fretwork is still far from perfect, but definitely playable in recommended factory setup).
Sonically the sound a lot closer than I would have expected. The American Pro II has a little bit more sparkle especially high up the neck during the "Shine on You, Crazy Diamond" but for the money the Player II is actually a pretty good value.
In this video audio....I can't hear the price difference between the Player ii Alnico 5s, and the Am Pro II CS Fat 60s. Yeah back to back here, the AM Pro's CS's have a bit more roundness. But put either of these guitars in a typical "garage/jam" band scenario. And I bet you couldn't hear a difference.
@@Mexxx65 The push push wiring configuration on the Pro 2 sets it apart
@@harrymanilow I have the same pickup selector switch on my MIM Roadhouse Deluxe strat.
@@Mexxx65 that’s cool but that’s not the player 2 retail out the store.
The Player Series is a great guitat
I’ve owned many American strats. I own an American Eric Clapton strat and it’s incredible. But for kicks I bought a fender players surf green with a roasted maple neck it came with fat 50s custom shop pups. It sounds and plays awesome. So I believe I have two great fenders.
I believe the tremolo on the player and player ii are the same.
exactly, I'm pretty sure too
Just hack it out and fit a floyd rose with a locking nut.
They are. So are the pups.
That Pro II sounds incredible, but for $800 bucks that Player II is a steal. I didn’t notice that much of a difference with an untrained ear. I’d swap out the nut to bone as you suggested on that Player II and maybe locking tuners as I’m a lazy string changer and that’s it.
Great vid Rhett.
I will say the Pro II in Olympic White via Sweetwaters site is the one I’d lock down if I was in the market for a new Start, but my wife has crushed that dream😎
You know those vintage style tuners they have on the player 2 are actually a dream to change strings with. Not much advantage getting locking tuners
@@blackfrancis33
True true, I just suck at string changing😎
fair point
For exactly this reason I changed my mind about replacing the standard tuners as well,@@blackfrancis33. When string replacement is done correctly, locking tuners don't offer that much advantage in terms of tuning stability. In fact, I had replaced standard tuners for Kluson locking ones on a semi-hollow and found little to almost zero difference. There are many other aspects of guitar setup that come before when talking about tuning accuracy and stability. When all these are understood and embraced the need for locking tuners disappears where I'm concerned.
I have an ‘02 MIM HSS Strat. If I were to buy a new Strat today I would still go with the Player Series. From the countless videos I’ve seen comparing the levels of guitars, the Players sound just as good as the American or Custom shops. Get it set up, put some quality strings on there and just do your thing.
Underrated comment
A DECENT setup, is the MOST important thing. With any electric guitar of any price range. Who the hell plays an electric guitar out-of-the-box? ...Other than youtube guitar reviewers....
@@Mexxx65 good shout - although that being said the local guitar center where I see a lot of people buy guitars (especially beginners) has a backlog of a month on setups - there are lots of players who don’t set up a new guitar either thinking they shouldn’t have to or not even knowing it’s a thing. Different brands are definitely more playable out of the box and others. For instance, a PRSI wouldn’t worry about a set up in most circumstances. It’s kind of cool to see fender just putting a little bit more care and attention into what they’re shipping out of the factory.
@@dadtimejamtime True, but I think still think its hit or miss with MIM/Fenders. A decent seutp to your specs/settings is paramount for any player of any level.
@@retiredguyadventures6211 what kind of fretboard is your HSS strat?
I appreciate the fact that Fender has finally listened to their customers and added some improvements to their lowest Fender labeled line. But like one commenter below, i think they're looking over their shoulders at the improving value market competitors gaining ground in the quality of their products. Without naming any names, I recently purchased a guitar with a roasted maple neck, locking staggered tuners, bone nut, rosewood fingerboard, ball end stainless steel frets, solid mahogany body EXTREMELY good quality and more for about half the price of a Player or Player ll. The neck alone, if it had Fender on the headstock, would sell for $699. I think the Player and now the Player ll were and are still the best bang for your buck Fenders, but watch out.....the competition is gaining.
That PRS amp is gorgeous and the tone is absolutely stellar. Incredible.
The American having no string tree is most likely due to the American having staggered tuners. (Lowering the angle of the strings without needing a tree)
Oh I didn't see this comment earlier. Yeah, even from the close ups in this video you could see the Am Pro IIs staggered 3 long/ 3 short (non-locking apparently) tuners. Negating the need of any string trees.
Both my American Pro II’s have string trees.
I see now that the American Strat is Sweetwater specs. I don’t have the Fat 60’s pu’s either.
I love that feature! 🎸
The standard issue American Pro II in my possession absolutely DOES have a string tree. I'm guessing that the absence in Rhett's guitar has to do with the fact that it's a Sweetwater spec
It's interesting you think the 6 screw bridge is an upgrade. I've been a loooong time since I've owned one but all my plus and ultra guitars from the 90s have the two point and that has just always felt way more precise to me than the 6 screw ones (yeah I know you can unscrew half the screws and do little tricks to make it feel different).
My biggest issue with Fender is they just have so many options that don't make sense to me. Do people still like the old school rolled saddles? Do you have to upgrade to the next model just to get the more boxy saddles that don't hurt your hand as much? I've always felt like Fender needs 4 lines, an intro American made guitar, a more premium guitar, and ultra style guitar and then a retro guitar. Instead they have around 10 models that make it really confusing. Since none of these modern guitars will ever hold their value, I'm more inclined to just buy parts online from Stratosphere or Stigatsu and make the one you really want. I dunno, Fender is one of my favorite companies but the way they try to market the same guitar drives me crazy.
This is why free market competition is good kids! Definitely a response to how good the Silver Sky SE was.. probably why rosewood was brought back to the mexican line as well!!
I was not even considering buying a new Strat but thanks to your live stream, I saw the Shell Pink Strat with all the additional features and bought one. Amazing guitar! On sale now for about 20% off. Thanks, Rhett and Sweetwater!
A few weeks ago I bought a Fender vintera 2 60s stratocaster in Olympic white mint pickguard after a fresh set of strings and setup it's a great Stratocaster it's better than some other higher American made ones I tried. Best 899 I ever spent my money is in my amps
Always fun to watch, but a fair number of details are either slightly off or inadvertently misleading. Player II kept a lot of specs from Player I, including the same pickups. Biggest changes are the return of rosewood from pau ferro (indian laurel is what you find on recent squiers), lightly rolled fingerboards, some hardware upgrades (tuners), several new colors, and apparently slightly better QC going by early reports. Meanwhile, the "American Professional II" shown here is a limited run GT11 series done by Sweetwater, which costs a couple hundred more and has completely different specs than the original American Professional II, so it's kind of a strange comparison. The GT11 is Sweetwater's attempt to port over their custom shop specs to a more affordable line. They seem like great guitars, but all the specs and hardware choices are subjective. Regular Am Pro II has a 9.5" radius "deep C" neck, compared to GT11 with an 11" radius "60s C"; Pro II has 2-point trem, GT11 has 6 point; Am Pro II has normal dots, normal maple neck, normal Fender string tree, while GT11 has clay dots, roasted maple neck, no string tree (staggered post tuners); Pro II has V-Mod II pickups, GT11 has Custom Shop 60s pickups; both have the same push/push pot to activate neck pup; GT11 comes in a handful of vintage colors on alder bodies, whereas Am Pro II has way more color options, with alder on most and roasted pine for natural and sienna transparent finishes. (Personally, I don't need the GT11 upgrades and love my pine-bodied Am Pro II.) All in all, the Player II series seems like a solid upgrade and a good value compared to the reasonably nice but overpriced Vintera II line. Am Pro II in original form or GT11 is a definite step up and still a good value, with an incredible neck, much nicer pickups, and all-around great specs and features for a modern strat.
I think you should have made the video. Lol. Nice job identifying the gt11
The pickups are the same as player I according to Fender. They just tweaked the Humbucker on the HSS model
I love my Player II. Love your vids, but I think you need to check your info on the Player II. There is no change to the pups on the SSS Player II, per Fender. It's also the same trem as the Player 1. I have both, and the 70th Anni Player sitting right here. The changes for this model as I understand it are only these: Rolled FB edges, Rosewood option & split shaft classic gear tuners. The necks & fretwork on all 3 of my Players is really nice. All are 2024 models, which may make a difference. The QC on my Player 1 could have been a bit better though. My Player II & 70th are flawless.
Rhett is correct about Fender Stratocasters not receiving proper quality control. I had to to exchange my 2021 Pro II five times to get a nice one. If you look inside a lot of Pro II bodies, you can see how careless they can be over at Fender.
I have a Player II and I absolutely love it! The nut wasn’t cut well, but other than that, pretty wonderful. Great tone and plays beautifully.
Rhett, this was my favorite playing of yours I've heard for feeling, technique, and tone. I really appreciate that you played music, as opposed to the meandering noodling one hears on the vast majority of review videos. The Player II gave the Pro a genuine run for its money, even with the stock pickups on the Player II. The upgrades on the Player II are phenomenal for the money.
My Player II Strat (in Birch green like the one Rhett has) came to me from Sweetwater with the nut slots cut too shallow. I had a luthier fix that for $60.00. Sweetwater reimbursed me for that repair (I consider this a completion, not a repair) which is cool. I just don't think Fender was ever made aware and that irks me. Anyway, now this Strat plays awesome and I really love it. Cheers!
This is unfortunately way to common with fender
@@Project25_01Same with my Player 1 Strat and Tele both
This is normal and is part of a setup that you should get done locally when you buy the guitar.
Many manufacturers cut their slots a bit shallow in order for the buyer to complete their preferred setup with a luthier. For whatever reason this is never explained. Still, the guitar should be close when it leaves the factory.
You helped me make up my mind . I was real curious about these new player2's. They already sound and feel better than my player 1 just by the various videos and reviews. Thank you very much!
I spent a couple years off and on wanting to find a Tele that felt good, but everything I tried short of custom shop did not make me smile and often made me bleed the fret work was so bad. Ended up with a Reverend Greg Koch signature T-Style with roasted maple neck, locking tuners, brass saddle that makes me smile every time my hands caress that neck.
My take on these Fender models I go with the Made in USA and higher end Professional II model due to they are offered at the moment for $1600 at GC and at Sweetwater vs $800 for a Player II model ... They are both offered with 48 month payment plan with no interest. So that means for $34/month you can have a Pro II Strat and then you do not need to fiddle with swapping the pickups, changing the nut and adding a push/push circuit, plus you'll end up with a USA Fender vs MIM one...
Plus if you want to compare apples to apples, remember you'll need to add a $230 expense to get a hard case for the Player II... That makes your $800 guitar $1030...while your Pro II comes with that case. So the real difference is $570... And for that reason I choose Pro II all day long!
I know, at first, it feels too much to pay $1600 for a Strat but again in my case it was only $34/month payment while I am enjoying a really cool instrument. I am not a pro or on stage ever. I am a 66 yr old guitarist who plays to bug his wife and two little dogs when the mood strikes. I don't even have friends to jam, so thanks to Online Free Guitar Backing Tracks + my iPad & JBL wireless speaker, I make my own "poor man's band" and enjoy myself for hours and hours at times. IMHO that's the most fun you can have for $34/month!
I tried a couple of Player II Strats and although they do have better necks, they seem to have weaker tone to me. However, I also tried the Player II Teles and those sound incredible. Also, in a rare case where I agree with the upcharge, I tried both the Player II Strat and Tele with chambered ash or mahogany bodies, and the altered woods really brought more of both guitars to life!
Player II has exactly the same pickups as Player I. That is a fact confirmed by the Fender dealer. And you will not find anywhere Fender say anything about "upgrading" the pickups on these models. Rosewood, fingerboard and new colors are super nice though. They are basically the same guitar a Fender American standard used to be some 15 years ago.
The player 1 series had alnico 2 pickups and now they have alnico 5 pickups btw bro keeps editing peoples comments thinks he knows everything
@@noahhaworth3697 sonically they are 98% the same thing
Geeze calm down no one made you the gatekeeper@@retiredguyadventures6211
@@noahhaworth3697Editing other people's comments?
Am Pro IIs all have the push push S1 switch that adds the neck pickup. They also normally come with a 9.5" radius, not 11" unless that was a Sweetwater specification.
The 11 inch radius is a Sweetwater exclusive thing. They do it on their custom spec’d GT11 which is an incredible looking guitar in the chrome blue finish.
the 6 point bridge and fat 60s CS pickups are also unique Sweetwater specs and a stock Pro 2 has the VMod 2 pickups and a 2 point bridge.
Sounds amazing, much better than the previous gen (I do like the AlniCo5s though). The Gibson QC problem vs the Fender? True, Fender might have a few slips here and there but their modular design is a great advantage. Look at this very example, you did not like the pickups in that Player II? well- there is a large market of special parts to choose from and you know you can easily find something to your taste. So does everyone else when choosing a Fender or Squier even. These things are made to be modded and adjusted to each player's preferences. Not so with the Gibsons- sure, you can change parts on those as well- but it's not a huge aftermarket out there, and people tend to judge- oh a Gibson with switched pups.. desecrated etc. Nobody bats an eyelash over a swapped pickup set in a Fender/Squier. There are always good, very good and excellent options- and if the potential SH buyer does not like what the seller did to the guitar, they can easily change it back - even to stock specs if so desired- without too much effort or money.
He's so certain about the pickups... needing to swap pups in the player.
But there's really not much between them.
The yosemite pickups were absolutely used on custom shop strats before they landed in the player II series
They both sound great.
I think yosemites are in the american performer, not the player 2
Mr. Shull, I think the player 2 really put the pro to shame in this video and settings, I loved the Kenny Wayne Shepherd sound you had going very unique very awesome. Don’t know if anybody else recognized it but I sure did. Close to 45 years of searching for the right sound, and I loved the sound of the player 2 , I almost think I was supposed to, we hear our own playing and sound that we want better so badly we mess it up, the truth is we get bore, tiered of listening to ourselves if this video is accurate, I wouldn’t give $10 extra for the pro. thank you for a nice video and nice chords. Enjoyed the sound.
I don’t get the fuss about rolled edges. Just makes it easier for the string to fall off the edge during aggressive playing. I’ll take normal edges thanks.
Wow! The Pro II sounds unbelievable! I really don’t think they are that close in tone, but that’s just me.
Glad to hear the Players are given more attention to detail and consumers desires as far as most of the specs.
I was surprised by how noticeable the difference was between these two great guitars for their price point.
@@retiredguyadventures6211 Someone shares their experience and observation and you call em' a "know it all" ?
Cmon lighten up it's not healthy.
Thanks for the review Rhett. I was about to pull the trigger on a Pro II GT11. But my wife is battling cancer, so it’s just not a good time to spend $2K as much as I would like to. Adulting sucks! This review was very helpful and it nudged me over the edge. I’m most likely gonna get a graph tech nut, and a loaded DG pickguard from 920D, It’s gonna come in at a grand and some change, so thats a bit more doable. After this, I feel much better about the purchase. Thanks for hitting all the high points. As soon as I’m done here I’m placing my order. So SW owes you one. Thanks again man.
For the clean comparison, I liked the Player II way more. I think the Pro II sounds a little too muffled.
Same.
I have to say the Player II pickups sounded great through headphones. I'm sure there was more of a difference in the room, but both guitars came across really well with RUclips audio quality.
I was glad the see the changes. Swapping for better pickups is simple and relatively inexpensive, but changing the nut, oof. Unless you've done it a few times and are good at it, it's a bit of work, and then the filing and always looking at it thinking you could've done better is annoying. I don't know how much it costs to have a pro do it, but I imagine it will be more than a few dollars. I'd probably stick with plastic nut.
Both of them sound surprisingly really great. I think the player sounds a bit thinner and has more twang, but the pro also sounds really nice with it's fatter sound.
For sure, thats mainly down to pickups and probably the bridge choice.
Yeah! Thinner, more twang and, I’ll say, more clarity. That’s the type of strat sound I like. The American Pro sounds muffled to my ears.
Fantastic choice playing Shine On… That’s what a Stratocaster should sound like! Great demo comparison! All the sounds!
I feel the Player II sounded awesome. It is always a personal thing and reviewers should take that into account.
one key point I think needs to be addressed is that the AMPro II is a special run for Sweetwater only with 11" radius fretboard, as one point of difference. SO, this is not a "regular" off the shelf Pro II
I played both today at a shop. I preferred the player ll personally
Nice shoot out! I think Fender had better listened as they're seeing lots of competition from really high quality copies of the Fender-Strat build by Japanese, Indonesian, South Korean and Chinese manufacturers. E.g. I got myself a Squier Deluxe from Indonesia, did some mild mods and today it can really stand its ground against similar models three times the original budget, except Sire's Strat series. To me, their quality in build and sound kick all competitors in that price range right out of the ball park, that's how great their products are IMHO.
chose a Larry Carlton Sire over the player Strat. Glad I did. Cheaper and has all the bells and whistles, rolled fret board edges, American alder, bone nut etc.
one complaint i had is the Allan key that they supply doesn't fit the saddles you need a 1.27mm key not the 1.5mm supplied
Hey Rhett! The Player 1 and Player 2 has the same pickups on the strats. The official fender website says Player Series Alnico 5 Strat® Single-Coil pickups for both player 1 and 2. And when they made a comparison they even said that they are the same. The two saddle bridge is the same too. I agree tho it looks and feels much nicer and the tuners are better as well... But yeah I think it's worth correcting and pointing out because player 1 is much cheaper now used and it makes a difference for most people... And they should know that some features stayed the same;) peace!❤
Player 1s also had Pau Ferro fretboards, not Indian Laurel. Not sure where he was pulling those Player 1 specs from, but they were way off
Respect for the honest opinion. So many great guitars around for around £1000 now, it makes playing so much more enjoyable now without pimping out your Granma 😄
Bought a player II tele and it’s incredible
The Player 2 and the Pro 2 both sounded great, yes the Pro 2 pickups were lovely. Nice rounded sound. I actually loved the look of the Player 2
I’d love either. But I’d certainly go for the cheaper one obviously. But to get all the upgrades the Pro 2 has without need to either do this myself or visit a luthier to do the work has a certain convenience.
I don’t necessarily think there is a better or worse, a right or wrong. There is simply one is obviously going to be different.
Btw I loved both colours, but my favourite as far as looks are concerned is the Player 2.
As someone with larger hands, how do you find the nut width difference?
42.8mm on American pro ii
42mm on player ii
100% agree about the crummy fret work on player I strats and teles. I seriously played dozens of them in guitar stores and hated every one of them. At least they were consistent. But, I also don’t love how low the player I frets are. Not really my jam. And this is from someone that gets on ok with genuine vintage fender frets. Note, I didn’t say I loved vintage frets, just that if I’m buying a new guitar, my preference is for something like the so called ‘narrow tall’ frets fender uses on a lot of other guitars. Final thought, I don’t think fender listens to their customers one bit, I think they noticed people buying less expensive T and S style guitars and then not looking back. I’m close to pulling the trigger on a non fender S body myself.
I tried one, and they're definitely much better than the old Player series. Before, I did get a Squier Classic Vibe and upgrade it, for my second Strat. And I have a Vintera as my first Strat. But, don't forget tthe Vintera II. It's closer in price to the Player II, and I like them better in almost every way. In particular, the pickups are better, and I also prefer the more classic outfit & colours. I also prefer the Vintera II to the performer, for the same reason. Iif you can stretch the budget, by the time you upgrade the Player II, for the money, may as well have bought the better Vintera II. Player II vs Vintera II is the more relevant comparison, for most people. It's a big leap up to the Performer, and maybe for not that much gain _unless_ you are set on a Made in USA guitar. But honestly, is there really any meaningful difference? The older Player basses are nice, have an old Player Jazz Bass as my second bass. It has a maple neck and it's actually damn good. I replaced the bridge for a high-mass, upgraded the pickups to Lollars, and did some light work myself on the neck and frets. Was pretty easy and didn't cost that much to bring it up to the level of my main Vintera II P Bass. But with better Lollar pickups and bridge, and costing about 200 less. And in the buttercream finish, it's a stunning Jazz Bass with a good weight.
This is your best video yet, Rhett. I too dislike the AlNiCo 5 magnets - too harsh-sounding, whilst the AlNiCo 3s are too slow and sluggish-sounding. To my ears, the AlNiCo 2s are the just-right-sounding, ‘Goldilocks’ of magnets.
👱🏼♀🧲👌🏻
I find it interesting how mid-range instruments compared to high-end ones in terms of sonority, high-end ones tend to have a clearer mid-range, regardless of whether they are brighter or duller, in several videos including this one I see the same difference, the Player II has some strange harmonics in the 500-800 Hz area while the Americana is cleaner, it is not an abysmal difference, but in the mix it makes things much easier.
Uhm that's the pickups. I bet he didn't even set equal height. People put they're pickups wherever and claim a difference in sound that vanishes once you use a set of calipers to adjust height. You cannot even measure it in a scientific analysis beyond the margin of error.
If they put a maple neck on that Player II series I'd probably buy one immediately. Sonically... I thought it was very close and can easily be improved with new pickups. That birch green color is unreal! Love it.
The regular non-GT11 Pro Am II Strat also has the push-push Tone knob to add neck pup. (I'm buying a GT11 as soon as Sonic Blue is back in stock. I was sold before this vid though. :) )
For a Nashville vibe cat like you , that Shine on your crazy diamonds hommage is pure class , and the primal reason why Strat sound gets directly into my soul. I'm taljing about the player one off couse . Thank you for this content
My only question is, since you're getting the guitar from Sweetwater, aren't they giving you the best possible version of the guitar and not just the random one off the wall?
@RhettSchull, aside from the colors in this year’s Player II options, the one reason I didn’t buy a Player II is the neck itself. For whatever reason, Fender necks, and the 9.5” radius, do not suit my hands. I have that on my Sonic Strat(heavily modded otherwise). I was able to pick up a Player I Tele body only(Tidepool), and am going to get a custom neck to better fit my hand. My Epi Les Paul Classic has a great asymmetrical, thinner neck with a 12” straight radius I love, so going with a custom neck. Going to also do a P90 in the neck and Super Distortion T in the bridge with a coil tap option and individual tone/volume controls(due to the hotter pickups I want a bit more control than the standard Tele setup) using concentric pots. I think the Player/Player II series are ideal for the player that prefers to make the guitar their own.
I agree with you regarding the fret work, or lack thereof, on the first Player series. I bought one used and had to file the fret edges before I could comfortably play the guitar. For the price of the original player series, it was very disappointing that Fender sold these guitars with such rough fret edges.
I have the player 2, White with black pickguard, i absolutely LOVE it!
awesome content as always! and THANKS SWEETWATER!!
Good review, very helpful and informative!
Using Sweetwater helps also because they do a great job inspecting and QC
Biggest thing left for me would be stainless steel frets.. I build strats just to mainly get stainless, but it's nice to be able to upgrade parts upfront too
No, i had hoped so but, The pickups are identical to the player One.
I really dug into this. Fender themselves said they felt the player series alinico v were great and didn't need any change while they tried others , "we decided the player series was best with what we had on the player one"....Maybe not word for word but it's in a video fender themselves posted.
@@robertclarkguitar Fender could have easily.....dropped in some Noiselss pickups from the old Player Plus. Then that WOULD have been a worthwhile upgrade over the Player 1!!
@@Mexxx65 no way, noiseless pickups sound like shite
The pink one has a bit of a warmer sound. The green one a bit more sharp tone. Hard to tell to much from the demo. I would go with the green one in a maple neck if offered that way.
I've got a player 1 plus top pau ferro and like it. Tried out a player 2 and yes the rosewood looks nice and the rolled edges are great but that's about it!
The pickups are the same as on player 1 and are not an upgrade apart from the cream coloured pickup covers and knobs. As for the 2 point trem bridge and saddles are also the same as on the player 1 and are not an ugrade.
However what I have noticed that the neck thickness feels consistently slimmer than that on the player 1 with pau ferro that I played in various shops and compared between the two! The other thing I noticed that the pau ferro has a little bit more snap compared to the rosewood fretboard that sounds darker, the feel between the 2 fretboards is pretty much the same if you can get past the name of the pau ferro. More expensive guitar makers use pau ferro on their guitars because of it's tone, even the SRV customshop strat has a pf fretboard.
I have a Player I Stratocaster (a secon hand one), the Buttercream color (maple fretboard), originally born with HSS that I totaly swapped (the whole pickguard and pots and so on...) with one classic SSS with Lace Sensor pickups. I've got several Vintera Series Stratocaster, and despite the fact I prefer the 7.25 radius over the 9.5, I usually use this Player I for recording. I really love the neck of that guitar. On frets, You are right: they were horrible, I had to bring to my local luthier to get rectified and set to dignity. It's the only complain I had on that Player I Series. For the price I paid (500 euros in Italy) it's an awesome guitar. I didn't check out the Player II yet but I'm eager to try the one with tonal chambers in Transparent Cherry Burst. Might be my next one...🤪
Wow…..great vid Rhett! I always adjust, modify, tweak, add to, take away from, alter, trash, start over, constantly learn, fail, learn again, experiment, succeed, fail again, learn again on all of my guitars ( except on my Martin HD 35…just a few minor tweaks, added a pickup system, and that baby is being allowed to blossom on it’s own, and it is! ) That being said, I immediately noticed a huge difference in the sound of both guitars. The green one, although it sounded good, it almost seemed as if each string was competing for top billing. There was a total lack of unity in the sound. The pink one? There was still a lot of focus on the main notes being played, but there was an overall unity in the sound. It just felt warmer, smoother, and left me wanting to hear more. I totally agree with your assessment…….put some better pickups on that green guitar, and it will be something to be cherished. But now…..that push-pull pot to bring in the neck pickup……hmmmmm. Guess what I will be experimenting with tomorrow?!
Those subtle tweaks on the Sweetwater spec Strat are awesome little upgrades over the stock amproii. That's a really awesome guitar.
Maybe the reason the fit and finish is as good as it is could have something to do with Sweetwater setting the guitars up before they sent them. They have a 50+ point fit and fettle check and adjust that they do.
The Pro II has a 9.5" radius IIRC and isn't $1200 more than the player. Maybe it was that if you bought from Sweetwater but the Pro II has been going for $1599 for some time on the Fender website.
Loved this video. The PRO definitely sounds better, the pickups are richer, more balanced and more pleasant. It feels as if perhaps you can tweak your tone slightly better for the Player but I can't imagine you'll reach the same depth of tone you get with the PRO. The PRO is much more expensive tho. This was a good video.
I went and checked them out when they hit the stores, and I wrote a little review for FB - I personally concluded they were a big improvement on the player I, and I have 2 player 1's. I 100% agree with 1's poor fretwork, and the neck makes the player 2. I said this makes Fender a serious player the 750 to 1000 mkt again (especially with Sire's QC really falling off based on feedback). I also said I wouldn't buy another Player, if I were buying I'd move up to MIJ. Then five days later I bought a player 2 tele. And I haven't put it down. If I were buying another strat, I would still go up series, but i do not like ashtray bridges, and the 2 really checked all the boxes. And I bought the one I'd had time to play on, so I knew what I was getting.
only thing ive done to any of my MIM strats for up grades is bigger block and better pups other then that they're just fine with a basic fret tuneup
That am pro ii gt11 is flawless. Only thing i changed was fhe pickup covers. I've never liked the look of pure white bobbins on mint pickguards
The only thing you got wrong was the bridge is the same 2 point with the same saddles on the player 1 & 2. Phillip McKnight shows that it’s the same bridge in his American fender
Can you imagine being like "Hey Sweetwater, send me those Fenders". Dang man, you worked hard and you are living the dream for real. You have a huge studio, you have all the gear you want. What life God has blessed you with. You're a cool guy, I wouldn't mind jamming with you and having a couple glassed of Old Grandad.
You should try a couple of the Harley Benton guitars. I have several but the 335 knock off is unbelievable for the price.
Rhett really likes vintage guitars and rolled fingerboards. Basically a broken in feel is a top factor for him. What I find most interesting with his guitar shootouts is he tends to omit the entry level American “standard” version of instruments.
Underrated comment.
yeah, for me Rhett lost all his credibility long time ago, the guy just doesn't have good ear or taste for a good tone... he is the only youtuber I saw trash talking the Player I series
@@blackstormer95strictly sound wise player I was a good guitar, it felt like shit on the hands though and pau ferro was horrid dry and scratchy
Isn’t the American Pro line equivalent to the old American Standard line? That’s what he’s shown here.
@blackstormer95 yeah, a lot of his videos feel like he's being a contrarian just for the sake of it.
Awesome video which was very informative. I have the American Pro I series and the American Performer series and love them both. This video you made just helped me make my decision on buying a new Player Series. I just purchased it in yellow and should be here in a few days. Thank you for your video and you sound amazing, your a very talented guitarist and play amazing.
I would love to see a video expanding on why you like the fat strat pickups and not the alnico 5... or even on what makes a good pickup in general
I have 2010 MIM lone star strat, two fender Texas special single coils and a Seymour Duncan pearly gates humbucker , came stock in it. I love it! With that said I’ll def be adding the push / pull tone knob for the neck pickup mod. So thanks for sharing!!
Sorry for the long reply!
I respect Rhett's honesty, but it feels disingenuous to say all Player series are "lesser" than other models. The real problem with the line has always been finding a great one is hard. It means playing the lottery - if you don't have high volume music store locally and the time/patience, chnaces are you settle for the one that's there.
He mentioned that they have been getting better over time, and I would agree. My first Player was a year one P Bass that is frankly horrible (sold), and then a Player Mustang that wasn't much better (returned) - both had a culmination of tiny annoyances and issues that started to appear when you looked closer. Bummer!
Early last year my opinion did a 180. I grabbed a variant of a Player Strat with factory upgrades, a roasted maple neck (amazing factory rounded edges and impeccable fretwork), Fat 50s pickups, and a beautiful sea foam green finish. It was during a Fender promotion, so it cost $100 CAD more than the base model. After doing some upgrades, a term/bridge, a bone nut, locking tuners, the result is an early 60s inspired, modern feeling , "players, working guitar".
It rivals both of my American Strats; a 2004 HSS American Standard bought new and a 2015 American Vintage 65 bought used in 2017 that has since sold. I never loved either of those, and chose this Player over dozens of America models played over a few months span.
The Player series are guitars that have a higher variance in fit, finish, and tone than someone who is willing to spend a few grand should stomach. My guess is prpduction volume, which is why the limited run version all seem to be better guitars. Some really do end up being better than others, sadly significantly less than what has been coming off the American assembly line.
Glad to hear the Player II are bucking that trend, so more people get guitar they love and can afford.
I definitely prefer the pick ups in the player two Strat. They are clearer and more articulate. The pick ups in the standard pro are smoother, but they lack a little bit of that articulation and chime
The best Strats by Fender are the Elite and of course the top of the line is the Ultra Luxe.
Thanks Rhett! This was a really good comparison video and a good representation of the Player II Stratocaster in general... Keep up the good work!
On the Strat Player II, the specs say it has a synthetic bone nut (i.e. plastic). On an $800 guitar, they can't afford to use a bone nut? How much is a bone nut, $8-$10 retail?
Regarding the overall tones, the Player II sounds exactly what I expect regarding the "Strat sound", it's so good.
Otherwise, the American Pro seems a bit more "balanced" to me and with a sort of "modern" sound, in my opinion.
What's your opinion on the Fender Strat Plus from 1987-1997?
I've owned both these models pro 2 & player 2 MIM ; your description is spot on. The performer series is cool too. I like hhs ones the best. For the low noise & high gain. U do loose some of trademark spank.
Im going to pick up a used G&l legacy strat this paycheck.I keep hearing the quality control is really good.
I’ve got a GT11 and it plays and sounds different than the Pro Am II. It’s also more expensive unfortunately, but I love mine. It’s too bad you didn’t do a straight comparison per your video title.
Love My Fender Player Series 1 FSR - Roasted Maple Neck - 2 Point trem - Custom Shop Fat 50's all stock - Paid 5 Bills New! Search em out!! Fiesta Red.