Timestamps: 02:30 - Vasquez childhood 10:35 - Education & law career 17:15 - Depp vs Heard case: media attention & fame she got from the case 18:12 - OJ Simpson case & her internship with his lawyer Robert Shapiro 20:40 - Depp vs Heard case: fans & fame 21:50 - Vasquez claims she isn’t perfect; she works with ‘clients she should not have’ and work on things ‘she doesn’t necessarily believe in’ but it’s part of being a lawyer 22:38 - How Vasquez became famous: ‘theatre, glitz, glamor in court’, a lot of preparation beforehand, a lot of effort, criticism and learning. 26:50 - Does media attention help or hinder? Social media reactions. 28:50 - Believes cameras in courtrooms help, show how trials take place, thinks it’s being used for education 30:40 - experiences during education, studying 32:00 - Observing other lawyers and preparation was important for Vasquez. “In cross examination what you want is the jury to be looking at you” “It doesn’t matter what the witness says in response”, it’s about the points she makes in the question. Described how the jury members physically turned their backs on Amber and did not listen to her words. They wanted all attention on Depp and wanted the jury to be captivated by him. Confirms clothing and interactions were completely staged to manipulate the jury. Send subliminal messages to impress the jury. “It is theatre.” 36:20 - outro
I hope this helps! I can’t believe she just confirmed all our suspicions about the case. She truly learned from the OJ Simpson case. She knows how bad Depp did in the UK case even confirming headbutting Amber in an incident where he was restraining her. She knew the evidence of emotional abuse, destruction of property. Vasquez knew it all but she wanted to defend him to get a good career and shine like a lawyer. Now all wifebeaters can hire her to get away with horrible abuse and silence victims. Litigation abuse playbook. I hope she is proud of herself.
Skip to 32:00 for the most interesting part about how two jury members didn’t want to acknowledge Amber. What was the judge doing? Why were these people allowed in a jury if they had no intention of listening to testimony? It’s a sham. Depp’s fans were not only in the audience but also in that jury.
@@taylorlaverdiere2463 most? how many is most? anyways they still jumped on the MRA pirate party train didnt they. not looking at her while she gave evidence, nodding off (as confirmed by the court stenographer) what a joke that trial was
Timestamps:
02:30 - Vasquez childhood
10:35 - Education & law career
17:15 - Depp vs Heard case: media attention & fame she got from the case
18:12 - OJ Simpson case & her internship with his lawyer Robert Shapiro
20:40 - Depp vs Heard case: fans & fame
21:50 - Vasquez claims she isn’t perfect; she works with ‘clients she should not have’ and work on things ‘she doesn’t necessarily believe in’ but it’s part of being a lawyer
22:38 - How Vasquez became famous: ‘theatre, glitz, glamor in court’, a lot of preparation beforehand, a lot of effort, criticism and learning.
26:50 - Does media attention help or hinder? Social media reactions.
28:50 - Believes cameras in courtrooms help, show how trials take place, thinks it’s being used for education
30:40 - experiences during education, studying
32:00 - Observing other lawyers and preparation was important for Vasquez. “In cross examination what you want is the jury to be looking at you” “It doesn’t matter what the witness says in response”, it’s about the points she makes in the question. Described how the jury members physically turned their backs on Amber and did not listen to her words. They wanted all attention on Depp and wanted the jury to be captivated by him. Confirms clothing and interactions were completely staged to manipulate the jury. Send subliminal messages to impress the jury. “It is theatre.”
36:20 - outro
I hope this helps! I can’t believe she just confirmed all our suspicions about the case. She truly learned from the OJ Simpson case. She knows how bad Depp did in the UK case even confirming headbutting Amber in an incident where he was restraining her. She knew the evidence of emotional abuse, destruction of property. Vasquez knew it all but she wanted to defend him to get a good career and shine like a lawyer. Now all wifebeaters can hire her to get away with horrible abuse and silence victims. Litigation abuse playbook. I hope she is proud of herself.
Skip to 32:00 for the most interesting part about how two jury members didn’t want to acknowledge Amber. What was the judge doing? Why were these people allowed in a jury if they had no intention of listening to testimony? It’s a sham. Depp’s fans were not only in the audience but also in that jury.
No they interviewed the jury most had not seen his movies
@@taylorlaverdiere2463 most? how many is most? anyways they still jumped on the MRA pirate party train didnt they. not looking at her while she gave evidence, nodding off (as confirmed by the court stenographer) what a joke that trial was
@@taylorlaverdiere2463 One of them was not vetted. They broke standard court basics. The jury also is a big fan of JD.
Kelsey have u spoke with these juries?
Theatre? Good of her to admit it, but shouldn't a trial be about justice?
she never thought he was innocent - not for ONE second