"Do we ban people who run gay ops in other communities and not yours" Yes Dev. Yes. Because I don't want that shit in my community. If they are willing to shit in other peoples pools, they aren't allowed in mine. Because I'm not gonna risk them shitting up my pool.
I to look up what a gay op was, but regardless of whether you support LGB. T or you don't why in the c*** Would you want to legitimize harming people? And so by Dev acting like this and just being nonchalant about it, he's basically complicit in violence against a group of people, no matter whether you agree with the lifestyle or not, that's just messed up..
Such was pretty much my first thought, too. So freakin' glorious that the one who so despises being called 'bad faith' would imply they know way too many ways to do so.
"Sir, your son bully's other children at school. We have evidence of of him teasing students, starting fights, and stealing lunch money." "WELL HE BEHAVES HIMSELF AT HOME AND HE'S RESPECTFUL TO ME, SO ITS NOT MY PROBLEM!"
No, it's not. My child is my responsibility. A better analogy would be your employee or client. It's not your business until people make it your business. Aka cancel culture.
I like how you pre-empted him a week ago saying you knew he'd claim you took him out of context, put a 5-minute uncut clip at the end showing the full context, and then Dev says you took him out of context. Absolute baller.
"Where is the proof?" >shows the proof "You are a schizo" I really dont know what else anyone could do in that situation besides letting that person scream into a wall.
And she's still respects Josh Moon even though she knows one day she's going to have a thread on the Kiwi Farms on her stupid shit said she's not dumb about it and differences they're going to make it funny and kinda true unlike Dev mods.
@@subjectnivleis7572he's already has a thread and he tried to the derail it got thread ban for it by Josh Moon himself even call him a bundle of sticks to his face.
It's actually really ironic considering there's a meme about a very religious person turning down a firefighter, police officer, and a good Samaritan because their God will save them. When they get to heaven and ask why god didn't save them he responds he sent all three. Dev and a lot of leftist refuse to admit they've made the state into God so the state can do no wrong in their eyes because clearly the all powerful being they worship can do no wrong.
Dev: "Well you see, he was at a Trump rally, therefore bad and deserving of sland-I mean EVEN HANDED coverage to balance out the praise he's receiving."
That would require that Dev admit two things: that (a) he was wrong about something, and (b) admit that he was lying when he said he was fine with edgy jokes.
The context is, there was a tweet asking whom one would save from a burning building. The options were, I think, Biden, some other Dem, and Putin. CC replied Putin. Mind you, this was, if memory serves, back in 2021. Yes, really.
i do like how Lum Lum has actually damned Dev in that clip. If he wants to try to provide proof Ace, Aydin, etc are lying about him, he now needs to provide the entire discord conversation and not just snippets where he lies by omission or structure.
@@zacharyrollick6169 meh, she is using Arch as much as he is using her. Plus her own podcast is nice but is very vtuber focused so is not for everyone
@@zacharyrollick6169I would more so judge them for the company they keep if they don't push on said person's BS and not try to help the person get better.
10:39 Yes Dev, we do start banning puppy killers, child molesters and those doing gay ops. The most insulting thing to the concept of principles is saying you have principles at all.
In Dev's latest video there was more venom to Christians under surface than at a cobra convention. I think this is his biggest stumbling block he can't get over; he thinks evangelicals are ALL out to take away his video games when really it was a VERY small group behind the moral panic that roped others in.
YES! Precisely! My mom is as much a Bible thumper as the most devout of them yet was NOT on board with the anti-Harry Potter book bans. She gave them a chance first before concluding one way or the other. She's of the same mind as the judge that stated: "You'll know it when you see it." Her only censorship was preventing us, her children, from consuming damaging materials.
It wasn't even just the evangelicals, unless Dev wants to pretend that people like Hillary Clinton and Tipper Gore were devout and upstanding Christian women in the 80s and 90s.
If anything their zeal contributed to why the games were so good, they wanted to make satanic shit the best to prove le Christians wrong, and damn were the games good.
I still find it almost unbelievable that not only would dev equate pdf activities to shoplifting or a DUI but that he can't seem to grasp that a pdf in a discord server is a present and real danger to the others on the server.
At 11:15 Dev compares someone approaching kids to someone being a petty thief because they're both against the law. Then he uses that leap to imply the thief was poor and that'd end up as "ban all poor people". With this and his constant references to the courts and their decisions it's like he has no values of his own and only bases his morals off of the law. He also seems to think because he isn't in law enforcement that he doesn't need to uphold morality personally. What a morbid mindset
You're just one step off, unfortunately. It's not 'the law' that Dev worships so clearly but 'the state' in stead, the ones who make, interpret, and enforce the laws however they deem fit. It's why, as Ace points out, even when the state is breaking the laws they have themselves made Dev will still defend the state because the state claims it's in the right to do so.
Lum Lum already knows how full of shit Dev is, even Occo brings up from time to time that Dev kept teasing that he had Metokur’s dox and Mizu destroyed Dev. Occo has that Metokur video in the holster btw so anytime Dev denies that happened then he knows he’ll get exposed.
The same guy that took Kirsche out of context, and then lied about doing that, is now claiming that ackshually everyone else is taking him out of context? Sounds kinda bad faith, Dev.
Dev: You have to show the full convo to get the full context. Ace shows the full convos and the full video clips. Dev: now Your just bad faith... So by playing by Dev's rules if You speak out against him Your bad Faith no matter how pruth You have that Dev is a 2 faced snake
@@wtf1a1aAce doesn't claim Dev is complicit with PDFs, Ace provides irrefutable proof of Dev, in his own words, saying he's perfectly fine to allow PDFs in his Discord server, even knowing full well they're PDFs. The full clip, played with full context, of Dev saying exactly that, is at 7:57. Bad faith is Dev slandering Uzala and Aydin as PDFs with no proof, desktop the objective, immutable fact that Dev is perfectly fine with keeping company with PDFs.
@@DaMaster012 pretty sure dev also said he trys and keeps his discord as free speech as possible. so in a weird way check outs even if opticaly its bad
The problem with Dev's position on the whole "not banning pedos" thing is that there is an actually principled way to come to the non-action that he has decided, but Dev is such a bad faith actor that he isn't being principled. He's being apathetic. The context shows his first reaction was literally "I don't care." From what I've seen the only explanations that seem possible is that Dev is either an actual psychopath, as in actually lacks the ability to understand other people's perspective, or he is just a bad faith actor who will lie whenever it is convenient for him.
-Folks demand Dev to remove pedos from his community -Dev then 'what abouts' by comparing grooming minors to shoplifting The absolute state of canadians.
The biggest problem is his blatant hypocrisy, as he has and likely continues to ban people for off server actions, or even just being in a server he hates. He doesn't ban the PDFs when they're sucking off his ego and giving him things.
Every time I watch that clip, I'm struck with the thought of "Why is it so difficult for you to be staunchly against child endangerment? Are YOU one of them Dev? Should we be starting criminal investigations into you? Why can't you be, simply and unabashedly, AGAINST pdfiles? Why is nuance even NECESSARY?"
Exactly, I mean it would be a bit different if Dev said if didn't know they were doing that off his server. Or if he couldn't confirm if the accusation were true about them doing that. Then that would be a more nuanced approach. But Dev didn't, he openly said that even having full knowledge they were doing that(and the full criminal act),he would still continue allowing them on his server. And that doesn't bode well on Dev already poor character and make him very suspect.
Because in his mind, since he already allowed his mod to harrass Kirsche, and his justification is that he didn't broke his server rules, he should uphold that justification for everything. Otherwise he is a hypocrite for not stoping the harrasment, and then he has to find other ways to sound smart and not admit guilt. But he is so full of himself, he doesn't care this position makes him allow child predators to have access to his comunity, because like he said "it's not my responsibility". He doesn't care, he is morally bankrupt.
A day in the life of Dev: -Wakes up - Falls out of bed, crashing through the floor due to him being fat - Eats - Goes to the computer - Looks at the folder titled 'Trucker Video' - Decides now is not the time, it is time to eat - Goes to twitter - Spends the next four hours telling you "I didn't insult Corey Comperatore and his family" whilst then proceeding to insult Corey Comperatore and his family - Eats - Spends the next three hours on twitter saying "but the other side is equally as bad!" - Eats - Goes back to the computer - Looks at the folder titled 'Ace Response Video' - Decides now is not the time, it is time to stream and eat - Streams for a few hours, making sure to block anyone who points out problems with his discord - Goes back to bed Rinse, repeat
This is insane. Literally every time Ace covers Dev he always brings extensive receipts to highlight Dev’s hypocrisy and what not. On a side note I am wondering how exactly Dev plans on making his response video, especially when it comes to Ace, Aydin Paladin and Uzalu. Here’s my prediction: Dev will try and paint Ace as a scorned ex fan and will lie by omission with Aydin and Uzalu because there is no way he can be honest about the story with Aydin and Uzalu and look good.
With Aydin it's possible for him to start off looking good as she technically did "leak dms" but it's such an *erm* *ackshualee* level technicality that it'll make him look petty at best and bad faith at worst. Considering all he'll need to cover in it I put my money on the latter, making him look even worse.
Guess we have to assume that everyone in Dev's discord server is a pdf-file, since he condones their behavior if it "doesn't happen on his server". Dev doesn't understand that being a NIMBYist is a bad thing, and proudly proclaiming it was one of the funniest self-owns in his repertoire. And that's saying something.
People seem to forget that NIMBY was never about allowing things to happen elsewhere. NIMBY has always been "that isn't allowed, ESPECIALLY not around me."
Dev talking about taking someone taking him out of context after deceptively clipping Kirsche out of context regarding edgy jokes after a tragedy is laughable. Just one example of many that sprung to mind. It's wild how much of an unrepentant snake he is.
Wanna know how awful Dev is? A friend of mine, who had never even heard of this guy before, came across him on Twitter and had blocked him within a week. My friend never blocks ANYONE. That is how insufferable Dev is.
"Talking about principles here buddy" The smug condescension coupled with the absolute LACK of principles in general from Dev still baffles me to this day.
You should contact her personally, explain exactly who Dev is and what that _thing_ has done, and advise her to permanently ban him. No good can come from granting Dev company, because he is irredeemably evil.
@@DaMaster012 I think guy goes around YT streams and does the same to others. I think he looks for good press from small streamers that don't know of drama.
Funny he is crying about full context when he's taken Kirsche out of context along with his her Destiny. Oh no! Poor Devy schnoodles is getting attacked, and people don't provide the full context! What is the full context, Dev? Maybe you shouldn't have nuked the streams with the full context to hide it.
"Bad faith" and "tAkEn oUt oF cOnTeXt" are just shorthand terms Dev's fake back on to say "any irrefutable truth that reveals what a terrible person I am is bad."
The whole pdf file thing basically confirms that Dev didn't actually care/basically endorsed it when his mod was harassing Kirsche THEN tried pretending to be the victim in that whole situation.
Dev once again losing the debate with himself from 2 hours ago. It never gets old. Also- Dev's refusal to ban PDFs and groomists from his server needs to be looked into further. For a supposedly 'principled' man, his principles are extremely suspicious in this case.
I super chatted to him this in the last Archcast and he still shrugged it off, claiming the clips were out of context. The only way you could provide more context would be to okay his entire video with it broken up to insert your segments.
@@Sujad If you keep going back, it's never just 'the' exception, it becomes 'an' exception. I'd second what someone else said. Unsubscribe from Arch. If you really want to support Arch for being Arch, give him another chance in a year or two, that's generous after at least half a year of spitting in your face and betraying his principals that he's pushed on his audience. Anything informative from Archcast, you'll get elsewhere just fine.
10:09 He said "i'm talking about principles here buddy". In other words he believes being consistent about not banning people for doing shady things outside his server (like his mod harrassing Kirsche) is more important than to knowingly allow a child predator associate with him and his server. He is morally bankrupt. If your principles dictate that you openly associate with nonces just because they haven't commited a crime in your presence then you need to reexamine your principles.
I can't tell if Lumi from Arch cast is just dumb or disingenuous? She likes Kierche but wonders why she can't ever go back to the Archcast, and now this?
I feel like half this video is Dev unironically comparing child grooming to being gay. Yes, you should always remove the pdf files from your community. No, you should not ban the homosexuals or bad drivers from your community. Dev being unwilling to admit theee is a moral differnce between child grooming and other crimes or even non crimes is shocking
11:11 - Dev is quite literally conflating pedophilia with petty theft. So Dev is either arguing in bad faith (an accusation that WOULD get you banned, and is therefore presumably worse than being a pedophile in his eyes), or he really does think that they're equivalent.
Seeing this made me realize it's not that Dev doesn't want to ban people for things they did outside his server but that he didn't want to ban a friend and is too much of a coward to say it and made himself look worse in the process.
So close... If Dev doesn't want to ban friends, and chooses to remain friends with people even after learning they're a PDF, *then what does that tell you about Dev?*
@@DaMaster012 I should have been a bit more clear. I know that he's an evil piece of 5hit no matter what but I guess what I'm asking is why couldn't Dev do anything else other than essentially advertise that his server is a safe haven for p3d0s? I mean at the very least if he had done anything else an argument could be made that he's in denial about this guy but no he didn't he not only fully admits that he knows one of his moderators is a convicted ch0m0 but that other pdf's are welcome so long as they don't discus their crimes on his server. so yeah I'd say this tells me that either he is one himself or he's a sociopath.
Damn, never saw the full PDF file clip. I'm disgusted by such self avowed nimbyism and a total lack of understanding for freedom of association and one's own need for social respectability. Stop asking for more context Dev it's not gonna help ya. 😂
Dev always poisoning the well against his his detractors with people like Arch and Lumlum. He can't actually defend his words or actions so he has to lie. And they'll believe him and even if chat argues against his lies he'll move goalposts and try and talk around or straight up just insult and call the chatter a liar.
I think I understand what Dev's (misguided) mindset here is regarding not banning his PDF file friend. In the past, he's been vocally against sites banning users from their platform for breaking ToS on other websites. But he thinks that situation is comparable to someone he knows doing something bad outside of his server, which it isn't. Some political streamers/youtubers do this thing where they don't want to seem hypocritical in their own eyes and die on hills that they think is noble and aligns with their beliefs, when all it does is shoot them in the foot and makes them look bad both in and out of context. And because of their stubbornness, they stick to their guns and spiral into being overly defensive, antagonistic, and arrogant instead of apologizing (which they see as weakness). This is what happens when you view yourself as an intellectual figure for so long without much (if any) humility and/or self-awareness.
Dev has straight up said on his Twitter that he would rather live under the governments of the USSR and the NSDAP than with no government at all. The one and only thing preventing Dev from being the one who knarked on Ann Frank is the fact that he wasn't the one living next door to where she was hiding.
According to Dev, no one should ever need to have a background check before being hired. After all, how do you know they'll do anything wrong based on their previous behavior, or that which they do in other environments?
Wow, I didn't realize Dev is this devoid of morality. So since he conflates the concept of justice with whatever a criminal justice system of a state he plays bootlicker for decides, what happens when you are stranded on an island with Dev? No state to rule on what is just or unjust anywhere, so anything goes? I wouldn't ever turn my back to Dev, he's a sociopathic monster.
Dev, you have more double standards than CM Punk and Tiffany Henyard. You could have stopped while you had a slight advantage, but then again you’re a modern Canadian, Dev…….
Banning someone for offsite behavior is basically banning someone for an unspoken rule. Some of these rules aren't written because they know it will get them scrunity. Twitch will ban anyone who dares goes against the alphabet soup, thus making it a de facto rule that you cannot question or oppose the alphabet soup. These are scummy hidden rules because you're hiding something you know will anger and alienate a large portion of your community. However, sometimes these rules aren't explicitly written because they really shouldn't have to be. If someone is picking fights or doing shady things that hurt another community, why would you welcome that behavior into yours? [User @DarkGrif made an excellent comment about not letting people who crap in other pools into their own because no way will the risk of those people crapping in their pool be taken]. And, posting a rule like "No grooming children" will raise some eyebrows and make people wonder why that rule even exists in the first place (see also the "please do not announce when you are going to pleasure yourself" Discord meme). Regardless of motive, by not banning someone for something, you're saying you're okay with that behavior in your community. I've heard "You get what you tolerate" a lot recently, and if Dev tolerates this stuff in other people's communities, then those monsters will think it's okay to do it in Dev's community (and will have an opportunity to hurt someone before being caught).
The idea that you can be aware that a predator is a part of your community, and is grooming and abusing children, but since it's not in YOUR discord server, then it's okay, free speech or something I guess.
Don't worry the Day of the Rake is going to come sooner given Dev's hippocritical behaviour and more people noticing.... I'll call my US Army veteran friend Nate.
10:30 as cringe as it may make me look, calling out fallacies is important to dissect Dev's weird argument here. Dev utilizes the "slippery slope" fallacy and what I would informally call a "line or distinction" fallacy. These are the appeals of someone who seemingly doesn't understand situations can be judged on a case by case basis. The principle of "Free Speech" doesn't require you to allow predators in your discord. Not even the most devoted libertarian would make that argument.
It's also really weird because Discord is known for being a place where pedos operate. If someone commits a DUI, that's bad, but the risk that they convince a stranger online to drink while drunk is close to non-existent. Even without the disgust response banning known pedos from servers is the logically moral thing to do, just the same as banning habitual drunk drivers from driving cars without the breathalyzer thingie.
It is worth pointing out that Dev being Anti-Cancel Culture and Pro-Free Speech is utterly nonsense. Dev is perfectly fine with banning people for off server behavior such as criticizing him, so him not wanting to ban pedos is really just because the pedos haven't slighted him so he doesn't care to ban them, this is just an excuse so he doesn't look bad for not banning pedos.
@@theshadowyparasite9448 That is a good point. The fact Dev will ban people on his discord for calling him bad faith once, but won't ban people for preying on children really shows where his values are. My interpretation is Dev just doesn't see noncery as bad. As one of the oldest watchers of SFO, I can safely say that is not outside Dev's character.
Didn't always agree with him, but still respected his intellectual honesty. Until the past year or two. He's too immature, too egotistical, too in love with "trolling" and "gay ops" and "drama." Instead of either defending his take or admitting he may be wrong, he wants to claim "bad faith" on everyone else's part.
The not banning pedophiles thing is what gets me. You ban people from your community because you do not want to associate with them. I would be banning pedophiles because I do not want to associate with pedophiles. It doesn’t matter whether they do it on or off, your community. His logic makes me think that Dev is OK with pedophiles being pedophiles, they just need to be hush-hush about it so that he doesn’t look like the bad guy for associating with them.
The sheer irony of the fact that the more context that is provided the worse Dev ends up looking. The man really does not know when to shut up, at this point it's less missing context and more shortening a very long list.
Oh, cool so you're from japan or somewhere close to that timezone? Happy New Year to you then. As of the time of me writing this comment, it's 00:52 in Japan.
Dev: "turns out, the best way to get simps to believe obvious, blatant lies is to have their favorite anime girl repeat them" Also Dev: *goes on anime girl podcast to share his obvious, blatant lies because people will believe her if she repeats them*
The "obvious, blatant lies": over three hundred pages documenting the entire years-long campaign of harassment that Dev was complicit in. "Bad faith" in Devonese is "anything that makes me look bad, even if it's true."
Dev has no friends. It is impossible for Dev to have friends. Dev is a malignant, sociopathic narcissist who sees no use for social interaction beyond using others to stroke his own Luciferian ego or as a windmill to tilt against, so it is impossible for him to form the bonds of comraderre required for friendship.
football field of difference between 'I would be hesitant to act if there was no lawful conviction to point to' and 'it doesnt effect me so I dont care'. He could have said the former, he chose to say the latter
I think there is a false equivalency in the minds of people like Dev who, for whatever reason, think that principles can be applied with a bolean doctrine in one's life. Basically, he's a "classical liberal" and a fencesitter, but he thinks that makes him a principled man. He thinks that the persecuted side that is persecuted via guilt by association is the same, no matter what the context, no matter what the details are. He genuinely thinks that the side (the much maligned "far right") that complained about being unpersoned and banned from every public platform turning around and saying "we don't want predos in our discord" is somehow hypocritical. That's wild to me.
Dev isn't a fence sitter, he's an authoritarian statist who masquerades (very poorly) as an "enlightened centrist" to try to lie to everyone -- himself included -- that he isn't a tank-driving cheese pizza enthusiast.
"It's none of my business" If someone that works under you, and is known for working with you in any way, goes and starts harrasing people and doing bad things openly. Then YES it is your business, because it affects the perception and profesionalism of your space.
Dev has been on my naughty list since the Kirshe incident and wasn't really winning points before that with his backing of Briana Wu change gears. I watch Archcast for Arch and Arch's continues curr.... I mean education of Lumlum.
Im really hoping that Arch wakes up to Dev, because the scumbag is basically hiding behind the excuse of "see its exactly like what the wokes did to you in Warhammer" while being one of those scumbags himself. And we have the receipts. We know the woke crowd out right photoshopped some of the threads with Arch, and what happened to him is why anyone like that should be stopped with a passion. But Dev is one of those people despite the fake front of him standing up for arch when it happened. But i suspect Arch has the same loyalty problem thats common in my family where you sray loyal even to the most scummy people because you can't bring yourself to reject someone whose been your friend.
@wownice2927 so he says, but he doesn't make his money from RUclips and whatnot he's got entirely different source of income he himself has talked about. and Dev well past the point now that he is negatively impacting that income rather than benefiting it, even early on into these controversies I'd have agreed, but no this is blatantly holding onto the guy out of a sense of loyalty.
"Do we ban people who run gay ops in other communities and not yours"
Yes Dev. Yes. Because I don't want that shit in my community. If they are willing to shit in other peoples pools, they aren't allowed in mine. Because I'm not gonna risk them shitting up my pool.
I to look up what a gay op was, but regardless of whether you support LGB. T or you don't why in the c*** Would you want to legitimize harming people? And so by Dev acting like this and just being nonchalant about it, he's basically complicit in violence against a group of people, no matter whether you agree with the lifestyle or not, that's just messed up..
It also messes up the reputation of your community if that user is seen around in your chat.
Never let a incontinent person swim in your pool. They may say they hold it, but we all know they can't.
The irony is so thick you could walk on it.
@@jaffarebellion292 is it irony or a self call out I wonder?
Dev: "There's 1000 ways to take someone out of context." And he knows and practices all of them personally.
Such was pretty much my first thought, too. So freakin' glorious that the one who so despises being called 'bad faith' would imply they know way too many ways to do so.
"Sir, your son bully's other children at school. We have evidence of of him teasing students, starting fights, and stealing lunch money."
"WELL HE BEHAVES HIMSELF AT HOME AND HE'S RESPECTFUL TO ME, SO ITS NOT MY PROBLEM!"
That's a really good analogy.
@zacharyrollick6169 unfortunately, also very real.
No, it's not. My child is my responsibility. A better analogy would be your employee or client. It's not your business until people make it your business. Aka cancel culture.
Would you keep a guy as an employee if you knew he was grooming kids during off hours?
@@AntiCookieMonster
>not wanting to associate with diddlers = cancel culture
I like how you pre-empted him a week ago saying you knew he'd claim you took him out of context, put a 5-minute uncut clip at the end showing the full context, and then Dev says you took him out of context. Absolute baller.
NPCs have behaviors that are easy to predict.
He scared of Mister Metokur because he tried to get dox and got caught by it.
Thats the gotcha he did in one of his videos when talking about trump/biden and called people idiots for too. What is happening to this guy...?
@@mrblooper1994 Maybe it's just a mask coming off. He can't pretend being some bogus "centrist" anymore.
@@mrblooper1994 TDS. Also his obsession with the transformers.
ah yes, Kirsche the one who provided receipts and some people called her crazy schizo for keeping them
The female judge kavenaugh
"Where is the proof?"
>shows the proof
"You are a schizo"
I really dont know what else anyone could do in that situation besides letting that person scream into a wall.
And she's still respects Josh Moon even though she knows one day she's going to have a thread on the Kiwi Farms on her stupid shit said she's not dumb about it and differences they're going to make it funny and kinda true unlike Dev mods.
Kiwi Farms already does that.
To be fair Kirsche calls herself a crazy schizo with quite a lot of conviction
The fact that Dev almost immediately compares child grooming to petty theft and DUI os disgusting
He's canadian. They all think that way
Someone alert kiwi farms
@@subjectnivleis7572he's already has a thread and he tried to the derail it got thread ban for it by Josh Moon himself even call him a bundle of sticks to his face.
Makes you wonder why.
They are the same to him...
Dev lies as easily as he eats. Not breathes, mind you, because I suspect he may find that difficult.
He wakes up every morning with a demon sitting on his chest, feeding him slop and suffocating him while whispering "it's all bad faith" in his ear.
Well, he does look like pre-weightloss Nikocado Avocado, so it's probably pretty hard to breathe in comparison
Dev seems like he'd turn down three privately owned boats offering to rescue him from a flood because he's sure the government will save him.
So I can't wait until Trudeau loses his spot in the government how is he going to handle it how is he going to cope and seethe.
It's actually really ironic considering there's a meme about a very religious person turning down a firefighter, police officer, and a good Samaritan because their God will save them. When they get to heaven and ask why god didn't save them he responds he sent all three.
Dev and a lot of leftist refuse to admit they've made the state into God so the state can do no wrong in their eyes because clearly the all powerful being they worship can do no wrong.
Nice callback to Dev worships the state.
He’s been taken care of his whole life. He’s an unhealthy socially awkward loner in Canada. Bro has been supported his whole existence.
I'd love for Dev to explain the context of him lying about Corey Comperatore being a Putin supporter.
Dev: "Well you see, he was at a Trump rally, therefore bad and deserving of sland-I mean EVEN HANDED coverage to balance out the praise he's receiving."
And even if he did, that's not a reason for a man to be murdered in front of his family.
That would require that Dev admit two things: that (a) he was wrong about something, and (b) admit that he was lying when he said he was fine with edgy jokes.
@@Barkanine Well, "edgy" by Facebook meme standards, but your point still stands.
The context is, there was a tweet asking whom one would save from a burning building.
The options were, I think, Biden, some other Dem, and Putin.
CC replied Putin.
Mind you, this was, if memory serves, back in 2021.
Yes, really.
i do like how Lum Lum has actually damned Dev in that clip. If he wants to try to provide proof Ace, Aydin, etc are lying about him, he now needs to provide the entire discord conversation and not just snippets where he lies by omission or structure.
Lumi knows what she's dealing with, but is way nicer than any of us in interacting with that greasy shitweasel.
Dev ironically trashed on Vtubers in the past. Ironic considering where and who he made the remarks to.
By now there should be enough to make a "Dev is actually evil" video the same as was done for Vaush.
gotta put some kind of qualifier in there like "unabashedly," or "undeniably" just to sell it.
He’s already got one
m.ruclips.net/video/bnMSPpGyC0o/видео.html&pp=ygUZZGV2IGlzIHVuaXJvbmljYWxseSBldmVpbA%3D%3D
@@Mis73rRand0m Onthologicly, just to be super pretentios.
I want Bunjee to make a video on Dev
Ace did one a while back.
Lots of us left that stream as soon as Devon came on. We were exited for a solo Lumicast. And it just didn't happen.
I honestly like her, but I judge people by the company they keep.
@@zacharyrollick6169 meh, she is using Arch as much as he is using her. Plus her own podcast is nice but is very vtuber focused so is not for everyone
@@zacharyrollick6169I would more so judge them for the company they keep if they don't push on said person's BS and not try to help the person get better.
Hate dev.
Anybody who is friends with Dev should have their hard drives checked.
10:39 Yes Dev, we do start banning puppy killers, child molesters and those doing gay ops. The most insulting thing to the concept of principles is saying you have principles at all.
In Dev's latest video there was more venom to Christians under surface than at a cobra convention. I think this is his biggest stumbling block he can't get over; he thinks evangelicals are ALL out to take away his video games when really it was a VERY small group behind the moral panic that roped others in.
Very good point. Might even be his stumbling block with conservatives in general.
Don't forget the media and dems where also behind the anti video game hate mob
YES! Precisely! My mom is as much a Bible thumper as the most devout of them yet was NOT on board with the anti-Harry Potter book bans. She gave them a chance first before concluding one way or the other.
She's of the same mind as the judge that stated: "You'll know it when you see it."
Her only censorship was preventing us, her children, from consuming damaging materials.
It wasn't even just the evangelicals, unless Dev wants to pretend that people like Hillary Clinton and Tipper Gore were devout and upstanding Christian women in the 80s and 90s.
If anything their zeal contributed to why the games were so good, they wanted to make satanic shit the best to prove le Christians wrong, and damn were the games good.
I still find it almost unbelievable that not only would dev equate pdf activities to shoplifting or a DUI but that he can't seem to grasp that a pdf in a discord server is a present and real danger to the others on the server.
He knows, he just doesn't care.
*Because he is one.*
At 11:15 Dev compares someone approaching kids to someone being a petty thief because they're both against the law. Then he uses that leap to imply the thief was poor and that'd end up as "ban all poor people". With this and his constant references to the courts and their decisions it's like he has no values of his own and only bases his morals off of the law. He also seems to think because he isn't in law enforcement that he doesn't need to uphold morality personally. What a morbid mindset
Wtf
That kind of legal relativism explains why he thinks Jan 6th is on par with treason.
As Ace has stated before, the State is Dev's God.
You're just one step off, unfortunately. It's not 'the law' that Dev worships so clearly but 'the state' in stead, the ones who make, interpret, and enforce the laws however they deem fit. It's why, as Ace points out, even when the state is breaking the laws they have themselves made Dev will still defend the state because the state claims it's in the right to do so.
Poor Lumi. Having to interact with this Canadian trashbag. my heart goes out to her.
Terrible what they are doing to her.
i felt bad for her at first, but she still chose to do the archcast and not really get on dev for some of his shit like vee
Not sure what being Canadian has to do with him being a bad person, that part is uncalled for.
He'd be a trash bag if he was from another country, being Canadian had nothing to do with it lol.
@@gothicpando it arch fault for leaving her alone with dev’s bullshit
Dev uses dsp tactics of accusing people taking him out of context when there is no context to begin with.
Or the context makes it even worse like with Vaush
Dev has become the dsp of political commentary
The vacuous Canadian skid. Re: Justin Zoolandeau, PM
@@johnharker7194 except DSP isn't as bad as Dev. Dev legitimately belongs in a wood chipper feet first.
Bad Faith Dev.
By this point it’s intentionally dishonest Dev.
Bad Faith Diddler
@@zzodysseuszz Evil dev.
You're banned
BANNED
Lum Lum already knows how full of shit Dev is, even Occo brings up from time to time that Dev kept teasing that he had Metokur’s dox and Mizu destroyed Dev. Occo has that Metokur video in the holster btw so anytime Dev denies that happened then he knows he’ll get exposed.
He still scared of Daddy Jim.
Dev lives in fear of a Meto-mauling.
The same guy that took Kirsche out of context, and then lied about doing that, is now claiming that ackshually everyone else is taking him out of context? Sounds kinda bad faith, Dev.
With all this critic on Dev, I wonder if he will try to evade it all by transitioning. It will be funny.
Then how is he gonna do "it" with Lilith?
@@neutronshiva2498 Will probably keep his junk but go one HRT he already has boobs thanks to his weight, after all.
@@neutronshiva2498He's gonna be one of those pre-operation types.
Unfortunately for him, that will only make him a magnet for ridiculing.
the Ethanisonline strategy, classic.
Dev: You have to show the full convo to get the full context. Ace shows the full convos and the full video clips. Dev: now Your just bad faith... So by playing by Dev's rules if You speak out against him Your bad Faith no matter how pruth You have that Dev is a 2 faced snake
Don't show receipts: out of context
Do show receipts: gay ops
well if ace is claiming dev supports p3d0s then yeah that would be bad faith
@@wtf1a1aAce doesn't claim Dev is complicit with PDFs, Ace provides irrefutable proof of Dev, in his own words, saying he's perfectly fine to allow PDFs in his Discord server, even knowing full well they're PDFs. The full clip, played with full context, of Dev saying exactly that, is at 7:57.
Bad faith is Dev slandering Uzala and Aydin as PDFs with no proof, desktop the objective, immutable fact that Dev is perfectly fine with keeping company with PDFs.
@@DaMaster012 pretty sure dev also said he trys and keeps his discord as free speech as possible. so in a weird way check outs even if opticaly its bad
Dev lied?
I'm shocked, shocked! Well not that shocked.
Futurama will always be a quote machine.
Actually not shocked, he lies more than breathes.
@squatchhammer7215 quoting futurama.
@Ban-Milk-Enjoyer i know. I just am so tired of dev's hippo like fecal flinging that didn't even compute till you replied.
The problem with Dev's position on the whole "not banning pedos" thing is that there is an actually principled way to come to the non-action that he has decided, but Dev is such a bad faith actor that he isn't being principled. He's being apathetic. The context shows his first reaction was literally "I don't care."
From what I've seen the only explanations that seem possible is that Dev is either an actual psychopath, as in actually lacks the ability to understand other people's perspective, or he is just a bad faith actor who will lie whenever it is convenient for him.
-Folks demand Dev to remove pedos from his community
-Dev then 'what abouts' by comparing grooming minors to shoplifting
The absolute state of canadians.
The biggest problem is his blatant hypocrisy, as he has and likely continues to ban people for off server actions, or even just being in a server he hates.
He doesn't ban the PDFs when they're sucking off his ego and giving him things.
Even psychopaths can have moral standards. He doesn't even get THAT as an excuse.
Did the blob made the response video?
Not yet
@@ACE1918Dev is too busy eating, being hypocritical and/or being in a diabetic coma to do so.
It's gonna be another trucker vid.
It will be next after the trucker video
He’ll release it when the Trucker video comes out
Every time I watch that clip, I'm struck with the thought of "Why is it so difficult for you to be staunchly against child endangerment? Are YOU one of them Dev? Should we be starting criminal investigations into you? Why can't you be, simply and unabashedly, AGAINST pdfiles? Why is nuance even NECESSARY?"
Exactly, I mean it would be a bit different if Dev said if didn't know they were doing that off his server. Or if he couldn't confirm if the accusation were true about them doing that. Then that would be a more nuanced approach.
But Dev didn't, he openly said that even having full knowledge they were doing that(and the full criminal act),he would still continue allowing them on his server. And that doesn't bode well on Dev already poor character and make him very suspect.
Because in his mind, since he already allowed his mod to harrass Kirsche, and his justification is that he didn't broke his server rules, he should uphold that justification for everything.
Otherwise he is a hypocrite for not stoping the harrasment, and then he has to find other ways to sound smart and not admit guilt.
But he is so full of himself, he doesn't care this position makes him allow child predators to have access to his comunity, because like he said "it's not my responsibility". He doesn't care, he is morally bankrupt.
Giving who he orbits and hangs around breadtube? Yes. He probably is.
@@MisterGreis Birds of a feather, flock together as they say.
A day in the life of Dev:
-Wakes up
- Falls out of bed, crashing through the floor due to him being fat
- Eats
- Goes to the computer
- Looks at the folder titled 'Trucker Video'
- Decides now is not the time, it is time to eat
- Goes to twitter
- Spends the next four hours telling you "I didn't insult Corey Comperatore and his family" whilst then proceeding to insult Corey Comperatore and his family
- Eats
- Spends the next three hours on twitter saying "but the other side is equally as bad!"
- Eats
- Goes back to the computer
- Looks at the folder titled 'Ace Response Video'
- Decides now is not the time, it is time to stream and eat
- Streams for a few hours, making sure to block anyone who points out problems with his discord
- Goes back to bed
Rinse, repeat
How long have you been studying this elusive creature?? 😂
Needs more periods dictated to solely eating.
My God, nobody should know these habits so well. Lol
Is this livesindevswalls alt account?
Unrealistic, he doesn't eat 5 times a day, he just doesn't stop. He snacks all day continuously on Cheeto Puffs.
This is insane. Literally every time Ace covers Dev he always brings extensive receipts to highlight Dev’s hypocrisy and what not.
On a side note I am wondering how exactly Dev plans on making his response video, especially when it comes to Ace, Aydin Paladin and Uzalu. Here’s my prediction: Dev will try and paint Ace as a scorned ex fan and will lie by omission with Aydin and Uzalu because there is no way he can be honest about the story with Aydin and Uzalu and look good.
With Aydin it's possible for him to start off looking good as she technically did "leak dms" but it's such an *erm* *ackshualee* level technicality that it'll make him look petty at best and bad faith at worst.
Considering all he'll need to cover in it I put my money on the latter, making him look even worse.
Build of you to assume that Dev is telling the truth when he says he's working on a response video...
Get canadian healthcare - Based Rabbit
TDD Rabbit
@@jaibonaparte TDD is a made up term when you have Recipts to back up the hate. Dev is a pos human being. but i expect nothing less from a Fascist
Dev's been on my enemy list since the Pikamee/Hogwarts Legacy incident.
He's such an unrepentant snake and malicious psychopath.
There's a thousand ways to be bad faith... and dev has mastered them all
Dev is king of the strawmen.
I stopped watching Arch because he refuses to recognize his audience hates him and well now the audience is starting to hate Arch now too.
He knows everybody hates Dev he is just milking him for super chats and will throw him away once hes dry
@@dejannincic9671 Well I am not going to stick around just so he can profit off the bad faith content. On some level that makes Arch worse than Dev.
@@RoxasNobody000 Lets hope he realizes soon that Dev aint worth it anymore
@@RoxasNobody000Arch has become nothing but a tofu interpretation of Keemstar, and Dev is his Boogie.
"to be band from a community you have to brake the rules of that community"
aperently being a pedo is not a rule break in Devs community
But criticizing Dev off platform or simply being in a server of people he hates is a banable offence. Makes you wonder.
Dude is a troon chaser comes with the territory.
Guess we have to assume that everyone in Dev's discord server is a pdf-file, since he condones their behavior if it "doesn't happen on his server". Dev doesn't understand that being a NIMBYist is a bad thing, and proudly proclaiming it was one of the funniest self-owns in his repertoire. And that's saying something.
People seem to forget that NIMBY was never about allowing things to happen elsewhere. NIMBY has always been "that isn't allowed, ESPECIALLY not around me."
Dev talking about taking someone taking him out of context after deceptively clipping Kirsche out of context regarding edgy jokes after a tragedy is laughable. Just one example of many that sprung to mind. It's wild how much of an unrepentant snake he is.
Wanna know how awful Dev is? A friend of mine, who had never even heard of this guy before, came across him on Twitter and had blocked him within a week. My friend never blocks ANYONE. That is how insufferable Dev is.
"Talking about principles here buddy"
The smug condescension coupled with the absolute LACK of principles in general from Dev still baffles me to this day.
Ironic for Dev to say say when he does that to Kirsche
I seen Dev lurking in smal Vituber chat wanting her to do reaction video of his gooner gate video.
You should contact her personally, explain exactly who Dev is and what that _thing_ has done, and advise her to permanently ban him.
No good can come from granting Dev company, because he is irredeemably evil.
@@DaMaster012 I think guy goes around YT streams and does the same to others. I think he looks for good press from small streamers that don't know of drama.
Even worse, Dev constantly argues in bad faith.
Then says anyone who argues in bad faith is evil
I think the worst thing about Dev is probably him being a pdf file.
Funny he is crying about full context when he's taken Kirsche out of context along with his her Destiny.
Oh no! Poor Devy schnoodles is getting attacked, and people don't provide the full context!
What is the full context, Dev? Maybe you shouldn't have nuked the streams with the full context to hide it.
"Bad faith" and "tAkEn oUt oF cOnTeXt" are just shorthand terms Dev's fake back on to say "any irrefutable truth that reveals what a terrible person I am is bad."
The whole pdf file thing basically confirms that Dev didn't actually care/basically endorsed it when his mod was harassing Kirsche THEN tried pretending to be the victim in that whole situation.
Dev once again losing the debate with himself from 2 hours ago. It never gets old.
Also- Dev's refusal to ban PDFs and groomists from his server needs to be looked into further. For a supposedly 'principled' man, his principles are extremely suspicious in this case.
I mean Dev defended Foodshops someone who outright admitted they consume loli.
I super chatted to him this in the last Archcast and he still shrugged it off, claiming the clips were out of context. The only way you could provide more context would be to okay his entire video with it broken up to insert your segments.
I did not expect my super chat to lead in this video.
Look you gotta stop sending superchats to Dev and expecting a good faith answer at this point. Also give Arch the stick.
@@arkoa0000 I already do that. No super chats when Dev is there. That one was the exception.
@@Sujad unsub from Archcast. You're only throwing more wood on the fire.
@@Sujad If you keep going back, it's never just 'the' exception, it becomes 'an' exception. I'd second what someone else said. Unsubscribe from Arch. If you really want to support Arch for being Arch, give him another chance in a year or two, that's generous after at least half a year of spitting in your face and betraying his principals that he's pushed on his audience. Anything informative from Archcast, you'll get elsewhere just fine.
Imagine having ANY response to "Hey there's PDFs in your discord." other than "Oh yikes let me boot them immediately."
I would say that reacting by checking the evidence first then doing the reaction would be the more correct reaction.
I bet he doesn’t even thank the bus driver…
I bet he needs help to get on the bus. Stairs are quite an obstacle for fat otakus.
Suffer Dev
If he suffers he can always sign up for MAID.
@neutronshiva2498 ahahah nice
Unironically, Dev is demonstrating why the saying-
"You're judged by the company you keep."
Is so important...
If Dev is equating pedophilia to shoplifting, I guess that means that he thinks that's it's not a big deal?
That's a yikes from me Dev.
10:09 He said "i'm talking about principles here buddy". In other words he believes being consistent about not banning people for doing shady things outside his server (like his mod harrassing Kirsche) is more important than to knowingly allow a child predator associate with him and his server.
He is morally bankrupt. If your principles dictate that you openly associate with nonces just because they haven't commited a crime in your presence then you need to reexamine your principles.
I can't tell if Lumi from Arch cast is just dumb or disingenuous? She likes Kierche but wonders why she can't ever go back to the Archcast, and now this?
A little of column A and a little of column B. I think she's hoping to make a moderate name for herself but doesnt want to rock the boat too much.
I dunno... the first thing she did when the Kirsche Doc came out was make a stream and shit all over it... I would not trust her more than Dev, tbh
@Sujad To bad, she shares the same name with Phase Connect's Lumi.
@@ShadowryuuPmP aaaaand unsub.
@@ShadowryuuPmP Link?
SFO's mods actively allowed those types in the server, and defended them, at least back in the old server ~2022
I feel like half this video is Dev unironically comparing child grooming to being gay. Yes, you should always remove the pdf files from your community. No, you should not ban the homosexuals or bad drivers from your community. Dev being unwilling to admit theee is a moral differnce between child grooming and other crimes or even non crimes is shocking
11:11 - Dev is quite literally conflating pedophilia with petty theft. So Dev is either arguing in bad faith (an accusation that WOULD get you banned, and is therefore presumably worse than being a pedophile in his eyes), or he really does think that they're equivalent.
Normal people: "You're not gonna ban the nonce from your server?"
Dev: "Woah, here comes the Woke Right!"
Seeing this made me realize it's not that Dev doesn't want to ban people for things they did outside his server but that he didn't want to ban a friend and is too much of a coward to say it and made himself look worse in the process.
So close...
If Dev doesn't want to ban friends, and chooses to remain friends with people even after learning they're a PDF, *then what does that tell you about Dev?*
@@DaMaster012 I should have been a bit more clear. I know that he's an evil piece of 5hit no matter what but I guess what I'm asking is why couldn't Dev do anything else other than essentially advertise that his server is a safe haven for p3d0s? I mean at the very least if he had done anything else an argument could be made that he's in denial about this guy but no he didn't he not only fully admits that he knows one of his moderators is a convicted ch0m0 but that other pdf's are welcome so long as they don't discus their crimes on his server. so yeah I'd say this tells me that either he is one himself or he's a sociopath.
2:07 "There's a thousand ways to be bad faith towards someone on the internet."
Im sure dev knows through experience.
Damn, never saw the full PDF file clip. I'm disgusted by such self avowed nimbyism and a total lack of understanding for freedom of association and one's own need for social respectability. Stop asking for more context Dev it's not gonna help ya. 😂
"My community is full of bad people, but as long as I have plausible deniability, it's OK!" 🙄
Dev always poisoning the well against his his detractors with people like Arch and Lumlum. He can't actually defend his words or actions so he has to lie. And they'll believe him and even if chat argues against his lies he'll move goalposts and try and talk around or straight up just insult and call the chatter a liar.
8:52 He unironically did the Akilah Obviously "I don cae, dey no my kiiids."
You know how with some hard to understand people there's more to them than meets the eye? With dev, there's less.
SFO claims to be an atheist, but he sure is full of a ton of faith: BAD FAITH.
I think I understand what Dev's (misguided) mindset here is regarding not banning his PDF file friend. In the past, he's been vocally against sites banning users from their platform for breaking ToS on other websites. But he thinks that situation is comparable to someone he knows doing something bad outside of his server, which it isn't. Some political streamers/youtubers do this thing where they don't want to seem hypocritical in their own eyes and die on hills that they think is noble and aligns with their beliefs, when all it does is shoot them in the foot and makes them look bad both in and out of context. And because of their stubbornness, they stick to their guns and spiral into being overly defensive, antagonistic, and arrogant instead of apologizing (which they see as weakness).
This is what happens when you view yourself as an intellectual figure for so long without much (if any) humility and/or self-awareness.
Dev: * says something communist *
also Dev: "I was taken out of context!"
the context: * Dev saying other things 1000x even more communist *
Dev has straight up said on his Twitter that he would rather live under the governments of the USSR and the NSDAP than with no government at all.
The one and only thing preventing Dev from being the one who knarked on Ann Frank is the fact that he wasn't the one living next door to where she was hiding.
Bad Faith Dev strikes again.
Dev: For my friends the wall. For my enemies the law.
According to Dev, no one should ever need to have a background check before being hired. After all, how do you know they'll do anything wrong based on their previous behavior, or that which they do in other environments?
Wow, I didn't realize Dev is this devoid of morality. So since he conflates the concept of justice with whatever a criminal justice system of a state he plays bootlicker for decides, what happens when you are stranded on an island with Dev? No state to rule on what is just or unjust anywhere, so anything goes? I wouldn't ever turn my back to Dev, he's a sociopathic monster.
Dev, you have more double standards than CM Punk and Tiffany Henyard.
You could have stopped while you had a slight advantage, but then again you’re a modern Canadian, Dev…….
Remember, people, Arch only deserves the stick when the communist is on. No donations and downvote only.
For someone who knows about lore and history, Arch sure is extra retarded in regards to the commie-cucknadian
Yeah, well, he'll never not get stick from me now. Unsubbed and set his channel to "Do not recommend" months ago.
@@deboshadow just unsub from Archcast. Keep to his lore channel if you want.
i do enjoy his other works, Arch, that is, so I just enjoy those and stick the rest.
The scrap of a carrot between beatings I'll say
Can somebody put together a list of everyone who's friends with Dev so I know who to avoid?
Banning someone for offsite behavior is basically banning someone for an unspoken rule.
Some of these rules aren't written because they know it will get them scrunity. Twitch will ban anyone who dares goes against the alphabet soup, thus making it a de facto rule that you cannot question or oppose the alphabet soup. These are scummy hidden rules because you're hiding something you know will anger and alienate a large portion of your community.
However, sometimes these rules aren't explicitly written because they really shouldn't have to be. If someone is picking fights or doing shady things that hurt another community, why would you welcome that behavior into yours? [User @DarkGrif made an excellent comment about not letting people who crap in other pools into their own because no way will the risk of those people crapping in their pool be taken]. And, posting a rule like "No grooming children" will raise some eyebrows and make people wonder why that rule even exists in the first place (see also the "please do not announce when you are going to pleasure yourself" Discord meme).
Regardless of motive, by not banning someone for something, you're saying you're okay with that behavior in your community. I've heard "You get what you tolerate" a lot recently, and if Dev tolerates this stuff in other people's communities, then those monsters will think it's okay to do it in Dev's community (and will have an opportunity to hurt someone before being caught).
Dev doesn't understand that his arguments are taken in bad faith
because he's a bad faith actor.
The idea that you can be aware that a predator is a part of your community, and is grooming and abusing children, but since it's not in YOUR discord server, then it's okay, free speech or something I guess.
The shear shitting temerity of Dev to accuse anyone of "not providing the full context", lol.
I don't like that vtubers keep giving Dev any attention when he talked shit on their entire media form many times.
I'm all for him getting attention if it's of the Pippa flavor. Give him hell, and ban him into orbit. No more "LoOk I'm OnE oF yOu".
Don't worry the Day of the Rake is going to come sooner given Dev's hippocritical behaviour and more people noticing....
I'll call my US Army veteran friend Nate.
Hypocritical but if you are saying hippo cuz he’s fat then okay 😂
Nate the Rake… that legendary name even reached ears overseas.
10:30 as cringe as it may make me look, calling out fallacies is important to dissect Dev's weird argument here. Dev utilizes the "slippery slope" fallacy and what I would informally call a "line or distinction" fallacy. These are the appeals of someone who seemingly doesn't understand situations can be judged on a case by case basis. The principle of "Free Speech" doesn't require you to allow predators in your discord. Not even the most devoted libertarian would make that argument.
It's also really weird because Discord is known for being a place where pedos operate. If someone commits a DUI, that's bad, but the risk that they convince a stranger online to drink while drunk is close to non-existent. Even without the disgust response banning known pedos from servers is the logically moral thing to do, just the same as banning habitual drunk drivers from driving cars without the breathalyzer thingie.
It is worth pointing out that Dev being Anti-Cancel Culture and Pro-Free Speech is utterly nonsense. Dev is perfectly fine with banning people for off server behavior such as criticizing him, so him not wanting to ban pedos is really just because the pedos haven't slighted him so he doesn't care to ban them, this is just an excuse so he doesn't look bad for not banning pedos.
@@theshadowyparasite9448 That is a good point. The fact Dev will ban people on his discord for calling him bad faith once, but won't ban people for preying on children really shows where his values are. My interpretation is Dev just doesn't see noncery as bad. As one of the oldest watchers of SFO, I can safely say that is not outside Dev's character.
The more they complain,
The more they show they have nothing going for them.
(Them is figures this level of controversy)
I fail to see how "not banning pedos from his community" could be taken out of context.
You could post whole 2 hour segment on someone and they'd still be like "you took me out of context bruh" 😂
Didn't always agree with him, but still respected his intellectual honesty. Until the past year or two. He's too immature, too egotistical, too in love with "trolling" and "gay ops" and "drama." Instead of either defending his take or admitting he may be wrong, he wants to claim "bad faith" on everyone else's part.
The not banning pedophiles thing is what gets me. You ban people from your community because you do not want to associate with them. I would be banning pedophiles because I do not want to associate with pedophiles. It doesn’t matter whether they do it on or off, your community. His logic makes me think that Dev is OK with pedophiles being pedophiles, they just need to be hush-hush about it so that he doesn’t look like the bad guy for associating with them.
The sheer irony of the fact that the more context that is provided the worse Dev ends up looking. The man really does not know when to shut up, at this point it's less missing context and more shortening a very long list.
This is a very unusual first video of the year, but i guess I'm starting 2025 with more Dev Dismantlement
Are you a day ahead or something? This is the last video of the year.
@@Yipper64Timezones.
@@Yipper64Let me guess, you are American ?
Hello from the past could you maybe give tomorrows lottos numbers future man?
Oh, cool so you're from japan or somewhere close to that timezone? Happy New Year to you then.
As of the time of me writing this comment, it's 00:52 in Japan.
Bro really came up with "dev derangement syndrome"
The ego
Dev: "turns out, the best way to get simps to believe obvious, blatant lies is to have their favorite anime girl repeat them"
Also Dev: *goes on anime girl podcast to share his obvious, blatant lies because people will believe her if she repeats them*
Double-Standard Dev.
The "obvious, blatant lies": over three hundred pages documenting the entire years-long campaign of harassment that Dev was complicit in.
"Bad faith" in Devonese is "anything that makes me look bad, even if it's true."
Dev's let's his personal drama spill over his friend's podcast.
He has to. Barely anyone watches his.
Dev has no friends. It is impossible for Dev to have friends. Dev is a malignant, sociopathic narcissist who sees no use for social interaction beyond using others to stroke his own Luciferian ego or as a windmill to tilt against, so it is impossible for him to form the bonds of comraderre required for friendship.
Dev even accused Vee of badmouthing him.
Even though, Vee is providing screenshots for context.
"Dev is here, kick him" - most commonly used chat phrase in 2024
and I used to watch him, consistently.
I had to judge myself heavily after that
Don't feel bad i used to watch CNN and Fox news lol i judge myself too
He had some decent videos before. That's before the truckers broke his brain. Or made the mask crack, either or.
football field of difference between 'I would be hesitant to act if there was no lawful conviction to point to' and 'it doesnt effect me so I dont care'. He could have said the former, he chose to say the latter
I think there is a false equivalency in the minds of people like Dev who, for whatever reason, think that principles can be applied with a bolean doctrine in one's life. Basically, he's a "classical liberal" and a fencesitter, but he thinks that makes him a principled man. He thinks that the persecuted side that is persecuted via guilt by association is the same, no matter what the context, no matter what the details are.
He genuinely thinks that the side (the much maligned "far right") that complained about being unpersoned and banned from every public platform turning around and saying "we don't want predos in our discord" is somehow hypocritical. That's wild to me.
Dev isn't a fence sitter, he's an authoritarian statist who masquerades (very poorly) as an "enlightened centrist" to try to lie to everyone -- himself included -- that he isn't a tank-driving cheese pizza enthusiast.
"It's none of my business"
If someone that works under you, and is known for working with you in any way, goes and starts harrasing people and doing bad things openly.
Then YES it is your business, because it affects the perception and profesionalism of your space.
Dev has been on my naughty list since the Kirshe incident and wasn't really winning points before that with his backing of Briana Wu change gears. I watch Archcast for Arch and Arch's continues curr.... I mean education of Lumlum.
2:48 - Ace talks about me exclusively.
Parasocial relationship achieved!
Im really hoping that Arch wakes up to Dev, because the scumbag is basically hiding behind the excuse of "see its exactly like what the wokes did to you in Warhammer" while being one of those scumbags himself. And we have the receipts. We know the woke crowd out right photoshopped some of the threads with Arch, and what happened to him is why anyone like that should be stopped with a passion. But Dev is one of those people despite the fake front of him standing up for arch when it happened. But i suspect Arch has the same loyalty problem thats common in my family where you sray loyal even to the most scummy people because you can't bring yourself to reject someone whose been your friend.
arch knows about dev but doesnt really care he does it for the money
@wownice2927 so he says, but he doesn't make his money from RUclips and whatnot he's got entirely different source of income he himself has talked about. and Dev well past the point now that he is negatively impacting that income rather than benefiting it, even early on into these controversies I'd have agreed, but no this is blatantly holding onto the guy out of a sense of loyalty.