These divers did never such an important job before in their whole life and mostly never will do again. 3:46 the F-Word shame on the U.S. Navy, maybe we civilize them before giving them such important tasks !!! Only joking great job, keep up the good work for humanity.
bipola telly Huh? I am German. I said they did a good job, I was serious about it. Not only because they did the job right, also they did something very important, much more important then we all can imagine right now, we have to wait for Orions future, then we all will grasp how much important it is. And Fukushima is something very worse, what can happen to every country with atomic power solutions, I lost friends after the 3.11 there, but I am happy we will not have an atomic power solution in Germany in near future they will be all gone :P Hope the USA & Japan would also follow this attitude. So no reasons to make jokes about the Fukushima & the pacific ocean, the soldiers are save there where they are.
Isaac Schmitt I feel I must make a counterpoint to your points on nuclear power. After studying the complexities of energy policy, economic, social, and environmental sustainability in my undergrad years, I have found that there is rarely a simple answer to our current problems of energy needs and environmental impacts. First, environmental damage from radioactive waste leaks is not necessarily geographically or economically limited. Fukushima's disaster released large amounts of radionuclides into the Pacific, and these contaminants are expected to reach U.S. coastlines in 3-5 years via ocean currents (National Geographic Article: @2013). Japanese fisheries have been drastically effected with contaminants as well, causing billions of dollars of losses: trans-regional economic impacts. The Japanese government, as a developed nation, does not have the means of containing the waste, only minimizing damage, and even then not comprehensively. Here in the U.S., as a developed country, we face similar problems. In March 2014, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico (where I live) leaked radioactive materials to the surface. WIPP is located some 2,000 Ft underground in ancient salt beds, and is the only permanent storage facility for low-level nuclear waste in the U.S. (there is currently no permanent storage facility for "hot" waste like spent reactor core rods). The WIPP leak shut down the facility, and a year later cleanup is still inadequate. We do not have adequate means for full recovery after a radioactive leak. (Albuquerque Journal article: @593280). You make a good point about fossil fuels doing permanent global damage, and effecting poorer countries most. If our goal is to only drastically reduce CO2 emissions before the 450 ppm point of no return is reached, then nuclear power may provide a quick-fix. But in the long run, nuclear power is too risky and radioactive waste too damaging over thousands of years to provide a sustainable energy solution. There are alternative ways to reduce CO2 emissions. Our German friend’s country is at the cutting edge of renewable energy policy, research, and implementation. Issues of storage and intermittent supply from wind and solar are indeed problems, but ones that are being solved with hydraulic and synthetic methane gas storage facilities (which are effectively carbon neutral as they can scrub CO2 from the atmosphere. Nature article: www.nature.com/news/renewable-power-germany-s-energy-gamble-1.12755). I just want to stress that these energy challenges are nuanced, and there are always tradeoffs. Nuclear power does supply large amounts of low-carbon energy, but the high risk of catastrophic failure and the unavoidable problems with waste isolation storage makes nuclear power economically, socially, and environmentally unaffordable in the long run. I applaud Germany's Energiewende that, while not perfect, is the proving grounds for the future of renewable energy.
I watched Orion in the sky in the UK coming away from the moon on it's orbital return it looked like as star , still amazing what we can do. Respect to all who are involved.
Every space video I see so special never get I enough to take in. Even watch it sometimes and listen to music I like imagine me travel the space. New rock and legend rock like deltaparole, foo fighter, nirvana, rush.
Although Orion shares its basic principles with Apollo, it's not the same at all. It is bigger and a completely new design. Space buffs should look forward and embrace it instead of reminiscing about the Shuttle. We all liked the Shuttle, but it didn't do much that can't be done with conventional rockets, its specs were based on requirements that do not exist anymore, it never lived up to the financial savings it promised, and compared to all other manned space flight systems it had an appalling safety record. For sustained human activity in space, what is needed is a reliable, versatile system with comparatively low operating costs. The Shuttle could never deliver that, Orion just might.
steve1978ger An intelligent, attitude-free, polite, extremely well written, grammatically correct comment on utoob... Well done sir, you have made this site a better place!
+Scritley He had me too until he said: "Orion just might." What, be a "reliable, versatile system with comparatively low operating costs"? DId ya not notice the only thing that survived was this capsule? Did ya know that approx. 3 humans can fit in a capsule that size, with barely any booty. So what would it be worth to send three people up and down?
+monokhem (" It's going to take people to the dark side of the moon." 'The dark side' doesn't exist. You mean the far side The moon has a day/night cycle. Full moon is day on this side, night on the far side. New moon is night on this side, day on the far side) The Orion will take "us" much further than that. Eventually, if everything goes according to plan, it wil take us to Mars.
monokhem There is always _a_ dark side. But because it always changes not _the_ dark side of the moon. If they go to the dark side when it is new moon it means that they will stay on this side of the moon. The same side where the Apollo's landed. They plan to go beyond the far side no matter wether it's dark or light at that time.
@@billmoran3812 You had a large boat with you most likely. An astronaut is wearing a spacesuit that will drag him down and is sitting in a tiny pod that is rocking, tossing, and turning with every little wave because of how top heavy it is. Adrift. Nobody to reach you for hours. Sure, there were no crew on this flight... but still. Imagine what it’d be like for Mercury, where you have to lean out, grab a hook from a helicopter, help the recovery team attach it, and then they fly off with you and your capsule.
Is that the only tiny bit of spray at 2:01? Clear sea? It looks like it's floating in mercury rather than water at 2:13. Calm sea indeed. Why don't we see the capsule going inside the Anchorage?
I can't imagine the hardships that our service men and women must go through on a constant basis to keep us safe and I'll be forever grateful... but this has got to be a great day on the job for these sailors! Well done!
eleggance he was referring older missions like Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs back in the 60s which were all capsules that landed in the water. After that there was a few Skylab missions and then the Apollo Soyuz test project which was the last time the US had manned capsules that would land and be recovered in the water, After that ended they started work on the space shuttle program which is all we had for about 30 years which landed on a runway
those tiny white leters we see on the capsule is that some heat resistant paint ? and do you know what material that flag is. and i dont see the parachute
I suppose the letters would be heat-resistant. The flag is the same material as the rest of the craft, you can see it's made out of the same individual tiles. The parachute is automatically cut once it has touched down.
Mr Paul Grimm the Orion spacecraft is designed to take humans beyond low earth orbit and more specifically it is designed to take people back to the moon by 2024
It's so amazing and fascinating like a beautiful reptile. And the carrier in which the capsule is drawn in - I watched Star Wars this morning, but this is better. Movies should sometimes show more realistic scenes like the swimming capsule in the water with that authentic water sound or the moment when the boats return into the carrier.
The coolest part of this video was that they freakin winched that thing straight into the ship. I love it, rockets were always better than the space shuttle.
+monokhem had they not decided to switch 100% for the shuttle and discontinue completely Saturn V, they would have been able to lift all of it up in 5 trips instead of 30+. it would have looked massively different tho, with fewer, waaay larger modules. the shuttle was extra cool, but not nearly as efficient as it should have been, not to mention the safety hazard
monokhem the russians built mir without a shuttle, all automatic. could have been done that way, but it wasn't because it was all designed around the shuttle. for the safety concern i wasn't referring to statistics, but more of the design. the way it was done made it more likely to suffer some critical failure, yet there wasn't any way to deal with said failure were they to happen. I like the space shuttle, still like the concept, but it could have been better
nice one ....i am the chief executive of the nasa ....and it is very pleasant to us that .....such types of things also going on in our country (INDIA )....but it is known to aall that beauty. ....is inchant both holder and beholder
I find it amazing that since the 1960s odd the design is still rather the same. Obviously with some new technology added but I was wondering if a new aproach may be taken. Guess not.
Note the burn mark center screen at 2:11 taking the spacecraft back to the technicians who built it, they will be going over every square millimeter, top to bottom to make a performance evaluation. Say hello to our newest spacecraft! The bigger question is, is this spacecraft serviceable, can it be used again. The Apollo spacecraft were a one-shot machine., the heat-shields were of an ablative (Melt away) design. Being that they are using heat tiles similar to the old shuttles, it would seem these machines are considerably more durable.
Only the sides of the capsule were covered with Shuttle type tiles. The actual heat shield on the base was a plain old Apollo style ablative shield. The shield itself cannot be used again, but it is detachable and can be replaced so the capsule can be reused. Despite that, NASA is still looking at a different design for the main heatshield because of the man hours required to make an Apollo style shield.
MuitoDaora I would surmise the re-entry profile would be rather different between the old Shuttle & these capsule style spacecraft. No doubt un-manned craft would again have a different profile (Trajectory) as the G-Loads could exceed that of a Human tolerance, but there still is the heating profile of the craft to consider. A "steep" flight-path no doubt would exceed the temperature AND G-Load capabilities of even the un-manned crafts, both crushing the machine and burning it up to a cinder.
Why are there Tiles on one side of it. Apollo didn't need tiles and Orion is shaped the same so the reentry heating should be the same as well? Just asking, do they perform some sort of reentry maneuvers Apollo never did and so it heats the weighted side much more? Would sure like to know. Thanks
+Sonny Burnett Actually, Apollo also had a thermal protection system on its backshell, but it was metallic, similar in concept to SLA-561V. The backshell also experiences significant thermal loading during re-entry. Orion uses tiles instead of a metallic ablator primarily because it saves weight compared to SLA-561, but there's also the redundancy angle - overkill protection at lower weight = better ability to handle emergencies and high-speed re-entry. Remember that this thing is expected to handle interplanetary re-entry one day, AND its size also increases thermal loads even before we consider the 11+ km/s speed on a Mars return. ALSO: During re-entry, the capsule is actually steerable, so the backshell isn't always presenting the same angle to the stream of plasma ; This is why Apollo command modules are burned unevenly. Check out recovery pictures of Apollo command modules to see what I mean.
Hi, Yes they did. And that's why it's a bit curious that they went the tile route on one side. If you'll recall Apollo also had high entry velocitys approaching that of future Mars returns and they flew a profile that used the skipping stone technique which relieved the heat loads quite well. I suppose if it can handle that with some or more tiles cracked or missing then like you say it's a win win. However, it does seem a bit backwards.
Sonny Burnett [ Hi, Yes they did. And that's why it's a bit curious that they went the tile route on one side.] Ceramic TPS wasn't even developed in the Apollo era ; It's an outgrowth of Shuttle technology. [If you'll recall Apollo also had high entry velocitys approaching that of future Mars returns and they flew a profile that used the skipping stone technique which relieved the heat loads quite well.] They didn't, actually. AGC had the capability but it was never used, because skip re-entry is tricky and dangerous. [I suppose if it can handle that with some or more tiles cracked or missing then like you say it's a win win. However, it does seem a bit backwards. ] Why? If it saves weight, then you have more mass freed up for mission capability, consumables and such. It's not backwards at all, even if it does increase labor requirements for check-outs.
It simply wasn't a "dump and retrieve" mission. This thing came back from orbit, but also from a very hot re entry, and it gave lots of important data on NASAs newest capsule
Great, we've built a slightly larger version of the Apollo Command Module, 55 years after NASA awarded North American Aviation the contract for the above mentioned.
It's a bit larger, the electronics, vastly miniaturized, but still splashes down awaiting pick up by Naval recovery. Pathetic,in an era of post lifting body designs. I admit my bias, I prefer the Dream Chaser.
Yes, land at a facility to quickly turn it around for another mission, whereas the Apollo/Orion technique will require ocean transport, and then refurbishing for another flight.
Nasil indiginin goruntusu yok. ortada parasut yok. daha da enteresani 2000 C olan van elien kusagini bu kapsuldeki camlar erimeden nasil gecti? baska sorum yok.
All this dumb water training exercise--Russia land on dirt! Open capsule door, cosmonaut jump out, drink vodka, eat, nap, get in boat, wait for American capsule.
+datsme Land landings heavily limit the choice of landing sites and return payloads. The Orion capsule itself is not only heavier than the entire Soyuz stack (orbital module, return module and service module + fuel), but it will also be expected to perform return re-entry from the Moon and interplanetary trajectories ; So why complicate re-entry targeting more than it already is?
+Paul Zuk Imagine how many good astronauts will reject a refurbished space vehicle. How many families are we supporting from the shuttle? what is more important than finding water on Mars? ***A: Making saltwater drinkable worldwide; free healthcare and dental in usa. Free 2-3 college, free wireless pacific to atlantic, and an Asian president.
I still don't understand why we complicate stuff. Why don't we land on solid ground and then recover like the Russians? Why add to the cost/complexity?
+radbcc the Soyuz landing is actually a very hard landing. They have to build in "soft landing" jets on the bottom to break its fall right before landing. Also the astronaut/cosmonaut seats have to have special shock absorbers built into them to prevent injury on landing. So if you land in the sea you can just have parachutes and skip all the extra features on the spaceship...that also might fail at some point.
+radbcc. The ocean 70%, is a much larger target to land on then earth 30%, so it allows them a much greater margin of error in case something goes wrong on re-entry.
+radbcc. Brandon said one reason and that's because landing in water is a little bit softer and you don't need the complexity of the rockets firing just before touch down to soften their landing. If those rockets fail, you could have dead or seriously injured crew. Reason 2 is because when you are choosing a landing zone, trying to hit 70% of water is easier than trying to hit 30% of land. Small errors on re-entry can lead to large distances when they finally land.
U.S. Navy divers from USS Anchorage (LPD 23) recover the NASA Orion space capsule after it splashed down in the Pacific Ocean on December 5, 2014.
These divers did never such an important job before in their whole life and mostly never will do again.
3:46 the F-Word shame on the U.S. Navy, maybe we civilize them before giving them such important tasks !!!
Only joking great job, keep up the good work for humanity.
bipola telly its fukushima
bipola telly
Huh? I am German.
I said they did a good job, I was serious about it.
Not only because they did the job right, also they did something very important, much more important then we all can imagine right now, we have to wait for Orions future, then we all will grasp how much important it is.
And Fukushima is something very worse, what can happen to every country with atomic power solutions, I lost friends after the 3.11 there, but I am happy we will not have an atomic power solution in Germany in near future they will be all gone :P
Hope the USA & Japan would also follow this attitude.
So no reasons to make jokes about the Fukushima & the pacific ocean, the soldiers are save there where they are.
Isaac Schmitt I feel I must make a counterpoint to your points on nuclear power. After studying the complexities of energy policy, economic, social,
and environmental sustainability in my undergrad years, I have found that
there is rarely a simple answer to our current problems of energy needs and
environmental impacts.
First, environmental damage from radioactive waste leaks is not
necessarily geographically or economically limited. Fukushima's disaster
released large amounts of radionuclides into the Pacific, and these
contaminants are expected to reach U.S. coastlines in 3-5 years via ocean
currents (National Geographic Article: @2013).
Japanese fisheries have been drastically effected with contaminants as well,
causing billions of dollars of losses: trans-regional economic impacts. The
Japanese government, as a developed nation, does not have the means of
containing the waste, only minimizing damage, and even then not
comprehensively.
Here in the U.S., as a developed country, we face similar problems. In March 2014, the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in New Mexico (where I live) leaked
radioactive materials to the surface. WIPP is located some 2,000 Ft underground
in ancient salt beds, and is the only permanent storage facility for low-level
nuclear waste in the U.S. (there is currently no permanent storage
facility for "hot" waste like spent reactor core rods). The WIPP leak
shut down the facility, and a year later cleanup is still inadequate. We
do not have adequate means for full recovery after a radioactive leak.
(Albuquerque Journal article: @593280).
You make a good point about fossil fuels doing permanent global damage, and
effecting poorer countries most. If our goal is to only drastically reduce CO2
emissions before the 450 ppm point of no return is reached, then nuclear power
may provide a quick-fix. But in the long run, nuclear power is too risky and
radioactive waste too damaging over thousands of years to provide a sustainable
energy solution. There are alternative ways to reduce CO2 emissions.
Our German friend’s country is at the cutting edge of renewable energy policy, research, and implementation. Issues of storage and intermittent supply from wind and solar are indeed problems, but ones that are being solved with hydraulic and synthetic methane gas storage facilities (which are effectively carbon neutral
as they can scrub CO2 from the atmosphere. Nature article: www.nature.com/news/renewable-power-germany-s-energy-gamble-1.12755).
I just want to stress that these energy challenges are nuanced, and there are
always tradeoffs. Nuclear power does supply large amounts of low-carbon energy,
but the high risk of catastrophic failure and the unavoidable problems with
waste isolation storage makes nuclear power economically, socially, and
environmentally unaffordable in the long run. I applaud Germany's Energiewende that, while not perfect, is the proving grounds for the future of renewable energy.
Isaac Schmitt Agreed, and a very good point! Sorry if I came off wrong, I find it a fascinating topic. Thanks for a stimulating conversation!
I watched Orion in the sky in the UK coming away from the moon on it's orbital return it looked like as star , still amazing what we can do. Respect to all who are involved.
I AM NOT INVOLVED WITH THIS GARBAGE EXCEPT HELPING TO FUND IT
YOU COULD CALL ME AN EXECUTIVE PRODUCER, ACTUALLY...
Impressive and awesome. Respect to all those servicemen who put their lives on line in order to have us protected.
You know, this isn't about that. That's a spacecraft. They're recovering a NASA space craft. How is that keeping us protected
WASTE OF MONEY, YOU MEAN
IF I GO JOIN THE NAVY WILL YOU RESPECT ME ?? ? ?? ? ? ? ??
It was decent weather to tow it in….pretty cool and amazing to do something like this
That ship is badass
So glad NASA is still up and running :) We have made some great strides when it comes to space technology.
Are you potty trained yet?
datsme that makes no since
datsme sense
strides, you mean going backwards.
1869 we are riding horses and buggies, and trains. 1969 we are landing on the moon. Odd
Water sound was so relaxing and enjoying.
Indian water is not like that 😂
Every space video I see so special never get I enough to take in. Even watch it sometimes and listen to music I like imagine me travel the space. New rock and legend rock like deltaparole, foo fighter, nirvana, rush.
Although Orion shares its basic principles with Apollo, it's not the same at all. It is bigger and a completely new design. Space buffs should look forward and embrace it instead of reminiscing about the Shuttle. We all liked the Shuttle, but it didn't do much that can't be done with conventional rockets, its specs were based on requirements that do not exist anymore, it never lived up to the financial savings it promised, and compared to all other manned space flight systems it had an appalling safety record. For sustained human activity in space, what is needed is a reliable, versatile system with comparatively low operating costs. The Shuttle could never deliver that, Orion just might.
steve1978ger An intelligent, attitude-free, polite, extremely well written, grammatically correct comment on utoob... Well done sir, you have made this site a better place!
+Scritley He had me too until he said: "Orion just might." What, be a "reliable, versatile system with comparatively low operating costs"? DId ya not notice the only thing that survived was this capsule? Did ya know that approx. 3 humans can fit in a capsule that size, with barely any booty. So what would it be worth to send three people up and down?
+monokhem (" It's going to take people to the dark side of the moon." 'The dark side' doesn't exist. You mean the far side The moon has a day/night cycle. Full moon is day on this side, night on the far side. New moon is night on this side, day on the far side)
The Orion will take "us" much further than that. Eventually, if everything goes according to plan, it wil take us to Mars.
You mean Pink Floyd has been lying to us?!
monokhem
There is always _a_ dark side. But because it always changes not _the_ dark side of the moon. If they go to the dark side when it is new moon it means that they will stay on this side of the moon. The same side where the Apollo's landed.
They plan to go beyond the far side no matter wether it's dark or light at that time.
Cela me remémore apolo tous devant l'écran. Quel chemin depuis. C'est une belle aventure humaine.
That craft is truly a work of art.
Which one? Serious question.
UMM i think the guys on the ship are NPCs
the helecopter
@@MB.543 Orion Spacecraft
@@MB.543 jjjh
Mm6ýýy
imagen working on such a modern vessel to then recover a space capsule. That must be amazing.
All those sailors standing along the edge of the ship to watch the recovery of America's next space vehicle was inspiring.
#Pride
gay
Proton2112 😁😁
+Hammer Lane Bandit gyh
Brian Streufert
Proud of you Mr. Camera Man 👍🏻
The open ocean is fucking terrifying. Can you imagine the miles and miles of ocean underneath that guy in the water?
You only swim on the top. I never could see what the big deal was. I’ve swam many times in open water. It’s beautiful. Nice clear, clean water.
@@billmoran3812 You had a large boat with you most likely. An astronaut is wearing a spacesuit that will drag him down and is sitting in a tiny pod that is rocking, tossing, and turning with every little wave because of how top heavy it is. Adrift. Nobody to reach you for hours.
Sure, there were no crew on this flight... but still. Imagine what it’d be like for Mercury, where you have to lean out, grab a hook from a helicopter, help the recovery team attach it, and then they fly off with you and your capsule.
Is that the only tiny bit of spray at 2:01? Clear sea? It looks like it's floating in mercury rather than water at 2:13. Calm sea indeed. Why don't we see the capsule going inside the Anchorage?
Oh I see, it's pulled in at the end here. v=FrZhbFNL59Q Those sailors don't look like they're pulling very hard!
Oh I see who dropped on your head as a child.
How can guys dislike such historical moment.... shame on you... those who dislike this...
Ya ur correct..
the flat earthers, trolls, bots...
Apart from the flat-Earthers, there are a lot of people who don't like the Orion capsule.
These dislikers are from Pakistan.
Beautiful coverage, thank you to sharing this with the world.
Man that would be so fun recovering a space capsule. What a rush pulling up to the ship at dusk!
wow, that is incredible
Also, the Navy's ship looks amazing!
Huh
नमी कुमार
@@Horriblebastad .
@@Horriblebastad Il Cursa ã Chiagl
The San Antonio Class is a beautiful ship, especially for a Transport.
Good job Navy!, always proud to see our service people working
যে
GET TO WORK, SLACKERS!!!!
Very special day !! Congrats to all who helped!!!!!!
Incredible looking Naval vessel. Looks scary to be out in the middle of the ocean and swim to the capsule, brave folks.
worthy of the daleks
And wel done us proficional navy
I can't imagine the hardships that our service men and women must go through on a constant basis to keep us safe and I'll be forever grateful... but this has got to be a great day on the job for these sailors! Well done!
Killing innocent people, they don't show you that part
@@sak707 brain washed
Lol good luck out there.
I got an advert from Chris Hadfield doing an lecture for MasterClass and honestly that's the best advert I ever got
That was great! I actually almost felt like I was in the water for a minute there.
Like the old times. Getting the capsule
December 2014 is not that old time.. only 5 years ago
@@eleggance We should not go back to capsules, that is what i mean of going back
eleggance he was referring older missions like Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs back in the 60s which were all capsules that landed in the water. After that there was a few Skylab missions and then the Apollo Soyuz test project which was the last time the US had manned capsules that would land and be recovered in the water,
After that ended they started work on the space shuttle program which is all we had for about 30 years which landed on a runway
@@alexisrios2683 we did go back to capsules
those tiny white leters we see on the capsule is that some heat resistant paint ?
and do you know what material that flag is.
and i dont see the parachute
I suppose the letters would be heat-resistant. The flag is the same material as the rest of the craft, you can see it's made out of the same individual tiles. The parachute is automatically cut once it has touched down.
Cool video and all but why am I not seeing Orion towed onto the ship?
Never heard of the Orion project .Is this post space shuttle? Are we going back to a proven design or what?
Mr Paul Grimm the Orion spacecraft is designed to take humans beyond low earth orbit and more specifically it is designed to take people back to the moon by 2024
ازعما شن اللى لقوه فى البحر وفوقه انبولتين ..هناك اسئله كثيره تدور فى رأسى عندما افتح على الفيديوهات التى بغير اللغه العربيه
That million dollar US Navy Classified Hightech industrial camera noise at 2:07
treesniper12 🤣🤣🤣
hmmm iOS
How this capsule keep floating over water 🌊
It's so amazing and fascinating like a beautiful reptile. And the carrier in which the capsule is drawn in - I watched Star Wars this morning, but this is better. Movies should sometimes show more realistic scenes like the swimming capsule in the water with that authentic water sound or the moment when the boats return into the carrier.
Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
OP
How does that opening in the back work? Why doesn't it suck in more water? And isn't kind of dangerous?
awesome footage thanks for sharing such a epic moment.
Did Jebediah boarded that pod?
Rugifighkgh
2:08 someone just had to send a photo home.
Lol, my man must have had the newest water ressistant phone from Samsung. This wasnover 4 years ago!
And also American flag not burn
Isnt there a better way now? Why are we still using the same methods that we did during Apollo? Isn’t that going backwards?
Capsules are the way to go. The shuttle was kinda shit to be honest. It cost a shit ton and took a hell of a lot of time to refurbish.
Just make sure to check if malicious shapeshifting extraterrestrial is onboard
The Student Official not many wil Get that but i did
@@toast6683 hey can you get me a child
Segunda parte? Donde esta? Cuando salen los que están adentro.
Excelente!que buen video,y que bueno saber y ver cómo se hacen estos rescates de las cápsulas espaciales,cuántos recursos tecnológicos!
May you reach the extents of universe ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
I love the water sound.
Me too
@@shahid.yousafzai me too too
Do you wish sometimes that you were born an octopus.
Absolutely amaizing!
Respect from Romania !
Hello, I was in the comment section when I came across yours and i was thrilled to say Hello to you.
The coolest part of this video was that they freakin winched that thing straight into the ship. I love it, rockets were always better than the space shuttle.
+monokhem had they not decided to switch 100% for the shuttle and discontinue completely Saturn V, they would have been able to lift all of it up in 5 trips instead of 30+. it would have looked massively different tho, with fewer, waaay larger modules. the shuttle was extra cool, but not nearly as efficient as it should have been, not to mention the safety hazard
monokhem the russians built mir without a shuttle, all automatic. could have been done that way, but it wasn't because it was all designed around the shuttle. for the safety concern i wasn't referring to statistics, but more of the design. the way it was done made it more likely to suffer some critical failure, yet there wasn't any way to deal with said failure were they to happen. I like the space shuttle, still like the concept, but it could have been better
Fabuleux périple dans l'espace,maintenant çà à l'air au point,l'atterrissage, c'est du grand Art !
Looks so much like the Appolo command module.
I need one of those heat tiles for the front of my motorcycle.
Yes, I was just looking and those tiles are in pretty damned good shape even after re entry.
@@nancyhobson9710 I could get my hands on some silica tiles like the ones one the space shuttle
@@Janpeders24 That's fabulous. Reply to Senna 1993
🏍
nice one ....i am the chief executive of the nasa ....and it is very pleasant to us that .....such types of things also going on in our country (INDIA )....but it is known to aall that beauty. ....is inchant both holder and beholder
Is the Orion Capsule reusable?
Yes.
Good question Dan.
I have been on the Anchorage before. It was going to the LA fleet week
3:29 That guy has a frog instead of a camera on his helmet. Just to let you know.
+ronettreker HaHa... I had to look at it 3 times.
+ronettreker Did some research on Google...apparently that frog is the US Navy Underwater Demolition Team mascot.
fun fact....frogman were used to recover apollo astronauts
And Frogmen are Navy Seals.
ronettrek
njenengan pancen ngeten 👍👍👍👍👍👍 ,alatipun sae sae ,tiangipun puinter puinter...joss ,nderekaken bungah nyawang tiang engkang pinter pinter...🥰🥰🥰
I would like to have one of those awesome reflective heat tiles.
How much would it cost?
Why
Go to work with nasa
We probably couldn't afford one.
Very beautiful sea, they doing their job very smartly
Eyeurituihhdhsygh
Who is watching after Nasa anounced the Artemis program?
2:00 how did the USA flag survived Atmospheric re-entry?
They are fire proof paint
Exactly!
I find it amazing that since the 1960s odd the design is still rather the same. Obviously with some new technology added but I was wondering if a new aproach may be taken. Guess not.
Not needed, the approach taken is determined by physics
What kind of design do you expect genius?
@@russellh8702 Chill tf out, god damn.
do water wont go inside from backside of the ship at 5:09 when opened fully it for the capsule .....how the mechanism works...
Great job. Any one Oct 2019
yess sirrr
Mi
Saddam Hussein?!?
Very intresting video👏 good job. Watching from philippines
Note the burn mark center screen at 2:11 taking the spacecraft back to the technicians who built it, they will be going over every square millimeter, top to bottom to make a performance evaluation. Say hello to our newest spacecraft!
The bigger question is, is this spacecraft serviceable, can it be used again. The Apollo spacecraft were a one-shot machine., the heat-shields were of an ablative (Melt away) design. Being that they are using heat tiles similar to the old shuttles, it would seem these machines are considerably more durable.
Only the sides of the capsule were covered with Shuttle type tiles. The actual heat shield on the base was a plain old Apollo style ablative shield. The shield itself cannot be used again, but it is detachable and can be replaced so the capsule can be reused. Despite that, NASA is still looking at a different design for the main heatshield because of the man hours required to make an Apollo style shield.
EricIrl Can not the tiles support the heat from reentry?
MuitoDaora
I would surmise the re-entry profile would be rather different between the old Shuttle & these capsule style spacecraft. No doubt un-manned craft would again have a different profile (Trajectory) as the G-Loads could exceed that of a Human tolerance, but there still is the heating profile of the craft to consider. A "steep" flight-path no doubt would exceed the temperature AND G-Load capabilities of even the un-manned crafts, both crushing the machine and burning it up to a cinder.
Thanks their safe back to earth... 🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
Is the Orion capsule bigger than the Apollo capsule?
+DJ SCY About 25% bigger.
What’s with all the tiles on the skin of the capsule? Is it reusable?
Sound of water😍
Imagine being some random fish and the fucking Orion spacecraft crashes into the water right next to you
Uh honey. Something just crashed from space.
Fish wife: oh fish frick
Parabéns aos Norte Americanos pelo excelente trabalho de pesquisa espacial..
Why are there Tiles on one side of it. Apollo didn't need tiles and Orion is shaped the same so the reentry heating should be the same as well? Just asking, do they perform some sort of reentry maneuvers Apollo never did and so it heats the weighted side much more? Would sure like to know. Thanks
+Sonny Burnett Actually, Apollo also had a thermal protection system on its backshell, but it was metallic, similar in concept to SLA-561V. The backshell also experiences significant thermal loading during re-entry.
Orion uses tiles instead of a metallic ablator primarily because it saves weight compared to SLA-561, but there's also the redundancy angle - overkill protection at lower weight = better ability to handle emergencies and high-speed re-entry.
Remember that this thing is expected to handle interplanetary re-entry one day, AND its size also increases thermal loads even before we consider the 11+ km/s speed on a Mars return.
ALSO: During re-entry, the capsule is actually steerable, so the backshell isn't always presenting the same angle to the stream of plasma ; This is why Apollo command modules are burned unevenly. Check out recovery pictures of Apollo command modules to see what I mean.
Hi, Yes they did. And that's why it's a bit curious that they went the tile route on one side. If you'll recall Apollo also had high entry velocitys approaching that of future Mars returns and they flew a profile that used the skipping stone technique which relieved the heat loads quite well. I suppose if it can handle that with some or more tiles cracked or missing then like you say it's a win win. However, it does seem a bit backwards.
Sonny Burnett [ Hi, Yes they did. And that's why it's a bit curious that they went the tile route on one side.]
Ceramic TPS wasn't even developed in the Apollo era ; It's an outgrowth of Shuttle technology.
[If you'll recall Apollo also had high entry velocitys approaching that of future Mars returns and they flew a profile that used the skipping stone technique which relieved the heat loads quite well.]
They didn't, actually. AGC had the capability but it was never used, because skip re-entry is tricky and dangerous.
[I suppose if it can handle that with some or more tiles cracked or missing then like you say it's a win win. However, it does seem a bit backwards. ]
Why? If it saves weight, then you have more mass freed up for mission capability, consumables and such. It's not backwards at all, even if it does increase labor requirements for check-outs.
Look how far we have come in 45 years...we can now land a capsule in the ocean and retrieve it! Nice job NASA!
It simply wasn't a "dump and retrieve" mission. This thing came back from orbit, but also from a very hot re entry, and it gave lots of important data on NASAs newest capsule
What a line of work!!
this make me want to play Kerbal Space Program again
Same haha
The Apollo Spacecraft carries a crew of 3.
How many Crewmembers does Orion hold?
7 to Mars... I think
Best Navy in the world, bar none.
Where are the parachutes?
This is cool
were there astronauts in the capsule?
Dont you hate when you fly to your destination and the ground crew is taking a long time to open the airplane door?
That is a uncrewed test flight
Is that the Tardis?
Great, we've built a slightly larger version of the Apollo Command Module, 55 years after NASA awarded North American Aviation the contract for the above mentioned.
It's a bit larger, the electronics, vastly miniaturized, but still splashes down awaiting pick up by Naval recovery. Pathetic,in an era of post lifting body designs. I admit my bias, I prefer the Dream Chaser.
Yes, land at a facility to quickly turn it around for another mission, whereas the Apollo/Orion technique will require ocean transport, and then refurbishing for another flight.
Totally agree.
+Chuck Norris
ฝ
Scott Wolf us gvnmt fault cutting budgets
What ship is that??? Looks gooooddddd
It looks like my bluetooth speaker
Nasil indiginin goruntusu yok. ortada parasut yok. daha da enteresani 2000 C olan van elien kusagini bu kapsuldeki camlar erimeden nasil gecti? baska sorum yok.
Back to splashdown recovery seems we are going retrograde back to the 1960`s :(
Inside Man
You'd rather fly a spacecraft that randomly throws its crew into the Atlantic or spreads them all over East Texas?
NASA’s Space Shuttle replacement 👌🏻💯
Awesome👌👌
Orion spacecraft is awesome 🇺🇸👑💕
God bless you
TONI LONDON hold up I just sneezed and saw this what the heck
Ty
Marshmallow Boy lol
All they did was pick up a spacecraft you dumbfuck
PLutONiuM_ ToaST All you did was make a useless comment “dUmBfUcK”
Well information. Good show.
wow navy😍
Verygood 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏♥️😀
At 1:00 it looks like Mickey Mouse - Disney should pay NASA for the publicity.
really Kool Video, wish they would have shown the Splashdown - two thumbs up
All this dumb water training exercise--Russia land on dirt! Open capsule door, cosmonaut jump out, drink vodka, eat, nap, get in boat, wait for American capsule.
+datsme Land landings heavily limit the choice of landing sites and return payloads. The Orion capsule itself is not only heavier than the entire Soyuz stack (orbital module, return module and service module + fuel), but it will also be expected to perform return re-entry from the Moon and interplanetary trajectories ; So why complicate re-entry targeting more than it already is?
+Paul Zuk Imagine how many good astronauts will reject a refurbished space vehicle. How many families are we supporting from the shuttle? what is more important than finding water on Mars? ***A: Making saltwater drinkable worldwide; free healthcare and dental in usa. Free 2-3 college, free wireless pacific to atlantic, and an Asian president.
datsme I literally have no idea what it is that you just said
+datsme Crazy Socialist Zipper head!
Just wait for the dragon V2 spacecraft and you'll be satisfied
Seen it on Gillian's Island.
I still don't understand why we complicate stuff. Why don't we land on solid ground and then recover like the Russians? Why add to the cost/complexity?
+radbcc the Soyuz landing is actually a very hard landing. They have to build in "soft landing" jets on the bottom to break its fall right before landing. Also the astronaut/cosmonaut seats have to have special shock absorbers built into them to prevent injury on landing. So if you land in the sea you can just have parachutes and skip all the extra features on the spaceship...that also might fail at some point.
Brandon Elliott So? How does that explain the cost and complexity of ocean landing and rescue?
+radbcc. The ocean 70%, is a much larger target to land on then earth 30%, so it allows them a much greater margin of error in case something goes wrong on re-entry.
thats the best answer? come on?
+radbcc. Brandon said one reason and that's because landing in water is a little bit softer and you don't need the complexity of the rockets firing just before touch down to soften their landing. If those rockets fail, you could have dead or seriously injured crew. Reason 2 is because when you are choosing a landing zone, trying to hit 70% of water is easier than trying to hit 30% of land. Small errors on re-entry can lead to large distances when they finally land.
EFT1 was design to test the new heat shields that will be going on Orion.
Go Navy