LEGO Star Wars First Order AT-ST review 😠 75201

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 авг 2024
  • 🟠 Become a supporter on Patreon! / jangbricks
    Join the community for exclusive chat streams, get your minifig added to New Jang City, & more!
    ⏩ LEGO speed builds: / jangbuilds
    ▶️ Chill real-time builds: / purebuilds
    🏙 My LEGO city: youtube.be/channel/UCdgkQ55cD...
    My preferred online shop is Amazon: amzn.to/2qllzg5
    If you use my affiliate links I may get a tiny commission to help keep the channels going!
    More places I shop: jangbricks.com/where-i-shop
    LEGO news & set research: www.Brickset.com
    All comments are moderated to maintain a safe, positive environment. Bad behavior is rejected, abusers are reported & blocked. jangbricks.com/commentpolicy
    ✔️ Answers to Frequently Asked Questions: jangbricks.com/FAQ
    🌐 Web: JANGBRiCKS.com
    📷 Instagram: jangbricks4real
    🐤 Twitter: JangBricks
    👤 Facebook: jangbricks
    All of my verified media accounts: jangbricks.com/verified
    (Assume anything else is fake!)
    The opinions I express are mine and mine alone and not for sale for any price. Ads, when shown, are selected & placed by RUclips itself.
  • РазвлеченияРазвлечения

Комментарии • 2,1 тыс.

  • @JANGBRiCKS
    @JANGBRiCKS  6 лет назад +927

    I thoroughly enjoyed the vast majority of The Last Jedi, which I've seen now *twice* including this scene which I watched carefully. Not including a *removable head* to complete *the actual scene* (and the titular vehicle which appears multiple times *full and complete with head* for longer than its very brief comic relief headless form), while charging the full price of an existing stunningly beautiful and complete walker? Nope. No way I'll get behind that.

    • @JoMotionStudios
      @JoMotionStudios 6 лет назад +17

      JANGBRiCKS yeah!!!

    • @lewismx8815
      @lewismx8815 6 лет назад +28

      JANGBRiCKS I 100% agree with your rants

    • @BDSMaestro
      @BDSMaestro 6 лет назад +27

      Good. Good. Let the hate flow.

    • @yogbert911
      @yogbert911 6 лет назад +17

      It would be cool if they added extra pieces to make the head and make it an action feature to blow it off. I think that this set is quite a shame. It could have been good.

    • @yogbert911
      @yogbert911 6 лет назад +4

      Also do a destruction video on gnajbricks! Pls

  • @just--facts
    @just--facts 5 лет назад +25

    this set makes me an angry clone

  • @dualmoldedb3088
    @dualmoldedb3088 6 лет назад +12

    I can’t believe this is more expensive than a complete at st

    • @provablegrub4581
      @provablegrub4581 6 лет назад

      The old Brick But did you not release it came with a lift. It's completely worth it ; )

  • @thatoneguy__1966
    @thatoneguy__1966 6 лет назад +30

    This set is like producing a X-wing set but with 2 of the wings torn off and calling it a 'Battle damaged X-wing'.

  • @xcalibur3106
    @xcalibur3106 6 лет назад +21

    Don't worry, the AT-ST head will come out eventually as a $20 DLC 😂😂😂

  • @caydenmongolo7187
    @caydenmongolo7187 6 лет назад +13

    Jang: it would’ve been nice with a face reveal
    Me: they did an eye reveal

    • @Gaybullfrog385
      @Gaybullfrog385 6 лет назад

      Well they did show Gwendolyn's hair (barely)

  • @FrankieFishess
    @FrankieFishess 6 лет назад +3

    At least LEGO did a complete AT-ST set for rouge one not too long ago

  • @playerthree38
    @playerthree38 6 лет назад +41

    Having a complete collapsible cabin would be nice. Friendly reminder that Lego made a ship that was in Force Awakens for about 14 frames before exploding. And that was the play feature.
    Edit: Jakku Quadjumper - 75178

    • @spider-manthecrip783
      @spider-manthecrip783 6 лет назад +1

      Alex Henley at least that was a whole ship

    • @alakazam03
      @alakazam03 6 лет назад +3

      And it’s a really good set

    • @len9117
      @len9117 6 лет назад +3

      that was a good set though

  • @icecoyote764
    @icecoyote764 6 лет назад +25

    A minute of silence for Jang, who sacrificed himself by buying this Set to warn us not to buy it

  • @darthj1174
    @darthj1174 6 лет назад +6

    I get the gnaj reference with rose

  • @kuroyume1818
    @kuroyume1818 6 лет назад +9

    I prefer Gnajbrick's review of this particular set

    • @bluex6348
      @bluex6348 6 лет назад

      Yeah he always tells the truth

  • @ilikemovies22
    @ilikemovies22 6 лет назад +41

    Wait a minute, this is an actual set? I thought it was just a joke!

    • @snakekid4475
      @snakekid4475 6 лет назад

      iLikeMovies when I saw the gnajbricks review I thought it was a moc

  • @pelegocan4929
    @pelegocan4929 6 лет назад +19

    Wait this is a real set... lol I thought Gnajbricks just threw this together with random spare parts xD.

    • @drewc2492
      @drewc2492 4 года назад

      sub boost he did but he was making fun of it.

  • @imjusthavingfun7629
    @imjusthavingfun7629 5 лет назад +3

    They should've included a removable head, I would get it then

  • @Nobody-nw9gy
    @Nobody-nw9gy 6 лет назад +17

    Its made by EA you can get the head dlc by only paying 50$ and they can add better articulation for just 5$

    • @memeboij5656
      @memeboij5656 6 лет назад +1

      We need micro transactions for free dlc

  • @StormX6
    @StormX6 6 лет назад +20

    I don’t think I’ve ever heard Jang this angry about a LEGO set before.

    • @emilianobarrios1388
      @emilianobarrios1388 6 лет назад +1

      Timberwulfx6 neither did I. It really surprises me, even the music is sad.

  • @ethancalvano3371
    @ethancalvano3371 6 лет назад +18

    They should have made the head blowing off an action feature instead

  • @samenneking7930
    @samenneking7930 6 лет назад +14

    I never thought Lego would do something this bad.

  • @cooperm6864
    @cooperm6864 6 лет назад +15

    I love how mad he is and makes a point to be totally unenthusiastic

  • @BufferUnderrun
    @BufferUnderrun 6 лет назад +20

    Man, I love it when Janbricks rips a bad Lego set apart.

  • @testv284
    @testv284 6 лет назад +12

    They should build the real WHOLE walker and add a mechanism to pop off the head,just like the movie.They should also increase the height of that tower thing.

    • @testv284
      @testv284 6 лет назад

      Maybe a smaller at-st with a small head would work with the mechanism.A big head would just be too heavy and hit the childs hand

  • @thanoscar9746
    @thanoscar9746 6 лет назад +21

    next set: blown up death star

  • @amethyst_dawn
    @amethyst_dawn 6 лет назад +6

    Jangbricks, the most strictly family-friendly personality on RUclips, and a thoroughly optimistic fellow.... Just used the "Disappointed Father" tone with Lego.
    Hehe, that was awesome.

  • @ChloeAriT
    @ChloeAriT 6 лет назад +10

    The Rogue One AT-ST is still available! Buy that one.

  • @beholdthejuice
    @beholdthejuice 6 лет назад +6

    Jang: This set is so cool, it deserves it's own special place.
    *Throws it in a trash can*

  • @entity1566
    @entity1566 6 лет назад +13

    An angry emoji in the title of a jangbricks video. Uh oh, he really is angry now...

  • @EdgeofBricks
    @EdgeofBricks 6 лет назад +1

    check my MOC First Order AT-ST, based on 75201 and 75153 :) ruclips.net/video/c_ngxAsAahM/видео.html

  • @georgelinford5576
    @georgelinford5576 5 лет назад +23

    I hate this set *almost* as much as I hate the Last Jedi. *Almost.*

    • @julielee6830
      @julielee6830 4 года назад

      I hate this E-to the power of 657656544754 times more and I don't even have the set
      And because I didn't hate the last jedi

  • @EnginebrandingNl
    @EnginebrandingNl 6 лет назад +14

    Worst. Lego Star Wars set. Ever.
    Best. Jangbricks review. Ever.

  • @Thomas-lq6pf
    @Thomas-lq6pf 6 лет назад +11

    you have to buy the special 20 dollar dlc to get the rest of the head

  • @jcm9097
    @jcm9097 6 лет назад +6

    Why couldn’t Lego just make a complete FO AT-ST and make a cool ‘explosion’ feature that pops off the head and reveals BB-8 controlling it? Then just take away the elevator and it’s as easy as that, you get the figures, and the walker and it’s a good set.

  • @harryw1643
    @harryw1643 6 лет назад +9

    During the film when the top was about to blow off I thought there would be loads of porgs inside.That would have been a lot better

  • @Alex-vu4ze
    @Alex-vu4ze 6 лет назад +8

    "If I sound like I'm being cynical it's because I am"

  • @satellachannel6423
    @satellachannel6423 6 лет назад +10

    Dont worry they will sold the head in limited edition at the Comicon.

  • @burntchicken9704
    @burntchicken9704 6 лет назад +8

    They should’ve made an action feature where you can take the top off of the atst and revel the broken part

    • @callumnemeth2723
      @callumnemeth2723 6 лет назад

      Ultimate review yes! that's what I've been saying!

  • @donnellydominoes1134
    @donnellydominoes1134 6 лет назад +11

    They should have modified this set so that a pop off head would have been an action feature. Then I’d buy it, a little like the Jakku Quadjumper

  • @rf5526
    @rf5526 6 лет назад +9

    The difference with Kylo Ren's Shuttle is that it's still a good and solid set, even if if isnt screen accurate. THIS is literal junk.

  • @brycebitetti1402
    @brycebitetti1402 6 лет назад +6

    It's not everyday you see Jang so mad. When I originally saw the leaked figures I was really excited, and thought that it was going to be a playset with some exploding functions and maybe even an executioner trooper or two. As it is, what a mess.

  • @roycezaro1998
    @roycezaro1998 6 лет назад +14

    I love the sad jazz in the background lol

  • @LostOlympusStudios
    @LostOlympusStudios 6 лет назад +11

    Jang just sounds so heart broken by this set

  • @kail9777
    @kail9777 6 лет назад +9

    Next up, the Millennium Falcon blown up with LEGS ONLY and 4 figures for $39.99.

    • @shockthetoast
      @shockthetoast 6 лет назад

      Leaf42 next up, Cloud City Luke Skywalker with only one hand. (Wait, I would actually buy that....)

    • @JANGBRiCKS
      @JANGBRiCKS  6 лет назад +1

      More like Cloud City Luke Skywalker hand... set. You can build! The 4-piece gas processing vane sensor rod! Movie accurate!

  • @Scorpion-ww1ie
    @Scorpion-ww1ie 6 лет назад +9

    They should at least include the head but can be remove to recreate the scene

  • @Andrew-bb7ci
    @Andrew-bb7ci 6 лет назад +20

    Wow... just wow. That’s absolutely stupid. This was a throw away moment in the movie. But they legit made it into a set over a lot of things

    • @magikal_madz5351
      @magikal_madz5351 6 лет назад

      They seem to be doing a lot of that with the new star wars movies, maybe it is disney's secretive policy thats being detrimental to the merchandise available, for instance, the resistance troop transport, the is only a Lego version and a micro machine of it.

  • @reaven2535
    @reaven2535 6 лет назад +10

    I don't necessarily mind this set. It's an important scene to the movie. I really think they could have fixed everything by giving the ability to turn it into a full AT-ST instead of leaving it off like it is. There even could have been a play feature to rip off the top of it.

  • @andrewmaddox9786
    @andrewmaddox9786 6 лет назад +11

    Couldn’t they at least have given the AT ST a head that could be pulled off as a play feature????

  • @antonborisov6324
    @antonborisov6324 6 лет назад +3

    Jangbricks you seriously made my days after I turned 10 years old and I started to watch your videos. This is what you gave me: insparation, choice between sets. I even started making stop motion. Thank you!!!!

  • @Neil-qg9cw
    @Neil-qg9cw 6 лет назад +9

    Probably the worst set I've ever seen by Lego. I can't believe anyone at Lego thought this was acceptable.

  • @NuuttiRannanpaa
    @NuuttiRannanpaa 6 лет назад +6

    this set leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering.

  • @lord_scrubington
    @lord_scrubington 6 лет назад +17

    they should have made a normal ATST, and just given it an action feature to blow the head of.

  • @kelseybaker682
    @kelseybaker682 6 лет назад +12

    Half an at st is like getting a tiefighter with no wings

  • @omeyara0749
    @omeyara0749 6 лет назад +6

    they should have included the head but with a play feature that you're able to pop off the head.

  • @lorcan0c
    @lorcan0c 6 лет назад +5

    OH MY GOD, Lego are charging €64.99 for this in Ireland, that's nearly 80 dollars!! *FOR SHAME.*

  • @mathewvollmer9730
    @mathewvollmer9730 6 лет назад +8

    Got this set for 50% off on amazon. Mainly bought it for the Phasma minifig, because I’m not paying $100+ for the troop transport.

    • @coraldiamond1922
      @coraldiamond1922 6 лет назад

      mathew vollmer At half of that sounds about right. I don’t blame you for wanting to get it for the figure though as that other set is retired and is expensive anyways.

  • @benjee7164
    @benjee7164 6 лет назад +13

    They should of made the actual AT-ST and then had an action feature to rip the head off

  • @themarcusismael13
    @themarcusismael13 6 лет назад +9

    People, let's not give this set money. It's absurd they'd charge full price for half a walker that only occupies a minute in the movie.

  • @mixnmatchflavourbleach2313
    @mixnmatchflavourbleach2313 6 лет назад +18

    No need to lose your head over it!
    Im kidding this is awful.

  • @angusg832
    @angusg832 6 лет назад +6

    “I think lazy is getting a bit Lego...”

  • @harrybenjamin6666
    @harrybenjamin6666 6 лет назад +8

    Next set: that tie fighter that’s lost it’s wings when it crashed on jakku

  • @sawus9538
    @sawus9538 5 лет назад +13

    They really should’ve just added a head and make it removable

  • @colesephhh9546
    @colesephhh9546 5 лет назад +9

    *Shows This Set*
    Top 10 images that will make a grown man cry

  • @StarScapesOG
    @StarScapesOG 6 лет назад +10

    They should have made the head, but made it so it could have the head ripped off.

  • @spookwavevevo
    @spookwavevevo 6 лет назад +12

    It should have a head and then a function to pop it off.

    • @evergreen7754
      @evergreen7754 6 лет назад

      SpookWave dude exactlyyyy. this was just a lazy attempt to rake in a few bucks (from those who are looking to collect the entire series, that is)

    • @troyp9155
      @troyp9155 6 лет назад

      They would have charged $80 for that

  • @AlecFortescue
    @AlecFortescue 6 лет назад +6

    why not just make a removable cockpit instead of the skeleton elevator? Wish they make an "add-on" in a poly or small box and send it to people upon request and proof that they own the set.

  • @elliste1561
    @elliste1561 6 лет назад +14

    jangry bricks

  • @thepurpleprince9691
    @thepurpleprince9691 6 лет назад +11

    It would have been fine if it came with the head that would was removable so you could recreate the scene in the movie

  • @moonman8450
    @moonman8450 6 лет назад +23

    Couldn’t they just make an AT ST with a removable top?

  • @ArtemisEros
    @ArtemisEros 6 лет назад +7

    What would’ve been better is if they had a destructive feature that blows the head off and then you can seat bb8 inside.

  • @alexandahazy6325
    @alexandahazy6325 6 лет назад +7

    The first time I saw this set was from Gnaj's review, and just assumed that it was an intentionally bad fake set for the sake of the joke

  • @aphra2390
    @aphra2390 6 лет назад +8

    I thought this was fake, but boy was I wrong

    • @JTM610
      @JTM610 6 лет назад

      Trehan solo ikr thought it was a joke

  • @calebbuck6767
    @calebbuck6767 6 лет назад +18

    This would be a good set if it was $25. Though it would probably be used by mostly children who pretend it's one of this smaller AT-ST (I forget the name)

    • @jenkinsey7676
      @jenkinsey7676 6 лет назад

      I'm a fan of clones you are probably thinking of an AT-rt

  • @yoshikagekira1337
    @yoshikagekira1337 6 лет назад +11

    This is an AT-$T.

  • @IARESMART8
    @IARESMART8 6 лет назад +4

    I saw the gnajbricks video and didn't realize he was basing it of a real set

  • @SaturnCanuck
    @SaturnCanuck 6 лет назад +5

    I agree they made a big mistake. The scene in the movie is funny, but does not deserve its own set. What they should have done is made the normal First Order AT-ST with a removable head to do the BB-8 scene if you want -- like how the DeLorean (Lego Ideas) was made to convert to the various configurations.

  • @GlitchyCorpse
    @GlitchyCorpse 6 лет назад +13

    Got to say, I like cynical Jang! Great review as always.

  • @thesheeper0873
    @thesheeper0873 4 года назад +7

    To make set actually good just have a first order atst with a removable head as a feature.

  • @R_eagan
    @R_eagan 6 лет назад +10

    This looks like something Lepin made.

    • @theosh1930
      @theosh1930 6 лет назад +3

      Reagan Reviews 1939 even lepin is better

  • @jesusayala8130
    @jesusayala8130 6 лет назад +7

    LEGO please make a 100% complete first order at st

  • @thecommentboyidonotdovideo1946
    @thecommentboyidonotdovideo1946 6 лет назад +8

    I think it should have the head of the at st and a play feature that when you press a button or flick a switch that the head comes off and there's bb8 sitting there, I also think it should have came with at least 1 execution trooper and the figures that we see now. It will be a bit high on price but put what you think of my idea.

    • @someoneperson3794
      @someoneperson3794 6 лет назад

      Not a button or switch, because the head would fall of A LOT but a lock mechanism seems bettet

  • @Matthewvikki
    @Matthewvikki 6 лет назад +10

    Jang just roasted this set for the majority of the video

  • @valdemarbndinghansen3109
    @valdemarbndinghansen3109 6 лет назад +6

    When i saw your review video of this on gnajbricks i actually thought that you had just taken the head of an at-st and made a quick build on the side

  • @Youngboybetta
    @Youngboybetta 6 лет назад +8

    Only buying for the minifigs. Hopefully Lego will realize their mistake and remake this set with a full head...That and the AT-ST from 2016 had an extra 100 pieces, was complete and was cheaper...

    • @2dick528
      @2dick528 6 лет назад

      Imperialdude94 Gaming did you buy the set? I would feel sorry for you if you did.

  • @hambacon559
    @hambacon559 6 лет назад +6

    Maybe Lego thought this was actually what it was supposed to look like as they didn't have context so they made it thinking it was supposed to be more like the AT RT from the clone wars era

  • @tylerpeterson4684
    @tylerpeterson4684 6 лет назад +5

    I agree that it should come with the full head and just make it easy to remove.

  • @SezMisery
    @SezMisery 6 лет назад +4

    In the set description on the LEGO Shop website it says "Play out a daring LEGO® Star Wars mission to make off with the partially constructed First Order AT-ST walker"
    So not only did they realize that this wasn't a "complete" version of the thing, but they also had the scene wrong. I think if they would have been more well informed we might have seen a version with a removable head.

  • @RyCitrus
    @RyCitrus 6 лет назад +3

    I think the set would've been A LOT better if they included the head or frame that was blown off the at-st in the movie and made that as a feature. I guess it wouldn't be that bad.

  • @iamkvd
    @iamkvd 6 лет назад +5

    I’m trying to think of a worse Lego Star Wars set, and you’re right Mr. Jangbricks, I can’t. This is it.
    I would say I was disappointed at how Kylo Ren’s Command Shuttle ended up, but this is a terrible pile of plastic.
    Thanks for always giving us your honest feedback. Happy Life Day, and may the force be with you.

  • @Katarn84
    @Katarn84 6 лет назад +4

    If they did a detachable head I could have considered this, but this way it will selfwarm as far as I'm concerned.

  • @dragonwookie4492
    @dragonwookie4492 6 лет назад +9

    The last LEGO at st was ALSO $40, but IT HAD A HEAD!! Why LEGO? Why?

    • @jjimmybeastt
      @jjimmybeastt 6 лет назад +2

      DRAGONWOOKIE Shove in two exclusive figures, one hard to get figure in, and a droid available in only expensive sets. Boom. Expensive.

    • @gaymerwerostudios889
      @gaymerwerostudios889 6 лет назад

      Well cause this one has a plat form

  • @loboros3458
    @loboros3458 6 лет назад +8

    Jang sounds pissed
    And I dont blame him

  • @CT--my4lf
    @CT--my4lf 6 лет назад +7

    This: 40$
    Rogue One AT-ST: 40$
    GET THE ONE FROM ROGUE ONE!!!!!!!!
    P.S: Maybe Gnajbricks could do a video taking his apart, and smashing the box? XD

    • @DarthVaderOfficial
      @DarthVaderOfficial 6 лет назад +1

      MYYY ATST!!!! *crushes ATST like that piece of paper*

  • @gwpandia
    @gwpandia 6 лет назад +7

    Lego should rename the title to "Headless First Order ATST" or sth like that, this is not an ATST, this is scam for those not seeing the movie.

  • @evolvedturtleproductions7600
    @evolvedturtleproductions7600 6 лет назад +5

    Why didn’t they just include the head and have you able to pop it off as an action feature?

    • @Sam_50210
      @Sam_50210 6 лет назад

      Evolved Turtle Productions i think then because the head will shatter once it hits ground.

  • @CaptBlock
    @CaptBlock 6 лет назад +10

    Use your hate. Use your anger, Jang, and your journey to the dark side will be complete.

  • @dariusrat6468
    @dariusrat6468 6 лет назад +5

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Just starts showing clouds at the end. BEST REVIEW HE HAS EVER DONE!!

  • @GoforthJonah
    @GoforthJonah 6 лет назад +7

    Lol the depressing music.

  • @Dirge419
    @Dirge419 6 лет назад +6

    The real tell here is that Lego's own online store doesn't advertise or even have this set, makes me wonder who thought that this was OK to release...how it got past product quality checks i will never know.

  • @joeiorio9654
    @joeiorio9654 6 лет назад +5

    What was up with that $50 walker with the 8 legs? That wasn't even in the movie? concept art?

  • @k-874
    @k-874 5 лет назад +8

    "First Order AT-ST LEGO set is great"
    .
    .
    .
    .
    . AND OTHER HILARIOUS JOKES YOU CAN TELL YOURSELF

  • @animationstation5802
    @animationstation5802 6 лет назад +5

    I think it was a risk. What I think might have worked better either have a full at st with a removable head to make it look like this. Or perhaps make it part of some huge set called... idk “escape from the star destroyer”

    • @thinwhitedukestar
      @thinwhitedukestar 6 лет назад

      animation station yeah i think a set this size should have the at-st with a head and a ucs set should have this one

  • @jeef179
    @jeef179 6 лет назад +7

    They should have made a full at st but the top could come off