I am an event photographer and purchased the Sigma 28-45mm F1.8 and absolutely love it. wished it went to 70mm. When I saw the New Sony lens come out I per-ordered it right away. I have been waiting a long time for this lens. Most people do reviews for portraits and presets for portraits, but it seems like there are not a log of event photographers doing reviews. I love your videos, and it does encourage me do do more portraits.
I have the lense since a few days, I would recommend to test it carefully especially wide open as there are issues influencer do or can not see. it is never the less a great lens
This is a great addition. Although I own all but one other GM lens, this one is not for me as it is too redundant. 24-70GM II for mobility and 24/35/50/85 GM's for wide aperture when I need it. But for a select crowd this will be stunning.
Thank you for talking about the quality of the bokeh! Thats the first thing I noticed too, although the backgroud was blurier, but the highlights were harsh and a little to pronounced.
Why I'm Replacing My Sigma 28-45 mmLens with the Sony 28-70mm After some thought, I’ve decided to switch from my Sigma lens to the new Sony 28-70mm. The main factor driving this change? The zoom rotation direction. I’ve gotten used to Sony’s zoom direction, which is shared by Tamron as well. Having consistency in zoom rotation across my lenses is a big deal for me. When using multiple lenses during a shoot, muscle memory plays a critical role, and having one lens rotate in the opposite direction (like Sigma’s) disrupts my flow. I’d rather keep things simple and intuitive across the board. Another major reason for this switch is the 70mm focal length compared to the Sigma’s 45mm. That extra reach at the telephoto end makes the Sony far more versatile for my needs. Whether it’s for portraits, tighter compositions, or general shooting flexibility, the 70mm is a significant advantage. While I haven’t used the Sony lens yet, I’m confident its autofocus will be more reliable, accurate, and consistent compared to the Sigma. Sony has an excellent reputation for AF performance, and their native lenses tend to integrate perfectly with Sony bodies. This will be another big plus for my workflow. Finally, while the weight difference is minor-only about 30 grams-the Sony is still lighter, which is always a small bonus for extended use. For me, the combination of consistent zoom rotation, the superior focal range, better autofocus, and a slightly lighter build makes the Sony 28-70mm a clear winner. I’m looking forward to incorporating it into my kit and seeing how it performs!
I have the 28-70 F2 for Canon…it’s heavy but the image quality trumps the inconveniences. I also shoot Sony as well and have the Sigma 24-70 I. I feel like with this release, Sony was late to the party. I shoot weddings and bought this lens for that prime look reason. I no longer need to spend 3K again. I wonder how sells will do?
I agree I have the canon for weddings and I’m use to it now and to be honest it’s a magic lens as I came from primes and it’s only a pound heavier than the Sony. Love my canon version it does everything for me no regrets
Very nice! Can't wait for Sigma / Tamron / Samyang to make a 28-70 f/2.0 for $1,500-2,000. Even better if they make a 24-70 f/2.0 (or even 24-55 f/2.0) for $2,500-3,000.
I'm glad the Sigma 28-45mm is fitting most of my use cases. I have a small apsc body with the Sigma 56mm f1.4 that covers the longer range. You can get an apsc body with the Sigma 56mm for less than the difference in price to the Sony 28-70 f2. For professionals a nice 85mm prime lens or a 70-200ish zoom lens with a full frame body seems like a good end game.
Ya but you could sell almost all of your lens and just use this. Instead of carrying like four or five primes. You could have this lens. Just carry a GM 24mm 1.4 and this lens. All you need!
@quetzocoal That surely is one approach. I often prefer a nice 85 mm prime, though. For me, it will be the Samyang 24mm f2.8. It's tiny, cheap and sharp.
@quetzocoal That would provide you with an f2.4 ff equivalent of depth of field. Admittedly, I recently shot on a wedding quite successfully with the Sigma 56mm f1.4, mostly at f1.6, which is comparable (f2.4 ff equivalent). So you have a point here indeed for the 28-70mm. For a non-professional photographer having a lightweight apsc body and lens in addition has it's perks though. However, I brought a 135mm f1.8 (on a speed booster) as a companion to that wedding as well and got wonderful shots with it. My idea is to replace that with the Viltrox 85mm f1.2, since for me, that's usually too long. As mentioned, many will argue for the 70-200 instead, both would make the 70mm end of the 28-70 somewhat useless.
The GM 24-70 2.8 II is definitely the best in this range that I have used across all platforms (canon, Nikon, Sigma). It’s the reason I still am with Sony FE mount. I augment it with a 35mm 1.4 GM for low light and an 85mm 1.4 DG DN Sigma. But it’s nice that Sony has done this, but it’s not for me.
Sony 16-25 F2.8, Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8, Sigma 24mm F1.4, Sony 50mm F1.2 would be my kit if I was starting all over. Instead I have 1 zoom and 5 Primes. LOL!
Me in 2019 when I was doing events and anime cons would love this lenses. As I had the A7riii with the 24-70mm F2.8 GM mki Now that I do travel I already own the 24-70mm F2.8 GM mkii and can't see myself going towards this lense. Even the 20-70mm F4 looks better to me just for the range and size.
I wish Nikon would create lenses like this for the Z system, though I do enjoy using the Tamron 35-150 f2-2.8, but i wish it was a dedicated F2. Sometimes I'm envious of the lens selections both Canon and Sony have.
I wish Nikon made a version. I just ordered (to Rent) this lens and the EtZ21 pro adapter to test on my z8/z9. If it can keep up with sports I will add it to my collection.
If it was 24-70 it was great. Even if it was bigger and heavier. I was shooting with d850 back then, and every thing was bigger. We did fine. The idea in getting smaller is to get the ability to make this kind of lenses without getting smaller or bigger from back then.
@alphaandomega2709 I shot 2 paid sessions this morning with the 24-70 GM2. I shoot at f4 a lot of the time, because I've got eyes on multiple focal planes.
My initial thought would be if I buy this lens, can I sell my 24-70 f2.8 lens? If the answer is yes. Then I think I might be able to afford it. If somehow I need to use 24-70 in certain situation, and I can not fully replace it with this lens. Then I can not afford both.
This lens is profusely expensive in Norway; it cost $4,061. I really wanted it, but I have these three beauties: Sony 70-200 f/2.8 GM II, Sony 50 f/1.2, and the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 DG DN II. Can anyone recommend a fourth lens that is unique and doesn’t overlap? 😇
@@hellolau Nah. The Sigma 24-70 mk2 is the way to go. I like GM lenses and have multiple, but the 24-70 GM ii is probably the worst buy since the Sigma one is so good and half the price. If you must go Sony then skip the 24-70 GM ii and get the 28-70 GM.
If it was 24-70 I would consider it. I already have 24-70mm f/2.8 GM (II) They question is, does the lens picture stills/video make a big enough difference? From what you shared and reviewing and listening to others it appears if you pixel peep, yeah it does. I do not really pixel peep and highly suspect most people looking at an image coming out of 24-70 f/2.8 GM (II) and 28-70 f/2.0 GM won't be able to tell the difference and more importantly will not care,. So now what? Do I want a heavy lens like that? I already have the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM (II) which as you know Manny that lens is all the RAVE and weigh approximately 1,045 grams (2.3 pounds), including the tripod collar. Without the tripod collar, the lens weighs around 985 grams (2.2 pounds). The 28-70 f/2.0 GM weighs approximately 918 grams (32.4 ounces). ...sure absolutely high performance with portability and still that size and weight and price. Probably a soft pass. Do I want it, probably, I won't get sucked in though lol (I better not get sucked in - I won't do it - O'kay I will try not to). ...as you said, "make your wallet lighter." If I was pro shooter making my living with gear I would then consider since I know I could make back the funds in now time. I ask myself though even being a pro and able to make the fund back does a pro truly even need this lens? ...that is more a question for you Manny. Have you ever used dirty lenses for example something like the Helios 44-M? If you have seen, "The Batman" from 2022 Matt Reeves he used dirty lenses and anamorphic lenses giving it that look. Personally I thought, now that is how Batman should look, dark, dirty, grimy. Take nothing away from Christopher Nolan, "The Dark Knight" his movie and look he gave Batman. His look was mostly clean almost clinical for my taste. The dirty lens add a unique character. Would be interesting and probably super cool if you tried some dirty lenses as well (if you have not already). You talent you shoot is always interesting with character. With dirty lens imagine what type of added distinctive, unusual interesting character and professional like you would bring to the table. I am quite certain you would also capture more viewers and subscribers as well. New is good, new is great, new is better and old and older are timeless and vintage. Darn I just kind of went down that rabbit hole. Sorry man! Thanks for your video yet again Holmes.
Thanks allot for your honest and straightforward thoughts on this new lens. I’m personally more intrigued with the lens, as apposed to A1II, as it is only marginally better than my current A1’s. Will you be picking up a copy of either A1II/28-70mm f2 GM, or you perfectly content with your current setup?
Dear Nikon what are u even doing with non S line 1.4 primes no one asked for . look at other brands. Being a nikon shooter i wish nikon makes 1.4S line hybrid lenses leveraging their huge mount for lightweightness
I'm really disappointed by this video. It just seems lazy. You need to discuss the advantage of having f/2 over 2.8 and what a big difference that makes for photo and video. I hope you make another video about this lens that is more in-depth.
@@chuckm482 I've made a lot of money at a Fuji cameras cause I really love the colour science that I simply could not get with another camera so I'm staying. I don't care about the auto focus. I get it to work pretty well.
What a waste of a lens! Seriously Sony? Almost $3000....???? Really Bro? Really? Sony be acting like there ain't no other alternatives out there at a fraction of the cost.....but all the dumb dumbs Sony Fanboys will hop up on it because of the Sony Brand name. There's nothing revolutionary about this lens at all!!! ....nothing
It feels like camera companies are no longer innovating for the sake of advancing technology but instead for maximizing profits. Case in point: the release of a 28-70mm f2 lens shortly after the 24-70mm f2.8. Let’s be real-does this marginal difference truly elevate anyone’s work, or is it just a way to squeeze more money out of consumers? GAS
Well the 24-70 mm 2.8 version 2 actually came out in 2022. Some Sony users have complained about not having unique lenses like Canon. So they listened and made one of Canon's most popular lenses. Would it make that much of a difference for work? I'm sure professional photographers would rather have a F2 rather than a F2.8. This is aimed at a small subset of photographers but I'm sure it will sell well. Lastly....there is only so much you can do with Tech. They know have global shutters, preshooting, 120 FPS in jpeg, 40 FPS RAW with AI autofocus and tracking? What's next? 100 megapixels? Sure that's coming. Hey, the good thing is A1's , A7R5's will be sold to purchase these so maybe I could pick up a used A73 lol! .cheers
@ @ There’s absolutely nothing unique about this focal length compared to the already popular 24-70mm. What’s worse is that when brands like Tamron offer a 28-75mm f2.8 for a fraction of the cost, it’s hard to justify the premium. All you’re really getting here is 1 stop of extra light-a marginal benefit that most photographers & videographers can work around with low-light sensors. The difference just doesn’t add up. Are we paying for actual innovation or just falling into a marketing trap?
@@gregorybeale Also we still don't have 85/1.2, macro GM, 24-105/4 M2, RX10 M5... So at least a 100mpx sensor for A7RM6 with a properly working AI-tracking would be great.
@@Ryanwminor be glad u have 24 70 2.8 GMii. this f2 option is for those niche ppl who want. No one is a kid to fall for sony marketing nor sony is forcing us to buy this without giving lessexpensive options
I have the 28-70 sigma as well as the 24-70 GMii. Honestly for the light weightness of the sigma I usually just throw it on with a polarpro PMvnd and I'm good. Never feel like oh $hit I should've used my 24-70GMii 🤷🏾
I am an event photographer and purchased the Sigma 28-45mm F1.8 and absolutely love it. wished it went to 70mm. When I saw the New Sony lens come out I per-ordered it right away. I have been waiting a long time for this lens. Most people do reviews for portraits and presets for portraits, but it seems like there are not a log of event photographers doing reviews. I love your videos, and it does encourage me do do more portraits.
I have the lense since a few days, I would recommend to test it carefully especially wide open as there are issues influencer do or can not see. it is never the less a great lens
This is the lens I’ve been waiting for Sony to develop and produce. What an absolute beast of a lens. Pre-order placed! Look at the size and weight!
When does it come out??
I haven't watched a camera video in a while. Have to catch up with people like you. Good to see you brotha.
This is a great addition. Although I own all but one other GM lens, this one is not for me as it is too redundant. 24-70GM II for mobility and 24/35/50/85 GM's for wide aperture when I need it. But for a select crowd this will be stunning.
Thank you for talking about the quality of the bokeh! Thats the first thing I noticed too, although the backgroud was blurier, but the highlights were harsh and a little to pronounced.
Why I'm Replacing My Sigma 28-45 mmLens with the Sony 28-70mm
After some thought, I’ve decided to switch from my Sigma lens to the new Sony 28-70mm. The main factor driving this change? The zoom rotation direction.
I’ve gotten used to Sony’s zoom direction, which is shared by Tamron as well. Having consistency in zoom rotation across my lenses is a big deal for me. When using multiple lenses during a shoot, muscle memory plays a critical role, and having one lens rotate in the opposite direction (like Sigma’s) disrupts my flow. I’d rather keep things simple and intuitive across the board.
Another major reason for this switch is the 70mm focal length compared to the Sigma’s 45mm. That extra reach at the telephoto end makes the Sony far more versatile for my needs. Whether it’s for portraits, tighter compositions, or general shooting flexibility, the 70mm is a significant advantage.
While I haven’t used the Sony lens yet, I’m confident its autofocus will be more reliable, accurate, and consistent compared to the Sigma. Sony has an excellent reputation for AF performance, and their native lenses tend to integrate perfectly with Sony bodies. This will be another big plus for my workflow.
Finally, while the weight difference is minor-only about 30 grams-the Sony is still lighter, which is always a small bonus for extended use.
For me, the combination of consistent zoom rotation, the superior focal range, better autofocus, and a slightly lighter build makes the Sony 28-70mm a clear winner. I’m looking forward to incorporating it into my kit and seeing how it performs!
Looks like a neat lens I’m sure Sony users will enjoy! The Canon on is a monster in size and weight
Coming out some 6 years later than the Canon version l would expect it to be smaller and lighter but had they gone 24/70mm that would impress.
I have the 28-70 F2 for Canon…it’s heavy but the image quality trumps the inconveniences. I also shoot Sony as well and have the Sigma 24-70 I. I feel like with this release, Sony was late to the party. I shoot weddings and bought this lens for that prime look reason. I no longer need to spend 3K again. I wonder how sells will do?
I agree I have the canon for weddings and I’m use to it now and to be honest it’s a magic lens as I came from primes and it’s only a pound heavier than the Sony. Love my canon version it does everything for me no regrets
@ Bingo!
I’m glad you pointed out the bokeh!
Onion rings at $3K unbelievable, no go.
🤦♀️🤦🏻 That 1% difference in 350% Pixelated. 🚮🗑️
Very nice! Can't wait for Sigma / Tamron / Samyang to make a 28-70 f/2.0 for $1,500-2,000.
Even better if they make a 24-70 f/2.0 (or even 24-55 f/2.0) for $2,500-3,000.
I'm glad the Sigma 28-45mm is fitting most of my use cases. I have a small apsc body with the Sigma 56mm f1.4 that covers the longer range. You can get an apsc body with the Sigma 56mm for less than the difference in price to the Sony 28-70 f2.
For professionals a nice 85mm prime lens or a 70-200ish zoom lens with a full frame body seems like a good end game.
Ya but you could sell almost all of your lens and just use this. Instead of carrying like four or five primes. You could have this lens. Just carry a GM 24mm 1.4 and this lens. All you need!
@quetzocoal That surely is one approach. I often prefer a nice 85 mm prime, though.
For me, it will be the Samyang 24mm f2.8. It's tiny, cheap and sharp.
@@maggnet4829 you could do the crop and or digital zoom to get that 85mm
@quetzocoal That would provide you with an f2.4 ff equivalent of depth of field. Admittedly, I recently shot on a wedding quite successfully with the Sigma 56mm f1.4, mostly at f1.6, which is comparable (f2.4 ff equivalent). So you have a point here indeed for the 28-70mm. For a non-professional photographer having a lightweight apsc body and lens in addition has it's perks though.
However, I brought a 135mm f1.8 (on a speed booster) as a companion to that wedding as well and got wonderful shots with it. My idea is to replace that with the Viltrox 85mm f1.2, since for me, that's usually too long. As mentioned, many will argue for the 70-200 instead, both would make the 70mm end of the 28-70 somewhat useless.
@ no argument from me as I am not a professional. I am an amateur that mostly shoots urban photography.
The GM 24-70 2.8 II is definitely the best in this range that I have used across all platforms (canon, Nikon, Sigma). It’s the reason I still am with Sony FE mount. I augment it with a 35mm 1.4 GM for low light and an 85mm 1.4 DG DN Sigma.
But it’s nice that Sony has done this, but it’s not for me.
Good lookin out for the real feedback 😎
Sony 16-25 F2.8, Tamron 35-150mm F2-2.8, Sigma 24mm F1.4, Sony 50mm F1.2 would be my kit if I was starting all over. Instead I have 1 zoom and 5 Primes. LOL!
Hey Manny, can you please review the 28 to 70mm Stm lens from Canon. I need you to please review it before I make a purchase
Me in 2019 when I was doing events and anime cons would love this lenses. As I had the A7riii with the 24-70mm F2.8 GM mki
Now that I do travel I already own the 24-70mm F2.8 GM mkii and can't see myself going towards this lense. Even the 20-70mm F4 looks better to me just for the range and size.
How would you compare this to the Tamron 35-150 or the sigma 28-45mm?
I wish Nikon would create lenses like this for the Z system, though I do enjoy using the Tamron 35-150 f2-2.8, but i wish it was a dedicated F2. Sometimes I'm envious of the lens selections both Canon and Sony have.
I wish Nikon made a version. I just ordered (to Rent) this lens and the EtZ21 pro adapter to test on my z8/z9. If it can keep up with sports I will add it to my collection.
If it was 24-70 it was great. Even if it was bigger and heavier. I was shooting with d850 back then, and every thing was bigger. We did fine. The idea in getting smaller is to get the ability to make this kind of lenses without getting smaller or bigger from back then.
aperture blades aren't part of it when wide open.
Can you use 82mm filters with a 86mm step down ring with no vignetting?
I need the 24mm wide end of the 24-70 GM2.
Be glad u have a lighter less expensive 24 70 2.8 GMii . sony is giving this another option for niche ppl.
@alphaandomega2709 I shot 2 paid sessions this morning with the 24-70 GM2. I shoot at f4 a lot of the time, because I've got eyes on multiple focal planes.
@@saibhargavamanda1062 Here in Mexico, the 2470gm2 is on sale at the equivalent of $2200 US. That's $600 less than I paid for it.
Never liked the image quality of the GM2. Looks foily to me. Keen for this f2
Appreciate you man! You think Sigma will come out with a cheaper alternative in the new year?
My initial thought would be if I buy this lens, can I sell my 24-70 f2.8 lens? If the answer is yes. Then I think I might be able to afford it. If somehow I need to use 24-70 in certain situation, and I can not fully replace it with this lens. Then I can not afford both.
Does your lens like his add flies to photos of kids in Africa - Kenya specifically or it does when you put your camera into poverty p*rn mode?
Now Nikon need one, those lenses are perfect for my needs , come on Nikon!!
This lens is profusely expensive in Norway; it cost $4,061. I really wanted it, but I have these three beauties: Sony 70-200 f/2.8 GM II, Sony 50 f/1.2, and the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 DG DN II. Can anyone recommend a fourth lens that is unique and doesn’t overlap? 😇
Sony 12-24 GM. Or the Sigma 14-24 Art. Ultra wide is all you're missing to complete the trifecta.
Get rid of the sigma 🤢 buy the Sony instead q
@@hellolau Nah. The Sigma 24-70 mk2 is the way to go. I like GM lenses and have multiple, but the 24-70 GM ii is probably the worst buy since the Sigma one is so good and half the price.
If you must go Sony then skip the 24-70 GM ii and get the 28-70 GM.
For the size, o wonder if they could have made a 24-70 f2.0 at the same size and similar weight of the Canon lens
What do you think would be better for videography/vlogging? The Sony 24-70 II or the Sony 28-70 f2 ?
24-70 is lighter so it is better.. No one uses F2 for close up vloggin video with full frame so F2.8 is enough good for most situations.
@ thank you
@@FilmedbyZach although the focus speed of this one is supposed to be magnificent without breathing
I would have loved it to be 28-85mm f2 or 35-85mm f2. Maybe we’ll see a 24-105mm f2 in the future :)
Every beautiful reality is first a dream…
I think you'll be dreaming for a while :)
@ Yes, you are right, but one day they will have to do it.
Great attempt.
We need to do a drop test on these two lenses and see the one that stops working first.
Next, Nikon needs to respond a.s.a.p.
20-55mm f 2.0 is the best. 55mm in crop mode = 82mm
If it was 24-70 I would consider it. I already have 24-70mm f/2.8 GM (II)
They question is, does the lens picture stills/video make a big enough difference?
From what you shared and reviewing and listening to others it appears if you pixel peep, yeah it does. I do not really pixel peep and highly suspect most people looking at an image coming out of 24-70 f/2.8 GM (II) and 28-70 f/2.0 GM won't be able to tell the difference and more importantly will not care,.
So now what? Do I want a heavy lens like that? I already have the 70-200mm f/2.8 GM (II) which as you know Manny that lens is all the RAVE and weigh approximately 1,045 grams (2.3 pounds), including the tripod collar. Without the tripod collar, the lens weighs around 985 grams (2.2 pounds).
The 28-70 f/2.0 GM weighs approximately 918 grams (32.4 ounces). ...sure absolutely high performance with portability and still that size and weight and price.
Probably a soft pass. Do I want it, probably, I won't get sucked in though lol (I better not get sucked in - I won't do it - O'kay I will try not to). ...as you said, "make your wallet lighter." If I was pro shooter making my living with gear I would then consider since I know I could make back the funds in now time. I ask myself though even being a pro and able to make the fund back does a pro truly even need this lens? ...that is more a question for you Manny.
Have you ever used dirty lenses for example something like the Helios 44-M? If you have seen, "The Batman" from 2022 Matt Reeves he used dirty lenses and anamorphic lenses giving it that look. Personally I thought, now that is how Batman should look, dark, dirty, grimy. Take nothing away from Christopher Nolan, "The Dark Knight" his movie and look he gave Batman. His look was mostly clean almost clinical for my taste. The dirty lens add a unique character.
Would be interesting and probably super cool if you tried some dirty lenses as well (if you have not already). You talent you shoot is always interesting with character. With dirty lens imagine what type of added distinctive, unusual interesting character and professional like you would bring to the table. I am quite certain you would also capture more viewers and subscribers as well. New is good, new is great, new is better and old and older are timeless and vintage.
Darn I just kind of went down that rabbit hole. Sorry man!
Thanks for your video yet again Holmes.
it renders like a sigma, the defined bokeh balls on specular highlights. personally, i like it.
Nahh I’m good.
Where is the fly?
So which Sony wide prime would you use to balance out this lens, or which wide zoom would you get to build the ultimate 2 lens setup?
I have the 16-35 and the 70-200, so this would fit nicely in between.
either 135mm f1.8 or 70-200mm f2.8 AND then a prime for aggressive shallow depth of field (or low light) portraits. Maybe 50mm f1.2?
Either the Sony 20 f1.8 G or the Sony 16-25 2.8 G
Anybody know how this would work on a Nikon z8 w an adapter?
Thanks allot for your honest and straightforward thoughts on this new lens. I’m personally more intrigued with the lens, as apposed to A1II, as it is only marginally better than my current A1’s. Will you be picking up a copy of either A1II/28-70mm f2 GM, or you perfectly content with your current setup?
Price!!!! What price they asking for it?????
$2900 I believe
@ DAAAAAAAAAAMN
Canon... 🔥🔥🔥
I’m inpressed by the minimum focusing distance. Was it 38 cm compared to Canon’s 1 meter? 😂
I really would rather 24mm over f2.
Tamron 35-150mm for me.
Thank you
The 24-105 or 24-70 isn't wide enough. For me it's either the 20-70 or the 28-70.
Is there a typo here?
@B-Moye 20-70mm f/4 or 28-70mm f/2
Dear Nikon what are u even doing with non S line 1.4 primes no one asked for . look at other brands.
Being a nikon shooter i wish nikon makes 1.4S line hybrid lenses leveraging their huge mount for lightweightness
Those 1.4 primes are trash.
Manny!!!
To much money when there is some many competitors out there coming in cheaper and very compareable .
Does Sigma or Tamron have a f2 zoom lens up to 70mm? 2.8 not it for me.
Sigma 28-70 2.8. I’m good.
Too heavy for me. 24 70mm f2.8 is a more portable lens. If i need a wider aperture, I'll get f1.4
No thank you Sony. 28mm simply isn't wide enough for video. Now a f2 or even f2.8 20-70mm would be a different story!
what TF is up with these redundant lenses? ill take the original GM at a discount tho
nikon, where is your 28-70 F2, hmm???
For $2800 USD it should have been a 24-70 F2
I do prefer bokeh in 24-70 F2.8 more than 28-70 F2
I'm really disappointed by this video. It just seems lazy. You need to discuss the advantage of having f/2 over 2.8 and what a big difference that makes for photo and video. I hope you make another video about this lens that is more in-depth.
🎉🎉
Must be nice to afford that..
$2,898.00 😆😆😆
Who on gods earth who looks at the shape of bokeh balls
Sorry I Like my Fujifilm GFX 55 1.7...and 80 1.7
I just left Fuji. NO regrets!!!
@@chuckm482 I've made a lot of money at a Fuji cameras cause I really love the colour science that I simply could not get with another camera so I'm staying. I don't care about the auto focus. I get it to work pretty well.
What a waste of a lens! Seriously Sony? Almost $3000....???? Really Bro? Really?
Sony be acting like there ain't no other alternatives out there at a fraction of the cost.....but all the dumb dumbs Sony Fanboys will hop up on it because of the Sony Brand name.
There's nothing revolutionary about this lens at all!!! ....nothing
It feels like camera companies are no longer innovating for the sake of advancing technology but instead for maximizing profits. Case in point: the release of a 28-70mm f2 lens shortly after the 24-70mm f2.8. Let’s be real-does this marginal difference truly elevate anyone’s work, or is it just a way to squeeze more money out of consumers? GAS
Well the 24-70 mm 2.8 version 2 actually came out in 2022. Some Sony users have complained about not having unique lenses like Canon. So they listened and made one of Canon's most popular lenses. Would it make that much of a difference for work? I'm sure professional photographers would rather have a F2 rather than a F2.8. This is aimed at a small subset of photographers but I'm sure it will sell well. Lastly....there is only so much you can do with Tech. They know have global shutters, preshooting, 120 FPS in jpeg, 40 FPS RAW with AI autofocus and tracking? What's next? 100 megapixels? Sure that's coming. Hey, the good thing is A1's , A7R5's will be sold to purchase these so maybe I could pick up a used A73 lol!
.cheers
@ @ There’s absolutely nothing unique about this focal length compared to the already popular 24-70mm. What’s worse is that when brands like Tamron offer a 28-75mm f2.8 for a fraction of the cost, it’s hard to justify the premium.
All you’re really getting here is 1 stop of extra light-a marginal benefit that most photographers & videographers can work around with low-light sensors. The difference just doesn’t add up.
Are we paying for actual innovation or just falling into a marketing trap?
@@gregorybeale Also we still don't have 85/1.2, macro GM, 24-105/4 M2, RX10 M5... So at least a 100mpx sensor for A7RM6 with a properly working AI-tracking would be great.
I strongly prefer the 28-70 f2 more than the 24-70 from canon. I don't understand the problem with having options.
@@Ryanwminor be glad u have 24 70 2.8 GMii. this f2 option is for those niche ppl who want. No one is a kid to fall for sony marketing nor sony is forcing us to buy this without giving lessexpensive options
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
… nice try with a joke at beginning. 🤷♂️
I still love my canon version and I woudnt change it for the world. It took Sony 6 years 🤣
Sony copying Canon again. What’s the point of always playing it safe? Should have made it 24-50mm or 20-50mm instead
It's too heavy... And too pricey... Gonna keep my sigma 28-70 f2.8...
I want f2 so badly just for the DOF, but if Sigma doesn't come out with one, I'll get the f2.8 as well...
I have the 28-70 sigma as well as the 24-70 GMii. Honestly for the light weightness of the sigma I usually just throw it on with a polarpro PMvnd and I'm good. Never feel like oh $hit I should've used my 24-70GMii 🤷🏾
Brother you got some brain fog. You can barely finish your sentences.
Guarantee Jared Polin gonna be sarcastic and act like this lens is a dud lol... dude's a Canon fanboy.
24-70 has a pretty useless range, imagine a 28-70 that even cost that much. I prefer a 24-105 and a couple of primes.