I watched it live... I remember when Mary Carillo said that there was no way Connors could come back in the 3rd set... it was awesome to see him turn it around right after.
i remember this was the summer going into my first year of high school, me and my buddies had spent our first summer playing tennis..then tuned into this entire Open..this match ill never forget!
First time my eyes teared up watching tennis match. What a man and a fighter. You make me proud born in 1952, the year of dragon. You are fire breathing dragon my man ~~.
Connors was my inspiration as a kid. First racquet was a T-2000 in the late 70's. Made jr and high school tennis teams with it before switching to a red Head before college. Connor's tenacity was always electrifying while I was playing. Watching some of his late career matches In hindsight....we all knew this guy wasn't going to win majors after 1991. A good show at the time, yes.
1:54:00 Connors losing 4-6/ 6-7/ 0-3/ 0-40 "Patrick McEnroe cruising here in the third." 1:57:00 "Connors is very much down and out in this match. It's nearly impossible for him to come back". 3:39:00 Match Point.
Jimmy Connors....the man who invented the FIST PUMP !!! Every time you see a golfer, a baseball player, a basketball player, football player, tennis player, coaches on sidelines, etc.....all celebrating a great moment with the FIST PUMP....that body language began with a man named Jimmy Connors. He's the most exciting player to ever pick up a tennis racket, and he's DIRECTLY responsible for bring in the big money grand prizes into his sport if you were good enough to win a tournament. Every player should be obligated to donate one half of a percent of their yearly prize money into Jimmy Connor's bank account for that...he REFUSED to play for peanuts and he changed the entire culture of tennis.
Connors was built like a little girl. He and mccenroe never won a slam after 84, even though they were still in their primes. The bigger. Stronger, faster athletes came into the game and blew these little girls off the court.
adoravo connors ,mi piaceva da morire il suo ateggiamento ,come portava i colpi sia il diritto come il suo magnifico rovescio portati con un eleganza che non o mai visto fare a nessuno ,dopo che a lasciato il tennis non cera nessuno che mi piaceva come lui e o lasciato di guardare il tennis ...fino al 2008 quando o visto la partita piu incredibile che o visto...la finale di wimbledon .. ..tra federer e nadal .e stata una rivelazione
I remember watching this match live on usa network as it went way past my bedtime as I had to be to work early, but it didnt matter , I wasnt going asleep on the east coast until the conclusion. one of the top 10 all time greatest US Open matches
Greatest comeback in tennis history: 2 sets to 0, 3 games to 0 and 40-0. 1:56:57 Mary Carillo: "You can see that Connors is very much down and out in this match; it's nearly impossible for him to come back." 3:39:30 Then afterwards Carillo says well he obviously isn't going to get any further; he got to the semis at age 39--oldest player of the modern era to do so.
In his prime, in 1 single match, I pick Connors over anybody. Sure, he’s tanked sets and could be beaten in big matches. But he never choked under pressure. That’s why I would take him against anyone in his prime. He could force his opponents to choke.
@@dmmusicmusic That's incorrect. Connors played Sampras the next year (1992) and although he lost in straight sets (best of 3), he broke pistol Pete's serve 3 times. When you get to 39-40 years old, everything you do slows down on the court, and you lose a bit of a step. You also lose explosive power. Connors at his peak would have beaten Sampras. Keep in mind that Sampras had a lot of trouble against Boris Becker, and actually said Becker was the best indoor player in the world. And although Connors never beat Becker, he came damn close at Queens. And Connors was even head to head with Edberg, who often beat Becker. Often it's a matter of style.
@@lawrence1318 Connors had big losing h2h against Borg, McEnroe and Lendl, and you're telling me in his prime he would beat Sampras? His old school style wouldn't match up against Pete's power tennis. Yes, he broke Pete's serve three times in '92 because he is great fighter and can be intimidating (Pete was still below prime, remember), but all his opponent had to do was play his tennis to win easily. Next you will say Connors in his prime could beat Federer. Roger at 40 would beat Jimmy in his prime. Edit: Would like to add that all matches except last one between Connors and Becker were when the latter was just a kid. Sure, he won big events as a teenager, but I could see him getting intimidated by someone of Jimmy's character. Becker still won those matches. Both in their prime, Jimmy gets blasted.
@@philjohnson9320 You suffer from wet-behind-the-ears disease. Connors overtook Borg in 82. Watch their exhibition match from that year. Connors was at least 5 years older than his rivals (often much more). If you compare Connors vs McEnroe ranking v age, there is no comparison: McEnroe gets left for dead. Running around a tennis court for an additional 5 years takes its toll. Sampras had already won the U.S open when Connors played him, and Connors was 40. So breaking Pistol Pete's serve 3 times in a 2 set match, was incredible. If you watch the match, Connors was simply tired at certain stages. Connors actually played Sampras twice: the first time he took the first set to a tie-break. Connors beat Agassi 3 times in a row in the same exhibition tournament in 1989, after he had already lost twice to Agassi in the 88 and 89 U.S Open. So once Connors got a read on his opponent, he started to dominate him. In fact in the exhibition tournament, Connors was injured and hobbling on one leg, and still beat Agassi. You can find that match in the net and watch Connors completely dominate Agassi. You can't compare the prime of one era with another, as there is an evolution of speed which the players progressively adopt and which becomes the new context. (This is similar to comparing an old movie to a new one: the old is dated in mannerisms and speech and yet the actors at the time were modern for the time.) All you can do is look at the players with regard to their rivals, and also with regard to how they matched up against newer players. Connors is king in this regard. Connors still holds certain records, the chief of these being most professional wins of any male player in history (109). Federer is at 103 currently and is known to be trying to catch Jimmy's record. On the eve of Wimbledon 2013, the chairman of the Royal Tennis Assoc of England publicly announced that Connors was the greatest player of all time. His source was most likely the 2 university studies which had analysed all matches played in all majors since 1969. You can find those studies from North Western University and a university in England whose name escapes me at present. The conclusion was from the universities' statistics departments and used a lot of high-falutin' maths. They were unbiased statistics projects.
Frustrating the TV coverage cuts out the best part of the match. Connors was down 0-40 in the 4th game of the 3rd set and down 0-3 in the set. The coverage cuts away and comes back at 1-3 where suddenly Connors has all the momentum.
To "good" old days where networks had complete control over what one could and could not watch, forcing you to watch commercials during live matches. Don't miss that at all.
connors fought so hard in the 2nd set and still lost it, most players probably would have given up then espcially at 39.that bad no call got connors pissed and gave him the energy he needed to win the 4th set and the 5th
I would love to know what brother John said to brother Patrick after the match. "Damnit man, you let the jerk off the hook." or would it be "Don't feel bad, that's what Connors does."
Someone, someday, should tell those commentators that (surprise, surprise) they are not the stars, that they should not reluctantly stop talking after the points started and generally behave like the players are just an unavoidable nuisance to their commetary.
39 yo Connors playing 25 yo Mac .I think those ages correct.i loved Patrick Mac style of play.he is very good .I wish he advanced and wished I saw him play more.i liked this match .I was at open I think this year..can't remember ..no I wasn't I just remembered where I was .I started new career ..I love us open season..soon!!
In 1982, I left the Jet opener when they were losing to Miami 45-14, walked over to Flushing Meadow, and caught the last three sets of the Connors-Lendl US Open final (won by Connors), sitting 20 rows above the net. A friend tipped me off that the tickettakers used to watch the match after letting everyone in so no one was at the gates after the first set of the main match started. Wonder if that had changed by 1991 it certainly isn't the case now.
It Must have been amazing. I watched the match in Australia I really admired Connors fighting spirit, would have been great to see him play live Best regards
WAS THERE LIKE A HUMONGOUS GENERATOR AT THE SIDE OF THE COURT ? WHAT IS THE MOTOR NOISE ALWAY THROUGH THE MATCH IT WAS DRIVING ME NUTS .. Other than that great upload love seeing matches like this as they were not broadcast in the UK when i was a kid in the UK they only care about Wimbledon.
Bon parcours des deux anciens et légendes Connors et Lendl ,hélas arrêtés chacun en demi-finale en trois sets par des joueurs plus jeune et plus frais ,Edberg vainqueur de Wimbledon 90 et courrier le vainqueur de Roland Garros 91
Connors played great, but he wouldn't have won this match under today's rules. In the last set he was sometimes taking more than a minute to serve, killing time until he could catch his breath.
Right on..Connors, as we all know, when first played Johnny Mac, at Wimbledon, in the semis ( forgot the date ) Connors pulled out the win in four tough sets, realized that Mac was real..
oui Caujolle ...et s'il n'y avait pas eu une balle let contre Roger Vasselin...on aurait pu avoir une demi finale Connors/ Noah et la face du tennis en aurait été changée... lol
Connors a retourné beaucoup situations désespérées dans sa carrière. Je pense notamment à un certain match contre Vijay Amritraj en quart à Wimbledon (la flemme de rechercher l'année). Match incroyable, j'ai encore des étoiles dans les yeux. Born Borg lui avait fait la même en demi...
Nah in the cbs rundown of this legendary Connors run, can tell P Mac is just like "never make the mistake of assuming you won the match against Connors"... Krickstein on the other hand, must be pissed he's only remembered for losing that epic 5 setter lol
Du bist ein bißchen dumm, oder? 😀 Wenn Djokovic in den 1980ern oder 1990ern gespielt hätte, dann nicht so wie er heute spielt. Er würde dann mit dem Material der Zeit spielen, den Bällen der Zeit, und auf den Belägen der Zeit, und würde nach den Trainingsmethoden der Zeit trainieren. Und natürlich würder NICHT 6:0 6:0 gewinnen, lol. Und würden Connors, oder Becker heute spielen, dann würden sie natürlich nicht wie in den 80ern oder 90ern spielen, sondern mit dem heutigen Material und den heutigen Bällen auf den heutigen Plätzen, und wären mit den heutigen Trainingsmethoden geschult worden. Sie würden so spielen, wie man heute spielt. Und die heutigen Spieler würden nicht so spielen wie sie spielen, wäre das Tennis nicht mit Hilfe der Leistungen der vorherigen Generation weiterentwickelt worden (Training, Material etc.) Alles baut auf allem Vorherigen auf, in jeder Sportart. Eine Steffi Graf hat bei ihrem French Open Sieg 1999 natürlich NICHT so gespielt wie bei ihrem ersten Sieg 1987. Sie hatte neue Schlägertechnik, neue Trainingsmethoden, und hatte ihr Game verändert. Und heute würde sie auch nicht spielen wie 1999, sondern wie 2023. Alle Spitzenspieler wären mit ziemlicher Sicherheit in einer anderen Zeit ebenfalls ganz vorne, denn Skill und Talent setzen sich immer durch. Ist nicht besonders schwer zu rallen,...ok für Dich schon.
And you can judge with all your years of professional tennis? Connors was already physically finished by the time he played Courier but what is your excuse?
Tennis at a professional level requires more athleticism rhan just about any sport. Badminton being one of the toughest sports to endure even for a short period of time. Some tennis matches go for 5 hours. Basketball players play at most for 30 minutes on average with many breaks and a slowdown of play when they are not dribbling. Please educate yourself on the different sports and try it moreovee before you knock the sport
The technology and materials didnt exist to create topspin in the 60s and 70s when connors started his career in tennis.everyone was hitting flat in those days except for borg, nastase and a few others in the late 70s who started to use topspin due to the new midsized tennis racquets. In this 1990 match connors is 39 years old so when he played in his prime it was the early 70s. Take a look at some older footage and you will see flat strokes were normal for all players just like the brother of mcenroe. You might have heard of him, john mcenroe. Have a nice day at school. Dont forget to pack your lunch for recess. Kids should not be allowed to comment in adult spaces....
I watched it live... I remember when Mary Carillo said that there was no way Connors could come back in the 3rd set... it was awesome to see him turn it around right after.
1:56:57 - - LMAO.... I remember her saying that...
I stayed up late to watch this live. It was amazing.
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
Still works 27 years later. Thrilling come back from good ol' Jimmy. And he had plenty more to give.
LMFAO
Little girls. Jimmy and johnny never won another major after 84.
i remember this was the summer going into my first year of high school, me and my buddies had spent our first summer playing tennis..then tuned into this entire Open..this match ill never forget!
First time my eyes teared up watching tennis match. What a man and a fighter. You make me proud born in 1952, the year of dragon. You are fire breathing dragon my man ~~.
Connors was my inspiration as a kid. First racquet was a T-2000 in the late 70's. Made jr and high school tennis teams with it before switching to a red Head before college.
Connor's tenacity was always electrifying while I was playing. Watching some of his late career matches In hindsight....we all knew this guy wasn't going to win majors after 1991. A good show at the time, yes.
Thanks.... this was ONE OF MY ALL TIME FAV MATCHES... then you add the rest he was able to do at that years US Open!!!!
Nice to see Jimmy and Patrick shakes hands and Jimmy showing affection for him.
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
1:54:00 Connors losing 4-6/ 6-7/ 0-3/ 0-40 "Patrick McEnroe cruising here in the third." 1:57:00 "Connors is very much down and out in this match. It's nearly impossible for him to come back". 3:39:00 Match Point.
for some reason he couldnt pull that off against Courier though
Jimmy Connors, best player in every time !!!
No.
Jim courier literally blew him off the court. Made connors look like a little girl.
Jimmy Connors....the man who invented the FIST PUMP !!! Every time you see a golfer, a baseball player, a basketball player, football player, tennis player, coaches on sidelines, etc.....all celebrating a great moment with the FIST PUMP....that body language began with a man named Jimmy Connors. He's the most exciting player to ever pick up a tennis racket, and he's DIRECTLY responsible for bring in the big money grand prizes into his sport if you were good enough to win a tournament. Every player should be obligated to donate one half of a percent of their yearly prize money into Jimmy Connor's bank account for that...he REFUSED to play for peanuts and he changed the entire culture of tennis.
Connors was built like a little girl.
He and mccenroe never won a slam after 84, even though they were still in their primes. The bigger. Stronger, faster athletes came into the game and blew these little girls off the court.
adoravo connors ,mi piaceva da morire il suo ateggiamento ,come portava i colpi sia il diritto come il suo magnifico rovescio portati con un eleganza che non o mai visto fare a nessuno ,dopo che a lasciato il tennis non cera nessuno che mi piaceva come lui e o lasciato di guardare il tennis ...fino al 2008 quando o visto la partita piu incredibile che o visto...la finale di wimbledon .. ..tra federer e nadal .e stata una rivelazione
Jimmy Connors is without a doubt a player of the century!
Leading Connors by two sets and a break is the absolute worst thing that can happen to a tennis player.
second absolute
leading Thomas Muster by two sets and a *match point* is the ultimate absolute worst thing that can happen to a tennis player
@@blackfalkon4189 not off clay
Patrick McEnroe was such a good sport at the end being gracious because the crowd was brutally against him for the entire match.
Thank you very much
I remember watching this match live on usa network as it went way past my bedtime as I had to be to work early, but it didnt matter , I wasnt going asleep on the east coast until the conclusion. one of the top 10 all time greatest US Open matches
I saw the Aaron Krickstien versus Connors and Paul Haarhuis versus Connors matches :)
1:56:57 - - LMAO.... I remember her saying that...
What a great upload
Jimmy was a great all court player.
Greatest comeback in tennis history: 2 sets to 0, 3 games to 0 and 40-0. 1:56:57 Mary Carillo: "You can see that Connors is very much down and out in this match; it's nearly impossible for him to come back." 3:39:30 Then afterwards Carillo says well he obviously isn't going to get any further; he got to the semis at age 39--oldest player of the modern era to do so.
Carillo is awful.
federer did
“the Iron Man of American tennis” indeed.
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
greatest fighther on court ever!
In his prime, in 1 single match, I pick Connors over anybody. Sure, he’s tanked sets and could be beaten in big matches. But he never choked under pressure. That’s why I would take him against anyone in his prime. He could force his opponents to choke.
against anty of his contemporaries yeah but when slightly larger more athletic guys came along, like Sampras, connors would have had no chance.
Agreed, at the US Open - but not against Borg at Wimbledon.
@@dmmusicmusic That's incorrect. Connors played Sampras the next year (1992) and although he lost in straight sets (best of 3), he broke pistol Pete's serve 3 times. When you get to 39-40 years old, everything you do slows down on the court, and you lose a bit of a step. You also lose explosive power. Connors at his peak would have beaten Sampras. Keep in mind that Sampras had a lot of trouble against Boris Becker, and actually said Becker was the best indoor player in the world. And although Connors never beat Becker, he came damn close at Queens. And Connors was even head to head with Edberg, who often beat Becker. Often it's a matter of style.
@@lawrence1318 Connors had big losing h2h against Borg, McEnroe and Lendl, and you're telling me in his prime he would beat Sampras? His old school style wouldn't match up against Pete's power tennis. Yes, he broke Pete's serve three times in '92 because he is great fighter and can be intimidating (Pete was still below prime, remember), but all his opponent had to do was play his tennis to win easily. Next you will say Connors in his prime could beat Federer. Roger at 40 would beat Jimmy in his prime.
Edit: Would like to add that all matches except last one between Connors and Becker were when the latter was just a kid. Sure, he won big events as a teenager, but I could see him getting intimidated by someone of Jimmy's character. Becker still won those matches. Both in their prime, Jimmy gets blasted.
@@philjohnson9320 You suffer from wet-behind-the-ears disease.
Connors overtook Borg in 82. Watch their exhibition match from that year.
Connors was at least 5 years older than his rivals (often much more). If you compare Connors vs McEnroe ranking v age, there is no comparison: McEnroe gets left for dead. Running around a tennis court for an additional 5 years takes its toll.
Sampras had already won the U.S open when Connors played him, and Connors was 40. So breaking Pistol Pete's serve 3 times in a 2 set match, was incredible. If you watch the match, Connors was simply tired at certain stages. Connors actually played Sampras twice: the first time he took the first set to a tie-break.
Connors beat Agassi 3 times in a row in the same exhibition tournament in 1989, after he had already lost twice to Agassi in the 88 and 89 U.S Open. So once Connors got a read on his opponent, he started to dominate him. In fact in the exhibition tournament, Connors was injured and hobbling on one leg, and still beat Agassi. You can find that match in the net and watch Connors completely dominate Agassi.
You can't compare the prime of one era with another, as there is an evolution of speed which the players progressively adopt and which becomes the new context. (This is similar to comparing an old movie to a new one: the old is dated in mannerisms and speech and yet the actors at the time were modern for the time.) All you can do is look at the players with regard to their rivals, and also with regard to how they matched up against newer players. Connors is king in this regard.
Connors still holds certain records, the chief of these being most professional wins of any male player in history (109). Federer is at 103 currently and is known to be trying to catch Jimmy's record.
On the eve of Wimbledon 2013, the chairman of the Royal Tennis Assoc of England publicly announced that Connors was the greatest player of all time. His source was most likely the 2 university studies which had analysed all matches played in all majors since 1969. You can find those studies from North Western University and a university in England whose name escapes me at present. The conclusion was from the universities' statistics departments and used a lot of high-falutin' maths. They were unbiased statistics projects.
Frustrating the TV coverage cuts out the best part of the match. Connors was down 0-40 in the 4th game of the 3rd set and down 0-3 in the set. The coverage cuts away and comes back at 1-3 where suddenly Connors has all the momentum.
To "good" old days where networks had complete control over what one could and could not watch, forcing you to watch commercials during live matches. Don't miss that at all.
Bad luck for Patty Mac, great run for Jimmy!!
connors fought so hard in the 2nd set and still lost it, most players probably would have given up then espcially at 39.that bad no call got connors pissed and gave him the energy he needed to win the 4th set and the 5th
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
Oh...THAT McEnroe.
I did born 1 month later… too bad I could enjoy this live
Correction: I was born 1 month later. Too bad I couldn't enjoy this live.
What year did you learn to spell, and construct sentences? Oh , that’s in the future.
The good old days when men's shorts were SHORT... LOL
Women still wear the short skirts, though, haaaaaaa! xD
They are still too long though. In the early 80's the tennis fashion was at it's peak
Jimbo is awesome
I would love to know what brother John said to brother Patrick after the match. "Damnit man, you let the jerk off the hook." or would it be "Don't feel bad, that's what Connors does."
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
Title should have been Connors vs. Patrick McEnroe.
Yes nobody cares about Patrick
Someone, someday, should tell those commentators that (surprise, surprise) they are not the stars, that they should not reluctantly stop talking after the points started and generally behave like the players are just an unavoidable nuisance to their commetary.
I don't care which era you put Jimmy Conners in. Every player is going to hope that someone else will beat him before they have to play him.
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
39 yo Connors playing 25 yo Mac .I think those ages correct.i loved Patrick Mac style of play.he is very good .I wish he advanced and wished I saw him play more.i liked this match .I was at open I think this year..can't remember ..no I wasn't I just remembered where I was .I started new career ..I love us open season..soon!!
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
@@JimmyConnors-cy2xt jimmy you were a jerk 🤣
In 1982, I left the Jet opener when they were losing to Miami 45-14, walked over to Flushing Meadow, and caught the last three sets of the Connors-Lendl US Open final (won by Connors), sitting 20 rows above the net. A friend tipped me off that the tickettakers used to watch the match after letting everyone in so no one was at the gates after the first set of the main match started. Wonder if that had changed by 1991 it certainly isn't the case now.
Haha, good for u....condolences on being a jet fan, we were their cousins back in the day, patriot fan ....lucked out with bb and Brady
It Must have been amazing.
I watched the match in Australia
I really admired Connors fighting spirit, would have been great to see him play live
Best regards
WAS THERE LIKE A HUMONGOUS GENERATOR AT THE SIDE OF THE COURT ? WHAT IS THE MOTOR NOISE ALWAY THROUGH THE MATCH IT WAS DRIVING ME NUTS .. Other than that great upload love seeing matches like this as they were not broadcast in the UK when i was a kid in the UK they only care about Wimbledon.
Bon parcours des deux anciens et légendes Connors et Lendl ,hélas arrêtés chacun en demi-finale en trois sets par des joueurs plus jeune et plus frais ,Edberg vainqueur de Wimbledon 90 et courrier le vainqueur de Roland Garros 91
Connors a massive influence on Hewitt.
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
Jimmy certainly squeezed every last ounce of talent out of his career
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
Borat at 1:27:54?
Autant John a son petit caractère,Patrick c la discrétion même,une retenue et un détachement qui n est pas pour déplaire
This match definitely needed the, ahem, Mac Cam.
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
I wonder why this is not titled Connors v P. McEnroe. Clickbait.
Connors played great, but he wouldn't have won this match under today's rules. In the last set he was sometimes taking more than a minute to serve, killing time until he could catch his breath.
Plus, Jim courier literally blew him off the court. He looked like a little girl against courier
@@bradhuskers Courier was 21 years old, Connors was THIRTY NINE
@@benphilips7235
So?
How old is Nadal?
Federer ?
These players are winning majors at advanced ages.
Connors couldn't sniff a major.
@2:32 jimmy really tried one didn't he? don't play the serve cal it out and protest. Looked like it caught the corner to me.
Patrick looks bigger than his brother, so I don't think Jimmy wants to bully Patrick 😃
That's funny. He is a little bigger though.
Right on..Connors, as we all know, when first played Johnny Mac, at Wimbledon, in the semis ( forgot the date ) Connors pulled out the win in four tough sets, realized that Mac was real..
Stich was the Wimbledon champ that year and Carillo still didn't know how to pronounce his name. God, I can't stand her.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Remember Vitas would play with a ball in his hand.
On a vu aussi Connors retourner des situations désespérées dans des matchs de Roland Garros
Ainsi qu'à Wimbledon, en 1987 contre Pernfors !
oui Caujolle ...et s'il n'y avait pas eu une balle let contre Roger Vasselin...on aurait pu avoir une demi finale Connors/ Noah et la face du tennis en aurait été changée... lol
Connors a retourné beaucoup situations désespérées dans sa carrière. Je pense notamment à un certain match contre Vijay Amritraj en quart à Wimbledon (la flemme de rechercher l'année). Match incroyable, j'ai encore des étoiles dans les yeux. Born Borg lui avait fait la même en demi...
Vitas !!
Boy the way jimmy played, nirvana songs that made the hit parade, even guys like me getting laid, those were the daaaaaays
1:54:00 the comeback begins
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
ohhhhh Patrick McEnroe, meh.
There you go.
The night Pat McEnroe said F U to tennis ...
What? hardly. He was only 24, and in 1995 he reaches the quarters of the US Open.
@@theenglishalpinist5031 He was 25 at the time
Champion Jimmy
1:53:09 foreshadowing
2:31:49
As Arthur Ashe said “ jimmys an asshole but he’s everyone’s favorite Asshole”
Il doit être tellement heureux de battre un Mac Enroe.........pour une fois
Fueron muchas chico
Turned off after 26 seconds after realising it's John's brother 😂😂
You had to be there that night! I had friends who left at 2-love. I stayed. The start of a magical run by Jimbo!!
Interested in more games with McEnroe, Connors and Borg on DVD? Mail me for a list at: Sportdiggare@mail.com.
Thanks for the love and support you show me as a loyal of mine not withstanding how long have you been a fan of mine❤
1 h 30 am champions Jimmy
How did P. McEnroe get into the pro circuit with a backhand that bad? It's just a short push, not even a swing!
tennis really sucked back in the day.
No. It is called generating power using your opponents power. Many still do it today. Ever heard of medvedev?
Ok I understand the Mary Carrillo hate on the comments but she is so much better now
パトリック・マッケンローかな？
I never liked Jimmy Conners
and you even don't know his surname
patrick mcenroe's claim to fame. you can tell patrick hates connors.
Nah in the cbs rundown of this legendary Connors run, can tell P Mac is just like "never make the mistake of assuming you won the match against Connors"... Krickstein on the other hand, must be pissed he's only remembered for losing that epic 5 setter lol
Die haben ja teilweise gespielt damals wie kranke Hühner. Das waren geschobene Schläge. 0:6, 0:6 gegen Djokovic würde das ausgehen.
Du bist ein bißchen dumm, oder? 😀 Wenn Djokovic in den 1980ern oder 1990ern gespielt hätte, dann nicht so wie er heute spielt. Er würde dann mit dem Material der Zeit spielen, den Bällen der Zeit, und auf den Belägen der Zeit, und würde nach den Trainingsmethoden der Zeit trainieren. Und natürlich würder NICHT 6:0 6:0 gewinnen, lol.
Und würden Connors, oder Becker heute spielen, dann würden sie natürlich nicht wie in den 80ern oder 90ern spielen, sondern mit dem heutigen Material und den heutigen Bällen auf den heutigen Plätzen, und wären mit den heutigen Trainingsmethoden geschult worden. Sie würden so spielen, wie man heute spielt.
Und die heutigen Spieler würden nicht so spielen wie sie spielen, wäre das Tennis nicht mit Hilfe der Leistungen der vorherigen Generation weiterentwickelt worden (Training, Material etc.) Alles baut auf allem Vorherigen auf, in jeder Sportart.
Eine Steffi Graf hat bei ihrem French Open Sieg 1999 natürlich NICHT so gespielt wie bei ihrem ersten Sieg 1987. Sie hatte neue Schlägertechnik, neue Trainingsmethoden, und hatte ihr Game verändert. Und heute würde sie auch nicht spielen wie 1999, sondern wie 2023.
Alle Spitzenspieler wären mit ziemlicher Sicherheit in einer anderen Zeit ebenfalls ganz vorne, denn Skill und Talent setzen sich immer durch. Ist nicht besonders schwer zu rallen,...ok für Dich schon.
Connors made it thru, and then Jim courier literally blew him off the court. Courier made Connors look like a little girl.
Du weisst schon wie alt Connors damals war,oder?
You´re really blockhead....
@@Raimund6602
Yes, connors acts like a "tough guy" on the tennis court, but in reality, he's built like a little girl.
@@lukasbrandejs1456
Gurly
And you can judge with all your years of professional tennis? Connors was already physically finished by the time he played Courier but what is your excuse?
jimmy connors the bad boy of tennis isnt that like being toughest kid in ballet class🤣
Tennis at a professional level requires more athleticism rhan just about any sport. Badminton being one of the toughest sports to endure even for a short period of time. Some tennis matches go for 5 hours. Basketball players play at most for 30 minutes on average with many breaks and a slowdown of play when they are not dribbling. Please educate yourself on the different sports and try it moreovee before you knock the sport
Hershel walker did ballet
Patrick's backhand stinks !
Another child who doesnt understand that in 1990 racquets and strings were not the same.
Connors had the UGLIEST ground strokes.
The technology and materials didnt exist to create topspin in the 60s and 70s when connors started his career in tennis.everyone was hitting flat in those days except for borg, nastase and a few others in the late 70s who started to use topspin due to the new midsized tennis racquets. In this 1990 match connors is 39 years old so when he played in his prime it was the early 70s.
Take a look at some older footage and you will see flat strokes were normal for all players just like the brother of mcenroe. You might have heard of him, john mcenroe.
Have a nice day at school. Dont forget to pack your lunch for recess.
Kids should not be allowed to comment in adult spaces....
@@vincentl3911 it’s Labor Day, there’s no school. LOL. back to bed, gramps.