I know of an instance where a police officer reached his hand in the fence and got bit. He said there was a "Beware Of Dog" sign and he should not have reached inside the fence.
I can see that, but it could also be so the dog doesn’t accidentally get out as you open the gate. Or a deterrent to potential thieves that a dog may be roaming outside or is inside the home and might want to rethink their target.
There’s a big difference between intelligence and common sense! I ain’t no lawyer, but if I see a sign that says ‘beware of dog’, I’m not even getting close!
She clearly was not in control of her dog. Her dog was pulling her all over. Common sense does demand that she should have not allowed her dog to get right at the fence.
Agree-I actually said that out loud when I started watching this video: “oh, she’s really pretty!” Very poised too…just unfortunately didn’t have a good enough case against the defendant.
I believe that when her dog charged at the gate to bark at the gm Shepard, the dog’s paw went under the gate and the Shepard seized that opportunity and grabbed the dog’s paw.
But how did his dog get a hold of hers? A paw is not like a hand. His dog couldn't grab her dogs paw. In order for her dogs paw to get grabbed, her dog must have put her paw under the gate and his dog chomped down on it! Meaning her dog put it's paw on his property.
I walk dogs as part of my income. This incident was completely the Plaintiff's fault. She never should've let her dog anywhere near that fence. She's undoubtedly the one that yanked her dog's shoulder out of it's socket when the shepherd grabbed hold of it's paw.
hi.. this is a show..and even in real life.. its not uncommon to admire a judge!.even if she is a no good!... .you people nitpickers.. trying hard to find.. reason to dislike plaintiff.. be blessed
@@Cubanflowers You are entirely wrong in your assessment of me and my opinion of the plaintiff in this case! I don’t “nitpick” and never have! Please don’t make assumptions - about me or anyone else - based on ONE COMMENT written on RUclips, because nine times out of ten, you WILL BE JUST AS WRONG AS YOU ARE NOW!!!
@@Cubanflowers BTW - I do understand that your comment was directed more towards the other person than me, but your comment made me angry because I don’t appreciate when people make ignorant statements that are offensive and unfounded!!!
@@ruthcalfee7868 Hi, I SO understand your reaction here! I don’t have any other thing to add to this thread, I just felt like telling you that your reaction is completely valid, based on what I read here. Have a great day and take care!
from what I just saw in that short recording ...common sense tells me her dog went under the fence as opposed to his dog being able to stick its whole mouth under the fence then grab her dog and injure it.
😂 I love the way JM evens the playing field when someone says that they or their family are huge fans 😂 1:46 "I'm sure your family members are huge fans of mine too" 🤣😂🤣
@maiamiimaiam4343 out of all of the comments on here, you seem to target mine 🙎🏾♀️ Well my love, aren't you happy to have an opinion of your own 🤷🏾♀️. Hope that wasn't "Rude"😩🤷🏾♀️🥰🤣
@@ClaryPamela countdown to all the 'why do you people make everything about race' crew lmaooo. Cause never ONCE do you ever see that comment on a white video. Never.
Wtf. Why do you have to bring skin colour into this and make everything about that. No one mentioned anything about skin colour. It has got nothing to do with that. It's irrelevant. Stop using the black card. Smh.
This case is interesting. Initially, I was on the plaintiff's side, but then I considered how I’d handle the situation with my reactive dog. I would keep a tighter hold on the leash and possibly even walk around if I heard another dog barking as I approached, making sure not to let my dog get anywhere near the gate. My actions would primarily be to help my own dog stay calm. However, I can understand that if your dog isn’t typically reactive, you might not be as cautious, which could lead to more relaxed handling-resulting in a situation like this.
Bottom line, her dog drug her to the gate. She didn't have control at that moment. Had her dog not drug her to that gate, I think the outcome would be different.
@@ChasRiaStJohn --'dragged" is to be used for those who went pass grade 5. If you opted out of school and didn't go past grade 5, then you can use 'drug'. So she may have a point.
@@nom5205 drug is what's called 'common usage' in place of the word dragged. To he completely 'grammatically' correct, as in a court document, thesis is college, dragged would be more acceptable. In common language, even in a professional setting, 'drug' would be an affordable word, because using it in another past context would make no sense. @ChasRiaStJohn, hope you had a learning experience ♥️
Disagree with that assumption. The dogs were walking in front of her, so the GS grabbed the plaintiff’s dog’s paw before she walked past. Then she realized her one dog was in difficulty and started tugging violently on the leash to try to effect the release of her dog.
As a lawyer she shouldn’t have brought this case to the court. She knew actually what happened but she didn’t bank on him having multiple cameras around the home.
Very pretty, very demure & very sophisticated. But don’t take accountability for her actions, girl your dog you didn’t have control of. Your dog ran up on his fence.
The plaintiff was already on notice that the defendant had a guard dog and heard him barking. She admitted she had been walking past his fence/gate and had done that many times before, so she knew she was taking a risk! It baffles me how lawyers who are litigants are so quick to disrespect the judge when the verdict doesn’t go their way!!! Ha ha to her 😂😂😂
I feel like you say that because she’s black. Any other time someone animals get hurt. You people be all in a tizzy about it. I’m not defending her. But your tone towards her is very sinister. You think it’s funny. She was wrong but her dog was hurt. I thought you people valued an animals life over humans. Interesting
@@blacknerdygirlsrock Who TF do you think you are to outright accuse me of being prejudiced - based on my comment, without knowing me at all? I am appalled at your ignorance and utter audacity to make such a claim about a person you know nothing about!!! I swear, you have me so infuriated and I DEMAND an immediate apology, now!
@@blacknerdygirlsrock OMG I am so angry over your assumptions of me! I never once implied that anything about this case was “funny”, as you put it. She was not only wrong but was looking for a payday because of her own stupidity. One more thing - IDK what “you people” you’re referring to, but I have never “valued an animal’s life over humans”! I am genuinely getting more infuriated by the second at your personal and unfounded assertion that I must be prejudiced just based on a simple comment!!!
I don't agree..the point of the fence is to contain the dog... I would have said I didn't know the paw would come out and grab my dog. You just don't think about that cuz there's a fence. The dog went out of the property...
@@mymobilebuddy4392I think she was being sneaky. I don’t think she knew there was video footage and most judges can use their eyes and see she had no control of her dog and the dog behind the gate barely had any clearance. This case with all of the evidence looks horrible for her. Not to mention this case is older and $5,000 to pop a dog’s elbow back into place would probably be lower than $1,000. Probably would be around $400 max $500. Where she got the $5,000 makes no sense
How tf the dog behind that gate *pull* the cocker spaniel? 😂 It's so funny to imagine the shepherd reaching out with a human like hand and pulling the spaniel's paw
@@berryhij1 Better now than yesterday, thanks! This particular episode, the comment I made about it, and the ignorant comment I received because of it was almost my undoing! However, today is a new opportunity for happiness, so here’s to us all having an amazing day!!! Cheers!
her dog stuck her paw under into the yard cause if the GS had stuck his paw out it wouldn't be able to grab the other dogs paw and pull it in the little dog stuck its paw under
Exactly what i just said. His dog can't grab a paw with his paw it's not like a hand. Her dog had to put is paw under the gate where his dog could bite down on it!
She had no control of her dog. She let her dog pull her to the fence. Her dogs paw went under the fence, the Shepard grabbed the paw (with his teeth) she pulled the lease and because of the awkward position her dog was caught in, that's why her dogs shoulder got hurt. Any logical person would understand this, and she clearly knows it happened that way. She's just being cheap and a lawyer. She'll bully anyone into giving her money.
Plaintiff in the hallway: “blahblah…. Unfortunately I didn’t have a warning, now I do…” You HAD a warning!! “Beware Of Dog”……..!! That means that you should be AWARE OF THE DOG…!!! It’s not that complicated… Only when you try to spin it into a narrative that can earn you some cash, THAT’S WHEN it get’s complicated…!!!! 🙄
Common sense will tell you if you hear a dog barking crazy don’t walk next to the fence walk somewhere else turn around go the other way you’re at Saul lady
The title brought me here because I despise pet cases. It was exactly as I thought but I wasn't sure who would win. I'm glad that this one was different and happy the dog is okay.
There is no way a dog---his dog--can actually reach under that 2.5 inch space and grab another dog that is just walking by. Her dog went to the gate and started fighting through that space. She didn't have control of her dog. The "way" is to better train your dog so to have control and it be better disciplined.
I just heard "her dog's ARM" and thought Zootopia EXTREME was suddenly a thing... Also, lady, for someone who's a lawyer, you seem a little ignorant about what that sign could've hinted at... "Beware of Dog" signs are normally not used as a joke or to be cute - these normally have a larger breed. There are actually ones for specific breeds as well and quite frankly, I'd treat them as seriously if it were a pit bull or a poodle. Any sized dog can be vicious, especially to strangers. It's best to not take that risk, especially if you are also a pet owner. Yes, dogs bark as a form of communication, but note that not all are gonna be like 101 Dalmations where it's used to help one another. Some are barking to say "GET BACK! THIS IS MY TERRITORY" and not just "hey, how ya doing?". If you can't see the dog's posture (wagging tail, showing teeth, etc), it's best to treat it as a form of protecting its turf - even if you think it could simply be greeting you.
Even if a paw fits in a 2.5 inch gap, it’s unlikely that the snout of a German Shepherd would fit in the same gap and be able to grab the foot of another dog. I have to believe that the Cocker Spaniel’s foot went under the fence.
I'm surprised the lawyer-plaintiff does not realize she has no case. Her dog pulled toward the fence and engaged a dog barking on its own property. Also her dog should be on her outside away from the fences she is passing as she can see how upsetting it is to fenced-in dogs to have another dog near it's boundary.
I don’t honestly agree with this verdict. It’s a PUBLIC sidewalk…if the dog behind the fence is able to bite or paw grab behind the fence to the sidewalk then the dog got out! People and animals should be able to be walked on public space without feeling like they will be attacked or have to move! Obviously the defendant put a piece of wood from it happening again so that means his dog was in the wrong and the plaintiff should have won the medical bills.
yeah, I feel like it definitely could have gone either way and was simply a judgment call. Another judge very easily could have ruled for the plaintiff in this case. 🤷🏼♀️
I knew she wouldn’t win this case before even hearing it with the claim amount! She NEVER grants high amount since her shows budget is the one paying the judgement!
I'm sorry. His gate looked solidly built. I would suspect her dog ran over and stuck it's leg under the fence, and when she was pulling like crazy on the video, she dislocated the dogs shoulder. No bites were involved, and in all my years (way to many) of having and training dogs, I have never seen one use 1 paw to trap and hold another dog's leg... Just sayin'.
lolwut!! Didn't know beware of dog meant beware of dog? I hope the whole world sees this and never hires her as a lawyer. If she doesn't know the definition of the word "beware", what else will she play dumb with.
I'm not sure about this verdict. My common sense says that a beware of dog sign covers the property containing the dog not the sidewalk beyond that property. I can see this was a difficult call but there should have at the very least been shared responsibility. 👀
Another issue is that the plaintiff is already put on notice that there is a beware of dog sign on the defendant’s gate with a dog that barks every time another dog passes by the fence. She appeared on the video to have plenty of sidewalk to walk her dog further away from the fence, or make sure her dog is on the street side when walking past the defendant’s property.
That's exactly why i have a beware of dog sign.. My dog isn't aggressive, but she is old and there have been people my dog just didn't like.. Dogs can sense a lot about a person..
The fact that JM didn't point this out had me yelling (in my head) at the screen... it had nothing to do with "pawS" plural, it's the other dog's MOUTH that was the the factor and it would be impossible for it's mouth to get under the fence, let alone grab ahold of another dog. Absolute nonsense.
One thing you should never do is put up a "Beware of Dog" sign on your property. As the plaintiff stated, it could be construed in court that the sign indicates a viscous dog is on the property and the owner knew it was viscous. A smarter move would be a sign that just politey stated "Dog on Premises".
@@barbarapaton4005 I agree you have a right to. I'm only stating that having such a sign could arguably be pitched to a jury that you knew your dog was viscous and you didn't take extraordinary efforts to protect people from it. You never know how a jury might be swayed. Saying "Dog on Premises" does the same thing without admitting the dog's ability to bite their ass off.
I disagree totally. You should ALWAYS put up a sign if you are afraid of your dog biting someone. You are warning people that you have a dog that may or may not bite. It becomes a liability issue. My friend had a dog that bit a cop when he reached in the fence.. My friend had a beware of dog sign. The cop said, I should not have reached in the fence after I saw the sign.
It all boils down to common sense really. If she had taken this route multiple times as she stated, then she knew about this particular dog and the sign on the fence. All the had to do was switch the dogs from her right side to her left so that they wouldn't be near the fence. Simple solution. Her leash was too long and the dogs were walking her not the other way around. This judgement was fair.
I have a small yorkie and live in the country. New neighbors moved in down the road. They have a pitbull and I’m assuming an underground electric fence type setup. A quarter mile the other direction, the same thing with 2 large dogs. My yorkie does not go for walks other than in my yard. She is too precious to me to take that chance.
I wouldn't use her as my attorney. She wasn't even smart enough to get off the sidewalk to protect her dog and didn't abide by the tell tale sign. smh...
People that can't control their dog, should not be walking that close to a beware of dog sign. Her dog was not big, and she still can't control the dog smh.
I think it's more likely that her dog ran and put his paw under the gate. Even if the homeowner's dog can put his paw under I don't see how it is that he can grab her dogs paw and pull it under to bite it .
The judge's decision is WRONG. A fence that has a sign 'beware of dog' to me means that if I enter the property 'BEWARE' but not if I walk in front of the gate. Even if her dog pulled her closer to the fence, her dog isn't going to stick its own paw under the fence, so for the defendant's dog to have bitten her dog's paw means his dog stuck its mouth over the threshold and was now on public property to be able to grab the paw...
It's ridiculous to say it's her fault . Think about if there is traffic coming and I'm walking my child , and my child was the one injured from just walking past someone's fence .
Anytime I've seen a Beware of Dog sign I automatically think it's a not so friendly dog behind the gate or on their property. And I take heed!
I know of an instance where a police officer reached his hand in the fence and got bit. He said there was a "Beware Of Dog" sign and he should not have reached inside the fence.
I can see that, but it could also be so the dog doesn’t accidentally get out as you open the gate. Or a deterrent to potential thieves that a dog may be roaming outside or is inside the home and might want to rethink their target.
She needs to go back to law school.
Likewise 👍🏾✌🏾
😊😅😂@@joemancurreri6635
Lawyers don't have a good track record on this show 😂
I think the smart lawyers know when they have no case in the first place.
"That's your opinion."
No, that's my ruling, PAL!
That's because this "Attorney" wanted her day of fame. Most likely a public defender.
Being a lawyer doesn't specify what TYPE or lawyer, or if they're any good at it....
There’s a big difference between intelligence and common sense! I ain’t no lawyer, but if I see a sign that says ‘beware of dog’, I’m not even getting close!
She clearly was not in control of her dog. Her dog was pulling her all over. Common sense does demand that she should have not allowed her dog to get right at the fence.
And the fence is on his property, she, by allowing her dog trespassing by being at the fence within 3”
But sometimes Lassie needs to be off leash to get help for lil’ jimmy who fell down the well 😢
@@bash547 😂
@@bash547 the kids name is TIMMY NOT JIMMY..DUUUUUH
@@bash547I just can't with you 🤣😂🤣
Plaintiff and her dogs were too close to the gate. The man said he’s been robbed so the dog was just doing its job.
She couldn’t pull that little dog back? Can’t walk dogs you can’t totally control 🤦🏽♂️
The video shows she did not have full control of her dog, she allowed the dog to pull her away and didn't have full control
Exactly. That's what I was thinking.
The plaintiff is drop dead, gorgeous, and so well put together. Absolutely beautiful.
She has lots of style too.
I agree
Agree-I actually said that out loud when I started watching this video: “oh, she’s really pretty!” Very poised too…just unfortunately didn’t have a good enough case against the defendant.
Smart too lol!
Before I even started the episode I wanted to swing straight to the comments to see who saw what saw,she is absolutely gorgeous indeed
I believe that when her dog charged at the gate to bark at the gm Shepard, the dog’s paw went under the gate and the Shepard seized that opportunity and grabbed the dog’s paw.
No, if the little dog put its paw or any part of its body underneath the fence, it is trespassing. The German Shepherd is just doing its job.
The plaintiff is classy and naturally beautiful. I love that she's rockin' her natural hair.
Me too, she's so softly beautiful
But how did his dog get a hold of hers? A paw is not like a hand. His dog couldn't grab her dogs paw. In order for her dogs paw to get grabbed, her dog must have put her paw under the gate and his dog chomped down on it! Meaning her dog put it's paw on his property.
Seems like that's what happened
Same thing I was thinking!
And that's exactly why she lost.
Thats what I was thinking.
I agree
Defendant is in the right
I walk dogs as part of my income. This incident was completely the Plaintiff's fault. She never should've let her dog anywhere near that fence. She's undoubtedly the one that yanked her dog's shoulder out of it's socket when the shepherd grabbed hold of it's paw.
I didn't even think about that part, pulling the dog caused injury herself. It makes sense though.
She was yanking very hard. I think you’re right.
She’s a lawyer and still tried to kiss up to the judge 🥴
Until after the verdict that is! She was quick to throw shade on Judge Milian out in the hallway, like a petulant child!!! 😂😂😂❤❤❤
hi.. this is a show..and even in real life.. its not uncommon to admire a judge!.even if she is a no good!...
.you people nitpickers.. trying hard to find.. reason to dislike plaintiff.. be blessed
@@Cubanflowers You are entirely wrong in your assessment of me and my opinion of the plaintiff in this case! I don’t “nitpick” and never have! Please don’t make assumptions - about me or anyone else - based on ONE COMMENT written on RUclips, because nine times out of ten, you WILL BE JUST AS WRONG AS YOU ARE NOW!!!
@@Cubanflowers BTW - I do understand that your comment was directed more towards the other person than me, but your comment made me angry because I don’t appreciate when people make ignorant statements that are offensive and unfounded!!!
@@ruthcalfee7868 Hi, I SO understand your reaction here!
I don’t have any other thing to add to this thread, I just felt like telling you that your reaction is completely valid, based on what I read here.
Have a great day and take care!
from what I just saw in that short recording ...common sense tells me her dog went under the fence as opposed to his dog being able to stick its whole mouth under the fence then grab her dog and injure it.
😂 I love the way JM evens the playing field when someone says that they or their family are huge fans 😂 1:46 "I'm sure your family members are huge fans of mine too" 🤣😂🤣
That was rude
@maiamiimaiam4343 out of all of the comments on here, you seem to target mine 🙎🏾♀️ Well my love, aren't you happy to have an opinion of your own 🤷🏾♀️. Hope that wasn't "Rude"😩🤷🏾♀️🥰🤣
Great case. Well if she gets tired of being a lawyer she can always fallback on modeling.
Beautiful lady. Speaks so well too.
So you’re saying she speaks so well to be black because you definitely wouldn’t say that about a white person.
@@ClaryPamela countdown to all the 'why do you people make everything about race' crew lmaooo. Cause never ONCE do you ever see that comment on a white video. Never.
Wtf. Why do you have to bring skin colour into this and make everything about that. No one mentioned anything about skin colour. It has got nothing to do with that. It's irrelevant. Stop using the black card. Smh.
No one might have mentioned it, but in my 52 years on this Earth. I've never heard one white person referred to as that they speak well. 😢😮
@@princessjagdeeppanesar5283 no I have to agree. I never see people comment 'oh s/he speaks so well' about a white person lol.
She is beautiful
NO wig! She's a rarity.
🔥🔥🔥
I said the same thing when I first saw her. She’s gorgeous!
She’s a very beautiful lady.
This case is interesting. Initially, I was on the plaintiff's side, but then I considered how I’d handle the situation with my reactive dog. I would keep a tighter hold on the leash and possibly even walk around if I heard another dog barking as I approached, making sure not to let my dog get anywhere near the gate. My actions would primarily be to help my own dog stay calm. However, I can understand that if your dog isn’t typically reactive, you might not be as cautious, which could lead to more relaxed handling-resulting in a situation like this.
If I ever see a beware of dog sign I always crossed the street. I assume it's a vicious dog. Lol 😂
Bottom line, her dog drug her to the gate. She didn't have control at that moment. Had her dog not drug her to that gate, I think the outcome would be different.
*dragged. Drug is a substance. I’ve never heard drag used in that context in its past tense form. But nonetheless, completely agree.
@ChasRiaStJohn Nonetheless, go correct someone else. Thanks internet police.
@@ChasRiaStJohn --'dragged" is to be used for those who went pass grade 5. If you opted out of school and didn't go past grade 5, then you can use 'drug'. So she may have a point.
@@nom5205 drug is what's called 'common usage' in place of the word dragged. To he completely 'grammatically' correct, as in a court document, thesis is college, dragged would be more acceptable. In common language, even in a professional setting, 'drug' would be an affordable word, because using it in another past context would make no sense. @ChasRiaStJohn, hope you had a learning experience ♥️
Disagree with that assumption. The dogs were walking in front of her, so the GS grabbed the plaintiff’s dog’s paw before she walked past. Then she realized her one dog was in difficulty and started tugging violently on the leash to try to effect the release of her dog.
As a lawyer she shouldn’t have brought this case to the court. She knew actually what happened but she didn’t bank on him having multiple cameras around the home.
Very pretty, very demure & very sophisticated. But don’t take accountability for her actions, girl your dog you didn’t have control of. Your dog ran up on his fence.
The plaintiff was already on notice that the defendant had a guard dog and heard him barking. She admitted she had been walking past his fence/gate and had done that many times before, so she knew she was taking a risk! It baffles me how lawyers who are litigants are so quick to disrespect the judge when the verdict doesn’t go their way!!! Ha ha to her 😂😂😂
I feel like you say that because she’s black. Any other time someone animals get hurt. You people be all in a tizzy about it. I’m not defending her. But your tone towards her is very sinister. You think it’s funny. She was wrong but her dog was hurt. I thought you people valued an animals life over humans.
Interesting
@@blacknerdygirlsrock Who TF do you think you are to outright accuse me of being prejudiced - based on my comment, without knowing me at all? I am appalled at your ignorance and utter audacity to make such a claim about a person you know nothing about!!! I swear, you have me so infuriated and I DEMAND an immediate apology, now!
@@blacknerdygirlsrock OMG I am so angry over your assumptions of me! I never once implied that anything about this case was “funny”, as you put it. She was not only wrong but was looking for a payday because of her own stupidity. One more thing - IDK what “you people” you’re referring to, but I have never “valued an animal’s life over humans”! I am genuinely getting more infuriated by the second at your personal and unfounded assertion that I must be prejudiced just based on a simple comment!!!
@@blacknerdygirlsrock The nerve of you!!!!!!!!!!
@@blacknerdygirlsrock BTW - I don’t care about how you “feel”! Your feelings are irrelevant to me, as are your opinions, got it???
Dogs don't have thumbs. There's NO way his dog reached under the fence and grabbed hers with his paw smh
hi.. yes.. dogs can grab things.. did defendant dog.. grab this dog.. who knows.. the video didn't show!.. be blessed
I don't agree..the point of the fence is to contain the dog... I would have said I didn't know the paw would come out and grab my dog. You just don't think about that cuz there's a fence. The dog went out of the property...
Apparently she got her law degree from the University of Phoenix.
Wow
Sis is so softly beautiful
If she is an attorney, she is not a very good one.
How do you figure that? A ruling like this is up to a judge. Another judge could have ruled in her favor.
hi.. she better than you... oh but wait... are you a lawyer?... be blessed
@@mymobilebuddy4392I think she was being sneaky. I don’t think she knew there was video footage and most judges can use their eyes and see she had no control of her dog and the dog behind the gate barely had any clearance. This case with all of the evidence looks horrible for her.
Not to mention this case is older and $5,000 to pop a dog’s elbow back into place would probably be lower than $1,000. Probably would be around $400 max $500. Where she got the $5,000 makes no sense
@@mymobilebuddy4392 lol she was on his property tho
The 🐕 was taking her 4 a walk
What a nice Italian man ..
not italian,but israeli
Anyone with a dog and sees a sign, knows to clutch onto your dog and hold them close when passing.
Beware of dog means just that=beware. Shes ridiculous
How tf the dog behind that gate *pull* the cocker spaniel? 😂
It's so funny to imagine the shepherd reaching out with a human like hand and pulling the spaniel's paw
Good afternoon to my People’s Court friends. I hope everyone is having a good day so far. ❤
I’m gonna be the first to say HEY!!! I hope, anyway!!! 😂😂😂❤❤❤
Hello. How are you? Thank you so much. I hope you are too. ❤❤
@@ruthcalfee7868 You were first! It’s the next day now but I hope you’re having a great day. 🩷
@@princessjagdeeppanesar5283 Thank you so much! I’m pretty good. Can’t complain. Thanks for replying. ❤️
@@berryhij1 Better now than yesterday, thanks! This particular episode, the comment I made about it, and the ignorant comment I received because of it was almost my undoing! However, today is a new opportunity for happiness, so here’s to us all having an amazing day!!! Cheers!
She didn’t have full control of them dogs that’s all point blank
She really could’ve directed her dog onto the grass so they could walk past safely.
DUH shorten your dogs leashes DUH DUH DUH
Spend the time to train them better.
I love the defendant's accent 😂
Yippurs...Common Horse Sense to actually guide your dog Away from 'Beware of Dog' sign. Hence...'BEWARE' Helloooo
With that fence there I wouldn’t have thought a dog could reach under enough to actually cause harm to anyone, or anything!
her dog stuck her paw under into the yard cause if the GS had stuck his paw out it wouldn't be able to grab the other dogs paw and pull it in the little dog stuck its paw under
Exactly what i just said. His dog can't grab a paw with his paw it's not like a hand. Her dog had to put is paw under the gate where his dog could bite down on it!
When i see a beware of dog sign, I immediately cross the street
She had no control of her dog. She let her dog pull her to the fence. Her dogs paw went under the fence, the Shepard grabbed the paw (with his teeth) she pulled the lease and because of the awkward position her dog was caught in, that's why her dogs shoulder got hurt. Any logical person would understand this, and she clearly knows it happened that way. She's just being cheap and a lawyer. She'll bully anyone into giving her money.
Lack of common sense. The plaintiff is bitter at the Judge🤣🤣🤣
Plaintiff in the hallway: “blahblah…. Unfortunately I didn’t have a warning, now I do…”
You HAD a warning!!
“Beware Of Dog”……..!! That means that you should be AWARE OF THE DOG…!!!
It’s not that complicated…
Only when you try to spin it into a narrative that can earn you some cash, THAT’S WHEN it get’s complicated…!!!! 🙄
Common sense will tell you if you hear a dog barking crazy don’t walk next to the fence walk somewhere else turn around go the other way you’re at Saul lady
This is a rare case where Harvey talks to intelligent people on the streets. The first woman was very smart.
Unfortunately, it doesn't make him less annoying 😂
@@16MedicRN preach
Haha that’s very true 😆
The title brought me here because I despise pet cases. It was exactly as I thought but I wasn't sure who would win. I'm glad that this one was different and happy the dog is okay.
There is no way a dog---his dog--can actually reach under that 2.5 inch space and grab another dog that is just walking by. Her dog went to the gate and started fighting through that space. She didn't have control of her dog.
The "way" is to better train your dog so to have control and it be better disciplined.
People can be Booksmart, but streetsmart is another thing all together
Plaintiff reminds me a boring school teacher 😂
The injuries did not cost her 5k!
Plaintiff 'my mother loves you and told me to tell you hello'. Judge: Never says tell yr mom I said hello.
I just heard "her dog's ARM" and thought Zootopia EXTREME was suddenly a thing...
Also, lady, for someone who's a lawyer, you seem a little ignorant about what that sign could've hinted at...
"Beware of Dog" signs are normally not used as a joke or to be cute - these normally have a larger breed. There are actually ones for specific breeds as well and quite frankly, I'd treat them as seriously if it were a pit bull or a poodle. Any sized dog can be vicious, especially to strangers. It's best to not take that risk, especially if you are also a pet owner.
Yes, dogs bark as a form of communication, but note that not all are gonna be like 101 Dalmations where it's used to help one another. Some are barking to say "GET BACK! THIS IS MY TERRITORY" and not just "hey, how ya doing?". If you can't see the dog's posture (wagging tail, showing teeth, etc), it's best to treat it as a form of protecting its turf - even if you think it could simply be greeting you.
Facts! Every one of them!!! ❤❤❤
Love this comment!! Thanks!
Even if a paw fits in a 2.5 inch gap, it’s unlikely that the snout of a German Shepherd would fit in the same gap and be able to grab the foot of another dog. I have to believe that the Cocker Spaniel’s foot went under the fence.
Oh so now she changes her behavior as far as walking her dog?!? If she did nothing wrong, why would she change anything!
I'm surprised the lawyer-plaintiff does not realize she has no case. Her dog pulled toward the fence and engaged a dog barking on its own property. Also her dog should be on her outside away from the fences she is passing as she can see how upsetting it is to fenced-in dogs to have another dog near it's boundary.
I don’t honestly agree with this verdict. It’s a PUBLIC sidewalk…if the dog behind the fence is able to bite or paw grab behind the fence to the sidewalk then the dog got out! People and animals should be able to be walked on public space without feeling like they will be attacked or have to move! Obviously the defendant put a piece of wood from it happening again so that means his dog was in the wrong and the plaintiff should have won the medical bills.
If there is a beware the dog sign, then keep your dog pulled close to you.
9:56 huh that's exactly what that means love
She's lawyer. She knows better than to take this ridiculous case to court.
You're obviously wrong because she did.
yeah, I feel like it definitely could have gone either way and was simply a judgment call. Another judge very easily could have ruled for the plaintiff in this case. 🤷🏼♀️
I knew she wouldn’t win this case before even hearing it with the claim amount! She NEVER grants high amount since her shows budget is the one paying the judgement!
I'm sorry. His gate looked solidly built. I would suspect her dog ran over and stuck it's leg under the fence, and when she was pulling like crazy on the video, she dislocated the dogs shoulder. No bites were involved, and in all my years (way to many) of having and training dogs, I have never seen one use 1 paw to trap and hold another dog's leg... Just sayin'.
People gonna learn to stop having bad dog
lolwut!! Didn't know beware of dog meant beware of dog? I hope the whole world sees this and never hires her as a lawyer. If she doesn't know the definition of the word "beware", what else will she play dumb with.
I'm not sure about this verdict. My common sense says that a beware of dog sign covers the property containing the dog not the sidewalk beyond that property. I can see this was a difficult call but there should have at the very least been shared responsibility. 👀
Another issue is that the plaintiff is already put on notice that there is a beware of dog sign on the defendant’s gate with a dog that barks every time another dog passes by the fence. She appeared on the video to have plenty of sidewalk to walk her dog further away from the fence, or make sure her dog is on the street side when walking past the defendant’s property.
That's exactly why i have a beware of dog sign.. My dog isn't aggressive, but she is old and there have been people my dog just didn't like.. Dogs can sense a lot about a person..
The judge never lets the people fully talk. She’s not even done telling her story before she cuts her off to see the video
She’s walking her dog on the sidewalk smdh His gate should be fortified where his dog doesn’t get out AT ALL!!
The fact that JM didn't point this out had me yelling (in my head) at the screen... it had nothing to do with "pawS" plural, it's the other dog's MOUTH that was the the factor and it would be impossible for it's mouth to get under the fence, let alone grab ahold of another dog. Absolute nonsense.
They steady talking about the street with all that grass around. Just walk through the yard until you can get back to the sidewalk lol
Not his fault his dog was in his yard and behind the fence
One thing you should never do is put up a "Beware of Dog" sign on your property. As the plaintiff stated, it could be construed in court that the sign indicates a viscous dog is on the property and the owner knew it was viscous. A smarter move would be a sign that just politey stated "Dog on Premises".
I put up a Beware of the Dog sign to let people know that I have a dog who will protect my property. And I have a right to do so.
But the plaintiff said she basically ignored the sign because she couldn't fathom the sign meant "beware of vicious dog".
@@barbarapaton4005 I agree you have a right to. I'm only stating that having such a sign could arguably be pitched to a jury that you knew your dog was viscous and you didn't take extraordinary efforts to protect people from it. You never know how a jury might be swayed. Saying "Dog on Premises" does the same thing without admitting the dog's ability to bite their ass off.
I disagree totally. You should ALWAYS put up a sign if you are afraid of your dog biting someone. You are warning people that you have a dog that may or may not bite. It becomes a liability issue. My friend had a dog that bit a cop when he reached in the fence.. My friend had a beware of dog sign. The cop said, I should not have reached in the fence after I saw the sign.
@@mymobilebuddy4392 yeah I don't know in what world a warning sign would be seen as an admission of guilt/liability
It all boils down to common sense really. If she had taken this route multiple times as she stated, then she knew about this particular dog and the sign on the fence. All the had to do was switch the dogs from her right side to her left so that they wouldn't be near the fence. Simple solution. Her leash was too long and the dogs were walking her not the other way around. This judgement was fair.
Another example of how she has a pattern in her ruling. She's different with "Other" people
Tone is even different...watch about 20 episodes and see
I am terrified of dogs, no matter how small or large!
I have a small yorkie and live in the country. New neighbors moved in down the road. They have a pitbull and I’m assuming an underground electric fence type setup. A quarter mile the other direction, the same thing with 2 large dogs. My yorkie does not go for walks other than in my yard. She is too precious to me to take that chance.
I wouldn't use her as my attorney. She wasn't even smart enough to get off the sidewalk to protect her dog and didn't abide by the tell tale sign. smh...
Take accountability - She had the warning.
Sorry she let her dog walk to the gate. Glad the dog is ok
People that can't control their dog, should not be walking that close to a beware of dog sign. Her dog was not big, and she still can't control the dog smh.
I think her dog was trying to get through the fence to play or something and his dog thought it was an intruder and acted in self defense
The plaintiff is a beautiful woman.
I think it's more likely that her dog ran and put his paw under the gate. Even if the homeowner's dog can put his paw under I don't see how it is that he can grab her dogs paw and pull it under to bite it .
She takes absolutely no accountability smh that guy had his ducks in a row! Bravo
Lawyers don't always win in small claims court !!
The judge's decision is WRONG. A fence that has a sign 'beware of dog' to me means that if I enter the property 'BEWARE' but not if I walk in front of the gate. Even if her dog pulled her closer to the fence, her dog isn't going to stick its own paw under the fence, so for the defendant's dog to have bitten her dog's paw means his dog stuck its mouth over the threshold and was now on public property to be able to grab the paw...
Damn, playing the lawyer card didn't work for her
hi.. she didn't mention.. she was lawyer ..until MISS judge asked!..rewind video.. and try listen with your good ear...ok? yes!.... be blessed
@highlander666 She never mentioned anything about being a lawyer until JM asked her!
Also called “sue me signs”.
It's ridiculous to say it's her fault . Think about if there is traffic coming and I'm walking my child , and my child was the one injured from just walking past someone's fence .
Imagine me putting a beware of car sign on the front of my vehicle, rearending someone else's car, then blaming them for not moving out of my lane?
Right away I knew plaintiff has no case, its all her fault
I felt bad for the plaintiff, but she was dumb for staying after she saw the sign 😂
She didn't have warning?! There was a beware of dog sign!
You always have to be in control of your dog
She said afterward she pulls the leash tighter. She should have read the sign
His property line is 5' from the curb in NYC.. She was on his property.
The plaintiff is so pretty!! 🫶
Not a very bright lawyer.