For all those who watched the trial, we know: - she perjured herself on the stand - she admitted the article was about Depp - she falsified evidence, ie providing the same pictures for different alleged assaults - she staged pictures of his drug use - she took photographs of everything BUT her injuries - she failed to provide any medical records - she changed her abuse timeline midway through the trial to the very beginning of the relationship (yet she gave him a big knife early on) - she refused and failed to submit her phone and devices for discovery - she says the police, the park manager, everyone who wasn’t her witness were liars - she uses pledge and donate synonymously - Kate Moss was not pushed down the stairs as she claimed - evidence showed on and after her days of alleged abuse, she was flawless and enjoying life. Most humans would likely be at the hospital or recovering from such alleged injuries Almost forgot all the audio tapes… where she admitted she abused Depp, taunted him that no one will believe he is a DV victim, gaslighted him saying she didn’t punch but hit him, was constantly chasing him during fights when he wanted to leave to avoid escalating the situation, was under the influence despite her claims of not using anything….. The list goes on… and on… Forgot her physical abuse severed his finger… And she was definitely not afraid of her alleged abuser, ie took pictures sent to friends and mocked him. Feel free to add to the list if there’s anything else missing.
Yes the jury had to defend themselves against amber, she’s been speaking like they’re naive and unethical. They weren’t unethical. They sacrificed 6 weeks of their lives and just didn’t believe ambers stories or split second emotion changes.
The juror didn’t actually say “they both abused each other” stop twisting their words to make Amber look less guilty. Wth is wrong with you guys, why are you so adamant about defending this abuser. That being said I’m glad the juror spoke out, just wish it was to a more credible source so their words wouldn’t get twisted.
What was is that the juror said? Because that small statement struck me as totally out there. It really seemed like JD was just trying to cope with her abuse, more than anything. If the abuse had gone both ways, we absolutely would have seen it in court.
The jurors should not speak out to the major media anymore. They need to speak out to Darth News or the Umbrella Guy. The major media is not allowing the truth.
Jesus this juror absolutely destroyed amber lmao "all of us were very uncomfortable", " crocodile tears ", glad to see people didn't fell for her lies and fake crying on the stand
If you watched all of her testimony - that all tracks. My guess is that she believes her own lies and has a hard time understanding why others don’t. Sobriety and therapy will fix him. Not sure what can fix her. The jury got it right.
That means the rumors from people who were apparently inside the courtroom in the audience was true. They didn't want to make eye contact with her and loved Camille.
@@Cassandra-..- She has a serious personality disorder or many of them. There is no cure for that and a person can only be helped if they will admit it. Having narcissistic personality disorder precludes her from even admitting that there is anything wrong with her or that she is ever wrong about anything. She'll always insist that she was right and that this was all because JD is paying off everyone. It's too bad that he had to hook up with someone like her. He certainly did nothing to deserve this. Things will only get better for him from this point on. He deserves to have the truth about what happened known and how she managed to destroy his career but he can and will make a comeback. More people than ever are on his side now.
It was weird whenever she was asked a question her head would pivot to the jury and would answer to them. I thought it was strange and uncomfortable, and it turns out the jury thought the same.
I think her attorneys instructed that because I saw other witnesses on ambers side, like Dr. Hughes, do the same thing. I think it might be uncommon courtroom etiquette. Same reason why they all stand when the jury walks in and out. At the end of the day, youre appealing to the jury who will decide your fate, so it might be etiquette to address them directly. Please need to think more critically about these things.
@@TheWorldisQuietHere3 Yeah some of the lawyers on RUclips that covered it mentioned it was most likely suggested to her that she do it. However, the lawyers also need to be aware of what works and what doesn’t. If they see the jury isn’t responding well to the clients consistent eye contact, they need to adjust accordingly. Or perhaps they did, but she didn’t listen/got too adjusted to the habit 🤷🏻♀️
Huh. Here you say "the jury thought they were both the abusers," but I'm looking at a transcript from the interview that says, "They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don't think that makes either of them right or wrong. That's what you do when you get into an argument, I guess." HUGE difference from "they thought they were both abusers."
@@reidun-engh8824 Not that I've seen. What I HAVE seen is media twisting things and editing her responses to look more favorable. As in, before and after videos.
A lot of media and outlets are owned by the woke. They tell their people how and what to report. Was reading today an article titled "Amber Heard scores huge win over Johnny Depp after trial" and the article proceeded to just talk how she was still in Aquaman 2 even though a lot of fans called for her removal but even though she remained in the movie her scenes were drastically reduced and cut lol.
He’s essentially saying that he was verbally abusive, which his texts proved he was . I only feel he was emotionally and verbally abusive, Not physical .
I felt the same way too! A lawyer asks you a question. You ARE giving your answer to the lawyer! Constantly looking at the jury and giving your answer makes it seem like you are DESPERATE for them to believe whatever you’re saying ESPECIALLY if it’s a LIE!!!! And surely she MUST know that such acting would NOT win over the jury! They are there for the TRUTH, not what you want them to think is the truth🤷♀️
Juror explains mutually abusive comment: "They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying," he said. Link on GMA www.goodmorningamerica.com/culture/story/juror-johnny-depp-amber-heard-defamation-trial-speaks-85432281
Thank you to the juror for his time and service. I think it's disgraceful that after losing the case, AH is now saying the jury was influenced by social media, something the judge specifically asked the jury to stay away from. AH thinks everyone is like her: an unethical liar.
sore loser for sure, rather than own up to the false narrative she made, she is still trying to find excuses and avoid accountability...the world already saw she is a manipulator, quit with the games
I’m glad that the juror spoke out, especially since Amber and her legal team have been saying that the jury was “influenced” by social media and that the verdict wasn’t fair, blatantly calling the jury incompetent
The juror shouldn’t have spoken out so soon or should have been more cautious. It’s giving Amber ammunition for an appeal. The jury instructions were clear that if they found Johnny to be abusive in one instance, they must find Heard innocent. This juror speaking out and saying they were both abusive is contradictory.
@@fkillah relax. One juror can think that all they want but it has to be unanimous. Even if he believes both were abusers he didnt believe it enough to stall the verdict.
Don't believe it. This is suspiciously identical to what the TikTok fraudster had made up, and ABC and other mainstream media has jumped the gun and aired things which aren't exactly true or perfectly vetted and verified either.
It was completely fake, her stories definitely did not add up, she contradicted herself numerous amount of times and her stories kept growing and she takes zero responsibility
How can I pray for you today, specifically? You were highlighted to me! We are meant to help one another And life is hard so I wanted to encourage you today that having a prayer life can make life more simpler for you. God wants You to solely depend on Him for everything you want and need. Did you ever come to know Jesus as your Lord and Savior? I feel like He is truly knocking on your heart today🕊🙏😊
I’m SURPRISED that the juror didn’t straight up say that hearing Amber say that the op-ed WAS about JD on at least 3 occasions was enough for them. At one point, she admitted her concern about getting sued over writing the op-ed ABOUT JD. That alone… should have won his case.
I'm very impressed with the jury: They noticed the hysterics one minute then stone cold answers the next; the staring that freaked them out; the donations that stayed in her bank account; the fact that they were both unkind to each other but that Depp didn't strike her. Amber Heard just will not accept the fact that she's just not believable. Like a real psycho, she'll just go on to harass Mr.Depp because she'll equate that with still being with him...scary.
I'm impressed some ppl still say they both were abusive to each other. Why JD? For screaming at her? For holding her down when she was the one hitting him? I've seen with my own eyes couples going at it way harder than that, not physical but my god have those words scarred my mind to this date, and still they're together. Because it's a strong marriage. This was a weak marriage because of AH being a psycho.
The jury did not base their decision solely on nuance and "little things." There was a lot of evidence: photos, recordings, medical records, witness and expert statements and testimony.
Yes. This juror made it clear that while their judgment was based on the evidence, they also paid attention to the demeanor of both Johnny and Amber. That's exactly what a juror is supposed to do -- use all clues to evaluate whether or not they think a witness is being honest.
Nuances and Little Things CAN be evidence, like the crocodile tears being a Prime Example. That is NOT pure victim behavior of someone who was physically abused and other stuff. Of someone who did no wrong. I know people who went through severe abuse and they NEVER acted like Amber did
Elaine and Rottenborn had no control over her. Especially Elaine. She allowed Amber to talk and talk. Henceforth, it was a train wreck. Lawyers usually tell their clients to be precise and concise. If she needs to descibe an abuse, she can do it in about 6 to 8 sentences. Amber was overexplaining, everything was over. The embellishments, dear God, most had no meaning like the "Johnny convinced the world that he had scissors for fingers" Ludicrous. Savannah should have asked her what she means by "Johnny convinced ....................scissors for fingers". Can you explain? This woman has completely lost her marbles!
@@TheAyanamiRei Exactly! When u are a victim of abuse, u don't taunt, tease, make fun of, chase after and degrade your abuser. U are petrified of setting them off. The person who is the victim, runs and hides and their abuser chases after them and bangs on the door and shouts and carries on. Who was hiding and who was banging on the door? She really looks stupid trying to appeal this. Does she want to embarrass herself again ? I'm going to call it, she suddenly found other pics of her with bruises and black eyes, medical records are mysteriously found in the doctor's files, she takes the correct PTSD test with her doctor to (try) claim the correct test showed PTSD. She got some acting lessons to help her with crying bc we all saw her fake, no tears cry...or perhaps she will put something in her tissue this time that will make her tear. I don't see how she thinks she can appeal this unless she suddenly comes up with new lies. What would possibly change the verdict? 🤦🏻♀️🙄
You know the juror didn’t actually say they were both abusive to each other..he said they had their husband and wife arguments which neither of them are right or wrong..why GMA can’t you just report how the interview actually was! Edit * either Also he was way more detailed..
I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive/aggressive to each other. She was the aggressor! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...
@@terriyaadams the Umbrella Guy always say the truth he back checks is Information about is story he us fare from being the biggest Depp supporters platform 👍
I love how this jury commented that her lawyers did not make a good impression on them. I hope Elaine hears this because all she’s been doing is blaming everyone except AH and herself.
I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive to each other. She is the abusive one! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...
@@joannebutcher860 did you not see her IGNORE Amber at the end? No adoration there!! I don’t think Ellen even believed Amber - just wanted the five minutes of fame. She must have coached Amber to do that creepy answer to jury think. Did her about as much good as that ghastly gurning Psychiatrist.
We would like to see the full context of what the juror actually said because they never said that they both abused each other did they now? And it's disingenuous to imply that they did...they said they had their husband and wife arguments but that neither was really seen as wrong for the verbal, texts while Heard was seen by the majority as aggressive and that none of them felt Depp had ever been physical with her.
Damn. So glad one of them spoke out. After Friday her interview will be released, I hope more of them speak out anonymously. Her dateline interview mocked the justice system and literally insulted the jury. Good for him for speaking up and speaking out. Thank you!!! 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏
What she is doing is exactly what a borderline psychopathic narcissist does... all the time. That's how you can tell what she is. Trust me, I've been in Johnny's place. Got PTSD and still in therapy 10+ yrs out. These people are straight from the devil himself. This will affect Johnny for the rest of his life. After surviving them, you are forever changed, scarred, deep emotional scars. A psychological wounding. Mine stalked me for 3 1/2 yrs straight and still does intermittently to this day. They become obsessed with you. They're like herpes. They never go away. Amber is already doing it now, saying she's still in love with him and with this interview of hers. Just like 'someone' else that can't stop obsessing about being 'wronged'.
Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤
God heals depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, EVERYTHING, God literally heals my physical pain when I ask Him! Trust in God to heal ALL! He is your creator! Lean not on man, you'll never be healed. Know that there is power in the name Jesus Christ! His name casts out demons and heals! People are bothered by his name, for the world hates the truth and wants to continue living sinfully!!
@@Call_Upon_YAH Jesus, doesn't just heal your depression, anxiety, or whatever just like that. that's not realistic. I have believed in God for most of my life and he 1. has not healed my depression (I have asked him to). 2. He sure as HELL doesn't heal your anxiety (I've asked that one too) and 3. that might work for you baby boo, but, don't tell everyone else that. Jesus picks and chooses who he wants to help. That's all and that's final. God Bless and have a good day! And, before you ream me and say I am not a true Christian for believing that he can heal with a snap of his fingers. 1. I am a true Christian and 2. don't try to use the No True Scotsman Fallacy with me. Because I ain't having it!
THANK YOU, Anonymous Juror and ALL the jurors!!!! All of us who watched this trial along with you and drew the same conclusions as you appreciate so much that you got it right! And your sacrifice is recognized! I watched this trial on 1.75 speed on RUclips from my couch, with snack breaks, life breaks, and "I can't deal with anymore of this insanity right now!" breaks whenever I wanted. But you guys not only missed work and pay for a month and a half (!!!!!), you had to listen to the whole sordid spectacle in person, day after day for weeks on end. You are CHAMPIONS!!!!!! THANK YOU for your service!!!!!
@@BG-hz8fh At first I thought you were talking about the juror and I got defensive! Phew! Yes, comments like that "legal expert's" just make it seem like 1) they didn't actually watch the trial, and 2) hitting their pre-planned talking points is more important to them than the truth. The truth is the REAL victim of abuse in this case just finally got his name cleared in a court of law thanks to these long-suffering jurors who actually listened to the facts and made reasonable inferences about the credibility of the witnesses. THANK GOD FOR GOOD JURORS!
Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤
God heals depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, EVERYTHING, God literally heals my physical pain when I ask Him! Trust in God to heal ALL! He is your creator! Lean not on man, you'll never be healed. Know that there is power in the name Jesus Christ! His name casts out demons and heals! People are bothered by his name, for the world hates the truth and wants to continue living sinfully!!
I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive/aggressive to each other. She was the aggressor! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...
Shame on you GMA for lying and misrepresenting the Juror and what he said!!! I would suggest everyone read what the Juror actually said, She was the aggressor and flat out did not before her, like the rest of the world!!!
"how could they not?" she's a narcissist so she can't imagine a world where someone isn't obsessed with followers and broadcasting pics of their breakfast. She can't even fathom not immediately looking at your phone every 2 seconds to see if anyone like your post or if you have new followers. The reality is there are tons of people that are pretty much unplugged and could easily not look at social media for 2 months! For me personally, I only need it to communicate with some friends and family but I wouldn't care if I never went on tiktok
What the jury saw was a fake woman crying fake and telling private things about marriage, to win something that a poor guy in 30 years of career has never been accused of 😥.
Disappointed how the jurer actual statement was cut down and completely misrepresent what they were saying....... Some instances you actually lie..... Shame on you
Get help . Come out and say she has borderline personality disorder . Open up about the abuse from her father , and cult like upbringing. And say she may have gotten abusive , apologize . Own it.apologize profusely . She might have a slight future . But this is horrifyingly narcissist
I’m glad they pointed out how she was CONSTANTLY looking at them 😂I always found that annoying and weird when she was there. I guess it was a tactic she attempted but backfired lol
NotMe2day0 seconds ago I also like how the jurorist pointed how how she could be so upset and 2 seconds later ice cold. FYI- PTSD does not work like that.
I read that amber's team asked to seal the jury names so no one could interview them to offset her lies. Good for this person for speaking out and defending the jurors
She’s going to end up being re-litigated by Depp’s team filing a motion for permanent injunction (they won’t sue again, it doesn’t need to go that route, but filing a injunction would be much better) by the courts if Depp’s team gets fed up enough with these lies and the way she keeps belittling the judge and jury by acting as if she didn’t have a fair trial and that they all lied/were against her going by the narratives she is setting out (ie: “they looked on social media, the gallery was full of fanatical Depp fans, etc.” to imply the Judge didn’t have a control of her court). All this gaslighting she’s trying to do can easily come back and bite her in the ass if she doesn’t watch, because she can easily be ordered by the court now to cease talking about it (which CAN result in criminal charges if she continues if they file an injunction because she’ll have been told by a court of law to stop talking about any of it since she continues to defame). Amber thinks just because she went through the trial and it is now “over” she believes she can just blatantly lie about everyone involved. Judgement-proof as they say. Depp’s team can easily take that interview she did and said “See? This is potential for republishing. She won’t stop. Even when she was proven in a court of law to have defamed our client, she still continues to defame him with even more lies. She’s now trying to lay blame on the jury by claiming they saw social media and didn’t care about the oath.” It’s obvious she’s setting everything up to appeal, but this can easily backfire right in her face.
In some countries when you're on the stand and the lawyers are questioning you. Your response has to be towards the judge. But I did have a giggle or two when she was answering while looking at the jury as if they were having coffee with her at a cafe lmaooo
Please read the article if you haven’t already…the media kept out very important information and also spun the truth…aka…blatantly lied about the jurors actual statements…took things way out of context during the video they shared with the world. If you’d like to see an honest and thorough breakdown of the article head on over to That Umbrella Guys Channel 💯
@@Juliette_4 She was doing it too much. Otherwise they wouldn’t have been made uncomfortable. She gave off the impression that she was trying to sell it to the jury. It looked to forced. Nothing about her testimony came off as looking natural. I’ve never seen anyone direct all the answers to the jury as if ignoring the lawyer. Even Camille Vasquez once asked her to direct her answers to her. It came off looking worse for her as if she was almost intimidated by Camille Vasquez not a good look for someone who is trying to prove there innocence.
It'd be nice if you stated , EXACTLY what the juror said about the knife and how they didn't find Amber credible If anyone wants to know the unvarnished truth go to the umbrella guy. He'll actually report the news without a slant smh
Everyone lied but Amber. Everyone is willing to risk perjury or breaking the court rules just because of Depp....... Amber..... I don't think everyone is as obsessed with Depp as you are.
Thank you for speaking out . The jury saw exactly what we all saw at the court : Lies, inconsistencies, contradicting testimonies, fake terrible acting , recordings, and solid evidence that proves she is guilty.
@@BG-hz8fh i did noticed that too they didn't refer to Johnny being fully innocent rather than saying he is more reliable cause the jury seems to consider them both guilty somehow and that's what I can't accept but the least to be thankful for that they saw AH being fake and dishonest even though she is still publickly defended unfortunately by delusionals.... may be more measures needs to be taken by Johnny team for any further defamation...
@@BG-hz8fh There was more to what he said than what GMA is reporting on here. For instance, I don’t think he ever actually mentioned “mutual abuse”. What he said was that husbands and wives get into arguments and yell at each other. GMA just put their spin on it. That was their take on it, or they left out the husband and wife statement, so it’s out of context. Seems their spin is trying to make it sound like the jury came down with their verdict just because they thought she wasn’t credible due to her bad coaching, and actions on the stand. I highly doubt that those are the sole reasons all seven jurors found for JD. Wonder what else they left out or reported out of context. It will be interesting to see what The jury will say in the future.
@@allimoo-249 Even if they did mention they were both abusive, it still won't change the verdict at all. Because, the jury was not given jury instructions defining abuse or what type of abuse they must believe. Rotternborn tried to pigeonhole them into HIS wide definition of abuse. Whereas Camille said that the jury should determine her claims in context the op-ed born from her claims in the TRO where she accused him of *PHYSICAL* abuse. It's clear that the jury used Camille's definition she presented to them in her rebutal closings and they all agreed that Amber's statement which alluded to physical abuse since that is what she *publically* accused Johnny Depp of in her TRO which was made public was false. The jury can believe which ever lawyer's definition of abuse in that context is since there are no jury instructions stating otherwise. If the jury had to believe only Rotternborn's definition of abuse then when Amber and her team attempted to dismiss Johnny's case mid-trial, it would have been successful but the judge denied it and left it up to the jury to decide what lawyer's definition of abuse they choose to believe. I hope I didn't confuse y'all even more, but look at Camille's rebutal closing argument to further understand
Johnny Depp was pushed to his limit and reacted by using foul language. But I don’t believe that he abused her. JD abused himself by using drugs and alcohol and staying in a toxic relationship as long as he did.
@@aaronelijahcolyer it's fake dude.. tmz, ABC, CNN all have articles about what's her plan after this movie and they talked about future roles in more DC films
@@Foxhound94 the article I read was from a credible source and if they don't take her out i won't be watching the film as will a lot of others so they better remove her if they don't want the movie to flop
She was so disrespectful to the jury in her interview assuming that they were "influenced by social media". Jurors take their oaths seriously, they can potentially be fined if they don't follow the court's rules. This is clearly something Amber Heard does not understand. She thinks they must have "cheated" cause she was the one doing that the entire trial. Amber, not everyone is a manipulative liar like you...
On Amber's sick mind, all jurors started a whatsapp group as "Defamation Trial Friends", and they sent all funny Tiktok videos to each other during the court. She's really delusional.
Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him! Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants! Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤
Did nobody get what the problem is still? The problem is that you can get ppl blindly believing accusations, with no real evidence. We should listen but never just believe. It was my problem from the get go with metoo, and how it was turned heavily against one gender too. I want it to be safe for both genders to come forward but metoo went too far.
100%. Metoo is a toxic movement that needs to end. It's unacceptable for them to reverse the burden of proof and turn it into "a man is always guilty until he can prove otherwise in a court of law".
@@lostwoods5687 Allegedly, never proved. And YES..... I watched the trial. Depp admitted on tape that he headbutted her. That was more than enough to prove that he did abuse her, no matter if she abused him or not. That was not what the libel was about. The jury clearly didn't get the assigment right.
Great to hear from the jury. The juror said exactly what we were thinking and saying all thd time. This is a lesson for everybody:" don't lie in court"
The jurors should sue her and her lawyers for accusing them of being influenced by social media. If I was a juror and truly made an effort to avoid the news as best as I could I'd be livid.
Nah, I don't think they really have grounds to sue for that. But Johnny could very easily take her back to court for defamation AGAIN - she literally posted a defamatory tweet 10 minutes after she got out of court.
@@Carts45 i dont even know what youre saying. First of all i hate metoo and never supported it. Second, the woman was just globally humiliated. Everyone hates her. Her career is ruined. No one believes a word she says. Juat because she tweets some nonsense and someone gets their little feelings hurt doesnt mean we have to throw people into the ring AGAIN. People need to know whatbto take a win, or lose, and move on without trying to get money from every single little upset they have.
The whole jury should sue her and her lawyer for saying that they were on social media and they were influenced by him because he is a famous actor,which are all lies
The jury had to witness this trial in person! I can't even imagine them wanting to get on social media and repeat their day? Is ludicrous!! I thank ABC for speaking the truth through this. As an ex-abused woman many years ago, I could never believe AH!! She showed no true ptsd, or symptoms of abuse. I am so happy for all abused people that truth actually overcame lies!!👍👍👏👏🙏🙏💯💯
After long days of hearing testimony, is it really a surprise jury members resisted the temptation to consult social media about the case in their personal time at home? I sat on a jury for a 2-week civil case and was desperate to talk to people about anything other than the case.
I totally agree. My abusive ex also started to throw liquid in my face, just like AH did to JD. I used to run away and try to hide in the bathroom/bedroom anywhere just to get away from him, just like JD did
I wish the juror would of spoken to someone outside of the mainstream media! They continue to twist things to their narrative. They misrepresented what the juror said and completely left out a vast majority of important talking points! I suggest everyone read the print version of the story to see what the juror actually said. Of course, I'm sure that doesn't include everything..... Because why on earth would the media want to be transparent right? If you want just a quick overview of some of the main talking points, I'd suggest checking out That Umbrella guys video. I'm not some JD superfan. I'm a survivor of narcissistic abuse and I cannot stand how the media continues to downplay Heards abuse. They continue to push the "they were both abusive" narrative. It's sickening, Johnny Depp is a victim of emotional and physical abuse. Amber heard is an abuser. Stop standing up for her and start standing up for the real victim!
I always worried, and prayed to God that the jury would see what we were seeing outside. So delighted to see they did! We always had a reason to support Johnny, and his fame was not it.
For me his fame had nothing to do with it. I switched for Johnny's side when I'we listened like 5hours of their recordings. I was shocked how AH treated him. It was clear to me she was not the victim here
Why use a prayer for this??? why do you think your God will make time to listen to you, for this??? The jury saw everything. They were in the courtroom. No need for them to go looking anywhere else if they have first hand access.
It wouldn't surprise me she comes out with a comment stating the male juror was just sexist and that he lying about not going to social media,and how as a so called abused victim it hurts her so much that the jurors called her fake tears crocodile tears and blah blah blah
Waiting for her next interview when she claim this juror is PAID by JD . At this point i really hope JD will sue her to shut her up once & for all .... this woman is beyond repair she needs to be cast aside in jail or therapy center
She will come out with a comment stating the male juror is sexist and how dare the jury said her tears were crocodile tears,and how distraught she is for claiming she was not telling the truth,and she will keep calling them liars
@@bonniehowell9206She is sick she accuses anyone of something that they're not plus remember how she accused johnny of being racist while she was on the stand,she just kept throwing out so many lies and being dramatic after dramatic she thought people would believe her about the fake racism claim
To be honest, I think it was her 'evidences' that actually backfired on her and did her more damage than Johnny. Whatever pictures she had of her injuries, she made them suspicious by her embellished, over the top description of whatever assault incident caused them. For the most serious and egregious assault claims, she had no photos or medical evidence and she testified herself that she 'didn't feel the need to'. So she felt the need to document less severe injuries, but didn't feel the need to neither document or seek medical help for serious injuries?? She recorded so much of audio tapes, but not only none of it had anything to incriminate Johnny, instead she was the one losing control and being toxic even when she was in control of the recording. She couldn't make the jury believe her, because she has absolutely no self awareness about her own behavior. Including how much obnoxious she came across as when she was questioned about the donations...that single cross examination was enough to clearly show that she is someone who does not conced even an inch and we all know how that behaviour plays it in relationships. Johnny lawyer was ecstatic after that exactly because of that...she showed exactly who she was at that moment
The most disgusting thing about this entire situation is how corporate political propaganda gleefully sold Amber's narrative for years and actively participated in destroying Depp's reputation and career. Years ago when the entire "journalistic" community began selling the narrative en mass I instinctively knew it had to be a lie. Imagine just how many people who still trust corporate media believed their lies for years
The Juror hit the nail on the head! His comments are what we ALL felt based on what was presented in court! Amber Heard goes on and on about social media and ''it's influence'' but let's be fair, the MAJORITY of what did the rounds on social media were HER recordings and what was presented in court! She needs to move on and get on with her life, justice was fairly served.
@@blossominglotus2348 I have and I did. I watched the full trial and I read what the juror actually said. It’s sickening that MSM is still trying to spin this in Heard’s favor when Johnny was so clearly victimized for YEARS.
I’m so happy that a jury member came forward! The world needed to hear this because Amber & her lawyers are trashing them like THEY MADE THE WRONG DECISION!
To be fair, Casey Anthony case was obvious on its face, but that poor babies body hadn't been found for so long it was impossible to prescribe a Murder 1 charge. You just can't make it fit. Yes, the means was homicide, but the method being unknown absolutely killed that case. There has to be evidence. OJ on the other hand...I just don't have any reasons for that one.
I dunno man. You're not supposed to be interperating 'body language' as a juror. The juror claims he wasn't influenced by the massive pro-Depp campaign but hopped immediately onto tiktok to talk about the verdict!? Yah roooight!
2:58 That’s a wise juror. I’ve been saying this from day 1, I’m sure Johnny isn’t perfect and they were “abusive” to each other. However, abusive doesn’t necessarily mean physical abuse like the way AH pretended to describe. Calling each other names, insulting each other are all forms of abuse that’s pretty common in a lot of families including mine. AH is just a drama queen.
The thing is there’s no sign of abuse from Depp, retaliating in defence verbally when you’re being abused by someone is very common but I don’t count that in itself as abusive.
@@linzi94 I also have a hard time accepting those things as abuse. I think we have all said things in the heat of a moment that we might later regret and that might be construed as abusive. Does that make everyone an abuser? I don't think so. And things you say to your friends in private text are not abusive to the person you're talking about. Geez the things you say when venting to a close confident are always hyperbole. No, I don't actually wish my ex would get shoved off a cliff. Its just things you say.
I agree with the comments above. Initially, I thought there was mutual abuse, but the more audio I heard of her mocking him, admitting to hitting him, admitting to not giving him space or allowing him to get away when she was being aggressive, the more I realized he was pushed to his very limit and actually exhibited more self control than most people would in those situations. It was not mutual abuse, it was a knee-jerk reaction to consistent and overbearing abuse from AH. Johnny is innocent.
Why have you lied by omission and by changing what the jurors actually said? He did NOT say they were both ‘abusive’ to each other.” Abusive” is your (GMA) word. The juror said “husband & wife argument.” You misrepresented his words.
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
Glad someone from the jury is speaking out. Her attacking they jury’s character saying they must have seen something on social media is so disrespectful. They gave up 6 weeks or their lives for your trial. To go on this campaign of blaming them would just make me think I made the right decision.
She claims that she "doesn't blame them" and yet says that they were on social media and being influenced by outside sources. That's blaming the jury, she just doesn't want to look bad.
WHEN HE SAID HE BELIEVED THEY WERE BOTH "ABUSIVE TO EACHOTHER", HE LATER WENT ON TO SAY THAT HE MEANT THEY HAD NORMAL "HUSBAND- WIFE ARGUMENTS." NOT SURE WHY GMA WOULD LEAVE THAT PART OUT BUT Y'ALL CAN READ IT ON ROLLING STONE'S ARTICLE. THE JURY ALSO SAID MORE STUFF ON WHY THEY DID NOT BELIEVE HER.
@@gigi6997 You are so right, and I will never look at that coverage again! It makes me angry just to think about it! Even now I am utterly disgusted with George S. and his "bothsides" BS. Pending assault charge? Really? A two-minute review shows that case is nothing burger they're just throwing in to look "balanced." Depp WON a DEFAMATION case!! Let the man have his victory lap!!!
Thank you for posting the context for the abuse comment! I smelled a rat in the way they covered it given all the other comments by the juror. Re: not sure why GMA would leave that part out, it's standard media BS. Fan the flames of controversy to get more views, and maybe to try to look less foolish for being SO BIASED against Depp in previous coverage. SO GLAD the jury got it right!!!!!! : - )
No ABC said that the juror said they were abusive to each other - the juror never said that. The statement given to them by the juror is their words - ABC lied about what the juror said for sensationalism
Everyone who watched the trial knew this already. I thought Johnny was losing a bit until Amber took the stand. The pledge comments were the final nail. It just reminded me of every pathological liar who would stone face lie about something that we can both see, and can both see that there's no confusion between us what we're seeing. The audio recordings were the kill shots.
the thing is, there are "con artist liars" that you really believe what they say, but then there are liars that you can see straight through their lying teeth..she is the 2nd one
Swampfox taylor It was painfully obvious with the sound on and not watching Amber Heard while she was talking too! I tend to be an overly empathetic person, yet I'm perceptive as well, hence why I found it difficult to listen to her for long, especially in regard to her graphic descriptions of what didn't really happen. 😡
The juror confirming what we all suspected, it was Amber's own testimony that sank her case. Turns out staring and crying without tears makes you look unbelievable. I would love to hear what went through the juror's minds when Dr Hughes and Dr Spiegel were testifying. Those 'expert' witnesses were ...something.
That crying without tears is one of the things that sealed the deal for me. There is no one type of abuse victim and not all cry, that wouldn't make me doubt them. People have different reactions to recalling their abuse and facing their abuser. What looks incredibly suspicious is fake crying, trying to look a certain way. Fake crying is a type of lie in itself.
My sister broke her nose when she got a nosejob, and it took her weeks for the dark bruising to dimish and months for the swelling to diminish. There is no way she could cover anything with makeup, at least not for several weeks.
Juror’s actual statement portion they butchered: For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
@Johnny Depp Content intended to impersonate a person or channel is not allowed on RUclips. RUclips also enforces trademark holder rights. When a channel, or content in the channel, causes confusion about the source of goods and services advertised, it may not be allowed. RUclips may terminate your channel or account for repeated violations of the Community Guidelines or Terms of Service. RUclips may also terminate your channel or account after a single case of severe abuse, or when the channel is dedicated to a policy violation.
Well done Juror, they are smart and don't fall for BS. Now someone from social media pls come out and speak on MY behalf that I too was no Johnny or Jack Sparrow fan but that watching AMBER TESTIFY lost her case for me. I just didnt believe her!
For those of you wondering if this *"abusive to eachother"* line, would help Amber's appeal, no it will not at all. Here's why. The jury was not given jury instructions defining abuse or what type of abuse they must believe. Rotternborn tried to pigeonhole them into HIS wide definition of abuse. Whereas Camille said that the jury should determine her claims in context the op-ed born from her claims in the TRO where she publically accused him of *PHYSICAL* abuse. It's clear that the jury used Camille's definition she presented to them in her rebutal closings and they all agreed that Amber's statement which alluded to physical abuse since that is what she *publically* accused Johnny Depp of in her TRO which was made public was false. The jury can believe which ever lawyer's definition of abuse in that context is since there are no jury instructions stating otherwise. If the jury had to believe only Rotternborn's definition of abuse then when Amber and her team attempted to dismiss Johnny's case mid-trial, it would have been successful but the judge denied it and left it up to the jury to decide what lawyer's definition of abuse they choose to believe. I hope I didn't confuse y'all even more, but look at Camille's rebutal closing argument to further understand
Actually the Juror never said that they were abusive to eachother, he said they were Yelling at eachother. THe reporter switche the word yelling for abuse, This people are rats.
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
Aside from mentioning the bogus assault case pending against Depp. Sigh. Witnesses to the supposed "fight" have already said Depp did nothing wrong, but they just can't let him have an untainted moment of victory. But yes--this was a HUGE step in the right direction!
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
I don't agree that they were both abusive to each other. There is only one guilty party in this, the person who brought false allegations (with zero actual evidence) and destroyed a person's life and career for six years.
Yup It was clearly a toxic relationship on both sides only Amber Heard was vindictive and wanted to take down her ex and not own up to her actions. She needs help.
In the full article, it's more detailed and says: The jury concluded "they were both abusive to each other" but Heard’s team failed to prove Depp’s abuse was physical."
I believe Johnny never hit her, but I could see him being verbally abusive, but the door absolutely swings both ways. If you're with a person as frustrating as Amber how could you not lash out? It's either leave her or start screaming.
Yeah, I highly disagree with both being abusive, it was clearly her who instigated the escalation of arguments and violence, I feel like saying they were both abusive towards each other is just a people pleasing answer to not have to enter into any arguments.
I listened to that man talk for two minutes about “how much they focused on her nuances” and “being disliked can make all the difference” … I would be exaggerating if I said it made my stomach turn but you see how it made me feel. I just wish one of these people would worry more about the truth than about their screen time on a major network & a paycheck. The truth of this case is that woman threatened him a week before she claimed he hit her and he lost everything immediately. The truth is that a jury found that he hadn’t hit her a single time in his life. The truth is that she admitted on audio submitted in court that she hit him and she couldn’t promise she won’t do it again. The truth is she physically abused that man and you are all dancing around it because she’s small and pretty and a woman. The truth is Johnny Depp didn’t get a trial before he was blacklisted immediately. I wish you people would talk about the truth more often than dancing around it. She lied and none of you are punishing her for it even after *the law* punished her. He was mean to her so its okay for her to hit him? She’s small so it’s okay for her to punch slap and scratch you when she’s angry? Look at the message you’re sending to actual victims of domestic abuse. It’s disgusting. There’s a reason why random ass lawyers with cameras at home are getting more views and engagement than these multimillion dollar news studios. Look at how you all cover the news. Ridiculous.
He wasn't even mean to her until she chipped away at him with her shrill insults and degradation. I don't even watch MSM much anymore. I'd rather watch someone with real life experience and knowledge put in their real opinion and expertise. MSM has some strong censorship in the name of "political incorrectness."
That assault case JD was sued for was bogus as well- it was staged from AH team- they had video showing JD never touched him- that's Y the dude settled out - he was scared of looking like a fool & Liar - like AH did
GMA... Why did you leave out what this juror actually said? Why are you trying to change this juror words to paint a better picture of this so called POS AH ?
She keeps defaming him though ! In her interview she says she stands by every word she said. In other word, that she WAS indeed abused... What's that about ???
GMA! Please go into detail about "abusive towards each other". What the juror actually said was that "they had their husband/wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other..." If that is a crime, all marriages and relationships would be a crime. 😆
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
She was trying to connect with them but it backfired because she was very obviously lying and trying to manipulate. Which is even more off putting than not looking at them at all .
During sidebars. She stared at them too. Its weird. I would understand that if she was testifying and looking at them but still staring during sidebars? Incredibly weird!
I still find it fascinating that they'd say "They were abusive to each other." Johnny clearly never abused her. He reacted as she attacked and provoked him. They still blame the man on some level.
The juror did say they were abusive to each other but said he did not believe Johnny hit her. It's in the clip. I assume he meant Johnny was verbally abusive to her.
Literally. There cannot be two abusers. Especially in a heterosexual relationship. A woman whose being beaten doesn’t stand a chance a against a man. Do you think a fragile skinny pretty lady is matching blows with an older dude. Evidence clearly showed she was an abuser and johnny tried his hardest to escape it and avoid it. Inner frustration is bound to be released by mean words. Thats normal.
If 2 people in a relationship are constantly arguing with one another, saying the meanest things in the moment are they abusing each other. Does it also follow that they are both victims of domestic abuse and perpetrators of DA. The word abuse is being conflated unhelpfully and using the word for being nasty to one another is not best for evaluating DA.
@@sanjx4300 yea true. Not only that, but apparently sending a text to your friend also constitutes DV against her. The scope of that definition is way too wide for some people.
@@jeanespinal2041 I believe everyone has used abusive language to someone, but what she accused JD of doing I believe she was taking what she did him and putting it on JD . I find it appalling what Elaine and AH have done after the trial . I believe Elaine should be disbarred for her wanting 15 minutes of fame. Elaine sounds a lot like AH , put what you’re doing an apply it to the witnesses. Every chance she got she told JD’S witnesses, you wanted to be on national tv . The whole time it was Elaine who couldn’t resist to be on national tv.
There we go. Looking at the jury at every answer, the changes of emotions and the contradicting statements was what everyone was thinking. It wasnt believable the moment she was put on the stand
Good job, jury! But even if she had been a better actor, looked at the jury less and her lawyer had been more amiable, how could any jury have ignored those incredibly agressive, threatening audios or the fact that her "mountain of evidence" was not even a hill.
Yes. The juror really should have said that she was convicted because of the recordings and all the evidence and not cause she seemed off and did not sound credible on the stand. That diminishes the verdict. And he should definitely not have said that they both were abusive to each other. Like wtf. According to the verdict, Johnny was falsely accused of abuse and defamed.
@@riase The juror did say (just not in so many words) that the evidence didn't support Amber's claims. He said her stories didn't add up and that the evidence didn't match what she claimed happened. So, there's nothing here for Amber's team to pounce on.
For all those who watched the trial, we know:
- she perjured herself on the stand
- she admitted the article was about Depp
- she falsified evidence, ie providing the same pictures for different alleged assaults
- she staged pictures of his drug use
- she took photographs of everything BUT her injuries
- she failed to provide any medical records
- she changed her abuse timeline midway through the trial to the very beginning of the relationship (yet she gave him a big knife early on)
- she refused and failed to submit her phone and devices for discovery
- she says the police, the park manager, everyone who wasn’t her witness were liars
- she uses pledge and donate synonymously
- Kate Moss was not pushed down the stairs as she claimed
- evidence showed on and after her days of alleged abuse, she was flawless and enjoying life. Most humans would likely be at the hospital or recovering from such alleged injuries
Almost forgot all the audio tapes…
where she admitted she abused Depp, taunted him that no one will believe he is a DV victim, gaslighted him saying she didn’t punch but hit him, was constantly chasing him during fights when he wanted to leave to avoid escalating the situation, was under the influence despite her claims of not using anything…..
The list goes on… and on…
Forgot her physical abuse severed his finger…
And she was definitely not afraid of her alleged abuser, ie took pictures sent to friends and mocked him.
Feel free to add to the list if there’s anything else missing.
Exactly.
Excellent outline! Thanks 😊
Precisely
And most of the main stream media kept quiet about all this and supported her instead. It’s a disgrace.
Excellent run down of the evidence! Well done!
Yes the jury had to defend themselves against amber, she’s been speaking like they’re naive and unethical. They weren’t unethical. They sacrificed 6 weeks of their lives and just didn’t believe ambers stories or split second emotion changes.
@@davec3901 that hasn't been verified as a real juror or not, how do you know that its not a fake account?
This makes Elaine and the rest of that law firm look awful too.
@@davec3901 That's not verified. This is.
It’s been revealed that was not a real juror, the tik tok account you’re referring to. This is however a real juror. It’s been verified by abc.
@@davec3901 are you so dumb..that was a fake person!
The juror didn’t actually say “they both abused each other” stop twisting their words to make Amber look less guilty. Wth is wrong with you guys, why are you so adamant about defending this abuser. That being said I’m glad the juror spoke out, just wish it was to a more credible source so their words wouldn’t get twisted.
Correct, just to tarnish JD's name, they twisted the word from the juror
What was is that the juror said? Because that small statement struck me as totally out there. It really seemed like JD was just trying to cope with her abuse, more than anything. If the abuse had gone both ways, we absolutely would have seen it in court.
The jurors should not speak out to the major media anymore. They need to speak out to Darth News or the Umbrella Guy. The major media is not allowing the truth.
Because the media HAS to side on the Me Too side.......no matter what!
Remember, ABC is owned by Disney.
The dots aren't hard to connect.
Jesus this juror absolutely destroyed amber lmao "all of us were very uncomfortable", " crocodile tears ", glad to see people didn't fell for her lies and fake crying on the stand
If you watched all of her testimony - that all tracks. My guess is that she believes her own lies and has a hard time understanding why others don’t. Sobriety and therapy will fix him. Not sure what can fix her. The jury got it right.
Agreed. End of conversation I think.
That means the rumors from people who were apparently inside the courtroom in the audience was true. They didn't want to make eye contact with her and loved Camille.
@@Cassandra-..- She has a serious personality disorder or many of them. There is no cure for that and a person can only be helped if they will admit it. Having narcissistic personality disorder precludes her from even admitting that there is anything wrong with her or that she is ever wrong about anything. She'll always insist that she was right and that this was all because JD is paying off everyone. It's too bad that he had to hook up with someone like her. He certainly did nothing to deserve this. Things will only get better for him from this point on. He deserves to have the truth about what happened known and how she managed to destroy his career but he can and will make a comeback. More people than ever are on his side now.
@@Cassandra-..- you’d think if she actually believed herself she would be more believable!
It was weird whenever she was asked a question her head would pivot to the jury and would answer to them. I thought it was strange and uncomfortable, and it turns out the jury thought the same.
@Mom Yep! I agree...
she also "cried" while maintaining eye contact with the jury... like who does that
@@sushienjoyer a toddler?
I think her attorneys instructed that because I saw other witnesses on ambers side, like Dr. Hughes, do the same thing.
I think it might be uncommon courtroom etiquette. Same reason why they all stand when the jury walks in and out. At the end of the day, youre appealing to the jury who will decide your fate, so it might be etiquette to address them directly.
Please need to think more critically about these things.
@@TheWorldisQuietHere3 Yeah some of the lawyers on RUclips that covered it mentioned it was most likely suggested to her that she do it. However, the lawyers also need to be aware of what works and what doesn’t. If they see the jury isn’t responding well to the clients consistent eye contact, they need to adjust accordingly. Or perhaps they did, but she didn’t listen/got too adjusted to the habit 🤷🏻♀️
Huh. Here you say "the jury thought they were both the abusers," but I'm looking at a transcript from the interview that says, "They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don't think that makes either of them right or wrong. That's what you do when you get into an argument, I guess."
HUGE difference from "they thought they were both abusers."
ITS been debunked..
@@reidun-engh8824 Not that I've seen. What I HAVE seen is media twisting things and editing her responses to look more favorable. As in, before and after videos.
A lot of media and outlets are owned by the woke. They tell their people how and what to report. Was reading today an article titled "Amber Heard scores huge win over Johnny Depp after trial" and the article proceeded to just talk how she was still in Aquaman 2 even though a lot of fans called for her removal but even though she remained in the movie her scenes were drastically reduced and cut lol.
He’s essentially saying that he was verbally abusive, which his texts proved he was . I only feel he was emotionally and verbally abusive, Not physical .
This juror said everything that I felt during this trial about Amber Heard's behavior...glad they were paying attention
Same here
Poor jurors. I would have gone mad listening to all of that shit while she kept staring.
Even to this day, i mean her last interview... Damn still acting
I felt the same way too! A lawyer asks you a question. You ARE giving your answer to the lawyer! Constantly looking at the jury and giving your answer makes it seem like you are DESPERATE for them to believe whatever you’re saying ESPECIALLY if it’s a LIE!!!! And surely she MUST know that such acting would NOT win over the jury! They are there for the TRUTH, not what you want them to think is the truth🤷♀️
Juror explains mutually abusive comment: "They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying," he said. Link on GMA www.goodmorningamerica.com/culture/story/juror-johnny-depp-amber-heard-defamation-trial-speaks-85432281
This Jury seen the fake BS!
As we all did.
Elaine: “how DARE you. Don’t you know that calling any woman a liar is a setback?” Looool
Thank God!!!
When she broke down crying on the stand, it looked pretty fake and not believable.
Hello, Gorgeous how are you doing today?
hello beautiful lady how are you doing you have a lovely smile can we be friends??☺️☺️
Thank you to the juror for his time and service. I think it's disgraceful that after losing the case, AH is now saying the jury was influenced by social media, something the judge specifically asked the jury to stay away from. AH thinks everyone is like her: an unethical liar.
Hello Kathy how are you doing today.
Good think she’s aware of what we think of her
sore loser for sure, rather than own up to the false narrative she made, she is still trying to find excuses and avoid accountability...the world already saw she is a manipulator, quit with the games
I’m glad that the juror spoke out, especially since Amber and her legal team have been saying that the jury was “influenced” by social media and that the verdict wasn’t fair, blatantly calling the jury incompetent
The juror shouldn’t have spoken out so soon or should have been more cautious. It’s giving Amber ammunition for an appeal. The jury instructions were clear that if they found Johnny to be abusive in one instance, they must find Heard innocent. This juror speaking out and saying they were both abusive is contradictory.
@@fkillah relax. One juror can think that all they want but it has to be unanimous. Even if he believes both were abusers he didnt believe it enough to stall the verdict.
@@fkillah Not really, because the counter claim is really agaisnt johnnys lawyers comments.
Don't believe it. This is suspiciously identical to what the TikTok fraudster had made up, and ABC and other mainstream media has jumped the gun and aired things which aren't exactly true or perfectly vetted and verified either.
@@fkillah ABC is not necessarily representing an honest person who is a real juror, they may be presenting junk just like the TikTok fraud.
It was completely fake, her stories definitely did not add up, she contradicted herself numerous amount of times and her stories kept growing and she takes zero responsibility
*#SI**ruclips.net/video/EdEGPw516mM/видео.htmlесли** порorcoño* 👈
How can I pray for you today, specifically? You were highlighted to me! We are meant to help one another And life is hard so I wanted to encourage you today that having a prayer life can make life more simpler for you. God wants You to solely depend on Him for everything you want and need. Did you ever come to know Jesus as your Lord and Savior? I feel like He is truly knocking on your heart today🕊🙏😊
I’m SURPRISED that the juror didn’t straight up say that hearing Amber say that the op-ed WAS about JD on at least 3 occasions was enough for them.
At one point, she admitted her concern about getting sued over writing the op-ed ABOUT JD. That alone… should have won his case.
I'm very impressed with the jury: They noticed the hysterics one minute then stone cold answers the next; the staring that freaked them out; the donations that stayed in her bank account; the fact that they were both unkind to each other but that Depp didn't strike her. Amber Heard just will not accept the fact that she's just not believable. Like a real psycho, she'll just go on to harass Mr.Depp because she'll equate that with still being with him...scary.
Hello, Duane how are you doing today?
@@craigscott6443 sure you got the right Duane?
@@duaneraymond4252 that’s okay
@@duaneraymond4252 How are you doing today?
I'm impressed some ppl still say they both were abusive to each other. Why JD? For screaming at her? For holding her down when she was the one hitting him?
I've seen with my own eyes couples going at it way harder than that, not physical but my god have those words scarred my mind to this date, and still they're together. Because it's a strong marriage.
This was a weak marriage because of AH being a psycho.
The jury did not base their decision solely on nuance and "little things." There was a lot of evidence: photos, recordings, medical records, witness and expert statements and testimony.
Yes. This juror made it clear that while their judgment was based on the evidence, they also paid attention to the demeanor of both Johnny and Amber. That's exactly what a juror is supposed to do -- use all clues to evaluate whether or not they think a witness is being honest.
@@rowanaforrest9792 Exactly, and they got it right! 👏
Nuances and Little Things CAN be evidence, like the crocodile tears being a Prime Example. That is NOT pure victim behavior of someone who was physically abused and other stuff. Of someone who did no wrong. I know people who went through severe abuse and they NEVER acted like Amber did
Elaine and Rottenborn had no control over her. Especially Elaine. She allowed Amber to talk and talk. Henceforth, it was a train wreck. Lawyers usually tell their clients to be precise and concise. If she needs to descibe an abuse, she can do it in about 6 to 8 sentences. Amber was overexplaining, everything was over. The embellishments, dear God, most had no meaning like the "Johnny convinced the world that he had scissors for fingers" Ludicrous.
Savannah should have asked her what she means by "Johnny convinced ....................scissors for fingers". Can you explain?
This woman has completely lost her marbles!
@@TheAyanamiRei Exactly! When u are a victim of abuse, u don't taunt, tease, make fun of, chase after and degrade your abuser. U are petrified of setting them off. The person who is the victim, runs and hides and their abuser chases after them and bangs on the door and shouts and carries on. Who was hiding and who was banging on the door? She really looks stupid trying to appeal this. Does she want to embarrass herself again ? I'm going to call it, she suddenly found other pics of her with bruises and black eyes, medical records are mysteriously found in the doctor's files, she takes the correct PTSD test with her doctor to (try) claim the correct test showed PTSD. She got some acting lessons to help her with crying bc we all saw her fake, no tears cry...or perhaps she will put something in her tissue this time that will make her tear. I don't see how she thinks she can appeal this unless she suddenly comes up with new lies. What would possibly change the verdict? 🤦🏻♀️🙄
You know the juror didn’t actually say they were both abusive to each other..he said they had their husband and wife arguments which neither of them are right or wrong..why GMA can’t you just report how the interview actually was!
Edit * either
Also he was way more detailed..
I’m so proud of the jurors. Well done!
I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive/aggressive to each other. She was the aggressor! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...
@@terriyaadams the Umbrella Guy always say the truth he back checks is Information about is story he us fare from being the biggest Depp supporters platform 👍
@@BG-hz8fh Indeed, she didn't. CAMILLE VáSQUEZ showed sharp powers of judgment by using AH's own testimony against her.
Well done!
@@evarodriguezalequin5705 I could not have said it better!
I love how this jury commented that her lawyers did not make a good impression on them. I hope Elaine hears this because all she’s been doing is blaming everyone except AH and herself.
I am suspicious that Amber has bewitched Elaine into adoring her and being therefore oblivious of the truth, which we can all clearly see.
@@joannebutcher860
I believe Amber pledged her payment towards Elaine, hence, Elaine was obligated to sing praises towards Amber.
I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive to each other. She is the abusive one! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...
@@joannebutcher860 did you not see her IGNORE Amber at the end? No adoration there!!
I don’t think Ellen even believed Amber - just wanted the five minutes of fame.
She must have coached Amber to do that creepy answer to jury think. Did her about as much good as that ghastly gurning Psychiatrist.
@@raulcitraro Just listening to her taunting made my hand itch.
We would like to see the full context of what the juror actually said because they never said that they both abused each other did they now? And it's disingenuous to imply that they did...they said they had their husband and wife arguments but that neither was really seen as wrong for the verbal, texts while Heard was seen by the majority as aggressive and that none of them felt Depp had ever been physical with her.
Depp should sue!
Damn. So glad one of them spoke out. After Friday her interview will be released, I hope more of them speak out anonymously. Her dateline interview mocked the justice system and literally insulted the jury. Good for him for speaking up and speaking out. Thank you!!! 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏 👏
What she is doing is exactly what a borderline psychopathic narcissist does... all the time. That's how you can tell what she is. Trust me, I've been in Johnny's place. Got PTSD and still in therapy 10+ yrs out.
These people are straight from the devil himself.
This will affect Johnny for the rest of his life.
After surviving them, you are forever changed, scarred, deep emotional scars. A psychological wounding.
Mine stalked me for 3 1/2 yrs straight and still does intermittently to this day. They become obsessed with you.
They're like herpes. They never go away.
Amber is already doing it now, saying she's still in love with him and with this interview of hers.
Just like 'someone' else that can't stop obsessing about being 'wronged'.
Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him!
Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants!
Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤
God heals depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, EVERYTHING, God literally heals my physical pain when I ask Him! Trust in God to heal ALL! He is your creator!
Lean not on man, you'll never be healed.
Know that there is power in the name Jesus Christ! His name casts out demons and heals! People are bothered by his name, for the world hates the truth and wants to continue living sinfully!!
@@nancywutzke5392 .. Spot on 👍👍
@@Call_Upon_YAH Jesus, doesn't just heal your depression, anxiety, or whatever just like that. that's not realistic. I have believed in God for most of my life and he 1. has not healed my depression (I have asked him to). 2. He sure as HELL doesn't heal your anxiety (I've asked that one too) and 3. that might work for you baby boo, but, don't tell everyone else that. Jesus picks and chooses who he wants to help. That's all and that's final.
God Bless and have a good day!
And, before you ream me and say I am not a true Christian for believing that he can heal with a snap of his fingers. 1. I am a true Christian and 2. don't try to use the No True Scotsman Fallacy with me. Because I ain't having it!
THANK YOU, Anonymous Juror and ALL the jurors!!!! All of us who watched this trial along with you and drew the same conclusions as you appreciate so much that you got it right!
And your sacrifice is recognized!
I watched this trial on 1.75 speed on RUclips from my couch, with snack breaks, life breaks, and "I can't deal with anymore of this insanity right now!" breaks whenever I wanted.
But you guys not only missed work and pay for a month and a half (!!!!!), you had to listen to the whole sordid spectacle in person, day after day for weeks on end.
You are CHAMPIONS!!!!!! THANK YOU for your service!!!!!
@@BG-hz8fh At first I thought you were talking about the juror and I got defensive! Phew!
Yes, comments like that "legal expert's" just make it seem like 1) they didn't actually watch the trial, and 2) hitting their pre-planned talking points is more important to them than the truth.
The truth is the REAL victim of abuse in this case just finally got his name cleared in a court of law thanks to these long-suffering jurors who actually listened to the facts and made reasonable inferences about the credibility of the witnesses.
THANK GOD FOR GOOD JURORS!
Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him!
Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants!
Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤
God heals depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts, EVERYTHING, God literally heals my physical pain when I ask Him! Trust in God to heal ALL! He is your creator!
Lean not on man, you'll never be healed.
Know that there is power in the name Jesus Christ! His name casts out demons and heals! People are bothered by his name, for the world hates the truth and wants to continue living sinfully!!
💯💯💯 Also the fact that they had to sit through so many video depos. That would be so exhausting!
I don't agree with one of the jurors who said that they were abusive/aggressive to each other. She was the aggressor! Johnny always tried to get away from the physical confrontation. Being married to an abusive woman, I understand Johhny Depp. I'm not a psychiatrist, but this is what an abusive person's attitude is. They blame everything on the victim, making him/her feel responsible for the undesirable situation. In this particular case, the cross-examination exposed AMBER's lies. Kudos to CAMILLE Vásquez for using AMBER HEARD's testimony against her...
Shame on you GMA for lying and misrepresenting the Juror and what he said!!!
I would suggest everyone read what the Juror actually said, She was the aggressor and flat out did not before her, like the rest of the world!!!
"(Some of) The jurors didn't even use Twitter or Facebook" Amber's blaming social media is, again, baseless and wrong
And they brought it in the court room too lol 😂 all those hashtags 🤦♀️
"how could they not?" she's a narcissist so she can't imagine a world where someone isn't obsessed with followers and broadcasting pics of their breakfast. She can't even fathom not immediately looking at your phone every 2 seconds to see if anyone like your post or if you have new followers. The reality is there are tons of people that are pretty much unplugged and could easily not look at social media for 2 months! For me personally, I only need it to communicate with some friends and family but I wouldn't care if I never went on tiktok
“Others who had it made a point not to talk about it.” Not talking about it and not looking at it are two different things.
Exactly what the world saw during the trial...
What the jury saw was a fake woman crying fake and telling private things about marriage, to win something that a poor guy in 30 years of career has never been accused of 😥.
Disappointed how the jurer actual statement was cut down and completely misrepresent what they were saying....... Some instances you actually lie..... Shame on you
Everytime she opens her mouth she gets into more trouble. She should get herself and her ego away and wait for the storm to pass.
Like forever, with a gag and restraining/no contact order!! Would be a blessing to Johnny, and the world!!
Get help . Come out and say she has borderline personality disorder . Open up about the abuse from her father , and cult like upbringing. And say she may have gotten abusive , apologize . Own it.apologize profusely . She might have a slight future . But this is horrifyingly narcissist
I’m glad they pointed out how she was CONSTANTLY looking at them 😂I always found that annoying and weird when she was there. I guess it was a tactic she attempted but backfired lol
NotMe2day0 seconds ago
I also like how the jurorist pointed how how she could be so upset and 2 seconds later ice cold.
FYI- PTSD does not work like that.
I read that amber's team asked to seal the jury names so no one could interview them to offset her lies. Good for this person for speaking out and defending the jurors
Hello Rosanna how are you doing today.
The jurors will hopefully be protected against AH after 12months. She'll target them to blame someone.
Thank you, juror for coming out and telling us this because Amber Heard is on a rampage and she will not stop and I thank you once again.
She may be doing it thinking that the jurors names will be withheld for a year and can't or won't speak out.
She’s going to end up being re-litigated by Depp’s team filing a motion for permanent injunction (they won’t sue again, it doesn’t need to go that route, but filing a injunction would be much better) by the courts if Depp’s team gets fed up enough with these lies and the way she keeps belittling the judge and jury by acting as if she didn’t have a fair trial and that they all lied/were against her going by the narratives she is setting out (ie: “they looked on social media, the gallery was full of fanatical Depp fans, etc.” to imply the Judge didn’t have a control of her court).
All this gaslighting she’s trying to do can easily come back and bite her in the ass if she doesn’t watch, because she can easily be ordered by the court now to cease talking about it (which CAN result in criminal charges if she continues if they file an injunction because she’ll have been told by a court of law to stop talking about any of it since she continues to defame).
Amber thinks just because she went through the trial and it is now “over” she believes she can just blatantly lie about everyone involved. Judgement-proof as they say.
Depp’s team can easily take that interview she did and said “See? This is potential for republishing. She won’t stop. Even when she was proven in a court of law to have defamed our client, she still continues to defame him with even more lies. She’s now trying to lay blame on the jury by claiming they saw social media and didn’t care about the oath.”
It’s obvious she’s setting everything up to appeal, but this can easily backfire right in her face.
Jury duty is an anonymous gift to democracy, there is no fame or notoriety for this patriot, thank you for your service.
@@ellakajfasz2569 The jurors names are sealed for a year, but they're allowed to reach out to the media on their own accord.
Yes thanks for stating the obvious juror.
She was always responding to the jury like they were asking the questions. And I’m glad they spoke out against all of this.
In some countries when you're on the stand and the lawyers are questioning you. Your response has to be towards the judge.
But I did have a giggle or two when she was answering while looking at the jury as if they were having coffee with her at a cafe lmaooo
I love how they said it made them feel uncomfortable lol. It would have creeped me out too.
your attorneys tell you to look at the jurors
Please read the article if you haven’t already…the media kept out very important information and also spun the truth…aka…blatantly lied about the jurors actual statements…took things way out of context during the video they shared with the world. If you’d like to see an honest and thorough breakdown of the article head on over to That Umbrella Guys Channel 💯
@@Juliette_4 She was doing it too much. Otherwise they wouldn’t have been made uncomfortable. She gave off the impression that she was trying to sell it to the jury. It looked to forced. Nothing about her testimony came off as looking natural. I’ve never seen anyone direct all the answers to the jury as if ignoring the lawyer. Even Camille Vasquez once asked her to direct her answers to her. It came off looking worse for her as if she was almost intimidated by Camille Vasquez not a good look for someone who is trying to prove there innocence.
It'd be nice if you stated , EXACTLY what the juror said about the knife and how they didn't find Amber credible
If anyone wants to know the unvarnished truth go to the umbrella guy. He'll actually report the news without a slant smh
Hello Mary, permit me to know you privately.
Mary I've the umbrella guy " ,Tug",
Love the way this just spoke. I felt the same way
Everyone lied but Amber. Everyone is willing to risk perjury or breaking the court rules just because of Depp....... Amber..... I don't think everyone is as obsessed with Depp as you are.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Hahaha. I’ve watched many trials but never, have I seen such a horrible liar.
😂😂😂😭😭😭💯💯💯🙌🙌🙌
🤣 🤣 🤣 OOh god your on point with that one 😂😂
From the Police to the Jury, everyone is liar but not slAmber Turd...lmao!
Jurors appeared to have reached the same conclusions most of us did, and for the same reasons. Totally fascinating.
Thank you for speaking out . The jury saw exactly what we all saw at the court : Lies, inconsistencies, contradicting testimonies, fake terrible acting , recordings, and solid evidence that proves she is guilty.
@@BG-hz8fh i did noticed that too they didn't refer to Johnny being fully innocent rather than saying he is more reliable cause the jury seems to consider them both guilty somehow and that's what I can't accept but the least to be thankful for that they saw AH being fake and dishonest even though she is still publickly defended unfortunately by delusionals.... may be more measures needs to be taken by Johnny team for any further defamation...
Especially when they showed the knife/dagger she bought Johnny. Why would a fearful victim gift their abuser that?
@@BG-hz8fh There was more to what he said than what GMA is reporting on here. For instance, I don’t think he ever actually mentioned “mutual abuse”. What he said was that husbands and wives get into arguments and yell at each other. GMA just put their spin on it. That was their take on it, or they left out the husband and wife statement, so it’s out of context. Seems their spin is trying to make it sound like the jury came down with their verdict just because they thought she wasn’t credible due to her bad coaching, and actions on the stand. I highly doubt that those are the sole reasons all seven jurors found for JD. Wonder what else they left out or reported out of context. It will be interesting to see what The jury will say in the future.
@@allimoo-249 Even if they did mention they were both abusive, it still won't change the verdict at all. Because, the jury was not given jury instructions defining abuse or what type of abuse they must believe. Rotternborn tried to pigeonhole them into HIS wide definition of abuse. Whereas Camille said that the jury should determine her claims in context the op-ed born from her claims in the TRO where she accused him of *PHYSICAL* abuse. It's clear that the jury used Camille's definition she presented to them in her rebutal closings and they all agreed that Amber's statement which alluded to physical abuse since that is what she *publically* accused Johnny Depp of in her TRO which was made public was false. The jury can believe which ever lawyer's definition of abuse in that context is since there are no jury instructions stating otherwise. If the jury had to believe only Rotternborn's definition of abuse then when Amber and her team attempted to dismiss Johnny's case mid-trial, it would have been successful but the judge denied it and left it up to the jury to decide what lawyer's definition of abuse they choose to believe.
I hope I didn't confuse y'all even more, but look at Camille's rebutal closing argument to further understand
I can only imagine how uncomfortable being next to her while she convulsed on stand was.
Johnny Depp was pushed to his limit and reacted by using foul language. But I don’t believe that he abused her. JD abused himself by using drugs and alcohol and staying in a toxic relationship as long as he did.
Worst acting EVER . So painful to re..watch lol.
glad she's out of aquaman 2 now i can go see it when it comes out
@@aaronelijahcolyer she's still in it
@@Foxhound94 no she's not they cut her scenes and are recasting her... i just read it yesterday
@@aaronelijahcolyer it's fake dude.. tmz, ABC, CNN all have articles about what's her plan after this movie and they talked about future roles in more DC films
@@Foxhound94 the article I read was from a credible source and if they don't take her out i won't be watching the film as will a lot of others so they better remove her if they don't want the movie to flop
She was so disrespectful to the jury in her interview assuming that they were "influenced by social media". Jurors take their oaths seriously, they can potentially be fined if they don't follow the court's rules. This is clearly something Amber Heard does not understand. She thinks they must have "cheated" cause she was the one doing that the entire trial. Amber, not everyone is a manipulative liar like you...
hello beautiful lady how are you doing you have a lovely smile can we be friends??☺️☺️
On Amber's sick mind, all jurors started a whatsapp group as "Defamation Trial Friends", and they sent all funny Tiktok videos to each other during the court. She's really delusional.
👏🏻 you said it perfectly Nina
@@markbrown1539 why are you sending creepy messages to everyone :/
Hey! Did you know God is three in one!? The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit! Bless him!
Jesus died for our sins, rose from the dead, and gives salvation to everyone who believes in him and follows his commandants!
Have a blessed day, everyone!! ❤
Forget how she behaved or her team, there was enough evidence to show she was the abuser.
Did nobody get what the problem is still? The problem is that you can get ppl blindly believing accusations, with no real evidence. We should listen but never just believe. It was my problem from the get go with metoo, and how it was turned heavily against one gender too. I want it to be safe for both genders to come forward but metoo went too far.
100%. Metoo is a toxic movement that needs to end. It's unacceptable for them to reverse the burden of proof and turn it into "a man is always guilty until he can prove otherwise in a court of law".
Just speaking for myself......It was the video of her injured face that made me think JD is a wife beater.
I always understood you were innocent until actually proven guilty. Doesn't seem to work Like that these days
Thats because as soon as feminism gets involved in ANYTHING it turns toxic
@@lostwoods5687 Allegedly, never proved. And YES..... I watched the trial. Depp admitted on tape that he headbutted her. That was more than enough to prove that he did abuse her, no matter if she abused him or not. That was not what the libel was about. The jury clearly didn't get the assigment right.
Great to hear from the jury. The juror said exactly what we were thinking and saying all thd time. This is a lesson for everybody:" don't lie in court"
4:00 It's so funny that Amber was so desperate to get the jury on her side that she decided to dress like Jonny Depp!? 😂😂😂
The jurors should sue her and her lawyers for accusing them of being influenced by social media. If I was a juror and truly made an effort to avoid the news as best as I could I'd be livid.
Ugh, not every little thing should be solved by a lawsuit. Thats "America" thinking for you.
Nah, I don't think they really have grounds to sue for that. But Johnny could very easily take her back to court for defamation AGAIN - she literally posted a defamatory tweet 10 minutes after she got out of court.
@@Carts45 i dont even know what youre saying. First of all i hate metoo and never supported it. Second, the woman was just globally humiliated. Everyone hates her. Her career is ruined. No one believes a word she says. Juat because she tweets some nonsense and someone gets their little feelings hurt doesnt mean we have to throw people into the ring AGAIN. People need to know whatbto take a win, or lose, and move on without trying to get money from every single little upset they have.
The whole jury should sue her and her lawyer for saying that they were on social media and they were influenced by him because he is a famous actor,which are all lies
@@TheWorldisQuietHere3 Yes they can especially if she and her lawyer are going around accusing them of going on social media when that is a big lie
The jury had to witness this trial in person! I can't even imagine them wanting to get on social media and repeat their day? Is ludicrous!! I thank ABC for speaking the truth through this. As an ex-abused woman many years ago, I could never believe AH!! She showed no true ptsd, or symptoms of abuse. I am so happy for all abused people that truth actually overcame lies!!👍👍👏👏🙏🙏💯💯
After long days of hearing testimony, is it really a surprise jury members resisted the temptation to consult social media about the case in their personal time at home? I sat on a jury for a 2-week civil case and was desperate to talk to people about anything other than the case.
they could also just delete the app, one click and boom...all gone
@@annt7384 Good point!
I totally agree. My abusive ex also started to throw liquid in my face, just like AH did to JD. I used to run away and try to hide in the bathroom/bedroom anywhere just to get away from him, just like JD did
That is an excellent point ! Why on earth would the drained out jury, go home and watch pieces of the trial on social media?!
I wish the juror would of spoken to someone outside of the mainstream media! They continue to twist things to their narrative. They misrepresented what the juror said and completely left out a vast majority of important talking points! I suggest everyone read the print version of the story to see what the juror actually said. Of course, I'm sure that doesn't include everything..... Because why on earth would the media want to be transparent right? If you want just a quick overview of some of the main talking points, I'd suggest checking out That Umbrella guys video. I'm not some JD superfan. I'm a survivor of narcissistic abuse and I cannot stand how the media continues to downplay Heards abuse. They continue to push the "they were both abusive" narrative. It's sickening, Johnny Depp is a victim of emotional and physical abuse. Amber heard is an abuser. Stop standing up for her and start standing up for the real victim!
The jury got it right!
I always worried, and prayed to God that the jury would see what we were seeing outside. So delighted to see they did! We always had a reason to support Johnny, and his fame was not it.
ruclips.net/video/6YG157uF8hk/видео.html -
I can't believe how this happened!!!
For me his fame had nothing to do with it. I switched for Johnny's side when I'we listened like 5hours of their recordings. I was shocked how AH treated him. It was clear to me she was not the victim here
I was worried if they would buy her lies just bc she is a woman
Why use a prayer for this??? why do you think your God will make time to listen to you, for this???
The jury saw everything. They were in the courtroom. No need for them to go looking anywhere else if they have first hand access.
It wouldn't surprise me she comes out with a comment stating the male juror was just sexist and that he lying about not going to social media,and how as a so called abused victim it hurts her so much that the jurors called her fake tears crocodile tears and blah blah blah
The world needs more of these jurors
Waiting for her next interview when she claim this juror is PAID by JD . At this point i really hope JD will sue her to shut her up once & for all .... this woman is beyond repair she needs to be cast aside in jail or therapy center
She'll say another person who came out to be part of the Johnny Depp show now that the trial is over.
She will come out with a comment stating the male juror is sexist and how dare the jury said her tears were crocodile tears,and how distraught she is for claiming she was not telling the truth,and she will keep calling them liars
@@Yoyomu205 She accused a female police officer who is a lesbian and gay rights activist of being homophobic, so I wouldn't be surprised of that.
@@bonniehowell9206She is sick she accuses anyone of something that they're not plus remember how she accused johnny of being racist while she was on the stand,she just kept throwing out so many lies and being dramatic after dramatic she thought people would believe her about the fake racism claim
To be honest, I think it was her 'evidences' that actually backfired on her and did her more damage than Johnny. Whatever pictures she had of her injuries, she made them suspicious by her embellished, over the top description of whatever assault incident caused them. For the most serious and egregious assault claims, she had no photos or medical evidence and she testified herself that she 'didn't feel the need to'. So she felt the need to document less severe injuries, but didn't feel the need to neither document or seek medical help for serious injuries??
She recorded so much of audio tapes, but not only none of it had anything to incriminate Johnny, instead she was the one losing control and being toxic even when she was in control of the recording.
She couldn't make the jury believe her, because she has absolutely no self awareness about her own behavior.
Including how much obnoxious she came across as when she was questioned about the donations...that single cross examination was enough to clearly show that she is someone who does not conced even an inch and we all know how that behaviour plays it in relationships. Johnny lawyer was ecstatic after that exactly because of that...she showed exactly who she was at that moment
The most disgusting thing about this entire situation is how corporate political propaganda gleefully sold Amber's narrative for years and actively participated in destroying Depp's reputation and career.
Years ago when the entire "journalistic" community began selling the narrative en mass I instinctively knew it had to be a lie. Imagine just how many people who still trust corporate media believed their lies for years
wow you are articulate. you would make a good lawyer
The Juror hit the nail on the head! His comments are what we ALL felt based on what was presented in court! Amber Heard goes on and on about social media and ''it's influence'' but let's be fair, the MAJORITY of what did the rounds on social media were HER recordings and what was presented in court! She needs to move on and get on with her life, justice was fairly served.
I'm glad to hear the jury saw exactly what we all saw. A witness with questionable credibility and unsubstantiated claims.
@@blossominglotus2348 I have and I did. I watched the full trial and I read what the juror actually said. It’s sickening that MSM is still trying to spin this in Heard’s favor when Johnny was so clearly victimized for YEARS.
I’m so happy that a jury member came forward! The world needed to hear this because Amber & her lawyers are trashing them like THEY MADE THE WRONG DECISION!
When she said he closed his fists leaned back and then head butted her that gets me all the time lol.
Brilliant and intelligent jury. Of course it was a no brainer, but you always worry about an OJ or Casey Anthony type situation.
Intelligent?
OJ and Casey are criminal cases, the standard of proof is much higher. Also, OJ and Casey had God-tier lawyers unlike AH.
To be fair, Casey Anthony case was obvious on its face, but that poor babies body hadn't been found for so long it was impossible to prescribe a Murder 1 charge. You just can't make it fit. Yes, the means was homicide, but the method being unknown absolutely killed that case. There has to be evidence.
OJ on the other hand...I just don't have any reasons for that one.
I dunno man. You're not supposed to be interperating 'body language' as a juror. The juror claims he wasn't influenced by the massive pro-Depp campaign but hopped immediately onto tiktok to talk about the verdict!? Yah roooight!
@@aigaoliveira3278 it's a low bar these days...anyone with commonsense is deemed intelligent, given the sheer number of people without it.
2:58 That’s a wise juror. I’ve been saying this from day 1, I’m sure Johnny isn’t perfect and they were “abusive” to each other. However, abusive doesn’t necessarily mean physical abuse like the way AH pretended to describe. Calling each other names, insulting each other are all forms of abuse that’s pretty common in a lot of families including mine. AH is just a drama queen.
The thing is there’s no sign of abuse from Depp, retaliating in defence verbally when you’re being abused by someone is very common but I don’t count that in itself as abusive.
Unpleasant comments, name calling, venting in texts to your friends, I wouldn’t call that abuse.
@@linzi94 I also have a hard time accepting those things as abuse. I think we have all said things in the heat of a moment that we might later regret and that might be construed as abusive. Does that make everyone an abuser? I don't think so. And things you say to your friends in private text are not abusive to the person you're talking about. Geez the things you say when venting to a close confident are always hyperbole. No, I don't actually wish my ex would get shoved off a cliff. Its just things you say.
Right. However, I think the context matters, as it seems like he'd not say such things unprovoked.
I agree with the comments above. Initially, I thought there was mutual abuse, but the more audio I heard of her mocking him, admitting to hitting him, admitting to not giving him space or allowing him to get away when she was being aggressive, the more I realized he was pushed to his very limit and actually exhibited more self control than most people would in those situations. It was not mutual abuse, it was a knee-jerk reaction to consistent and overbearing abuse from AH. Johnny is innocent.
Why have you lied by omission and by changing what the jurors actually said? He did NOT say they were both ‘abusive’ to each other.” Abusive” is your (GMA) word. The juror said “husband & wife argument.” You misrepresented his words.
Thank you!!
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
Glad someone from the jury is speaking out. Her attacking they jury’s character saying they must have seen something on social media is so disrespectful. They gave up 6 weeks or their lives for your trial. To go on this campaign of blaming them would just make me think I made the right decision.
She claims that she "doesn't blame them" and yet says that they were on social media and being influenced by outside sources. That's blaming the jury, she just doesn't want to look bad.
@@emma-di5ly Exactly, once again making an accusation with no proof
Can they sue her for defamation? 😂
When you tell the truth your story does not change when you tell a lie it changes constantly. I agree with the juror
Hello Kim how are you doing today.
when is heard on trial for perjury..?
WHEN HE SAID HE BELIEVED THEY WERE BOTH "ABUSIVE TO EACHOTHER", HE LATER WENT ON TO SAY THAT HE MEANT THEY HAD NORMAL "HUSBAND- WIFE ARGUMENTS." NOT SURE WHY GMA WOULD LEAVE THAT PART OUT BUT Y'ALL CAN READ IT ON ROLLING STONE'S ARTICLE. THE JURY ALSO SAID MORE STUFF ON WHY THEY DID NOT BELIEVE HER.
GMA have been veiled AH supporters throughout...go back and look at the coverage
Everyone mainstream except FOX is biased in favor of the pretty white woman bc metoo. 🙄
@@gigi6997 You are so right, and I will never look at that coverage again! It makes me angry just to think about it! Even now I am utterly disgusted with George S. and his "bothsides" BS. Pending assault charge? Really? A two-minute review shows that case is nothing burger they're just throwing in to look "balanced." Depp WON a DEFAMATION case!! Let the man have his victory lap!!!
Thank you for posting the context for the abuse comment! I smelled a rat in the way they covered it given all the other comments by the juror.
Re: not sure why GMA would leave that part out, it's standard media BS. Fan the flames of controversy to get more views, and maybe to try to look less foolish for being SO BIASED against Depp in previous coverage.
SO GLAD the jury got it right!!!!!! : - )
No ABC said that the juror said they were abusive to each other - the juror never said that. The statement given to them by the juror is their words - ABC lied about what the juror said for sensationalism
Everyone who watched the trial knew this already.
I thought Johnny was losing a bit until Amber took the stand. The pledge comments were the final nail. It just reminded me of every pathological liar who would stone face lie about something that we can both see, and can both see that there's no confusion between us what we're seeing.
The audio recordings were the kill shots.
the thing is, there are "con artist liars" that you really believe what they say, but then there are liars that you can see straight through their lying teeth..she is the 2nd one
It was painfully obvious that she was lying. It was palpable. Even with the volume turned off, you could see it.
Swampfox taylor It was painfully obvious with the sound on and not watching Amber Heard while she was talking too!
I tend to be an overly empathetic person, yet I'm perceptive as well, hence why I found it difficult to listen to her for long, especially in regard to her graphic descriptions of what didn't really happen. 😡
The juror confirming what we all suspected, it was Amber's own testimony that sank her case. Turns out staring and crying without tears makes you look unbelievable.
I would love to hear what went through the juror's minds when Dr Hughes and Dr Spiegel were testifying. Those 'expert' witnesses were ...something.
That crying without tears is one of the things that sealed the deal for me. There is no one type of abuse victim and not all cry, that wouldn't make me doubt them. People have different reactions to recalling their abuse and facing their abuser. What looks incredibly suspicious is fake crying, trying to look a certain way. Fake crying is a type of lie in itself.
🤣🤣😂🤣😂
"Crocodile Tears" Yep, pretty much sums it all up.
My sister broke her nose when she got a nosejob, and it took her weeks for the dark bruising to dimish and months for the swelling to diminish. There is no way she could cover anything with makeup, at least not for several weeks.
That just tells what a great "actress " she is. I'm so glad the jurors perceive just the same as us.
Fortunately, the way she spoke on the stand when she gave all her statements seemed fake, she can't be categorized as a great actress at all 😶😶
@@christonefeltzs5149 that’s right.
@@25beee exactly
@Aneta gracias por las bendiciones. igualmente, quien escribe?
She mistook every question as a separate take whereas it was a single long take the moment she steps into the court room.
I’m so glad everyone see’s through Amber’s BS
Again… the talk show they mention (2:26) was in the Netherlands, NOT in the UK!
It truly surprises me that even a juror makes that mistake…
Her lawyers was rude.
Just reflecting their client, IMHO. It's what she wanted and expected from them.
Good to hear the jury saw what we saw.
Please don’t imply that the jurors went by their FEELINGS. They listened to the facts and evidence. They thought what we all thought. She was LYING.
Juror’s actual statement portion they butchered:
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
Amazing how the jury came to the same conclusion as most of the world! Great job jurors
Hello Maria, permit me to know you privately?
Well done jury member for clearing things up.
@Johnny Depp Content intended to impersonate a person or channel is not allowed on RUclips. RUclips also enforces trademark holder rights. When a channel, or content in the channel, causes confusion about the source of goods and services advertised, it may not be allowed.
RUclips may terminate your channel or account for repeated violations of the Community Guidelines or Terms of Service. RUclips may also terminate your channel or account after a single case of severe abuse, or when the channel is dedicated to a policy violation.
Thank you Jurors, for doing what was right. You were intelligent and discerning in your verdict.
Well done Juror, they are smart and don't fall for BS. Now someone from social media pls come out and speak on MY behalf that I too was no Johnny or Jack Sparrow fan but that watching AMBER TESTIFY lost her case for me. I just didnt believe her!
Lol I relate! Stop saying I'm a deluded Johnny Depp fan! I've never even seen most of his movies, and I went into the trial believing Amber Heard!
God bless this Juror for coming forward!! These are the headlines we want GMA!
For those of you wondering if this *"abusive to eachother"* line, would help Amber's appeal, no it will not at all. Here's why.
The jury was not given jury instructions defining abuse or what type of abuse they must believe. Rotternborn tried to pigeonhole them into HIS wide definition of abuse. Whereas Camille said that the jury should determine her claims in context the op-ed born from her claims in the TRO where she publically accused him of *PHYSICAL* abuse. It's clear that the jury used Camille's definition she presented to them in her rebutal closings and they all agreed that Amber's statement which alluded to physical abuse since that is what she *publically* accused Johnny Depp of in her TRO which was made public was false. The jury can believe which ever lawyer's definition of abuse in that context is since there are no jury instructions stating otherwise. If the jury had to believe only Rotternborn's definition of abuse then when Amber and her team attempted to dismiss Johnny's case mid-trial, it would have been successful but the judge denied it and left it up to the jury to decide what lawyer's definition of abuse they choose to believe.
I hope I didn't confuse y'all even more, but look at Camille's rebutal closing argument to further understand
Actually the Juror never said that they were abusive to eachother, he said they were Yelling at eachother. THe reporter switche the word yelling for abuse, This people are rats.
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
Basically jurors thought she deserved a Razzie for her performance on stand 😂
She does 😂😂😂😂. Worst acting I've ever seen, even worse than Kristen Stewart in Twilight
It actually looks like the media is starting to catch up with the rest of us.
Aside from mentioning the bogus assault case pending against Depp. Sigh. Witnesses to the supposed "fight" have already said Depp did nothing wrong, but they just can't let him have an untainted moment of victory.
But yes--this was a HUGE step in the right direction!
The mutual abuse thing was never said by the juror.
This people are covertly trying to make her seem less guilty than she is.
Source? Would really appreciate it
The interview transcript is online. Multiple articles hace the original quotes.
They are misrepresenting the words.
@@ashwinashu4825 You can check the RollingStones article. the quotes are accurate.
Thank you very much
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
I don't agree that they were both abusive to each other. There is only one guilty party in this, the person who brought false allegations (with zero actual evidence) and destroyed a person's life and career for six years.
Yup It was clearly a toxic relationship on both sides only Amber Heard was vindictive and wanted to take down her ex and not own up to her actions. She needs help.
If you saw the trial, you can hear him also yelling and sending horrible text messages. That's verbal abuse. I don't believe he ever hit her though.
In the full article, it's more detailed and says: The jury concluded "they were both abusive to each other" but Heard’s team failed to prove Depp’s abuse was physical."
I believe Johnny never hit her, but I could see him being verbally abusive, but the door absolutely swings both ways. If you're with a person as frustrating as Amber how could you not lash out? It's either leave her or start screaming.
Yeah, I highly disagree with both being abusive, it was clearly her who instigated the escalation of arguments and violence, I feel like saying they were both abusive towards each other is just a people pleasing answer to not have to enter into any arguments.
I listened to that man talk for two minutes about “how much they focused on her nuances” and “being disliked can make all the difference” … I would be exaggerating if I said it made my stomach turn but you see how it made me feel. I just wish one of these people would worry more about the truth than about their screen time on a major network & a paycheck. The truth of this case is that woman threatened him a week before she claimed he hit her and he lost everything immediately. The truth is that a jury found that he hadn’t hit her a single time in his life. The truth is that she admitted on audio submitted in court that she hit him and she couldn’t promise she won’t do it again. The truth is she physically abused that man and you are all dancing around it because she’s small and pretty and a woman. The truth is Johnny Depp didn’t get a trial before he was blacklisted immediately. I wish you people would talk about the truth more often than dancing around it. She lied and none of you are punishing her for it even after *the law* punished her. He was mean to her so its okay for her to hit him? She’s small so it’s okay for her to punch slap and scratch you when she’s angry? Look at the message you’re sending to actual victims of domestic abuse. It’s disgusting. There’s a reason why random ass lawyers with cameras at home are getting more views and engagement than these multimillion dollar news studios. Look at how you all cover the news. Ridiculous.
He wasn't even mean to her until she chipped away at him with her shrill insults and degradation. I don't even watch MSM much anymore. I'd rather watch someone with real life experience and knowledge put in their real opinion and expertise. MSM has some strong censorship in the name of "political incorrectness."
Amen 🙏 very well put.
Wow! You reveal the truth here! They are still trying to blur it up. Disgusting.
@@annatrivia7045Thanks for your continuous love and support towards me ❤️
How long have you been a fan of mine??
That assault case JD was sued for was bogus as well- it was staged from AH team- they had video showing JD never touched him- that's Y the dude settled out - he was scared of looking like a fool & Liar - like AH did
Thank you to the jury for your wisdom.
Hello, Jeanette how are you doing today?
hello beautiful lady how are you doing you have a lovely smile can we be friends??☺️☺️
Hello Jeanette, permit me to know you privately.
Thank you for your service and for speaking out anon juror.
Hello, Gorgeous how are you doing today?
GMA... Why did you leave out what this juror actually said?
Why are you trying to change this juror words to paint a better picture of this so called POS AH ?
She keeps defaming him though ! In her interview she says she stands by every word she said. In other word, that she WAS indeed abused... What's that about ???
It’s interesting though how she didn’t say it again. Neither did the interviewer.
Hello, Marie how are you doing today?
Judge should file a ‘cease and desist’ order against her…she is still doing what the jury found her guilty of…
Hello Marie, permit me to know you privately.
The jury is all of us. They saw what we saw. And we all agreed. Plain and simple.
I'm so glad that someone has finally put out a video demonstrating an actual bruise and how it's impossible to completely hide one. Thank you
"He balled up his fist, he leaned back and head butted me!" LOL she's a great comedian.
😂
Elaine: He wants to seek 15 minutes of fame 🤷🏻♀️
Lol
GMA! Please go into detail about "abusive towards each other". What the juror actually said was that "they had their husband/wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other..." If that is a crime, all marriages and relationships would be a crime. 😆
For those keen to be given the juror’s ACTUAL WORDS: “They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other. I don’t think that makes either of them right or wrong. That’s what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn’t enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying.”
Big mistake, to look at the jury, and make them feel uncomfortable.
She was trying to connect with them but it backfired because she was very obviously lying and trying to manipulate. Which is even more off putting than not looking at them at all .
During sidebars. She stared at them too. Its weird. I would understand that if she was testifying and looking at them but still staring during sidebars? Incredibly weird!
I still find it fascinating that they'd say "They were abusive to each other." Johnny clearly never abused her. He reacted as she attacked and provoked him. They still blame the man on some level.
The juror did say they were abusive to each other but said he did not believe Johnny hit her. It's in the clip. I assume he meant Johnny was verbally abusive to her.
Literally. There cannot be two abusers. Especially in a heterosexual relationship. A woman whose being beaten doesn’t stand a chance a against a man. Do you think a fragile skinny pretty lady is matching blows with an older dude. Evidence clearly showed she was an abuser and johnny tried his hardest to escape it and avoid it. Inner frustration is bound to be released by mean words. Thats normal.
If 2 people in a relationship are constantly arguing with one another, saying the meanest things in the moment are they abusing each other. Does it also follow that they are both victims of domestic abuse and perpetrators of DA.
The word abuse is being conflated unhelpfully and using the word for being nasty to one another is not best for evaluating DA.
@@sanjx4300 yea true. Not only that, but apparently sending a text to your friend also constitutes DV against her. The scope of that definition is way too wide for some people.
@@jeanespinal2041 I believe everyone has used abusive language to someone, but what she accused JD of doing I believe she was taking what she did him and putting it on JD . I find it appalling what Elaine and AH have done after the trial . I believe Elaine should be disbarred for her wanting 15 minutes of fame. Elaine sounds a lot like AH , put what you’re doing an apply it to the witnesses. Every chance she got she told JD’S witnesses, you wanted to be on national tv . The whole time it was Elaine who couldn’t resist to be on national tv.
I didn’t see Johnny Depp look at the jury at all. While Amber couldn’t stop focusing on them.
Yo
“Staring at the jury made us uncomfortable” 🤣🤣🤣🤣 glad they felt it too.
Hello, Hesti how are you doing today?
hello beautiful lady how are you doing you have a lovely smile can we be friends??☺️☺️
There we go. Looking at the jury at every answer, the changes of emotions and the contradicting statements was what everyone was thinking. It wasnt believable the moment she was put on the stand
Disappointing GMA, why did u misquote the juror in AH s favor? Lost trust.
Good job, jury! But even if she had been a better actor, looked at the jury less and her lawyer had been more amiable, how could any jury have ignored those incredibly agressive, threatening audios or the fact that her "mountain of evidence" was not even a hill.
...and all the lies! Photoshopped photos.entertaining men in JD Penthouse while married.
Yes. The juror really should have said that she was convicted because of the recordings and all the evidence and not cause she seemed off and did not sound credible on the stand. That diminishes the verdict. And he should definitely not have said that they both were abusive to each other. Like wtf. According to the verdict, Johnny was falsely accused of abuse and defamed.
@@riase I agree. Amber's team is going to pounce on that statement
@@riase The juror did say (just not in so many words) that the evidence didn't support Amber's claims. He said her stories didn't add up and that the evidence didn't match what she claimed happened. So, there's nothing here for Amber's team to pounce on.