@@samuelspears6509 True, what he said is true depending on how far the destiny of every folk in Europe depended on Rome. However, years after years unt development started to rise among the folks in Europe that gave them the ability to upgrade their own civilizations on their own was a clear *clarified* sign that they are done with being a part of an Empire. That's the development he talked about.
How quickly it goes from german unification, to WW1, to WW2, then the collapse of the soviet union really shows just how quickly things are occurring in recent times. These 4 events are monumental cornerstones of what we consider "history", and they take up less than 5% of the video
History is much longer and much more storied than a lot of people realize. We have so many records of modern history (the last ~500 years) and so few from any time before that, that all those periods seem much shorter than they actually were, comparatively. It's a tragedy because the period from around the end of the bronze age to the beginning of the muslim conquests (~800BC-600AD) has not just a complete upheaval of the world several times over, but the foundations and developments of basically every school of thought and religion that we still have with us today. But that era is also 1400 years long, and we hardly know anything about it compared to the imperialist/modern era, which is 1/3 the length of time. Nevermind those 4 events, which all happened in the last 150 years.
Dear Steven, Europe is nice and I hope for you that you can visit one day this beautiful and diverse continent. I love to be European/German and enjoy this diversity. But don't forget the precious history and nature of your home. It's not only the time of the USA since 1776 or the Pilgrims of 1620, it's also the history of the Indians and also the history to be the torch of freedom. It was the USA that was the first modern democracy and your declaration of independence - although so many of the young generation don't honor it anymore - is a masterpiece of the enlightenment. This is, why I love your country so much although I feel bad because I don't agree with so many of your current foreign policy and lately I don't like this developments of the woke movement which in my view is a betray and huge danger of the enlightenment. Nevertheless, the USA was the first state in the world where individual but equal rights were introduced and this contribution to humans’ history is remarkable and can't be overestimated! The approach that everybody should be treated same (equal rights) is an astonishing revolution to organize a state. And, what the woke misunderstand, this does not mean to get equal outcome as so many of them believe. Your own individual pursuit of happiness determines the outcome and this by definition - as we humans are different - must lead to different outcome. Thus, equal outcome can only be achieved by unequal rights/opportunities and this is, why I believe this ideology is dangerous and would lead into tyranny and bring us back to the dark old time. Although I praise the American declaration of independence and democracy, it took time to translate this ideal in real equal rights and the current woke criticize this - fair enough. But it was the USA/the West that made it and overcame step by step exisiting burdens and no other nation achieved this before. Instead of celebrating that the US society was able to overcome the gap between ideal and reality they want to overcome the so called structural racism, patriarchy and white supremacist which in my view hardly exist anymore. This does not mean we are perfect now, but it seems we were on a good path and hopefully the woke can't create their new aristocratic system where so called deprived people should get privileged access to power - this would be a huge step back. I grew up in such an society where children of academics were punished with limited access to universities. But the only feature that enables should be competence. Of course, the USA is not perfect in creating equal opportunities and there is still huge room for improvement but we should work on to overcome this by creating equal chances instead of creating a discriminating system where people get privileged access just due to their sex, sexual orientation, race or what else. Thus, we have especially to keep an eye on the woke movement that they don't poisoning the society with such a totalitarian equal outcome virus. But I have trust that this will not happen - you/we have created a better system we ever saw in 10,000 years of civilization and it would be a pity if this doesn’t survive. Wasn't it an amazing ping pong of the mainly European philosophers that created the intellectual basis of an enlightened democracy and the American "Makers", that translated it into the first modern society and re-influenced Europe to follow the Americas successful experiment? Thus, USA and Europe can be proud of that what our common fathers and mothers have achieved, and we should conserve this and - where necessary - improve this. P.S.: Sorry - I might exaggerate with the statement above but I see on the one hand too often arrogant Americans (we are the best) but also on the other hand so many like you, that look wistfully to Europe and believe they don't have an interesting history. This is in my view not true - The US-history is so incredible and I think USA and Europe have similar roots that connects Europe’s history strongly with the US-history - but you have also in addition the rich history of natives and indeed the incredible success history to be the first modern democracy. Instead of questioning this and even try to overcome the good what the USA achieved as the woke wants, be proud to your history without the feeling of superiority/inferiority. Best Michael
I love how the music is in synchrony with some major events like for example german's invasion during second world war. Brilliant video, thanks for sharing all this forgotten knowledge
Love and German raids doesn't match at all! By the way, absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars This video clearly didn't teach you to put things in perspective when it's about borders, nationality and history. To me it did.
That's nonsense, because there was no such thing as Germany back then. For the rest, it is at least positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@VCYT If the wars were outside of Europe, these wars will not be considered world wars. The except for the US (and Japan in WW2) all major powers of that time were in Europe.
Not a great job because absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@ВсеволодКрасненьков they are the only "Slavic" coutry to use Fascism and only Balkan country to use Fascism. They are traitors and Turko-Uralic tribe. They have no right to call themselfs Slavic.
Rome is that one country in worldbox where they'd unite a whole continent under their banner, rule for a lot of time, then constant civil wars and rebellions would start before exhausting the empire and disintegrating into smaller states.
I love the bias in the ending. Doesn't include Kosovo even though it's recognized by 117 countries. Meanwhile, you're including Donetsk and Luhansk, which... hasn't been recognized by a single nation
The reason to mark a territory as a separated state is the fact of ermed forces and independent laws acting on this territory. It absolutely does not matter how many other states have approved the proclaimed independance. It should be relied on who controls the land and only on it. So LDNR and Kosovo should both be marked. I understand motives of the author not to exclude Kosovo from Serbia but he should be a proffessional.
Red Komunyaka I know. I didn't say that Donetsk and Luhansk shouldn't be included. I was only trying to prove what I was saying. If you don't wanna include a specific state, then why not include any of them to prevent bias?
Moravia didn't just cease to exist and become part of bohemia in the tenth century, it was still somewhat independent, being in a union with bohemia since the late tenth century and sometimes being under the ruke of a differnent ruler (for example in the second half of 15th century, bohemia was ruled by Vladislav Jagellon but Moravia and Silesia were ruled by hungarian king Mathias)
In any case, there was Great Moravia in the 9th century, which was an empire by the standards of the time and is also called that by Wiki. By the way, absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars all empires that ever have been are a cooperation of smaller duchies or territories. The Holy Roman Empire was no different. England, was a commonwealth or "co-op" between many local lords all vying for regional power, the same was with the Ayubids, the Persians, the Chinese emperor kingdoms. To claim that an empire is ever anything more than the willingness of its citizens to continue under the current leadership and laws is and always was inherently incorrect. There are only 2 reasons wars are fought on a local level, the first, which is the most common in history, is over oppressive laws and leadership oftentimes levying taxes on goods or even confiscation causing mass starvation in the name of a foreign attempt at conquest. The second is over rights to land, status, and title, still very common but less common that foreign intervention as most titular conflicts were snuffed out before conflicts arose by the ruling power at the time in each respective government. As for your translation about the Polish - Lithuanian Commonwealth, I'm unsure how you can claim it is translated incorrectly. You yourself translated it into the very words or prefixes within the title you claimed was incorrect so perhaps site where the true name came from to source its genesis instead of arguing over the translation.
@@christianjohns8352 Such nonsense, as if in real empires the regions were constantly at war and there was in this empires no central power as was the case in the Holy Roman Realm. By definition, an empire is usually a very large in terms of area multi-ethnic state with a strong central power and with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. The Holy Roman Realm wasn't all that, because it wasn't even a state and certainly not an empire. That was just a patchwork of territories consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other territories. A complex of territories without a generally recognized central authority! That were all German small states. This all German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a unified could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. Ridiculous to call something like that an empire!
Glad to see you added the Spanish kingdoms disappear after the French kings took over Spain. Even after the Spanish unification in the 15th century, the small kingdoms that made up Spain kept existing until the 1700s
and in a strange way it makes you respect Portugal even more. i'm curious if any of the separatists movements in Spain have reverence for the Portuguese. ?
That is not the best historical timelaps video because absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars Interesujace nigdy niewidzialem zeby ktos uzywal term 'Polish Empire' zamiast 'Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth'. Tylko znam jedna ksiazke z tytulem 'Polskie Imperium' ale jej jeszcze nieprzaeczytalem
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 Już czytałem o 'Polish Empir! Ale masz rację, to jest rzadko! Ale Polacy powinni z dumą mówić o 'Polish Empir i nie posługiwać się absurdalnym Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Niestety RUclips nie akceptuje linku, w którym można przeczytać o Polish Empir. Ale jeśli wygooglujesz: "The Empire of Poland and the Baltic Nations" możesz znaleźć link! Cytat: Tytuł: "The Empire of Poland and the Baltic Nations! The Empire of Poland, at times, has reached from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea; its territory being important for its position along trade routes in the Baltic Region. Poland’s closest Baltic neighbor (Lithuania), has been a valued ally in the battle for freedom from foreign rule of Sweden, Germany, Russia, Prussia and Austria since 1386. Although the Polish Empire was continually invaded, beginning in 1605, technology and education in Poland remained strong and progressive for the time and "polonization" of the Lithuanian nobility was evident."
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars RUclips jest okropny jesli chodzi o wyswietlenia komentarzy. Juz pojde czytac o tym, jak masz jakies inne rekomendacje to chentnie sie popatrze
Founding of Rome: 0:08 Roman Republic: 1:08 Roman Empire: 3:08 Rome falls: 5:14 Constantinople falls: 9:18 The Romans have lasted over 9 minutes. 8 if you only count the Republic and Empire.
At that time (it was the 1st dynasty) the laws of inheritance was about dividing your possessions to all of your sons equally. That's why untill 987(1st king of the third dynasty, the "Capetiens"), every king divided their kingdom to give each of their sons a part, and then each son will divid theirs to give their sons...etc (hope i'm clear ^^)
One thing important to notice is that, despite the division into several parts, all Frankish heirs considered their respective kingdoms as part of the same realm : Francia. This is why it wasn’t so difficult to reunite it regularly. Everything changed in the tenth century when the Carolingians lost their power.
That's one of the downside of this version: he didn't really show the cultural links between the different entities. Even while divided, it was still Francia, but ruled by different people. Way later, he also misrepresented the Angevin empire a bit for a more or less similar reason. But to be fair, it's hard to be representative of the political context of Europe throughout history in a simple map, since things were sometimes very subtle. I really like Ollie Bye's work regarding that, you should look up that channel.
Where is Kosovo on your map? Established in 2008? Seems implausible considering your website is called BALKAN HISTORY! Is Kosovo not a part of Balkan history?
Just a few mistakes that almost everyone gets wrong about Bulgaria. 1. Old Great Bulgaria was the largest state created by a group of many tribes who walked on many lands and created many empires and states. OG Bulgaria in modern Ukraine was the largest they created under the name Bulgaria. The state was just a few numbers shy from reaching 1,000 000 square kilometers. 2. The sheer size and position was the reason why Old Great Bulgaria fell to the turks. The state got so big in such a short amount of time that defending it against the never ending attacks from the neighboring turkic states became a task too big so the sons of Kubrat decided to seek their fortune elsewhere. 3. The territories of Danube Bulgaria were a continuation of Old Great Bulgaria. Asparuh did not move his father's state on the Balkans he just concentrated the tribes he inherited plus what he could salvage from OG Bulgaria around the Danube river. While smaller and sparsely populated Asparuh's Bulgaria was better positioned and proved a challenge for the Khazars the Avars and even the Roman themselves who were paying tribute to him. 4. The Bulgarian empire did not loose territories to the Magyars quite the opposite. Simeon the Great ultimately defeated them which forced them to move in the Bulgarian territories in Pannonia. Those territories were lost just like most of Bulgaria when the Rus and the Romans simultaneously attacked Bulgaria. Our empire fell apart. The Romans tricked the Rus and toke control of the Danube for a short period. I wish at least some of this was taken in to account or at the very least the Pannonian part is but for some reason the Bulgarian empire always ends up as the loosing side despite the victory against said foe. Whoever heard of an empire giving away it's territories to the side that suffered defeat? Unprecedented imo.
Can't imagine what gave me away. Basil was his western name around here in the lands he was known to rule over he was known as Vasilii. Anyway it's a misconception that Bulgarians lived poorly during his reign quite the contrary in fact. It was his successors who messed up. If they all treated us the same as Vasilii II the movement that lead to the creation of the second Bulgarian empire would not have happened. But by some miracle if you happen to find a single Roman let him come. A Bulgarian is not a Bulgarian if he can't handle 2 to 3 Romans at the same time.
Also a absolutely negative mistake is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
This is awesome. I can't imagine how much work went into this what amazes me is that until in the late 1800s there were tons of little Nations or countries. But after that the country's seem to get a lot bigger. Why was this?
They called themselves roman until their end in 1400s. As they had practically transferred all roman laws and edicts to the new city. Byzantine was never a thing until modern historians began to call them this to keep it simple
@@gjergjcamaj5770 No, it was German historians who started calling them that to distance the empire from Rome so that the HRE would look more official in comparison
great job man 😄 even for the other side of the Mediterranean it's correct , just a small correction "Ifriquya " referes to the actual Tunisia, tripolitania and a very small part of the eastern actual Algeria but not the whole of North Africa. but any way it's a great video . Bravo👍😉
The Ottomans didn't conquer all this part of northern Algeria an other mistake, because there was many berber kingdoms in the south of the Algerian coast
This is fantastic! - although I question the consistency of unrecognized nations at the end. Putting Donetsk and Luhansk but not Kosovo? C’mon brother - I know it hurts lol, and they might not deserve it, but it’s the only way to be consistent here.
@@aleksandarv2207 You either show the de jure borders for everyone or the de facto borders for everyone. Showing Transistria and the DPR & LPR but not Kosovo is massive cope. Be consistent even if it triggers you politically.
0:08 just clicked in and spotted a mistake . At the 8th century BC , Macedonia consisted of the regions of Istiotida and Edonis ; the borders portrayed in the video are those of the 5th century .
Se ve algunos fallos. 1. En el principio de la Edad Media aparece "Italia" hasta la conquista de los francos cuando en realidad era el reino Lombardo. 2. Navarra, su nombre inicial era Pamplona, Navarra fue a partir del 1200 y en esa fecha las Vascongadas pasó a ser parte de Castilla y no un siglo más tarde como aquí aparece. 3. El Rosellón fue español hasta mediados del siglo XVII.
Hay muchos fallos en este vídeo. A mí me molesta por ejemplo que pongan que España no existía como Estado hasta bien las reformas borbónicas ya en los 1700s. Si fuese así, entonces podríamos separar al Reino Unido en Inglaterra, Escocia, Gales e Irlanda del Norte, ya que son las cuatro naciones que representan ese país y juegan olímpicamente separados. ¿Eso no ponen, verdad? Pero a España si la ponen separada basándose en la Leyenda Negra. Que conste que no soy español, pero si pones a España dividida hasta 1700s, entonces Reino Unido tendría que estar dividida desde 1707, con la Reina Ana.
So apparently you put luhanks and donetsk which havent been recognized by a single country but u didnt put kosovo which was recognized by 60% of world countries
Kosovo is inpendent but you forgot Kosovo i know you are serb and hatte US shqiptars but you have e to know that Kosovo excist We are independent since 2008
@Marko Topic also just so you know, barely any Germans knew about what was going on inside concentration camps. Besides, their reasoning for invading Europe is understandable. As you know, Austria started WW1 but everyone gave Germany the blame. Instead of punishing the people that ran the government during the war, they (the US, the UK and France) decided to make a really harsh treaty that punished all German people regardless of their opinion on the war. The German people were unfairly punished to the extremes. The equivalent of 1 mark soon becamt 1 million marks. Your thinking is basically like punishing someone with ADHD for fidgeting too much. You can't punish a people for what the government did
Yeah! Nice video! A small error in this: as an italian, i can say that Rome isn’t rome, but its the civilization called “Latins”, that then merged with the etruscs
Which is not a small error and absolutely negative that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita. But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
I know who youre youre the making mostly balkan countries youre greek I have to say I saw Greece Athens and Selanik Im from Turkey Too smilar also my familie use to live in Selanik "theselaniko" and bulgaria they were Balkan Turks after the Ballan Wars they are living in Istanbul
What’s it called when a region has a bunch of small states emerge after a large country collapses? Balkanization doesn’t quite hit the nail on the head, and Feudalism is more of a definition of a hierarchy than a description of multiple states existing. Does anyone know what the phenomenon is called when multiple small states emerge?
I love how nearly two whole minutes of this is just Rome... Ah, they don't make empires like they used to
Because ppl became more smarter.
@@DBT1007 Firstly, it's smarter or more smart, not more smarter. Secondly, clarify please?
@@samuelspears6509 True, what he said is true depending on how far the destiny of every folk in Europe depended on Rome. However, years after years unt development started to rise among the folks in Europe that gave them the ability to upgrade their own civilizations on their own was a clear *clarified* sign that they are done with being a part of an Empire. That's the development he talked about.
Crete lasted 1100 years
Probaly because thare is none
120AD countries of Europe:
1) Roman Empire
lala lolol
And some german tribes...
2) Not again...
1,020AD countries of Europe
1, 2, 3, 4... ah, hold on I'll be back in an hour.
Vlad Mărgăritescu Bosporan kingdom was technically part of Rome
@Vlad Mărgăritescu made by romans for romans and ruled by romans
How quickly it goes from german unification, to WW1, to WW2, then the collapse of the soviet union really shows just how quickly things are occurring in recent times. These 4 events are monumental cornerstones of what we consider "history", and they take up less than 5% of the video
History is much longer and much more storied than a lot of people realize. We have so many records of modern history (the last ~500 years) and so few from any time before that, that all those periods seem much shorter than they actually were, comparatively. It's a tragedy because the period from around the end of the bronze age to the beginning of the muslim conquests (~800BC-600AD) has not just a complete upheaval of the world several times over, but the foundations and developments of basically every school of thought and religion that we still have with us today. But that era is also 1400 years long, and we hardly know anything about it compared to the imperialist/modern era, which is 1/3 the length of time. Nevermind those 4 events, which all happened in the last 150 years.
This is definitely an improvement from the last one. Glad to see areas like Germany, England, and Scandinavia more accurately covered too. Great Job!
What up gypsy.
Princip History - Videomapper Yep.
Why do I get a sense that the Carthagins and the Persian ain’t accurate
Kosovo free 2005!!!!
@@ghostleader61 No Kosovo Serbia forever
I’m from the US. I really love Europe because of its big history, and languages. I have never been to Europe, but I would love to go.
Reconnect.
Please do it's amazing over here
You'll be welcome.
Dear Steven,
Europe is nice and I hope for you that you can visit one day this beautiful and diverse continent. I love to be European/German and enjoy this diversity.
But don't forget the precious history and nature of your home. It's not only the time of the USA since 1776 or the Pilgrims of 1620, it's also the history of the Indians and also the history to be the torch of freedom. It was the USA that was the first modern democracy and your declaration of independence - although so many of the young generation don't honor it anymore - is a masterpiece of the enlightenment. This is, why I love your country so much although I feel bad because I don't agree with so many of your current foreign policy and lately I don't like this developments of the woke movement which in my view is a betray and huge danger of the enlightenment. Nevertheless, the USA was the first state in the world where individual but equal rights were introduced and this contribution to humans’ history is remarkable and can't be overestimated! The approach that everybody should be treated same (equal rights) is an astonishing revolution to organize a state. And, what the woke misunderstand, this does not mean to get equal outcome as so many of them believe. Your own individual pursuit of happiness determines the outcome and this by definition - as we humans are different - must lead to different outcome. Thus, equal outcome can only be achieved by unequal rights/opportunities and this is, why I believe this ideology is dangerous and would lead into tyranny and bring us back to the dark old time.
Although I praise the American declaration of independence and democracy, it took time to translate this ideal in real equal rights and the current woke criticize this - fair enough. But it was the USA/the West that made it and overcame step by step exisiting burdens and no other nation achieved this before. Instead of celebrating that the US society was able to overcome the gap between ideal and reality they want to overcome the so called structural racism, patriarchy and white supremacist which in my view hardly exist anymore. This does not mean we are perfect now, but it seems we were on a good path and hopefully the woke can't create their new aristocratic system where so called deprived people should get privileged access to power - this would be a huge step back. I grew up in such an society where children of academics were punished with limited access to universities. But the only feature that enables should be competence. Of course, the USA is not perfect in creating equal opportunities and there is still huge room for improvement but we should work on to overcome this by creating equal chances instead of creating a discriminating system where people get privileged access just due to their sex, sexual orientation, race or what else. Thus, we have especially to keep an eye on the woke movement that they don't poisoning the society with such a totalitarian equal outcome virus. But I have trust that this will not happen - you/we have created a better system we ever saw in 10,000 years of civilization and it would be a pity if this doesn’t survive.
Wasn't it an amazing ping pong of the mainly European philosophers that created the intellectual basis of an enlightened democracy and the American "Makers", that translated it into the first modern society and re-influenced Europe to follow the Americas successful experiment? Thus, USA and Europe can be proud of that what our common fathers and mothers have achieved, and we should conserve this and - where necessary - improve this.
P.S.: Sorry - I might exaggerate with the statement above but I see on the one hand too often arrogant Americans (we are the best) but also on the other hand so many like you, that look wistfully to Europe and believe they don't have an interesting history. This is in my view not true - The US-history is so incredible and I think USA and Europe have similar roots that connects Europe’s history strongly with the US-history - but you have also in addition the rich history of natives and indeed the incredible success history to be the first modern democracy. Instead of questioning this and even try to overcome the good what the USA achieved as the woke wants, be proud to your history without the feeling of superiority/inferiority.
Best
Michael
@@schoeppemichael lol
I love how the music is in synchrony with some major events like for example german's invasion during second world war. Brilliant video, thanks for sharing all this forgotten knowledge
Love and German raids doesn't match at all! By the way, absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita
or written in English Shechpospolita.
But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars This video clearly didn't teach you to put things in perspective when it's about borders, nationality and history. To me it did.
I love how you perfectly timed the music with the shattering of Germany into the Holy Roman Empire
Arminius. Fuck Rome.
That's nonsense, because there was no such thing as Germany back then. For the rest, it is at least positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars yea, it was called East Francia
@@Randomdude112 Yeah right!
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars btw I mean before The Holy Roman Empire was east Francia
8:21 *Mongols teleports behind you* Cumans: Nani
Hungary contract cumans for invade Bohemia. Wenceslaus IV: NANI!
@@adnan_honest_jihadist5775Mongols invade china 1279: NANI???
*Mongols:* omae wu sindeiru
*Cumans:* NANI
@@barsukascool China: NANI
@yang shang lol
11:13 Ww1
11:19 ww2
2 world wars in 6 seconds
An both wars were started by idiots in mainland Europe.
VC YT The two world wars were terrible.We should cherish peace.
Although I am Scottish
@Cosmic Fool often historians overlook patterns of force.
@@VCYT Christian Europeans as always..
@@VCYT If the wars were outside of Europe, these wars will not be considered world wars. The except for the US (and Japan in WW2) all major powers of that time were in Europe.
4:55 You're missing the year 406 AD o.O
Brilliant guy 🙏
Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus very important year that was. The rest of the video literally makes no sense without the context of that year
So you are insulting and joking at him for giving him small feedback for something he did wrong.Very cool
Hey Tiberius are you the younger or elder?
@@antoninuslarpus7107 the older, the younger was Gaius sampronius Graccus :)
Great job !
Yep
Not a great job because absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita
or written in English Shechpospolita.
But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars they weren’t one state in that year they were in a personal union
@@pinghpin3 A personal union dominated and ruled by the Poles!
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars he’s a pro Russian just look at the end of the video
It’s 1929 I look away for a second then Germany’s divided into pieces
Rome: im only one empire
Hunnic Empire: hold my kavimler gocu
@Swerk HD Production - SHP so funny. Huns are Turks. Balamir, Attila were Turkish Khanans. Pechenegs, Kipchaks, Kyrgyzs, Avara Turkic tribes.
You mean Alexander the Great:hold my beer I reached India.
The huns made an appearance just to fuck up the Roman Empire, and then, they disappeared again. Hahaha
@@ΚωνσταντίνοςΜπουτινας if alexander didn't die so young today everyone would have been under greek rule
and we would have martian colonies
@@TheHunterOfYharnam το ξερω
The best history of Europe video
Тако је Брат!
And today you must suck under the Germans. Your are not slavs- your hunns
@Demy Troy no, Bulgarian are Slav
@Demy Troy they are Tatars, Turko-Uralic tribe, they have no right to call themselfs Slavic.
@@ВсеволодКрасненьков they are the only "Slavic" coutry to use Fascism and only Balkan country to use Fascism. They are traitors and Turko-Uralic tribe. They have no right to call themselfs Slavic.
Rome is that one country in worldbox where they'd unite a whole continent under their banner, rule for a lot of time, then constant civil wars and rebellions would start before exhausting the empire and disintegrating into smaller states.
@Vlačko they are all united and larger and more organized than ever before. EU
what if the world is just a more advanced worldbox and we live inside it
@@cronjustin11 but in that time were only one language, one religion, one ruler, one army. one culture, one way, the way of Rome
I love the bias in the ending. Doesn't include Kosovo even though it's recognized by 117 countries. Meanwhile, you're including Donetsk and Luhansk, which... hasn't been recognized by a single nation
The reason to mark a territory as a separated state is the fact of ermed forces and independent laws acting on this territory. It absolutely does not matter how many other states have approved the proclaimed independance. It should be relied on who controls the land and only on it. So LDNR and Kosovo should both be marked.
I understand motives of the author not to exclude Kosovo from Serbia but he should be a proffessional.
The creator of this video is Serbian.
Red Komunyaka I know. I didn't say that Donetsk and Luhansk shouldn't be included. I was only trying to prove what I was saying. If you don't wanna include a specific state, then why not include any of them to prevent bias?
Thats it because donetsk and luhansk are rightfully russia and kosovo is rightfuly serbia. Simple.
Joker, I do not dispute. It's for serbian author to mean this nonconformity.
Helal olsun.Kıbrısı doğru şekilde göstermişler.Very Good video.
Everytime I visit a European city, I come back to this video to help me put its history in context.
4:53 the saddest part ever 😢😭
@@onurcnky just stfu stop being such a dick
that would be 9:15
Ama ben oraya bayılıyorum
@@gerald1495 and not the crusaders sacking Constantinople?
@@pakitech1496 fun fact: the Crusades were a response to three hundred years of Muslim invasion (the Crusades were COUNTER-attack).
*PORTUGAL* : maybe if I stand still Spain won't see me here
Europe, Middle East, Asia & Africa: *Exists*
Rome: It's the free real estate!
AMAZING !!! Nice work, once again S&F...
Portugal just chilling at the edge
yeah just chillin with the oldest established borders in Europe. almost 1000 years
Chilling while Moors have their daughters 🤤🤤🤤
Moravia didn't just cease to exist and become part of bohemia in the tenth century, it was still somewhat independent, being in a union with bohemia since the late tenth century and sometimes being under the ruke of a differnent ruler (for example in the second half of 15th century, bohemia was ruled by Vladislav Jagellon but Moravia and Silesia were ruled by hungarian king Mathias)
In any case, there was Great Moravia in the 9th century, which was an empire by the standards of the time and is also called that by Wiki. By the way, absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita
or written in English Shechpospolita.
But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
ok but nobody cares about that lil shithole of urs honestly
EU4 player here :)
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars all empires that ever have been are a cooperation of smaller duchies or territories. The Holy Roman Empire was no different. England, was a commonwealth or "co-op" between many local lords all vying for regional power, the same was with the Ayubids, the Persians, the Chinese emperor kingdoms.
To claim that an empire is ever anything more than the willingness of its citizens to continue under the current leadership and laws is and always was inherently incorrect.
There are only 2 reasons wars are fought on a local level, the first, which is the most common in history, is over oppressive laws and leadership oftentimes levying taxes on goods or even confiscation causing mass starvation in the name of a foreign attempt at conquest. The second is over rights to land, status, and title, still very common but less common that foreign intervention as most titular conflicts were snuffed out before conflicts arose by the ruling power at the time in each respective government.
As for your translation about the Polish - Lithuanian Commonwealth, I'm unsure how you can claim it is translated incorrectly. You yourself translated it into the very words or prefixes within the title you claimed was incorrect so perhaps site where the true name came from to source its genesis instead of arguing over the translation.
@@christianjohns8352 Such nonsense, as if in real empires the regions were constantly at war and there was in this empires no central power as was the case in the Holy Roman Realm. By definition, an empire is usually a very large in terms of area multi-ethnic state with a strong central power and with political and military dominion of one ethnic group. The Holy Roman Realm wasn't all that, because it wasn't even a state and certainly not an empire. That was just a patchwork of territories consisting of hundreds of smaller sub-units of principalities, bailiwicks, margraviates, lordships, free cities, baronies, duchies and even simple counties and bishoprics and other territories. A complex of territories without a generally recognized central authority! That were all German small states. This all German small states were actually permanently at war with each other, so that a unified could not arise! 1000 years they killed each other. Ridiculous to call something like that an empire!
Damn....... The third version is always the best :)
@metal flames there has never been a vlaho Bulgar
@metal flames Maybe in Romania, but not in the other parts of the World.
bulgarian khanate is turkic
Germany?
okay this is weird every where i go i see u in the comments lol
but i love ur content keep it up 👍
Everyone's talking about Rome but no ones going to mention that Crete lasted 1500 years
Well, there was nothing around
Impressive, we found tthe OG
or how Portugal's borders haven't changed for almost 1000 years. ?
VIVA ROMAE IMPERIVM DACIAE PHOENIX VIVAT 🇮🇹🇹🇩🇫🇷🇪🇸🇵🇹
Dacia #2 stronger country
East rome + west rome + europe union< Huns Attila 😉🥋
@@HusticeBoxer23 Huns
@@Bracus.Reghusk moghol and turk is brother
Nö
Man 10/10! Svaka cast matori.
The quality is incredible,so detailed. Predobri ste
8:21 The Mongol Empire joined the server
:P
havker he teleported
Hungary: Hold my goulasch
The Roman empire alone takes two minutes 👌
think of all the Latin being pump in Europe leading to the romance languages, the most beautiful in the world
It actually lasts until 9:15
Good video!!!
11:19 Best plot twist ever
No.
Laugh in Napoleon
Glad to see you added the Spanish kingdoms disappear after the French kings took over Spain. Even after the Spanish unification in the 15th century, the small kingdoms that made up Spain kept existing until the 1700s
and in a strange way it makes you respect Portugal even more. i'm curious if any of the separatists movements in Spain have reverence for the Portuguese. ?
Good job. One mistake. After 1990 it is not Macedonia northern Greece, because Macedonia is Greece. This is Vardarska Slav.
Everything presented here is fake news.
The best historical timelaps video ever seen. Thanks for video! So nice...
That is not the best historical timelaps video because absolutely negative is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita or written in English Shechpospolita.
But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars Interesujace nigdy niewidzialem zeby ktos uzywal term 'Polish Empire' zamiast 'Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth'. Tylko znam jedna ksiazke z tytulem 'Polskie Imperium' ale jej jeszcze nieprzaeczytalem
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 Już czytałem o 'Polish Empir! Ale masz rację, to jest rzadko! Ale Polacy powinni z dumą mówić o 'Polish Empir i nie posługiwać się absurdalnym Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Niestety RUclips nie akceptuje linku, w którym można przeczytać o Polish Empir. Ale jeśli wygooglujesz: "The Empire of Poland and the Baltic Nations" możesz znaleźć link! Cytat: Tytuł: "The Empire of Poland and the
Baltic Nations! The Empire of Poland, at times, has reached from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea; its territory being important for its position along trade routes in the Baltic Region. Poland’s closest Baltic neighbor (Lithuania), has been a valued ally in the battle for freedom from foreign rule of Sweden, Germany, Russia, Prussia and Austria since 1386. Although the Polish Empire was continually invaded, beginning in 1605, technology and education in Poland remained strong and progressive for the time and "polonization" of the Lithuanian nobility was evident."
@@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 RUclips nie powiadamia o wszystkich odpowiedziach!
No odpowiedziałem ci!
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars RUclips jest okropny jesli chodzi o wyswietlenia komentarzy. Juz pojde czytac o tym, jak masz jakies inne rekomendacje to chentnie sie popatrze
Founding of Rome: 0:08
Roman Republic: 1:08
Roman Empire: 3:08
Rome falls: 5:14
Constantinople falls: 9:18
The Romans have lasted over 9 minutes. 8 if you only count the Republic and Empire.
The Moldavian history is a bit inaccurate but the rest was so good! Can’t imagine how long this took you! Good job!
Switzerland coming in 1802 I think: wasup
Switzerland: ima get some popcorn and see this evolution rn
Roman Empire is so admirable 😢
Where is Sealand tho?
IKR!
Ikr
Yeah!
Yea were is my glorious nation
New sealand?
Bravo! Good job!
A mistake, the Golden Horde became the Great Horde before 1444, at least according to Eu4
Great Horder never exists
Eu4 players be like:
1444 *STOP THE VIDEO*
Timur destroying
why is Francia keeps falling down? 5:22-5:34
additional (edit): a province named 'Vladimir'
*inserts Russian anthem* 8:17
At that time (it was the 1st dynasty) the laws of inheritance was about dividing your possessions to all of your sons equally. That's why untill 987(1st king of the third dynasty, the "Capetiens"), every king divided their kingdom to give each of their sons a part, and then each son will divid theirs to give their sons...etc (hope i'm clear ^^)
One thing important to notice is that, despite the division into several parts, all Frankish heirs considered their respective kingdoms as part of the same realm : Francia. This is why it wasn’t so difficult to reunite it regularly. Everything changed in the tenth century when the Carolingians lost their power.
That's one of the downside of this version: he didn't really show the cultural links between the different entities. Even while divided, it was still Francia, but ruled by different people.
Way later, he also misrepresented the Angevin empire a bit for a more or less similar reason.
But to be fair, it's hard to be representative of the political context of Europe throughout history in a simple map, since things were sometimes very subtle. I really like Ollie Bye's work regarding that, you should look up that channel.
Where is Kosovo on your map? Established in 2008? Seems implausible considering your website is called BALKAN HISTORY! Is Kosovo not a part of Balkan history?
Ah yes, the Kosovo and Metohia, the Holy place of Serbia. Of course It's a part of Balkan history. Wdym?
Just a few mistakes that almost everyone gets wrong about Bulgaria.
1. Old Great Bulgaria was the largest state created by a group of many tribes who walked on many lands and created many empires and states. OG Bulgaria in modern Ukraine was the largest they created under the name Bulgaria. The state was just a few numbers shy from reaching 1,000 000 square kilometers.
2. The sheer size and position was the reason why Old Great Bulgaria fell to the turks. The state got so big in such a short amount of time that defending it against the never ending attacks from the neighboring turkic states became a task too big so the sons of Kubrat decided to seek their fortune elsewhere.
3. The territories of Danube Bulgaria were a continuation of Old Great Bulgaria. Asparuh did not move his father's state on the Balkans he just concentrated the tribes he inherited plus what he could salvage from OG Bulgaria around the Danube river. While smaller and sparsely populated Asparuh's Bulgaria was better positioned and proved a challenge for the Khazars the Avars and even the Roman themselves who were paying tribute to him.
4. The Bulgarian empire did not loose territories to the Magyars quite the opposite. Simeon the Great ultimately defeated them which forced them to move in the Bulgarian territories in Pannonia. Those territories were lost just like most of Bulgaria when the Rus and the Romans simultaneously attacked Bulgaria. Our empire fell apart. The Romans tricked the Rus and toke control of the Danube for a short period.
I wish at least some of this was taken in to account or at the very least the Pannonian part is but for some reason the Bulgarian empire always ends up as the loosing side despite the victory against said foe. Whoever heard of an empire giving away it's territories to the side that suffered defeat? Unprecedented imo.
Take back your frickin native land
go back to asia you mongobulgar
bulgarian detected, Basil II deployed
Can't imagine what gave me away. Basil was his western name around here in the lands he was known to rule over he was known as Vasilii. Anyway it's a misconception that Bulgarians lived poorly during his reign quite the contrary in fact. It was his successors who messed up. If they all treated us the same as Vasilii II the movement that lead to the creation of the second Bulgarian empire would not have happened. But by some miracle if you happen to find a single Roman let him come. A Bulgarian is not a Bulgarian if he can't handle 2 to 3 Romans at the same time.
Also a absolutely negative mistake is that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita
or written in English Shechpospolita.
But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
This was the best history related video I've ever seen,however a slight problem is that in 2008 Kosovo got independent
it did not become independent
I love your videos that you make lol.
This is awesome. I can't imagine how much work went into this what amazes me is that until in the late 1800s there were tons of little Nations or countries. But after that the country's seem to get a lot bigger. Why was this?
they went from small states controlled by decentralised emperors to proper nation-states led by ideologies which required centralised states
nationalism
Something something industrial revolution?
"I LOVE BEIN' PURPLE!"
-Europe for about 500 years
8:26 what if Russia is a descendant of the Mongols, and not of Kievan Rus? The borders are suspiciously similar...
Learn history
U'll find the answer there
@@thenewparallel, it's joke
@@laser3453 😶oopps
Sorry man
not even close, Golden Horde expandes further to the south while Russia is mostly in the north and at some point were vassal state of Golden Horde
Świetne
Doskonale
I could study this work all day long. Thank you S&F
I love how the eastern Roman Empire still calls itself that for like 5 years before realising they don’t have to Rome anymore
They called themselves roman until their end in 1400s. As they had practically transferred all roman laws and edicts to the new city. Byzantine was never a thing until modern historians began to call them this to keep it simple
@@gjergjcamaj5770 No, it was German historians who started calling them that to distance the empire from Rome so that the HRE would look more official in comparison
great job man 😄 even for the other side of the Mediterranean it's correct , just a small correction "Ifriquya " referes to the actual Tunisia, tripolitania and a very small part of the eastern actual Algeria but not the whole of North Africa.
but any way it's a great video . Bravo👍😉
The Ottomans didn't conquer all this part of northern Algeria an other mistake, because there was many berber kingdoms in the south of the Algerian coast
This is fantastic! - although I question the consistency of unrecognized nations at the end. Putting Donetsk and Luhansk but not Kosovo? C’mon brother - I know it hurts lol, and they might not deserve it, but it’s the only way to be consistent here.
Honestly about, nobody cares this.
@@Sergioherorta Most countries would disagree lol
Kosovo is Serbia
@@aleksandarv2207 You either show the de jure borders for everyone or the de facto borders for everyone. Showing Transistria and the DPR & LPR but not Kosovo is massive cope. Be consistent even if it triggers you politically.
I know it hurts that you dont have a albania to niš,podgorica,skopje and leonnina..but its the only way to be consistent here.
wow, i respect you for making the whole HRE
0:08 just clicked in and spotted a mistake . At the 8th century BC , Macedonia consisted of the regions of Istiotida and Edonis ; the borders portrayed in the video are those of the 5th century .
Yes the video does not have perfect borders at all, but at least it represents all if not most states
@@sticlavoda5632 what is the countries in ukraine at the end of the video
Shut up
The Roman Empire lasted a lot of time! Like, nothing changes in the map is just Rome
PAX ROMANA
@@dboytl6679rome, is a latin kingdom. all the idiots you are here i think...
Rome: exists
Objective: survive
That’s the Byzantine’s objective
One of the best history of Europe on a map videos I've seen.
For now the only major error I spotted is Avignon never being Papal
and kosovo
@@xxleomappinggamingxxfirey4429 Kosovo isn’t an error
9:17 - Constantinople, NOOOO!!!!
*Izmir marsi earape plays*
Demokratic President Gültepe
FUCK TURKEY!!! Greece has 3000 years history (unlike turkish, that has only 1000 years), and Anatolia is greek land!
Demokratic President Gültepe
You occupied greek lands and assimilate greek population in Anatolia which now is about 50% of Turkish population!!!!
The Greeks actually did assimilations too to the natives.
Canan Karatay'cı Mapper[CKM]
Keep dreaming, fucking barbarian. You can’t destroy 3000 year civilization...
ОДЛИЧНА РАБОТА!
КОСОВО ЈЕ СРБИЈА 🇷🇸!
Kosova is Kosova not serbia
Косово је Србија
fuck serbia 🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🤛💪kosovo albania usa nato💪
Kosovo is Poland
@4D1 Kosovo is Mr. Poe and Yogul
Are you from Serbia or something like that ?
You gotta love how the Hunnic Empire just barged in like they owned the place 😅 Hungarian here
Worth noting: all those little kingdoms in the boundaries of modern-day Germany were collectively the "Holy Roman Empire"
Se ve algunos fallos.
1. En el principio de la Edad Media aparece "Italia" hasta la conquista de los francos cuando en realidad era el reino Lombardo.
2. Navarra, su nombre inicial era Pamplona, Navarra fue a partir del 1200 y en esa fecha las Vascongadas pasó a ser parte de Castilla y no un siglo más tarde como aquí aparece.
3. El Rosellón fue español hasta mediados del siglo XVII.
Juanma Breda *S O R R Y S I R I D O N T S P E A K D E S P A C I T O*
Hay muchos fallos en este vídeo. A mí me molesta por ejemplo que pongan que España no existía como Estado hasta bien las reformas borbónicas ya en los 1700s. Si fuese así, entonces podríamos separar al Reino Unido en Inglaterra, Escocia, Gales e Irlanda del Norte, ya que son las cuatro naciones que representan ese país y juegan olímpicamente separados. ¿Eso no ponen, verdad? Pero a España si la ponen separada basándose en la Leyenda Negra. Que conste que no soy español, pero si pones a España dividida hasta 1700s, entonces Reino Unido tendría que estar dividida desde 1707, con la Reina Ana.
@@mcveigh1579 Use google translate.
@@mcveigh1579 *Aprende español.*
So apparently you put luhanks and donetsk which havent been recognized by a single country but u didnt put kosovo which was recognized by 60% of world countries
Ako stavi kosovo kao odvojeno mora i republiku srpsku...
Kosovo is inpendent but you forgot Kosovo i know you are serb and hatte US shqiptars but you have e to know that Kosovo excist
We are independent since 2008
@@333sinisa Kosovo je nezavisna drzava, Rs je autonomna provincija, nije nezavisna
This is very simplified. And not precise when it comes to 13th century and Central Europe... Anyway thanks for this video.
good luck making a better one...
*recognizes Luhansk, Donetsk, annexation of Crimea
*doesn't recognize Kosovo
Portuguese borders hasn't changed since 1250.
We are so lazy.
OMFG
I guess Portugal was just left alone
someone forgot the Portugal empire
They technically changed on the 19th century with the lossing of Olivença
america
Portugal was busy conquering the rest of the world
A wondrful effort depicting a complex/complicated event/s ... well done
Greetings from Azerbaijan 🇦🇿❤🖐
love azerbaijan from hungary hunnic brothers🇭🇺❤🇦🇿
Azerbaijan not exist with all the meanings...
I find it strange how you recognise areas such as Donbas and Transnistria but not Kosovo? Is this a matter of personal belief or a different reason??
They hate us 🇦🇱🇦🇱🇦🇱
Косово е Сербия
Amazing!!
Thank you very much!
9:17 Lithuania
Brāļi!
Lithuania :(
My heart broke when Yugoslavia broke up
I moje isto 😢
Everyone's did
My heart broke when Germany broke up after WW2
@Marko Topic I'm not German, I'm British but I love German history lol
@Marko Topic also just so you know, barely any Germans knew about what was going on inside concentration camps. Besides, their reasoning for invading Europe is understandable. As you know, Austria started WW1 but everyone gave Germany the blame. Instead of punishing the people that ran the government during the war, they (the US, the UK and France) decided to make a really harsh treaty that punished all German people regardless of their opinion on the war. The German people were unfairly punished to the extremes. The equivalent of 1 mark soon becamt 1 million marks. Your thinking is basically like punishing someone with ADHD for fidgeting too much. You can't punish a people for what the government did
8:23 Eastern Europe exist
Nobody....
The Mongols: *"Its free real estate"*
the Hungarian Polish Union is missing... This is in time of Matias king
It wasn't Matthias' time , but Louis the first. 1370's
I live in Russia and I really like your videos, as I really love the history of Europe and Russia
Why I did not know before that there is such a channel!? Very cool work.
Great job, but why isn't Kosovo in different shade like Transnistria?
history addict Hold up, he actually shows Transnistria, Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk, but not Kosovo. Wow.
Man the camera man had to time travel to make this video, legend.
this is very interesting. thank you for making this.
No kosovo, malta, scotland, wales, etc? WHY!!? THIS IS PURE GOLD THOUGH
luisqsk
The creator of the video is Serbian, that’s why he didn’t put Kosovo...
sofarluck
Do you even know what you’re talking about? The UN recognized Kosovo and says it’s independent.
Kosovo is not indipendent country for full-size, but anyway, Kosovo is Serbia so :)
Srbija i Republika Srpska
I can already tell that you’re delusional by your profile picture, so I’m not even going to bother arguing with you...
@@RUclipsr-gm9xf Serbia and RS is one country!
This is really good. One thing that's bothering me as a Finn is the shape of Finland 😂
its just a beautiful work
Yeah! Nice video!
A small error in this: as an italian, i can say that Rome isn’t rome, but its the civilization called “Latins”, that then merged with the etruscs
Which is not a small error and absolutely negative that Poland and Lithuania are not shown as a unified state since the Union of Krewo in 1385. Also unfortunately, as almost always, the wrong name for the Polish Empire with Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is used here.Using the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is totally wrong. Because this Polish state was a Polish Empire and the use of Lithuania in the name of the state is nonsensical, as it suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! Besides that the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth based on a mistranslation and is therefore wrong. This term is wrong because the term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is a modern invention in connection with Poland. A nonsensical invention by historians that does not correspond to reality. Moreover, the term is being used incorrectly because the Polish term Rzeczpospolita has been mistranslated as Commonwealth. So the term Commonwealth is used because of an incorrect translation. For that reason alone, one should not use this term. But the term should also not be used because the use of Lithuania in the name suggests a kind of equality that did not exist! The term Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealt was not used at all in earlier times. It would be appropriate to speak of Rzeczpospolita is the traditional and official name of the Polish Empire as a whole, including all duchies and and all ruled territories. The name of the state Rzeczpospolita is a combination of rzecz "thing, matter" and pospolita "common", a calque of the Latin res publica (res "thing" + publica "public, common"), so the republic, incorrectly translated as Commonwealth in English. By the way, in Poland, the word Rzeczpospolita is used exclusively in relation to the Republic of Poland, while other republic is referred to in Polish as "republika". Used in international treaties and diplomacy, the state has been called the most serene ( most high) Rzeczpospolita Poland (Polish: Najjaśniejsza Rzeczpospolita Polska, Latin: Serenissima Res Publica Poloniae or also Rzeczpospolita of the Polish Kingdom or Rzeczpospolita of Poland. Its residents simply referred it in the everyday language as Rzeczpospolita or Poland occasionally also the crown. But the state was never called Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Never!!! If one wants to use a more modern term one can use Polish Empire as also the term Swedish Empire is used. Or the Polish name of the state of Rzeczpospolita
or written in English Shechpospolita.
But it is positive that the so-called Holy Roman Empire is correctly shown as a patchwork of territories and not as a united state as is often done.
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars oh my god you writed a poem
@@Fun4Fan0309 You're exaggerating!
@@GreatPolishWingedHussars nah! XD
@@Fun4Fan0309 Yes! No XD!
Excellent work and difficult. It would have taken too many frames.
I know who youre youre the making mostly balkan countries youre greek I have to say I saw Greece Athens and Selanik Im from Turkey Too smilar also my familie use to live in Selanik "theselaniko" and bulgaria they were Balkan Turks after the Ballan Wars they are living in Istanbul
WW2: *happening*
switzerland: i dont speak war
Respect for person who made this video.This is knowledge of history of all countries showed on the map.
at the end, Crimea is shown as a part of Russian Federation. It is clearly a problem that needs urgent correction.
I like how the few seconds where WW2 happened and hitler was invading had the low pitch evil sound
If you made in 2014 Donetsk and Lugansk as a sovereign states, why you didnt draw Cosovo? And why you didn't re draw territories of Eastern Ukraine?
He is from Serbia
What’s it called when a region has a bunch of small states emerge after a large country collapses? Balkanization doesn’t quite hit the nail on the head, and Feudalism is more of a definition of a hierarchy than a description of multiple states existing. Does anyone know what the phenomenon is called when multiple small states emerge?
I think what you are searching is dissolution, partition, or collapse
In Croatia we call it: liberation
This video is excellent 10/10
10:00
It’s so beautiful!
I do miss those days, the peak of Poland.
Poland AND Lithuania, Poles wouldn't have reached that land without Lithuania
@@Red-jd2uj true but it was mostly Poland.
Especially later on, Lithuania was second to Poland.
10:13 Poor Poland
🫡
@@mangomaster5820 i think it was mostly lihtuania cuz before they had some parts of now Ukraine poland was smaller but I might be wrong
For ONE second at 4:18 I thought it said GALACTIC Empire 😂😂😂
😂😂😂 Oh no, they come for us ! 😂
But i hear GALAXY EMPIRE THA FAQ
wow great video dude, bet that took alot of time!
You forget cycladic civilisation which is Greek 4800
Greece best country in the world
I don’t think he forgot, just didn’t include it.
@@Catani99 k