Juror speaks out after Gwyneth Paltrow is victorious in civil ski crash trial l GMA
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 мар 2023
- Samantha Imrie said the jurors had a “unanimous decision” and she found Paltrow’s testimony to be convincing: “I didn’t feel she had a reason to lie under oath.” gma.abc/3KpaEh2
SUBSCRIBE to ABC News on RUclips: bit.ly/2vZb6yP
Latest updates: abcnews.go.com/
Watch FULL EPISODES on Hulu: abcn.ws/3bzvQQn
#news #gwynethpaltrow #skiing #abcnews #verdict
i don't like GP but now i have respect for her. she didn't settle bc she was right. she countersued for $1 just to prove a point and bc she knew he didn't have millions. class act!
She stuck him for the hefty attorney fees, hopefully that will be a lesson for somebody!
@@harmonograms He insisted on taking this all the way to trial. So him paying attorney's fees just puts her back at the starting line. She wouldn't have attorney's fees if he hadn't sued. Why should she be out hundreds of thousands of dollars when she wasn't at fault?
He's got millions and then some. Did you not watch the trial?
@@RandyLaheySunnyvale not really. it was too boring and ridiculous, so i just watched some bits and pieces. i didn't know he had $$$
You don’t know her. So how can you possibly know if you “like” her or not?
If he had never sued there would be no attorneys fees to pay.
Exactly
Terry brought this all on hisself.
I’m sure he can afford it
@@TheBebe2214 idk I think he went on all those trips after the crash spending alot of money because he assumed he would be winning millions from suing Gwyneth so he probably doesn't have much left now.
@@alisha8586 I agree - I think there be bankruptcy in his future. Gwenyth has said she will donate the money if she wins. I think she won’t pursue. She’s been vindicated and will just move on
@@jamba622 hopefully she'll take that money and get her greenish stringy hair fixed 😂
He had the burden of proof. His evidence was weak. And his sus behavior directly suggested Paltrow's fame was a motivation for his lawsuit. The verdict is unsurprising.
I felt she was in the right from day one, tbh I don’t even think it’s right to sue anyone for an accident on the ski slopes unless it really was wreckless or drunk skiing. Anyone who’s been skiing know people take other people out constantly and he only came at her cause she’s rich but I think what did it for him was all the photos of travelling around the world post accident and his daughters were terrible witnesses
Gwyneth showed her true class at the end when she told him I wish you well.
To be honest....even though I side with Paltrow on the case.
Wishing someone well can be considered a threat.
I doubt very much in this case it is....but it's not a good look.
You can say that again.
Hmm bit patronising
Was hoping she leaned in and said, "keep your dollar bitch" instead
@@jstravelers4094 yes it can sometimes come across as a bit condescending ? ... as in haha ok *I* won and don't ever forget that .. but I hope have a good rest of your life
I'm sure the plaintiffs lawyers convinced him that, this will settle out of court, and never go to full trial and verdict. Glad there were some sensible jurors on that panel.
Absolutely!
She showed class and grace throughout. Telling him she wished him well was classy.
Idk she skied off leaving him broken up and unconscious in the snow. Imo only the worst kind of person would do that.
@@NonprofitWrenchimo you didn't watch the whole court case.
@@NonprofitWrench He slammed into her. He told the resort employee he was fine.
@@kated9914 she stayed to made sure he was ok. Then she left. Terry said he was fine but after finding out it was gwyneth…he made a bigger deal out of it
@@NonprofitWrench If he really was unconscious for 2 minutes as per his friend and witness he should have sued his friend for not doing or saying anything either for that whole time (as per his own testimony) for delaying aid.
Gwyneth Paltrow sued in response, but she only asked for 1 dollar plus court costs. That tells me she acted in good faith. I’m glad she was vindicated. The guy who sued her probably thought he could shake down a movie star with his nuisance lawsuit. He likely figured that she would pay a settlement to get rid of him. Good for Paltrow for refusing to settle.
I think her interview was honest, and as open as you can be without being mean. Unfortunately, like another person said on here, Sanderson is known to sue people when he feels like he’s been wronged and God forbid, he thinks she’s out there slandering him then who knows what may come of it. Overall, I thought that this juror did a good job at getting to the truth of the matter. Thank you for your service ma’am.
Yes and one doesn't know if Sanderson and his lawyers, would use what she or another juror says as grounds for a mistrial. Horrors, the court doesn't need a repeat.
He wont sue anyone again lol or he will, to try to make cash to pay for GP’s attorneys
@@cz2301 They were both out of control skiers, Skate border should hopefully one day run into to both of these idiots.
Jurisdiction would do well not to be interviewed.
I never believed he had a case and this seemed like a cash grab to retire on, but I didn’t know he also had a history of suing other people. What a sleeze.
I am glad she went to trial...she set an example to other would be grifters that this behavior will be challenged and won. Good for you Gwyneth. And to all the people mocking you for clout take a seat and shut up now. mean people.
Agreed
You must have been sniffing her vagina-scented candle. It's affected your brain. You apparently can't comprehend the definition of the word grift. Why don't you go steam your vajayjay and then buy one of her "jade eggs" and shove it,
I find her whole wellness shtick annoying as hell, but looking at this completely objectively: this case was wrong to get this far and I'm glad she won.
None of you really new much about this case i see,……for starters calling him a grifter when he was clearly loaded and was never about the money! 😂 her clean cut image and her media marketing won her this case nothing more!
As usual though, trial by media rather then trial by justice!
@@philwhatever3903 yeah, she looked no better with her greenish stringy hair 😂
I laughed so hard through this trial. This guy was such a snake. Go Gwyneth!
maybe, but her whining about losing half a day of skiing on her expensive holiday felt like a scene straight from The White Lotus.
They are both ridiculous in their own ways. I don’t find either to be good people. He’s a snake, she’s a snake oil saleswoman. Both take advantage of others and have narcissistic qualities. Perfect pair.
Regardless, this lawsuit was one of the most ridiculous lawsuits in history, and the jury got the verdict right. How it was ever even allowed to get to trial is beyond me.
@Daniel D Wow what a little man you are. Commenting without even seeing the trial. Ridiculous.
Are you jealous because she's successful? She's no snake oil salesman, Goop, for better or worse, is a hugely successful company.
This is about a con-man trying to shake down a wealthy person through our court system. He should be put in jail.
This would be such a great skit on SNL.
It seems like Sanderson thought she’s rich and will just settle with a check but with her suing for just $1.00 and attorneys fees shows it’s not about the money but integrity. What really blows my mind are the photos of Sanderson after the accident on trips all over enjoying himself a far cry from his enduring pain from the accident.
@Don KHe only looked like he was having a good time, inside he was suffering 🤣 His lawyer wanted Paltrow to pay him $33/hour for the rest of his life for it.
@@ckp2ator389 the *fact that he asked the lawyer how much this was worth and the lawyer estimated he could get $3 million for this injury* tells you all you need to know about this lawsuit
@@nealskrenes2612 Yes, I remember that came out somewhere in the trial. The TBI (traumatic brain injury) was the lasting injury he was suing for. But that was a somewhat nebulous condition to diagnose. He seemed to be fully functioning in his worldwide travels...reminded me of "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiago" show except substitute Terry Sanderson. The jury made the right verdict.
cheque
@@ckp2ator389 😂
Would an average person be able to defend herself if she was innocent? This is so expensive. I don't feel sorry for the guy who lost the case because he brought this onto himself. But it's really sad when regular people lose everything they ever worked for to defend themselves even when they did nothing wrong.
Not likely someone like Terry would sue an average person. The deep pockets of the defendant have an impact on determining if a lawyer will take the case to court. Also, the majority of these cases are settled out of court and your homeowners insurance will pay for it.
Terry has traveled more than some rich people. Seriously. I don't understand how you think he spent any money. Especially when lawyers say they don't collect unless YOU collect. Idk. He got what he wanted, he got a TV spotlight for 8 days and several press conferences. He's nuts.
When I was really young I was Skiing in Switzerland and crashed into an older women, this American guy came flying up and introduced himself to the older women saying he is a very successful lawyer offering his services to sue me for her broken leg, she stood up perfectly gave me a hand then looked at him and said ''leave us alone you American'' in a Swiss German accent, and we skied away happily ever after.
Yeah, and the fact that Gwyneth was skiing slowly on the bunny hill because she was going at her children’s pace and the guy is a world traveling adventurer who mostly seems to travel to mountains, his being on that slope at all is suspect. Plus saying it was the hardest crash he had ever experienced with a mom skiing slowly on an easy slope and he had to catch up to her and get in her lane in either version.
I don't see your point. Had you truly broken the old lady's leg, it would have been right for you to compensate her.
@@wishingb5859 yeah when I first heard about the case it seemed suspect. GP has a small frame. I didn't follow the trial but I thought if HE ended up in the hospital surely she should have too unless she was wearing Iron Man's suit that day. 😊
I think this is a total fabrication.
*to the older woman
Good that they had a nurse on the jury. His medical “evidence” wasn’t very convincing. I’m a nurse and I didn’t see anything but evidence to the contrary.
Yeah, the list of world adventures that happened in a single year was so long to make his claims laughable.
Plus, he was on the bunny slope with the kids and she was skiing slowly to stay with her kids. They didn't bump heads and he didn't hit a tree. Her back ache sounded real. He is a lifelong adventurer getting permanently injured on the bunny slope.
Congratulations to GP , jury thank you all
It wouldn't surprise me at all if the legal fees that he now has to pay exceed the $300k that he was trying to get ON TOP of the legal fees he already owes his own lawyers... 🤦
Sanderson was the worst witness any attorney could get stuck with....
i thought so too. Sanderson was rambling and verbose. his lawyers were equally inept
The worst was Amber Heard😆
Sad. An innocent man
@@jjsmith4829 He kept adding unnecessary embellishments, e.g., "Deer Run trails are kept up impeccably". That might have connected with a point he was trying to make, but he never made the connection.
If there's money involved, most attorneys will take the case no matter what.
I’m not a fan of Paltrow but I’m glad she won. I became aware of this trial at some point during Sanderson’s friend & dr’s testimony. I especially believed what the dr said of his injuries and how they happened, and was horrified by how they presented the situation & Paltrow’s behavior, that coupled with her facial expressions which I found to be arrogant, cold, and unsympathetic. At that point I was fully on his side. Then I listened to some of her testimony, some of Sanderson’s testimony under cross examination and wow, just wow. It certainly proved to me, once again, the importance of getting both sides before drawing conclusions. My opinion did a 180 and I could see the reason for her expressions. I’m sure they’re both glad it’s over, tho Paltrow must be happier.
Thank you for sharing this - good info for everyone to read and understand how the give and take of testimony helps us to arrive at a certain decision. Seeing the whole picture vs. just one side's perspective.
I think they ran into each other , actually. It was a weird case lol
@@RainingRebecca What was dismaying was the jury questionnaire (the verdict form they had to fill out) did not seem to account for that possibility. Instead it was, was it his fault or her fault, what percentage, and then on to calculate the damages. I think the end result of what they decided was just, since Paltrow was only asking for $1. It was just one of those freak accidents.
Actually the verdict form DID account for the possibility that they ran into each other. You would simply fill in:
50% His Fault,
50% Her Fault.
There was nothing cold, arrogant, or unsympathetic about GP in court. Sanderson and his lawyers tried to extort money from GP based on his buddy, finding out she was a rich celebrity. GP was in fact gracious upon leaving the courthouse, and 'wished him well.' I wouldn't be so gracious with him.
Congratulations to miss paltrow. All this was nothing more than a money grab, a shake down
That's how it appeared to me also, and probably most. The photo's of Sanderson traveling the world and looking healthy after the accident sure damaged his credibility.
And thank god the jury made the correct decision
There are many frivolous lawsuits that would not exist without frivolous lawyers. ADA "violation" lawsuits are very common against mom and pop businesses. The owners tend to settle quickly for around 5k. I am glad she fought and won, she was defending us too.
Terry's round the world trip will have to wait until he bumps into the his next celebrity target
She had unlimited funds, hard to win. Look at OJ with a blood trail from the scene to his bedroom. Same deal.
JUSTICE. HAS BEEN SERVED
I loved watching this trial. Very happy with the outcome.
What’s up with people and the term “his truth”? There’s only one truth. The juror meant HIS PERSPECTIVE. It’s concerning that mainstream people are manipulated into adopting language that is intellectually dishonest. We have to guard against it.
She meant the truth as he saw it. People delude themselves all the time, convince themselves that something happened a certain way when maybe it didn't.
@@ThruAWiderLens But that’s not what she said.
Yes. This started with, "alternate facts."
I don't trust Gwyneth's integrity a dam bit.... but I don't think she was at fault for the ski accident.
Congratulations to Gwyneth Paltrow!
I always thought Gwyneth comes off as quite smug, and I saw flashes of that at the beginning of the trial. However, it was obvious that she was telling the truth throughout and her demeanor when the verdict was given, plus her having the graciousness to wish Terry well, has changed my opinion of her forever. She obviously is someone capable of great empathy even when the other person has tried to damage her.
I'm not a Gwyneth Paltrow fan & I believed her especially when they showed him traveling after accident
Yeah and I honestly think he crashed into her on purpose. He is an elderly-ish man and there were so many mountains listed on his world travels and he chose to go on the bunny hill with the moms and young kids and instructors. I think he saw her a followed her.
Paltrow's attorneys fees will likely be significant. Money that would have gone to his kids now goes to strangers.
They will have enough if not they can do like most people do get a job!
She might forgive him those fees in return for not appealing the case and an NDA. But Terry seems the kind of guy that WANTS to talk to reporters. His attorney was doing his best to pull him away from them, post trial.
“Thank you, DEAR?” jeez….
I agree.
I knew straight off when I saw her, she was doing it for integrity! A woman with morals values and honour. Absolutely brilliant👏👏👏
Polar opposite of Biden, Bragg, Clinton, Obuslim, ..all democrats have no honor or integrity.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
In today's age!? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@ShekelCollecter-ce2fz 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Gwyneth Paltrow? Integrity and morals? Wow lol
Tell a truth that wasn’t his truth? Why not just say he was lying?
That sounded so dumb. She meant he presented his perspective.
@@genxx2724 it did sound dumb!
I think that it seems to a lot of people that he may have dementia and that this may have made it hard for him to know the truth, or easy for him to be lied to by people around him. On the other hand, she may just be trying to avoid getting sued by him for slander, since we all know he likes to sue.
I think she felt bad for him and was trying to be nice. But it seems like he is deceitful and narcissistic and could benefit from a good therapist.
Because Sanderson appears to truly believe his own story. I think in his mind he genuinely believe GP is responsible
Sounds like a good juror. She had no set opinion, as she said she switched sides multiple times during the trial. Also, the juror's nursing background probably helped Paltrow's side as she could assess better Sanderson's pre-existing conditions, collision aftermath and all the activities he was able to enjoy in the 7 years since
Doubt it
I bet jurors are switching their sides numerous times leading up to the vote. Knowing what's at stake, I'd be second-guessing myself constantly, hoping to get it right, erroring on the side of justice, etc..
Juror was star struck that she said GP had to always tell the truth really! 4:24 and she a woke style person she used the terms “his truth” that’s woke terminology. So telling!
@@nmstan3619 I agree, they take an oath to be unbiassed and I would think most take it seriously. I almost was on a jury (made it to the voir dire stage) and you were constantly told of the civic duty you were performing, and the requirements.
@@meishamom7298it was just a nice way of saying that he was lying
"I wish you well" is probably code for something else... lol
I wish you well = get mental help buddy, you need it.
it wasn’t a sincere exchange imho.
It's a gracious thing for her to say. And maybe it'll encourage Sanderson to drop it now.
She was just being polite - shows a good upbringing which we did not see in Sanderson's daughters who seemed rather nasty and more than willing to lie for their father's pathetic law suit. Especially the second one - Lea? She was very nasty and dragged her feet in answering Owens' questions continuously asking him to repeat questions just to be more difficult and try to frustrate him. In the meantime, she made herself and by extension, her father, look bad.
@@marymagdalene3004 I've always liked Paltrow's mother (actress Blythe Danner) the times she's been interviewed. Paltrow may be disliked by many in the general public due to a perception of snootiness but she had good parents and an intact family unit.
People using the phrase “his truth” or “her truth” is getting on my nerves.
agree. Who started that? It's a stupid phrase.
@@creativegirl9710 ..it seems to have become popular since Harry and Megain used it
It started with the "alternate facts" comment.
There should be criminal consequences for false allegations. Jail time.
I don't necessarily believe he thought he was lying. I think he had people around him telling rooting for him to go after the case, and that he thought he had a legitimate chance. Though he lost, I don't think he was necessarily lying.
She would have to press charges
Losing a case isn't a judgment of "lying".
@@C.Church you're talking to people that now lock up their political enemies bro sorry 🤣🤙
Sure start with the Me Too Movement 🤣🤙
I really wish I could understand why this has been such a big deal
Because she's a no better than us celebrity.
Personally I think it was partly because so many people have a real toxic obsession with hating her. They just wanted to see her suffer.
I, and a lot of fellow attorneys, tuned in without much interest. Then we saw the worst opening statements ever-for me, in 35 years. We became riveted to the train wreck of lawyering. They all improved by the end after a horribly wobbly start.
Worst. Lawsuit. Ever
Loved the closing statements by the defense!!!
sometimes a horrible accident is just a horrible accident
I don't buy it in this case. First off they were on the bunny hill with the kids and instructors and she was going slower to monitor her kids. He is going to say a slow bunny hill crash was the hardest crash he ever experienced and he is an experienced world adventurer. His version means he had to start from behind her, catch her, pass her, get into her lane (and she was hugging the edge of the slope away from everybody) then somehow she is going to catch him again at the slow speed and hit him from behind him. Mom's don't speed up. People who have skied all of their lives don't hang out on the bunny hill. They would communicate that they wanted to pass and mom and kids would let them pass.
I think she is a very famous sex symbol and he wanted to follow her.
Where can I get my “ Live like Terry” t shirt?
I don't know why it makes me so happy but... so many people watching live were complaining that the snow sports biomechanical physicist was "too nerdy" and "too much math" and tuning him out just because of the math -- I feel vindicated in that I thought he was by far the most compelling witness. Like a good scientist he followed both hypotheses with error, used the right equations, used the right expertise, and even though his drawing were super basic, they were SO easy to follow. Now granted I took PhD courses in stats, etc... but hell, if I had HIM for my undergrad calc physics, I might have a totally different career because he was amazing. I also loved that he had error ranges instead of an exact answer which is the only answer a person could reasonably have.
Hooray for math, physics, and good natured teachers. You can always tell the brightest ones because they can explain even complicated stuff to just about everyone... except opposing counsel hahahaha.
The equations had me lost for sure lol. However the stick figure drawings saved the day imo.
Also, as you said, the fact he didn't lock into only one possible way this could have happened gave him a lot of credibility.
@@todddepue681 It's cool hearing from someone who isn't a math nerd too because I had a feeling like -- "Oh surely even non-nerds can understand this guy if they try, even if not the equations". I think the equation stuff was just like -- not the most helpful for the jury but requisite to cover with the other guy just using the wrong equations.
Not sure if you watched when they brought the other physicist back at the very end of trial as their FINAL witness (which to me personally even though I like math, I thought was -- wow seriously, you're going to bring your fail physicist on to fight the ski physicist??!), just kinda showed that experience as an attorney in years does not make someone have good judgment LOL.
The saddest part about that plaintiff final rebuttal testimony was that their "expert" essentially called Terry a liar? "No there's no possible way he left the ground". Not sure if the folks at home caught that either since TS said he literally flew up in the air.
@Sheila Kay 100%! I work in fashion, and although I've reluctantly picked up some basic retail math over the years, that's about the extent of it for me lol.
Show me a sketch and now we're getting somewhere!
That final witness they recalled and had to talk to over the phone...big fail!
I watched the trial on RUclips with Emily D Baker. She's a fabulous legal analyst/commentator who gets you through the boring stuff and makes sure you catch the "little things" along the way, which are really important.
@@todddepue681 I know! And the sad part was that the phone part was awful too, but it was all just fail from every angle. It was like, we can't get visuals to work, a connection to work, we're wasting everyone's time, he's explaining why his math is great -- but of course the plaintiff is a liar! I was just like... what? what? Why did they call him? I seriously thought they would try to do some, like ANY cleanup over all the trip photos or something. Like oh, the jury just saw that in the few years after his "life altering TBI / concussion" that he flew, went ziplining, went scuba diving (and he's so fragile and a lot of people know that international flights and scuba are serious brain injury stroke risks, but oh let's ignore that too) -- but like this super suffering guy has more photos of traveling the world in those few years than potentially the entire 8 people on the jury have combined LOL. I mean I'm not saying people in utah can't travel but I was like... I've traveled a lot and that guy makes me look like a homebody! I thought they might do something, like anything to emphasize in detail that it was hard or something other than that Jenny complained - the Jenny who didn't testify and who never got along with him. And oh here's a photo of you broken hearted from losing the love of your life with another hot young woman right after. And again no judgment, but it seemed a bit dubious to show a guy "suffering greatly" who at 76 was doing more than a lot of people at 60. And he's got 90 devastating life threatening health conditions... but he's going to live another 10 years so 3.2 million dollars... okay.
I was just kinda imagining that if the jury reflects a "normal" population of people from this day and age - yes I guess some travel a lot, but damn, for a super devastated guy I was like WTF was he living like a young Keith Richards prior to this?? I mean he lives in Utah so is he just in that small percent missing the lines of coke and playboy mansion or what? (I'm a Midwesterner though, so I guess we're famous for thinking this stuff is .... grandiose. Even our medical doctors here are like humble people in t-shirts and jeans).
Anyway, thanks for sharing your perspective - and very cool. Yeah I'm very familiar with EDB. She runs a great community and manages to also keep people entertained all day. Personally I wish she were doing all these interviews LOL - she's the most fun.
@Sheila Kay Team Terry seemed to have decided that the "stick figure" scientist was the most damning testimony they needed to try and rebut. (Rightly so, according to this juror) But as you said, it failed in every way.
The pictures were tough to come back from and just couldn't be explained away effectively. At points, Terry almost seemed to be enjoying the jaunt down memory lane lol.
GP's lawyer Owens had his faults but honestly, once he was on a tight clock, he did markedly better! (Relatable!) Maybe they should have a set a daily time limit for him 😉
His net worth is $500,000. Hope that is enough to pay his and her lawyer fees.
If my net with was $500K, I wouldn’t be traveling the world and skiing at pricey resorts every day. Her fees and costs are going to be a major hit.
each side used 4 attorneys who were visibly in the court room….well attorneys and paralegals at least.
7 years of fees….
Congratulations Gwyneth!
Absolutely!
Are people not allowed to say “lie” anymore? 😂
Lol "he did not intend to tell a truth that wasn't his truth" WTF does that mean?? He did not intend to lie??
I think she meant that he really believed what he said and didn't lie. Delusional perhaps?
To me, it seemed like he really believed what he was saying. He even implied he had developed multiple personalities due to the accident. Delusional doesn't even begin to cover what I think of him...
It's unnecessary to accuse him of lying.
You don't accuse a sue-happy person of lying.
It is strange that juror was swayed by Paltrow's testimony and not the accident report by the ski instructor which stated Sanderson hit Paltrow.
That was submitted by his obese friend as an eyewitness, Craig Romone, who was obviously a lying POS fraudster.
I was convinced soon as I saw her in court and then her testimony. She was being how I would be, frustrated and p*ssed off at this worm who has had her in litigation for 7 yrs!!!! But the physics guy totally sold it he knew all about biomechanics
? both say the same thing…..
@@SnowDaulphin Ramone and Sanderson were con artists. No one believed them, not the ski patrol, not the ski instructors, and ultimately not the jury. They need to take these two crooks to court for fraud!.
So clear Paltrow innocent and harassed for 7 years. All that travel after accident. Sanderson shady answering questions. Paltrow very clear. He is 76 yo. Aging. Traveling the world not injured.
Looks like he needed that 3 Mil to help fund his travels, eh?
Spending his MONEY
To be fair, if somebody travels it doesn't mean they have no TBI. In fact, it is recommended to travel more, to have novel experiences, as it helps to heal the brain.
But it really depends on the type of injury. TBI is extremely easy to get. You can literally just hit your head on a cupboard and be in a state for a month or even years where you'll barely want to live and get out of the house or even bed, let alone travel.
Or you can get hit in the head regularly during boxing and only get more compulsive over time, with all other faculties intact, or just have a bit more slurred speech, but function well. It's very hard to predict.
@@joech1065 He travelled & performed extreme sports. If someone needed that much help like suggested how did they still scuba dive, zipline, climb a mountain & ski again? Not the same picture painted is the issue. Also any of those extreme exercises afterward he could have hit his head underwater too it's very diff from the recluse looking out my window story he gave.
@@joech1065 No, if you have concussive effects you have concussive effects. He looked like he was really having fun on his trips not like someone suffering with TBI would act. He was all about fraud. They need to take him to court for fraud.
Reporting on Sandesons ask is incorrect. In both opening and closing statements he was suing for $3millon not $300k
Can we all stop the "his truth/her truth/my truth" thing? It's getting to the point that words mean absolute nothing anymore.
I have always liked her. So happily for her victory
She's beautiful and classy
@@PK-gi2qh I loved her in the movie Mortdecai. Subtle dry humor
Justice for Gwyneth and Justice for Johnny Depp... Fame shouldn't have to manage grifters
Yeah, even the Marilyn Manson hoaxers. There have been so many hoaxes that it is just terrible.
Excellent overview.
Awesome 👏🏻
Good for Paltrow! She is honest and has immense levels of integrity. That guy is a slimeball!
Yes, his social media posts showing not only extensive travel, but also thrill seeking highly physical activities that he continued to engage in, dispelled any and all claims that he was in any way disabled from the incident. Also his pre-accident, medical records from the VA, with the diagnostics of his pre-existing brain disorders. There was no findings of any changes or damage after the incident. He saw a cash cow and he tried to milk it, plain and simple.
I think he ran into her on purpose. I say it because when they listed his activities and all of the serious mountains he went to, what are the chances that he is going to go on the bunny hill with the children and mothers and instructors? Plus, he had to be skiing fast enough to catch her and pass her and then slow down enough to get hit by a woman skiing at the pace of young children who are with instructors?
I think it is worse than just being a money grabber. I think he wanted to touch a famous sex symbol.
Never been a follower of Gwyn but am not a follower of many celebrities. It was very heartwarming of her to extend the olive branch at the end. Someone has to stand up to people who see a source of gaining wealth through a false claim. Good on her. She handled the case with dignity and commitment.
Personally, I think it was a no-brainer. Sanderson clearly lied several times. He claimed he had no “enjoyable” life and had greatly limited function after the crash yet over 60 photos showed just the opposite. There were also claims that he had anger issues after the crash, yet it was proven that he had to go into anger management therapy after his divorce many years before the crash. To me, that’s a slam dunk. When you’ve been shown to blatantly lie about such claim-related significant matters, how could any jury struggle with who’s telling the truth on the stand. I am not a celebrity watcher, nor really care about the bright lights of fame, so the mere fact that the concept of celebrity was used to explain why Sanderson lost the case, in my opinion, is just lame. So glad this farce is over.
Lesson. Not all celebrities will agree to pay when you extort them.
Those photos of him all over the world is what did it.
The logic of "she is on camera so she has to be truthful" does not make much sense as a juror. Biased much?
Ouch! That's gonna hurt the vacation fund, Terry 🤕
What an amazing dude! He was able to turn Gwyneth Paltrow into a sympathetic figure.
Magically turned a narc into the appearance of a decent person.
😆
🙄
So glad the jury saw through Terry’s narcissistic DELUSION!! I lovingly spent the last 7 years of my precious Mom’s life right by her side as she both physically and emotionally had to navigate her way as she experienced the deterioration and loss of many of her faculties due to the cruel disease of dementia. It’s hard for me to have ANY sympathy for Terry as MILLIONS of others have suffered through age related decline or helped their loved ones go through it, without blaming OTHERS and still feeling well enough to travel the world as Terry still did!!
Leisure travel isn't for sick people.
It's grueling!
Yeah, I agree with you. I have brain problems and I looked at him for what type of permanent damage he got on the bunny hill with Gwyneth skiing slowly to keep pace with her children and the instructors and it just didn't make sense to begin with. It bothers me that he, a very experienced skier was on the bunny hill with her and came from behind her. I think she was intentionally molested and doesn't know it.
@@jstravelers4094And, when I was in my 20s, I traveled for a whole Summer and you are right the kind of traveling he was going was utterly grueling. And if his brain wasn't processing he would have had problems.
@@wishingb5859 When I was in my twenties, I started to come down with the flu, as I was traveling home from a business trip.
I thought I was gonna die.
My point is that I would never choose to fly on a long recreational trip if I wasn't feeling 100% healthy.
A brain injury and flying on pressurized airliners????
Not a chance!!!
Well said…
Why is this juror speaking on a public forum? What purpose does it serve? Jury Deliberations should never constitute Breaking News.
Well told 👏 👏
"She's always in the spotlight so she *always* has to be honest!" 😳😳😳 (Goop should make this ditz their next spokesperson.)
I know, right? Man our justice system is a joke. Not saying the case should be one way or the other I just wouldn't want this idiot to be on any jury deciding my fate... Especially if the person on the other side is famous.
yeah, that snippet she said was like you sure are naive young lady.
money won that's all
Sandy’s Dream Team? More like Nightmare Gang. The evidence was overwhelming in favor of GP.
The did a good job, just didn't have much to work with.
Say what you will about Paltrow and her goop, I 100% believe her. The guy was clearly just trying to make some money. His story changed probably a dozen times. All of his witnesses had a different story. He pretty much said that his life ended after the collision... even though he took many physically active vacations after. You can only lie so many times before people stop believing you.
"She's always in the spotlight so she always has to be honest." That makes 0 sense, sometimes maybe it's better not to speak.
I think the bad strategy was to initially paint him as a broken man, unable to live his prior life style,,,, maybe he should have deleted his Fb account prior to the trial 🤪🤪🤪.
He was so in love with seeing his images on screen that, IMO, would have been impossible for him to delete those pictures.
@@marymagdalene3004 Yup, just like the Jan 6th clowns. Most of them were caught because of their FB postings....
@@marymagdalene3004 Yeah, he was really enjoying himself, he was unable to see how bad all the pictures made him look!
He sought over 3 million not 300 thousand. Attorney’s fees have not yet been awarded by the judge. Do some research before reporting misinformation.
Why tf was this televised
And I started out thinking that this guy was a victim.
But traveling the world after the accident AND suffering brain damage????
Nah. The guy is fine.
He's just not honest.
_'I wish you well'_ she has class
part of her goop advice
It’s wounding, narcissists favourite tactic.
she has class when the cameras are rolling anyway
Patronizing at best.
@@MultiPetercool What would you suggest she have said or done as she passed him?
Yay Gwen!!!!!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Wasn’t there a picture?
He should have left it alone because now it's really gonna cost him. $$$$
He has plenty of it
Lots of good things came out from this trial. Foremost, the Jefferson's ideal of "Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness" is still alive and vibrant. Time to upgrade skiing skills. To pursue happiness.
This is what the inability to think critically looks like. And she is a voter. Heaven help us.
I thought the Judge hadn't determined that yet.
This was good for GP's reputation.
She came across well.
4:04 “What a thoughtful witness”. ?? Did she mean juror? 🤔
Justice has been served.
Never in doubt
Really enjoyed the live chat on this one!!😂
Imagine if we could get honest, common sense jurors and judge for a certain Manhattan case... then we will know if there is truly hope for our justice system.
🎯👏💯
I am happy the jury got this verdict right. Good job jury.
Also, I predict Gwyneth will get a lot of movie rolls because of this win.
I was under the impression she isn't active in acting anymore. Was an excellent actress in her younger days...I'm sure she'd be great if she returned to it.
Absolutely, since there has been a glut of new-age grandma roles that are crying out for someone of her caliber...
@@newhorizon4066 Yes, Diane Keaton, Jane Fonda and Sigourney Weaver come to mind. It'd be interesting to see Paltrow in a mature role.
This plaintiff should be locked up for a classic case of lawsuit abuse... this sort of baloney wastes time money and resources for all of us. Shame on you, Sanderson.
He sought 3.2 million (look at their closing footage They literally laid out the math of 3.2 mil in their closing), and page 6, paragraph 34 of Terry Sanderson's complaint to the court "
As a direct and proximate cause of Gwyneth Paltrow's breach of her duties
of care, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer damages, including both economic and
non-economic damages related to the ski crash in excess of $3,100,000.
"
NOT 300K please get your fact straight!
The 3.2 million lawsuit was dismissed.
@@joyceconnolly1065 Please watch the closing of the trial from yesterday.
CMD
Wrong.
He initially sought $3,000,000. Then it was $300,000 for this trial.
The $3.2 mill was the number that TS's lawyer came up with for non-compensatory damages as a suggestion to the jury that would have been on top of the $300,000 judgement had he won.
@@DesignKoogle page 6 of Terry Sanderson's complaint filed to the court, paragraph 34 "As a direct and proximate cause of Gwyneth Paltrow's breach of her duties
of care, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer damages, including both economic and
non-economic damages related to the ski crash in excess of $3,100,000.
"
@@CreativelyMelodicDiscovery
That was from TS's initial complaint many years ago. In a later complaint that lead to this trial he asked for $300,000.
"Sanderson's original complaint, filed in January 2019, accused Paltrow of having "skied out of control" into Sanderson and "knocking him down hard, knocking him out, and causing a brain injury, four broken ribs and other serious injuries."
In an amended complaint, filed the following month, Sanderson changed the value of damages he sought in the lawsuit from $3.1 million to $300,000.
Paltrow filed a countersuit in February 2019 in which she claimed it was Sanderson who "plowed into her back," delivering a "full 'body blow'" and leaving her "shaken and upset." Ultimately, she said she sustained "relatively minor" injuries.
The award-winning actress and Goop CEO called the lawsuit against her an "attempt to exploit her celebrity and wealth" in her countersuit. She sought "symbolic damages" of $1 "plus her costs and attorneys' fees" for defending herself against "this meritless claim."
abc7ny.com/jury-sides-with-gwyneth-paltrow-in-ski-crash-trial/13055280/#:~:text=In%20an%20amended%20complaint%2C%20filed,from%20%243.1%20million%20to%20%24300%2C000.
Now that is how all celebs should conduct themselves in court and afterwards, a demonstration of true class
Let’s go back to the concept of - if you go skiing you may get hurt and you cannot sue over it.
The jury verdict read in court DID NOT mention paying the legal fees, only the $1. Around half of the news reports say legal fees were awarded, then another 30% say legal fees were NOT awarded, and 20% say the judge will decide.
I watched the trial stream and this news segment was wrong on a couple things: the attorney’s fees were NOT automatically awarded. You can watch the closing arguments and see them mention that or watch the news interview with attorney Van Ormon as she was leaving the courthouse. The judge has to decide and per Utah law that can only be awarded if Paltrow’s side proves Sanderson brought the lawsuit under bad faith - knowing he was lying or didn’t have evidence to prove it was her fault. Second, he wasn’t suing for only $300K. You can watch closing arguments and his attorneys ask the jury for 3 million.
Yet to be determined
Always love to see Jerz on television you can just drip the narcissism out of them
The truth has a habit of painting a clearer picture of the facts while lies obfuscate. This is why Gwyneth won. She was speaking facts not 'her truth' like Mr. Sanderson did. It was also gross that his lawyers tried to paint Gwyneth as being elitist. She might be but she still stuck to the facts.
Sounds like a person with a sound mind, a lot of common sense. Well done!!
1) Attorney’s fees have not been awarded. There will be another hearing to determine this and the judge makes that decision per Utah law only if defense can prove Sanderson brought the lawsuit in bad faith. 2) Sanderson didn’t sue for only $300K. Watch closing arguments. His attorneys clearly ask jury to award 3 MILLION
She's an actress so of course she was convincing.