The Map of Chemistry
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 сен 2024
- The entire field of chemistry summarised in 12mins from simple atoms to the molecules that keep you alive.
#chemistry #DomainOfScience
If you would like to buy a poster of this map, they are available here: www.redbubble....
I have also made a version available for educational use which you can find here: flic.kr/p/UBS4mf
and a widescreen version: flic.kr/p/UNA1LW
Errata and notes:
1. I got the Oxidising Agent and the Reducing Agent the wrong way around! Sodium is the Reducing agent and Chlorine is the Oxidising agent. My confusion was that when a sodium atom looses an electron it becomes oxidised, so in my simple brain, I called it the oxidising agent. That is wrong because the agent that oxidises the sodium is the chlorine atom and so the labels are the wrong way around. Doh!
2. I drew the hydrogen H2 molecule with a double bond but it should be a single bond because they are bonded with a single covalent bond.
3. Where I have drawn carbon dioxide, the carbon should have a double bond to each of the oxygens.
4. Apparently Feynman diagrams are not that useful for theoretical chemistry, so perhaps that wasn't the best choice for the illustration. The feedback in the comments from a real theoretical chemist is "All we deal with is shuffling around electrons, but many many many electrons, so a Feynman diagram would need to be huge but at the same time would be very very repetitive."
5. In analytical chemistry, I should have called it distillation rather than precipitation.
6. My definition of organic chemistry being about ‘life’ is not very good. I should have said that organic chemistry looks at compounds that contain carbon. But there are some compounds in inorganic chemistry that also contain carbon, like carbon dioxide so I guess I'd also have to state that inorganic chemistry is almost everything else.
7. I said that fuels are inorganic chemistry which is misleading when I drew a car next to it. My understanding is that there are inorganic fuels that don't contain carbon, but obviously all the fuels we are familiar with are organic. I thought a picture of a car would tie a few things together elegantly, but it ended up giving the wrong impression. That’s okay, I’m still learning! :D
8. In inorganic chemistry, I should have stated that all natural minerals fall under inorganic chemistry so as not to be misleading, otherwise you might go way thinking that only man-made substances fall under inorganic chemistry which is not true. I said that 'a lot of the inorganic compounds that are studied are man-made' meaning that the cutting edge of research is mostly man-made substances.
9. Apparently water is not the most inflammable substance. I thought it was so that is interesting.
10. In the bonding section, hydrogen bonding and van der waals forces are technically inter molecular forces.
Here are some of the references I used for this video if you’d like to dig a little deeper
en.wikipedia.o...
en.wikipedia.o...
www.uwlax.edu/...
www.khanacadem...
www.cancerques...
Early smelting:
ispatguru.com/e...
Categorisation of reactions
www2.ucdsb.on.c...
Thanks so much to my supporters on Patreon. If you enjoy my videos and would like to help me make more this is the best way and I appreciate it very much. / domainofscience
Frontiers of Space: nobrow.net/shop...
Atomic Adventure: nobrow.net/shop...
Intergalactic Activity Book: nobrow.net/shop...
Solar System App:
Find me on twitter, instagram, and my website:
dominicwalliman...
/ dominicwalliman
/ dominicwalliman
/ dominicwalliman
PhD in physical chemistry here, just wanted to say: Very well done, thank you, I'm glad to see quantum chemistry being included.
Whenever someone mentions quantum chemistry I get PTSD type flash backs about Gaussian distributions.
I respect scientists
props to you for dealing with physical chemistry
I am a biochemistry student and I have PTSD on biochemistry
How can someone talk about physical chemistry without mentioning Kinetics, Quantum and Thermodynamics.
DoS: Water, the least explody or burny thing around.
Alkali Metals: Hold my electron.
That is clever lmao
Hold my *electron*
Let me pour h2so4.
@@radheyvarshney3153 Nah let's mix that with some good ol' HBr
JUST _PLEASE_ HOLD MY *FUCKING* *_ELECTRON_*
Hey thanks for all the feedback everyone. There have been a bunch of great comments keeping me in check when I have got things wrong, and loads of people saying they enjoy this content which is very encouraging. Unfortunately I made a few mistakes, so here are a few clarifications. I have also put these in the description. This list is longer than I would like, so I'm going to try harder on the next videos to get things perfect! Thanks everyone.
1. I got the Oxidising Agent and the Reducing Agent the wrong way around! Sodium is the Reducing agent and Chlorine is the Oxidising agent. My confusion was that when a sodium atom looses an electron it becomes oxidised, so in my simple brain, I called it the oxidising agent. That is wrong because the agent that oxidises the sodium is the chlorine atom and so the labels are the wrong way around. Doh!
2. I drew the hydrogen H2 molecule with a double bond but it should be a single bond because they are bonded with a single covalent bond.
3. Where I have drawn carbon dioxide, the carbon should have a double bond to each of the oxygens.
4. Apparently Feynman diagrams are not that useful for theoretical chemistry, so perhaps that wasn't the best choice for the illustration. The feedback in the comments from a real theoretical chemist is "All we deal with is shuffling around electrons, but many many many electrons, so a Feynman diagram would need to be huge but at the same time would be very very repetitive."
5. In analytical chemistry, I should have called it distillation rather than precipitation.
6. My definition of organic chemistry being about ‘life’ is not very good. I should have said that organic chemistry looks at compounds that contain carbon. But there are some compounds in inorganic chemistry that also contain carbon, like carbon dioxide so I guess I'd also have to state that inorganic chemistry is almost everything else.
7. I said that fuels are inorganic chemistry which is misleading when I drew a car next to it. My understanding is that there are inorganic fuels that don't contain carbon, but obviously all the fuels we are familiar with are organic. I thought a picture of a car would tie a few things together elegantly, but it ended up giving the wrong impression. That’s okay, I’m still learning! :D
8. In inorganic chemistry, I should have stated that all natural minerals fall under inorganic chemistry so as not to be misleading, otherwise you might go way thinking that only man-made substances fall under inorganic chemistry which is not true. I said that 'a lot of the inorganic compounds that are studied are man-made' meaning that the cutting edge of research is mostly man-made substances.
9. Apparently water is not the most inflammable substance. I thought it was so that is interesting.
10. In the bonding section, hydrogen bonding and van der waals forces are technically inter molecular forces.
Calm down master, you'r great ;)
Domain of Science on the topic of the pictures of the compounds, ammonia is also wrong as it has pyramidal geometry and not trigonal planar geometry
edit: the diagrams at 4:15 are also all wrong besides water
Domain of Science please please please tell me the name of software u use to make these drawins and animations.....btw love form India
The best way to describe organic chemistry is the chemistry involving compounds with hydrocarbon structures. All organic compounds are small sites of reactive structures (called functional groups) embedded into a hydrocarbon backbone that gives the molecule structure.
It is also a good idea to point out that each of the different sub fields of chemistry are actually very highly united. As an organic chemist, I will regularly use concepts and techniques from inorganic, analytical, physical, and quantum areas. I don't use biochemistry, but that doesn't mean other organic chemists also don't.
Your comment on fuels would probably more accurately describe rocket fuels. From a quick search, it looks like the vast majority of rocket fuels are salts like nitrates or perchlorates, or liquids like hydrazine or hydrogen peroxide.
Also, I’ve already heard from two different chemistry professors that only are molecules the covalent compounds. This mean that a compound as NaCl isn’t a molecule, but a ionic compound. Therefore, not all types of compounds are molecules.
*I don’t have certain, but I think that molecule is a synonym to covalent compound.
*I’m not fluent in english, thus, I may have commited some gramatical mistakes.
Short answer: periodic table
Long answer: periodic table doing stuff
Shit just got real
I do not mind the long gaps between videos if the quality is this damn high. Keep up you're inspiring work.👍
Yes! We've been waiting for this one! Great video.
:o
I'd make a chemistry joke...
but I wouldn't get a reaction
Francium!
Badumtssss
That's gold
WE...Argon.
na you won't.
5:00 ERROR **** sodium is a reducing agent and chlorine is an oxidizing agent ****
👍 Vote up if you want: 'The Map of Philosophy'
MinionNoMore Yess!
Me too!
Cauchy if you think that it's worth time considering questions that can't be answered scientifically like "how can we know things?" and "what is the right thing to do in an ethically challenging situation?", then you would disagree.
Cauchy You're wrong. Political philosophy, ethical philosophy, logic, science philosophy are just some areas that deeply affect everyone's life. Inside of each there are even more branches, epistemology dealing with definition of knowledge, bioethics and law, metaphysics of ordinary ideologies. To stupidly claim what you said is to attest your own ignorance as self-confirmed intelligence.
But how do you define philosophy as a map?
So, I've got some problems with the explanations in this... but it's not meant for me and I hope this makes children more interested in the concepts 👏🏻
The Map of Biology next!!!!
Bay Siyah Agree but not without appriation of this brilliant chemistry map we already watched here. :)
Physics -> Chemistry -> Biology!!!!! It must be coming up :)
Chemistry>Biology>Neurology >sociology>economics>politics>computer science> virtual reality>reality building.
psychology next!!! Oh wait this channel is called the science domain
Bay Siyah bbborma m.ruclips.net/video/c81F4mM_7zM/видео.html m.ruclips.net/video/c81F4mM_7zM/видео.html m.ruclips.net/video/c81F4mM_7zM/видео.html m.ruclips.net/video/c81F4mM_7zM/видео.html m.ruclips.net/video/c81F4mM_7zM/видео.html
Awesome presentation
Chemistry is very beautiful. Fundamental to the knowledge of the universe !!
Map of computer science next?
This thing up here is very efficient for revising your topics .
see, I have had so much trouble learning in the past because I I don't want to start at the bare minimum and slowly progress to bigger topics, I lose interest too quick. Getting huge outlines so I can see everything and knowing what IM fully getting into gives me the motivation I need to keep learning, Great videos man, please make more
Excellent summary, with one glaring omission: geochemistry. Granted that historically it was rightly lumped together with other specialized applications (astrochemistry, aqueous chemistry...), but in this era our understanding of the cycling of matter between the earth's atmosphere, oceans, lithosphere and biosphere is an existential concern.
all hail chemistry , may the knowledge of the nucleique acide be with you
I love this format of explaining this important but seemingly complex information in a way that provides knowledge in a visually interesting way
Awesome video!
Can we have a "Map of Biology" next?
Mako?
byawluhjee
4:53 Might I correct that Sodium is actually a reducing agent and chlorine an oxidizing agent
I was looking for this comment
Exactly
Exactly
at 4:51, sodium is reducing and chlorine is oxidizing, an oxidizing agent loves to take electrons (like oxygens)
Ciao. Congratulations for the good clear illustrations. I would like to point out an error to you at the minute 4:46 , infact sodium acts as reducing agent and chlorineacts as oxidising agent, an oversight can happen , hallò
Just thought how much this man is hard working 👍👍keep it up
Small complaint, but in the double replacement animation it should’ve been
AB + CD -> AD + CB due to the largely ionic nature of those reactions and how ionic compounds are written.
I absolutely loved the video though, it introduced me to the branches of chemistry which is something I’ve wondered about for a while
these videos are awesome!
Your section on bonding should distinguish between chemical bonds and binding interactions. Covalent, ionic, and metallic bonds result in the formation of new molecules, while hydrogen bonds, van der Waals interactions, and other intermolecular forces (binding interactions) do not change the number of molecules in a sample.
Love what you do. Thank you for making these videos and sharing.
Great videos mate. Never seen anything so comprehensive on any topic let alone a subject like chemistry.
I wish I could have known this video earlier....
thx for making this awesome video
This video is so easy to understand and the animation perfectly illustrates the information. Great work!
Wow amazing THANK YOU SO MUCH for this huge work of simplification you made to make it clear in my mind !
Thank you so much for the Arabic subtitle!~
شكراً جزيلاً ، كان الفديو ممتع ومفيد حقاً !
4:50 sodium is the reducing agent and chlorine is the oxidizer
out standing mind blowing great bro
How about Map of Economics?
So this is where the poster on the wall of my school science corridor comes from.
I'm binge watching your videos especially " the map of..."
Amazing video! , I really love your videos, great work. Just one thing to point out. In the redox reaction , oxidizing and reducing agent are wrong.
The reducing agent is oxidized and oxidizing agent is reduced.
i love these maps you draw,good job
Map of Biology please!
“Your consciousness right now is a function of the chemistry going on in your brain cells.” Now that’s completely unscientific.
I appreciate the style of the video very much
Excellent. Having science domain knowledge maps helps relate all disconnected required course knowledge splattered across textbooks from the 20th century. Your maps clears the air(chemistry, yes) for me. The map of mathematics helped me even though I've learned up to Calculus of Variations. Keep going! Haw about punching down into more subject detail of your existing maps?
1:13 medicines*
I still remember taking p-chem, and how much easier it was after taking physics. (i.e. three+ semesters of calc, basic chem and orgo, and elementary modern physics (quantum realm)) Ok, a lot of prep work, but a fun class.
One mistake Na is reducing agent which oxidises itself and chlorine is oxidizing agent and reduces itself
Thank you very much for your very short video on chemistry.
Woah, dude you're different! I hate the subject but the series is awesome
you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why.
Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?.,
This was an amazing video! Just goes to show how little I know about chemistry and how much I may know! How amazing
Wilson Chan
you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why.
Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?
I'm such a null student specially in chemistry and I watch this video and gained confidence that AT LEAST The basics/ foundation of chemistry is on my fingertips. I know these concepts and terms❤.
Ngl this really boosted my confidence.
Now I'll just watch another general chemistry one shot and then organic chemistry one shots and then start to study my text book.
Well after 4 days I've chemistry 12th exam. Wish me luck🤞.
I'll come back to tell y'all how much I scored from 85/?.
I know it's quite unusual, but may I ask for a Map of Statistics?
please make map of engineering
RUclips gracias por esta grandiosa recomendación!
make one of history
fausto serra The history of History
fausto serra crash course have already done a pretty good job of that.
How do you do a map of history?
Finally the nerdy side of internet
Map of how to get a date.
please help
uh
That is right: "Self-Organization", simple atoms, and molecules, combining to create more complex states, is 100% natural, and universal. No "Sky-God" needed.
you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why.
Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?, ;
Great maps you've made so far. I'd like you to work on a MAP OF EPISTEMOLOGY while I'm working in my own HOLOSCIENCE MAP, which comprises all your maps plus infinitely more like the Science of the Supercodes and the PsychoCosmia within the Cosmogonic Cybernetics as part of the Holoscience... Thanks and cheers bro! You've got a new subscriber...
Thank you so much sir ❤️ .
you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why.
Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?. : ;
Anyone else who studies chemistry here?
This is so amazing!
Huge like for the Minecraft grass block drawing for "Agriculture" :D
taught me more abt chemistry than my 5 science teachers in hsc
you leave on a red cloth table lamp with a regular kind of bulb in the bedroom and an oval tubular vintage bulbed desk lamp on in the office next door. There's 1 lamp in each room. You wait to see which type of bulb burns out first, how long it takes and why.
Would you consider this example to be doing a type of experiment?,
How many exception do yo want...??
Chemistry : Yes
Doing Chemical Engineering…love Chemistry but sometimes I wonder if it loves me
damn rip process chemistry
There is a mistake. H2 and O2 are not compounds. They are molecules. Compounds are made from different atoms, for example H2O is a compound.
Great video, but i belive he didn't mention some fields...
Like chemical engeneering and the area of energy/green energy in chemistry
As a total synthesis guy , good map
اوه والتر يا لك من شخص اسطوري بحق
I love this, it is very pedagogic illustration and big thinks.
It would be wonderful to know who was narrating and their biography. It sounds like Brian Cox.
Uh liked seeing Vanadium Oxide there as the catalyst.
chemistry is the study of matter, but i prefer to see it as the study of change
💟 The best presentation of chemistry! 💟
No one:
Schools: Wanna learn about water for a semester?
for a semester? That's a major right there
Also schools (in Italy): 9th grade: study of earth and water
10th grade: biology
11th grade: chemistry
12th grade: the rest of study of earth
I mean, shouldn’t they be more “ordinated”? Like chemistry first year and then you go to more specific things
@@pasticcinideliziosi1259depends on what kind of high school you go to. I’m at an applied sciences lyceum and we learn chemistry from 10th all the way to 12th grade
Chemistry is about the things that matter.
Nothing you think matters matters - Rick Sanchez
@@vito2320 lols i didn't get that at 1st but just got it XD
@@vito2320 cringe and stale
@@lincolndexter9514 nah...witty and brilliant
Pun intended?
If most Education were like this, the efficiency in content assimiliation would be astronomic.
he's just sad that education is shit, because of which he made a mistake. Not that ironic
+katten elvis your right ...but u have to admit that this video is far more interesting and satisfying than schools/colleges book
This video was fun because it was entertaining. But you can't learn the actual subject matter unless you rigorously study the proper textbook. Improve your personal studying skills in order to assimilate the content better.
A very good example is TMPChem. He does the same thing for quantum chemistry and chemical thermodynamics. He covers exactly the same thing that the textbook does.
IB chemistry covers almost all of this in the span of two years.
Map of Maps
Techno Creeper haha
Techno Creeper that is actually a plausible idea since he could talk about: global map, globes, each countries map, geomorphological maps, religion maps, No 1 death causes/economy/population density maps and a crap ton of others
“The Map of Geography”
Cartography ?
Map of cartography
This guy taught me 12 years of chemistry in just 12 minutes. Legend
Nah, he just touched tips of the icebergs of each topic.
@@dominator2707 iceberg? lmao what
@@pancake9707 thx, I forgot the word for some reason.
He didn't teach you shit stop lying
Watching this made me realize how difficult chemistry is. Physics was actually easier for me.
Definitely agree...I actually watched this video to try to get a better idea of the structure of chemistry as a field because trying to structure the ideas like physics and math isn't working out for me and I am not able to learn the interesting stuff in chem (trying to bridge the gap between quantum mechanics and biomolecules, while actually learning about the various mechanisms, syntheses etc.) without it taking a toll on how I am doing on various exams.
@@jaydenguan4708 You are comparing the frontier of theoretical physics (string theory) with high school chemistry. A more fair comparison would be between the study of chemical reaction networks and mechanisms and biomolecular structure inside a single cell, understanding the kinetics involving complex molecules ab initio (i.e. start with quantum mechanics and build up to kinetics), in general trying to predict the formation of molecules and even heavy elements, and figuring out how to synthesise chemicals for all kinds of practical purposes like medicines, materials etc.
Any question in research chemistry is the literal definition of a hard problem; it's unclear whether a solution even exists and even an attempt to do so has to begin as a shot in the dark. The difficulty of physics is tangible at least and mathematics can be fruitfully used to make immediate progress. In chemistry, the sheer complexity has resulted in the adoption of heuristics rather than a universal mathematical formulation (which is literally computationally intractable; quantum many body problem is exponential) so yeah it's incredibly difficult and a loooot less flashy than String Theory.
As biochemistry undergraduate student, i disagree on you. My results for chemistry is far more higher than physic everytime
In the Universe, physics, chemistry are the same things ksksksks. The distiction is just for us.
@@jaydenguan4708 wow that's like comparing kindergarten math to calculus
Map Of Computer Science
Map Of Quantum Mechanics
Map Of Nuclear Physics
Map Of Engineering
Map Of Philosophy
Great Video By The Way !
I second this, maybe each kind of Engineering especially Electrical an Mechanical. A few others to do:
1. Biology
2. Astrophysics/Cosmology
3. Genetics
4. Psychology
5. Medicine
6. Standard Model of Physics (Our understanding of the basic forces and particles)
7. CERN
8. Evolution
9. Economics
10. Geology.
And other specific disciplines in STEM.
(Edit: 11. A map of the greatest minds in science and their achievements. Basically, the most important contributions to our understanding of nature and reality.
Keep dreaming
Map of Dota please. Kappa.
ruclips.net/video/RXG1h02X5bg/видео.html
Plz watch it's funny
Spark10 STUDIOS not funny
sodium is REDUCING AGENT !!!!
Quite right. At 4:53, sodium is oxidized as it loses an electron (OIL) hence it is the reducing agent.
@Carlos Silva well yeah exactly, they got it wrong in the video
stopped the video and went down looking for this comment to make sure I didn't go crazy thanks!
Yep
I just paused the video and scrolled down to see if somebody had corrected it, thanks
Great video but you got oxidising agent and reducing agent mixed up
Caine ya chlorine was oxidizing agen as it got reduced making sodium oxidized
Caine ye
Caine Yeah, I caught that too.
Darn it! :D Thanks for pointing this out. I'm a dummy.
how? when it gives a elektron away it gets positif charged hence the plus
4:45
In this reaction, Chlorine (Cl) gains an electron and gets reduced so it is oxidising Sodium (Na), therefore it should be oxidising agent and Sodium (Na) vice-versa should be reducing agent.
I think it's the matter of presentation, maybe he means Na+ is an oxidising agent and Cl- is a reducing agent.
@@ansel-0571 yes but thats not correct
Wad searching for this
Excellent. Paused the video at this point myself. Wikipedia also says that the video is not correct. "An oxidizing agent (also known as an oxidant, oxidizer, electron recipient, or electron acceptor) is a substance in a redox chemical reaction that gains or "accepts"/"receives" an electron from a reducing agent (called the reductant, reducer, or electron donor). "
@@AtsAstover what was stated was clearly incorrect; mistakes happens...Overall, very good synopsis. Show this to a class of AP students and see if they can find the error.
Yeah Mr. White. Yeah Science.
"I like to think about chemistry as the study of change"
Rick Sanchez you’re goddamn right
“Ionic bonds. Chapter 6.”
Mr. Walt?
@@kingrobert7246 I agree
@@divypatel1002 Hello, I like your pfp :>
0:14 are you referring to big bang theory?
One thing i liked a lot back when i was being taught some chem, was the Van der Waals bonding. It's the first bond which is really very weak, but has a great impact.
Good stuff!
More of a force than a bond
I think it was also called London forces. But I like that name better.
@@HassanAhmed-rf9xr no London forces are different. They are temporarily formed due to asymmetrical orbitals. They are really week. Van der Waals forces are relatively stronger.
@@vikramaditya6812 Actually, there are London forces and there are dipole - dipole forces (the stronger one). Both these intermolecular forces fall under the collective name - Van der Waals forces
These maps of science really gives me a broad perspective of what I'm studying. THANKS FOR MAKING IT CLEAR🖒🖒🖒
[?]
You forgot nuclear chemistry.
A man walks into a bar and asks for H20.A second man behind him says I'll have H20 too .
THE SECOND MAN DIES
I guess most people who saw this comment didn't get it
@@starktony2665 Ya ur right dude...
I'm here after watching dr. Stone
Me to😂
I'm here because I am currently addicted to chemistry
Me too bro
Hmm...
Computer Science
Biology
Astronomy
Geology
Engineerimg
Theology? :3
Kyle Bennett
Well chemistry falls under physics.
Map of cartography
Very unique suggestion!
Kyle Bennett
Eh, feel it doesnt get enoigh love.
astronomy maybe?
Will John I imagine that map could be made to look pretty epic!
Will John I think astrology have a much more interesting map
monkeyo Archon what is this fake shit
+monkeyo Archon From what I've seen of astrology, it's honestly far from scientific. Because of that, I doubt this channel would make a map of astrology.
Can I say something in my defence?
It was a joke, a bad one ofc, the worse the most likely i am to do it, but still a joke. I know astrology is bullshit this is why i find it funny, nothing more, sry if I give a wrong impresion about myself.
Map of psychology? Pleeeaase.
the agriculture animation 11:00 looks like minecraft logo
I loved the videos about domains of Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics. Could you make a video about domains of Biology? It would be really cool to use in the classroom. :)