Another video from the archive that I’ve added to and corrected and republished so that it is more accurate for the viewers. Many of you will have seen it before, but it was certainly worth republishing to correct the errors. Thank you. To support the channel, I’m on Patreon at www.patreon.com/ancientarchitects
still popping your "p" s. (microphone technique) have you got a popper stopper microphone screen? perhaps adjust microphone position for less percussive response? love your work thanks
Re the bones that went to London. Did they end up in the British Museum? as much of the collection was evacuated before the blitz. It could be possible some survived and have been misplaced/misfiled like so many other items have been.
I think the biggest clue here is that this body was cut into pieces then put back together. The myth of Osiris says that is what happened to him. I definitely think you are on to something here.
In Petrie's original account he even says this 'A noticeable feature was that the penis had been cut off and bandaged separately " Osiris's penis being cut off is also an important feature of that myth.
@@kinshaw3086 his real one but it is said that Isis contructed him a new penis. Since the body is lost we can't determine if the penis found with the mummy was part of the same person or not. It might have even been a fake penis made from plant matter. Petrie noted that the canopic viscera found in Mastaba were actually vegetable constructs designed to resemble organs so perhaps the penis was also a construct. There is no record of testing done on it before it was 'lost' so we may never know.
@@lmonk9517 More likely the fake penis was made from GOLD just like the one Isis made in the myths. That would have been the very first thing tomb robbers would take.
Well THAT kind of bummed me out. Considering what may have been lost when those remains were lost/destroyed evokes the same emotion I get thinking about the library of Alexandria, or the burning of the Mayan codices. And makes me wonder, not for the first time, how "accidental" such losses are.
@@2ndhandjoke , why does it "have to"? They almost certainly didn't have the technology we do now (though I'm sure they also had technology we don't, like acid stone working), that can adapt to and even avert natural disasters.
Yet another amazing video my friend. It’s work like this, with such brilliant hypothesis put forth, along with such compelling examples of evidence to back it up that make your channel my favourite to watch on the internet. You make learning fun and exciting...makes me think, if teachers were more like you back when I was in school, I may have taken a drastically different path, for the better!! Thanks Matt, for all your hard work, and I can’t wait for the next one!!!
I love how you get back at yer former episodes for more detail or change in perception , learning curve. That's where Nat geo and sorts go wrong. They just repeat the same old same old. Thnx
Some of this had a very non-Egyptian vibe to it, and I am reminded that I read somewhere long ago that Ausar and Auset (Osiris and Isis are the Greek versions) may not be entirely Egyptian names. The fake eyeballs remind me of the plastered skulls found in PPNB sites across the Levant, most famously at Jericho. With this in mind, the presence of a possible vulture skull becomes particularly significant because Andjety was known as the 'Bull of Vultures'. This is significant because Catal Huyuk pre-dates Dynastic Egypt by several thousand years, and it is filled with representations of headless corpses undergoing excarnation by vulture on the walls of structures decorated with both real and sculpted bull skulls, as well as the occasional picture of a man with an erection. Removing the head, before giving the body to vultures, ensures that it remains somewhat intact for later reconstruction. Now that I think about it, Osiris is never depicted as fully mummified - only his lower body is mummified while his face is always there... and it's decidedly green. All of the pieces seem to be there connecting Osiris-Andjety with Pre-Pottery Neolithic practices in the Levant thousands of years before anyone thought to unify Egypt... and that's not even taking the spread of agriculture into account (Osiris is not just associated with mummification but also with fertile fields and sprouting crops).
This is just fascinating. I believe you are correct about Mastaba 17. Everything that was found with the body supports your hypothesis. This person may have been one of the original pyramid builders. The ancient god that later became Osiris was probably an unknown Pharaoh. This thought definitely opens other possibilities. What a great presentation Matt. Thank you so much!
ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC once again !!! I LOVE the longer video with you taking us back to a lost time. Thank's for all you do, GREAT WORK !!!!!!!!!!!!! 👍👍👍 SEE YOU WHEN I'M LOOKING AT YOU !
Amazing work sir!! Excellent research, hypotheses/theories, presentation and narration, as always, very impressive dude. Love it!! Keep it up man!! BIG UP YOURSELF MY DAWG!!!!
I am thinking the summary 1. Maybe Andjety was a real historical figure of a local ruler with some knowledge of irrigation, probably learnt from Mesopotamian, which is why he was able to drained the delta marshes and converting it to arable fields. 2. Due to his merit or abilities of draining the marshes, Andjety was apotheosized or deified as national-patron god of his state after his death. 3. Unfortunately, his city-state in Lower Egypt occupied by Upper Egypt force who considered Osiris as their patron god. As the result of being the ruled one, the importance of Andjety degenerated to local small god and being forgotten during the river of history. Do u think this Andjety learnt the irrigation knowledge from Mesopotamians or assisted by irrigation experts from Mesopotamia?
Ancient architects, I LOVE your channel! Could we get another video about the Napta Playa structure? Who created it and how they were the first ones to occupy the Nile valley? How about another video on the land of Punt and how we’ve found it’s location. WHY did the ancient Egyptians believe it was the land of their ancestors, and land of the gods? or what about the Uan Muhuggiag mummy, how it is the OLDEST mummy in Africa. What he looked like and the implications of that?
Brilliant detective work here. I have a thought on the multiple pyramids by one Pharoh thesis. Perhaps he started his tomb elsewhere (Bent Pyramid?), then stumbled upon this Mastaba. Upon realizing who was buried there, Sneferu decided to build a new burial place for himself near this tomb of Osiris. Of course this supposes the Meidum Pyramid was for burial.
When you mentioned the remains I was waiting for "they got lost". Sure enough. When looked at case by case these things can happen. During war time, sure a lot of things get destroyed. However there is such a clear pattern when it comes to finds that can be considered anomalies, those that could have upset the carefully constructed timeline. They all go missing.
I don't buy that they were destroyed in the blitz. It is well documented that the British museum moved all of their collection deep underground before the bombing started so if it was moved there then it would be safe from bombings. The source under this video isn't clear where about in London it was moved to but since it was discovered by Petrie it was probably in his collection, which was also moved out of london....... So unless it was carelessly left behind (seems unlikely) or it was sold into a private collection (not really Petrie's style) I should think that it may still be in existence somewhere.
Dismembered and reassembled is, of course the story of Osiris. Maybe it was! The remains are ALWAYS missing or ACCIDENTALLY destroyed. Somebody REALLY does not want us to know our true history.
Matt, instead of saying "I believe that," you could lead with "the details seen on the ground indicate that." A hypothesis is not a belief, it is at best a proposal supported by facts and at its worse an assumption that can be believed by someone and unfortunatley by those who believe in the person expounding that assumption, and we all know where assumptions lead when what what the human brain can assume makes an ass out of you and me. Your work is great and you do list many facts that can cause people to question the status quo assumptionsand the beliefs that they have led to, but please make it clear to your listeners that they can make up their own minds and form their own hypothesis based on the facts you have presented and linked togather to form your hypothesis. Beliefs are the problem factor that has led to the current status quo's position in the comfort of its established society, and when assumptions are piled on top of assumptions, we end up with a pile of assholes who try to defend their position in the pile and continue to regurgitate a load of crap. Keep up the good work Matt, and remember that the secret to an open mind is the ability to question current beliefs based on the basic facts that have been generally distorted, misinterpreted, mistranslated and misrepresented to keep a load of assholes safe and regularly employed in promoting constipation as an assumed benefit for their own and other human minds.
Isis wasn't gathered together for burial, he was gathered together for resurrection. After resurrection he was called Osiris. The wife couldn't find his penis, so she made him a gold penis before she resurrected him. If the grave robbers hadn't stolen all the gold, we would know if it was him or not because he would or wouldn't have a gold penis. However Osiris was considered immortal, so it would be odd if his grave was right there. I don't think many Egyptians would believe Osiris was immortal if they could visit his tomb.
Your connecting of mastaba 17 with Osiris is good reasoning. But do we have proof Osiris was just a mythical figure? The legend of Osiris has him killed by Set, and his body parts strewn over Egypt and collected together by Isis who then 'resuscitates' him. The curious fact that the mummy was made of body parts carefully bound and joined together to simulate a human shape would suggest perhaps it was Osiris - and the 'legend' was based on truth. Why otherwise would the body be preserved in such a manner? I don't completely buy the story of the remains being 'lost in the blitz.' The British museum moved the most of their stuff out to secure storage places during the war. I do not think they would have lightly discarded ancient bones that might have been damaged when the building was hit by incendiaries. Suppose the remnants, if there are any, are hidden away in a box somewhere in a store room? Wouldn't that be a find!!
Wow, great work. I really think your on to something. Everything you pointed out here and in prior videos proves so much about the earlier, much more skilled, Egyptians.
Curious that there is no decoration or inscriptions in this 'tomb'. We can't know that the remains found inside are contemporaneous with its highly advanced construction. The precision of the sarcophagus box is inconsistent with the tools available to the attributed builders.
I'm not getting notifications for your videos anymore? Followed from the beginning. Maybe you are uncovering to much :). Always enjoy your videos. Keep going.
When and why was Egypt abandoned? And for how long? And did it happen multiple times since many believe the pyramids were there prior to the Egyptians who brought hieroglyphs?
Wondering if the dismemberment of Osiris and the dismemberment of Andjety are related, especially if Osiris took over Andjety's role as the leader of the underworld. Seems there should be some sort of link here...
Phwoar that one was a corker! Will go away & postulate this for the next 2 weeks as I always do with your segments that grab me. Very interesting video, your logic checks out to me
interestingly enough, osiris was also said to have been cut into many pieces upon his death by set, and then reassembled and reborn to rule the underworld. the chamber is underground, the body was in pieces and reassembled, so perhaps this person was the osiris inspiration, or just at that particular time in history important people chose to mirror the myth in their burials. we may never know.
If the drawing at 7.20 is correct, then it seems to me that the unusual dimensions of the internal box? are worth investigating, as well as who was placed within it. Given the precision with which the stone was cut, and if this is truly one of if not the oldest box of this kind, then the sheer size and scale of the walls of the box, the ill-fitting lid, and the strange angle end and cut out section at the other end has to relate to something worth exploring. Are there any other photographs or drawings that confirm these dimensions, and has any work been done on this cut out shape to explore it further? If we don't have the contents, then we still have the box, and where the box appears to be this unusual, and if the scheme at 7.20 is correct, then it has to follow a pattern that was related to something, and perhaps a something of great importance given the efforts made to construct the inner box in this way.
Although not being a learned professional in the subject, I believe that the dating of per-dynastic Egypt leaves much to be desired. History in general when it comes to pre-writing is, in my opinion, much foreshortened. From before the Younger Dryas to the written history is much richer and much more developed than we know. The cataclysms of the Younger Dryas and the following centuries, erased a great deal of very important history we may never be able to recover.
I am convinced from your battery / energy production video. Maybe like the bull carcaus, the body's of royals prodiluved an energy also. Were pressure built up inside.
@@tkd4 sorry my grammar was dreadful in that post. Yes great idea, who knows! If he did return as osiris, maybe this was the method used to convert man to god.
As another commented - U R really onto sonething. All the clues/cues are viable. And certainly, VERY ancient & separate from later over layer of above surface works.
The flooded structure called the Oserion doesn't have to be a tomb, I mean until we get the water out if we ever do we're not really going to know. I've heard some people speculate it might actually be a cistern. We don't have any reason to believe that it's a tomb.
Based on the mummies reported physical remains curly hair etc could the possible location of the land of punt aka home of their gods in Ethiopia further back the hypothesis that this was a tomb for one of their "gods", which would of probably just been one of the earliest and most influential rulers. The nile does run directly to this location so the connection would be plausible.
I don't think any of the megalithic constructions were tombs. Functional is how they appear to me, but I suspect that later (probably much later) civilisations inherited them and used them as tombs for themselves.
Maybe when these "sarcophagi" were in use they created vibrations to create some form of power which over time turned the stone into those "chips". Maybe the newer power stations were renovated to contain the vibration which created heat which required water-cooling as they became more powerful.
You say that the skull was sent away and was damaged but there where other bone fragments? I wonder if they are still in Egypt in some museum archive somewhere. What about the staffs? Are they still there? They are most likely wood and you could date that fairly accurately. Secondly, can 3D modelling recreate that skull? The photos look actually quite detailed and accurate (I am certain there are probably some with measurements as well), you could do that forensic reconstruction if you had enough details - it looks plausible but that's not my field of expertise.
I read this in the legends of the Old Testament... it’s long but interesting: Therefore the reigning Pharaoh and his council assembled to consult what should be done; and this was decided:-"The cities Pithom and Rameses (Tanis and Heliopolis) are not strong enough to withstand a foe, therefore they must be strengthened." And a royal decree went forth over all the land of Egypt and Goshen, commanding all the inhabitants, both Egyptians and Hebrews, to build. Pharaoh himself set the example by taking trowel and basket in hand, and putting a brick mould on his neck. Whoever saw this hastened to do likewise, and all who were reluctant were stimulated by the overseers with these words, "See how the king works. Will you not imitate his activity?" When Pithom and Rameses were walled, the Israelites were employed to strengthen with forts all the other cities of Egypt, then to build storehouses and pyramids, to dig canals for the Nile, and to rear dykes against the overflow. They were also employed to dig and plough the fields, to garden and prune the fruit-trees, and to exercise trades. They were engaged from early dawn till late at night, and because the way from their homes was often far, they were forced to sleep in the open air, upon the bare ground.[3] As the life of the Israelites became embittered to them, they called the king Merer, "the embitterer," instead of Melol, "the grinder," though that was appropriate enough, one would have supposed.[4]
what needs to be done: first find the orientation of the pyramid and mastaba to the north pole. once you know the orientation check the orientation with Mario Buildreps research. this will give you the time frame the structures were created. then you start from there you hypothesis. i would guess you are looking at an age of 50-100 thousand years are more. i'll see if i can find the orientation to north pole and help with this. so far i agree this structure much older. there is far more to this structure than are shown. these structures are connected to others.
One day the ancient records will be found. I can not believe that the caretakers of the Library of Alexandria would not have hidden some of their most important works.
To all of you looking for an articulate and science based explanation of the internal structure of the pyramids : please consider taking the time to consult the youtube channel @thelandofchem. I've been following a lot of the channels on this topic and so far no one even comes close to that guy. His take on the entire complex is not only solid and grounded, it brings together even the most peculiar architectural structures in a way that makes perfect sense.
so you believe: 1 andjeti the man is buried in the tomb some time before 1st dynasty. 2 tomb location is unknown to everyone after that and andjeti has god status. 3 hundreds or maybe even a thousand years later sneferu finds a tomb, breaks it open somehow, and (given that there is no writing) opens the sarcophagus and finds andjetis body and the bird and crooks (or if they are later additions something else to identify him as andjeti) and realizes he has found andjetis tomb, seals it back up. 4 builds a mastaba ontop and tries to smooth out the step pyramid next to it? i mean, maybe.too bad that bone is dust in the wind now. so sad.
The striking thing about the skull is how Northern European it looks, Scandinavian really. We know the Establishment has been very interested in covering up the truth especially when it comes to ethnicity. We need to tread carefully with the Establishment's findings and falsehoods concerning many issues.
Despite the dark curly hair, this skull doesn't look Sub-Saharan-African. Not even East African (Nubian) because they (Somalians, Ethiopians) have a very distinctive forehead and head shape. This male individual could be mainly of Mediterranian and/or North African/Near Eastern origin. And if it really is the deified Andjety it is even more unlikely that he is of African origin because he was buried in lower Egypt and worshipped in the delta, which is much further away from Nubia than Upper Egypt.
It's interesting know that the "Gods" are black engineers with advance technology, but surely for the whitepeople it's better believe that they were aliens
Another video from the archive that I’ve added to and corrected and republished so that it is more accurate for the viewers. Many of you will have seen it before, but it was certainly worth republishing to correct the errors. Thank you. To support the channel, I’m on Patreon at www.patreon.com/ancientarchitects
Do a series on Neolithic Briton 🤘🤪🤘
still popping your "p" s. (microphone technique) have you got a popper stopper microphone screen? perhaps adjust microphone position for less percussive response?
love your work
thanks
wow Andjety I would love to hear more 👍I am akways amazed by your work Thank you
Re the bones that went to London.
Did they end up in the British Museum? as much of the collection was evacuated before the blitz.
It could be possible some survived and have been misplaced/misfiled like so many other items have been.
*_#DREAMSTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELA_*
I think the biggest clue here is that this body was cut into pieces then put back together. The myth of Osiris says that is what happened to him. I definitely think you are on to something here.
In Petrie's original account he even says this
'A noticeable feature was that the penis had been cut off and bandaged separately "
Osiris's penis being cut off is also an important feature of that myth.
@@lmonk9517 but if i remember correctly Osiris's was never found
@@kinshaw3086 his real one but it is said that Isis contructed him a new penis. Since the body is lost we can't determine if the penis found with the mummy was part of the same person or not. It might have even been a fake penis made from plant matter. Petrie noted that the canopic viscera found in Mastaba were actually vegetable constructs designed to resemble organs so perhaps the penis was also a construct. There is no record of testing done on it before it was 'lost' so we may never know.
@@lmonk9517 More likely the fake penis was made from GOLD just like the one Isis made in the myths. That would have been the very first thing tomb robbers would take.
@@lmonk9517 That's why they say " I'm sporting a real woody."...🤣
Well THAT kind of bummed me out. Considering what may have been lost when those remains were lost/destroyed evokes the same emotion I get thinking about the library of Alexandria, or the burning of the Mayan codices. And makes me wonder, not for the first time, how "accidental" such losses are.
Yeah but since the human race has to start over every 12000 years or so, it doesn't matter anyway.
@@2ndhandjoke , why does it "have to"? They almost certainly didn't have the technology we do now (though I'm sure they also had technology we don't, like acid stone working), that can adapt to and even avert natural disasters.
Chali Chaligha aliens are the earth dwellers who survived the 12k year cycle. Let’s ask them
The exact moment we unlock all the mysteries of this world volcanoes will erupt and huge ocean waves will crash down.... again
@@base99498 , Thank you, but why do you believe these things? I would love it if you could show me evidence for all this.
I really liked the analysis on this one. Im sure you hit on a couple key points that will eventually be proven out to be fact.
Thanks
Yet another amazing video my friend. It’s work like this, with such brilliant hypothesis put forth, along with such compelling examples of evidence to back it up that make your channel my favourite to watch on the internet. You make learning fun and exciting...makes me think, if teachers were more like you back when I was in school, I may have taken a drastically different path, for the better!! Thanks Matt, for all your hard work, and I can’t wait for the next one!!!
I love how you get back at yer former episodes for more detail or change in perception , learning curve. That's where Nat geo and sorts go wrong. They just repeat the same old same old. Thnx
Thanks
Hey Matt❤🕊
Appreciate all your work. Especially, taking the time to update earlier videos.
See you on the next one.
✌❤
Thanks for uploading! This was very interesting!!
Some of this had a very non-Egyptian vibe to it, and I am reminded that I read somewhere long ago that Ausar and Auset (Osiris and Isis are the Greek versions) may not be entirely Egyptian names.
The fake eyeballs remind me of the plastered skulls found in PPNB sites across the Levant, most famously at Jericho. With this in mind, the presence of a possible vulture skull becomes particularly significant because Andjety was known as the 'Bull of Vultures'. This is significant because Catal Huyuk pre-dates Dynastic Egypt by several thousand years, and it is filled with representations of headless corpses undergoing excarnation by vulture on the walls of structures decorated with both real and sculpted bull skulls, as well as the occasional picture of a man with an erection.
Removing the head, before giving the body to vultures, ensures that it remains somewhat intact for later reconstruction. Now that I think about it, Osiris is never depicted as fully mummified -
only his lower body is mummified while his face is always there... and it's decidedly green.
All of the pieces seem to be there connecting Osiris-Andjety with Pre-Pottery Neolithic practices in the Levant thousands of years before anyone thought to unify Egypt... and that's not even taking the spread of agriculture into account (Osiris is not just associated with mummification but also with fertile fields and sprouting crops).
I enjoy watching videos that have information I've never heard before. This was all new to me. Well done!!
This is just fascinating. I believe you are correct about Mastaba 17. Everything that was found with the body supports your hypothesis. This person may have been one of the original pyramid builders. The ancient god that later became Osiris was probably an unknown Pharaoh. This thought definitely opens other possibilities. What a great presentation Matt. Thank you so much!
The more I watch the more I like this channel. Thanks mate 👍👍
I think I saw Zahi Hawass poking his head out from behind one of the structure's in the photographs...
If you did you know there's a lie coming real soon.
This was one of my favorites. Glad to see it revisited. A VERY interesting piece of the Egyptian "puzzle" so carelessly mishandled :(
What an Incredible video thank you so much for sharing it with us
ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC once again !!! I LOVE the longer video with you taking us back to a lost time. Thank's for all you do, GREAT WORK !!!!!!!!!!!!! 👍👍👍
SEE YOU WHEN I'M LOOKING AT YOU !
Amazing work sir!! Excellent research, hypotheses/theories, presentation and narration, as always, very impressive dude. Love it!! Keep it up man!! BIG UP YOURSELF MY DAWG!!!!
What a fascinating video....I am going to have to watch it again.....good reasoning here.....
I am thinking the summary
1. Maybe Andjety was a real historical figure of a local ruler with some knowledge of irrigation, probably learnt from Mesopotamian, which is why he was able to drained the delta marshes and converting it to arable fields.
2. Due to his merit or abilities of draining the marshes, Andjety was apotheosized or deified as national-patron god of his state after his death.
3. Unfortunately, his city-state in Lower Egypt occupied by Upper Egypt force who considered Osiris as their patron god. As the result of being the ruled one, the importance of Andjety degenerated to local small god and being forgotten during the river of history.
Do u think this Andjety learnt the irrigation knowledge from Mesopotamians or assisted by irrigation experts from Mesopotamia?
Rufus, I'm sure you're on the right track there.
Great research, excellent video.
Thank you
Ancient architects, I LOVE your channel!
Could we get another video about the Napta Playa structure? Who created it and how they were the first ones to occupy the Nile valley?
How about another video on the land of Punt and how we’ve found it’s location. WHY did the ancient Egyptians believe it was the land of their ancestors, and land of the gods?
or what about the Uan Muhuggiag mummy, how it is the OLDEST mummy in Africa. What he looked like and the implications of that?
It's not often I'm this early to the game (video) it's been a RUclips kinda day. Thanks Matt 💜
You make a channel
@@mmaworld552 I have one, it's not about ancient history, I leave that to the clever people lol
@@unaaurora9 oh rite makes sense lool
Brilliant detective work here. I have a thought on the multiple pyramids by one Pharoh thesis. Perhaps he started his tomb elsewhere (Bent Pyramid?), then stumbled upon this Mastaba. Upon realizing who was buried there, Sneferu decided to build a new burial place for himself near this tomb of Osiris. Of course this supposes the Meidum Pyramid was for burial.
M17 has the look of a headless sphinx ...
When you mentioned the remains I was waiting for "they got lost". Sure enough.
When looked at case by case these things can happen. During war time, sure a lot of things get destroyed. However there is such a clear pattern when it comes to finds that can be considered anomalies, those that could have upset the carefully constructed timeline. They all go missing.
They are not lost and they are not destroyed. They are in the Vatican
I don't buy that they were destroyed in the blitz. It is well documented that the British museum moved all of their collection deep underground before the bombing started so if it was moved there then it would be safe from bombings. The source under this video isn't clear where about in London it was moved to but since it was discovered by Petrie it was probably in his collection, which was also moved out of london....... So unless it was carelessly left behind (seems unlikely) or it was sold into a private collection (not really Petrie's style) I should think that it may still be in existence somewhere.
Very interesting thank you.. Im visiting Meidum in a few weeks and this will no doubt enhance my visit :)
Thank you! Love your channel and every video! This one was a new adventure and really appreciate the work you do.
And also, Osiris was supposed to have been cur into pieces, then reassembled as a mommy, which fits the state of the defleshed remains found.
You make a compelling case for Osiris. Are we sure the skull was lost to the blitz? How sad if so. Thanks for all your videos.
Thank you for that one Matt. Surely one of your most exciting topics!
The burial would have to be a re-use of the site. It's one of those pressure chambers from the antediluvian culture, re-used to bury someone.
Dismembered and reassembled is, of course the story of Osiris. Maybe it was! The remains are ALWAYS missing or ACCIDENTALLY destroyed. Somebody REALLY does not want us to know our true history.
Fantastic! Thank you for this video and your research.
Matt, instead of saying "I believe that," you could lead with "the details seen on the ground indicate that." A hypothesis is not a belief, it is at best a proposal supported by facts and at its worse an assumption that can be believed by someone and unfortunatley by those who believe in the person expounding that assumption, and we all know where assumptions lead when what what the human brain can assume makes an ass out of you and me.
Your work is great and you do list many facts that can cause people to question the status quo assumptionsand the beliefs that they have led to, but please make it clear to your listeners that they can make up their own minds and form their own hypothesis based on the facts you have presented and linked togather to form your hypothesis.
Beliefs are the problem factor that has led to the current status quo's position in the comfort of its established society, and when assumptions are piled on top of assumptions, we end up with a pile of assholes who try to defend their position in the pile and continue to regurgitate a load of crap.
Keep up the good work Matt, and remember that the secret to an open mind is the ability to question current beliefs based on the basic facts that have been generally distorted, misinterpreted, mistranslated and misrepresented to keep a load of assholes safe and regularly employed in promoting constipation as an assumed benefit for their own and other human minds.
Not everything that is indicative of something is something he has to believe, so his wording is correct.
Proven, not prooved....kinda thing. 🤣
That one guy who body was tore to pieces and his widow gathered all of his bones for burial
@Flashy Paws lol ikr a little is we need right just a little
@Flashy Paws the story of Isis and Osiris.
Isis wasn't gathered together for burial, he was gathered together for resurrection. After resurrection he was called Osiris. The wife couldn't find his penis, so she made him a gold penis before she resurrected him. If the grave robbers hadn't stolen all the gold, we would know if it was him or not because he would or wouldn't have a gold penis.
However Osiris was considered immortal, so it would be odd if his grave was right there. I don't think many Egyptians would believe Osiris was immortal if they could visit his tomb.
@Flashy Paws Osiris. Osiris was cut into pieces. Isis was the widow who gathered the body parts to reassemble them
You are indeed a true ancient detective!! 🕵️♂️
Thank you very much for this great video!!
Congrats on this one. Great report! Looking forward to more like this 👏
Fascinating speculation and research! I really get a sense of the vastness of the history, the humanity, and the possibilities within the unknown.
Excellent video. Thank you.
Best research video I've seen on this channel to date.
Another very interesting and quality content thanks
Your connecting of mastaba 17 with Osiris is good reasoning. But do we have proof Osiris was just a mythical figure? The legend of Osiris has him killed by Set, and his body parts strewn over Egypt and collected together by Isis who then 'resuscitates' him. The curious fact that the mummy was made of body parts carefully bound and joined together to simulate a human shape would suggest perhaps it was Osiris - and the 'legend' was based on truth. Why otherwise would the body be preserved in such a manner? I don't completely buy the story of the remains being 'lost in the blitz.' The British museum moved the most of their stuff out to secure storage places during the war. I do not think they would have lightly discarded ancient bones that might have been damaged when the building was hit by incendiaries. Suppose the remnants, if there are any, are hidden away in a box somewhere in a store room? Wouldn't that be a find!!
@HailOdin666
It was just a thought. If you're after a fight, you won't get one from me. Go and pick on someone else. Bye.
very interesting video, thank you.
Absolutely marvellous video! So much food for thought.
I've never been so convinced about a tomb theory.
So in college I studied cultural anthropology; focused on religion and folklore; Love the Osiris information which I had not know before. Great work.
Interesting hypothesis, alot of good points made
what did they do with the damaged bones/artefacts after the blitz? just sweep it up and dump it in a bin??
Couldn't agree more pyramids were not originally built as burial chambers. Great research Matt really enjoyable thanks again.
I love this channel! Absolutely brilliant. Also, YT algorithms has failed to bring this video to my attention, so thanks for reposting.
Wow, great work. I really think your on to something. Everything you pointed out here and in prior videos proves so much about the earlier, much more skilled, Egyptians.
Curious that there is no decoration or inscriptions in this 'tomb'. We can't know that the remains found inside are contemporaneous with its highly advanced construction. The precision of the sarcophagus box is inconsistent with the tools available to the attributed builders.
I'm not getting notifications for your videos anymore? Followed from the beginning. Maybe you are uncovering to much :). Always enjoy your videos. Keep going.
Thanks for another wonderful video!
When and why was Egypt abandoned? And for how long?
And did it happen multiple times since many believe the pyramids were there prior to the Egyptians who brought hieroglyphs?
Wondering if the dismemberment of Osiris and the dismemberment of Andjety are related, especially if Osiris took over Andjety's role as the leader of the underworld. Seems there should be some sort of link here...
I really enjoyed this video. You make a compelling argument. But isn't Osiris supposed to be buried in Abydos?
What I can't understand is, why if you go to so much trouble to hide a body would you broadcast its existence by building a structure above it.
Phwoar that one was a corker! Will go away & postulate this for the next 2 weeks as I always do with your segments that grab me. Very interesting video, your logic checks out to me
Love the vids. Your sleuth is showing. Nice work!
Hi, Ancient Architects!
Thank you,that was most interesting,......ALL ancient pyramid complexes are far older than the Egyptian period....never tombs .
interestingly enough, osiris was also said to have been cut into many pieces upon his death by set, and then reassembled and reborn to rule the underworld. the chamber is underground, the body was in pieces and reassembled, so perhaps this person was the osiris inspiration, or just at that particular time in history important people chose to mirror the myth in their burials. we may never know.
Excellent video
Great Video!
Superlative interpretation of the evidence!
Excellent stuff as always!
If the drawing at 7.20 is correct, then it seems to me that the unusual dimensions of the internal box? are worth investigating, as well as who was placed within it. Given the precision with which the stone was cut, and if this is truly one of if not the oldest box of this kind, then the sheer size and scale of the walls of the box, the ill-fitting lid, and the strange angle end and cut out section at the other end has to relate to something worth exploring. Are there any other photographs or drawings that confirm these dimensions, and has any work been done on this cut out shape to explore it further? If we don't have the contents, then we still have the box, and where the box appears to be this unusual, and if the scheme at 7.20 is correct, then it has to follow a pattern that was related to something, and perhaps a something of great importance given the efforts made to construct the inner box in this way.
How many pieces was the body broken in to? Was the phallus missing????
Although not being a learned professional in the subject, I believe that the dating of per-dynastic Egypt leaves much to be desired. History in general when it comes to pre-writing is, in my opinion, much foreshortened. From before the Younger Dryas to the written history is much richer and much more developed than we know. The cataclysms of the Younger Dryas and the following centuries, erased a great deal of very important history we may never be able to recover.
I am convinced from your battery / energy production video. Maybe like the bull carcaus, the body's of royals prodiluved an energy also. Were pressure built up inside.
Maybe it was a sacrifice also instead of a tomb. The body being used as the battery
@@tkd4 sorry my grammar was dreadful in that post. Yes great idea, who knows! If he did return as osiris, maybe this was the method used to convert man to god.
As another commented - U R really onto sonething. All the clues/cues are viable. And certainly, VERY ancient & separate from later over layer of above surface works.
I’m confused about this and The Osireon. Which one is the real Osiris? This one was, right? He’s cut up into 14 pieces and his phallas is missing?
The flooded structure called the Oserion doesn't have to be a tomb, I mean until we get the water out if we ever do we're not really going to know. I've heard some people speculate it might actually be a cistern. We don't have any reason to believe that it's a tomb.
Based on the mummies reported physical remains curly hair etc could the possible location of the land of punt aka home of their gods in Ethiopia further back the hypothesis that this was a tomb for one of their "gods", which would of probably just been one of the earliest and most influential rulers. The nile does run directly to this location so the connection would be plausible.
Have any remains from ancient burial sites on the south side of the Meidum pyramid been dated?
I don't think any of the megalithic constructions were tombs. Functional is how they appear to me, but I suspect that later (probably much later) civilisations inherited them and used them as tombs for themselves.
WOW! Thank you for your research.
Maybe when these "sarcophagi" were in use they created vibrations to create some form of power which over time turned the stone into those "chips". Maybe the newer power stations were renovated to contain the vibration which created heat which required water-cooling as they became more powerful.
About time you talked sense again.
You say that the skull was sent away and was damaged but there where other bone fragments? I wonder if they are still in Egypt in some museum archive somewhere. What about the staffs? Are they still there? They are most likely wood and you could date that fairly accurately. Secondly, can 3D modelling recreate that skull? The photos look actually quite detailed and accurate (I am certain there are probably some with measurements as well), you could do that forensic reconstruction if you had enough details - it looks plausible but that's not my field of expertise.
My favorite channel of all time.
*_#DREAMSTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELA_*
Interesting video.
I read this in the legends of the Old Testament... it’s long but interesting:
Therefore the reigning Pharaoh and his council assembled to consult what should be done; and this was decided:-"The cities Pithom and Rameses (Tanis and Heliopolis) are not strong enough to withstand a foe, therefore they must be strengthened." And a royal decree went forth over all the land of Egypt and Goshen, commanding all the inhabitants, both Egyptians and Hebrews, to build. Pharaoh himself set the example by taking trowel and basket in hand, and putting a brick mould on his neck. Whoever saw this hastened to do likewise, and all who were reluctant were stimulated by the overseers with these words, "See how the king works. Will you not imitate his activity?"
When Pithom and Rameses were walled, the Israelites were employed to strengthen with forts all the other cities of Egypt, then to build storehouses and pyramids, to dig canals for the Nile, and to rear dykes against the overflow. They were also employed to dig and plough the fields, to garden and prune the fruit-trees, and to exercise trades. They were engaged from early dawn till late at night, and because the way from their homes was often far, they were forced to sleep in the open air, upon the bare ground.[3]
As the life of the Israelites became embittered to them, they called the king Merer, "the embitterer," instead of Melol, "the grinder," though that was appropriate enough, one would have supposed.[4]
what needs to be done: first find the orientation of the pyramid and mastaba to the north pole. once you know the orientation check the orientation with Mario Buildreps research. this will give you the time frame the structures were created. then you start from there you hypothesis. i would guess you are looking at an age of 50-100 thousand years are more. i'll see if i can find the orientation to north pole and help with this. so far i agree this structure much older. there is far more to this structure than are shown. these structures are connected to others.
One day the ancient records will be found. I can not believe that the caretakers of the Library of Alexandria would not have hidden some of their most important works.
Great video
Great video!
👍
👍
To all of you looking for an articulate and science based explanation of the internal structure of the pyramids : please consider taking the time to consult the youtube channel @thelandofchem. I've been following a lot of the channels on this topic and so far no one even comes close to that guy. His take on the entire complex is not only solid and grounded, it brings together even the most peculiar architectural structures in a way that makes perfect sense.
so you believe: 1 andjeti the man is buried in the tomb some time before 1st dynasty. 2 tomb location is unknown to everyone after that and andjeti has god status. 3 hundreds or maybe even a thousand years later sneferu finds a tomb, breaks it open somehow, and (given that there is no writing) opens the sarcophagus and finds andjetis body and the bird and crooks (or if they are later additions something else to identify him as andjeti) and realizes he has found andjetis tomb, seals it back up. 4 builds a mastaba ontop and tries to smooth out the step pyramid next to it?
i mean, maybe.too bad that bone is dust in the wind now. so sad.
excellent work
Cheers
Great video, thank You 🥰
Well shit. That puts a whole new perspective on the pyramids. That is the best hypothesis I've heard.
I did this ! see my video, its just raw footage of me going through it with my boy , it was super awesome to do
I am intrigued for more topic of andjety who was reincarnated from king to god osiris....
He was king and then became a god in the north who became amalgamated with Osiris - not many gods joined together over time.
0:54 you didn't link the video!
very interesting. thank you.
btw. are you an Architect in real life?
The striking thing about the skull is how Northern European it looks, Scandinavian really. We know the Establishment has been very interested in covering up the truth especially when it comes to ethnicity. We need to tread carefully with the Establishment's findings and falsehoods concerning many issues.
Because Scandinavians are known for their tight curly right?
@@hexkwondo i was referring to the characteristics of the skull ofcorse. the black curly hair "went missing" or never existed in the first place.
What did it have plug blocks if it was buried?
Can they make a face from the picture of the skull?
I guess experts can...
They more than likely can but of course they will Whitewash the reconstruction the way they Whitewashed King Tut.
Despite the dark curly hair, this skull doesn't look Sub-Saharan-African. Not even East African (Nubian) because they (Somalians, Ethiopians) have a very distinctive forehead and head shape. This male individual could be mainly of Mediterranian and/or North African/Near Eastern origin.
And if it really is the deified Andjety it is even more unlikely that he is of African origin because he was buried in lower Egypt and worshipped in the delta, which is much further away from Nubia than Upper Egypt.
@@AncientArchitects ...I thought you said it was destroyed?
It's interesting know that the "Gods" are black engineers with advance technology, but surely for the whitepeople it's better believe that they were aliens
Found copper tools. What and how cut the granite?? The lid is similar to those in Cairo museum .