4:20 That's an impressive approach, you can notice how he first is coming in with a glide angle of about 1:1 and then flattens out by increasing the throttle, totally different from landing a plane, amazing
Ever since the Tilt Rotor (the precurser of the V22) was announced, I have always had the fantasy of having my own to move around the city at building level.
There is a squadron of V 22 ‘s based RAAF airbase in Darwin Australia and I’ve seen them flying over sometimes on training missions . Their rotors sound awesome because they have 2 main rotors unlike choppers .
Are they though? I think the main negative its difficult to control when hovering - cant easily change direction or start moving with the blades up. This limits its usability compared to helicopter.
@@misium Any perceived limitations of this aircraft are completely negated by it's massive range. This is as revolutionary to tactical warfare as the stealth fighter was to strategic bombing. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Boeing_V-22_Osprey#/media/File:MV-22B_combat_radius_in_Iraq_compared_with_CH-46E_combat_radius.svg
@@SBCBears The CV-22 is equipped with integrated threat countermeasures, terrain-following radar, forward-looking infrared sensor and other advanced avionics systems that allow it to operate at low altitude in adverse weather conditions and medium- to high-threat environments.
The CV-22 is equipped with integrated threat countermeasures, terrain-following radar, forward-looking infrared sensor and other advanced avionics systems that allow it to operate at low altitude in adverse weather conditions and medium- to high-threat environments.
I saw one fly by and land in my hometowns air port The noise caught my attention its look kept my gaze as it was coming in I was boarding a ck 10 at the time and was near the top of the stair case into it when i saw this beauty
@@gravestone9831 That’s what I’ve read. Normal takeoff is more gas efficient so a vertical takeoff is probably only performed when it’s necessary I’d guess
Really the Valor is what the V22 program should have been; light, simple maneuverable. The V22 being heavy lift, with full rotating nacelles, folding wing/rotors etc. were too many engineering problems for one aircraft. The manufacturers were trying to dip into as many budgets as possible, promising the V22 could do everything from Special Forces insertions to transporting mail around the fleet. In the end it's really not that great for anything other than long distance logistics when you don't have a runway. It's ill suited for combat as it's not very nimble and creates minor tornado below it, but is too high maintenance for routine logistical tasks. They should have started with something like the Valor and worked towards a heavy V22 rather than the other way around.
Hmm I thought they were going to put a 20 MM Gatling gun on the nose and a 50 cal. on the tail? That's what they said when they started talking about the "new improved Osprey".
I am not super sure.... but I think they are joined through a transmission, because it can fly with one engine out. They do have pitch control on the props so it can drift left or right in hover.
If the Army hadn't bailed on the project their version wouldn't have had the rotating wing. The Marine and Navy versions have them because they have to fit in the same deck and hanger space as a CH-53.
@@pahtar7189 Not only that, due to the ship born requirement, the Osprey's wingspan was cut by at least 6 feet and the rotor diameter was reduced by 1 blade and 10 feet diameter. The designer said if those were able to be added, then the Osprey would be at its most efficent and would gain at least another 150 miles in range and 50K in speed! but due to the stringent onboard ship requirement, they had to knock the wingspan down and the rotor down one blade, and reduce its diameter in order to allow the wings and rotors to fold and be store on board the ship. Same with the vertical stab, it should be taller but then it would be too tall and hit the amphib hanger roof it it's any taller! This is why the new V-280 will not have such restrictions. Too bad!
Well what about the C5a galaxy operation baby lift that killed 180 people we still fly the c5 galaxy. The DC 10 lost an engine in Chicago killed 275 people. Airplanes crash they always have & always will. It’s a game of numbers don’t react to a tragedy, google the name, look at a RUclips video and leave a baseless comment. The v22 is an excellent aircraft it is the fastest helicopter in the world. Ask a soldier would he rather be transported to combat in a lumbering helicopter or in the worlds fastest helicopter? One of the blue angels crashed. are we going to ask the blue angels to stop flying?
@@wcolby No disrespect intended my friend but what good will that do you if you're hovering helplessly in range of an anti-aircraft weapon or even just a common RPG?
@@montybrewster7 No dis taken... I feel this aircraft gets a bad rap because of the accidents during testing. In reality I would rather fly in this aircraft than a helicopter... it has a faster cruise speed than a helicopter, and if and when it hovers it presents the same profile as a helicopter. I can't figure out a faster way to get marines to where they need to be.
@@wcolby to give you some context, I viewed this vid having just watched several videos showcasing the Bell V-280, which granted is a much smaller aircraft & built for a different role. However, I love the concept of the Osprey & I in no way factored in it's record during testing. Yet having personally experienced what the RAF was capably of with the Chinook & Puma (RAF Odiham) when I was a mere air cadet I can't help feeling this aircraft is unusually vulnerable. That said, when it's flown in operational rediness I'm sure it's a very capable aircraft, of that I have no doubt. I'm just waiting to see a video where it blows me away. Anyone that has seen the RAF Chinook's airshow displays will know what I mean. But I enjoy the discourse & take no offense at your objections. Best wishes from the UK.
It is surprisingly nimble, resilient to AAA, and acceleration out of the LZ is amazing. Our teams in Afghanistan appreciated its capabilities, and I trusted it to get me home every night
I can’t understand why the Air Force would have these systems Marines and Army for sure, the Air Force since I’ve been in the service doesn’t have ground fighting as a mission but rescue for sure, it just surprised me to see this.
Why would the fuselage stay horizontal if these huge rotors tilt in flight? It just looks too cumbersome. The transition from horizontal flight to vertical landing takes too long.
I urge you to come up with a better idea.. That's how we improve designs, by experimenting, if your idea works you could make lots of money, when you sell your better idea to the aircraft companies. so get busy! YOU CAN DO IT!
It's usefulness is still kinda in question. And as a $36 billion program, I mean, you could design, build and operate an entire aircraft carrier for that amount of money.
Sven Cas go to military college for the US navy or marine core and while in that be in rotc also every military college offers that and when 4 years is fine they will direct you through everything else and you will be guaranteed to be a pilot and fly but not 100 percent you will fly. But your not garunteed you will fly the aircraft u wanna. Or for the airforce you have to be smart and join the airforce. Jist do other research btw.
I still say, a simpler design would be to locate the engines in the aircraft's center section driving one main transmission like every multiengine helicopter in the world, the only thing that needs to rotate at the wing tips, are gear boxes
@@Agislife1960 it serves a different purpose, It's a heavy lifter and remember that the V-22 has to rotate its wing for easier storage so shoving more stuff in the center adds complexity which adds weight
The unique design, the way of Rotating such heavy engines (more technical difficulties, ) is not so efficient, I think. Such heavy Engine part should not be rotated. That is my opinion. I wonder why they are not developing 4 routers version of much bigger one.
@Ali Mohsin ali le chimique ? ou ali express ou ali mc beal ? non ali de Bae system ou ali badou ali gonnes ali express ali j ai acheté un virus oups ????
If you base your assumption on "I saw a video once of one crashing" then you are correct. In reality, this aircraft is the fastest "helicopter" the US military has.
And those "many, many crashes!" happened during service development and early training, BEFORE the Corps figured out that either you start from scratch with training pilots, or you put Helicopter-rated pilots in there to transition. You DO NOT try to transition a highly-experienced, trained FIXED-Wing driver, in the command seat of a V-22 Osprey and say, after just a few hours, "Hey, you got this, man." The Osprey is 'relatively' easy to fly on a simulator, but then again, so is a 747 or an F-18.
.....It’s a damn good thing that’s you guys are not Engineers or this crap would never been invented...........it would still be laying on the top of the drawing board........
Let's be honest!! Too many people were killed during the test phase of this awkward looking machine! I've heard from some Marines that it's a terrorizing ride. What a bust!!! I wonder what states politician benefited from the push through of this disaster!! And at the cost of human lives! A crime it is!!!
Phil Hand Please don't be scared of this machine. It is the fastest helicopter in the marine corps. If Thomas Selfridge had his way, you wouldn't be allowed to fly.
Phil; let’s be honest, you probably haven’t actually spoken to any marines. This aircraft is one of the safest in our military’s inventory. Team members appreciate how rapidly we can get to their objective to execute the mission, and has continued to expand its capabilities. But for armchair jockeys to opine on things about which they know next to nothing, well; a crime it is. Oh, here...you left some of these behind !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !
I don’t want to hurt your feelings but I’m gonna be honest with you.. when you hear about a crash and then go to RUclips & type in the word “V-22” and then make a baseless comment with your narrow perception, is not the right thing to do. the C5A galaxy killed 170 people in its first years and most of them were babies! The v22 is the worlds fastest helicopter it’s a dream machine for getting into a combat situation quickly and dropping off fighters when there is no runway. I fly in a helicopter every day (today I was above 9000 feet) I know the list of helicopter crashes in the last 20 years but I can know that in relation to the hours flown. The V-22 is no more deadly than any other military aircraft.. Please Google “operation baby lift” and ask why the C5A Galaxy is still in service.
USAF VET, why are we broadcasting the capabilities of these and all other technically advanced weaponry? Our corporate weapons competition, outright and future enemies no longer need HUMIT we tell them, and show every single detail. Our edge is not multiplicities for overwhelming, our edge is our technical advances and ingenuity. Never before Bush 2 did we embed reporters who gave troop position, or allow this amount of technical info to be "given" squandering our R&D. Obama gave our enemies notifications of all of the military goals two week's in advance, President Trump ends that and our force's stomped ISIs.
Maverick Rider Nice shading on your asinine political comment. Three things... 1) If you think our enemies are getting their recon from youtube, you are stupid. 2) This video was produced by the DOD, and you are still stupid. 3) up till last week the US was flying Kurds on these aircraft & now they are our enemy, and you are still stupid. And this one is free.. If you think the US has stopped ISIs... we didn't, we just changed their name, and you're stupid enough to believe the marketing.
@Tom Gulbranson I think the thing that got under my skin was the political comment. politics doesn't matter, and I don't want it on my channel. I accept that im a hot head, I yelled at a guy today for taking up two parking spaces. really... we had a long conversation and in the end he agreed that taking up two spaces makes him less of a man. I digress. The DOD released this video so they want people to be aware of our capabilities. it cost me "RUclips dollars" to block people, so I want people to comment but I won't tolerate political BS. PS. Maverick rider and I are probably aligned with the same political party. Tom, thank you for letting me explain, & I do feel a little better now.
Please name an experimental aircraft that didn't cost lives. Even the Wright brothers killed a passenger in one of their first demonstration flights. Its a price that is paid when we push the boundaries of possible.
I served in the Marines for over 20 years and as a combat tested Infantry Unit Leader (64-94); I was not ready to put my Marines on this death trap at the time. Yes, many lost their lives UNNECESSARILY because of someone allegedly withholding valuable flaw information about the aircraft. I'm pleased to learn those defects have been corrected. RIP Marines.
@@DevilDawg-mk7tg As an r&d drive systems test i found glaring defects the story we get in the news is usually far from truth.The ship we lost ar Pax River was flown from cold weather testing without the fairleads in the firewalls.A hydraulic line broke and started a fire the shaft was carbon fiber going to the overunning clutch and quickly burned through not allowing power from the opposite engine to turn the proprotor.Many believe it can fly on one engine.I was told in 97 they could hope to land at best.All the gearboxes were required to go 30 minutes without oil .We tested them and they would go one hour dry the paint burned off the bearings looked like raisins but they were tough.The shafts between tilt-axis gearboxes were a major weak point.The midwing gearbox shaft came straight out instead of the swept forward angle of the driveline.The couplings took up the difference 1.2 degrees of deflection was the limit 1.3 and they exploded.Titanium was too brittle.The shafts in the midwing gearbox should have been at the angle of the driveline.The engineer looked at me like i was crazy when i pointed this out my first day.I believe they were slow on purpose if it were fixed they would be out of a job.My responsibility as an a&p was the SAFETY of the aircraft and passengers.They were still breaking the couplings 2 years later when I took a job with.American Airlines.As a technician I would not have ridden on a V-22 then I sincerely hope they have improved .The marines were the ones that wanted this aircraft and kept it going.
Guess tho D.O.D. figures we'll never go to war in a jungle again, because you ain't landing that thing anywhere. Not that it matters they rarely land right side up anyway.
JD L funny thing - ever heard of a Boeing-Vertol CH-47 "Chinook"? How about a Sikorsky HH-53 "Jolly Green Giant"? BOTH of them were operational in a little place called Vietnam - which had everything from grasslands to jungle to mountain woodlands. About the only thing that was in limited supply was desert and snowfields. Know your subjects before you spout off.
Que cosa más fea y no se como llamarlo, no creo que se alla exportado porque quien va a comprar algo tan feo y poco práctico porque debe estar todo el día en taller preparando, los complejos soportes de hélices
death trap piece of shit, probably killed more very skilled airman then any other flying machine during its R&D. YOU WOULD NOT GET MY ASS IN THIS PIECE OF CRAP ESPECIALLY GOING INTO A HOT ZONE.
4:20 That's an impressive approach, you can notice how he first is coming in with a glide angle of about 1:1 and then flattens out by increasing the throttle, totally different from landing a plane, amazing
Future choper ..great technology ... Keep up guys ... From IRAQ🇮🇶
Ever since the Tilt Rotor (the precurser of the V22) was announced, I have always had the fantasy of having my own to move around the city at building level.
check Agusta 609
Saw one in norfolk last week for first time awesome
Tt⁸I 45455⁵⁶you 5anyour d and is 5.ulp with 7⁷⁷9⁹ouu⁸87⁸ùuuuùuùùuùuuuùuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu⁶uuuuù⁷uuuu⁸ig888y⁹⁹u⁸⁹uu77u7u⁷up v⁷⁷unusu8ally ⁸
simply engineering marvel more useful than anything else.
These new ospreys are so awesome to watch and see also great video of them 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
Awesome flying machines!
Excellent film footage and sound.
Cool aircraft
And it’s not even crashing! Wow!
C-130's kick ass!!
🌹 GOOD JOB FAIR
V-22 este vehiculo me encanta lo encuentro extraordinario
Beautiful!
Very proud What you do .God bless
In 20 years, that same plane will be the Marine Corps' newest Osprey.
😂
The marines already have ospreys
The ones the marines have now are crap 😂
Ya know what ?, That machine would make a great camper. Built-in ice chest, fridge, potty 💥💥 Bam !
excellent !!!
There is a squadron of V 22 ‘s based RAAF airbase in Darwin Australia and I’ve seen them flying over sometimes on training missions . Their rotors sound awesome because they have 2 main rotors unlike choppers .
Hi l liked it very much l love helicopter
Yooo, that's very cool my man
It's an amazing aircraft. The possibilities are endless.
Alas, I see that the negatives are the same old, tired lines. Welcome to the 21st Century!!!
Are they though? I think the main negative its difficult to control when hovering - cant easily change direction or start moving with the blades up. This limits its usability compared to helicopter.
@@misium Any perceived limitations of this aircraft are completely negated by it's massive range. This is as revolutionary to tactical warfare as the stealth fighter was to strategic bombing. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_Boeing_V-22_Osprey#/media/File:MV-22B_combat_radius_in_Iraq_compared_with_CH-46E_combat_radius.svg
Needs massive ion engines now
I guess the Marine Corps led the way in this tech too. Everybody wants to be a Marine.
I saw two of them flying tandem over Southwest Florida .
I like how the USAF modified that tiltrotor for special ops.
How was it modified?
@@SBCBears The CV-22 is equipped with integrated threat countermeasures, terrain-following radar, forward-looking infrared sensor and other advanced avionics systems that allow it to operate at low altitude in adverse weather conditions and medium- to high-threat environments.
Should be modified to accommodate the wart hog battel platform munitions abilities and theater operational parameters !
The V-22 should be nicknamed "Popeye". Look at those guns on both sides!
Where do you see guns? Its all clean on the sides, and they only mount a gun under the aircraft, and this one does not have it.
@@Notyou5556 I think he means “guns” as in arms - he’s referring to the turboprops. And I have seen it nicknamed Popeye elsewhere for that reason!
Any substantial difference between the Marine Corps version and the Air Force version?
The CV-22 is equipped with integrated threat countermeasures, terrain-following radar, forward-looking infrared sensor and other advanced avionics systems that allow it to operate at low altitude in adverse weather conditions and medium- to high-threat environments.
About 6 years
@Joseph Smith Air Force maintains them 1000 times better than the jarheads do.
Mainly avionics fit. This version is for special forces delivery, all weather nap of the earth flying, etc. Basically a tilt rotor Pave Low.
They are Louder than this in real life !
I saw one fly by and land in my hometowns air port
The noise caught my attention its look kept my gaze as it was coming in
I was boarding a ck 10 at the time and was near the top of the stair case into it when i saw this beauty
Does CV-22 have ailerons when flying in plane mode?
Great question! It’s has ailerons in airplane mode but they are referred to as flaperons because that control surface also acts as flaps
Cool
How does the pilot perform the conversion mode from heli-mode to plane-mode?
It is pretty much a knob that they can turn and they can choose the position incrementally it’s not either or.
1:51 What is that yellow gas tank with that small wheel?
I believe that is a chemical fire extinguisher.
Suitable for extinguishing a fuel fire.
@@wcolby Thank you for reply.
We call it a flightline fire bottle. It contains halon with basically robs the air of oxygen thus taking that oxygen away from the fire.
It would be a REALLY bad day if they needed to use that "yellow gas tank" for its intended purpose and it actually DID have gas in it!! LOL!!!
I wish they would take off vertically more often
Probably takes more gas to do so
@@gravestone9831 That’s what I’ve read. Normal takeoff is more gas efficient so a vertical takeoff is probably only performed when it’s necessary I’d guess
Just wait til the Valor reaches serial production.
@luke wilson this is a preproduction model. Obviously, the attack models will look more menacing.
If The Valor does come in it will be low numbers and use for Special Forces that's just my opinion man
The valor is awesome !
Really the Valor is what the V22 program should have been; light, simple maneuverable. The V22 being heavy lift, with full rotating nacelles, folding wing/rotors etc. were too many engineering problems for one aircraft. The manufacturers were trying to dip into as many budgets as possible, promising the V22 could do everything from Special Forces insertions to transporting mail around the fleet. In the end it's really not that great for anything other than long distance logistics when you don't have a runway. It's ill suited for combat as it's not very nimble and creates minor tornado below it, but is too high maintenance for routine logistical tasks. They should have started with something like the Valor and worked towards a heavy V22 rather than the other way around.
@@Sphere723 good points
Hmm I thought they were going to put a 20 MM Gatling gun on the nose and a 50 cal. on the tail? That's what they said when they started talking about the "new improved Osprey".
and now you know where Bell v280 comes from ... and they made it still only seat 12 when they could have just used this and sent more troops ..
Máy bay này nhìn nó cồng kềnh là mục tiêu dễ bị bắn trúng nhất..
it should have 4 propelers instead of 2,now it will look like an actual dropship.
That is a different project all together my friend, this twin one already delivers...
Interesting machine, the plumage resembles Antonov’s aircraft
Not even close.
Are the props timed?
I am not super sure.... but I think they are joined through a transmission, because it can fly with one engine out. They do have pitch control on the props so it can drift left or right in hover.
Tell you what got two big ass turboprops on that thing that's for sure
salut florence regarde ce qu il faut acheté pour nos porte hélicoptère
ou barkhane
allez a plus dans le bus...
I wonder if this version does away with the wing rotation for stow it would be lighter and more capable
It does, but not by a ton
I read somewhere that it still does the wing and rotor rotation, but it's all manual to save a bit of weight.
If the Army hadn't bailed on the project their version wouldn't have had the rotating wing. The Marine and Navy versions have them because they have to fit in the same deck and hanger space as a CH-53.
@@pahtar7189 Not only that, due to the ship born requirement, the Osprey's wingspan was cut by at least 6 feet and the rotor diameter was reduced by 1 blade and 10 feet diameter. The designer said if those were able to be added, then the Osprey would be at its most efficent and would gain at least another 150 miles in range and 50K in speed! but due to the stringent onboard ship requirement, they had to knock the wingspan down and the rotor down one blade, and reduce its diameter in order to allow the wings and rotors to fold and be store on board the ship. Same with the vertical stab, it should be taller but then it would be too tall and hit the amphib hanger roof it it's any taller! This is why the new V-280 will not have such restrictions. Too bad!
😮👍
How many more accidents and deaths are we going to learn about. Is this airworthy?
Well what about the C5a galaxy operation baby lift that killed 180 people we still fly the c5 galaxy. The DC 10 lost an engine in Chicago killed 275 people. Airplanes crash they always have & always will. It’s a game of numbers don’t react to a tragedy, google the name, look at a RUclips video and leave a baseless comment. The v22 is an excellent aircraft it is the fastest helicopter in the world. Ask a soldier would he rather be transported to combat in a lumbering helicopter or in the worlds fastest helicopter? One of the blue angels crashed. are we going to ask the blue angels to stop flying?
These things always look so cumbersome & nervous. I imagine you must feel like a sitting duck in an operational situation!
Tell that to the .50 cal on the ramp
@@wcolby No disrespect intended my friend but what good will that do you if you're hovering helplessly in range of an anti-aircraft weapon or even just a common RPG?
@@montybrewster7 No dis taken... I feel this aircraft gets a bad rap because of the accidents during testing. In reality I would rather fly in this aircraft than a helicopter... it has a faster cruise speed than a helicopter, and if and when it hovers it presents the same profile as a helicopter. I can't figure out a faster way to get marines to where they need to be.
@@wcolby to give you some context, I viewed this vid having just watched several videos showcasing the Bell V-280, which granted is a much smaller aircraft & built for a different role. However, I love the concept of the Osprey & I in no way factored in it's record during testing. Yet having personally experienced what the RAF was capably of with the Chinook & Puma (RAF Odiham) when I was a mere air cadet I can't help feeling this aircraft is unusually vulnerable. That said, when it's flown in operational rediness I'm sure it's a very capable aircraft, of that I have no doubt. I'm just waiting to see a video where it blows me away. Anyone that has seen the RAF Chinook's airshow displays will know what I mean. But I enjoy the discourse & take no offense at your objections. Best wishes from the UK.
It is surprisingly nimble, resilient to AAA, and acceleration out of the LZ is amazing. Our teams in Afghanistan appreciated its capabilities, and I trusted it to get me home every night
😆 I think osprey or kingkong or maybe gorila
We need a Mach 2 troop Trainsportation !
👌 concorde
No, we don't.
V-22 Osprey
walter
What the fuck is the difference between the v-22 and the cv-22?
I can’t understand why the Air Force would have these systems Marines and Army for sure, the Air Force since I’ve been in the service doesn’t have ground fighting as a mission but rescue for sure, it just surprised me to see this.
Have you heard of battlefield airmen?
Speed is an important consideration in combat. These are the fastest service helicopters in the world at the moment.
Can’t understand, or too lazy to google it?
Why would the fuselage stay horizontal if these huge rotors tilt in flight? It just looks too cumbersome. The transition from horizontal flight to vertical landing takes too long.
I urge you to come up with a better idea.. That's how we improve designs, by experimenting, if your idea works you could make lots of money, when you sell your better idea to the aircraft companies. so get busy! YOU CAN DO IT!
I don’t know why Russia and China haven’t copy this beautiful bird they’re good on copying America innovations
It's too sophisticated they can probably make something but every single one but crash look at all the problems we had with him in the beginning
It's usefulness is still kinda in question. And as a $36 billion program, I mean, you could design, build and operate an entire aircraft carrier for that amount of money.
How can I become a pilot for an Osprey?
I wouldn't if I were you
Sven Cas go to military college for the US navy or marine core and while in that be in rotc also every military college offers that and when 4 years is fine they will direct you through everything else and you will be guaranteed to be a pilot and fly but not 100 percent you will fly. But your not garunteed you will fly the aircraft u wanna. Or for the airforce you have to be smart and join the airforce. Jist do other research btw.
Win the lottery.
Nice heliplane.
I still say, a simpler design would be to locate the engines in the aircraft's center section driving one main transmission like every multiengine helicopter in the world, the only thing that needs to rotate at the wing tips, are gear boxes
The tips allow it to have bigger diameter props. And the new bell has the other thing
@@midgetman4206 The CH 47 chinook helicopter has larger diameter rotors yet, and they run via drive shafts and gear boxes.
@@Agislife1960 it serves a different purpose, It's a heavy lifter and remember that the V-22 has to rotate its wing for easier storage so shoving more stuff in the center adds complexity which adds weight
If anti aircraft fire hits one tiltrotor will the machine still fly.
Looks like army copies cod ya knowhahha😂😂
The unique design, the way of Rotating such heavy engines (more technical difficulties, ) is not so efficient, I think. Such heavy Engine part should not be rotated. That is my opinion. I wonder why they are not developing 4 routers version of much bigger one.
will the gunship version is coming ???
@Ali Mohsin ali le chimique ?
ou ali express
ou ali mc beal ?
non ali de Bae system ou ali badou
ali gonnes
ali express
ali j ai acheté un virus oups ????
These are DANGEROUS PERIOD!. MANY MANY CRASHES!.
If you base your assumption on "I saw a video once of one crashing" then you are correct. In reality, this aircraft is the fastest "helicopter" the US military has.
And those "many, many crashes!" happened during service development and early training, BEFORE the Corps figured out that either you start from scratch with training pilots, or you put Helicopter-rated pilots in there to transition. You DO NOT try to transition a highly-experienced, trained FIXED-Wing driver, in the command seat of a V-22 Osprey and say, after just a few hours, "Hey, you got this, man."
The Osprey is 'relatively' easy to fly on a simulator, but then again, so is a 747 or an F-18.
The V-22 is considered one of the safest military aircraft in our inventory. Instead of making unfounded claims, go do the research
Why do they use a Runway still ?
A short take off takes less fuel than a vertical takeoff. If you've got one, you use it; if you don't, it'll still get you up.
406,963 viewsDec 29, 2015
bruh, cv 22 is a carrier, wouldnt it be v-22c
CH 47 is a better aircraft it cost less, does more and is more reliable
WHY IT DOSN.T FLY VERTACALY WHILE IT HASE TOW ENGENS
who is the spy
Kapan chinok, apalagi osprey. Bagusnya beli satu baru kemudian kita tiru. Itu lho, kaya china.
.....It’s a damn good thing that’s you guys are not Engineers or this crap would never been invented...........it would still be laying on the top of the drawing board........
Let's be honest!! Too many people were killed during the test phase of this awkward looking machine! I've heard from some Marines that it's a terrorizing ride. What a bust!!! I wonder what states politician benefited from the push through of this disaster!! And at the cost of human lives! A crime it is!!!
Phil Hand
Please don't be scared of this machine.
It is the fastest helicopter in the marine corps.
If Thomas Selfridge had his way, you wouldn't be allowed to fly.
Phil your right,MANY have been killed in it ITS DANGEROUS!!.
Phil; let’s be honest, you probably haven’t actually spoken to any marines. This aircraft is one of the safest in our military’s inventory. Team members appreciate how rapidly we can get to their objective to execute the mission, and has continued to expand its capabilities. But for armchair jockeys to opine on things about which they know next to nothing, well; a crime it is.
Oh, here...you left some of these behind !!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !
Who signed off on building the osprey, it's a death trap with enough crashes to it's credit.
I don’t want to hurt your feelings but I’m gonna be honest with you.. when you hear about a crash and then go to RUclips & type in the word “V-22” and then make a baseless comment with your narrow perception, is not the right thing to do. the C5A galaxy killed 170 people in its first years and most of them were babies! The v22 is the worlds fastest helicopter it’s a dream machine for getting into a combat situation quickly and dropping off fighters when there is no runway. I fly in a helicopter every day (today I was above 9000 feet) I know the list of helicopter crashes in the last 20 years but I can know that in relation to the hours flown. The V-22 is no more deadly than any other military aircraft.. Please Google “operation baby lift” and ask why the C5A Galaxy is still in service.
Was hat ghemacht uinited state of America germany was machine? Und was machen covit jetz ohh unmoglich was hat ghemacht keine auge
USAF VET, why are we broadcasting the capabilities of these and all other technically advanced weaponry?
Our corporate weapons competition, outright and future enemies no longer need HUMIT we tell them, and show every single detail.
Our edge is not multiplicities for overwhelming, our edge is our technical advances and ingenuity.
Never before Bush 2 did we embed reporters who gave troop position, or allow this amount of technical info to be "given" squandering our R&D.
Obama gave our enemies notifications of all of the military goals two week's in advance, President Trump ends that and our force's stomped ISIs.
Maverick Rider
Nice shading on your asinine political comment. Three things...
1) If you think our enemies are getting their recon from youtube, you are stupid.
2) This video was produced by the DOD, and you are still stupid.
3) up till last week the US was flying Kurds on these aircraft & now they are our enemy, and you are still stupid.
And this one is free..
If you think the US has stopped ISIs... we didn't, we just changed their name, and you're stupid enough to believe the marketing.
@Tom Gulbranson I think the thing that got under my skin was the political comment. politics doesn't matter, and I don't want it on my channel. I accept that im a hot head, I yelled at a guy today for taking up two parking spaces. really... we had a long conversation and in the end he agreed that taking up two spaces makes him less of a man. I digress. The DOD released this video so they want people to be aware of our capabilities. it cost me "RUclips dollars" to block people, so I want people to comment but I won't tolerate political BS. PS. Maverick rider and I are probably aligned with the same political party. Tom, thank you for letting me explain, & I do feel a little better now.
An aircraft whose development cost dozens of lives.
Please name an experimental aircraft that didn't cost lives.
Even the Wright brothers killed a passenger in one of their first demonstration flights.
Its a price that is paid when we push the boundaries of possible.
That thing cannot glide or auto gyrate, you lose power only one way down, straight down.
robert colvin It can fly with an engine out as an aircraft. Even the CH-47, if it loses a gearbox cannot auto rotate.
I served in the Marines for over 20 years and as a combat tested Infantry Unit Leader (64-94); I was not ready to put my Marines on this death trap at the time. Yes, many lost their lives UNNECESSARILY because of someone allegedly withholding valuable flaw information about the aircraft. I'm pleased to learn those defects have been corrected. RIP Marines.
@@DevilDawg-mk7tg As an r&d drive systems test i found glaring defects the story we get in the news is usually far from truth.The ship we lost ar Pax River was flown from cold weather testing without the fairleads in the firewalls.A hydraulic line broke and started a fire the shaft was carbon fiber going to the overunning clutch and quickly burned through not allowing power from the opposite engine to turn the proprotor.Many believe it can fly on one engine.I was told in 97 they could hope to land at best.All the gearboxes were required to go 30 minutes without oil .We tested them and they would go one hour dry the paint burned off the bearings looked like raisins but they were tough.The shafts between tilt-axis gearboxes were a major weak point.The midwing gearbox shaft came straight out instead of the swept forward angle of the driveline.The couplings took up the difference 1.2 degrees of deflection was the limit 1.3 and they exploded.Titanium was too brittle.The shafts in the midwing gearbox should have been at the angle of the driveline.The engineer looked at me like i was crazy when i pointed this out my first day.I believe they were slow on purpose if it were fixed they would be out of a job.My responsibility as an a&p was the SAFETY of the aircraft and passengers.They were still breaking the couplings 2 years later when I took a job with.American Airlines.As a technician I would not have ridden on a V-22 then I sincerely hope they have improved .The marines were the ones that wanted this aircraft and kept it going.
9
Thinking like a bad guy, those things would be way to easy to shoot down. Everything about them are slow.
Its built with tactical gold lead with diamond tipped titanium armor
So very strong armor plating and they cant be detected by satellite
Slow compared to what?
Blackhawk speed: 357 km/h - Osprey speed: 565 km/h
Blackhawk range: 583 km - Osprey range: 1627 km
@@oodlesofnoodles4660 Thank you.
@@oodlesofnoodles4660 agreed and it's a tactical transport so it shouldn't need to go lighting fast
Guess tho D.O.D. figures we'll never go to war in a jungle again, because you ain't landing that thing anywhere. Not that it matters they rarely land right side up anyway.
JD L funny thing - ever heard of a Boeing-Vertol CH-47 "Chinook"? How about a Sikorsky HH-53 "Jolly Green Giant"?
BOTH of them were operational in a little place called Vietnam - which had everything from grasslands to jungle to mountain woodlands. About the only thing that was in limited supply was desert and snowfields.
Know your subjects before you spout off.
Gta 5 avenger
Que cosa más fea y no se como llamarlo, no creo que se alla exportado porque quien va a comprar algo tan feo y poco práctico porque debe estar todo el día en taller preparando, los complejos soportes de hélices
India. Bye. Apachi. Helecopter,s
2nd. Bye. This. Helecopter ,s.
power. Fully. Helecopter,s
These things still suck apparently.
They don’t, actually.
Yanks fly the osprey as if they are afraid. Should see how the Russki and Ukrainian fly the Hind.
a plane that has 0 advantages
waste of money
boredom ... boredom ... boredom!!! ... who edits youtube videos? nobody? 95% grassgrowing disinterest added to 5% ... insignificance .. booooring!
You are a gnat
death trap piece of shit, probably killed more very skilled airman then any other flying machine during its R&D. YOU WOULD NOT GET MY ASS IN THIS PIECE OF CRAP ESPECIALLY GOING INTO A HOT ZONE.
JUNK... BIG WASTE OF $... ITS A MONEY BAG THAT THINKS ITS A TANDOM ROTOR HELICOPTER FORCED TO FLY SIDEWAYS CONSTANTLY...
Billy Mondy? Is that you? Man, you’re the same negative p.o.s. you were in college! What are the odds...
Seen one of these at Miramar airbase, they look great but dnt know if it’s efficient in combat or ops.
ruclips.net/video/IbmuGWjC-RY/видео.html
It's not ! It already has a crash history and the killing of their entire marine crews.