Let us all be honest, The Original is the absolute best but this ain't to bad, Atleast it had them actually be Martians and octopus type, Take place in Britain, And have a Character called Ogilvy, And overall plot is very similar to the book it is just I REALLY do prefer the old Victorian setting and I don't mind a 1913 or 1938 setting, Just you know these old times, Though the fact the black kid (Dont remember his name) can mention the Tim Burton Movie Mars Attacks but not the War of the Worlds is somewhat of a crime
This really is a near-exact retelling of the original novel "War of the Worlds", and like with that, Ben informs them that the military has been completely exterminated in mere *days* at most; they could only put up a measily few days combat before they were completely eradicated in the course of the battle. In short, their entire nation's collapsed completely, any government officers who have survived have committed cowardice; those that fulfilled their duty are long-dead, or simply eaten by the Martians; and the ones who resist the aliens will inevitably meet the same fate... they have never had any chance from the start.
@@porg832 Ironically, the Martian administration that planned the invasion did a truly *horrible* job of equipping and training their troops: no medicine for the native diseases for one thing. I mean, basically all they did was hand the humans some of their hardware- via sending in penal battalions with no hope of survival; just instructions to do damage. No wonder they're classified properly as psychopaths: and no wonder they lost!
@@runa_das That's a most predictable result of an alien outright military invasion, but if resistance can continue, the simulations show that victory becomes certain, and the human society that remains becomes far stronger; so in the end it is a complete disaster for the aliens; as now their ability to remain secret is gone- and humanity, a species with a true natural genius for extermination of any kind of lifeform that gets in our way, now has them in our sights.
Dude your recaps are hilarious. You have to remind people to like and subscribe cause it’s easy to forget and your videos are great. Thanks for the hard work. I appreciate it
well atleast the 05 version made sence for why the military couldnt fight back. This one appeared to have no shields and were weak enough to be taken down by a hand grenade. why the couldn't the military take them down with ease.
In the book its set in like 1800s or something and sense this is semi faithful its a lil weird i kinda agree but these are also more agile like in the book and could probably gallop/run like in the books too
The tripods from the radio play and original book didn't have shields either - consider that Welles wrote the book between 1895 and 1897, but the first mention of a forcefield or similar device didn't occur until 1931. Instead, the aliens relied on a much more understandable _(for the general public of the day)_ form of protection: Armour. Consider how destructive a 20mm cannon was against a big tank in WWII _(AArghh! Tony's head just turned in to pink mist, there's a fist sized hole where Dave's face should be, and we're on fire!)_ compared to what that same cannon shout would do to a slab of Chobham _(fcuk sake, I've repainted the turret twice this month already, someone else can do it this time)._ The grenade thing is glaringly obvious: go and get two balloons, make sure they're identical, and lay them flat on your desk, uninflated. Pick one up, and destroy it by blowing _in to the inside_ of it, count how many puffs it takes you. Now destroy the other one by blowing _on the outside_ of it, and count how many puffs _that_ takes, and compare the two.
Although the movie wasn't the best, im glad it kept the og book in mind and mostly faithfully followed it even if the thunderchild scene was kinda goofy lol
It's good to see that H.G. Wells' classic SF story is still inspiring folk to adapt it. Without seeing the whole thing, I don't know the details, but in the main, this one looks at least half decent. OK, so it doesn't follow the actual story very closely, but then, it has been modernised. The protagonist in Wells' original tale has been replaced by three students, you still have the doctor, the religious man ( a curate in the book) and a military man ( who suffered a deep inferiority complex when he saw what was happening). Yet, the ships, tripods and red weed come from Mars, the Martians are octopus like, and perhaps best of all, having brought at least London, if not the world, to its knees, the Martians die from all the various bacteria, viruses and other pathogens that fill our planet alongside us... with strong hints that, given time, the Martians might be able to adapt to them! A film doesn't have to be a big budget blockbuster to be good- think 'Monsters'. Don't get me wrong, because I loved Spielberg's adaptation,, but some adaptations work better than others. The latest offering from the BBC had good creatures and special effects, but made some awful errors. Whilst placing it in its period setting (the Victorian era) it tried to 'update' things by turning the protagonist into an unmarried mother, and getting all moralistic on certain topics, which wouldn't have been seen as an issue then. The result was stodgy and mostly unappealing even to die hard SF fans. There was another adaptation that came out just afterward, but whilst I've heard about it, I haven't seen it or heard very much about it, so wonder how well it did. This adaptation, however, seems to have taken the basic elements of the story and filled the rest in with its own ideas. It looks like it didn't go overboard trying to add anything extra, and though set in a modern day, didn't try to add on modern moral values, at least that I can see. They say less is more, and in this instance, it seems they got it just about right!
@@SirKolass It's in no way a ripoff of the goofy 2005 movie, don't get me wrong 2005 is better in terms of well effects and i guess designs though i didn't find the tripods here that shitty but i believe the reason its half decent as some say is because of how faithful it is to the book which is better then both movies lol.
@@sandrahughes4117 Not a ripoff, an adaptation. They still came up with their own ideas for it. This movie just basically copied the 2005 one, and it's quite easy to tell if you're not blind. Take the BBC movie for example, not the greatest design, but their did their own thing.
@@tomdelvetto9906 I in fact have read the book my dear friend, when i wrote my comment what i referred to was : the elements from the original novel that made it into the film , for example the insane Curate and the way they met him on a boat , in the book the narrator met the Curate on a boat after the attack on Weybridge by the Martians , the Artilleryman who the main characters offered food and drink when they first met him in the same manner the narrator did the same thing in his house in Maybury Hill , also the fact that some of the names for the main characters are also from the book , for example Ogilvy , the main character's name is a reference to the Author H.G. Wells , i could go on and on with the elements that i recognised from the novel that did in fact make it in the film but we would be here all day , i can also inform you that i have read the authorised Sequel to the novel , "The Massacre Of Mankind" wich is from Mrs. Elphinstone's point of view as she recollects her own eyewtiness account of the brutal Martian Blitzkrieg that she and many around the globe witnessed , both books were a good read and very enjoyable.
That was just an urban legend. The broadcast didn't actually have a whole lot of listeners at the time. The idea that there was a mass panic from the radio broadcast was just a faux article that newspapers wrote to sell more papers.
Nice little easter eggs there; Ogilvy, Herbert, using the actual Horshall Common, the mental pastor, the Artilleryman etc etc. But yet ANOTHER War of the Worlds ignoring the most BADASS scene in the book: HMS Thunderchild taking down three Tripods
This was so cinematic and well made, I just wish the VFX/CGI was more realistic. Ngl it kinda looks like something I could do if I had the time lololol
"Sir, these walking giant squid-looking machines are vulnerable to our weapons." "Well that's not fair to the story... quick! Charge right at them instead of using range to our advantage!!!"
After all that time, i still ask myself, why have they never tried to make the Machines stumble?! they got 3 Legs, and are definitely not capable of walking on 2 Legs alone... And why have they never considered Mines, if they can blow them up from "inside their Shields"?
Yeah; in the British teleseries "The Tripods" they brought down a tripod just by sabotaging one of its legs and making it fall down. Anything that walks can be brought down with any number of traps. But that ignores the basic plot device of Martians on tripods, like Wells envisioned. The 1954 "War of the Worlds" probably answered these issues best, and that's why it's so endearing. The Martian war machines float above the ground on electromagnetic "legs" that can't be broken, they have shields to prevent conventional attacks, and they have heat rays and skeleton beams that can't be defended against.
The way these forms of media attack the faith is absolutely despicable! Many have accepted faith and hold to their beliefs very personally. These attacks and forms of mockery by these forms of media is really just uncalled for tbh. Smh!
Films always misunderstood the whole military aspect of the tripods - the heat ray was impressive but it didnt match with the raw strength of the human forces - sheer numbers and being able to defend dug in positions. The martians are actually brought to a halt in the book and the only reason they break through human lines is due to their use of black gas - something that the humans have no defence against. After that its just a matter of tidying up. So we either get tripods that are somehow magically immune to everything, or humans who are completely incompetent and only seem to turn up with a handful of their actual forces. Its such a shame as the story is so much better when told as it is, as that both respects the human military and is all the more crushing when what could have been an actual victory for them is surprisingly flipped by martian adaptation.
Tbh after the 2005 war of the worlds every future adaptation of war of the worlds was based around the 2005 version and not really the original novel (except 1 movie but that one is hard to even find and has barely been archived)
I wouldn't call this a sequel as both movies are retellings of HG Wells' original book from the like 1899. This one, with the exception of time setting, and again no HMS Thuderchild (😢), is a more accurate retelling of the book.
I love that someone’s name is Wellsin this movie. Finally a reference to the acual creator of the war of the worlds! Edit: didn’t realize but ogilvie and the priest!
YES!!! THANK YOU!!!! The ONLY version of War of the Worlds which actually DOES include her is the Jeff Wayne musical, why does EVERY other version not include her??
you can't really have an invasion from mars set in the 21st century, pretending that we don't know what's on mars and haven't landed multiple missions on it.
Well, more Mars probes, orbiters and landers have mysteriously failed than on all the other planets put together. More than a 50% mission failure rate on Mars and no decent explanation as to why...... I agree it's implausible, but I still wouldn't say the possibility exists 🤔
This looks great actually. The 05 war of the worlds though was, pivitable and standard setting. I'd love another story in that world, just following new survivors rather than following Tom cruise.
I refuse to believe that the humans would still lose having nukes available, it's pretty hard to believe that humans would lose against aliens considering modern technology
In the original war of the worlds, the tripods could be taken out by artillery so modern weapons would wreck them, that said a actual alien invasion could win mostly by just dropping rocks from orbit on all major resistance points.@@wackydude101
You really do see the dilemma for filmakers nowadays making these alien invasion movies.....while even low budget flicks can put out impressive special effects such as this movie...and they are very good hats off to the CGI team on this movie...where you can see the problem is with....people. they just dont have the budget to have lots of people milling around such as would happen in an invasion and the streets seem sterile despite the invasion which just sort of takes away from the movie somehow. still, they did a great job.
Isn’t this just the English version of war of the worlds but more modern but it’s just in London also and yeah basically the only difference is it’s more modern and less vehicle tax because even the old man part is the same
Oh yeah, it’s funny as in the American version of it the man has a shotgun, but in the British version the man has a shank and England is known for their knives in America is known for their guns
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Movie recap: War of the Worlds: The Attack (2023)
@@A2kry the 05 is the only best war of the worlds
@Kry Fam the original novel was British, set in the UK
This is basically if the 2005 film was more book accurate lol
@@Inscryption9the musical is my fav
Ayyyyyyy bet bro got his movie good
"The creature in the bushes turns out to be a blood-thirsty monster: British Artillery soldier Ben."
Instant sub
the most dangerous creature is already close to you
if you saw it hen it already heard you.
as a person who watched the movie and hated it, this line made me love this recap
and they were right ben was indeed a monster taking out the tripod like that
a GIANT ZOIDBERG ! RUN !
The soldiers: Yes! We killed it! The world is safe!!!
Other tripods in the distance: *allow us to introduce ourselves*
The movie: 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@AdhvaithSane they literally copied the 2005 design just with like 1000 more tentacles so yeah ur right.. kinda
war of woods: shitcunt 2023 2077 version
@@schaserneo and what? yeah it might look kinda bad compared to 2005 but its not made by large studio and steven spielberg
@@Dripmarckmovie wasnt bad but wasnt great
High tech jets and missiles are useless , but a grenade takes them out ….
It be like that sometimes
It’s because it goes inside where the aliens operate the machine beyond their shield and kills them.
Droidicas are the same
Tbh I doesn’t make sense
*inside
Wait, so these tripods don't have magic force fields yet they still roll over a modern military? How?
plot armor 😂😂😂
Maybe they have more durable armor, because they DID blow one up, but were still overwhelmed
There are 2 explanations of this:
1.Black Hole Physics
2.Magic
Quantum-armour with a quantum-generator with quantum-weapons
Because the writing of the story says so :)
Let us all be honest, The Original is the absolute best but this ain't to bad, Atleast it had them actually be Martians and octopus type, Take place in Britain, And have a Character called Ogilvy, And overall plot is very similar to the book it is just I REALLY do prefer the old Victorian setting and I don't mind a 1913 or 1938 setting, Just you know these old times, Though the fact the black kid (Dont remember his name) can mention the Tim Burton Movie Mars Attacks but not the War of the Worlds is somewhat of a crime
Fictional scenario rule 1: There's no fictional version of the scenario you are in right now
tripod
'A distant relative of Cthulhu and Dr Zoidberg'-wonderful-you have a great future ahead of you.
You caught that!! That was awesome! 😆 🤣 😂
No. You are awesome.
Have a nice day
@visitante 2050 only if you have one too
That's when I subscribed 😂
😂😅 Holy shit, that was so funny dude lol
**astronomer opens door**
Alien: Tf bro im dressing up
tripod
This really is a near-exact retelling of the original novel "War of the Worlds", and like with that, Ben informs them that the military has been completely exterminated in mere *days* at most; they could only put up a measily few days combat before they were completely eradicated in the course of the battle. In short, their entire nation's collapsed completely, any government officers who have survived have committed cowardice; those that fulfilled their duty are long-dead, or simply eaten by the Martians; and the ones who resist the aliens will inevitably meet the same fate... they have never had any chance from the start.
Exactly.
@@porg832 Ironically, the Martian administration that planned the invasion did a truly *horrible* job of equipping and training their troops: no medicine for the native diseases for one thing.
I mean, basically all they did was hand the humans some of their hardware- via sending in penal battalions with no hope of survival; just instructions to do damage.
No wonder they're classified properly as psychopaths: and no wonder they lost!
Exactly
@@runa_das That's a most predictable result of an alien outright military invasion, but if resistance can continue, the simulations show that victory becomes certain, and the human society that remains becomes far stronger; so in the end it is a complete disaster for the aliens; as now their ability to remain secret is gone- and humanity, a species with a true natural genius for extermination of any kind of lifeform that gets in our way, now has them in our sights.
exactly
Dude your recaps are hilarious. You have to remind people to like and subscribe cause it’s easy to forget and your videos are great. Thanks for the hard work. I appreciate it
Doctor Zoidberg
Great? They sound like a Chinese operating instruction sheet translated to Spanish, then English🤣
tripod
well atleast the 05 version made sence for why the military couldnt fight back. This one appeared to have no shields and were weak enough to be taken down by a hand grenade. why the couldn't the military take them down with ease.
i think they inspired the 2005 when ray was ubducted and the red tentacle took Ray, then Ray pulled the pin when getting ubducted
These ones were more agile and able to shoot down Aircraft’s, unlike the 2005 ones that could only vaporize stuff on the ground
In the book its set in like 1800s or something and sense this is semi faithful its a lil weird i kinda agree but these are also more agile like in the book and could probably gallop/run like in the books too
i’m pretty sure they had no shields in the book.
The tripods from the radio play and original book didn't have shields either - consider that Welles wrote the book between 1895 and 1897, but the first mention of a forcefield or similar device didn't occur until 1931. Instead, the aliens relied on a much more understandable _(for the general public of the day)_ form of protection: Armour. Consider how destructive a 20mm cannon was against a big tank in WWII _(AArghh! Tony's head just turned in to pink mist, there's a fist sized hole where Dave's face should be, and we're on fire!)_ compared to what that same cannon shout would do to a slab of Chobham _(fcuk sake, I've repainted the turret twice this month already, someone else can do it this time)._ The grenade thing is glaringly obvious: go and get two balloons, make sure they're identical, and lay them flat on your desk, uninflated. Pick one up, and destroy it by blowing _in to the inside_ of it, count how many puffs it takes you. Now destroy the other one by blowing _on the outside_ of it, and count how many puffs _that_ takes, and compare the two.
i like the minor humor while keeping the recaps professional lmao
"a martian tripod shows up next and proceeds to do its martian tripod business" 4:29
I laughed at that part 😂@@vegemite6
it's a pretty good film, if you don't compare it with Spielberg's version.
I'd compare this to scary movie 4
@@KevinSanchez-om8po fr scary movie 4 is better in the way it shows the inside of the tripods
I’d be inclined to compare it to George Pal’s version…
.
If you don't compare it to any good movie, it is a masterpiece 😂
Although the movie wasn't the best, im glad it kept the og book in mind and mostly faithfully followed it
even if the thunderchild scene was kinda goofy lol
When you look at it, this is actually the most accurate representation of War of the Worlds set in modern day London.
0:05 Its not a good look when the helpless civilians in your movie look like they're going on a leisurely jog.
It's good to see that H.G. Wells' classic SF story is still inspiring folk to adapt it. Without seeing the whole thing, I don't know the details, but in the main, this one looks at least half decent. OK, so it doesn't follow the actual story very closely, but then, it has been modernised. The protagonist in Wells' original tale has been replaced by three students, you still have the doctor, the religious man ( a curate in the book) and a military man ( who suffered a deep inferiority complex when he saw what was happening). Yet, the ships, tripods and red weed come from Mars, the Martians are octopus like, and perhaps best of all, having brought at least London, if not the world, to its knees, the Martians die from all the various bacteria, viruses and other pathogens that fill our planet alongside us... with strong hints that, given time, the Martians might be able to adapt to them!
A film doesn't have to be a big budget blockbuster to be good- think 'Monsters'. Don't get me wrong, because I loved Spielberg's adaptation,, but some adaptations work better than others. The latest offering from the BBC had good creatures and special effects, but made some awful errors. Whilst placing it in its period setting (the Victorian era) it tried to 'update' things by turning the protagonist into an unmarried mother, and getting all moralistic on certain topics, which wouldn't have been seen as an issue then. The result was stodgy and mostly unappealing even to die hard SF fans. There was another adaptation that came out just afterward, but whilst I've heard about it, I haven't seen it or heard very much about it, so wonder how well it did.
This adaptation, however, seems to have taken the basic elements of the story and filled the rest in with its own ideas. It looks like it didn't go overboard trying to add anything extra, and though set in a modern day, didn't try to add on modern moral values, at least that I can see. They say less is more, and in this instance, it seems they got it just about right!
This is not an adaption, it's obviously a ripoff from the 2005 movie, as well as "Arrival". How can you call this garbage half decent 😂
@@SirKolass It's in no way a ripoff of the goofy 2005 movie, don't get me wrong 2005 is better in terms of well effects and i guess designs though i didn't find the tripods here that shitty but i believe the reason its half decent as some say is because of how faithful it is to the book which is better then both movies lol.
@@SirKolasswait until you find out that the 2005 movie was a rip off of the book
@@sandrahughes4117 Not a ripoff, an adaptation. They still came up with their own ideas for it. This movie just basically copied the 2005 one, and it's quite easy to tell if you're not blind.
Take the BBC movie for example, not the greatest design, but their did their own thing.
@@SirKolassit's actually for the most part a retelling of the book
"Offended by the small caliber" I almost spit out lauging. Great one.
tripod
"it appears to be a blood thirsty monster, british artillery soldier ben." mf got me laughin' 😂
“Straddled on their precious pedal machines, the astronomers head into town.”
What? 🤣
seeing how accurate this is to the book it gives me enthusiasm
Have you even read the book? If you want book accurate watch either of the war of the worlds movies made by pendragon studios
@@tomdelvetto9906 I in fact have read the book my dear friend, when i wrote my comment what i referred to was : the elements from the original novel that made it into the film , for example the insane Curate and the way they met him on a boat , in the book the narrator met the Curate on a boat after the attack on Weybridge by the Martians , the Artilleryman who the main characters offered food and drink when they first met him in the same manner the narrator did the same thing in his house in Maybury Hill , also the fact that some of the names for the main characters are also from the book , for example Ogilvy , the main character's name is a reference to the Author H.G. Wells , i could go on and on with the elements that i recognised from the novel that did in fact make it in the film but we would be here all day , i can also inform you that i have read the authorised Sequel to the novel , "The Massacre Of Mankind" wich is from Mrs. Elphinstone's point of view as she recollects her own eyewtiness account of the brutal Martian Blitzkrieg that she and many around the globe witnessed , both books were a good read and very enjoyable.
ah yes I remember when the British army had T-90A tanks in its military 4:33
Great Britain is communist in the future 💀
Why is there No HMS Thunder Child?
Your narration is TOP NOTCH!!
No. You are top notch.
Have a nice day
@@visitante-pc5zc profound
Didn't Orson Wells scare the daylights out of everyone with the "War of The Worlds" radio broadcast on Halloween once?😊
1937
That was just an urban legend. The broadcast didn't actually have a whole lot of listeners at the time. The idea that there was a mass panic from the radio broadcast was just a faux article that newspapers wrote to sell more papers.
@@rosaamarillo2110
Actually, October 31st 1938...
Maybe. Some sources said that it was exagerated by the newspapers so the radio reputation as a news giver would be tainted.
Nice little easter eggs there; Ogilvy, Herbert, using the actual Horshall Common, the mental pastor, the Artilleryman etc etc. But yet ANOTHER War of the Worlds ignoring the most BADASS scene in the book: HMS Thunderchild taking down three Tripods
actually 5
This was so cinematic and well made, I just wish the VFX/CGI was more realistic. Ngl it kinda looks like something I could do if I had the time lololol
2:30 I find it really weird how the visual effects are extremely amateur in one shot but then incredibly well done in the next
POV: when the deadlines were so bad you had to split works between different contractors ;)
Precious pedal machines. Heh. That's one way to call a bicycle.
Aliens caught covid, too. 😂
😆 🤣 😂
"Sir, these walking giant squid-looking machines are vulnerable to our weapons."
"Well that's not fair to the story... quick! Charge right at them instead of using range to our advantage!!!"
After all that time, i still ask myself, why have they never tried to make the Machines stumble?! they got 3 Legs, and are definitely not capable of walking on 2 Legs alone...
And why have they never considered Mines, if they can blow them up from "inside their Shields"?
Yeah; in the British teleseries "The Tripods" they brought down a tripod just by sabotaging one of its legs and making it fall down. Anything that walks can be brought down with any number of traps. But that ignores the basic plot device of Martians on tripods, like Wells envisioned. The 1954 "War of the Worlds" probably answered these issues best, and that's why it's so endearing. The Martian war machines float above the ground on electromagnetic "legs" that can't be broken, they have shields to prevent conventional attacks, and they have heat rays and skeleton beams that can't be defended against.
Grab a bunch of snowspeeders
"We have war of the worlds 2005 at home"
War of the worlds 2005 at home:
im gonna be honest, war of the worlds 2005 was hot ass
@@JamaicanSandlerNo one liked your comment LMAO
A story how Nurgle saved Earth from an alien invasion
Papa nurgle always here to save -corrupt- the day
@@CB-rq1vo all hail papa Nurgle
4:31 oh, yes, the Martian tripod going to do its Martian tripod business
Ok...I love all the comedy ad-libs you do while summarizing the movie lol
Yooo another tripod les gooooo. Reminds me of the tripod from 2005
(These goobers traumatize me but i love them still)
“Pedal machines” - Gotta love A.I scripts! 😂
The way these forms of media attack the faith is absolutely despicable! Many have accepted faith and hold to their beliefs very personally. These attacks and forms of mockery by these forms of media is really just uncalled for tbh. Smh!
The way the alien vaporize the victims look more scary than the 2005 movie
More accurate to the book too.
“Pedel machine” (bike)
"He finds a whole bunch of nothing in the woods" 😂
Films always misunderstood the whole military aspect of the tripods - the heat ray was impressive but it didnt match with the raw strength of the human forces - sheer numbers and being able to defend dug in positions. The martians are actually brought to a halt in the book and the only reason they break through human lines is due to their use of black gas - something that the humans have no defence against. After that its just a matter of tidying up.
So we either get tripods that are somehow magically immune to everything, or humans who are completely incompetent and only seem to turn up with a handful of their actual forces. Its such a shame as the story is so much better when told as it is, as that both respects the human military and is all the more crushing when what could have been an actual victory for them is surprisingly flipped by martian adaptation.
Mum can we have war of the worlds?
No we have war of the worlds at home.
War of the worlds at home:
Tbh after the 2005 war of the worlds every future adaptation of war of the worlds was based around the 2005 version and not really the original novel (except 1 movie but that one is hard to even find and has barely been archived)
I'd like to see a movie version of The Great Martian War, 1913-1917.
"Martian" Im Just Trying To Correct Your Comment
@@JeffWayneTWOTWFan1322 Thanks, fixed it.
@@JeffWayneTWOTWFan1322brother..?
@@jeffwaynetripod169Don’t u understand that he said that he fixed the comment?
@@Iamloneley I'm meaning that he's my "Brother" idiot.
when the hell did War Of the Worlds get a sequel.
I wouldn't call this a sequel as both movies are retellings of HG Wells' original book from the like 1899. This one, with the exception of time setting, and again no HMS Thuderchild (😢), is a more accurate retelling of the book.
@@airplanenut89 This junk is basically a ripoff from the 2005 movie with added book elements.
I am glad that the Crazy Priest got what came for him: Death.
“Cathulu and Dr. Zoidberg”
How many times is this movie going to be made?
Military Alliance vs The Imperial Alien Empire Forces
Cool comment
"He finds a whole bunch of nothing in the woods" :)))
At least, the movie takes place in England...
POV: the 2005 tripods didn’t do good enough so they sent in a downgrade to kill them-aka 2005 tripods looked cooler
7:48 damn this is probably the best way to do a recap of a movie, straight up roasting the characters 💀
that one tripod that got shot by the artillery man and blown up:HEY MAN IM OFFENDED NOW.
Fun fact: If birds are surrounding a tripod, it means the immune system is weak and it can be taken down by heavy artillery
"Mom their back again -_-" Mom: "WDYM THEIR BACK????
2:41 Pedal machines 💀 ? I feel like the entire script is generated by ai. Why not just call the bikes?
Man this was too funny I loved this! Thank you!
문어 숙회. 마싯는데. 이분들에겐 공포의 대상인감.
Still cannot beat, 2005.
I love that someone’s name is Wellsin this movie. Finally a reference to the acual creator of the war of the worlds! Edit: didn’t realize but ogilvie and the priest!
*I couldn't help but notice that the guns and missiles did nothing to the horrifying tripod while the most simple bacteria killed it*
They always skip Thunderchild 😢
I like to head-canon it as the event happening, but from another character's POV
In the novel, it was the author's brother
@@toainsully true
Me: chilling
Alien ships: lands and starts to invade
Me: we come in peace welcome to our planet
4:32 a martian tripod shows up and does its martian tripod business😂
4:45 the tanks shown are literally T-72s 💀
T-90s but yeah I know right, so shit lmao
I think they are T90As
Why did they not include the HMS Thunderchild (in the sense of a scene with a ship valiantly fighting against the tripods)
I feel that it would've happened from the POV of one of the characters' siblings
YES!!! THANK YOU!!!! The ONLY version of War of the Worlds which actually DOES include her is the Jeff Wayne musical, why does EVERY other version not include her??
I notice these tripods look like the squiddies from The Matrix, with 3 legs.
you can't really have an invasion from mars set in the 21st century, pretending that we don't know what's on mars and haven't landed multiple missions on it.
Well, more Mars probes, orbiters and landers have mysteriously failed than on all the other planets put together. More than a 50% mission failure rate on Mars and no decent explanation as to why...... I agree it's implausible, but I still wouldn't say the possibility exists 🤔
The British tank is the challenger tank not the t-90.
I prefer the 2005 version gotta love that matrix sentinel tripod
“Martian tripod business" Bro 💀😭
You should be the most famous RUclipsr
You have my Subscribe and thumb-up for very colorful additions in recap.
1:56 how they just stand there, like they see this everyday LOL
So well explained, dictated or red.., almost no need to watch the movie! Thanks pal
This looks great actually. The 05 war of the worlds though was, pivitable and standard setting. I'd love another story in that world, just following new survivors rather than following Tom cruise.
THX FOR THE RECAP! i needed spoilers
do one on the 2005 wotw
Next time please upload in 4k
War of the world Walmart version
However with the exception of no HMS Thunderchild is a more accurate retelling of the original 1898 book.
Tesco value
I really like War of the worlds
But The Film Studios Turned It Down Saying That It Would Still Be Far Too Expensive To Even Contemplate Trying To Make.
I refuse to believe that the humans would still lose having nukes available, it's pretty hard to believe that humans would lose against aliens considering modern technology
In the 1953 movie they drop an atomic bomb on them, a group of machines cluster together to increase thier shields power to withstand the blast.
In the original war of the worlds, the tripods could be taken out by artillery so modern weapons would wreck them, that said a actual alien invasion could win mostly by just dropping rocks from orbit on all major resistance points.@@wackydude101
The humans look do adorable fighting the tripods
You really do see the dilemma for filmakers nowadays making these alien invasion movies.....while even low budget flicks can put out impressive special effects such as this movie...and they are very good hats off to the CGI team on this movie...where you can see the problem is with....people. they just dont have the budget to have lots of people milling around such as would happen in an invasion and the streets seem sterile despite the invasion which just sort of takes away from the movie somehow. still, they did a great job.
Isn’t this just the English version of war of the worlds but more modern but it’s just in London also and yeah basically the only difference is it’s more modern and less vehicle tax because even the old man part is the same
Oh yeah, it’s funny as in the American version of it the man has a shotgun, but in the British version the man has a shank and England is known for their knives in America is known for their guns
Didn't know feces makes a durable building material.
You should see mine after I shit bricks...😉
i love the sarcasm
The First Great Martian war : **minecraft cave sound**
The best part of living in Australia 🇦🇺 , is , the Northern hemisphere will go first and give us down here plenty of time to get sorted .
proceeds to do its alien tripod business
Dr Zoidberg !!😂😂
What’s wild about the tripods in war of the worlds is that that don’t die to the entire army fighting them but rather *drumroll* human germs
Twigs, sticks, feces...?What you having for breakfast,dide ?
Is this on amazon prime or Netflix please let me know
Its just a normal day in london man whats wrong with it?!?
I just want an adaptation of the White Mountains books
BBC 1970's "THE TRIPODS"