This really is a near-exact retelling of the original novel "War of the Worlds", and like with that, Ben informs them that the military has been completely exterminated in mere *days* at most; they could only put up a measily few days combat before they were completely eradicated in the course of the battle. In short, their entire nation's collapsed completely, any government officers who have survived have committed cowardice; those that fulfilled their duty are long-dead, or simply eaten by the Martians; and the ones who resist the aliens will inevitably meet the same fate... they have never had any chance from the start.
@@porg832 Ironically, the Martian administration that planned the invasion did a truly *horrible* job of equipping and training their troops: no medicine for the native diseases for one thing. I mean, basically all they did was hand the humans some of their hardware- via sending in penal battalions with no hope of survival; just instructions to do damage. No wonder they're classified properly as psychopaths: and no wonder they lost!
@@runa_das That's a most predictable result of an alien outright military invasion, but if resistance can continue, the simulations show that victory becomes certain, and the human society that remains becomes far stronger; so in the end it is a complete disaster for the aliens; as now their ability to remain secret is gone- and humanity, a species with a true natural genius for extermination of any kind of lifeform that gets in our way, now has them in our sights.
Let us all be honest, The Original is the absolute best but this ain't to bad, Atleast it had them actually be Martians and octopus type, Take place in Britain, And have a Character called Ogilvy, And overall plot is very similar to the book it is just I REALLY do prefer the old Victorian setting and I don't mind a 1913 or 1938 setting, Just you know these old times, Though the fact the black kid (Dont remember his name) can mention the Tim Burton Movie Mars Attacks but not the War of the Worlds is somewhat of a crime
Dude your recaps are hilarious. You have to remind people to like and subscribe cause it’s easy to forget and your videos are great. Thanks for the hard work. I appreciate it
well atleast the 05 version made sence for why the military couldnt fight back. This one appeared to have no shields and were weak enough to be taken down by a hand grenade. why the couldn't the military take them down with ease.
In the book its set in like 1800s or something and sense this is semi faithful its a lil weird i kinda agree but these are also more agile like in the book and could probably gallop/run like in the books too
The tripods from the radio play and original book didn't have shields either - consider that Welles wrote the book between 1895 and 1897, but the first mention of a forcefield or similar device didn't occur until 1931. Instead, the aliens relied on a much more understandable _(for the general public of the day)_ form of protection: Armour. Consider how destructive a 20mm cannon was against a big tank in WWII _(AArghh! Tony's head just turned in to pink mist, there's a fist sized hole where Dave's face should be, and we're on fire!)_ compared to what that same cannon shout would do to a slab of Chobham _(fcuk sake, I've repainted the turret twice this month already, someone else can do it this time)._ The grenade thing is glaringly obvious: go and get two balloons, make sure they're identical, and lay them flat on your desk, uninflated. Pick one up, and destroy it by blowing _in to the inside_ of it, count how many puffs it takes you. Now destroy the other one by blowing _on the outside_ of it, and count how many puffs _that_ takes, and compare the two.
It's good to see that H.G. Wells' classic SF story is still inspiring folk to adapt it. Without seeing the whole thing, I don't know the details, but in the main, this one looks at least half decent. OK, so it doesn't follow the actual story very closely, but then, it has been modernised. The protagonist in Wells' original tale has been replaced by three students, you still have the doctor, the religious man ( a curate in the book) and a military man ( who suffered a deep inferiority complex when he saw what was happening). Yet, the ships, tripods and red weed come from Mars, the Martians are octopus like, and perhaps best of all, having brought at least London, if not the world, to its knees, the Martians die from all the various bacteria, viruses and other pathogens that fill our planet alongside us... with strong hints that, given time, the Martians might be able to adapt to them! A film doesn't have to be a big budget blockbuster to be good- think 'Monsters'. Don't get me wrong, because I loved Spielberg's adaptation,, but some adaptations work better than others. The latest offering from the BBC had good creatures and special effects, but made some awful errors. Whilst placing it in its period setting (the Victorian era) it tried to 'update' things by turning the protagonist into an unmarried mother, and getting all moralistic on certain topics, which wouldn't have been seen as an issue then. The result was stodgy and mostly unappealing even to die hard SF fans. There was another adaptation that came out just afterward, but whilst I've heard about it, I haven't seen it or heard very much about it, so wonder how well it did. This adaptation, however, seems to have taken the basic elements of the story and filled the rest in with its own ideas. It looks like it didn't go overboard trying to add anything extra, and though set in a modern day, didn't try to add on modern moral values, at least that I can see. They say less is more, and in this instance, it seems they got it just about right!
@@SirKolass It's in no way a ripoff of the goofy 2005 movie, don't get me wrong 2005 is better in terms of well effects and i guess designs though i didn't find the tripods here that shitty but i believe the reason its half decent as some say is because of how faithful it is to the book which is better then both movies lol.
@@tomdelvetto9906 I in fact have read the book my dear friend, when i wrote my comment what i referred to was : the elements from the original novel that made it into the film , for example the insane Curate and the way they met him on a boat , in the book the narrator met the Curate on a boat after the attack on Weybridge by the Martians , the Artilleryman who the main characters offered food and drink when they first met him in the same manner the narrator did the same thing in his house in Maybury Hill , also the fact that some of the names for the main characters are also from the book , for example Ogilvy , the main character's name is a reference to the Author H.G. Wells , i could go on and on with the elements that i recognised from the novel that did in fact make it in the film but we would be here all day , i can also inform you that i have read the authorised Sequel to the novel , "The Massacre Of Mankind" wich is from Mrs. Elphinstone's point of view as she recollects her own eyewtiness account of the brutal Martian Blitzkrieg that she and many around the globe witnessed , both books were a good read and very enjoyable.
That was just an urban legend. The broadcast didn't actually have a whole lot of listeners at the time. The idea that there was a mass panic from the radio broadcast was just a faux article that newspapers wrote to sell more papers.
This was so cinematic and well made, I just wish the VFX/CGI was more realistic. Ngl it kinda looks like something I could do if I had the time lololol
Nice little easter eggs there; Ogilvy, Herbert, using the actual Horshall Common, the mental pastor, the Artilleryman etc etc. But yet ANOTHER War of the Worlds ignoring the most BADASS scene in the book: HMS Thunderchild taking down three Tripods
After all that time, i still ask myself, why have they never tried to make the Machines stumble?! they got 3 Legs, and are definitely not capable of walking on 2 Legs alone... And why have they never considered Mines, if they can blow them up from "inside their Shields"?
Yeah; in the British teleseries "The Tripods" they brought down a tripod just by sabotaging one of its legs and making it fall down. Anything that walks can be brought down with any number of traps. But that ignores the basic plot device of Martians on tripods, like Wells envisioned. The 1954 "War of the Worlds" probably answered these issues best, and that's why it's so endearing. The Martian war machines float above the ground on electromagnetic "legs" that can't be broken, they have shields to prevent conventional attacks, and they have heat rays and skeleton beams that can't be defended against.
"Sir, these walking giant squid-looking machines are vulnerable to our weapons." "Well that's not fair to the story... quick! Charge right at them instead of using range to our advantage!!!"
I wouldn't call this a sequel as both movies are retellings of HG Wells' original book from the like 1899. This one, with the exception of time setting, and again no HMS Thuderchild (😢), is a more accurate retelling of the book.
Tbh after the 2005 war of the worlds every future adaptation of war of the worlds was based around the 2005 version and not really the original novel (except 1 movie but that one is hard to even find and has barely been archived)
Films always misunderstood the whole military aspect of the tripods - the heat ray was impressive but it didnt match with the raw strength of the human forces - sheer numbers and being able to defend dug in positions. The martians are actually brought to a halt in the book and the only reason they break through human lines is due to their use of black gas - something that the humans have no defence against. After that its just a matter of tidying up. So we either get tripods that are somehow magically immune to everything, or humans who are completely incompetent and only seem to turn up with a handful of their actual forces. Its such a shame as the story is so much better when told as it is, as that both respects the human military and is all the more crushing when what could have been an actual victory for them is surprisingly flipped by martian adaptation.
you can't really have an invasion from mars set in the 21st century, pretending that we don't know what's on mars and haven't landed multiple missions on it.
Well, more Mars probes, orbiters and landers have mysteriously failed than on all the other planets put together. More than a 50% mission failure rate on Mars and no decent explanation as to why...... I agree it's implausible, but I still wouldn't say the possibility exists 🤔
the ending in which theres an egg that survived. means that one of the eggs had a mutation in the genes, which means they can repel the bacteria they must not let it reproduce otherwise there will be no stopping them
Although the movie wasn't the best, im glad it kept the og book in mind and mostly faithfully followed it even if the thunderchild scene was kinda goofy lol
I refuse to believe that the humans would still lose having nukes available, it's pretty hard to believe that humans would lose against aliens considering modern technology
In the original war of the worlds, the tripods could be taken out by artillery so modern weapons would wreck them, that said a actual alien invasion could win mostly by just dropping rocks from orbit on all major resistance points.@@wackydude101
Isn’t this just the English version of war of the worlds but more modern but it’s just in London also and yeah basically the only difference is it’s more modern and less vehicle tax because even the old man part is the same
Oh yeah, it’s funny as in the American version of it the man has a shotgun, but in the British version the man has a shank and England is known for their knives in America is known for their guns
You really do see the dilemma for filmakers nowadays making these alien invasion movies.....while even low budget flicks can put out impressive special effects such as this movie...and they are very good hats off to the CGI team on this movie...where you can see the problem is with....people. they just dont have the budget to have lots of people milling around such as would happen in an invasion and the streets seem sterile despite the invasion which just sort of takes away from the movie somehow. still, they did a great job.
Movie recap: War of the Worlds: The Attack (2023)
@@A2kry the 05 is the only best war of the worlds
@Kry Fam the original novel was British, set in the UK
This is basically if the 2005 film was more book accurate lol
@@BreathologyGamingthe musical is my fav
Ayyyyyyy bet bro got his movie good
"The creature in the bushes turns out to be a blood-thirsty monster: British Artillery soldier Ben."
Instant sub
the most dangerous creature is already close to you
if you saw it hen it already heard you.
as a person who watched the movie and hated it, this line made me love this recap
and they were right ben was indeed a monster taking out the tripod like that
High tech jets and missiles are useless , but a grenade takes them out ….
It be like that sometimes
It’s because it goes inside where the aliens operate the machine beyond their shield and kills them.
Droidicas are the same
Tbh I doesn’t make sense
*inside
The soldiers: Yes! We killed it! The world is safe!!!
Other tripods in the distance: *allow us to introduce ourselves*
The movie: 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
@@AdhvaithSane they literally copied the 2005 design just with like 1000 more tentacles so yeah ur right.. kinda
war of woods: shitcunt 2023 2077 version
@@therealsmorespig and what? yeah it might look kinda bad compared to 2005 but its not made by large studio and steven spielberg
This really is a near-exact retelling of the original novel "War of the Worlds", and like with that, Ben informs them that the military has been completely exterminated in mere *days* at most; they could only put up a measily few days combat before they were completely eradicated in the course of the battle. In short, their entire nation's collapsed completely, any government officers who have survived have committed cowardice; those that fulfilled their duty are long-dead, or simply eaten by the Martians; and the ones who resist the aliens will inevitably meet the same fate... they have never had any chance from the start.
Exactly.
@@porg832 Ironically, the Martian administration that planned the invasion did a truly *horrible* job of equipping and training their troops: no medicine for the native diseases for one thing.
I mean, basically all they did was hand the humans some of their hardware- via sending in penal battalions with no hope of survival; just instructions to do damage.
No wonder they're classified properly as psychopaths: and no wonder they lost!
Exactly
@@runa_das That's a most predictable result of an alien outright military invasion, but if resistance can continue, the simulations show that victory becomes certain, and the human society that remains becomes far stronger; so in the end it is a complete disaster for the aliens; as now their ability to remain secret is gone- and humanity, a species with a true natural genius for extermination of any kind of lifeform that gets in our way, now has them in our sights.
exactly
Let us all be honest, The Original is the absolute best but this ain't to bad, Atleast it had them actually be Martians and octopus type, Take place in Britain, And have a Character called Ogilvy, And overall plot is very similar to the book it is just I REALLY do prefer the old Victorian setting and I don't mind a 1913 or 1938 setting, Just you know these old times, Though the fact the black kid (Dont remember his name) can mention the Tim Burton Movie Mars Attacks but not the War of the Worlds is somewhat of a crime
Fictional scenario rule 1: There's no fictional version of the scenario you are in right now
it's a pretty good film, if you don't compare it with Spielberg's version.
I'd compare this to scary movie 4
@@KevinSanchez-om8po fr scary movie 4 is better in the way it shows the inside of the tripods
I’d be inclined to compare it to George Pal’s version…
.
If you don't compare it to any good movie, it is a masterpiece 😂
"We have war of the worlds 2005 at home"
War of the worlds 2005 at home:
**astronomer opens door**
Alien: Tf bro im dressing up
Dude your recaps are hilarious. You have to remind people to like and subscribe cause it’s easy to forget and your videos are great. Thanks for the hard work. I appreciate it
Doctor Zoidberg
Great? They sound like a Chinese operating instruction sheet translated to Spanish, then English🤣
i like the minor humor while keeping the recaps professional lmao
Wait, so these tripods don't have magic force fields yet they still roll over a modern military? How?
plot armor 😂😂😂
Maybe they have more durable armor, because they DID blow one up, but were still overwhelmed
There are 2 explanations of this:
1.Black Hole Physics
2.Magic
Quantum-armour with a quantum-generator with quantum-weapons
Because the writing of the story says so :)
'A distant relative of Cthulhu and Dr Zoidberg'-wonderful-you have a great future ahead of you.
You caught that!! That was awesome! 😆 🤣 😂
No. You are awesome.
Have a nice day
@visitante 2050 only if you have one too
That's when I subscribed 😂
😂😅 Holy shit, that was so funny dude lol
well atleast the 05 version made sence for why the military couldnt fight back. This one appeared to have no shields and were weak enough to be taken down by a hand grenade. why the couldn't the military take them down with ease.
i think they inspired the 2005 when ray was ubducted and the red tentacle took Ray, then Ray pulled the pin when getting ubducted
These ones were more agile and able to shoot down Aircraft’s, unlike the 2005 ones that could only vaporize stuff on the ground
In the book its set in like 1800s or something and sense this is semi faithful its a lil weird i kinda agree but these are also more agile like in the book and could probably gallop/run like in the books too
i’m pretty sure they had no shields in the book.
The tripods from the radio play and original book didn't have shields either - consider that Welles wrote the book between 1895 and 1897, but the first mention of a forcefield or similar device didn't occur until 1931. Instead, the aliens relied on a much more understandable _(for the general public of the day)_ form of protection: Armour. Consider how destructive a 20mm cannon was against a big tank in WWII _(AArghh! Tony's head just turned in to pink mist, there's a fist sized hole where Dave's face should be, and we're on fire!)_ compared to what that same cannon shout would do to a slab of Chobham _(fcuk sake, I've repainted the turret twice this month already, someone else can do it this time)._ The grenade thing is glaringly obvious: go and get two balloons, make sure they're identical, and lay them flat on your desk, uninflated. Pick one up, and destroy it by blowing _in to the inside_ of it, count how many puffs it takes you. Now destroy the other one by blowing _on the outside_ of it, and count how many puffs _that_ takes, and compare the two.
It's good to see that H.G. Wells' classic SF story is still inspiring folk to adapt it. Without seeing the whole thing, I don't know the details, but in the main, this one looks at least half decent. OK, so it doesn't follow the actual story very closely, but then, it has been modernised. The protagonist in Wells' original tale has been replaced by three students, you still have the doctor, the religious man ( a curate in the book) and a military man ( who suffered a deep inferiority complex when he saw what was happening). Yet, the ships, tripods and red weed come from Mars, the Martians are octopus like, and perhaps best of all, having brought at least London, if not the world, to its knees, the Martians die from all the various bacteria, viruses and other pathogens that fill our planet alongside us... with strong hints that, given time, the Martians might be able to adapt to them!
A film doesn't have to be a big budget blockbuster to be good- think 'Monsters'. Don't get me wrong, because I loved Spielberg's adaptation,, but some adaptations work better than others. The latest offering from the BBC had good creatures and special effects, but made some awful errors. Whilst placing it in its period setting (the Victorian era) it tried to 'update' things by turning the protagonist into an unmarried mother, and getting all moralistic on certain topics, which wouldn't have been seen as an issue then. The result was stodgy and mostly unappealing even to die hard SF fans. There was another adaptation that came out just afterward, but whilst I've heard about it, I haven't seen it or heard very much about it, so wonder how well it did.
This adaptation, however, seems to have taken the basic elements of the story and filled the rest in with its own ideas. It looks like it didn't go overboard trying to add anything extra, and though set in a modern day, didn't try to add on modern moral values, at least that I can see. They say less is more, and in this instance, it seems they got it just about right!
This is not an adaption, it's obviously a ripoff from the 2005 movie, as well as "Arrival". How can you call this garbage half decent 😂
@@SirKolass It's in no way a ripoff of the goofy 2005 movie, don't get me wrong 2005 is better in terms of well effects and i guess designs though i didn't find the tripods here that shitty but i believe the reason its half decent as some say is because of how faithful it is to the book which is better then both movies lol.
0:05 Its not a good look when the helpless civilians in your movie look like they're going on a leisurely jog.
seeing how accurate this is to the book it gives me enthusiasm
Have you even read the book? If you want book accurate watch either of the war of the worlds movies made by pendragon studios
@@tomdelvetto9906 I in fact have read the book my dear friend, when i wrote my comment what i referred to was : the elements from the original novel that made it into the film , for example the insane Curate and the way they met him on a boat , in the book the narrator met the Curate on a boat after the attack on Weybridge by the Martians , the Artilleryman who the main characters offered food and drink when they first met him in the same manner the narrator did the same thing in his house in Maybury Hill , also the fact that some of the names for the main characters are also from the book , for example Ogilvy , the main character's name is a reference to the Author H.G. Wells , i could go on and on with the elements that i recognised from the novel that did in fact make it in the film but we would be here all day , i can also inform you that i have read the authorised Sequel to the novel , "The Massacre Of Mankind" wich is from Mrs. Elphinstone's point of view as she recollects her own eyewtiness account of the brutal Martian Blitzkrieg that she and many around the globe witnessed , both books were a good read and very enjoyable.
"it appears to be a blood thirsty monster, british artillery soldier ben." mf got me laughin' 😂
ah yes I remember when the British army had T-90A tanks in its military 4:33
Didn't Orson Wells scare the daylights out of everyone with the "War of The Worlds" radio broadcast on Halloween once?😊
1937
That was just an urban legend. The broadcast didn't actually have a whole lot of listeners at the time. The idea that there was a mass panic from the radio broadcast was just a faux article that newspapers wrote to sell more papers.
@@rosaamarillo2110
Actually, October 31st 1938...
This was so cinematic and well made, I just wish the VFX/CGI was more realistic. Ngl it kinda looks like something I could do if I had the time lololol
When you look at it, this is actually the most accurate representation of War of the Worlds set in modern day London.
"Offended by the small caliber" I almost spit out lauging. Great one.
Nice little easter eggs there; Ogilvy, Herbert, using the actual Horshall Common, the mental pastor, the Artilleryman etc etc. But yet ANOTHER War of the Worlds ignoring the most BADASS scene in the book: HMS Thunderchild taking down three Tripods
actually 5
After all that time, i still ask myself, why have they never tried to make the Machines stumble?! they got 3 Legs, and are definitely not capable of walking on 2 Legs alone...
And why have they never considered Mines, if they can blow them up from "inside their Shields"?
Yeah; in the British teleseries "The Tripods" they brought down a tripod just by sabotaging one of its legs and making it fall down. Anything that walks can be brought down with any number of traps. But that ignores the basic plot device of Martians on tripods, like Wells envisioned. The 1954 "War of the Worlds" probably answered these issues best, and that's why it's so endearing. The Martian war machines float above the ground on electromagnetic "legs" that can't be broken, they have shields to prevent conventional attacks, and they have heat rays and skeleton beams that can't be defended against.
Grab a bunch of snowspeeders
4:45 the tanks shown are literally T-72s 💀
T-90s but yeah I know right, so shit lmao
I think they are T90As
“Straddled on their precious pedal machines, the astronomers head into town.”
What? 🤣
Aliens caught covid, too. 😂
😆 🤣 😂
Yooo another tripod les gooooo. Reminds me of the tripod from 2005
(These goobers traumatize me but i love them still)
"Sir, these walking giant squid-looking machines are vulnerable to our weapons."
"Well that's not fair to the story... quick! Charge right at them instead of using range to our advantage!!!"
Your narration is TOP NOTCH!!
No. You are top notch.
Have a nice day
@@visitante-pc5zc profound
A story how Nurgle saved Earth from an alien invasion
Papa nurgle always here to save -corrupt- the day
@@CB-rq1vo all hail papa Nurgle
The way the alien vaporize the victims look more scary than the 2005 movie
when the hell did War Of the Worlds get a sequel.
I wouldn't call this a sequel as both movies are retellings of HG Wells' original book from the like 1899. This one, with the exception of time setting, and again no HMS Thuderchild (😢), is a more accurate retelling of the book.
@@airplanenut89 This junk is basically a ripoff from the 2005 movie with added book elements.
Military Alliance vs The Imperial Alien Empire Forces
Cool comment
Ok...I love all the comedy ad-libs you do while summarizing the movie lol
"Mom their back again -_-" Mom: "WDYM THEIR BACK????
I am glad that the Crazy Priest got what came for him: Death.
Tbh after the 2005 war of the worlds every future adaptation of war of the worlds was based around the 2005 version and not really the original novel (except 1 movie but that one is hard to even find and has barely been archived)
Bro really called it DR. Zoidberg
"He finds a whole bunch of nothing in the woods" 😂
Precious pedal machines. Heh. That's one way to call a bicycle.
Man this was too funny I loved this! Thank you!
Nobody: ChatGPT, rephrase "Riding their bikes" but make it 100x more pretentious
Narrator: "Saddled on their precious pedal machines"
Mum can we have war of the worlds?
No we have war of the worlds at home.
War of the worlds at home:
“Pedel machine” (bike)
that one tripod that got shot by the artillery man and blown up:HEY MAN IM OFFENDED NOW.
I'd like to see a movie version of The Great Martian War, 1913-1917.
"Martian" Im Just Trying To Correct Your Comment
@@JeffWayneTWOTWFan1322 Thanks, fixed it.
@@JeffWayneTWOTWFan1322brother..?
@@jeffwaynetripod169Don’t u understand that he said that he fixed the comment?
@@Russain1 I'm meaning that he's my "Brother" idiot.
2:30 I find it really weird how the visual effects are extremely amateur in one shot but then incredibly well done in the next
POV: when the deadlines were so bad you had to split works between different contractors ;)
Films always misunderstood the whole military aspect of the tripods - the heat ray was impressive but it didnt match with the raw strength of the human forces - sheer numbers and being able to defend dug in positions. The martians are actually brought to a halt in the book and the only reason they break through human lines is due to their use of black gas - something that the humans have no defence against. After that its just a matter of tidying up.
So we either get tripods that are somehow magically immune to everything, or humans who are completely incompetent and only seem to turn up with a handful of their actual forces. Its such a shame as the story is so much better when told as it is, as that both respects the human military and is all the more crushing when what could have been an actual victory for them is surprisingly flipped by martian adaptation.
Me: chilling
Alien ships: lands and starts to invade
Me: we come in peace welcome to our planet
POV: the 2005 tripods didn’t do good enough so they sent in a downgrade to kill them-aka 2005 tripods looked cooler
you can't really have an invasion from mars set in the 21st century, pretending that we don't know what's on mars and haven't landed multiple missions on it.
Well, more Mars probes, orbiters and landers have mysteriously failed than on all the other planets put together. More than a 50% mission failure rate on Mars and no decent explanation as to why...... I agree it's implausible, but I still wouldn't say the possibility exists 🤔
yeah how smart of you bikes = pedal machines
*I couldn't help but notice that the guns and missiles did nothing to the horrifying tripod while the most simple bacteria killed it*
the ending in which theres an egg that survived. means that one of the eggs had a mutation in the genes, which means they can repel the bacteria they must not let it reproduce otherwise there will be no stopping them
Although the movie wasn't the best, im glad it kept the og book in mind and mostly faithfully followed it
even if the thunderchild scene was kinda goofy lol
1:56 how they just stand there, like they see this everyday LOL
Fun fact: If birds are surrounding a tripod, it means the immune system is weak and it can be taken down by heavy artillery
THX FOR THE RECAP! i needed spoilers
"He finds a whole bunch of nothing in the woods" :)))
War of the world Walmart version
However with the exception of no HMS Thunderchild is a more accurate retelling of the original 1898 book.
Tesco value
But The Film Studios Turned It Down Saying That It Would Still Be Far Too Expensive To Even Contemplate Trying To Make.
I refuse to believe that the humans would still lose having nukes available, it's pretty hard to believe that humans would lose against aliens considering modern technology
In the 1953 movie they drop an atomic bomb on them, a group of machines cluster together to increase thier shields power to withstand the blast.
In the original war of the worlds, the tripods could be taken out by artillery so modern weapons would wreck them, that said a actual alien invasion could win mostly by just dropping rocks from orbit on all major resistance points.@@wackydude101
You have my Subscribe and thumb-up for very colorful additions in recap.
that was a quick defeat
Still cannot beat, 2005.
I prefer the 2005 version gotta love that matrix sentinel tripod
“Show”, don’t “tell”.
If not, “tell” without pretension - such creative license rarely serves any true utility.
4:34 Martian tripod business XD
Fun fact: your actually talking about the Rip off war of the worlds 2005
Bro what are you talking about the 2005 one is a good movie but isn’t accurate to the books at all, though this one is pretty accurate
@@MrSecretTickleTime but is still a rip off
How is it a ripoff? 2005 isn’t even the original you absolute scallywag
Are you guys fucking dumb? This one is the fucking 2023 one it came out a few months ago not a year ago.
Isn’t this just the English version of war of the worlds but more modern but it’s just in London also and yeah basically the only difference is it’s more modern and less vehicle tax because even the old man part is the same
Oh yeah, it’s funny as in the American version of it the man has a shotgun, but in the British version the man has a shank and England is known for their knives in America is known for their guns
i love the sarcasm
Respect dropping Morlocks near Mk 8:00 Nice One
Dr Zoidberg !!😂😂
Didn't know feces makes a durable building material.
You should see mine after I shit bricks...😉
“Cathulu and Dr. Zoidberg”
Yeah. Nothing beats 2005
4:30 martian tripod business🤣🤣
wait what this is not the war of worlds I remember 😭 I'm getting to old
Yeah cuz it's a different film mate😊
The First Great Martian war : **minecraft cave sound**
You should be the most famous RUclipsr
Looks like a Big Fin Squid!
Every aliens sci-fi movies: An strange object came from galaxy came down to earth
I really like War of the worlds
2:41 Pedal machines 💀 ? I feel like the entire script is generated by ai. Why not just call the bikes?
Is this on amazon prime or Netflix please let me know
Suppose that aliens do not need war to occupy us.
Life...finds a way.
All it takes is one individual to evolve immunity...
This is like war of the worlds part 2
How many times is this movie going to be made?
You really do see the dilemma for filmakers nowadays making these alien invasion movies.....while even low budget flicks can put out impressive special effects such as this movie...and they are very good hats off to the CGI team on this movie...where you can see the problem is with....people. they just dont have the budget to have lots of people milling around such as would happen in an invasion and the streets seem sterile despite the invasion which just sort of takes away from the movie somehow. still, they did a great job.
😊taht big robot lock like a tribot
the endless drone of a nonstop voice during the entire video had me quit after a couple of minutes
"Offended by the small caliber" 💀
Handsome alien tripod
Twigs, sticks, feces...?What you having for breakfast,dide ?
Wow war of the world's came back
Another example for the ,,How Aliens see the earth"-meme
do one on the 2005 wotw