Ya they will, atleast for the time being. The pirate vs griefer debate is the single largest problem tearing the community apart. With the release of pyro incoming, and terra so far away, they need to cater to the pve community. As much as we don't like to say it, the pvp is and will always be a minority, and not just a small minority, an actual miniscule one. I'd wager no more then ten percent of the player base. And until they can refine the law system to where non consensual pvp only happens to a pve player only a few times per year, then it's going to be a massive black mark against cig in the eyes of the paying community.
They will in some areas, but not in others. This is what they said at CitCon last month: High security planets will have full protection with impervious bases, but high taxes and fees, and low profitability from the land. Low security locations will have partial protection, but lower taxes and fees, and a bit more profitability from land. So with an overwhelming force you could still raid a base there, but you'll have to deal with local NPC security forces, and/or the UEE navy. Then in systems with no security, such as Pyro, there'll be no protection at all (except what you build yourself), but also no taxes or fees, and the land will be HIGHLY profitable. This is what all the big orgs will be fighting over. Really, this setup gives us the best of both worlds. Orgs that want to wage epic wars fighting over highly profitable land and resources will have plenty of space to do so, while people like me, who just want a small shack on Microtech to watch the sunset from at the end of the day, will have our space too.
@purpleyeti705 AA turrets should be easy to repair and manage to avoid bombs if cautious. Also when building comes they need to implement rep and DSM to make the in-game currency matter. (Those bombs are expensive) Different areas should offer options wether to play pvp or pve, without getting rid of the risk entirely. It might be risky for a pve player to traverse in the pu but as we train forward, unlawful players will have to locate into certain ”pvp consensual” places in order to stay alive or out of prison. So risk would be even bigger for them and the bigger question wether if bombing runs in means of griefing is common, in my opinion, rather becomes that: why be a criminal? Why go out of your way to get into trouble? Being involved in a gang should be more lucrative than lawful bounty hunting etc. while cargo hauling should make far more money than either of those. Although.. I could see that in the future, criminals are heavily under financed to do any griefing or bombing runs unless they group up. And the cargohaulers would do occasional griefing visits to criminal systems.
There is so much of the game not in the game yet. Not only will players have reputation but orgs will have reputation as well. If you have org members carpet bombing territory that you want to allie with, that would be political suicide over time. You can not only be banned based on personal reputation but also based on orgs you affiliate with.
Imagine clearing the enemies in the air with fighters. Once clear you bring in this squadron of bombers to clear the enemy ground vehicles and foot soldiers to make way for your drop ships to bring in your ground crew to storm the base for remaining enemies. Would make a cool loop of fighting an enemy org. But first we need those actual reasons in game to do this.
It wouldn't even have to be against an enemy org. They could also have higher-level missions against AI factions where for example you'd need to take and hold an entire base or settlement. A mission that you'd need a dedicated group for to be able to complete, kinda like raids in other MMOs.
@@vainmoth5570 oh hell yeah, I've been blown ass over tea kettle in my Spartan APC at over a kilometer away from an A-2 MOAB impact, and my buddy was only a hundred meters closer and his tank got blown up by the blast. Also if you watch the second bombing run, one of the bombers got caught by the blast of a bomb and was turned into confetti
You have to enable "Headtracking in FPS" inside the VOIP headtracking option inside the SC options menu. ruclips.net/video/T52Fone4EY0/видео.htmlsi=5DXr4BwJcbWZNFiM
In options on the "comms, fiop & head tracking" tab, look for "Head tracking - General - External View Toggle Enabled" and set it to yes. Then in keybindings, select advanced, go down to "VOIP, FOIP and Head Tracking" and set a keybind for "enable/Disable Head Tracking for 3rd Person Camera (toggle). Once that's done, toggle it on and you're all set.
in the night it looks like a Battlefield just missing some lasers and all flying around... man you cou make such a cool Battle scene in Star Citizen...
@@SpaceDad42 Haha, yeah, or Biden or any of the other politicians and liars that maintain the Empire (of the US). And they bought YOU off with some jalapeno poppers, that is the funniest part. Can't even get reasonable healthcare in the imperial core... total suckers
@@xenno8496 because he was referring to nothing to bomb, empty world. It has a lot more locations than most people know about, and way more to come with sq42 being feature complete.
@@zyloctal You can read minds telepathically? Cause I assume he asked what are they bombing because that's pecisely what he wants to know. I want to know that too. Was this some beef between 2 orgs or just training?
Nah, considering the 3 tiers to security, it'll still be very much a thing. Since the highest tier security they literally said your place is pretty much impervious. Then the 2nd heighest your base will have security provided by the local area like UEE but with a strong enough force they can still destroy your place. Then there's the lowest tier in which you will have to provide your own security. They said all of this, i didnt go into detail but pretty much what they said. I could see it being hard to maintain an area in low security but that'll probably be filled with orgs since they can protect their claims. Oh and the lower the security level the cheaper it is apparently, meaning more profits from low/no security zones?
You do realize that if you go to an uninhabitted planet and make a hideout there, the chance that someone will _find you_ will be as low as winning lotto?
There's no way CIG will allow a player building to be impervious to damage. Org territory combat is going to be insane.
Ya they will, atleast for the time being. The pirate vs griefer debate is the single largest problem tearing the community apart. With the release of pyro incoming, and terra so far away, they need to cater to the pve community. As much as we don't like to say it, the pvp is and will always be a minority, and not just a small minority, an actual miniscule one. I'd wager no more then ten percent of the player base. And until they can refine the law system to where non consensual pvp only happens to a pve player only a few times per year, then it's going to be a massive black mark against cig in the eyes of the paying community.
They will in some areas, but not in others. This is what they said at CitCon last month:
High security planets will have full protection with impervious bases, but high taxes and fees, and low profitability from the land.
Low security locations will have partial protection, but lower taxes and fees, and a bit more profitability from land. So with an overwhelming force you could still raid a base there, but you'll have to deal with local NPC security forces, and/or the UEE navy.
Then in systems with no security, such as Pyro, there'll be no protection at all (except what you build yourself), but also no taxes or fees, and the land will be HIGHLY profitable. This is what all the big orgs will be fighting over.
Really, this setup gives us the best of both worlds. Orgs that want to wage epic wars fighting over highly profitable land and resources will have plenty of space to do so, while people like me, who just want a small shack on Microtech to watch the sunset from at the end of the day, will have our space too.
@purpleyeti705 AA turrets should be easy to repair and manage to avoid bombs if cautious. Also when building comes they need to implement rep and DSM to make the in-game currency matter. (Those bombs are expensive) Different areas should offer options wether to play pvp or pve, without getting rid of the risk entirely. It might be risky for a pve player to traverse in the pu but as we train forward, unlawful players will have to locate into certain ”pvp consensual” places in order to stay alive or out of prison. So risk would be even bigger for them and the bigger question wether if bombing runs in means of griefing is common, in my opinion, rather becomes that: why be a criminal? Why go out of your way to get into trouble? Being involved in a gang should be more lucrative than lawful bounty hunting etc. while cargo hauling should make far more money than either of those. Although.. I could see that in the future, criminals are heavily under financed to do any griefing or bombing runs unless they group up. And the cargohaulers would do occasional griefing visits to criminal systems.
@@TheRealBillix yep, that's exactly what i said.
There is so much of the game not in the game yet. Not only will players have reputation but orgs will have reputation as well. If you have org members carpet bombing territory that you want to allie with, that would be political suicide over time. You can not only be banned based on personal reputation but also based on orgs you affiliate with.
Imagine clearing the enemies in the air with fighters. Once clear you bring in this squadron of bombers to clear the enemy ground vehicles and foot soldiers to make way for your drop ships to bring in your ground crew to storm the base for remaining enemies. Would make a cool loop of fighting an enemy org. But first we need those actual reasons in game to do this.
First we would need 1000 player servers for such to actually be worth it and immersive
It wouldn't even have to be against an enemy org. They could also have higher-level missions against AI factions where for example you'd need to take and hold an entire base or settlement. A mission that you'd need a dedicated group for to be able to complete, kinda like raids in other MMOs.
this is something i've wanted to do for so long. it looks phenomenal
A2 has been in game for a while now literally the scourge of jumptown
1:51 shockwave is visible, insane details
can she cause any damage to a nearby player/ship?
@@vainmoth5570 oh hell yeah, I've been blown ass over tea kettle in my Spartan APC at over a kilometer away from an A-2 MOAB impact, and my buddy was only a hundred meters closer and his tank got blown up by the blast. Also if you watch the second bombing run, one of the bombers got caught by the blast of a bomb and was turned into confetti
the good ol jt clearers
Look badass asf, also how do u use ur head tracking in 3rd person? i have a tobii and cant find that setting
You have to enable "Headtracking in FPS" inside the VOIP headtracking option inside the SC options menu. ruclips.net/video/T52Fone4EY0/видео.htmlsi=5DXr4BwJcbWZNFiM
In options on the "comms, fiop & head tracking" tab, look for "Head tracking - General - External View Toggle Enabled" and set it to yes. Then in keybindings, select advanced, go down to "VOIP, FOIP and Head Tracking" and set a keybind for "enable/Disable Head Tracking for 3rd Person Camera (toggle). Once that's done, toggle it on and you're all set.
💯@@ODataOmachineO
@@ODataOmachineO awesome, thanks!
in the night it looks like a Battlefield just missing some lasers and all flying around...
man you cou make such a cool Battle scene in Star Citizen...
have you watched star citizen war for jumptown?
@@aronhayse9895 yeah i did and my Orga also had more than one battle there
war war never changes
How can the bombs look so good, but the bombing interface look so bad
but there weren't any civilians there like henry kissinger would have wanted
their practicing wiping drug runners off jumptown
Or biden.
@@SpaceDad42 Haha, yeah, or Biden or any of the other politicians and liars that maintain the Empire (of the US). And they bought YOU off with some jalapeno poppers, that is the funniest part. Can't even get reasonable healthcare in the imperial core... total suckers
6:07 love this scene
If i mid-sized battle ever goes down in this game it will brick all PCs involved.
if this is what passes as carpet bombing in a space game. I'll stick with grandpa buff
What's the max altitude for bombing in game?
Atmosphere . depends on the size of the planet
Absolutely bad ass!
Пусть авторы учат физику - звук так не распространяется
I'm missing a special kind of song... It goes like this :
"America - Fuck yeah!
Coming again to save the mother fucking day yeah"
All that is missng is actually destroyed terrain, like in No Man's Sky
Amazing😮
you should fly slower and maybe have a target like a bunker and then add a cool rock music like free bird.
🤔
lol but what are you bombing???
Campaign is done, now 80 percent of the staff is going to start putting all the content they have in, putting server meshing at priority one.
@@zyloctal????? What does SQ 42's current status have to do with him asking what they're bombing!?
@@xenno8496 because he was referring to nothing to bomb, empty world. It has a lot more locations than most people know about, and way more to come with sq42 being feature complete.
@@zyloctal You can read minds telepathically?
Cause I assume he asked what are they bombing because that's pecisely what he wants to know. I want to know that too. Was this some beef between 2 orgs or just training?
@@delayed_control could have been some of the 40 above ground outposts.
and THATS why I knew planetary player housing would be a spectacular waste of time =) It will be a dead asset/feature in game.
tbf we don't have AI blades yet, nor player owned turrets. Nor will turrets shoot down bombs.
Nah, considering the 3 tiers to security, it'll still be very much a thing. Since the highest tier security they literally said your place is pretty much impervious. Then the 2nd heighest your base will have security provided by the local area like UEE but with a strong enough force they can still destroy your place. Then there's the lowest tier in which you will have to provide your own security. They said all of this, i didnt go into detail but pretty much what they said. I could see it being hard to maintain an area in low security but that'll probably be filled with orgs since they can protect their claims. Oh and the lower the security level the cheaper it is apparently, meaning more profits from low/no security zones?
Just shows how little you actually know
They will prob have an eve style system like pos shield and timers, many games do it this way.
You do realize that if you go to an uninhabitted planet and make a hideout there, the chance that someone will _find you_ will be as low as winning lotto?