Hey, thanks for the review ! How do you compare it with an Ezone 98, eventually the new 2025 version ? I've used an Ezone100 but that had to much power and less control so I switched to Percept 97 with some custom, great control but less power. Now I'm looking for a racket with similar control like Percept 97 but a little more power. I'm looking at Technifiber 305s and the new 2025 Ezone 98. Thanks for any feedback !
I tried Ice Code couple years ago. It's a good string for full swings, with great control. But it seems truly little bit "cold" in terms of free power. Like the name suggest - ice code. It needs a break in period to get the strings moving. It's too muted in my opinion at the beginning. But overall a good pick for hard hitters and string breakers. The Razor Soft makes more sense to me now with it's easier playability right from the start.
The RS version was a better quality racket than the iso . It performed best with razor code . The strings are the key to this line of rackets . When a company is relying on the strings to do most of the work , it regulates the racket as a mear utility which can be discardable , effectively removing sales . This will force companies to more design their strings to specialize for the racket . They will do this rather than admit that they have given up on high performance rackets . It is as if you took a mass market Honda car and sprucing it up a bit cosmeticly and calling it an nsx super car but really it's the change of the motor and suspension doing the work . T fight pro rackets have an accesable trap door .
I am in with this oppinion Derek. The RS was amazing, the build quality and feel of the frame was super solid. Felt little bit underpowered, like a pro stock racket. And the SW 340? Crazy, unplayable. Starting with the ISO the frame feels a lot "airy", hollow, light let's say. I am also at this moment focusing more on the strings, because they are absolutely crucial for the overall good experience. And with the trap door I didn't see a single Tecnifibre racket having it. But if the pro stocks have it, it's good.
@CzechTennisGuy sorry for the typos , the keyword letters and auto correct screw up certain words , also the comment section will not let me edit and send. The 1st paragraph is strings that are very important . I believe there are a few more typos but I can not get to them while typing on my phone .
díky sa skvele video.
T Fight 315S next lets go! =)
I will probably not have this version for a review. At least not for now.
Hey, thanks for the review ! How do you compare it with an Ezone 98, eventually the new 2025 version ? I've used an Ezone100 but that had to much power and less control so I switched to Percept 97 with some custom, great control but less power. Now I'm looking for a racket with similar control like Percept 97 but a little more power. I'm looking at Technifiber 305s and the new 2025 Ezone 98. Thanks for any feedback !
ruclips.net/video/K3B8Yw2skbE/видео.html
I got the Tfight 300. If you have tried ice code do you still prefer razor soft?
I tried Ice Code couple years ago. It's a good string for full swings, with great control. But it seems truly little bit "cold" in terms of free power. Like the name suggest - ice code. It needs a break in period to get the strings moving. It's too muted in my opinion at the beginning. But overall a good pick for hard hitters and string breakers. The Razor Soft makes more sense to me now with it's easier playability right from the start.
The RS version was a better quality racket than the iso . It performed best with razor code . The strings are the key to this line of rackets . When a company is relying on the strings to do most of the work , it regulates the racket as a mear utility which can be discardable , effectively removing sales . This will force companies to more design their strings to specialize for the racket .
They will do this rather than admit that they have given up on high performance rackets . It is as if you took a mass market Honda car and sprucing it up a bit cosmeticly and calling it an nsx super car but really it's the change of the motor and suspension doing the work . T fight pro rackets have an accesable trap door .
I am in with this oppinion Derek. The RS was amazing, the build quality and feel of the frame was super solid. Felt little bit underpowered, like a pro stock racket. And the SW 340? Crazy, unplayable. Starting with the ISO the frame feels a lot "airy", hollow, light let's say.
I am also at this moment focusing more on the strings, because they are absolutely crucial for the overall good experience. And with the trap door I didn't see a single Tecnifibre racket having it. But if the pro stocks have it, it's good.
@CzechTennisGuy sorry for the typos , the keyword letters and auto correct screw up certain words , also the comment section will not let me edit and send. The 1st paragraph is strings that are very important . I believe there are a few more typos but I can not get to them while typing on my phone .
This design is much better.
It's still all white with french drip all over... ?!?
How would you rank these please :
Tfight305s
Blade 98
Babolat 98 2025
Prestige tour
Aero 98
ruclips.net/video/K3B8Yw2skbE/видео.html