How Climate Made History, Pt. 2 - Conquerers, The Dark Ages, and Climate Change - Full Documentary
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 май 2024
- Is it possible that climate change could have kick-started the end of Antiquity? When temperatures drop and the climate becomes drier, the Huns swarm Europe. It’s the last straw and brings about a mass migration that shakes the foundations of the Roman Empire. But could this have been enough to herald the beginning of the Dark Ages?
--
Welcome to the official Get.factual youtube channel! 🌍
We are a documentary streaming channel covering history, science, technology, and nature. Explore worlds distant, forgotten, and unknown; from the depths of ocean trenches to the far reaches of the cosmos.
New uploads of full-length documentaries and docu-series every week!
Subscribe here: bit.ly/GetfactualSUB 
Развлечения
The ice age never ended. We are just in a mild interglacial period. It's been much hotter than now in the past.
I think it's us that is worried and we can't control anything including ourselves . The world will continue quite well without us it has done this many times .
🎯👍👏!
As concerns life in this planet we are of course perfectly insignificant
You know much Jon Snow
I watched the two episodes, I liked them but to end with "we are going to control the climate" is just stupid unless humans can also control all the other factors, not using oil will not stop disasters, it may help to avoid some but eventually disaster will come
serious delusion... like they did not watch their own video
22.20 decades of aluminium 'chaff' for planes to avoid radar detection or mono atomic aluminium used for geoengineering/cloud seeding?
In the MSM disasters happen every day. They ARE the disaster.
Just give the elite more power and money and they will solve it 😂
I thought it was weak, cobbled together and mostly unsubstantiated nonsense. Should have been called 'How changes in climate played a possibly minor role in shaping history'
Two part series about orbits, the sun, rotational axes, volcanoes, world wide floods and at the end, in the last two minutes, some jackwagon makes a completely incongruous (and delusional according to the previous 100+ minutes) proclamation that somehow we are now in control.
I completely agree.
If you listen closely the gentleman was referring only to human-induced global warming in the current era, not climate-change over centuries and millennia which seems to have been caused mostly by volcanos and sunshine. He's dead right too. If we don't get on top of global heating, it's closing time in the Gardens of the West. Cheers. 🧐
@@tonytaskforce3465 Yes, we are regularly told the end is near, thanks for your contribution.
Of course we are in control now. Haven't you seen 'The Day the Earth Stood Still'?
Included in the time covered two episodes many rapid changes in Climate through unknown causes, as well as those attributed to various causes.
But fear of being cancelled by the vocal green lobby means like any other work on climate manmade climate change HAS to be the cause of a little but very welcome warming. This just after the coldest part of the last 9k years in a cold interglacial, colder than the previous 3
Our ability to control volcano s and the sun must have really advanced.
Yeah we got the hang of it
we still can't control either ! we do know more about both but are still learning.
Due to Alien technologies we can have clean flying saucers...
Ask the Australians about how well we controlled the mess that Tonga eruption caused. Luckily, there are very few eruptions as big as that BANG... the last one was Krakatoa. Unfortunately, that was big enough to pump water into the troposphere, teaching the scientists something they didn't know before: it's usually dry up that high, and it totally screwed up the southern polar vortex. They could track it with weather satellites in realtime. And to their surprise that disrupted weather patterns enough to cause the worst flooding in Australia EVER ... which is hard to fathom, because I've seen Queensland get whacked with some pretty major flooding over the past 5 decades.
What an idiotic conclusion. We are dumping as much co2 into the atmosphere as was done during the Permian and we all know what happened then, The Great Dying!
Well, we have some choices, but not with volcanoes or solar flares. Very well done...
Earthquakes are inevitable when you live on a subduction zones. When you live on the coast you may have to run to higher grounds for the tsunamis. When you live in or near mountains you may be surprised by flash flooding, etcetera.
We are simple pawns in the game on the Earth. Little to no control do we have. We are all simple blips in the tales during the times of existence. Live, love, procreate and pass into the next level of existence. The Earth will long forget about us in the distant eons of time from now.
Correct you are, Master Yoda.
A lesson worth remembering for the europeans of the 21st century
Thanks camera man for your effort.
"Create a stable climate for all future generations" is that sarcasm? Install a thermostat?
Huge thermostats. And put a plug on volcanos.
It's propaganda dear, the all documentary is historical and scientifc disinformation, it makes absurd and inacurate statements and pure unbacked claims.
We cannot control climate. We cannot control nature. We cannot control the earth's axis, its orbit, or its rotation. What a silly note to end this on.
Agreed. Sounds like wishful thinking.
Sounds like wishful thinking.
Once again, excellent documentary! Keep them coming :)
All you need is one massive or several volcanic eruptions in a short period and volcanic winter can occur…that would stop all solar generation of power and wind turbines could also fail…crops could be severely affected. Only nuclear power is resistant to such catastrophes.
This is common sense!
Best documentary I watch for while
It's full of historical inacuracies and absurdities... I rarealy saw something so bad . Barbaric invasions were not due to "climate change" it was mostly just looting and destruction, no population displacement happened, no "climate refugees", european populations remained stable for the las three thousand years, no mass migrations to be noted, this is proven by precise genetic data. Rome did'nt fall because of "climate change" but because it could'nt secure such long borders, lacked soldiers and politicaly degenerated drom the inside, the administration collapsed. They affirm stuff without backing them by scientific evidence. One malnurished boy, who could have been a slave or an orphan, becomes the poster boy for general "climate change" that did'nt happen in this period of time. The tilt of the earth shift suddently seems to happen every three hundred years. You should seriously get more cautious, this doc is plain scientific and historical misinformation. I'm quite angry , what's the point?
I know. It was really interesting until the U.N.'s enviro-propaganda porn at the end ruined it.
This two-part production has been very interesting and provides notable insights on a variety of subjects. The most notable of these points in my opinion is learning how 'climate change' is expressly defined as fluctuations in both orbital cycles and solar radiation levels.
As we enter a period where carbon taxation increasingly claims to be necessary in order to tackle climate change, what are we supposed to believe? It appears that ALL the Government's around the world are collectively uniting to fraudulently rip-off their own citizens.
Definitely.
okay there's a couple of things I want to comment on about your post.
Firstly you forgot about volcanic eruptions.
Secondly you seem to willingly ignore the conclusion presented at the end of the documentary, are you cherry picking the parts you like about the video or are you simply blinded by confirmation bias?
Thirdly the various governments aren't uniting about anything, their purpose for existing is to rip-off their citizens and protect their own authority, that has been the case since the dawn of civilization. This isn't some new concept that appeared in out lifetime.
So this is why I think you didn't mention volcanic eruption, because "dust in the stratosphere reflecting or blocking the suns heat" sounds awfully similar to "CO2, Methane and other gasses in the atmosphere reflect escaping heat back down onto the planet"
If you can believe a volcano can do it then you know humanity can do it too, volcanoes are awesome in their power and humanity with our 8billion population and vast infrastructure and industry we most certainly are comparative to a volcanic eruption don't you think?
Americans could have voted for Al Gore instead of George Bush and then we would have cleaner air and the two towers would still be standing.
Probably wouldn't have to take our shoes off to get on an airplane either.
Any way have a nice day.
@@Kalleosini you need to salt the fries and get back to the drive thru window. stop dabbling in climate activism
@@holoholohaolenokaoi2299 cope
@@Kalleosini thank you for taking the time to share your views my friend. I'm guessing by your response that I may not have made myself as clear as I'd hoped. I am in agreement that volcanic activity, the accumulation of greenhouse gases, including methane released from thawing permafrost and the burning of fossil fuels are all contributing factors and it's therefore ridiculous to consider singling out one of these factors as a means to improving the situation. Increasing our taxation for the fuels necessary to power the products that they got rich developing, is perverse.
Watching this series and understanding that human activities are governed by climate change all the while having the UN climate change statement saying it is mainly human caused is priceless.
Once i heard that paintings from Europe on 19th centuries always come with gloomy orange skyview bcs of Tambora eruptions and Les Grand Armees of Napoleonic France were devastated bcs of this erruption. So butterfly effect is real, just imagine how long distance Tambora to Europe. Anyway, i'm from Indonesia hehehe
I've watched documentaries and read reports on exactly the instance ur speaking of...
Tambora and Krakatoa both erupted almost in succession by geological standards, 1815 for Tambora, and 1883 for Krakatoa.
The armies of Napoleon were not really affected by the Tambora eruption and its aftermath. The volcano erupted in April 1815. By that time Napoleon Grand Armee had already been beaten. That happened three years earlier in Russia. But maybe the rainy weather of June 18, 1815 contributed to Napoleon's final defeat at Waterloo. In any case, the real impact of the eruption, the year without summer, is in 1816. At that time Napoleon was already in exile at St. Helen where he died in 1821.
@@elfrad1714 Nice story.
Very superficial video, and partly even untrue. After the battle of the Teutoburg Forest just some few years later Roman legions entered again that part of Germania to take revenge - successfully.
Correction: "The planet" doesn't "struggle to cope", it doesn't care about changes in the climate, that is purely a human concern, though it affects all life. Crocodile infested swamps in the Artic are just as valid and 'desirable" to 'it' as a Snowball Earth.
the planet is used here as in reference to the then current ecosystems. tiny d
It is also people who don't care. Where i live in Wyoming people let their cars run almost continually. Doesn't matter what the weather is like they just don't shut them off. I guess that is too much effort for people here.
@@Mike-zf4xg 5ish 659 O 7 Y A racoooivo o ojc p0pzuzcxgt
Right: just an anthropomorphism.
@@drmarikabouchon7361 I don't think one can Anthropomorphize A planet
".. made the Roman legions invincible" (4.38) - the only problem, nobody told that to Arminius. The term "invincible", in a documentary, is inappropriate.
well . . . they never got round to inventing trousers so they weren't all that!
Excellent video 😊
Explain how climate caused the two world wars of the 20th century?
I enjoyed this very simplified version of climatic events that assisted in the rise and fall of our species in terms of development and degradation. When describing these events it must be realized that the conclusions of these narrations are only partially correct. We can and have influenced the climate but we cannot control it as proposed by your narrator at the end. The related causative influences of volcanic activity and solar activity are definitely scientifically proven but the deaths of millions upon millions of people, plants, and animals are perhaps most significantly attributed to the seeming inability of our species to act responsibly and with a duty of care for our planet and environmental wellbeing.
I am all for taking care of the planet and the environment. But climate change is not anthropogenic. The people who think it is and that we can control it are the climate deniers. Yesss CO² is a greenhouse gas. But its effects are nowhere near what climate models predict. CO² makes up 0.00041% of the atmosphere and of that we have contributed 0.00013% since the dawn of the industrial revolution. The Earth is greener now than in recorded history. Plants love it AND I'll definitely pass on trying to force in the next glacial period!
I have not flown since before I retired from the US Navy in the 80's. Since Sept 1990 I have owned two motor vehicles. They were/are high mpg motor vehicles. I had the first for 20 years and have exceeded 12 years 3 months on my present vehicle. Over the last 32 years I have averaged less than 6,000 miles per year on my motor vehicles. I also live on what many would term a "meager" lifestyle and I think I put more than 6,000 miles per year on my bicycle (never measured it). The rich, including the Climate Change screamers, love their person jets. Each trip they take exceeds a year's worth of my personal carbon footprint. When they take it seriously, we will see them selling all their jets and homes on the coasts. Then I will take it seriously. I believe a 7 billion strong mankind has some influence with climate change on a small scale, but I refuse to take personal responsibility for that influence. (Apparently so does Al Gore and his ilk.) We will likely continue to influence climate change, but I doubt if we will control it in the near future if not much, much longer.
@@justincosby2258 I really enjoy my Diesel .
I too have "gone green" increasingly over the years but not so much to save the planet but to save myself money in the long term.@@edmartin875
I still have a jar of Mt saint Helens ash from around 1980 It's light grey and very powdery.
I guess now that we can decide what type of climate to live in, does that also mean that we can decide when and where volcanic eruptions take place or can we decide when and to what degree the earth tilts on it axis or what type of orbit we revolve around the Sun? I think the easier task at hand would be to find out who and for what reason the climate change agenda has so enamoured the media and our politicians.
we cannot “decide” climate - it will happen with or without us - the earth will do its own thing and we may not be able to live anymore
That's easy; the ecologists that think they know how we all should live. Now that they have a voice in Bidens government and mainstream media it's time to declare war on progress.
@@theblondeone8426 It has always been here even before man arrived. We are just speeding it up with our emissions.
Nobody (that I know of) in climate science claims that we now decide what kind of climate we live in; what you’re making here is a straw man argument and you probably know it or at least should be able to comprehend. What bothers me is the « all or nothing » theme in yours and similar arguments: if I can’t have a total control, why bother at all.. Surely you see that’s a very wrong approach to anything in real life, since you have a very limited control on everything around you and still you go about your life and (hopefully) try your best to improve your life and also provide the same for those around you, right?
Yes, that statement he made was just so childlike as though someone asked him what he wanted from father Christmas. Ridiculous brain dead talking points unless his quote was taken out of context.
Except for the blathering fool at the end this was absolutely the best condensed history of climate's impact on Western civilization and the world.
Fine documentary, but hard to concentrate, with all the dramatic music in the background.
What percentage of green houses gasses every year are from humans compared to natural events like volcanos and fire?
There was an eruption in Sumatra too in the same year.
yea but what about the later volcano eruption later in the 19th century that my great great grandad had to endure in England . .
Monumental hubris to think that we have anything more than a miniscule effect on climate, by intent or misadventure. No we are not out of the ice age, merely at the end of a warm period. No democracy did not return after 2000 years with the French revolution, various levels of broadly democratic governance was in a number of polities.🙄🙄🙄
ofb, records show that since modern man arrived the Earth has been heating up faster. We are a LARGE part of the climate warming, not miniscule as you said. Concrete and asphalt, which is taking over, reflect heat back into our atmosphere. Forests, prairies and grasslands do not, they absorb heat. They are dissappearing at a fast rate because of mans overpopulation.
After all this you end this documentary that says the world is warming because of humans in the last 100 years or so. ? What about volcanos, the suns output, the earths orbit. Are you really serious! .
Another documentary reported it was Krakatoa in 536 and 542. Even Chinese sources reported on a huge bang from the Southwest. I doubt any recent volcano would have been as loud that you could have heard it in Eastern Asia.
Pretty great overview on weather and its effects on humans but very Eurocentric and doesn't talk about the rest of the world in my opinion
Europe centric documentary
Imagine that...made by Europeans too. I heard that most of human intelligentia lives outside of the Western world, so looking forward to a new better and more accurate documentary. Cheers
Battle of teutonbourg, battle of germanic tribes with arminius ?
It was the Germanic tribes vs the Roman Legions led by Publius Varus. They were slaughtered to a man and all of their standards were taken.
I thought it was supposed to be another huge volcano which erupted in about 536, Krakatoa. Or was it both?
And this was: How climate made EUROPEAN history (and let's mentioned something about a couple of volcanos that affected us in other parts of the world )
The idea that man can agree to return to the horse and cart is madness. The idea that man could change the climate even if he agreed to is more madness.
"Climate change
United Nations
Climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperatures and weather patterns, mainly caused by human activities, especially the burning of fossil fuels."
LOL, such a narrow, political motivated, agenda driven definition. Climate change does not have to be 'mainly' human caused as this Documentary clearly shows.
yes in the past this was true, but if you read the charts since the industrial revolution co2 and temperature are both rising together exponentially, which shows a clear correlation. So, just bc climate change was caused by other things historically does NOT mean that its not caused by industry this time around
Its not even partly due to humans. Ignore that last minute of ignorance. CO² makes up 0.00041% of the atmosphere and we have only contributed 0.00013% of the CO² in the atmosphere since the beginning of the industrial revolution. Computer models are bullshit.
And yet, it's been less than 100 years since we've been using oil for energy. We don't know the long term effects.
Hypothetical speculation using computer modeling, with room for human error, of what might, may, could happen, should NOT give any burocracy power to write legislation towards.
This is why the space exploration efforts will help us to confront & deal with all the incidental climatic variations, through technology.
Barring catyclismic events pretty large populations will be able to survive & thrive in self contained eco globes spread over diverse continents to preserve humanity, much like a seed bank. Each would contain all the digitized records of our people so in the case of 9 tenths being destroyed a rebirth of a society would be made possible by the survivor.
We are an extremely vulnerable species,not irreplaceable,esp by artificial A.I,life forms, which could ultimately prove to be our hardier & more successful outer space heirs.
Who knows which plans have been set in place by the powers that be.
@@MelissaR784 but over half of the total cumulative CO2 has been emitted since 1990. The data proves, not hypothetical, the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and global temps. Models have become more accurate and continue to do so. Government's role is exactly to manage society's rules for the greater benefit of all.
21:40 "In the 14th century over 1/3 of Europe's population fell victim to the Black Death."
And this is related to the volcanic winter roughly 800 years earlier how?
It was actually related to an eruption in the 1100 that caused Africa to become cold enough for the plague bacilli to be released by its origin species.
Yes, they made a bit of a jump in time scales: 1st century AD it starts getting cooler, causing migrations towards the Roman Empire in the 4th century and the cooler temperatures then caused malnourishment causing the Black Death to be more devastating in the 1340s.
sounds plausible but here they claim that at the time of 1ad.. the earths climate became cold and that caused stresses that made the Roman empire fail.. except that Rome didn't really fall till 400 ad.. it took another 136 years for their to be an extended winter caused by a volcanic eruption.. However the eastern roman empire didn't fall till 1453.. 1400 years is a kinda long time dudes..
best
Bruce Peek
If you do not watch RUclips videos and do not watch the MSM life is pretty quiet and peaceful for most people.
Absolutely.
There exists nothing as peaceful life in the universe
Ignorance is only bliss until ignoring is no longer possible. Then you’re unprepared and become a victim. Ignorance also means taking zero responsibility, and free riding off of others.
..''the Germanic tribes didn't stand a chance..''...tell Varus that..!
Great documentary about climate changed and it is bound to occur again.
Yes, a lot of these documentaries occur again. Without climate change they are so boring!
1st world countries already have the ability to trap CO 2 and so forth the factories make. Our greenhouses actually need that CO 2 to grow things and are having a hard time getting it because of these green new deals punishing them for recycling it. All the green new deals do is push it factories to countries where their systems are less developed, workers have horrible conditions, and they cause more pollution and they aren't going to join us in stopping, not until they can afford to. Making it so hard to do business in our own countries is only hurting the world more it's not helping. Also, by their own admission we are still in a warming period.
CO2 does not control the climate. But yes a warmer world is a better world. Think about that when you are freezing this winter without gas to warm your home.
A better world for who Dutchman? What about the rising temps which is causing people to continually run their air conditioners? People having to leave their homes because of rising sea levels like in Florida. Warmer is NOT better, colder is NOT better. The balance of the two is better but man is destroying that balance.
@@markd6634
You know why sea level in Scotland, Scandinavia or Alaska is falling ?
tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?id=9450460
That is the biggest reason sea level in Florida is rising.
If we have a tool to harness the power of the water cycle, we can tailor climate to what the planet needs to accommodate us and biodiversity. My book Pluvicopia shows how to build such tools and explores the power with which we can design the planet's operation.
I thought it was Krakatoa (first eruption) that erupted around 536 ad and caused the volcanic winter. There are documenties on it.
Maybe but what I’ve learned over the years is that nobody, even experts, fully know what happened in the past. Just educated guesses by flawed humans
They talk about it just after 15 minutes in
The Germanic tribes did not stand a chance? Since Rome never conquered Germany I think they stood a chance
Climate changes does Not reflect human activity but instead reflects changes in the Earth's tilt and orbit.
Yep.
Both and vulcanism also.
Excellent! I hope that the collective we decide to do something before it’s too late🙏
there is no collective we and never will be.
"We are at that point where WE can decide what sort of climate we will have in the future". " stable temperature climate for all future generations". What utter nonsense and ridicolous "conclusion". Climate has always been changing and always will. Guess there is money in making such nonsense
Very Eurocentric and narrow in scope, tell us more on how the Chinese civilisation were affected, also India, the Middle East, Africa, The Americas etc
Why have you not stated the ‘experts ‘ academic credentials.
Get factual oxymoronic….
Wow, guess I never really knew exactly why Rome fell but it was due to an unsecured border 13:45
The problem with the volcano is where is the obsidian? So maybe it was an asteroid or comet since you people always seem to ignore the fact of ASTEROIDS being the cause!🤔🤔
This episode focused on Europe only.... A vulcanic eruption in Europe is said to affect the whole world- without giving reference to events in other continents. However, I Observed that warm climate has proved to be better in history than cold climate. My question then is, why are we bothered about the impact of Human activity on global warming? The climatic events that destroyed the world in the past are not caused by it's inhabitants but by the disposition of natural order, why then are we currently concerned about Global warming? Namaste
fair point. the point is to prepare for what's coming as people are already being displaced. Should we just let them drowned? Industrialization played a major factor in the rate at which people who never even industrialized are losing their islands. The point is to take accountability for the harm that was done, relocate, and make a way for their culture to survive what we did. That we cannot control major climatic events certainly does not excuse us from what we can and should control nor the consequences of harming one another. Even if we do not cause the next climatic event should we not at least attempt to prepare, help, make a way for survival for our fellow humans and our progeny? That is quite an immature, short sided, self centered, and frankly unethical take away. Namaste
because, propaganda, they're using it to push a global governance and population displacements.
536 to 1346 when the black death arrived is more than 800 years.. not exactly direct causation.
best
Bruce Peek
There is a very interesting video here on YT that claims in the next 100 years the climate will become warm enough in Russia that they'll finally be able to use their MASSIVE territory in order to farm, extract massive amounts of untouched rare minerals, open up quicker ways to the pacific for trade when the ice melts in Russias northern ocean and gain access to the lands oil. Supposedly Russia have never been able to tap into these areas, which make-up 70% of their country, because of the cold temperature and theendless amounts of 30,000 yr. oLd permafrost that denies them access to the resources underneath.When this happen it will make Russia insanely wealthy which will turn them into a super p
Theyre already a superpower and that video is wrong. We're facing a cold few decades or more. Shut down of the AMOC and the next grand minimum solar cycle.
If it would happen in real time, then Russian Federation not only becoming the Super Power (already it is); rather it would be the Supreme Authority in World Order... and guess what would happen to others ....
A lot of videos say a lot of things. Over the past 60 years, not one "scientific" predictions have ever come to pass. Just saying.
Whomever is the bread basket is in control. So probably, yes. But I'll be long gone by then.
This is why the US wants to destabilize Russia so badly. There is going to be a huge migration into Russia. Their borders will be over run on all sides.
Why no subtitles or Closed Captions?
Because of rising sea levels.
@@grip2617 😆
@ 43:00 Don't you just love ignorant superstitious people? Always can be relied on to make poor choices in tough times.
There are still plenty around..unfortunately
How did humans manage to 'change Earth's climate' prior to, and during, the Roman era as implied by the use of the UN's definition of 'climate change' attached to this video?
Goats and cows: overgrazing causes desertification. The Chinese recently returned a large area from desert back to fertility, mainly removing excess gracing and some terracing.
Those Little Ice Age flooding rivers are now running dry.. so… where’s those witches?
Dont worry theyre coming in the next decade. Facing the next grand solar minimum and a shutdown of the AMOC. Its going to get very cold before too long.
So througout the whole video the times where people dies struggled and revolted were preceded by the cold periods, but now at the end they try to say that getting warmer will make this happen. Weird
1:36 the Earth has been orbiting the sun for billions of years not thousands of years. Who makes a jeuvanile error like this...?
What?
If I receive a bill for climate change, i'll send it to the Sun...
This programme shows that the humans can't control climate change yet. What determines climate change are astronomical events like solar activity, earth position and others earth orbital movements and etc... Inside our planet the main factor are vulcanic eruptions that through silica and sulfur on the atmosphere that reflects the sun light and cools down the planet. The effect of human activity? Well it's warming up the planet a bit, but I think that we are creating more histeria than look at the facts. First is only human activity heating up the planet, or astronomical events are on play? Second, in this documentary it was quite evident that we should be worried by the planet cooling and short mini glacial ages. I think that we shoul be less worried about climate change and much more about a nuclear armageddon, that could end our spices and several other. And this would be the first time that humans abruptly interfere in climate change and created an nuclear mini glacial era.
It's time for us to talk less on climate change and more in nuclear disarmament.
Climate causes wars. Current unrest included. That was the point of the doc.
But not to worry, the water cycle is the most potent force if we can invoke it, as my book Pluvocopia shows.
RUclips is great, but it lets people make unsupported claims. My book shows all the necessary meteorological theories, although the engineering is just for argument's sake. But if the meteorology is correct, the engineering is doable.
This 2-part series is about climatic history of Europe only, or Euro-centric at best.
But Europe is only 6.8% of Earth's land area (not even 2% of total Earth surface) and second "smallest", after Australia, of the accepted list of continents (I wouldn't call Europe a continent, on the basis of geography but part of Eurasia). Why should anyone from the other continents (with the exception of North America, may be), should see this?
By all means, make your own documentary
This documentary was made by a German production team so it stands to reason that it would be Eurocentric. I've gotten to the stage now that I can tell which country made a certain programme I am watching simply by the bias in the narrative to this or that country.
Great video but also a bunch of hooey.
This silly statement is based on what, not history?
Sadly, Anne never finished school.
I agree...a lot of hooey
🙄 which part?
@@Wayzor_ 😂😂😂
Grand Solar Minimum is about to lead us to a new ice age...
Of course. And all the other factors like the Malenkovich cycles and time.
But very, very, very slowly and very gradually. Not in my lifetime, not in the lifetime of my children or grandchildren.
@@grip2617 we're at the peak of the warming period. Climate will keep on warming, (nothing to do with carbon) and then drop. It can be brutal if the gulf stream suddenly slws down.
Stop with the subtitles, just dub in English, I often work around the house as I listen to these, and subtitles are REALLY annoying!
i agree haha i do the same thing
The Irish propogated Christianity throughout the world? Are you insane?
Too bad they didn't have John Kerry and his jet!
What?
What a shockingly deliberate piece of propaganda. It selectively and inaccurately over attributes climatic determinism to history. Warming periods are attributed to solar activity, and cooling periods to volcanos. Warming is portrayed as life-giving and responsible for civilization, and cooling as unstable and disastrous for humans. What’s ignored are the effects of civilization on climate, particularly land-use and agriculture. Civilizations began clearing clearing forests with the first cities. In particular, rice plantations in China produced significant methane. Continental rewilding occured with the fall of antiquity and the depopulating of the Americas. We know that atmospheric chemistry has a more significant impact on temperature and precipitation than solar effects. In fact, changes in the Milankovich cycles have impacts over much longer time scales because of the impact on the carbon cycle. What’s insidious is not only inaccuracies, over-generalizations, reverse causalities, and biased interpretations - it is that the entire documentary is crafted to manipulate environmental understanding and advance an ideological agenda. There is no limit to the greed and immorality of these people!
Krakatoa caused this in 536 AD this is a case of my volcano 🌋 bigger than your volcano 🌋🤣🤣.
Endkommentar: total bullshit. Macht die relativ gute Arbeit von 2 stunden Zunichte. Der extreme Eurozentrismus der zweiten Episode ist laecherlich, tragisch, aergearlich.
Einfache fragen. Who produced this "Eurozentrismus bullshit" program shining intellectual star? Any Chinese, African, Middle eastern Islamic, latin American country is more than welcome to go to the tremendous effort of producing and spreading via the internet a program reflecting their subjective portrayal on the history of the planet,the effects of climatic variables on civilizations, humanity,eco systems & history.
Please stop negating your own culture with such negativity..b
To conclude ,Western society has had the most profound of any other culture to date of influencing every single culture on the planet with its progressive post religiae scientific approach to problem solving for the future. Food for some thought maybe?
Why only europe and white people?
What about rest of the world?
umm they covered el salvadore, the mesoamericas, and asia
Watch again and pay better attention.
We can decide what climate we wanna live in by being able to control it? This was the dumbest statement I've heard recently.
This is very interesting, but too simplistic. Following this logic, it's the climate change that is bombing Ukraine currently.
What a perfect excuse to neglect the human influence on the rising CO2 levels and heating of the earth! Thanks, Oil industry !!!
Sun explored elliptical to earth we can observe this , typhoon,particles same pattern! Continue your wrong explanation, few people knows how's important to hide the truth.
Please Stop the adds now. Why you not stop this site?
The adds are what get you free watching!.
@@adamakaru2683 The word is spelled ads. Perhaps you know this, but Daye Rotth does not .
Ads pay the bills. Grow up.
Control climate LOLOL