Yeah…me and my friend had an argument over text about it All for One was technically the first One for All user in My Hero Academia. It was a very stupid tbh.
Fun Fact: The real difference between a muffin and a cupcake isn't whether or not it has icing, but what batter is used to make them. Therefore, a muffin with icing is still a muffin, and a cupcake without icing is still a cupcake.
I had an argument in kindergarten about which direction was left and which one was right. We were sitting on opposite sides of the table and didn't understand "my left vs your left"
Once had an argument with a friend about whether the Coriolis Effect would curve a bullet left or right After 15 minutes we realized we were both arguing the same side but were so bad at articulating our points that we thought we were arguing
I am imagining a hilarious situation where you were both right, or and even funnier situation where, as you were both in kindergarten, you were both wrong.
I was at school when they turned on the Large Hadron Collider for the first time. A girl told me she wasn't worried about the black hole because it was microscopic, so she wouldn't fit into it. I had the weird experience of having to concede to her that the LHC wasn't dangerous, but also that this was the wrong reason not to be worried about black holes.
If the LHC generated a BH, it would have a radius of something like 1 millionth the size of a proton. It would fly through the earth like a neutrino, without interacting with anything because it was so small Not to mention, it would instantly evaporate due to Hawking Radiation
I once got in a legitimate shouting match with a friend of mine about whether death is an activity, and every so often the argument comes up again and ends up in a shouting match again. We're both archaeologists.
@@comradewindowsill4253 That's why we were talking about death as activity in the first place: arguing over whether the presence of a corpse is proof of human activity on a prehistoric site.
@@lucyhartwell2134 Those are two very different questions. The first one is asking if death is an activity, the other one if a corpse proves human activity. "Activity" =/= "human activity". That's an english problem. Switch you argument in latin. Activity becomes "actio", and human activity becomes "humana operatio." You guys just happen to speak english. = Let's start by defining our shit: Human activity means there are humans. An activity is something you do to get out of the house and fight boredom. = Second question, does a corpse proves human activity on a prehistoric site ? Yes, of course. First question, is death an activity ? Of course not.
I mean, dying is something you can do, so...I'd say it's an activity. Laying there. Dying. It definitely eats up your schedule and doesn't leave much room for other activities does it?
"Is a frog a fish?" obviously not, they're amphibians, but we spent the entire class period arguing anyway. the worst thing about this though? The two sides of the argument were the entire class vs. the teacher. the Teacher thought a frog was a fish.
My class had almost the exact same argument except the teacher thought frogs were reptiles. He bet us a bot of donuts that he was right and researched it when he got home. He arrived next class with donuts.
a 3 hour fierce debate about pasta shapes with my italian roomate that ended with "if u call it noodles one more time I'll throw ur tamagatchi in the toilet" before they slamed their door and started blasting italian music.
The dumbest argument I've gotten into was when i brought up that "Is the word Grinch his name, job or ethnicity?" Tweet to my brother Anyway it got pretty heated so we asked my mom for her opinion and she just said "it's his name, his full name is Elias P. Grinch" Then my brother left the room and i was like "wait is that really his full name???" And she said, completely stone-faced "what? No, I just made that up."
Actually, that's not too far from the truth. Okay, not really, but apparently Suess said at some point that his name was to be Godwin Grinch, but he shortened it as his character design developed to its more "uncouth" state. He actually did have a full name, at least at the earlier stages of his design. Okay, in hindsight, might have had one too many Dr. Seuss documentaries on my part. Neat tidbit though.
We were in kindergarten or preschool. We both were very convinced we knew right from left and got into such a shouting match that her mom came over. Technically we were both correct--we just didn't understand that one person's right and left aren't on the same sides as the other person's _when you're facing each other._
I just fell out of my chair after reading this, sounds like something I would do. But not only in kindergarten or preschool. I most likely still do it to this day, my brain isn't braining. ;)
Omg the same argument happened to me! We were so mad that we ended up breaking up our friendship. (We were in kindergarten, when people said “I’m not going to be your friend anymore” all the time) Then a teacher came over and showed us that my right looks left to the person standing in front of me. We were confused at first, then we spun around testing how our left and right changes when it’s mirrored, and we ended up laughing because we were both stupid.
FUN FACT the importance of the person does not define whether it's an assassination, it's whether or not the murder was politically motivated. only politically motivated murder can be called an assassination
I once had a HEATED all-caps argument with my friend on how to spell croissant. She INSISTED it was spelled “cwossa” and/ or “cwoassant”. The argument came to a close when she got distracted by a photo of Mr. Clean someone else in the group chat sent because she thought it looked like her former math teacher.
i once got into a debate with my father about what constituted a sport. he eventually ended up backing himself into a corner and claiming that war is the only sport.
My sister and I had an hours long argument that ended in her crying over whether humans technically count as straws because of our digestive tracts. We were both already adults by that point.
Baker here!! The muffins/cupcakes debate is actually settled because cupcakes are determined by how much you mix the batter, meaning the texture after baking will be different. You can put icing on a muffin and it's still a muffin. A cupcake is also still a cupcake regardless of icing under the same rule. Thanks for coming to my Ted talk 👋
good god, that entire argument about the pots and pans made me laugh so hard, especially "if you can't boil an egg in it, then it's not a pot, you jackass!"
they wouldn't. unless mermaids are humans who have evolved and there is remnants of a knee left over (i believe something similar can be found in some whales) then its just a tail and tails don't have knees. its like saying a fish has knees. just sounds wrong lmao
@@a-mae-zing-mae8541 If you search for MIL-C-44072C you should find it And it's that long because it establishes shipping, defects and scientific standards for the ingredients
I love the utter contempt matt has for that argument about the dress. The stupidest argument I have ever had is probably all the agruments I have had with my mum about whether various clothing items and blankets are green. She thinks i am colour blind, i think she is overly generous in what things are green
Yeah people who call teal/turqoise stuff green really baffle me. Same with calling red stuff orange when it's even like, _slightly_ orange. Like thas red motherfucker
Once had an entire family debate over dinner that turned into a screaming match because we couldn't figure out whether you drown or suffocate in *milk* It only ended because the fridge just randomly spat out an ice cube and the entire table went silent. We didn't speak again for the entire meal.
Not a single one of your family members realized that "suffocate" and "drown" are synonyms when used in relation to liquids as the air-supply blockage? Suffocation is the lack of air due to obstruction, while drowning is a specific type of suffocation wherein the obstruction is liquid.
Is anything a hole? It's still on one plane, just indented slightly. And if it goes all the way through something, then it's still part of the same plane, right? I don't know what I'm saying. Ignore me. Or start a fight, I don't care. Just know that whatever I say, I'm a dumbass, so don't take my advice seriously.
He definitely thinks, whether or not he projects his thoughts on jon's mind or if jon is specifically a cat mind reader is not clear I think the 2nd is more probable since the dog who i forgot the name doesn't respect garfield's desire, jon could not be a general mind reader cause he cannot read the mind of another humans and i think his interactions with the dog are less accurate
Garfield thinks. Jon doesnt communicate Garfield directly like he would with a person normally, he just assumes what is Garfield thinking because of his owner-pet bonding.
@epictoast I don’t think so. Her spell was specifically aimed at all existing animus dragons. So if they were not hatched, the spell would still apply because they existed when the spell was cast. But they can still have the gene to pass on to future generations and new animus dragons and still hatch because she never said anything about new animus dragons.
If someone was able to get all the shards together would animus magic be restored? When jeraboa placed the spell she only said when the item is broken. So if it was put together would it be fixed? What would work to fix it? Glue, flamesilk or something else? My opinion is that it would bring back animus magic but you couldn't use a normal item like glue/tape and if you were trying to put it back together you would need an icewing gift.
A friend and I got into an argument over if penguins are birds. Their argument was that, because penguins don't fly, they don't count as birds. I asked them what a penguin is if it isn't a bird, and they replied "whatever it is, it isn't a bird". We were seniors in high school.
My partner and I once had a 3-hour long debate about the Cars universe. If they have to take off their tyres at the airport, that implies car TSA, which then implies car 9/11, car Al Quaeda, car Ronald Reagan, etc. Are aeroplanes sentient? Were the sentient aeroplanes working with Bin Laden? We ended up wasting an entire Sunday afternoon and skipped out on going to the pub.
@@reizinhodojogo3956 The tractors are used as cattle and there are Volkswagen Beetle shaped flies, so I guess it's reasonable to assume that there are some sort of a car monkey
But... it's a search engine... that would be like citing the local library as your source instead of the books/articles you read in that library. Or maybe even more accurately citing the index of said library
Seriously as an autistic asexual who loves complementing people and has trouble differentiating platonic and romantic connection do you have a good answer?
@@NotThisAnonymous Well, you may give the word a dictionary definition, such as "sexual behavior that suggests interest in the other person, genuine or playful", but people are still gonna disagree on what actually constitutes flirting. To some, it can be a simple "hello" or an interested look, while others would only realize that someone's flirting with them if they literally grab them by the crotch lol.
One time when I was a little kid, my dad and I got into an argument over whether a bug we saw outside was a bee or a wasp. He said he would show me a picture and explain the difference and I simply responded with "I KNOW WHAT I SAW."
Well in general, smooth bees are wasps, fuzzy wasps are bees, and if it doesn’t have wings it’s probably an ant. And also like Kevser said, wasps are mostly carnivorous while you won’t get a bee trying to eat other insects.
I once argued that pineapples are more dangerous then watermelons because of the spikes. My friend replied that the watermelon was more dangerous because of the mass. So we decided to take some research, we did a total of 4 tests, each test, The watermelon ended up winning, We had 5 pages of research and results. My friend won, and I gave her 2 dollars and a Snickers bar. Edit: My friend has read your comments, and she saw how people think Durian is a good contender, so we will redo our tests, and will report back on our results. Edit 2: Durian won, fellas
I remember one time I was watching Markiplier's Until Dawn gameplay with my brother and I heard the sound of a bird flying and I said it was a pigeon (because pigeons make a 'whistling' sound when they flap their wings) but he said it was a crow and we started yelling at each other (it was 3 AM) until I went to sleep in frustration. The next day we rewatched the video and discovered it was an eagle.
The most heated up argument I've been in was "what was first the chicken or the egg". It happened during 2nd year of uni in the kitchen of a shared house of 4 people. It ended when everyone stormed off of the kitchen swearing and calling each other names and retreating to our respective rooms so we could cool down. We didn't talk to the guys on the otherside of the argument for a couple of weeks. 10/10
The answer is objectively the egg, there were millions of egg-laying animals millions of years before chickens even existed. If the question is wether the chicken or the egg containing a chicken specifically came first the answer would still be the egg because chickens were domesticated from the junglefowl and it would've been a semi-domesticated junglefowl that laid the first egg with a true chicken inside.
Once got asked this during some Christian trivia night I was forced to attend and according to them it was the chicken because God made all animals mature. The answer above seems like a good point too.
@@mamutepeq Yes exactly I have no idea how this is even still an argument like I figured this out as a child how are there still people who can't understand this very simple logic?
My Dad used to lead my local Beavers (the level before Cubscouts) group. At some point an argument developed between some of the kids and my Dad, over whether they could run faster than a kicked football. This resulted in my Dad bringing a ball, us all going outside, him kicking it, and us trying to beat it to the end of the field. This was intended to prove his point once and for all, but became a semi-regular activity because everyone wanted another go. I'll repeat that: some 5 to 8 year olds thought they could run faster than 60mph (the rough average speed of a kicked football), they raced against a ball doing about 65 mph, and they then kept trying this almost weekly afterwards. Strangely enough, the football won.
@twinostrich8045 so what's the secret to this new generation of record breaking sprinters in the Olympics? "Me da made us race a footy when we were kids cos carl said he could beat it". Fascinating! Genius!
In my freshman Spanish class, while learning about furniture, there was a legitimate argument about whether pillows were mattresses because you could sleep on them. This eventually changed to whether couch pillows were pillows or mattresses.
all of these question either involve concepts we made up and so have no correct answer, or do have a correct answer that can be easily verified within seconds
The pot / pan arguments is absolutely hilarious to me because it reminds me of an argument a streamer got into with his chat about whether or not there are actually pots in Breath of The Wild (the cooking pots are based on woks but without a handle, so they look like giant stone bowls over a campfire). The argument never went anywhere, and eventually devolved into chat and the streamer deciding that bread is soup, and it's still one of the most hilarious clips I've ever seen in my whole life.
@@EllpaFox47ok SOOOO The cube rule of food is a crude way of identifying what a food it based on starch content. Here are the classifications: No starch: Soup 1 side: Toast 2 sides: Sandwich 3 sides: Taco 4 sides: Roll 5 sides: Bread bowl 6 sides: Calzone 2 or more layers: Cake Filled Cube: Bread Hope this clears things up :)
@@TheBillyBoi123 Wouldn't that make bread a calzone? because its always all bread and completely enclosed by bread on all sides? How did they come to the conclusion of soup?
I always send these videos to my best friend when they come out. They always help her feel better and make her happy, and it's fun to talk about them a little after we've both watched them. Thank you for continuing to brighten both of our days, Matt 💀
For some reason, Matt’s videos are the only text commentary videos that actually make me laugh. The others I just watch as podcasts or something to listen to in the background while doing something, but Matt’s videos genuinely make me happy and laugh.
The grammar debate had me laughing. At least English grammar has grammar rules. Icelandic is so chaotic we make it up as we go. Be happy you have that problem.
I had a year long argument with one of my friends in school if Narwhals were real or not, I ended up putting papers for the entire school to vote on: "Are Narwhal real? YES or NO" my overwhelming victory wasn't enough to convince her, nor did the natural geographic documentaries, "they could be CGI" she said "they could be costumes with two people inside, like those horse ones" she exclaimed "they could be robots like those tiny fish toys that swim in pools" she proclaimed! This was hell, WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD THEY MAKE A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT A FAKE ANIMAL!?!? Either way after one of the longest years of my life and some of the dumbest points in the world, made by both parties, I finally convinced her. But she still gives me the death stare every time they are mentioned, I'm convinced that after 6 months she was just disagreeing with me out of pure spite.
Had an argument that lasted for weeks with my friends about how dolphins would get around on land if they could survive out of water. I said they would log roll, one of my friends insisted they would ride scooters, and another genuinely said they would just levitate.
The problem with most cetaceans (at least the big ones) is that they rely on being in water to support their bodies. Beach a big whale and the main cause of death will be that it was crushed by it’s own body weight. I’m not sure if this applies to “smaller” dolphins such as the bottlenose, spinner, or Commerson’s dolphin- but it does apply to the larger ones like orcas. I do think moisterization could be a factor too, but I’m not sure of that either.
I was thinking of how the hell would a dolphin riding a scooter be rational LOL but then I realized was your friend just thinking about Dr. Blowhole from the Penguins of Madagascar TV series???
Once when I was a kid, I asked my mom to take a picture of me. She said yes, but on her way to get the camera, her partner at the time who I'll call Rick was like "HOW WERE YOU SO EASILY PERSUADED BY A KID!?" as though taking a couple of pictures was somehow harmful. The argument escalated to the point where Rick punched a hole in the wall, somehow taking out a light switch in the process. Meanwhile I was sitting there posing and waiting.
Fun Fact: These kinds of arguments are exactly why the Guiness Book of World Records was created The 2 creators were having an argument about something dumb, and realized 'it would be amazing if there was a book that kept track of stuff like this'
@/hvtrs8%2F-wuw%2Cymuvu%60e%2Ccmm-cjalngl-UAaEcf8FvReLsrEPq%3AI%409WpC I thought it was weird the two names were the same. It just means i'm too stupid to make the connection.
I vaguely remember about a year or so ago I got into a heated argument with my mom about “if you bake cookies and cook bacon, why are they named that way”. I ended up yelling “why don’t I just call cookies bakies then, and bacon cookon?” and my mom left the room immediately.
My sister and I once got into an argument over whether or not Idaho borders Canada. We were in the car and this was before Smartphones where you could just look anything up right away. When we got back to a computer, turned out I was right, and we both laughed ourselves sick.
Imagine your only knowledge of Idaho being based on Alpha and Omega, holy frick. I guess that's why that movie was so popular in elementary school. Kids must've flipped when they found out their home-state was in a popular children's film. EDIT: I lived in Idaho during Elementary School
@@DaNintendude I don't have to imagine lol, I'm Canadian, and I didn't even know Idaho existed until I watched Alpha and Omega. And I still don't really know anything about it other than it has a forest and borders Canada.
@@F.R.E.D.D2986 I said it did. She said it didn't. And I have no idea how we even got into that topic in the first place, LOL. We live in, and were driving through, Indiana.
Throughout the last few years of my secondary school two girls had a famous and genuinely passionate years long argument about whether if you cut a sandwich in half you now have two sandwiches or one sandwich in two halves. People would randomly bring up he topic when they were both in the room and enjoy the fallout
It’s kinda like breaking a cookie in half isn’t it. They’re two sandwiches but they used to make up one whole one. Either answer isn’t necessary wrong. It’s all based on your perspective.
My entire physics class (me included) once got into an argument about whether the shaker cheese in pizza parlors was a powder or not. It was pretty much the whole class saying it was a powder against this one very persuasive guy who said it was "shredded." Let me tell you, I'm not lying when I say this shit got INTENSE. We were citing sources, at one point I pulled out a CHEESE PHASE DIAGRAM (don't ask), We were doing dramatic readings of rheology textbooks, someone found an article on the shear modulus of cheese types, and someone else even cited some guy on Quora named Ilgaz Soykal (yes we are all massive fucking nerds). We were arguing about this for the WHOLE CLASS (it was a substitute teacher, and the class didn't have many lectures anyway). After class, someone ended up asking the chemistry teacher, and she said it was a powder, so tAKE THAT, DAVE. To this day, mentioning cheese around any of those people triggers a fight-or-flight response.
0:32 That guy who said "Go Banana!" Is so wholesome. He motivates the banana, and doesn't care at all about anyone's counterarguement, honestly, my heart goes out to you, potterpockets.
Got into an argument with my friends about whether a bungalow was a type of house or its own separate thing They insisted it was different even after I pulled up the definitions for 'bungalow' AND 'house'
@@comradewindowsill4253 Interesting, also I just checked and it says a Cottage can be a Bungalow, but it has some weird properties like sloppy roofs or added second stories... what All I can say is on 3rd of middle school House type vocabulary was the only thing I had totally wrong on my quizzes and exams of English class 😅
my sister and dad once got into the hugest fucking argument about who got to cut the pineapple we were gonna eat, it escalated so far that my dad ended up hiding the pineapple and my sister pushed a chair over so hard it left a gash in the floor (the story ended with my dad sneaking me the whole pineapple before I left for uni again, so I actually gained something from the argument lol)
I died at the pot/pan discussion 😂😂 I’d love for another video like this once again some time. Matt narrating this makes it so good. *bloody jacuzzi for guinea pigs*
My family will get into very heated arguments about hypotheticals. Like "would you rather be able to visit 5 countries for free and stay as long as you like or know every language." Seriously, that one got us shout fighting for hours with people picking sides and vehemently defending their choice while claiming the other was the stupid choice. I have four siblings so there's a lot to fight about.
I'd personally like to know every language. I've no interest in traveling out of my country, and knowing languages would be very useful for interacting with a ton of people, or consuming non-English media
knowing every single language is a million times more useful than just getting to be a tourist for a while. you would be able to communicate fluently with literally everyone on earth
I jokingly mentioned to some friends that I could spend an hour arguing over who would win in a fight between Mr Incredible and Darth Vader. This evolved into an actual 90 minute analysis between a few of us.
@@versatile.introvert After a LOT of arguing about what did and didn't count (we used the main Star Wars films as a guide rather than the entire Legends or Disney expanded universes), we decided that Mr. Incredible wins about 60% of the time, assuming they're fighting 1v1 in a generic urban area. To sum up the advantages each side had: Darth Vader - Has a Lightsaber that can probably bypass Mr. Incredible's durability (this is huge). Can use Telekinesis, though note that we concluded that it'd be hard to hurt Mr. Incredible directly with this (no Force Choking for example). Has more years of training/experience. Mr. Incredible - Has better agility and especially mobility. Despite having super strength, he is a tactical fighter who usually defaults to fighting from a distance against foes that have obvious melee advantages. Uses large objects like debris as projectiles, which can't be deflected as easily as Star Wars Blasters, and is strong enough to use projectiles larger than Darth Vader can simply brush away with telekinesis. Has fought a wider variety of foes, and thus will be more used to fighting someone like Darth Vader than vice versa. Improved mobility implies that he'll have the high ground. Does not wear a cape. Both - Have improved perception, either due to the Force or enhanced senses. Both also wear armor/suits that provide some light protection.
@@SalnaxI’m late, but funnily enough I just watched a RUclips video about this exact argument lol. I won’t send a link Cus i don’t want you to think I’m a bot but from a channel called French baguette intelligence
Me and a close friend of mine sat next to each other in a very easy psychology course in High School, so naturally we ended up having plenty of time to talk. The arguments we ended up having were possibly the dumbest I have ever even heard of. The highlight for me has to be "What is Mario's last name?" We of course ignored his name on the wiki being "Mario Mario" and eventually concluded after literal weeks of this going on that Mario's last name is "brothers" because all of the games were called "Mario Brothers." This naturally means "Luigi Brothers" is Luigi's full name. Both of them also had the title of "Super" hence the games being called "Super Mario Brothers."
I mean, your conclusion that their last name is Brothers is flawed, because the "Mario Brothers" in the title is not referring to Mario himself, but is more meant to be like the name of a company, since they are plumbers. And thus, the Mario in the title is the last name, making them Mario Mario and Luigi Mario.
My ex and I got into a very lengthy argument whether the "round, fluffy evergreens" were pines or what. She kept insisting they weren't, nearly had an aneurysm. Turns out she just thought pines were called something else.
This is when I bring out google lmao. I absolutely hate when people insist they're right over something they obviously know nothing about, so instead of arguing, I open google on my phone and turn the screen around so they can read the fucking definition for themselves.
*Dropping a fun fact:* The argument about wheter Jaffa Cakes were cakes or biscuits actually turned into a full-blown LAWSUIT against the company. You see, biscuits are taxed more than cakes. So if they were ruled to be biscuits, McVitie's would have been found guilty of tax evasion. The legal definition of a cake is that 12% of its batter after baking is made up of wet moisture. So Jaffa Cakes are legally considered CAKES as they have a moisture content greater than this.
Me and my friends got into an argument over wether or not it was appropriate for me to say “deez nuts” right before everyone were going to sleep, and it somehow escalated into being about Napoleon’s invasion of The Netherlands. It sounds extremely random but somehow it actually happened.
@@raven.petrichor I sent my friends a bunch of messages that made it appear as if I was going to say something important, but I was actually prancing them as my line of messages ended with deez nutz. These sort of pranks where quite common within our group, and some of us where getting tired of them and felt it was time for us to stop it with these pranks. Not everyone agreed however, and so we began arguing. After some time, one of the arguers said he felt like we were disrespecting and undermining him and so he asked “DO YOU ANY OF YOU IDIOTS EVEN KNOW WHAT THE NETHERLANDS WERE CALLED DURING NAPOLEONIC TIMES?!” as he feels smarter than us because of his knowledge of history. One guy googled the answer, and the guy who shouted said it was wrong. From there onwards, the heated discussion was about Napoleon, and nothing else
@@tacolordc No one disrespects the United Provinces...Unless you're Napoleon, in that case you put your brother on the throne and call it the FUCKING BATAVIAN REPUBLIC I can see why you argued about it though, The Dutch Republics have changed names, emperors, titles and geographic position what feels like every decade for 400-500 years
my friend kept trying to sort all food items into sandwich, salad, soup, or ravioli, which escalated into a shouting match between her and the rest of our table in class about whether or not icecream is a soup. The science teacher ended up getting involved and taking down notes on our arguments because apparently it was "a legitimate, intelligent, intellectual discussion" or something lol Edit: Ok so that you guys can duke it out in the replies, ima give you some of our main arguments. 1. The difference between a soup and a salad is the liquid to solid ratio 2. Icecream, at room temperature, is a liquid, making it a soup. 3. Icecream was not intended to be eaten at room temperature, the intention for how its meant to be consumed matters. 4. Icecream should be a salad instead because you can eat it with a fork (psychopathic but physically you can) and also toppings.
Yanno, I've thought about it... I submit that it's internal. It exists within the eye socket. Fingernails: eternal. They may originate under the skin, but they exist on the surface. Same with hair. Outer ears: external. Tongue: internal, residing inside the mouth, though, like the eye, we can see it. Eyeball: internal, within the hollow, next to the brain. The lid opens & closes like the lips & jaw. Even bulged eyes are within a socket. Now...the nose. That gets tricky...unless we consider it like ears (inner & outer parts)...& even then...
@@echognomecal6742 my reasoning is if it needs to be kept inside you in order to keep working then it's internal. If you lost your eyelids ur eyes wouldnt be able to be moisturized and you wouldn't be able to see. Your ears and nose have internal information receptors, but they are freely exposed to the outside world.
@@mariasicree7533 I see how one could come to that conclusion. An interesting line of thinking, nice. Let's take teeth- If one were to lose one's cheeks & jaw, the remaining teeth would then be, essentially, external. However, that is not their natural state. Making a change to the natural state of something (their surroundings, etc) doesn't change what something fundamentally is. There have been animals & people born with organs outside of their body, such as their heart. That doesn't change it into an external organ. Some animals have a clear, permanent eyelid/cover. Others have a mobile lid that helps it function. If that lid is removed, that's a heck of a problem, but for an internal organ. "...if it needs to be kept inside you in order to keep working then it's internal." Eyes do indeed need to be kept in their sockets. No?
The stupidest argument I've ever had was on whether two lasagnas stacked on top of each other were two lasagnas or one big lasagna. I don't even remember what my stance was.
I'd say the way it came out of the oven constitutes one lasagna. Stacking two pieces does not make it one. Although, I absolutely love the thought of tall lasagna.
The simple answer is… that literally cannot happen. The complex answer is… there is no correct answer, it could be either depending on how genes work out
There was an argument on my bus in high school if water was wet or if it *made* things wet. A war almost broke out and we unintentionally split ourselves across both sides of the bus Oh and it lasted like 2 weeks
Well, it's easy: If water makes things that it touches wet, it therefore must be wet because surface tension decrees that water is always in contact with more water, therefore water is always wet.
This video had restored my faith in social media. I thought it was fucked. But realising that it has bought people together to allow them to argue over which fruit is superior in combat, makes it all worth it.
Who do I think would win? Definetly the gympie-gympie, an Australian plant that is notorious for its stinging hairs that can cause extreme pain and skin reactions that can last for weeks.
Ok but the pans vs pots one is NOT about the handle count, nor solely the depth. It is very specifically the combination of the shape, depth, and usage. A wok is often as deep as a relatively average pot, but saying it is a pot is mental. If it has straight walls large enough to contain a signifcant amount of liquid, and it is commonly used to boil things or make soups, it is most likely a pot.
Dumbest arguement ive ever been in was with my brother about an imaginary stick. We got into a first fight about whose it was. Our mom had to take the IMAGINARY stick
me and my cousin had a similar thing happen except instead of an imaginary stick it was just a regular stick that was shoved into a bbq package. we fought over it for 3 hours in the middle of the woods. still have the stick
@@germaxicus6670 my cousin only visits me in summer or chrostmas cause he lives really far so its mostly mine but he tried to steal it every time hes here
a few days ago, we had a day at my school where everyone had to come dressed up. about eight people came together and decided they would all dress as jesus. when all of my friends saw them walk past, it devolved into a massive screaming argument about if the plural of jesus is jesuses or jesi.
@@sylvanticxI mean, this would be wrong, since -ae is the feminine plural of 1st declension nouns in Latin, while the name Jesus is a masculine 2nd declension noun in Latin. Therefore, Jesi is technically the correct answer in Latin. In English though, I'd argue Jesuses.
@@ashwinnmyburgh9364 Jesus didn't speak Latin. He likely spoke Aramaic. I don't know Aramaic, nor do I know much about Aramaic, but best I can figure out with some googling is that Jesus would have likely pluraled himself as "Yeshe" (ישוע). In Hebrew, this would be something like Y'shu'im (I also don't speak Hebrew, but I know a little from 7 years of Hebrew school and a lot of time in synagogue) (ישועים maybe, but that looks wrong, and I've never been good at spelling in Hebrew, so maybe it's ישוים without the ayin). I'm pretty sure Jesus was supposed to be learned or something, so he might have spoken Hebrew. I don't know why I'm arguing about this, I'm not even Christian.
If -i or -s is used has nothing to with the spelling of the word, that's a "correlation does not imply causation" thing: the difference is if the word has a Greek or Latin origin. The Greeks pluralised with -i, so words with Greek origins still do, while the Latins used -s, -m, -a, or -um, which we've simplified to just the first. Also, English defaults to -s if it's from some other language, a trait we got from French. Keep in mind it gets a bit tricky if the word started out as Greek but became a Latin word by assimilation. For example, we don't say "Phobi" because we don't say "Phobos". "Phobia" is a Latin word, so we're using a middle step. Octopus connects directly to the Greek "oktōpous", with no Latin mid-step. Thus, Octopi. QED, "Jesus" would pluralise as Jesuses, because it is from the Latin "Iēsous".
One time in summer camp, I got into a fight with a girl because she thought she was eating a peach, when in reality, she was eating a nectarine. We argued for about fifteen minutes, and everyone I talked to during the argument said that it was a nectarine. After the argument, she tried to gaslight me into thinking that she had always thought she was eating a nectarine and we never had that argument because she never thought that. You said that it was a peach, *Maxine*
Maxine made a scene talking 'bout her nectarine. A peach she'd said it been, and she wouldn't just come clean, but all of us had seen, and she wasn't all that keen on thinking we'd be mean, but she'd just been a little green. Thought she was the queen, argued like a damn machine. Went on a good fifteen, almost needed some caffeine, it was honestly obscene, when I left it was serene, and we remember it *Maxine*
Probably the BEST arguments I've ever had was about ranking commercial chocolate bars, and that's because it was a philosopher-styled collaborative debate instead of a politician-styled competitive one. When someone presented an argument, it wasn't an attack, but an idea for us both to consider. It was so productive and engaging, I remember it fondly to this day.
Once had an argument about how long a stick had to be before it considered a branch or limb, etc. We had finally reached an understanding when someone brought up that a really small stick is a twig which started it all over again.
A branch is a piece of wood growing out of another (above ground), like a trunk or another branch. A twig is a small branch. A stick is a general word for a thin, roughly cylindrical wooden object or a thin piece of wood
@@dennisdegennaro7459 'Teacher' implies high school to me. In university you do not call your professors 'teachers'. However you can technically go back to high school and study something else. Where I come from many forms of art can be studied by adults at schools as part of a special curriculum, but still part of our secondary education system. In which case the student could be the teacher's doctor. Debate settled?
I vividly remember arguing over which number racecar is the fastest in kindergarten. Everyone else agreed it had to be infinity, whilst I was convinced it was one.
I've gotten into genuine arguments that flutes should be considered brass, not woodwind. Brought them up to music majors and watching them slowly realize I was right was soul crushing.
My mother and I got into an argument about the color of a dress I owned; she kept saying it was green while I insisted it was blue. She very seriously and angrily asked “are you colorblind?!”
I once got into the same argument with my boss about a piece of clothing, and asked her the same thing. I'm just so glad i have a lighthearted boss and we could laugh about it lol
Those colors between blue and green are subjectively perceived differently and men tend to see\classify them more to the one while women do to the other. But I forgot which gender does what. But yeah, had a couple of light arguments with my mom or my sister's about whether something was blue or green
I did an art piece for a member of my DND group, she asked for blue skin so I used a color labelled indigo and the whole group had a fight on whether it was blue or purple
Why do I love this? Why is this my favorite form of content? Watching a bunch of internet users get in the most heated debates over open-ended, incredibly trivial subjects. I need more fruit combat. I need more pot pan differentiation. It's just indulgent stupid humorous fun I could watch for hours
My brother and my dad often get into heated debates about game/TV characters. I sometimes participate if I have really strong feelings, but the two most memorable ones are whether Bendy from the game Bendy and the Ink Machine or Spawn would win in a fight, and the other being what the best spiderman villain was, my brother arguing for mysterio and my dad arguing for lizard and scorpion. It quickly became a yelling match for both these arguments.
Dumbest argument I’ve had: Mother and I arguing over if your spouse was always your best friend. Mom said yes, I said no. I asked my dad and my married brother who their best friends were, both said their male best friends. This led to my mom ignoring us for the rest of the day and giving my dad the cold shoulder.
I had an argument with my cousin for 20 minutes about why scorpions aren't directly related to lobsters/other crustaceans. I compared my point to why nautiluses aren't related to snails because one's a cephalopod and one's a gastropod. I am 100% right, her argument was that scorpions are crusty and that must mean they're crustaceans
@@nelly5954 That has nothing to do with being a biology student, you were arguing with an idio†. I'm sure he didn't think fish are animals either. What did he think insects are, carnivorous plants?
@@ivantheterrible7696 That was an extreme example, but a lot of people think taxonomy is a matter of judgement and not science. His idea of an animal was more like a vertebrate I think. (This gets worse if you're a monophyletic purist, because then claims like "apes aren't monkeys" and "whales aren't fish" become a lot more dubious)
@@nelly5954 You have no idea how right you are. I got into an argument with my father on whether or not prawns and shrimps are a type of fish. I said they were crustaceans and therefore not fish, my father disagreed because our language calls them fish.
@@Mag_ladroth The word "fish" is just a shitshow from start to finish. The commonest scope of definition would imply sharks, trout and humans are all equally fish, but even in this case a crustacean is nothing of the sort.
The dumbest argument I ever got into was an entire class including myself arguing with a girl over the difference between a boulder and a rock. It was the story of Kronos and him eating a boulder instead of Zeus because the class was required to make a Kahoot for greek stories. My class proved to the girl that a boulder is in fact, a rock.
Me and my sister once argued about who was nicer and who aliens would take if they came to earth and had been watching us. We could hear our parents laughing at us in the other room.
the other day, someone tried to correct me on what time it was....... over the internet. long story short, they told me to touch grass, i said "no it's 6:30 am". they said "no it's 8:30" and laughed at me for "not even knowing the right time". i said "bro forgot abt time zones" in chat and they said, all smartass-like, "well, if you live in australia, it's 8:30"...... CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING! *I DONT FUCKING LIVE IN AUSTRALIA LMAO* plus we all have a clock on our internet-accessing device of choice....... i can just look at what time it is...
@@blizzard_the_seal9863 you live in 1/57 places. My guess is america but it could also be. Basse-Terre (Guadeloupe) Basseterre (St. Kitts) Québec Augusta Asuncion Providence Hartford Boston and maybe Blanc-Sablon. However these are just a few options.
@@thatdamncrow9197 Correct! However quick correction FOURTEEN hour difference. You didnt account for AM and PM. In australia it was 6:30 _AM_ and in america it was 8:30 _PM_ . Like I said 14 hour difference also "Canberra ACT, Australia is 14 hours ahead of Washington, DC, USA" So my final guess is this guy lives in the us. My EXACT guess is Boston Massachusetts USA
@@N_MY_BELOVED_IN_A_BOX this is why 24 hour time is superior. There would be no misunderstanding if someone missed the (I had to look this up but the name of the AM/PM function is called a...) period.
I got into a years-long argument with some friends over whether cereal is a soup or not. It evolved into several mini arguments including whether eating cereal without milk is a valid way to eat, and if there is such thing as a "sweet soup"
I suppose there is such a thing as "sweet soup". Not all soup is savory, after all, and it's not a requirement for soup to be savory. Since soup has to be cooked, I think cereal would only count as a soup if it was heated up. Otherwise it's just cereal. And yeah, most foods have their own categories. Lol
I fucking hate the "is cereal soup" argument and every argument similar to it. Cereal is cereal, it doesn't have to be anything else dude. It's fucking cereal, you call it ceral, I call it cereal, everyone calls it cereal SO WHY WOULD IT BE SOUP??
that's the wrong question to ask. the definition of cereal is the grain in crops like wheat or barley specifically with milk is it a soup and then go into the idea of is milk in a bowl of cereal a broth or not
back in primary school, my class once got into an argument with the relief teacher about how we should pronounce a classmate’s name. it was the whole class against the teacher. we knew how we should pronounce it because *we’ve heard him say his name before,* and i bet everyone in the class thought the teacher was just plain stupid lmao
An old friend of my older sister tried to argue with my sister about how many siblings my sister had, they literally claimed that me and my twin sister was the same person and that my older sister only had one sibling and when my sister said that she had, in fact two sisters and that they had met both of them at the SAME TIME, they just insisted that she was wrong.
One time my brother and my sisters husband had a drunken argument at 3 am over what looney tunes episode I needed to see. They spent so long arguing, only to realize at the end of it that they both wanted to show me the same episode
How many holes does a straw have?
Either one or more
It's one hole with two exits, like a donut
It should have 2. Unless you count the fact that the plastic has pores. It foes have pores don't it?
1
depends as someone could use a hole punch to increase the amount of holes in a straw
There’s almost a feeling of pure bliss whenever you’re arguing with a friend about something that neither of you care about
Or pure frustration - there's no in-between.
@@Jupiter-T That's me, I can't stand arguments, especially useless ones
I argue to prove im right. Theres no greater dopamine rush than winning an argument
Yeah…me and my friend had an argument over text about it All for One was technically the first One for All user in My Hero Academia. It was a very stupid tbh.
@@F.R.E.D.D2986 I love a good debate or two
Fun Fact: The real difference between a muffin and a cupcake isn't whether or not it has icing, but what batter is used to make them. Therefore, a muffin with icing is still a muffin, and a cupcake without icing is still a cupcake.
I agree.
It's in the name
Muffins are closer to bread, cupcakes (as the name implies) are closer to cake.
Edit to add: I meant quick breads. Not all bread has yeast.
@@transsnack muffins are closer than cake to bread because bread has yeast.
@@transsnack If you are saying as the name implies, would muffins be a product resembling muffs? 😂
I had an argument in kindergarten about which direction was left and which one was right. We were sitting on opposite sides of the table and didn't understand "my left vs your left"
Awww 😄💖
This is amazing
Cute kindergarteners
Once had an argument with a friend about whether the Coriolis Effect would curve a bullet left or right
After 15 minutes we realized we were both arguing the same side but were so bad at articulating our points that we thought we were arguing
I am imagining a hilarious situation where you were both right, or and even funnier situation where, as you were both in kindergarten, you were both wrong.
I was at school when they turned on the Large Hadron Collider for the first time. A girl told me she wasn't worried about the black hole because it was microscopic, so she wouldn't fit into it. I had the weird experience of having to concede to her that the LHC wasn't dangerous, but also that this was the wrong reason not to be worried about black holes.
But why would you be worried about falling into a hole that’s too small for you silly 😜
It'll make you fit LOL
If the LHC generated a BH, it would have a radius of something like 1 millionth the size of a proton. It would fly through the earth like a neutrino, without interacting with anything because it was so small
Not to mention, it would instantly evaporate due to Hawking Radiation
I once got in a legitimate shouting match with a friend of mine about whether death is an activity, and every so often the argument comes up again and ends up in a shouting match again.
We're both archaeologists.
genuine question-- what does your profession have to do with the argument?
@@comradewindowsill4253 That's why we were talking about death as activity in the first place: arguing over whether the presence of a corpse is proof of human activity on a prehistoric site.
@@lucyhartwell2134 Those are two very different questions. The first one is asking if death is an activity, the other one if a corpse proves human activity.
"Activity" =/= "human activity". That's an english problem. Switch you argument in latin. Activity becomes "actio", and human activity becomes "humana operatio." You guys just happen to speak english.
=
Let's start by defining our shit:
Human activity means there are humans.
An activity is something you do to get out of the house and fight boredom.
=
Second question, does a corpse proves human activity on a prehistoric site ? Yes, of course.
First question, is death an activity ? Of course not.
I mean, dying is something you can do, so...I'd say it's an activity. Laying there. Dying. It definitely eats up your schedule and doesn't leave much room for other activities does it?
It takes hours to fill all the paperwork. Dying is not something I recommend
The conclusion of that pot/pan debate was gold. Of _course_ the US military has *codified* what makes a piece of cookware a pot or a pan.
Now what about the wok...
@@SolTheIdiot They should just wok it out.
@@Soul-Burn good point, now we've got another issue. The plate and the bowl.
@@SolTheIdiotwhat’s the issue? A plate is flat and a bowl is semi sphere like
@@nightmarexgaming120 plate bowls-
"Is a frog a fish?"
obviously not, they're amphibians, but we spent the entire class period arguing anyway.
the worst thing about this though?
The two sides of the argument were the entire class vs. the teacher.
the Teacher thought a frog was a fish.
i mean phylogenically,,
,
you are a fish
If we’re gonna be _really_ pedantic about it:
If sharks and salmon are both fish, then so are frogs… and humans.
My class had almost the exact same argument except the teacher thought frogs were reptiles. He bet us a bot of donuts that he was right and researched it when he got home. He arrived next class with donuts.
HUH
@@audimc3193 Legend. He was as good as his word
a 3 hour fierce debate about pasta shapes with my italian roomate that ended with "if u call it noodles one more time I'll throw ur tamagatchi in the toilet" before they slamed their door and started blasting italian music.
sounds like an italian
Mama Mia…
Imaging this argument was particularly amazing because my first thought for “Italian Music” is always Prisencolinensinainciusol.
@@cat21860 That last part sounded like Mario and Luigi gibberish.
3:20 no
The dumbest argument I've gotten into was when i brought up that "Is the word Grinch his name, job or ethnicity?" Tweet to my brother
Anyway it got pretty heated so we asked my mom for her opinion and she just said "it's his name, his full name is Elias P. Grinch"
Then my brother left the room and i was like "wait is that really his full name???" And she said, completely stone-faced "what? No, I just made that up."
@@rayqun not falling for that one again
According to the Dr Seuss wiki, his full name is either Ethan Grinch or Ethan Who.
@@skoutburst672 "you're a mean one, Mr. Grinch" his last name is Grinch
The song says so
Actually, that's not too far from the truth. Okay, not really, but apparently Suess said at some point that his name was to be Godwin Grinch, but he shortened it as his character design developed to its more "uncouth" state. He actually did have a full name, at least at the earlier stages of his design.
Okay, in hindsight, might have had one too many Dr. Seuss documentaries on my part. Neat tidbit though.
@@thatgingerbastard9154 huh. Learn something new everyday i guess
We were in kindergarten or preschool. We both were very convinced we knew right from left and got into such a shouting match that her mom came over. Technically we were both correct--we just didn't understand that one person's right and left aren't on the same sides as the other person's _when you're facing each other._
that is strangely adorable
I just fell out of my chair after reading this, sounds like something I would do. But not only in kindergarten or preschool. I most likely still do it to this day, my brain isn't braining. ;)
My right and left
Left👈 Right👉
Omg the same argument happened to me! We were so mad that we ended up breaking up our friendship. (We were in kindergarten, when people said “I’m not going to be your friend anymore” all the time) Then a teacher came over and showed us that my right looks left to the person standing in front of me. We were confused at first, then we spun around testing how our left and right changes when it’s mirrored, and we ended up laughing because we were both stupid.
To this day i always ask "my right or your right" if it wasn't specified
FUN FACT the importance of the person does not define whether it's an assassination, it's whether or not the murder was politically motivated. only politically motivated murder can be called an assassination
You are correct. While it is usually an important person, it has to be for political or religious reasons. Also it has to be a surprise.
So what’s the line between assassination and a hate crime? Or are they just entirely separate things that often go together?
@@gomethins7738 I guess the latter
Oh, the Surprise thing
Killed me😅🤣🤣🤣🤣
- Surprise!
Three things in one; death, politics and (tada!) a... Surprise!
(i'm sorry kindereggs😅)
@@christinae30 I just really like Oxford dictionary
I once had a HEATED all-caps argument with my friend on how to spell croissant. She INSISTED it was spelled “cwossa” and/ or “cwoassant”. The argument came to a close when she got distracted by a photo of Mr. Clean someone else in the group chat sent because she thought it looked like her former math teacher.
it is cwoassant you uncultured swine
i once got into a debate with my father about what constituted a sport. he eventually ended up backing himself into a corner and claiming that war is the only sport.
LMAO WHAT
HUH
War is like the only thing that can't be a sport
All sports are a form of war simulation
AH YES, MY FAVORITE SPORT...
W
A
R
How did that even come about? what started that?
My sister and I had an hours long argument that ended in her crying over whether humans technically count as straws because of our digestive tracts. We were both already adults by that point.
I really hope you showed her the Vsauce video
As a human, I think I'm a straw
As a Heavy tank from world war 2, im pretty sure you arent a straw.
@@Trashpanda115 As a straw, I believe you qualify as 1/3 straw due to your barrel.
@@bloomingdemise Oh shit you right
The fact that matt did multiple voices makes this even more glorious.
doesn't he usually??
Baker here!!
The muffins/cupcakes debate is actually settled because cupcakes are determined by how much you mix the batter, meaning the texture after baking will be different. You can put icing on a muffin and it's still a muffin. A cupcake is also still a cupcake regardless of icing under the same rule.
Thanks for coming to my Ted talk 👋
good god, that entire argument about the pots and pans made me laugh so hard, especially "if you can't boil an egg in it, then it's not a pot, you jackass!"
It has fascinating implications for teapots, though.
I was cackling 😭😭
Ok but what if its like on og those really small egs that are like 1 inch yes those exist
Well if i cook an egg in a pat, is it in a pot or a pan?!?
@@DarkShadow32458try a pon next time
“Do mermaids have knees?”
Our robotics group never quite recovered after that one question.
they wouldn't. unless mermaids are humans who have evolved and there is remnants of a knee left over (i believe something similar can be found in some whales) then its just a tail and tails don't have knees.
its like saying a fish has knees. just sounds wrong lmao
@@allisonthefox9900 so…. same vibes as horse legs being middle fingers?
@@noodlesnookI'm sorry......What?
they might , since penguins have knees .
I don't think they would since fish don't have knees
I love the Air Force pot and pan specification so much because I love it when some serious organization has to clarify something that pedantically.
I mean there’s a like 20 page military recipe for brownies
@@EllpaFox47 WHERE I MUST HAVE IT.
@@a-mae-zing-mae8541the military probably
i dont know I've only heard of it
@@a-mae-zing-mae8541 you have to join the navy to get the brownie recipe, its how they keep their recruit numbers up
@@a-mae-zing-mae8541 If you search for MIL-C-44072C you should find it
And it's that long because it establishes shipping, defects and scientific standards for the ingredients
I love the utter contempt matt has for that argument about the dress.
The stupidest argument I have ever had is probably all the agruments I have had with my mum about whether various clothing items and blankets are green. She thinks i am colour blind, i think she is overly generous in what things are green
they're turquoise aren't they
same exact viewpoint.
Yeah people who call teal/turqoise stuff green really baffle me. Same with calling red stuff orange when it's even like, _slightly_ orange. Like thas red motherfucker
everything is green
i had ''would a tall person or a short person win a football match''
The entire debate on which fruit would win in a fight would make for a fun battle royale game. You can call it, Fruit Punch.
YES
I should develop this at one point
@@GamepadStudiosdo it
@@Mets2015WorldSeries Bet, after I'm done with what I'm currently developing rn
The next object show
Once had an entire family debate over dinner that turned into a screaming match because we couldn't figure out whether you drown or suffocate in *milk*
It only ended because the fridge just randomly spat out an ice cube and the entire table went silent. We didn't speak again for the entire meal.
You drown
If you can drown in pasta sauce you can drown in a beverage
its a liquid so you would drown
I thought drowning was a kind of suffocation.
When even the fridge is sick of your crap
Not a single one of your family members realized that "suffocate" and "drown" are synonyms when used in relation to liquids as the air-supply blockage? Suffocation is the lack of air due to obstruction, while drowning is a specific type of suffocation wherein the obstruction is liquid.
Remember: technically a straw doesn’t have any holes, because they make straws by rolling it up.
Is anything a hole? It's still on one plane, just indented slightly. And if it goes all the way through something, then it's still part of the same plane, right?
I don't know what I'm saying. Ignore me. Or start a fight, I don't care. Just know that whatever I say, I'm a dumbass, so don't take my advice seriously.
I love to imagine the two guys actually violently fighting over whether Garfield talks or thinks
He definitely thinks, whether or not he projects his thoughts on jon's mind or if jon is specifically a cat mind reader is not clear
I think the 2nd is more probable since the dog who i forgot the name doesn't respect garfield's desire, jon could not be a general mind reader cause he cannot read the mind of another humans and i think his interactions with the dog are less accurate
Definitely thinks, his text is in a thought bubble rather than a speech bubble.
Garfield thinks. Jon doesnt communicate Garfield directly like he would with a person normally, he just assumes what is Garfield thinking because of his owner-pet bonding.
In the comics, he thinks, he uses thought bubbles not speech bubbles
In the cartoons, he talks, and every character including Jon responds directly
He does either one, depending on the media
I witnessed physical threats occur at my school over whether or not horses could digest ham.
if dragons that had animus power before jerboa's spell was cast had eggs would the dragonets be animus dragons if they had the gene
@epictoast
I don’t think so. Her spell was specifically aimed at all existing animus dragons. So if they were not hatched, the spell would still apply because they existed when the spell was cast.
But they can still have the gene to pass on to future generations and new animus dragons and still hatch because she never said anything about new animus dragons.
If someone was able to get all the shards together would animus magic be restored? When jeraboa placed the spell she only said when the item is broken. So if it was put together would it be fixed? What would work to fix it? Glue, flamesilk or something else? My opinion is that it would bring back animus magic but you couldn't use a normal item like glue/tape and if you were trying to put it back together you would need an icewing gift.
they can, horses are omnivores
@@eggchomp i'm sorry, do you mean to tell me i could feed a body to a fucking *horse* and get away with it?
A friend and I got into an argument over if penguins are birds. Their argument was that, because penguins don't fly, they don't count as birds. I asked them what a penguin is if it isn't a bird, and they replied "whatever it is, it isn't a bird".
We were seniors in high school.
Wonder what your friend would think of ostriches then, lol
@@wingedspectre I'd assume that they'd think ostriches weren't birds either!
Evidently they haven't seen the BBC's Flying Penguin video then.
...Your friend should probably go back to elementary
I HAD THE SAME EXACT ARGUEMENT WITH A FRIEND A WEEK AGO AND THEY ALSO SAID "Birds aren't animals, are they?"
My partner and I once had a 3-hour long debate about the Cars universe. If they have to take off their tyres at the airport, that implies car TSA, which then implies car 9/11, car Al Quaeda, car Ronald Reagan, etc. Are aeroplanes sentient? Were the sentient aeroplanes working with Bin Laden? We ended up wasting an entire Sunday afternoon and skipped out on going to the pub.
Yes airplanes are sentient and so are ships
@@theenderdestruction2362 and so are there any wild cars in the wild?(jungle)
@@reizinhodojogo3956 idk possibly
@@reizinhodojogo3956 The tractors are used as cattle and there are Volkswagen Beetle shaped flies, so I guess it's reasonable to assume that there are some sort of a car monkey
@@Артмиш makes sense
My entire American History class got into an argument on whether Google is a source. The stupid part about it is that it spanned the length of a week.
Google doesn't tell you information, it leads you to the places that tell you information. Google isn't a source, it finds sources for you.
But... it's a search engine... that would be like citing the local library as your source instead of the books/articles you read in that library.
Or maybe even more accurately citing the index of said library
@@Jray608 I would agree
why would it be a source?
They should have googled it lol.
i remember getting into an argument with some friends in middle school over the meaning of the word "flirting".
no, i do not remember if anyone won.
I'd say every participant lost by default
Lol, what were the arguements? I feel quite invested now, I didn’t realise that it could have multiple meanings 😂
Seriously as an autistic asexual who loves complementing people and has trouble differentiating platonic and romantic connection do you have a good answer?
@@NotThisAnonymous Well, you may give the word a dictionary definition, such as "sexual behavior that suggests interest in the other person, genuine or playful", but people are still gonna disagree on what actually constitutes flirting. To some, it can be a simple "hello" or an interested look, while others would only realize that someone's flirting with them if they literally grab them by the crotch lol.
@@RealCryptoTest as someone who is also an autistic asexual, i'm afraid i do not.
I got into an argument with my sister about the hydrodynamics of a cardboard boat. It lasted an hour and ended with cardboard scraps.
One time when I was a little kid, my dad and I got into an argument over whether a bug we saw outside was a bee or a wasp. He said he would show me a picture and explain the difference and I simply responded with "I KNOW WHAT I SAW."
They look very similar tho, probably why many still call wasps "bees"
One of them is a helpful and essential part of our ecosystem. The other is spawned from hell by Satan himself
I still can’t distinguish them very well but wasps love eating meat 😅 One even bit a chunk of flesh from my dad’s arm while he was gardening 😅
Well in general, smooth bees are wasps, fuzzy wasps are bees, and if it doesn’t have wings it’s probably an ant.
And also like Kevser said, wasps are mostly carnivorous while you won’t get a bee trying to eat other insects.
@@darkstarr984 wasps also like any kind of fruit jam 😅 it’s your garden breakfast’s biggest enemy 😅
I once argued that pineapples are more dangerous then watermelons because of the spikes. My friend replied that the watermelon was more dangerous because of the mass. So we decided to take some research, we did a total of 4 tests, each test, The watermelon ended up winning, We had 5 pages of research and results. My friend won, and I gave her 2 dollars and a Snickers bar.
Edit: My friend has read your comments, and she saw how people think Durian is a good contender, so we will redo our tests, and will report back on our results.
Edit 2: Durian won, fellas
It's not much of a research grant, but it's a start
Well then.
You're not you when you're hungry
You mean a Snicker bar
@@hiitehinen NO YOU JACKASS THEY MEAN A SNICKERS BAR
I remember one time I was watching Markiplier's Until Dawn gameplay with my brother and I heard the sound of a bird flying and I said it was a pigeon (because pigeons make a 'whistling' sound when they flap their wings) but he said it was a crow and we started yelling at each other (it was 3 AM) until I went to sleep in frustration. The next day we rewatched the video and discovered it was an eagle.
ostrich
@@D415Y-x0 Ñandú
Your profile picture really adds to the story. Team pigeon all the way I guess.
I once had a huge argument with my dad as he didn't think it was possible to have a three way tie in the voting round of the weakest link.
The most heated up argument I've been in was "what was first the chicken or the egg". It happened during 2nd year of uni in the kitchen of a shared house of 4 people. It ended when everyone stormed off of the kitchen swearing and calling each other names and retreating to our respective rooms so we could cool down. We didn't talk to the guys on the otherside of the argument for a couple of weeks. 10/10
The answer is objectively the egg, there were millions of egg-laying animals millions of years before chickens even existed. If the question is wether the chicken or the egg containing a chicken specifically came first the answer would still be the egg because chickens were domesticated from the junglefowl and it would've been a semi-domesticated junglefowl that laid the first egg with a true chicken inside.
Once got asked this during some Christian trivia night I was forced to attend and according to them it was the chicken because God made all animals mature. The answer above seems like a good point too.
I think the answer will elude us forever because we have to find out how existence itself came into being to answer that.
@@LeeM22 I believe that god is real, but the bible is nonsense written by some guys to make money.
@@mamutepeq Yes exactly I have no idea how this is even still an argument like I figured this out as a child how are there still people who can't understand this very simple logic?
My Dad used to lead my local Beavers (the level before Cubscouts) group. At some point an argument developed between some of the kids and my Dad, over whether they could run faster than a kicked football. This resulted in my Dad bringing a ball, us all going outside, him kicking it, and us trying to beat it to the end of the field.
This was intended to prove his point once and for all, but became a semi-regular activity because everyone wanted another go.
I'll repeat that: some 5 to 8 year olds thought they could run faster than 60mph (the rough average speed of a kicked football), they raced against a ball doing about 65 mph, and they then kept trying this almost weekly afterwards.
Strangely enough, the football won.
Sounds like a good version of High Intensity Interval Training tbh
not the weirdest anime training arc I've heard of tbh
@twinostrich8045 so what's the secret to this new generation of record breaking sprinters in the Olympics?
"Me da made us race a footy when we were kids cos carl said he could beat it".
Fascinating! Genius!
@@EvilGremlin100 Top sprinters had to run 10 miles to school as kids.
I mean, probably. It's a surprisingly common story.
@@twinostrich8045 didn't know my parents were top sprinters..
In my freshman Spanish class, while learning about furniture, there was a legitimate argument about whether pillows were mattresses because you could sleep on them. This eventually changed to whether couch pillows were pillows or mattresses.
Ridiculous, you can sleep on the ground, but the earth doesn’t just become your giant mattress. Mattresses are bed-specific.
They're both cushions, one is for your body and the other is for specifically your head.
love how one dumb argument reaches an outrageous conclusion, that inevitably ends up starting another dumb argument lol
@@FixedKarma all cushions are pillows but not all pillows are cushions. A mattress is not a cushion
Is floor mattress then?
all of these question either involve concepts we made up and so have no correct answer, or do have a correct answer that can be easily verified within seconds
The pot / pan arguments is absolutely hilarious to me because it reminds me of an argument a streamer got into with his chat about whether or not there are actually pots in Breath of The Wild (the cooking pots are based on woks but without a handle, so they look like giant stone bowls over a campfire). The argument never went anywhere, and eventually devolved into chat and the streamer deciding that bread is soup, and it's still one of the most hilarious clips I've ever seen in my whole life.
Bread isn’t soup tho
It’s bread!
@@EllpaFox47ok SOOOO
The cube rule of food is a crude way of identifying what a food it based on starch content. Here are the classifications:
No starch: Soup
1 side: Toast
2 sides: Sandwich
3 sides: Taco
4 sides: Roll
5 sides: Bread bowl
6 sides: Calzone
2 or more layers: Cake
Filled Cube: Bread
Hope this clears things up :)
@@TheBillyBoi123 Wouldn't that make bread a calzone? because its always all bread and completely enclosed by bread on all sides? How did they come to the conclusion of soup?
@@amabeeps4646 Well, for the bread thing, I kinda forgot to mention that a filled in cube would be bread.
For the soup thing…I have no idea
Op where’s the clip
I once got into an argument in my class about which dog breed was most likely to go to furrycon. The most interesting conversation i ever had tbh
@@heroinlover9000 real cause that's literally what i picked, golden retrievers won tho
This is a certified 💀 moment
-the ceo of 💀
@@Satellit3 no, husky wins
It's gotta be husky or some kind of giant big fluffy dog
-the ceo of 💀
@@heroinlover9000 me neither, but the annoying kid said so, so since we were tired of him we just let him be
I always send these videos to my best friend when they come out. They always help her feel better and make her happy, and it's fun to talk about them a little after we've both watched them.
Thank you for continuing to brighten both of our days, Matt
💀
Matt while reading this: *SKULL EMOJIIIII*
For some reason, Matt’s videos are the only text commentary videos that actually make me laugh. The others I just watch as podcasts or something to listen to in the background while doing something, but Matt’s videos genuinely make me happy and laugh.
The grammar debate had me laughing. At least English grammar has grammar rules. Icelandic is so chaotic we make it up as we go. Be happy you have that problem.
JAI- I- 😭 BESTIEEEEEEE
Hey bestie, what's up? :) 💀
Fun Fact: GIF is the most argued over word on the internet. It stands for Graphic Interchange Format, btw
Edit: See what mean? Most argued over word
graphics, not jraphics.
giraffics lol
Hooray! I've always said it right, then!
"it's JPEG, not JPEJ!!!"
What about LASER? That’s not lasser, and SCUBA isn’t scubba
I had a year long argument with one of my friends in school if Narwhals were real or not, I ended up putting papers for the entire school to vote on: "Are Narwhal real? YES or NO" my overwhelming victory wasn't enough to convince her, nor did the natural geographic documentaries, "they could be CGI" she said "they could be costumes with two people inside, like those horse ones" she exclaimed "they could be robots like those tiny fish toys that swim in pools" she proclaimed! This was hell, WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD THEY MAKE A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT A FAKE ANIMAL!?!?
Either way after one of the longest years of my life and some of the dumbest points in the world, made by both parties, I finally convinced her. But she still gives me the death stare every time they are mentioned, I'm convinced that after 6 months she was just disagreeing with me out of pure spite.
That's kind of weird but I miss this kind of interaction of school days..
Well.. they made a documentary about mermaids
@@Twinklethefox9022 don’t you dare start this again!
@@iceran9822 they also made one on dragons
If you've ever seen "The future is Wild" you'll know they make documentaries on all sorts of crazy stuff
Had an argument that lasted for weeks with my friends about how dolphins would get around on land if they could survive out of water. I said they would log roll, one of my friends insisted they would ride scooters, and another genuinely said they would just levitate.
I'm fairly sure they can survive out of water, unless they need constant moisturisation.
The problem with most cetaceans (at least the big ones) is that they rely on being in water to support their bodies. Beach a big whale and the main cause of death will be that it was crushed by it’s own body weight. I’m not sure if this applies to “smaller” dolphins such as the bottlenose, spinner, or Commerson’s dolphin- but it does apply to the larger ones like orcas. I do think moisterization could be a factor too, but I’m not sure of that either.
I was thinking of how the hell would a dolphin riding a scooter be rational LOL but then I realized was your friend just thinking about Dr. Blowhole from the Penguins of Madagascar TV series???
Car
@@joel784you are a genius unappreciated in your own time
Once when I was a kid, I asked my mom to take a picture of me. She said yes, but on her way to get the camera, her partner at the time who I'll call Rick was like "HOW WERE YOU SO EASILY PERSUADED BY A KID!?" as though taking a couple of pictures was somehow harmful. The argument escalated to the point where Rick punched a hole in the wall, somehow taking out a light switch in the process. Meanwhile I was sitting there posing and waiting.
All the battling fruit ought to turn their wrath upon Rick...
I shall henceforth refer to him as: Pickle Rick.
Good thing he's not still around, that sounds like a dude with genuine control issues
Are you missing some details here, this doesn't make any sense
@@oldjose9110i kid you not some people genuinely act like this
r/kids are fucking stupid
For some reason the question “can a lightsaber cut through Superman?” Absolutely broke me and I haven’t laughed that hard in so long
Fun Fact:
These kinds of arguments are exactly why the Guiness Book of World Records was created
The 2 creators were having an argument about something dumb, and realized 'it would be amazing if there was a book that kept track of stuff like this'
It was actually Guinness the beer company who did this to resolve a dispute held by two men in a bar.
seriously?
@/hvtrs8%2F-wuw%2Cymuvu%60e%2Ccmm-cjalngl-UAaEcf8FvReLsrEPq%3AI%409WpC I thought it was weird the two names were the same. It just means i'm too stupid to make the connection.
Yep. @@NTVE404
Also for money.
I vaguely remember about a year or so ago I got into a heated argument with my mom about “if you bake cookies and cook bacon, why are they named that way”. I ended up yelling “why don’t I just call cookies bakies then, and bacon cookon?” and my mom left the room immediately.
It upsets me that Matt Rose didn't pin this
@@schoo9256 lmaooo don’t be that upset my guy
@@treefrog2923 it's ok gurl, I'll be fine. Someday... 🫠
@@schoo9256 gurl ??? lmao imagine being female /lh
@@treefrog2923 it's a hobby of mine when people assume I'm a guy online I assume they're a girl. Just to even things out :😜
My sister and I once got into an argument over whether or not Idaho borders Canada. We were in the car and this was before Smartphones where you could just look anything up right away. When we got back to a computer, turned out I was right, and we both laughed ourselves sick.
I guess neither of you watched Alpha and Omega as kids lol
Imagine your only knowledge of Idaho being based on Alpha and Omega, holy frick.
I guess that's why that movie was so popular in elementary school. Kids must've flipped when they found out their home-state was in a popular children's film.
EDIT: I lived in Idaho during Elementary School
@@DaNintendude I don't have to imagine lol, I'm Canadian, and I didn't even know Idaho existed until I watched Alpha and Omega. And I still don't really know anything about it other than it has a forest and borders Canada.
Who said what? Did you Idaho bordered Canada?
@@F.R.E.D.D2986 I said it did. She said it didn't. And I have no idea how we even got into that topic in the first place, LOL. We live in, and were driving through, Indiana.
3:20 it depends. Below freezing air temperatures around it, definitely no. Otherwise, bits of it will melt, making it wet.
Throughout the last few years of my secondary school two girls had a famous and genuinely passionate years long argument about whether if you cut a sandwich in half you now have two sandwiches or one sandwich in two halves. People would randomly bring up he topic when they were both in the room and enjoy the fallout
One sandwich, because the two halves form one whole
It’s kinda like breaking a cookie in half isn’t it. They’re two sandwiches but they used to make up one whole one. Either answer isn’t necessary wrong. It’s all based on your perspective.
Both are correct. On their own they are two individual sandwiches, but together make up the two halves of a greater sandwich.
This is literally the question of "glass half full" and "glass half empty."
Well if a sandwich is 2 slices of bread with something in between then that means by cutting it in half you now have two sandwiches.
My entire physics class (me included) once got into an argument about whether the shaker cheese in pizza parlors was a powder or not. It was pretty much the whole class saying it was a powder against this one very persuasive guy who said it was "shredded."
Let me tell you, I'm not lying when I say this shit got INTENSE. We were citing sources, at one point I pulled out a CHEESE PHASE DIAGRAM (don't ask), We were doing dramatic readings of rheology textbooks, someone found an article on the shear modulus of cheese types, and someone else even cited some guy on Quora named Ilgaz Soykal (yes we are all massive fucking nerds). We were arguing about this for the WHOLE CLASS (it was a substitute teacher, and the class didn't have many lectures anyway).
After class, someone ended up asking the chemistry teacher, and she said it was a powder, so tAKE THAT, DAVE.
To this day, mentioning cheese around any of those people triggers a fight-or-flight response.
You can’t hit us with the cheese phase diagram and expect us to not ask.
Props to shredded cheese guy for holding his own against you all for a whole class period
i would be on the shredded cheese guy as i've won arguments where i was wrong before
Some could argue it was shredded very finely that it became a powder
I didnt understand a single thing you said im not from english
0:32 That guy who said "Go Banana!" Is so wholesome. He motivates the banana, and doesn't care at all about anyone's counterarguement, honestly, my heart goes out to you, potterpockets.
You mean Ralph?
It's a reference to The Simpsons
read the one who said kiwis don’t fly
edit: i was talking about the name but he also spelled birds as brids
@@karnickel-s33d16 Why you gotta ruin everything in my life
I once argued about whether or not to argue. I was on the "lets-not-argue" side and I eventually won the argument, so we decided not to argue.
I think we should argue.
@@satgurs lets not go thru this.... again......
@@tjb3171 Why not? I think it's a great idea.
@@satgurs i certainly dont.
@@tjb3171 You still haven't answered my question. Why shouldn't we argue?
The most stupid argument I was ever in was when my brother had to take a urine test and he was genuinely nervous bc "he didn't study for it"
Gotta make sure your bladder has a #2 pencil on hand (ureter?).
what was the argument though 😭 what were the points made by both sides
If he failed, his parents would be pissed.
@@ParkerTheSwordsman SHUT UP AND TAKE MY LIKE
@@ParkerTheSwordsman yeah he bladder have not failed
Got into an argument with my friends about whether a bungalow was a type of house or its own separate thing
They insisted it was different even after I pulled up the definitions for 'bungalow' AND 'house'
Idc about house types, so idk
I don't even know what a bungalow is
@@genio2509 it's a one story house iirc, probably no basement either
@@comradewindowsill4253 Interesting, also I just checked and it says a Cottage can be a Bungalow, but it has some weird properties like sloppy roofs or added second stories... what
All I can say is on 3rd of middle school House type vocabulary was the only thing I had totally wrong on my quizzes and exams of English class 😅
The important question is whether the bungalow/house is a home
@@vashtic2036 Depends if it's where the heart is
my sister and dad once got into the hugest fucking argument about who got to cut the pineapple we were gonna eat, it escalated so far that my dad ended up hiding the pineapple and my sister pushed a chair over so hard it left a gash in the floor (the story ended with my dad sneaking me the whole pineapple before I left for uni again, so I actually gained something from the argument lol)
so your dad hid the pineapple and saved it as a going away present? and you were uni age when this argument happened? so many questions
🍍moment
Tried to imagine how this can escalate, I give up
🍍 moment
🍍 moment
my tutor group once had an incredibly heated argument about how many holes a straw has
2. All things are defined by what purpose they serve. A hole is what it does, so, a straw has two holes.
That frying pan argument might be the funniest thing I’ve ever seen on this platform, your narration was incredible!
I died at the pot/pan discussion 😂😂
I’d love for another video like this once again some time. Matt narrating this makes it so good.
*bloody jacuzzi for guinea pigs*
My family will get into very heated arguments about hypotheticals. Like "would you rather be able to visit 5 countries for free and stay as long as you like or know every language." Seriously, that one got us shout fighting for hours with people picking sides and vehemently defending their choice while claiming the other was the stupid choice. I have four siblings so there's a lot to fight about.
Isn't the first one the EU Scengen area?
I'd personally like to know every language. I've no interest in traveling out of my country, and knowing languages would be very useful for interacting with a ton of people, or consuming non-English media
@@wutertots1087 that's what me and my sister were thinking but our other sister fought against us
knowing every single language is a million times more useful than just getting to be a tourist for a while. you would be able to communicate fluently with literally everyone on earth
@@ketaminepoptarts That's what I'm saying!
I jokingly mentioned to some friends that I could spend an hour arguing over who would win in a fight between Mr Incredible and Darth Vader. This evolved into an actual 90 minute analysis between a few of us.
who won?
@@versatile.introvert After a LOT of arguing about what did and didn't count (we used the main Star Wars films as a guide rather than the entire Legends or Disney expanded universes), we decided that Mr. Incredible wins about 60% of the time, assuming they're fighting 1v1 in a generic urban area. To sum up the advantages each side had:
Darth Vader - Has a Lightsaber that can probably bypass Mr. Incredible's durability (this is huge). Can use Telekinesis, though note that we concluded that it'd be hard to hurt Mr. Incredible directly with this (no Force Choking for example). Has more years of training/experience.
Mr. Incredible - Has better agility and especially mobility. Despite having super strength, he is a tactical fighter who usually defaults to fighting from a distance against foes that have obvious melee advantages. Uses large objects like debris as projectiles, which can't be deflected as easily as Star Wars Blasters, and is strong enough to use projectiles larger than Darth Vader can simply brush away with telekinesis. Has fought a wider variety of foes, and thus will be more used to fighting someone like Darth Vader than vice versa. Improved mobility implies that he'll have the high ground. Does not wear a cape.
Both - Have improved perception, either due to the Force or enhanced senses. Both also wear armor/suits that provide some light protection.
@@SalnaxI’m late, but funnily enough I just watched a RUclips video about this exact argument lol. I won’t send a link Cus i don’t want you to think I’m a bot but from a channel called French baguette intelligence
Me and a close friend of mine sat next to each other in a very easy psychology course in High School, so naturally we ended up having plenty of time to talk. The arguments we ended up having were possibly the dumbest I have ever even heard of. The highlight for me has to be "What is Mario's last name?" We of course ignored his name on the wiki being "Mario Mario" and eventually concluded after literal weeks of this going on that Mario's last name is "brothers" because all of the games were called "Mario Brothers." This naturally means "Luigi Brothers" is Luigi's full name. Both of them also had the title of "Super" hence the games being called "Super Mario Brothers."
I saw some sort of quiz that asked that question on RUclips short somewhere, but the answer was “Wario” or something like that. Dunno if it’s true tho
@@SweetCandyDragon It is not.
His full name is Mario Jumpman Mario
I mean, your conclusion that their last name is Brothers is flawed, because the "Mario Brothers" in the title is not referring to Mario himself, but is more meant to be like the name of a company, since they are plumbers. And thus, the Mario in the title is the last name, making them Mario Mario and Luigi Mario.
@@frog1405 I know but having them be called the "Brothers Brothers" is godamn hillarious.
My ex and I got into a very lengthy argument whether the "round, fluffy evergreens" were pines or what. She kept insisting they weren't, nearly had an aneurysm. Turns out she just thought pines were called something else.
I would have just replied its a gymnosperm/ conifer.
This is when I bring out google lmao. I absolutely hate when people insist they're right over something they obviously know nothing about, so instead of arguing, I open google on my phone and turn the screen around so they can read the fucking definition for themselves.
@@Riva_Ridge thing is, she kept insisting they were fir trees, and both fir trees and pines are conifers.
firs look more like pines than pines do so i’m not surprised someone would confuse them
*Dropping a fun fact:*
The argument about wheter Jaffa Cakes were cakes or biscuits actually turned into a full-blown LAWSUIT against the company.
You see, biscuits are taxed more than cakes. So if they were ruled to be biscuits, McVitie's would have been found guilty of tax evasion.
The legal definition of a cake is that 12% of its batter after baking is made up of wet moisture. So Jaffa Cakes are legally considered CAKES as they have a moisture content greater than this.
Me and my friends got into an argument over wether or not it was appropriate for me to say “deez nuts” right before everyone were going to sleep, and it somehow escalated into being about Napoleon’s invasion of The Netherlands. It sounds extremely random but somehow it actually happened.
HHHHHHHHHHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHAHHH WHAT?
full story?
@@raven.petrichor I sent my friends a bunch of messages that made it appear as if I was going to say something important, but I was actually prancing them as my line of messages ended with deez nutz. These sort of pranks where quite common within our group, and some of us where getting tired of them and felt it was time for us to stop it with these pranks. Not everyone agreed however, and so we began arguing. After some time, one of the arguers said he felt like we were disrespecting and undermining him and so he asked “DO YOU ANY OF YOU IDIOTS EVEN KNOW WHAT THE NETHERLANDS WERE CALLED DURING NAPOLEONIC TIMES?!” as he feels smarter than us because of his knowledge of history. One guy googled the answer, and the guy who shouted said it was wrong. From there onwards, the heated discussion was about Napoleon, and nothing else
@@tacolordc that sounds like smth that would happen to me and my friends lmao
@@tacolordc No one disrespects the United Provinces...Unless you're Napoleon, in that case you put your brother on the throne and call it the FUCKING BATAVIAN REPUBLIC
I can see why you argued about it though, The Dutch Republics have changed names, emperors, titles and geographic position what feels like every decade for 400-500 years
I love how as soon as one person asks a ridiculous question, they both immediately take opposite sides. They want it.
my friend kept trying to sort all food items into sandwich, salad, soup, or ravioli, which escalated into a shouting match between her and the rest of our table in class about whether or not icecream is a soup. The science teacher ended up getting involved and taking down notes on our arguments because apparently it was "a legitimate, intelligent, intellectual discussion" or something lol
Edit: Ok so that you guys can duke it out in the replies, ima give you some of our main arguments.
1. The difference between a soup and a salad is the liquid to solid ratio
2. Icecream, at room temperature, is a liquid, making it a soup.
3. Icecream was not intended to be eaten at room temperature, the intention for how its meant to be consumed matters.
4. Icecream should be a salad instead because you can eat it with a fork (psychopathic but physically you can) and also toppings.
Ice cream is none of those. It's just... "frozen dairy product"
I used to let my icecream melt and then eat it. I called it chocolate soup since it was oreo icecream with chocolate sauce
I hate the cube rule so much.
Where would a steak fit into those groups?
@@ariesdragonproductions It's a frozen soup.
Had an argument with all of my siblings at once about whether an eyeball was an internal or external organ
.................dammit...
Christ this is a good one
Yanno, I've thought about it... I submit that it's internal. It exists within the eye socket.
Fingernails: eternal. They may originate under the skin, but they exist on the surface. Same with hair. Outer ears: external.
Tongue: internal, residing inside the mouth, though, like the eye, we can see it.
Eyeball: internal, within the hollow, next to the brain. The lid opens & closes like the lips & jaw. Even bulged eyes are within a socket.
Now...the nose. That gets tricky...unless we consider it like ears (inner & outer parts)...& even then...
@@echognomecal6742 my reasoning is if it needs to be kept inside you in order to keep working then it's internal. If you lost your eyelids ur eyes wouldnt be able to be moisturized and you wouldn't be able to see. Your ears and nose have internal information receptors, but they are freely exposed to the outside world.
@@mariasicree7533 I see how one could come to that conclusion. An interesting line of thinking, nice.
Let's take teeth-
If one were to lose one's cheeks & jaw, the remaining teeth would then be, essentially, external. However, that is not their natural state. Making a change to the natural state of something (their surroundings, etc) doesn't change what something fundamentally is.
There have been animals & people born with organs outside of their body, such as their heart. That doesn't change it into an external organ.
Some animals have a clear, permanent eyelid/cover. Others have a mobile lid that helps it function. If that lid is removed, that's a heck of a problem, but for an internal organ.
"...if it needs to be kept inside you in order to keep working then it's internal." Eyes do indeed need to be kept in their sockets.
No?
The stupidest argument I've ever had was on whether two lasagnas stacked on top of each other were two lasagnas or one big lasagna. I don't even remember what my stance was.
I'd say the way it came out of the oven constitutes one lasagna. Stacking two pieces does not make it one.
Although, I absolutely love the thought of tall lasagna.
Megalasagna for sure
@@cameronbigley7483Facts, you gotta bake a twice as tall lasagna to make it twice as tall
Two lasagnas, unless the bottom one is cheeseless.
You still have 1 lasagna if you stack another one on top. From an Italian girl, you're very welcome.
My science class once got into an argument of if a mouse and a fish had a baby, would it have gills, or would it have lungs
*breeds Pikachu with Magikarp* 😂😂😂
Depends on where it's born, probably. If on land, lungs; If in water, gills.
The simple answer is… that literally cannot happen.
The complex answer is… there is no correct answer, it could be either depending on how genes work out
There was an argument on my bus in high school if water was wet or if it *made* things wet. A war almost broke out and we unintentionally split ourselves across both sides of the bus
Oh and it lasted like 2 weeks
I personally was on the 'it makes things wet' - it drove most of my friends insane
I feel like it'd escalate as i would not be able to resist pointing out that we can't actually feel wetness just the temperature difference
@@knelly7132 no it’s wet. FIGHT ME
Well, it's easy: If water makes things that it touches wet, it therefore must be wet because surface tension decrees that water is always in contact with more water, therefore water is always wet.
once got into an argument in a discord server over whether it was 2 AM or 3 AM.
we were in different time zones.
This video had restored my faith in social media. I thought it was fucked. But realising that it has bought people together to allow them to argue over which fruit is superior in combat, makes it all worth it.
grapes would instantly get crushes no matter how big the gang is
imagine pineapple going mad and spinning like a buzzsaw
@@ARCHIVED9610 have you seen a durian? IT WILL KILL YOU
Who do I think would win? Definetly the gympie-gympie, an Australian plant that is notorious for its stinging hairs that can cause extreme pain and skin reactions that can last for weeks.
@@taurtura7677 I FORGOT DURIANS
@@AndersSvenson Gympie-Gympie doesn't have fruit IIRC
I once had an argument with my friend about whether or not Luigi’s Mansion should be considered a horror game
as you fucking should
If poppy playtime is considered horror, then I think Luigi’s mansion is, too
it scared me back then so it counts
Mr. Crimson I need to know what your stance was on this argument
It is as much of a horror game as Garten of Banban, which is labeled as a horror game. Therefore, yes, Luigi’s Mansion is a horror game.
Ok but the pans vs pots one is NOT about the handle count, nor solely the depth. It is very specifically the combination of the shape, depth, and usage. A wok is often as deep as a relatively average pot, but saying it is a pot is mental.
If it has straight walls large enough to contain a signifcant amount of liquid, and it is commonly used to boil things or make soups, it is most likely a pot.
Dumbest arguement ive ever been in was with my brother about an imaginary stick. We got into a first fight about whose it was. Our mom had to take the IMAGINARY stick
there sure seems to be plenty of things that parenting books can never prepare you for
me and my cousin had a similar thing happen except instead of an imaginary stick it was just a regular stick that was shoved into a bbq package. we fought over it for 3 hours in the middle of the woods. still have the stick
@@GAYBLOKE do you share custody of the stick? 1 week with them and 1 week wit you? Or is it in a common area where both of you can admire it?
@@germaxicus6670 my cousin only visits me in summer or chrostmas cause he lives really far so its mostly mine but he tried to steal it every time hes here
@@GAYBLOKE might wanna put some security for that stick before they actually do find a way to steal it...
a few days ago, we had a day at my school where everyone had to come dressed up. about eight people came together and decided they would all dress as jesus. when all of my friends saw them walk past, it devolved into a massive screaming argument about if the plural of jesus is jesuses or jesi.
Jesus is a name, so it's jesuses. Jesi just sounds silly.
Jesae
@@sylvanticxI mean, this would be wrong, since -ae is the feminine plural of 1st declension nouns in Latin, while the name Jesus is a masculine 2nd declension noun in Latin. Therefore, Jesi is technically the correct answer in Latin. In English though, I'd argue Jesuses.
@@ashwinnmyburgh9364 Jesus didn't speak Latin. He likely spoke Aramaic. I don't know Aramaic, nor do I know much about Aramaic, but best I can figure out with some googling is that Jesus would have likely pluraled himself as "Yeshe" (ישוע). In Hebrew, this would be something like Y'shu'im (I also don't speak Hebrew, but I know a little from 7 years of Hebrew school and a lot of time in synagogue) (ישועים maybe, but that looks wrong, and I've never been good at spelling in Hebrew, so maybe it's ישוים without the ayin). I'm pretty sure Jesus was supposed to be learned or something, so he might have spoken Hebrew. I don't know why I'm arguing about this, I'm not even Christian.
If -i or -s is used has nothing to with the spelling of the word, that's a "correlation does not imply causation" thing: the difference is if the word has a Greek or Latin origin. The Greeks pluralised with -i, so words with Greek origins still do, while the Latins used -s, -m, -a, or -um, which we've simplified to just the first. Also, English defaults to -s if it's from some other language, a trait we got from French.
Keep in mind it gets a bit tricky if the word started out as Greek but became a Latin word by assimilation. For example, we don't say "Phobi" because we don't say "Phobos". "Phobia" is a Latin word, so we're using a middle step. Octopus connects directly to the Greek "oktōpous", with no Latin mid-step. Thus, Octopi.
QED, "Jesus" would pluralise as Jesuses, because it is from the Latin "Iēsous".
One time in summer camp, I got into a fight with a girl because she thought she was eating a peach, when in reality, she was eating a nectarine. We argued for about fifteen minutes, and everyone I talked to during the argument said that it was a nectarine. After the argument, she tried to gaslight me into thinking that she had always thought she was eating a nectarine and we never had that argument because she never thought that.
You said that it was a peach, *Maxine*
She's probably gaslighted you the whole time
I strongly dislike people acting like that
Battle of the stonefruits: the opening volley. No one was ever quite the same after...
Maxine made a scene talking 'bout her nectarine. A peach she'd said it been, and she wouldn't just come clean, but all of us had seen, and she wasn't all that keen on thinking we'd be mean, but she'd just been a little green. Thought she was the queen, argued like a damn machine. Went on a good fifteen, almost needed some caffeine, it was honestly obscene, when I left it was serene, and we remember it *Maxine*
Aren't they the same? I thought the only difference was that peaches have the "fuzz"
Probably the BEST arguments I've ever had was about ranking commercial chocolate bars, and that's because it was a philosopher-styled collaborative debate instead of a politician-styled competitive one.
When someone presented an argument, it wasn't an attack, but an idea for us both to consider. It was so productive and engaging, I remember it fondly to this day.
Once had an argument about how long a stick had to be before it considered a branch or limb, etc. We had finally reached an understanding when someone brought up that a really small stick is a twig which started it all over again.
How many branches does a stick need before it is considered a Tree?
@@kip258tree has roots, stick or branch doesn’t
Oh wait what about logs
A branch is a piece of wood growing out of another (above ground), like a trunk or another branch.
A twig is a small branch.
A stick is a general word for a thin, roughly cylindrical wooden object or a thin piece of wood
Twig=Under a foot
Stick=Above a foot long and less than 2 fingers thick (I will use anything other than metric units)
Limb=>foot long >2 Fingers thick
I think its the thickness, not the length that determines
One time in my Geometry class, we argued for more than half of the entire 85 minutes about whether or not a student can be a teacher’s doctor.
why couldnt he?
@@scribblecloud because a student can't be a doctor due to not having a degree
@@jackofalltradeshermes they can if they're going back to school for a different subject and already have a degree in medicine.
No if they are an undergrad, yes if they already have an M.D. degree.
@@dennisdegennaro7459 'Teacher' implies high school to me. In university you do not call your professors 'teachers'.
However you can technically go back to high school and study something else. Where I come from many forms of art can be studied by adults at schools as part of a special curriculum, but still part of our secondary education system. In which case the student could be the teacher's doctor.
Debate settled?
I vividly remember arguing over which number racecar is the fastest in kindergarten. Everyone else agreed it had to be infinity, whilst I was convinced it was one.
You were absolutely correct too. Infinity would come in dead last behind an endless stampede of other cars.
I've gotten into genuine arguments that flutes should be considered brass, not woodwind. Brought them up to music majors and watching them slowly realize I was right was soul crushing.
My mother and I got into an argument about the color of a dress I owned; she kept saying it was green while I insisted it was blue. She very seriously and angrily asked “are you colorblind?!”
I once got into the same argument with my boss about a piece of clothing, and asked her the same thing. I'm just so glad i have a lighthearted boss and we could laugh about it lol
let me guess it was turqoise
Those colors between blue and green are subjectively perceived differently and men tend to see\classify them more to the one while women do to the other. But I forgot which gender does what. But yeah, had a couple of light arguments with my mom or my sister's about whether something was blue or green
@@neruwu also, in different languages the boundary between green and blue can be very different.
I did an art piece for a member of my DND group, she asked for blue skin so I used a color labelled indigo and the whole group had a fight on whether it was blue or purple
Why do I love this? Why is this my favorite form of content? Watching a bunch of internet users get in the most heated debates over open-ended, incredibly trivial subjects. I need more fruit combat. I need more pot pan differentiation. It's just indulgent stupid humorous fun I could watch for hours
What are the parameters of the fruit battle?
Ok but durian/coconut do kind of stomp everything else though fr.
Your videos genuinely brighten my day Matt.
shush wholesome
My brother and my dad often get into heated debates about game/TV characters. I sometimes participate if I have really strong feelings, but the two most memorable ones are whether Bendy from the game Bendy and the Ink Machine or Spawn would win in a fight, and the other being what the best spiderman villain was, my brother arguing for mysterio and my dad arguing for lizard and scorpion. It quickly became a yelling match for both these arguments.
Dumbest argument I’ve had: Mother and I arguing over if your spouse was always your best friend. Mom said yes, I said no. I asked my dad and my married brother who their best friends were, both said their male best friends. This led to my mom ignoring us for the rest of the day and giving my dad the cold shoulder.
Ideally yes but usually no
@@karnickel-s33d16 To be fair, people in relationships still have their own lives
@@Summerstrider Yeah I think it's healthy to have close relationships with people not related to you
all the bitter old people that post "i hate my spouse" jokes:
i think being in love with someone kind of elevates them to another level beyond "best friend," and besides, you can have multiple best friends
I had an argument with my cousin for 20 minutes about why scorpions aren't directly related to lobsters/other crustaceans. I compared my point to why nautiluses aren't related to snails because one's a cephalopod and one's a gastropod. I am 100% right, her argument was that scorpions are crusty and that must mean they're crustaceans
This is a the curse of being a biology student. I literally argued with a man over whether insects are animals.
@@nelly5954 That has nothing to do with being a biology student, you were arguing with an idio†. I'm sure he didn't think fish are animals either. What did he think insects are, carnivorous plants?
@@ivantheterrible7696 That was an extreme example, but a lot of people think taxonomy is a matter of judgement and not science. His idea of an animal was more like a vertebrate I think.
(This gets worse if you're a monophyletic purist, because then claims like "apes aren't monkeys" and "whales aren't fish" become a lot more dubious)
@@nelly5954 You have no idea how right you are. I got into an argument with my father on whether or not prawns and shrimps are a type of fish. I said they were crustaceans and therefore not fish, my father disagreed because our language calls them fish.
@@Mag_ladroth The word "fish" is just a shitshow from start to finish. The commonest scope of definition would imply sharks, trout and humans are all equally fish, but even in this case a crustacean is nothing of the sort.
The dumbest argument I ever got into was an entire class including myself arguing with a girl over the difference between a boulder and a rock. It was the story of Kronos and him eating a boulder instead of Zeus because the class was required to make a Kahoot for greek stories. My class proved to the girl that a boulder is in fact, a rock.
*Sigh* still, only partly true. For more info, GeologyHub just did a video separating the two categories.
Its actually quite simple boulder is a big chunk of stone and rock is a music genre
But how big a rock must be to be considered a boulder? An equivalent of 30 corgi?
@@Bruh-jz1se It's in the reference I put in my comment.
It's not just a boulder... it's a rock!
Everyone is now mad at me for laughing at this at the breakfast table and also my screen is now more cracked then ever.
Me and my sister once argued about who was nicer and who aliens would take if they came to earth and had been watching us.
We could hear our parents laughing at us in the other room.
Just remember: if you get into an argument about whether you are nice or not, you probably arent as nice as you think.
It's funny how women gage their worth by their likelihood of abduction.
@@MrCmon113...this is not a usual occurrence lemme just say that
@@MrCmon113W..what? How? Where? Where did this information come from?
@@MrCmon113 top 10 smartest internet comments on women
Someone tried to tell me I was wrong about my own birthdate.
I think I’d know how old I am, Jessica.
the other day, someone tried to correct me on what time it was....... over the internet.
long story short, they told me to touch grass, i said "no it's 6:30 am". they said "no it's 8:30" and laughed at me for "not even knowing the right time". i said "bro forgot abt time zones" in chat and they said, all smartass-like, "well, if you live in australia, it's 8:30"...... CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING! *I DONT FUCKING LIVE IN AUSTRALIA LMAO*
plus we all have a clock on our internet-accessing device of choice....... i can just look at what time it is...
@@blizzard_the_seal9863 you live in 1/57 places. My guess is america but it could also be. Basse-Terre (Guadeloupe) Basseterre (St. Kitts) Québec Augusta Asuncion Providence Hartford Boston and maybe Blanc-Sablon. However these are just a few options.
@@N_MY_BELOVED_IN_A_BOXin no world would someone in america have only a 2 hour difference with Australia
@@thatdamncrow9197 Correct! However quick correction FOURTEEN hour difference. You didnt account for AM and PM. In australia it was 6:30 _AM_ and in america it was 8:30 _PM_ . Like I said 14 hour difference also
"Canberra ACT, Australia is 14 hours ahead of Washington, DC, USA"
So my final guess is this guy lives in the us. My EXACT guess is Boston Massachusetts USA
@@N_MY_BELOVED_IN_A_BOX this is why 24 hour time is superior. There would be no misunderstanding if someone missed the (I had to look this up but the name of the AM/PM function is called a...) period.
I got into a years-long argument with some friends over whether cereal is a soup or not. It evolved into several mini arguments including whether eating cereal without milk is a valid way to eat, and if there is such thing as a "sweet soup"
I suppose there is such a thing as "sweet soup". Not all soup is savory, after all, and it's not a requirement for soup to be savory. Since soup has to be cooked, I think cereal would only count as a soup if it was heated up. Otherwise it's just cereal. And yeah, most foods have their own categories. Lol
I fucking hate the "is cereal soup" argument and every argument similar to it. Cereal is cereal, it doesn't have to be anything else dude. It's fucking cereal, you call it ceral, I call it cereal, everyone calls it cereal SO WHY WOULD IT BE SOUP??
In Hungary, there is a type of cherry soup that's served for dessert, known as "meggyleves" (roughly "meddge-leh-vesh")
that's the wrong question to ask.
the definition of cereal is the grain in crops like wheat or barley
specifically with milk is it a soup and then go into the idea of is milk in a bowl of cereal a broth or not
@@kiiturii soup
Me and my mates once had an argument about what colour Shaggy from Scooby-Doo's hair was
I would listen to Matt narrate reddit arguments all day
back in primary school, my class once got into an argument with the relief teacher about how we should pronounce a classmate’s name. it was the whole class against the teacher. we knew how we should pronounce it because *we’ve heard him say his name before,* and i bet everyone in the class thought the teacher was just plain stupid lmao
The exact same thing happened in my fifth grade class with the substitute teacher lmao.
A friend of mine once got into an argument over how to say his own name.
He lost.
Was his name A-Aron?
@@heyoyo10gaming4unfortunately not
@@clairemmiiler2656 i had a deaf sub that kept calling me Stef instead of seth.
An old friend of my older sister tried to argue with my sister about how many siblings my sister had, they literally claimed that me and my twin sister was the same person and that my older sister only had one sibling and when my sister said that she had, in fact two sisters and that they had met both of them at the SAME TIME, they just insisted that she was wrong.
One time my brother and my sisters husband had a drunken argument at 3 am over what looney tunes episode I needed to see. They spent so long arguing, only to realize at the end of it that they both wanted to show me the same episode