I used to own a Pearl White 2004 Murano SL which I absolutely loved. Good power, beautiful styling, roomy and extremely comfortable interior. There's no visceral attraction for me with this new design like I had when I first saw the SUV in 2004. I wish Nissan well.....this new one is a pass.
Probably because of no CVT, we got a little bit less efficient yet more fun to drive a torque converter 9 speed automatic transmission, which might be a good thing
@@koven1497 yes. The VC turbo machine is more fuel efficient, but the 9 speed automatic transmission is less fuel efficient. So we get more or less balanced results at the end. That is my two cents
![NLE Choppa - Or What ft. 41 (Orchestra Mix) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/biOFASEgSOM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Digital Circus Episode 4 [TRAILER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/abZtsmMUbJo/mqdefault.jpg)
Who hurt Nissans feelings? This looks GREAT!!
Looks great! I am looking for a car with smoothness (WITHOUT A CVT) and this car fits perfectly!
I think it looks GREAT. Strange that it's not the new Infiniti QX-65.
The next gen Infiniti QX50 or the upcoming QX65 will probably be based on this
General shape reminds me of the Venza
IT’S ACTUALLY NOT THAT BAD✨✨🌟
Way better than any honda or acura
Greetings from southern Ontario Canada I'm disappointed that there's no hybrid or phev option
I just wish the platinum edition had the trip zone heat and air for the rear seat passengers
I used to own a Pearl White 2004 Murano SL which I absolutely loved. Good power, beautiful styling, roomy and extremely comfortable interior. There's no visceral attraction for me with this new design like I had when I first saw the SUV in 2004. I wish Nissan well.....this new one is a pass.
The inside has gone Ariya in my opinion 🤣
It rides on the same platform as the previous model so not all new.
Where did you read or see that?
I HATE the front end...the rest of it is nice though
I find it a bit ironic that they did all this work for aerodynamic efficiency and the economy is still bad.
Probably because of no CVT, we got a little bit less efficient yet more fun to drive a torque converter 9 speed automatic transmission, which might be a good thing
@ More reliable, which is always a plus, but I thought their variable compression was economic.
@@koven1497 yes. The VC turbo machine is more fuel efficient, but the 9 speed automatic transmission is less fuel efficient. So we get more or less balanced results at the end. That is my two cents
Always Nissan, no quality difference Infiniti should go bye bye
Is Nissan even trying these days? Heavily refreshing current models, after ten years, isn’t the route to go. It’s cheap and lazy.
It's not a heavy refresh. This is a brand new generation of the Murano
I don't care what they brand it. It's hideous.
It Actually Not That Bad
I like it
That's why design is subjective
2008 Versa looks better