Does New York man own missing Michelangelo artwork?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- An upstate New York man believes he owns a missing 500-year-old masterpiece. Marty Kober is trying to prove the artwork was painted by Rennaissance artist Michelangelo. If Kober is correct, the painting could be worth millions. Don Dahler reports.
Subscribe to the "CBS This Morning" Channel HERE: bit.ly/1Q0v2hE
Watch "CBS This Morning" HERE: bit.ly/1T88yAR
Watch the latest installment of "Note to Self," only on "CBS This Morning," HERE: cbsn.ws/1Sh8XlB
Follow "CBS This Morning" on Instagram HERE: bit.ly/1Q7NGnY
Like "CBS This Morning" on Facebook HERE: on. 1LhtdvI
Follow "CBS This Morning" on Twitter HERE: bit.ly/1Xj5W3p
Follow "CBS This Morning" on Google+ HERE: bit.ly/1SIM4I8
Get the latest news and best in original reporting from CBS News delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to newsletters HERE: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! bit.ly/1OQA29B
---
Delivered by Charlie Rose, Norah O’Donnell and Gayle King, "CBS This Morning" offers a thoughtful, substantive and insightful source of news and information to a daily audience of 3 million viewers. The Emmy Award-winning broadcast presents a mix of daily news, coverage of developing stories of national and global significance, and interviews with leading figures in politics, business and entertainment. Check local listings for "CBS This Morning" broadcast times.
He needs to watch/contact BBC ...they have an excellent series titled "Fakes or Fortunes". They do incredible amount of research by scientific methods and for provenance, etc. Almost no one in the USA (professionals) will be very reluctant to confer or authenticate paintings these days due to the amount of fakes they've (galleries & museums) been stuck with in the past. Hope this helps.
Love Fake or Fortune. Philip Mould
would find out if its fake or not.
No. Definitely not!
Nothing about it is good enough.
All you need to do is look at the technical mastery of the Doni Tondo in Florence and the unfinished Deposition in the National Gallery, London to know that Michelangelo could not POSSIBLY have painted this work.
There's no way that's genuine.
The Virgin Mother's face is awfully amateurish. The use of tempera medium for a late work of his where everyone else already adopted oil is questionable. Compared to the Sistine Chapel, the modeling of the nude is rather wonky. It's even a "magnificent copy".
Ah, an expert!
The face of Mary doesn’t look right.
Lmao you do realize this has gone through restoration right?
That is not a Michelangelo .
Look the hands for example.
It is a Michelangelo and it has been proved in Italy.
"The greatest painting of all time, the greatest artist of all time". Theses statements should be conditionalized for one can add many paintings and artists to this categories. Also he didn't have to go to Italy to get the painting restored, he could have stay right in the USA and gone to Baumgratner in Chicago one of the best preservationist there is and right in his own "back yard".
It’s horrible and if it is legit it’s been absolutely buggered by some terrible conservation.
BS--it is about the money..
Michaelangelo refered to himself a a sculptor never a painter. For him to give a painting oil on wood to a friend is already suspect.
If you would bother to actually read and know the history behind it, before making uninformed comments here, you will be very surprised. So much information and forensics were done that were left off here this small edited clip. In fact a 40 min documentary was done in a three part series about it, and because people would rather watch duck dynasty instead of real history shows, it was never picked up in the US. It is about who you know and who is marketing you in the Art world, rather than real forensics, which all point in that conclusion.
It does not appear to be the quality which one would expect from a Michelangelo. It could be from a slightly later period, or from a follower, or in the style of. It needs to be cleaned, and afterwords,
the cleaned painting may provide further clues to its origin.
It is an old master in my opinion however I do not think it is by Michelangelo unfortunately:(
Nice Try...
What's so great about it just because Micheal Angelo did it.
It is painted on wood... All you need to know
Please, give it up.
He should ask Philip Mould for help. Or Antique Roadshow.
LISTEN this is NOT MICHELANGELO!!!!!!! could be from his circle of apprentices... but ONE FACT is the stomach is ALL WRONG the Oblique and abs the muscles!! also this artist used angles..... LEO"S paints and has a rounded stroke when he paints fingers their roundish.. dont see it at all in this painting , to me jesus looks flat its not awe dropping.. !!!!!THIS DUDE JUST WANTS THE MONEY!!!!!!.... can u blame him
It does not match the way Michelangelo painted the body nor his use of color and tonal gradations being a
painting major, I do not believe it demonstrates the quality of his style.
For some reason the Michelangelo chalk this is based on was never brought up, maybe because comparing them would be obvious. the chalk is in Boston, so it makes me think it was even done on this side of the pond. Its Pietà for Vittoria Colonna
and has its own wikipedia page, and discusses this copy. I think the face of Mary is lifted from something else, its very Caravaggio, like the boy with the lizard or Medusa, not Michelangelo.
Michelangelo would not have painted it because he didn't even want to do the Sistine Chapel. This painting is not his for the simple reason that it doesn't take your breath away. Period.
Not even close!!
Looks nothing like Michelangelo's paintings.
Not so by just viewing it here on RUclips. It doesn't look like the work the master.
No.
Looks like a copy or from a workshop. I don’t see it being by the master himself.
Noooooo...lol
Copies after drawings
were made in the renaissance and barock time like ice cream in summer.
Please go to Rom/Florenz :D
Pentimenti is in my opinion a bad try to say
it must be original.
The Experts here in germany would say mhh it’s good but no master, 2/3.000 Limit in auction...
and this guy think he get 300.000.000 WTF..
After looking at more than several paintings from Michelangelo, you look for similarities that could point to the painter, the dressing of the Mary, period painting, you see a formula of dress he used for his most famous paintings, and then for his individual paintings, where he had more time or less to accomplish, i.e. a ceiling! He gets less detailed but still beautiful. The flowing gowns and tara's, tunics, are all flowing and NEVER with a string to bind the gown, which we see here, I looked through everything I could find, and not one lady, not one had even close to what she is wearing. The next is the facial expression, Sorry, the master was just a better painter than what is depicted here. The next one is the abs on the Christ, while this is closer to being "close" it is still not definitive because it is very 50/50. Looking that Sistine chapel, you will see what I am talking about, and little angels are about the ONLY THING that even comes close to his style. So, my viewpoint, this is definitely not one of his, and I agree, it is probably a student of his or someone interpreting his style. I will note that later in life, Michelangelo did paint ladies with more girth and more masculine features, which he got flack for but who is famous now? Not the critics lol:)
Billions & Billions
It's obviously an early Norman Rockwell, sized to fit on the cover of the Saturday Evening Post.
way to stylized.. unless there is some kind of varnish layer over top hiding it..
Nice try 1:25
That doesn't look good.
Its a fake!!!
This doesn’t look legit
The impression you get doesn’t leave you ecstatic. The face of Mary is not a face you want the Virgin Mary to have. The face of Jesus is not jesus’
Fake as Drake