Nucleation

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 мар 2018
  • Nucleation
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 96

  • @bina5580
    @bina5580 5 лет назад +105

    A million appreciation from South Korea. You have saved my day ! So catchy and enjoyable explanations !

  • @rajibdas1087
    @rajibdas1087 5 лет назад +22

    Sir , ur way of teaching is superb. U have made this subject so interesting.

  • @SujoyShivde
    @SujoyShivde 4 года назад +8

    This was beautiful. Wish we were taught like this the first time round.

  • @vincemaz
    @vincemaz 4 года назад +23

    Sir i am a Msc student in Tu Delft (Netherlands) and your videos help me a lot for many different courses. Thank you verymuch i love the way you make concepts easy to understand

  • @dr.m.dhavamurthy4599
    @dr.m.dhavamurthy4599 5 лет назад +36

    sir, such an amazing lecture; I really impressed by your way of presentation. It was too difficult to understand when I was doing Ph.D. Now it is given a great impact to enhance my skill in the research field. Thank you very much for your great lecture.

    • @suriyaprakash8663
      @suriyaprakash8663 3 года назад

      Sir what is the scope of phd in materials in india?

  • @hariprasadvp4866
    @hariprasadvp4866 4 года назад +2

    A huge thanks and gratitude!

  • @pgseries
    @pgseries 3 года назад +1

    Thank you Prof. Rajesh Prasad, highly appreciate, your lecture help me understanding nucleation thermodynamically.

  • @kishoresadasivan5329
    @kishoresadasivan5329 3 года назад +3

    Soft words filled with knowledge.
    dear Sir.thanks.

  • @user-lo6fg9ym7r
    @user-lo6fg9ym7r 6 месяцев назад +1

    splendid lecture sir

  • @smarajitpunaykanti6463
    @smarajitpunaykanti6463 2 года назад

    Your teaching reminds me of my private college days . It sucks . Thanks Prof .🙏

  • @dimbanimvula3672
    @dimbanimvula3672 4 месяца назад

    U are the best teacher ever for material science

  • @minason2823
    @minason2823 4 года назад +4

    Sir, I have one quick question. Why is γ(gamma) always positive? Is it because we use/need energy to create that solid-liquid interface?

  • @sandeeprajbhar1919
    @sandeeprajbhar1919 5 лет назад +3

    thanks sir! for providing such a great lecture

  • @dharmendersinghrana5652
    @dharmendersinghrana5652 2 года назад

    Impressive presentation. Thank you Sir

  • @messimagic2527
    @messimagic2527 3 года назад +3

    Respected sir, how does viscosity affect the nucleation rate in pure metal?

  • @thangabharathi.t9720
    @thangabharathi.t9720 3 года назад

    Sir, How this is possible for a cylindrical nuclei? It involves critical height and critical radius.

  • @suriyaprakash8663
    @suriyaprakash8663 3 года назад

    Sir what is the significance of r* ? Does r* say anything about phase transformation time or grain size

  • @kasinfo509
    @kasinfo509 3 года назад

    Thank you so much sir. clear and detail lecturing.

  • @limon5312
    @limon5312 3 года назад

    Love from
    Dpt of MSE,Ruet..😷

  • @mosstaqueahamed8289
    @mosstaqueahamed8289 3 года назад +1

    Very fruitful lecture sir.

  • @motiontv3621
    @motiontv3621 3 года назад

    Can I get summer internship in IIT Delhi as I'm from NIT Rourkela.

  • @your_name_here2158
    @your_name_here2158 4 года назад +2

    The lower the temperature of solidification the smaller the critical r.

  • @numankashif6158
    @numankashif6158 Год назад

    Can anyone tell me it mean we have to give energy to make critical size radius and what type of energy is given

  • @mdnazmulhuda5647
    @mdnazmulhuda5647 2 года назад

    Just Amazing.

  • @beena3353
    @beena3353 Год назад

    Best lecture I have seen so far

  • @ThatOneGuy0631
    @ThatOneGuy0631 2 года назад +1

    Thank you for this explanation.

  • @hanikorek5567
    @hanikorek5567 4 года назад +3

    amazing ! i think a school student would understand such lecture..
    i lost my time yesterday trying to understand these concepts during my PhD study
    this video illustrates everything and answers all of my questions.
    ThankYou!

  • @nagasai4328
    @nagasai4328 4 года назад +5

    Why does a ball of critical radius form in first place since its delta Gf is positive?
    Why is critical radius not when delta Gf = 0 but when it is maximum?

    • @introductiontomaterialsscience
      @introductiontomaterialsscience  4 года назад +3

      You have asked a very serious and interesting question. In fact, in this regigon thermodynamics breaks down!! The formation of nuclei can only be explained by statistical fluctuations of atoms which is beyond thermodynamics :-( We are essentially cheating by applying thermodynamics such small systems.

    • @panchananmajee7465
      @panchananmajee7465 3 года назад

      @@introductiontomaterialsscience Does the result by applying thermodynamics satisfy the result of statistical fluctuations of atom?

  • @Abhijeetkumar314
    @Abhijeetkumar314 4 года назад

    super ❤️️

  • @ibrahimyldrm2427
    @ibrahimyldrm2427 4 года назад

    absolutely sensational

  • @hamza_ME_
    @hamza_ME_ 4 года назад

    AMAZING AMAZING AMAZING...

  • @evansmichelo883
    @evansmichelo883 2 года назад

    During the calculation of critical radius, is the temperature supposed to be all converted to kelvins?

  • @prashantss8899
    @prashantss8899 3 года назад +4

    sir if radius is just above r* still the term is positive then how does the nucleation start

  • @monishreddy1797
    @monishreddy1797 3 года назад +1

    Sir..earlier in the lecture you said if del(G) is negative then the reaction is feasible/spontaneous...but at 19:38 we are seeing if del(G) is increasing or decreasing..that is we are seeing if del(del(G)) is positive or negative..why are we considering that..also at r* del(G) is positive..so reaction should not be spontaneous..shouldn't we be considering the point where del(G) becomes zero..that is the x-intercept of curve..please correct me if iam wrong

  • @masoudfaraj3647
    @masoudfaraj3647 3 года назад

    why a proeutectoid phase (ferrite or cementite) forms along austenite
    grain boundaries

    • @rajeshprasadlectures
      @rajeshprasadlectures 3 года назад +3

      This is what is termed as heterogeneous nucleation. If the ferrite nucleus forms inside the austenite grain (homogeneous nucleation) then only new ferrite/austenite interfaces form. This happens also in heterogeneous nucleation of ferrite on austenite/austenite grain boundaries. But in this case original austenite/austenite grain boundaries disappear. This leads to a release in energy making the heterogeneous nucleation favourable.

  • @punitkumarsoni7092
    @punitkumarsoni7092 5 лет назад +3

    👌👌👌👌👌

  • @shashwatchaurasia2693
    @shashwatchaurasia2693 2 года назад +1

    love from India

  • @BadalKumar-ee9xh
    @BadalKumar-ee9xh 11 месяцев назад

    Good Evening Sir ,
    Sir at 29:39 you told Driving force is inversely proportional to Radius, but will the negative sign will not influence the result

    • @introductiontomaterialsscience
      @introductiontomaterialsscience  11 месяцев назад

      The negative sign in the expression of radius makes it positive because the denominator (Gs-GL) is negative.

  • @joshebramjoseph2954
    @joshebramjoseph2954 Месяц назад

    how can liquid exist below its freezing temperature i mean by that time everything would have been converted solid itself right how will nucleation occur below Tm as what i understood was freezing will occur till complete liquid changes to solid and until then T will remain constant at Tm

    • @introductiontomaterialsscience
      @introductiontomaterialsscience  Месяц назад

      What you are stating is the condition of equilibrium solidification where the entire solidification can happen at the melting point. But this requires an extremely slow cooling. If you cool rapidly it is possible to retain liquid, for some time, in metastable state below the meting point before it starts freezing.

  • @openargument5285
    @openargument5285 4 года назад

    Sir we are converting liquid to solid, so solid is product and in free energy expression, should it be GL - Gs?

  • @simonghostriley88
    @simonghostriley88 4 года назад +3

    Sir, in the previous lecture you said undercooling is Tm - T and in this lecture you wrote undercooling is T - Tm. Is it wrong or both these have same undercooling values ?

    • @hariprasath2529
      @hariprasath2529 4 года назад

      Tm-T is correct check It in textbook

    • @ayush7805
      @ayush7805 4 года назад +1

      yeah, he made a silly mistake in this video. It was correct in the previous one.
      He rarely makes mistakes

    • @deepkalariya6906
      @deepkalariya6906 2 года назад +1

      It's for signing purpose T - Tm

    • @d225mohdahsan8
      @d225mohdahsan8 2 года назад

      @@ayush7805 he didn't made silly mistake
      Make sure uh r perfect 😂😂😂😂

  • @keraroberts3610
    @keraroberts3610 3 года назад

    Life saver

  • @pailasaisravan5423
    @pailasaisravan5423 4 года назад

    sir at 19.26 , why it is not thermodynamically favourible situation ?? and as r less than r* you said thermodynamically growth is not possible and i would like to know the reason from that point of view

  • @aniketsaw6049
    @aniketsaw6049 3 года назад

    Sir in previous lecture you told dT= (Tm- T ). But in this lecture at last you write dT = (T-Tm) why ??

    • @rajeshprasadlectures
      @rajeshprasadlectures 3 года назад

      Sorry for the confusion. You can define it in either way. But one has to take care of the sign. So below the melting point, T

    • @aniketsaw6049
      @aniketsaw6049 3 года назад

      @@rajeshprasadlectures thank you so much sir 🙏

  • @rajulinga6298
    @rajulinga6298 3 года назад

    Sir, what is mean by undercooling?

    • @rajulinga6298
      @rajulinga6298 3 года назад

      I mean what is mean undercooled liquid?

    • @introductiontomaterialsscience
      @introductiontomaterialsscience  3 года назад +1

      @@rajulinga6298 If a liquid remains as liquid below its equilibrium freezing point it is called an undercooled liquid.

  • @priyanshusinha1209
    @priyanshusinha1209 4 года назад

    Sir does nucleation will take place if r=r*??

    • @rajeshprasad101
      @rajeshprasad101 4 года назад +4

      Well, the situation of r=r* is critical, that's why it is called the critical radius. If a few atoms join the particle with r=r* it will grow. If few atoms leave it then it will dissolve. So it is in unstable equilibrium.

    • @priyanshusinha1209
      @priyanshusinha1209 4 года назад

      @@rajeshprasad101 Thank u so much sir..

    • @rajeshprasad101
      @rajeshprasad101 4 года назад +1

      @@priyanshusinha1209 I just edited metastable to unstable in my answer.

  • @shradhajuneja876
    @shradhajuneja876 7 месяцев назад

    Thankyou so much sir

  • @mech-www7563
    @mech-www7563 5 лет назад +1

    sir how to start nucleation????

    • @nainamkapil3911
      @nainamkapil3911 4 года назад +3

      when temperature is less than Tm certain number of atoms assemble together to form solid mass of radius = critical radius, nucleus form.

  • @ahsansaeed4823
    @ahsansaeed4823 4 года назад

    thnx sir

  • @sampathvinay2920
    @sampathvinay2920 Год назад

    If u know telugu , then like ❤️ you made the material science subject easy

  • @shashwatchaurasia2693
    @shashwatchaurasia2693 2 года назад +1

    watch at 1.25x

  • @NITian_Shourya
    @NITian_Shourya 7 месяцев назад

    5:33 😮

  • @pathlavathganesh5055
    @pathlavathganesh5055 5 лет назад

    sir,what is r* here?

    • @pathlavathganesh5055
      @pathlavathganesh5055 5 лет назад

      How to find it?

    • @nikhilakalia9692
      @nikhilakalia9692 4 года назад

      r* is the critical radius of the spherical surface which is needed for nucleation

    • @nainamkapil3911
      @nainamkapil3911 4 года назад

      @@pathlavathganesh5055 r*= -2γ/[Gs-Gl] he has derived this expression.

  • @harshpatelhp9439
    @harshpatelhp9439 3 года назад

    Sir please explain in hindi for..... Weak student

  • @dimbanimvula3672
    @dimbanimvula3672 4 месяца назад +1

    U are the best teacher ever for material science