Garmin R50 vs Uneekor Eye Mini Lite | Which one wins?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 янв 2025

Комментарии • 13

  • @John-ei5uz
    @John-ei5uz 6 часов назад

    The only ball data that needs to be accurate is Ball Speed, Launch angle, Launch direction, Backspin, and Spin axis. If these are the same with both units then carry distance and roll out are purely an algorithm issue that can be easily adjusted. I don't know why all launch monitor brands don't offer a settings menu that lets you choose how far the ball goes based on those numbers. The device can have its base distance and horizontal ball curve calculated from the data that can be adjusted by the user as a percentage of the basic data. Then all ball carry distance and ball curve cause by the basic data is up to what the user seems is good for him or actually accurate compared to other device data. This has to possible to do! If the basic ball speed, launch angle and spin data between different devices is not consistently the same then one or both of the devices has some potentially unsolvable issues and probably isn't worth spending money on.

  • @william_hartman
    @william_hartman Месяц назад +2

    Interesting that the ball speed are so similar but the club speeds are so different.

  • @LH-my4th
    @LH-my4th 4 дня назад +1

    When making comparison, would it not make sense to know the perfect way to setup the product,by getting this information from the manufacturer,and would take the guessing out of it, 😔 😉😔😉

  • @AdamAirline
    @AdamAirline 28 дней назад +1

    I don’t have a place for a screen or a projector. So Garmin all day for me. Plug into a $250 TCL tv and done. Simple setup.

  • @Evan_Rodgers
    @Evan_Rodgers 29 дней назад +1

    The Eye Mini/lite has had some pretty apparent spin axis and other measurement reading issues since launch. I’d avoid the brand. There’s also a reason why no other YT channel was able to test side by side; the infrared cameras on both units screws up readings for one or both devices.

    • @golfbaysofficial
      @golfbaysofficial  29 дней назад +1

      Whenever we have used the units in isolation they have been very impressive. Then with the software that Uneekor offer including AI updates and swing cameras you can have an incredible professional setup for a fraction of TM and foresight costs 👀

  • @mpkelley20
    @mpkelley20 29 дней назад

    Club data has no impact on the ball flight and numbers so I’ll just say the two sets of stickers and angles made those useless. Other than that, the garmin gave some weird numbers at times and the differences between the two on carry were a bit further apart than I’d expect. I think garmin needs to look at how they use spin and their algos.

  • @rodmarshallpga4571
    @rodmarshallpga4571 Месяц назад +2

    Having two stickers on the club will give you false readings for club speed.

    • @golfbaysofficial
      @golfbaysofficial  29 дней назад

      Unfortunately it was the only way to get both units to read club data. Was worth a go though

  • @leonvalentine3077
    @leonvalentine3077 Месяц назад +1

    I like the idea of the review ! But both these units need to be set up bang on and tested against a trackman for a fair test. I’d love to see this happen ! The misalignment and the added club stickers in the wrong locations for each monitor, will give inaccurate readings. Hope to see them both up against a trackman or even the pro tee VX

    • @golfbaysofficial
      @golfbaysofficial  Месяц назад

      We have Trackman 4 and ProTee VX so keep your eyes peeled

    • @Evan_Rodgers
      @Evan_Rodgers 29 дней назад +1

      Trackman, and all radar LMs, are less accurate than camera LMs indoors.

  • @saythavisone3686
    @saythavisone3686 Месяц назад +2

    Uneekor all day!