The World's Best Bombers Today (2021) | Aircraft Ranking

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 июн 2024
  • Ranking all 7 of the operational bomber aircraft in 2021. Utilizing my unique aircraft ranking system that fairly evaluates aircraft of any type and generation.
    If you enjoy this content and want to support the channel please consider becoming a Patron.
    / aviationaustin
    GIVEAWAYS!
    Join Robinhood and we'll both get a FREE stock. Sign up with my link.
    join.robinhood.com/austins1684
    Get two FREE stocks worth anywhere from $12-$1400 just for signing up for Webull here and buying any stock!
    act.webull.com/promotion/invi...
    The account is 100% free stock trading plus it will also help me get free stocks if you use this link! The first stock comes when you sign up and is worth anywhere from $2.5-$250. The second comes when you deposit any amount of money into your account! Even if you don't use my code, you get a free stock just for signing up and depositing any amount of money into the account. Thanks!
    Footage Referenced:
    All military aircraft footage courtesy The Department of Defense www.dvidshub.net/
    Spacecraft Footage courtesy of NASA: images.nasa.gov/
    Follow me on
    instagram - @aviationaustin
    twitter - @aviationaustin
    facebook - Aviation Austin
    Tiktok- @aviationaustin
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 32

  • @steezy853
    @steezy853 3 года назад +3

    It would be cool to see a ranking on air superiority aircraft.

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  3 года назад +1

      I did a US fighter jet ranking already. If you wanna check that out

  • @AviationAustin
    @AviationAustin  3 года назад +3

    New Chinese fighter jets ranking is now live. ruclips.net/video/hIxtudj3zUw/видео.html
    Do you agree with my ranking? Let me know your thoughts. Make sure you check out my other ranking videos as well!

    • @chrisriley1450
      @chrisriley1450 3 года назад +1

      What about the SU-24M? It is NATO designated as a bomber, or are you only looking at long range bombers?

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  3 года назад

      @@chrisriley1450 I'm not looking at any attack aircraft. It just opens it up too much. So yes, only strategic bomber aircraft.

  • @germanramirez7542
    @germanramirez7542 Год назад +1

    Great video!

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  Год назад

      Thank you! Feel free to check out all of my ranking videos for more like this one!

  • @dylankorengold6060
    @dylankorengold6060 3 года назад +4

    Nice video! Do you work as an aerospace engineer?

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  3 года назад +2

      Yes I do currently work as an Aerospace Engineer in the industry.

  • @Wildkat-1
    @Wildkat-1 Год назад +2

    The B-2 is unstoppable, because it's undetectable ....I'll take the B-2 and win the game !

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  Год назад

      Hard to beat. Have you seen my stealth explained video?

  • @fahimsami321
    @fahimsami321 Год назад +1

    We want a video with tu 160

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  Год назад

      You want a whole video dedicated to it?

    • @fahimsami321
      @fahimsami321 Год назад

      @@AviationAustin yes

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  Год назад

      Not sure I know enough about it. I'd have to do a lot of research

    • @fahimsami321
      @fahimsami321 Год назад

      @@AviationAustin But it's cool

  • @nakdad
    @nakdad Год назад

    Add on B-21

  • @johngohl
    @johngohl 3 года назад +1

    Are you brazilian?

  • @henrygibson9613
    @henrygibson9613 Год назад +1

    With the US bombers range doesn't matter because of the USA's huge air tanker fleet and number of global bases. I also disagree with the B 52 placing as i feel it should be higher as it is due to be in service longer than the b2 and B1,, both supposed replacements. the b1 also should beat the tu160 in my view as it is stealthier and can carry a payload which is far far more diverse. Just my opinion obviously and a very interesting video.

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  Год назад +2

      I do think a big factor in it's continued use is our involvement with far inferior forces. A B-52 would be a sitting duck for any even semi sophisticated air defense systems.

    • @henrygibson9613
      @henrygibson9613 Год назад +1

      @@AviationAustin maybe so, the pilots often train to fly under the radar though (100ft) and with long range cruise missiles I feel the 70 year old plan is still relevant, its a really good debate though with the B21 entering service relatively soon.

    • @AviationAustin
      @AviationAustin  Год назад +1

      @@henrygibson9613 it will be very interesting to learn the B-21s capabilities

    • @kirganthexder6582
      @kirganthexder6582 Год назад +1

      Tu-160 is the best, it's the fastest, have long range ang can carry 12 Kh-101 stealth missiles, which have 5000km(not a typo!) range.

    • @coolsquad7428
      @coolsquad7428 6 месяцев назад

      @@AviationAustin you did forget that the b1 lancer has some stealth capabilities like lower rcs as low as the f16C which is 1.25 rcs and also the b1 lancer have a external payload of 50,000lbs on top of thee 75,000lbs internally which makes it the most payload of any bomber in the current fleet and the B2 spirit bomber max payload of 55,000lbs sense it can carry 2 GBU 57 bombs but typically it is about 45,000lbs.

  • @kimchi2780
    @kimchi2780 5 месяцев назад

    The TU22Ms are terrible planes.

  • @kirganthexder6582
    @kirganthexder6582 Год назад

    What?! B-2 is a very bad bomber. It' slow, unmaneveurable, and simply unflyable without electronics. It's only advantage is stealth, whicj is overestimated.

    • @yomama629
      @yomama629 7 месяцев назад +2

      All these other bombers would get shot out of the sky by IADS before reaching their targets. Stealth, which isn't "overestimated" as you claim, allows the B-2 to reach its targets without being detected

    • @Wumbo57
      @Wumbo57 5 месяцев назад

      Skeptics have called it “overestimated” since the F-117, yet… it works, sooooo…