Because they're sleeping in the same bed. Thats how business and marketing works. They're only two companies in the world with producing low end to high end gpus. One has to be the leader while the other takes a hand of lesser competitor. Even the the CEO's look alike lol. The question is not really why. But how they both profit while selling you the idea of competition.
Well they are actually related so that explains their common characteristics. I’d also challenge you on your theory, only because they both answer to shareholders. Tough to collude when you’re fiduciary responsibility supersedes any other hidden strategic motives such as those you suggest.
Because they're sleeping in the same bed. Thats how business and marketing works. They're only two companies in the world with producing low end to high end gpus. One has to be the leader while the other takes a hand of lesser competitor. Even the the CEO's look alike lol. The question is not really why. But how they both profit while selling you the idea of competition.
Well they are actually related so that explains their common characteristics.
I’d also challenge you on your theory, only because they both answer to shareholders. Tough to collude when you’re fiduciary responsibility supersedes any other hidden strategic motives such as those you suggest.