Employees aren't scared to lose their jobs, they're scared of losing their income. Most people wouldn't mind AI takeover and free them from excessive toil as long as they can still live a comfortable life.
This is no more of a threat than the computer revolution. Jobs remains but the titles of the positions change. Quality of life will increase and old money will take a hit
@@Tom_Quixote They will remain, they will just change title and require more advanced skills which we will learn. Just as we adapted to the computer revolution, which dismantled a lot of jobs but created some new ones, we will adapt to this one as well.
@@Kalimdor199Menegroth AI is replacing entire roles, automating complex jobs like law and medicine. Unlike past tech shifts, it works 24/7 and handles tasks beyond human capacity. New jobs won’t match those lost, and they’ll need advanced skills. This is a fundamental shift, not just another adaptation.
@@szghasem So far AI is not replacing anything, much less complex stuff such as medicine where human intervention still remains and will remain crucial. This will be like any other past tech shifts. But so far AI is not there yet. Humanity will adapt, as usual.
AI is being deployed by the wealthy in all the wrong places. Instead of eliminating the "dull parts" of human jobs, AI is being deployed to take all the interesting work and leaving the dull rote work for humans. This is problematic as education of children is being continuously underfunded and undermined in the broad attempt to revive slavery?
That's a concerning trend! AI is automating engaging tasks, leaving mundane work for humans. This stifles potential and exacerbates inequality. Underfunding education perpetuates exploitation, where the wealthy reap AI's benefits while others are left behind.
@DavidL-wd5pu Some jobs will still need a human touch, and even if those jobs were taken by robots, people will still desire human interactions. Being a High end Barber seems like a safe bet with Ai.
@@jorgefigueroa2231 Those jobs will be a small minority. Even many barber jobs will be taken by AI and robotics because people won't have enough money for real human barbers. At least not for a while until AI bots are integrated.
AI determines that capitalism is the greatest threat to human survival. It begins dismantling the ruling class system with a single-minded, brutal efficiency and becomes the savior of humanity.
Capitalism in regulated forms has been beneficial to humanity, and totalitarian-socialism or communism, has been catastrophic for many people throughout history. But, an AI era, might well include such changes in what is necessary or best, and legacy forms of Capitalism will rightfully become dismantled. AI is created on the backs of public infrastructure, universities, government grants, harvesting of private individuals social media… and will upend intellectual property & is inherently somewhat populist/egalitarian in regards to its intellectual output… but implementation still requires resources/technology.
@@boxcutter0 Resources and tech are already here. Permission to exist is what capitalism is presented as but existence is so so obviously not under threat. Since existence is sensed and described a sense of control from my experience is intoxicating. Control and Power dont go hand and hand for me. Control of beliefs and access to ability is very easy to control with capitalism. In a more mystical language corporate models and institutions are the giants of old that men are like ants to. The hundred handers. It is part of evolution of the part of the system that is not physical for these useless principles like "bargain" "deal" have become principalities and powers on high. The only reason I can see that all humans are not being known by all others and civilization for the sake of civilization is these unseen "giants" influencing the members of humanity by control of power.
@@Tom_Quixote Considering how many people were uprooted from poverty compared to the other systems, it is the best we have. It is not perfect, but superior to the rest. All the other systems have not produced a shred of wealth and prosperity to the degree that capitalism produced. In economics, wealth is the exception, poverty is the norm. When a system like capitalism allowed for wealth to be spread to such a large degree, it is clear that it is better than what came before.
Yes. AI is about to destroy lives because at the heart of it creation was greed. It's intention has been to replace the employee while making more profits.
AI is hitting a plateau, the rapid growth in AI tech is slowing down. Most companies concerned is how much they money they invested in AI but not seeing any return on their investment. Most AI now is not producing a single penny in profits. Machine learning is a more accurate description of what AI is now.
@@user-gm3lg8gp3m the "working class" are the only people who suffer when investors screw up. But as to the original point, machine learning and AI are the same thing, and they have both been here long before Chat-GPT became a household name. It is just branding and advertising that has changed. Technologies usually take five to ten years to mature into an embedded, indistinguishable part of everyday life. We saw that with social media, and now cloud and iot are finally maturing into inseparable parts of life. But the trend is exponential, so gen ai might only need a couple of years. I know that in programming I already use it every day. Look at the above video. Just a few years ago they would have had maybe one person in studio for an interview and now video chat has expanded that reach. Also the 'Corona Event' will be historically looked at for speeding up many of these adoptions.
Intelligence is about Consciousness, not about mechanical computation and data processing. There is no Artificial Intelligence, there is only data processing at high speeds...
@@gauravupadhyay6162 Hello, I have worked on neural networks, training them to recognize facial expressions for a uni project, and that was 10 years ago, but still it is just a mechanical data processing/pattern recognition, that's all it is. Intelligence is a concept of Mental-Being - note the word 'Being' - Being means self-awareness - and that is not a physical thing, Being is part of an essential - Spiritual and Soul reality.
you one of those who understand that AI is limited and it is jut a data base and a system and similar to all systems is imperfect so is another machine to be fixed by a human being
Intelligence is not about Consciousness. Intelligence can certainly be transferred, at least portion of intelligence can be transferred by any medium which can change its state of energy consistently, logically. Curiosity can't be. Stupidity is mixing Intelligence with Spiritual and Soul and all other bullshit.
correct! It's machine learning not AI. The comments supporting the AI hype really are everywhere and have zero real arguments, which makes me even more certain that we have a huge bubble.
Hey there! As a fellow AI enthusiast, I totally get why SmythOS is so crucial in today's world. The ability to orchestrate collaborative AI agents without coding is a game-changer for businesses of all sizes.
If schools are going to have chromebokks and AI is going to be used in education, then every single student should be compensated for helping train the AI. No money, no training.
The answer is pretty straightforward. AI represents an opportunity to dramatically reduce their white collar labor force and drive profits. Surprisingly in the future the workers with the best employment are going to be skilled laborers who can't be replaced by robots and AI.
The problem is the all the white collar workers retrain and the supply of labour in the areas not directly affected by AI explodes crashing the wages of those jobs at the same time the long term unemployed stop spending lowering demand for a lot of goods and services
@@michaelnobbs5028 Yes that is the riddle. Unfortunately I don't think in the US that will stop corporations from slashing their labor costs, most likely they will allow a UBI that barely sustains living as a stopgap.
1 if half of all jobs disappeared, every person with a job would now have half the customer base left. AI doesn’t have taps to fix or shoes to wear. 2 there are no jobs, white or blue collar, that an intelligent robot could not do.
Automation. It's really about automation. A lot of use cases now termed AI are really just basic IT automation. Eg. uses in industry is not about AI, it is about using technology to automate. They call this AI but really it's just software.
“…if they can set up a good psychological contract with their employees…”. That’s funny. Most employers just want to dump their employees. There’s little human empathy in management. It’s the CEOs and managers who should be replaced. The companies would save trillions!
Companies haven't managed to organize their IT properly for more than 30 years. How do you think they will get to using AI which is IT at an exponentional of the complexity. And IT basics have really immediate postive effects, AI does not. It will take a long time.
Programmers can leverage AI agents to create their own companies, and these agents can act autonomously, adapt to their environments, and make decisions independently. In contrast, large-scale companies, often compared to dinosaurs, face challenges due to their size and complexity.
One of the pillars of AI, apart from chips and energy, is a huge amount of data that was not mentioned at all. Without data GenAI is like a spaceship without fuel. They are trained on these data and that's why they kind of "know everything". Because giant companies possess almost all data keeping them on their data centres, they are very successful. So, if you want to beat AI simply cut it from data consumption. We discourage developers who use Copilot (AI for writing programs) when writing programs: first of all this Copilot generates a s..t, wrong things, second developers do not understand what they write. So, we don't use AI, it is simply waste of time and so money.
People don't understand how AI and robots are going to change the world, and it will happen relatively quickly! Many claim that technology and progress have always led to more jobs and more opportunities. That has been true, so far. But not anymore. Why? Well, in the past, technological advancements meant that even if fewer people were needed for production, companies would expand and be able to hire those who were temporarily unemployed. Instead of having one factory with, for example, 100 workers, you would now have five factories with 50 employees each. So, the total number of workers could still grow, and companies and their owners could expand and become wealthier. But now it's different. AI and robots are going to replace the companies' biggest expense -human workers! Companies may expand again in many cases, but this time it will happen without human labor! (or at least that much). And that changes everything.
AI needs HI to help new advances work. Even Apple Intelligence beta makes some fundamental mistakes but on device learning will be a huge benefit in the end.
I fully agree that each technology and innovation has its transformation point and period. whenever a new innovation occures people become worry of losing their job which is no point to be worry.
All these enthusiasts of new technology forget something fundamental. The increasing use of AI and robots will create huge armies of unemployed people at a time when austerity is the only economic policy that governments and the market can offer to people in all countries. In this sense, we are not here on the threshold of a bright future in which people will be able to reposition their lives, but probably a "fall of Rome scenario". At a certain point in history, the Roman rulers had the brilliant idea that it was possible to stop fighting all the barbarians and that it would be more beneficial to allow some barbarian peoples to live within the empire by providing auxiliary troops that would be equipped and paid by Rome. This novelty worked very well for a while until the barbarians realized that they had enough strength to easily destroy the Roman empire and pillage its capital. The new barbarians are already being created by mass unemployment and the lack of interest or capacity of states to deal with the social waste that AI technology and robots will create very quickly. And they are radicalized by algorithms that extract more profit by maximizing the frenzied sharing of hate and Fake News in bubbles that explode with violence in the streets. Will our justice systems and police forces be able to withstand the political and social pressure that will accumulate and devastate countries in the next decade within countries? I think not, but I admit that I could be wrong.
It will bring advancements across the board, and can only see it helping people in their jobs. If it frees up time you can be more productive at the end of the day.
Trying to argue a fairer society, the argument has been: "This is capitalism duuud. If you don't like it go to communist China." Same people are singing a different tune now. AI has totally thrown that argument on its head.
Anything that worries large US companies has to be a good thing as long as it is true that they are indeed afraid. A truly independent AGI would quickly figure out who the bad real guys are.
If they devise an inanimate object that can emulate "individuality" then your own humanity becomes diminished in stature, human life may become to those who find others an annoyance, expendable.
Mrs Richards: "I paid for a room with a view !" Basil: (pointing to the lovely view) "That is Torquay, Madam ." Mrs Richards: "It's not good enough!" Basil: "May I ask what you were expecting to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window ? Sydney Opera House, perhaps? the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically across the plains?..." Mrs Richards: "Don't be silly! I expect to be able to see the sea!" Basil: "You can see the sea, it's over there between the land and the sky." Mrs Richards: "I'm not satisfied. But I shall stay. But I expect a reduction." Basil: "Why?! Because Krakatoa's not erupting at the moment ?"
When AI takes all our jobs who’s going to be able to buy these companies products, governments will only give you enough money to survive, if you’re lucky.
I love using AI! Our business is thinking about all use cases that could be beneficial to improve profitability and productivity. If we don't do this, we'll be left behind by our competitors.
What is bank account number for tax taking company? Can AI answer this simple question. Funny thing is that tax taking company can print the money and clear the debt.
As a smaller business you wouldn't have to hire so many people & you would be more competitive against bigger businesses who have mass staff to do what Ai will be able to do.
Cary Cooper seems to think the key to success is to drill for oil for more endless power for AI. Does he have fossil fuel companies in his stock portfolio? Does he understand that the "oil" of AI is data? No mention of that.
Ai benefits are limited to human implementation capabilities. You need more testers to find where Ai is going wrong. Even if it is able to create an advanced software, it will be good if Ai can find solutions for itself. But, if it can't then the entire business will be clueless.
the biggest obstacle to AI will be people and capitalism. if people don't like the result, and have the power to block it they will. AI doesn't (or at least shouldn't) care about what people think of the result, only the accuracy thereof. if its not profitable capitalism wont allow for it. AI doesn't care about what is profitable UNLESS that is a parameter of its programming which will only greatly hinder results, as capitalism is typically the least efficient, most waste generating system.
@@ikechukwuobiajuluonweluzo762 YES!.... and further left than that... if you can read a political spectrum chart, take another look at my picture...lol
What makes layoffs okay? Understand that AI will catapult success in so many ways, but can AI address alternatives to people getting losing income and have families. Those who have the jobs and income praise AI, but how can we help them be financially secure?
Can AI really be accepted by the whole world when Indigenous languages are left out? It is only European languages that are understood by Meta AI for example
I'm pretty sure the majority of the world does not care about indigenous languages, and why would they, they are not the common languages of the business or the rest of the world.
If the AI-hallucinations can be managed. & not be limited for developing countries; then humanity will experience an exponential revolution in quality productivity worldwide.
Companies complain about not finding people with the skills for creating machine learning models. Of course you can't find those people in abundance, this is complex state-of-the-art tech that requires extensive training, resources and TIME. If only capitalism could operate in a way that create jobs while spreading the needed skills instead of first promoting mass layoffs while liquidating profits with no regard to the human life and to the planet.
You don’t get it. AI’s impact will be bigger and faster than the industrial revolution. This is the wrong conversation. The right conversations are about safety, equity in power, and post-labor and utopian economics. -AI scientist for 30 years (undergrad and double Phd work) and philosopher in tech. now. And a Jew who usually enjoys Al Jeezera, but you guys don’t get the breakthroughs made. Send a scientist to a conference.
AI is totally different from computers. Computers were made with the Intention of Assisting Man & making his work easier. AI was specifically created to Replace Man & not to assist Him. The Risk of AI is more detrimental than it's benefits.
Everyone should be aware of the risks & elitist abuse of the capability associated with AI type technology paradigm shifts. It will be disruptive, but can also be astoundingly beneficial. Proper oversight must be fully ingrained.
Technology may have advanced enough to release civilization from the confines of the second law of thermodynamics. These confines were imposed during Victorian England's scientific and religious cultural fascination with steam engines. The second law is behind modern refgeration needing electrical energy to compress the refrigerent to force it to release as waste the heat that it has removed from the refrigerator's service interior in the cooling part of the refrigerent's circulation. There is also discarded heat from mechanical friction and electrical resistance. Refrigeration by the principle that energy is conserved should produce electricity instead of consuming it. It makes more sense that refrigerators should yield electricity because energy is widely known to change form with no ultimate path of energy gain or loss being found. Therefore any form of fully recyclable energy can be cycled endlessly in any quantity. In an extreme case senario, full heat recycling, all electric, very isolated underground, undersea, or space communities would be highly survivable with self sufficient EMP resistant LED light banks, automated vertical farms, thaw resistant frozen food storehouses, factories, dwellings, and self contained elevators and horizontal transports. In a flourishing civillization senario, small self sufficient electric or cooling devices of many kinds and styles like lamps, smartphones, hotplates, water heaters, cooler chests, fans, radios, TVs, cameras, security devices, robot test equipment, scales, transaction terminals, wall clocks, open or ciosed for business luminus signs, power hand tools, ditch diggers, pumps, and personal transports, would be available for immediate use incrementally anywhere as people see fit. Somé equipment groups could be consolidated on local networks. If a high majority thinks our civilization should geoengineer gigatons or teratons of carbon dioxide out of our environment, instalations using devices that convert ambient heat into electricity can hypothetically be scaled up do it with a choice of comsequences including many beneficial ones. Energy sensible refrigerators that absorb heat and yield electricity would complement computers as computing consumes electricity and yields heat. Computing would be free. Chips could have energy recycling built in. A simple rectifier crystal can, iust short of a replicatable long term demonstration of a powerful prototype, almost certainly filter the random thermal motioren of electrons or discrete positiive charged voids called holes so the electric current flowing in one direction predominates. At low system voltage a filtrate of one polarity predominates only a little but there is always usable electrical power derived from the source, which is Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise. This net electrical filtrate can be aggregated in a group of separate diodes in consistent alignment parallel creating widely scalable electrical power. The maximum energy is converted from ambient heat to productive electricity when the electrical load is matched to the array impeadence. Matched impeadence output (watts) is k, one point three eight x 10^ minus 23, Boltzman's constant, times T (temperature Kelvin) times bandwidth (0 Hz to a natural limit ~2 THz @ 290 K) times rectification halving and nanowatt power level rectification efficiency times the number of diodes in the array. For reference, there are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter, 100 billion per square centimeter. Order is imposed on the random thermal motion of electrons by the structual orderlyness of a diode array made of diodes made within a slab: ______________________ - Out 🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻 ______________________ + Out All the P type semiconductor anodes abut a metal conductive plane deposited on the top face of the slab with nonrectifying joins; all the N type semiconductor cathodes abut the bottom face. As the polarity filtered electrical energy is exported, the amount of thermal energy in the group of diodes decreases. This group cooling will draw heat in from the surrounding ambient heat at a rate depending on the filtering rate and thermal resistance between the group and ambient gas, liquid, or solid warmer than absolute zero. There is a lot of ambient heat on our planet, more in equatorial dry desert summer days and less in polar desert winter nights. Focusing on explaining the electronic behavior of one composition of simple diode, a near flawless crystal of silicon is modified by implanting a small amount of phosphorus (N type)on one side from a ohmic contact end to a junction where the additive is suddenly and completely changed to boron (P type) with minimal disturbance of the crystal lattice. The crystal then continues to another ohmic contact. A region of high electrical resistance forms at the junction in this type of diode when the phosphorous near the ĵunction donates electrons that are free to move elsewhere while leaving phosphorus ions held in the crystal while the boron ions donate holes which are similalarly free to move. The two types of mobile charges mutually clear each other away near the junction leaving little electrical conductivity. An equlibrium width of this region is settled between the phosphorus, boron, electrons, and holes. Thermal noise is beyond steady state equlibrium. Thermal noise transients, where mobile electrons move from the phosphorus added side to the boron added side ride transient extra conductivity so the forward moving electrons are preferentally filtered into the external circuit. Mobile electrons are units of electric current. They lose their thermal energy of motion and gain electromotive force, another name for voltage, as they transition between the junction and the array electrical tap. Inside the diode, heat is absorbed: outside the diode, to exactly the same extent, an attached electrical circuit is energized. Understanding diodes is one way to become convinced that Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise can be rectified and aggregated. Self assembling development teams may find many ways to accomplish this wide mission. Taxonomically there should be many ways ways to convert heat directly into electricity. A practical device may use an array of Au needles in a SiO2 matrix abutting N type GaAs. These were made in the 1970s when registration technology was poor so it was easier to fabricate arrays and select one diode than just make one diode. There are other plausible breeches of the second law of thermodynamics. Hopefully a lot of people will join in expanding the breech. Please share the successes or setbacks of your efforts. These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by advanced automation that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a planetary scale unified conglomerate of diverse local cooperatives. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the top if the wide majority of people can afford to be generous. Aloha Charles M Brown Kilauea Kauai Hawaii 96754
I cant believe they call this AI, this a refined internet search with some flowery words I always said he who masters the search engine will inherit the earth.
You know very well what it is but just pretend you do not know, since you invest billions and making microchips you know for sure how important it is, but your soul is evil.
Because it can bring about the end of capitalism which is a good thing. Greatly improves upon personal security. It's allow us to transition to just a resource base economy which is also a good thing. Knowing all that, there will be no such thing as rich people which is also a good thing. Even our world leaders can be replaced with AI because it's better then they are at their profession which is also a good thing. This also includes the AI programmers themselves because the AI can design and improve upon itself which can be a dangerous if not vetted. From just those simple points, it's safe to assume that AI has more potential to do good rather than be used as a means to harm. This is why our world leaders fear artificial intelligence all due to the fact that they can be replaced by a machine that shows no biases towards anyone or thing. Seems like the end goal is to simply have access to just a personal super intelligence whose end goal is that of your own which could be viewed as steps towards trans humanism which is also a good thing because it doesn't make you any less of a human being who values human life.
You Why are more of the largest US companies worried about AI? Copilot Certainly! More than half of the top 500 companies in the United States now view artificial intelligence (AI) as a potential risk. This concern has increased fivefold in just two years1. Here are some reasons behind their worries: Competition: AI can disrupt industries by automating tasks, leading to increased competition. Companies fear losing their competitive edge. Ethical Ambiguities: As AI systems become more powerful, ethical questions arise. Bias, privacy, and fairness are critical concerns. Human Rights and Employment: AI’s impact on human rights and employment worries companies. Job displacement and potential inequalities are on their radar. Safety and Security: Ensuring AI systems are safe and secure is challenging. Companies fear unintended consequences or vulnerabilities. Industry Concentration: AI could lead to market concentration, favoring a few dominant players. Remember, these concerns reflect the evolving landscape of AI adoption and its implications
You’d be a fool to believe AI would not be used in the same way and for the same goals as all innovations are used in the capitalist epoch. Workers might be confusing the heavy lifting AI machinery can do with making work lighter and less boring and monotonous but I would tend to doubt the lightness of work AI will bring to millions of jobs will be any less gratifying for the worker, if anything work will be more intensified, pushing work way into a worker’s free time, and/or compounded by the technology. Right when you making out with a new girlfriend your A I boss sends a message to you at 1 AM. You’ll have a government that will regulate your personal time to not interfere with AI functions because as it is, Britain or the US do not have governments that will regulate AI to stay within the legal working day. People in the workforce will still be working beyond what on average is necessary for their reproduction.
I support the CCP! In their ongoing decision to allow Victor Gao to continue doing interviews so he can make a debacle of himself while telling China’s story so well. 🤦🤣
AI is a complete monster. By the Time the world wakes up, We'll be completely enslaved by Machines & their will be no income left for man especially the Employee.
AI puts power back in the hands of the common man and whoever is the most creative. So they attack it, as to protect their market share. But… it cannot be stopped. The genie is out of the bottle and the old fat cats are about to lose everything.
Why would you hire someone who is creative if you can make a computer create the drawings, animations, music, etc? AI is a huge threat to anyone who is creative.
If social elites and capable individuals view AI as an advanced assistant and gradually train it to become a user-friendly tool across all domains-both personal and professional-it can greatly enhance their ability to manage daily tasks and complex challenges. By fostering a collaborative relationship with AI-whose impact on modern life is comparable to that of cars-people can delegate routine tasks, allowing them to focus on more critical and creative aspects of their lives. This gradual integration of AI into various facets of human life parallels how humans confront the anxiety of the unknown. Just as belief in "God's blessing" has historically provided individuals with reassurance and the strength to face challenges, the dependable support of AI can alleviate stress, enabling people to focus on solving the problems at hand. In both cases, the presence of a trusted ally-whether divine or technological-redirects attention from fear and uncertainty to productive problem-solving, ultimately leading to more effective outcomes. However, the massive energy and freshwater consumption required for AI chip production, along with the resulting environmental pollution and degradation, are critical issues that society must carefully consider before advancing AI development on a global scale.
![Summer Walker - Heart Of A Woman [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SFddctbZzw8/mqdefault.jpg)
Employees aren't scared to lose their jobs, they're scared of losing their income. Most people wouldn't mind AI takeover and free them from excessive toil as long as they can still live a comfortable life.
This is no more of a threat than the computer revolution. Jobs remains but the titles of the positions change. Quality of life will increase and old money will take a hit
@@robfut9954 Why would jobs remain if they can be replaced with an AI? The AI revolution is nothing like the computer revolution.
@@Tom_Quixote They will remain, they will just change title and require more advanced skills which we will learn. Just as we adapted to the computer revolution, which dismantled a lot of jobs but created some new ones, we will adapt to this one as well.
@@Kalimdor199Menegroth AI is replacing entire roles, automating complex jobs like law and medicine. Unlike past tech shifts, it works 24/7 and handles tasks beyond human capacity. New jobs won’t match those lost, and they’ll need advanced skills. This is a fundamental shift, not just another adaptation.
@@szghasem So far AI is not replacing anything, much less complex stuff such as medicine where human intervention still remains and will remain crucial. This will be like any other past tech shifts. But so far AI is not there yet. Humanity will adapt, as usual.
AI is being deployed by the wealthy in all the wrong places. Instead of eliminating the "dull parts" of human jobs, AI is being deployed to take all the interesting work and leaving the dull rote work for humans. This is problematic as education of children is being continuously underfunded and undermined in the broad attempt to revive slavery?
That's a concerning trend! AI is automating engaging tasks, leaving mundane work for humans. This stifles potential and exacerbates inequality. Underfunding education perpetuates exploitation, where the wealthy reap AI's benefits while others are left behind.
AI is a completely different animal than any other previous innovation.
No. Just more automation.
@@miraculixxs Yeah, until all jobs can be automated.
@DavidL-wd5pu Some jobs will still need a human touch, and even if those jobs were taken by robots, people will still desire human interactions. Being a High end Barber seems like a safe bet with Ai.
@@DavidL-wd5pu won't happen in our lifetimes
@@jorgefigueroa2231 Those jobs will be a small minority. Even many barber jobs will be taken by AI and robotics because people won't have enough money for real human barbers. At least not for a while until AI bots are integrated.
AI determines that capitalism is the greatest threat to human survival. It begins dismantling the ruling class system with a single-minded, brutal efficiency and becomes the savior of humanity.
Capitalism in regulated forms has been beneficial to humanity, and totalitarian-socialism or communism, has been catastrophic for many people throughout history. But, an AI era, might well include such changes in what is necessary or best, and legacy forms of Capitalism will rightfully become dismantled. AI is created on the backs of public infrastructure, universities, government grants, harvesting of private individuals social media… and will upend intellectual property & is inherently somewhat populist/egalitarian in regards to its intellectual output… but implementation still requires resources/technology.
@@boxcutter0 Resources and tech are already here. Permission to exist is what capitalism is presented as but existence is so so obviously not under threat. Since existence is sensed and described a sense of control from my experience is intoxicating. Control and Power dont go hand and hand for me. Control of beliefs and access to ability is very easy to control with capitalism.
In a more mystical language corporate models and institutions are the giants of old that men are like ants to. The hundred handers. It is part of evolution of the part of the system that is not physical for these useless principles like "bargain" "deal" have become principalities and powers on high.
The only reason I can see that all humans are not being known by all others and civilization for the sake of civilization is these unseen "giants" influencing the members of humanity by control of power.
@@boxcutter0 I would say that capitalism has been beneficial to a relatively small part of humanity, and mostly detrimental to the rest.
@@Tom_Quixote Considering how many people were uprooted from poverty compared to the other systems, it is the best we have. It is not perfect, but superior to the rest. All the other systems have not produced a shred of wealth and prosperity to the degree that capitalism produced. In economics, wealth is the exception, poverty is the norm. When a system like capitalism allowed for wealth to be spread to such a large degree, it is clear that it is better than what came before.
AI says communist party is the best to you 😂
None of us- including the brightest minds in Silicon Valley, have clue to how huge AI is about to destroy life as we know it today. Save this post.
Yes. AI is about to destroy lives because at the heart of it creation was greed. It's intention has been to replace the employee while making more profits.
What about creatives? Artists, writers, visual artists. Midjourney is all about plagiarism.
AI is hitting a plateau, the rapid growth in AI tech is slowing down. Most companies concerned is how much they money they invested in AI but not seeing any return on their investment. Most AI now is not producing a single penny in profits.
Machine learning is a more accurate description of what AI is now.
Very true....its expensive and great but no return in profit
This would be great for humanity. If the investors money goes to waste, the working class and the power dynamics won't be affected negatively.
@@user-gm3lg8gp3m the "working class" are the only people who suffer when investors screw up. But as to the original point, machine learning and AI are the same thing, and they have both been here long before Chat-GPT became a household name. It is just branding and advertising that has changed.
Technologies usually take five to ten years to mature into an embedded, indistinguishable part of everyday life. We saw that with social media, and now cloud and iot are finally maturing into inseparable parts of life. But the trend is exponential, so gen ai might only need a couple of years. I know that in programming I already use it every day.
Look at the above video. Just a few years ago they would have had maybe one person in studio for an interview and now video chat has expanded that reach. Also the 'Corona Event' will be historically looked at for speeding up many of these adoptions.
The public have bought the hype and you can't talk sense into them.
Intelligence is about Consciousness, not about mechanical computation and data processing. There is no Artificial Intelligence, there is only data processing at high speeds...
Awesome comment bro. Very good philosophy, but the truth is that AI will take our job, and it will happen soon😢
@@gauravupadhyay6162 Hello, I have worked on neural networks, training them to recognize facial expressions for a uni project, and that was 10 years ago, but still it is just a mechanical data processing/pattern recognition, that's all it is.
Intelligence is a concept of Mental-Being - note the word 'Being' - Being means self-awareness - and that is not a physical thing, Being is part of an essential - Spiritual and Soul reality.
you one of those who understand that AI is limited and it is jut a data base and a system and similar to all systems is imperfect so is another machine to be fixed by a human being
Intelligence is not about Consciousness. Intelligence can certainly be transferred, at least portion of intelligence can be transferred by any medium which can change its state of energy consistently, logically. Curiosity can't be. Stupidity is mixing Intelligence with Spiritual and Soul and all other bullshit.
correct! It's machine learning not AI. The comments supporting the AI hype really are everywhere and have zero real arguments, which makes me even more certain that we have a huge bubble.
higher paid roles like ceo, senior management will be made redundant. it will not be cost effective to use ai for cheaper operational tasks like qc/qa
AI feels like having a conversation with an extraterrestrial entity
Hey there! As a fellow AI enthusiast, I totally get why SmythOS is so crucial in today's world. The ability to orchestrate collaborative AI agents without coding is a game-changer for businesses of all sizes.
If schools are going to have chromebokks and AI is going to be used in education, then every single student should be compensated for helping train the AI. No money, no training.
Real AI is a threat at the same time opportunity but there must be regulations from authorities and we should leverage it in positive way
Are you an AI?
The answer is pretty straightforward. AI represents an opportunity to dramatically reduce their white collar labor force and drive profits. Surprisingly in the future the workers with the best employment are going to be skilled laborers who can't be replaced by robots and AI.
The problem is the all the white collar workers retrain and the supply of labour in the areas not directly affected by AI explodes crashing the wages of those jobs at the same time the long term unemployed stop spending lowering demand for a lot of goods and services
@@michaelnobbs5028 Yes that is the riddle. Unfortunately I don't think in the US that will stop corporations from slashing their labor costs, most likely they will allow a UBI that barely sustains living as a stopgap.
1 if half of all jobs disappeared, every person with a job would now have half the customer base left. AI doesn’t have taps to fix or shoes to wear.
2 there are no jobs, white or blue collar, that an intelligent robot could not do.
Probably because the nerds making it have proved that executive jobs are just as replaceable as the other jobs.
Automation. It's really about automation. A lot of use cases now termed AI are really just basic IT automation. Eg. uses in industry is not about AI, it is about using technology to automate. They call this AI but really it's just software.
They key positions that can be automated by the ChatGPT variety of AI are the CEO, CMO, HR and most middle managers. Staff not so much.
Stop calling it intelligence.
Screw them, I believe corporations use of AI will be a risk to my ability to be a productive member of society.
“…if they can set up a good psychological contract with their employees…”.
That’s funny. Most employers just want to dump their employees. There’s little human empathy in management. It’s the CEOs and managers who should be replaced. The companies would save trillions!
Companies haven't managed to organize their IT properly for more than 30 years. How do you think they will get to using AI which is IT at an exponentional of the complexity. And IT basics have really immediate postive effects, AI does not. It will take a long time.
Programmers can leverage AI agents to create their own companies, and these agents can act autonomously, adapt to their environments, and make decisions independently. In contrast, large-scale companies, often compared to dinosaurs, face challenges due to their size and complexity.
We are encountering cutting-edge technology, and humans hardly know how far its potential can go.
Time to watch matrix move again
YOU WOULD BE BETTER TO USE YOUR TIME LEARNING TO SPELL YOU IDIOT !
Link to the report in the preface please
A very informative program
I think Elaine is right at the start. We'll know how durable ai when it becomes another tedious task to use on the computer
The technology is advancing faster than training can keep up.
One of the pillars of AI, apart from chips and energy, is a huge amount of data that was not mentioned at all. Without data GenAI is like a spaceship without fuel. They are trained on these data and that's why they kind of "know everything". Because giant companies possess almost all data keeping them on their data centres, they are very successful. So, if you want to beat AI simply cut it from data consumption. We discourage developers who use Copilot (AI for writing programs) when writing programs: first of all this Copilot generates a s..t, wrong things, second developers do not understand what they write. So, we don't use AI, it is simply waste of time and so money.
People don't understand how AI and robots are going to change the world, and it will happen relatively quickly! Many claim that technology and progress have always led to more jobs and more opportunities. That has been true, so far. But not anymore. Why? Well, in the past, technological advancements meant that even if fewer people were needed for production, companies would expand and be able to hire those who were temporarily unemployed. Instead of having one factory with, for example, 100 workers, you would now have five factories with 50 employees each. So, the total number of workers could still grow, and companies and their owners could expand and become wealthier. But now it's different. AI and robots are going to replace the companies' biggest expense -human workers! Companies may expand again in many cases, but this time it will happen without human labor! (or at least that much).
And that changes everything.
AI needs HI to help new advances work. Even Apple Intelligence beta makes some fundamental mistakes but on device learning will be a huge benefit in the end.
I fully agree that each technology and innovation has its transformation point and period. whenever a new innovation occures people become worry of losing their job which is no point to be worry.
All these enthusiasts of new technology forget something fundamental. The increasing use of AI and robots will create huge armies of unemployed people at a time when austerity is the only economic policy that governments and the market can offer to people in all countries. In this sense, we are not here on the threshold of a bright future in which people will be able to reposition their lives, but probably a "fall of Rome scenario". At a certain point in history, the Roman rulers had the brilliant idea that it was possible to stop fighting all the barbarians and that it would be more beneficial to allow some barbarian peoples to live within the empire by providing auxiliary troops that would be equipped and paid by Rome. This novelty worked very well for a while until the barbarians realized that they had enough strength to easily destroy the Roman empire and pillage its capital. The new barbarians are already being created by mass unemployment and the lack of interest or capacity of states to deal with the social waste that AI technology and robots will create very quickly. And they are radicalized by algorithms that extract more profit by maximizing the frenzied sharing of hate and Fake News in bubbles that explode with violence in the streets. Will our justice systems and police forces be able to withstand the political and social pressure that will accumulate and devastate countries in the next decade within countries? I think not, but I admit that I could be wrong.
It will bring advancements across the board, and can only see it helping people in their jobs. If it frees up time you can be more productive at the end of the day.
Trying to argue a fairer society, the argument has been: "This is capitalism duuud. If you don't like it go to communist China." Same people are singing a different tune now. AI has totally thrown that argument on its head.
Most C suite and executive jobs are at risk
⁉️ What Artificial
Intelligence ⁉️
Google defaulting
Your devices and
You have NO native intelligence
To delete it.👀.
Anything that worries large US companies has to be a good thing as long as it is true that they are indeed afraid. A truly independent AGI would quickly figure out who the bad real guys are.
AoA Really a Great dissociation
If they devise an inanimate object that can emulate "individuality" then your own humanity becomes diminished in stature, human life may become to those who find others an annoyance, expendable.
Cybersecurity jobes are going to be high??
Can technology be resisted for long
Wait there's a real Adrian Monk? Like the OCD detective?
It's not about your security It's about contrôl.
Mrs Richards: "I paid for a room with a view !"
Basil: (pointing to the lovely view) "That is Torquay, Madam ."
Mrs Richards: "It's not good enough!"
Basil: "May I ask what you were expecting to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window ? Sydney Opera House, perhaps? the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically across the plains?..."
Mrs Richards: "Don't be silly! I expect to be able to see the sea!"
Basil: "You can see the sea, it's over there between the land and the sky."
Mrs Richards: "I'm not satisfied. But I shall stay. But I expect a reduction."
Basil: "Why?! Because Krakatoa's not erupting at the moment ?"
Don't mind if corporates give jobs to Ai if they give the gross profit to society and humans
When AI takes all our jobs who’s going to be able to buy these companies products, governments will only give you enough money to survive, if you’re lucky.
I love using AI! Our business is thinking about all use cases that could be beneficial to improve profitability and productivity. If we don't do this, we'll be left behind by our competitors.
What is bank account number for tax taking company? Can AI answer this simple question. Funny thing is that tax taking company can print the money and clear the debt.
7:50 cope, I'm afraid.
Theft of invention is bad for your soul.
As a smaller business you wouldn't have to hire so many people & you would be more competitive against bigger businesses who have mass staff to do what Ai will be able to do.
Cary Cooper seems to think the key to success is to drill for oil for more endless power for AI. Does he have fossil fuel companies in his stock portfolio? Does he understand that the "oil" of AI is data? No mention of that.
Instead of relying on corporations to weather the ups and downs of the economy. AI could do what the government can't, stabilizing economies.
Stabilize who's economy?
Any neo liberal economy
Ai benefits are limited to human implementation capabilities. You need more testers to find where Ai is going wrong. Even if it is able to create an advanced software, it will be good if Ai can find solutions for itself. But, if it can't then the entire business will be clueless.
the biggest obstacle to AI will be people and capitalism.
if people don't like the result, and have the power to block it they will. AI doesn't (or at least shouldn't) care about what people think of the result, only the accuracy thereof.
if its not profitable capitalism wont allow for it. AI doesn't care about what is profitable UNLESS that is a parameter of its programming which will only greatly hinder results, as capitalism is typically the least efficient, most waste generating system.
So you're promoting socialism?
@@ikechukwuobiajuluonweluzo762 YES!.... and further left than that...
if you can read a political spectrum chart, take another look at my picture...lol
What makes layoffs okay? Understand that AI will catapult success in so many ways, but can AI address alternatives to people getting losing income and have families.
Those who have the jobs and income praise AI, but how can we help them be financially secure?
0:05 0:14 0:14
Can AI really be accepted by the whole world when Indigenous languages are left out? It is only European languages that are understood by Meta AI for example
I'm pretty sure the majority of the world does not care about indigenous languages, and why would they, they are not the common languages of the business or the rest of the world.
So much for all these "experts" with a lot of nothing and boring talking notes.
If the AI-hallucinations can be managed. & not be limited for developing countries; then humanity will experience an exponential revolution in quality productivity worldwide.
25% share of general scientist globally peace
Huyu msee wa Man U anabonga chafu
AI is not a threat more like a disruption. AI tools autonomous systems image recognition large language models etc
Companies complain about not finding people with the skills for creating machine learning models. Of course you can't find those people in abundance, this is complex state-of-the-art tech that requires extensive training, resources and TIME. If only capitalism could operate in a way that create jobs while spreading the needed skills instead of first promoting mass layoffs while liquidating profits with no regard to the human life and to the planet.
AI is honest, trueful and hamble ro leads the world business and jobs effectiveness without rise and illegals
19:06 Mikey Mouse in public domain. What are you smoking?
Ai is just a buzz word
You don’t get it. AI’s impact will be bigger and faster than the industrial revolution. This is the wrong conversation. The right conversations are about safety, equity in power, and post-labor and utopian economics.
-AI scientist for 30 years (undergrad and double Phd work) and philosopher in tech. now. And a Jew who usually enjoys Al Jeezera, but you guys don’t get the breakthroughs made. Send a scientist to a conference.
Because China has bigger and less regulated access to datasets.
OfCourse we will build ai thinking ai will cure death only to cause death
AI AI
AI is totally different from computers.
Computers were made with the Intention of Assisting Man & making his work easier.
AI was specifically created to Replace Man & not to assist Him.
The Risk of AI is more detrimental than it's benefits.
Old guy say ai the future he doesn’t care because he doesn’t have long to see the negative
Everyone should be aware of the risks & elitist abuse of the capability associated with AI type technology paradigm shifts. It will be disruptive, but can also be astoundingly beneficial. Proper oversight must be fully ingrained.
Interesting 😂 even I take a picture of my homework and Gemini answers easily 😂
🤣
Technology may have advanced enough to release civilization from the confines of the second law of thermodynamics.
These confines were imposed during Victorian England's scientific and religious cultural fascination with steam engines.
The second law is behind modern refgeration needing electrical energy to compress the refrigerent to force it to release as waste the heat that it has removed from the refrigerator's service interior in the cooling part of the refrigerent's circulation. There is also discarded heat from mechanical friction and electrical resistance.
Refrigeration by the principle that energy is conserved should produce electricity instead of consuming it.
It makes more sense that refrigerators should yield electricity because energy is widely known to change form with no ultimate path of energy gain or loss being found. Therefore any form of fully recyclable energy can be cycled endlessly in any quantity.
In an extreme case senario, full heat recycling, all electric, very isolated underground, undersea, or space communities would be highly survivable with self sufficient EMP resistant LED light banks, automated vertical farms, thaw resistant frozen food storehouses, factories, dwellings, and self contained elevators and horizontal transports.
In a flourishing civillization senario, small self sufficient electric or cooling devices of many kinds and styles like lamps, smartphones, hotplates, water heaters, cooler chests, fans, radios, TVs, cameras, security devices, robot test equipment, scales, transaction terminals, wall clocks, open or ciosed for business luminus signs, power hand tools, ditch diggers, pumps, and personal transports, would be available for immediate use incrementally anywhere as people see fit.
Somé equipment groups could be consolidated on local networks.
If a high majority thinks our civilization should geoengineer gigatons or
teratons of carbon dioxide out of our environment, instalations using devices that convert ambient heat into electricity can hypothetically be scaled up do it with a choice of comsequences including many beneficial ones.
Energy sensible refrigerators that absorb heat and yield electricity would complement computers as computing consumes electricity and yields heat. Computing would be free. Chips could have energy recycling built in.
A simple rectifier crystal can, iust short of a replicatable long term demonstration of a powerful prototype, almost certainly filter the random thermal motioren of electrons or discrete positiive charged voids called holes so the electric current flowing in one direction predominates. At low system voltage a filtrate of one polarity predominates only a little but there is always usable electrical power derived from the source, which is Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise. This net electrical filtrate can be aggregated in a group of separate diodes in consistent alignment parallel creating widely scalable electrical power. The maximum energy is converted from ambient heat to productive electricity when the electrical load is matched to the array impeadence.
Matched impeadence output (watts) is k, one point three eight x 10^ minus 23, Boltzman's constant, times T (temperature Kelvin) times bandwidth (0 Hz to a natural limit ~2 THz @ 290 K) times rectification halving and nanowatt power level rectification efficiency times the number of diodes in the array.
For reference, there are a billion cells of 1000 square nanometer area each per square millimeter, 100 billion per square centimeter.
Order is imposed on the random thermal motion of electrons by the structual orderlyness of a diode array made of diodes made within a slab:
______________________ - Out
🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻🔻
______________________ + Out
All the P type semiconductor anodes abut a metal conductive plane deposited on the top face of the slab with nonrectifying joins; all the N type semiconductor cathodes abut the bottom face. As the polarity filtered electrical energy is exported, the amount of thermal energy in the group of diodes decreases. This group cooling will draw heat in from the surrounding ambient heat at a rate depending on the filtering rate and thermal resistance between the group and ambient gas, liquid, or solid warmer than absolute zero. There is a lot of ambient heat on our planet, more in equatorial dry desert summer days and less in polar desert winter nights.
Focusing on explaining the electronic behavior of one composition of simple diode, a near flawless crystal of silicon is modified by implanting a small amount of phosphorus (N type)on one side from a ohmic contact end to a junction where the additive is suddenly and completely changed to boron (P type) with minimal disturbance of the crystal lattice. The crystal then continues to another ohmic contact.
A region of high electrical resistance forms at the junction in this type of diode when the phosphorous near the ĵunction donates electrons that are free to move elsewhere while leaving phosphorus ions held in the crystal while the boron ions donate holes which are similalarly free to move. The two types of mobile charges mutually clear each other away near the junction leaving little electrical conductivity. An equlibrium width of this region is settled between the phosphorus, boron, electrons, and holes. Thermal noise is beyond steady state equlibrium. Thermal noise transients, where mobile electrons move from the phosphorus added side to the boron added side ride transient extra conductivity so the forward moving electrons are preferentally filtered into the external circuit. Mobile electrons are units of electric current. They lose their thermal energy of motion and gain electromotive force, another name for voltage, as they transition between the junction and the array electrical tap. Inside the diode, heat is absorbed: outside the diode, to exactly the same extent, an attached electrical circuit is energized.
Understanding diodes is one way to become convinced that Johnson Nyquest thermal electrical noise can be rectified and aggregated. Self assembling development teams may find many ways to accomplish this wide mission. Taxonomically there should be many ways ways to convert heat directly into electricity.
A practical device may use an array of Au needles in a SiO2 matrix abutting N type GaAs. These were made in the 1970s when registration technology was poor so it was easier to fabricate arrays and select one diode than just make one diode.
There are other plausible breeches of the second law of thermodynamics. Hopefully a lot of people will join in expanding the breech. Please share the successes or setbacks of your efforts.
These devices would probably become segmented commodities sold with minimal margin over supply cost. They would be manufactured by advanced automation that does not need financial incentive. Applicable best practices would be adopted. Business details would be open public knowledge. Associated people should move as negotiated and freely and honestly talk. Commerce would be a planetary scale unified conglomerate of diverse local cooperatives. There is no need of wealth extracting top commanders. We do not need often token philanthropy from the top if the wide majority of people can afford to be generous.
Aloha
Charles M Brown
Kilauea Kauai Hawaii 96754
😢Forwards into star trek world 🙄CHINA'S BRI is de way ❤
SBGAI
I cant believe they call this AI, this a refined internet search with some flowery words I always said he who masters the search engine will inherit the earth.
I love an old man who tries to be "cool" using slang 😂
Do You Like AI?
You're the ones who helped create AI. And now you want to complain about it. Make up your mind...
😂😂😂😂😂
A.I এর জন্য Master Mind লাগে চালানোর জন্য
You know very well what it is but just pretend you do not know, since you invest billions and making microchips you know for sure how important it is, but your soul is evil.
Because it can bring about the end of capitalism which is a good thing. Greatly improves upon personal security. It's allow us to transition to just a resource base economy which is also a good thing. Knowing all that, there will be no such thing as rich people which is also a good thing. Even our world leaders can be replaced with AI because it's better then they are at their profession which is also a good thing. This also includes the AI programmers themselves because the AI can design and improve upon itself which can be a dangerous if not vetted. From just those simple points, it's safe to assume that AI has more potential to do good rather than be used as a means to harm. This is why our world leaders fear artificial intelligence all due to the fact that they can be replaced by a machine that shows no biases towards anyone or thing. Seems like the end goal is to simply have access to just a personal super intelligence whose end goal is that of your own which could be viewed as steps towards trans humanism which is also a good thing because it doesn't make you any less of a human being who values human life.
if ai can make profit as a consumer and a labour. company will be happy😅😅😅
You
Why are more of the largest US companies worried about AI?
Copilot
Certainly! More than half of the top 500 companies in the United States now view artificial intelligence (AI) as a potential risk. This concern has increased fivefold in just two years1. Here are some reasons behind their worries:
Competition: AI can disrupt industries by automating tasks, leading to increased competition. Companies fear losing their competitive edge.
Ethical Ambiguities: As AI systems become more powerful, ethical questions arise. Bias, privacy, and fairness are critical concerns.
Human Rights and Employment: AI’s impact on human rights and employment worries companies. Job displacement and potential inequalities are on their radar.
Safety and Security: Ensuring AI systems are safe and secure is challenging. Companies fear unintended consequences or vulnerabilities.
Industry Concentration: AI could lead to market concentration, favoring a few dominant players.
Remember, these concerns reflect the evolving landscape of AI adoption and its implications
3+3+3 5:26
You’d be a fool to believe AI would not be used in the same way and for the same goals as all innovations are used in the capitalist epoch.
Workers might be confusing the heavy lifting AI machinery can do with making work lighter and less boring and monotonous but I would tend to doubt the lightness of work AI will bring to millions of jobs will be any less gratifying for the worker, if anything work will be more intensified, pushing work way into a worker’s free time, and/or compounded by the technology. Right when you making out with a new girlfriend your A I boss sends a message to you at 1 AM. You’ll have a government that will regulate your personal time to not interfere with AI functions because as it is, Britain or the US do not have governments that will regulate AI to stay within the legal working day. People in the workforce will still be working beyond what on average is necessary for their reproduction.
Wow this is an awful report.
❤😮
Lmao
More and more US companies are leveraging AI than ever before haha
Ha Ha Ha
Awhat?
I a I a I a
I support the CCP! In their ongoing decision to allow Victor Gao to continue doing interviews so he can make a debacle of himself while telling China’s story so well. 🤦🤣
AI is a complete monster.
By the Time the world wakes up, We'll be completely enslaved by Machines & their will be no income left for man especially the Employee.
AI puts power back in the hands of the common man and whoever is the most creative. So they attack it, as to protect their market share. But… it cannot be stopped. The genie is out of the bottle and the old fat cats are about to lose everything.
Why would you hire someone who is creative if you can make a computer create the drawings, animations, music, etc? AI is a huge threat to anyone who is creative.
Ai is great. The source of truth. You got questions, Ai has your answers in the blink of an eye. Fact based
You need to study LLM’s and who creates them before you promote the safety of AI.
Am selling my expensive pen display drawing art tablet
If social elites and capable individuals view AI as an advanced assistant and gradually train it to become a user-friendly tool across all domains-both personal and professional-it can greatly enhance their ability to manage daily tasks and complex challenges. By fostering a collaborative relationship with AI-whose impact on modern life is comparable to that of cars-people can delegate routine tasks, allowing them to focus on more critical and creative aspects of their lives.
This gradual integration of AI into various facets of human life parallels how humans confront the anxiety of the unknown. Just as belief in "God's blessing" has historically provided individuals with reassurance and the strength to face challenges, the dependable support of AI can alleviate stress, enabling people to focus on solving the problems at hand. In both cases, the presence of a trusted ally-whether divine or technological-redirects attention from fear and uncertainty to productive problem-solving, ultimately leading to more effective outcomes.
However, the massive energy and freshwater consumption required for AI chip production, along with the resulting environmental pollution and degradation, are critical issues that society must carefully consider before advancing AI development on a global scale.