Thankyou so much sir. Proviso of clause i was not understandable to me now with the help of your lecture I 've completely understood it. Thanks Stay blessed always!
hello sir..im from pakistan..im listening ur lectures first time(pak and ind have same laws almost), nd u explained the law provision very briefly...thanks for this...
Sir thanku very much....agar aap videos nhe banate toh hum jese bache ko coaching afford nhe kr skte or jinhe college me ache teachers nhe mile h unka kya hota..... Thank you very much sir... And sir it's an humble request plz upload of all video of crpc ....it is in my semester exam....
Sir ,aap mains answer kase write karte hai , aap guide kar sakte hai, prelims main to koi problem nahi aa rahi hai, mains main effective answer writting kase llike , us pr please video banye
Well section 63 deals with the execution of decrees not decree , so it's clear that all claim from those decrees are settled by the highest court mentioned in this section , it also mean that decrees might be transfer to that highest court that's why he is hearing the objections from more than one decree holder
A sues B for Rs 5000. B owns a house worth Rs 5000 and has no other property. B may sell or mortgage the house notwithstanding institution of suit against him & he may sell or mortgage it even after decree has been passed against him,in suit? is sale or mortgage perfectly valid? please answer
He can't sale the house during the pendency of suit if the property is in question, and even he can sale or mortgage the property with permission as per rule 83 of order 21 but void if consent of the court was not obtained before sale
sir in sec 60 this expression has been used 'Provided that the following particulars shall not be liable to such attachment or sale one-third of the salary in execution of any decree for maintenance means 2/3 salary may be attached ?? you said 1/3 salary may be attachable, its confusion
That contract is good in law, and he has a ryt to move his representation in regard with his interest whenever court take action against that property. He also has a ryt to move an application to set aside the attachment.
As mention in the explanation of sec 40(i) that 12 months gap is applicable in case the salary is already attached for 24 months. Is this rule is applicable in all cases?? I mean if two degrees have to attach from the same salary then what should be the interval between the attachment of 2 decrees?? 12 months/ half of the time for which term one decree attached
Chhatradharilal Gangaram ... vs Shyamabai Ramsewaklal ... It may here be mentioned that under the Code of Civil Procedure, growing crops are moveable property: (see Section 2(13) of the Code of Civil Procedure). They shall, therefore, have to be specifically attached and sold as a piece of moveable property before the auction-purchaser could get any title to them.
Sir at 15.47 you have said that 1/3rd salary wife ko denge as maintenance but according to this section it is 1/3rd apne pas rakhenge to 2/3rd milega na wife ko to as maintenance.. please clarify
sir as s64(2) is a kind of exception to s64(1), so if a sale is made as per sec64(2),then what shall be the remedy available to decree holder against such sale?
Sir contracts before attachments is valid means contracts happened before filing of suits or contracts happened during the pendency of suit ,plz clarify
sirji is it right that compulsory deposits as long as they are in hands of trustees are not attachable, while as soon as they are in hands of employee become attachable? please answer
dear sir..i hv a doubt..in clause (ia) u said...wife ko salary ka 1/3 de denge..bt we readng exception..menzz 1/3 attach nhi karenge..maintenance ki decree mai 2/3 attach karenge..m i right..?
Plz always mentioned the rule where u have doubts, as Cpc is so wider and answers are varied according. So may I have the exact rule or time in vedio where u have such a doubt, thank you
A may move an application to attach his movable property but for that purpuse he has to satisfied the court that B only has car and no other property and the balance of convenience of this case is in his favour and if the case be decided in his favour then he would not get the fruit of the decree unless the car in possession of B be attached during trial.
Sir, sub section (2) of sec 63 states that nothing in sec 63 shall be deemed to invalidate any proceeding taken by a Court executing one of such decrees. Please explain this if possible. My doubt is that if the property is received or realised by the highest Court ( in case of difference of grade between such courts) or by the court under whose decree the property was first attached (in case of no difference in grade b/w the courts) then how come proceedings taken by a court executing one of such decrees shall be valid if property is under the custody of any of the above two courts (the court of highest grade or the court under whose decree the property was first attached) ? Jab property uss court ke paas hai hi nhi jo execution proceedings karne laga toh kaise woh proceeding valid hogi sir? Please do respond to my doubt.
Just that there are number of decree passed against the judgment debtor, can't stop the court to execute any decree, but it's distribution must be done by keeping the attachments of other decree..
Sir in Section 60 proviso it's mentioned that the house occupied by the person cannot be attached but in section 62 it's mentioned seizure of dwelling houses. How come both these provisions are in conflict?
Sir kya aap notes bhe provide krate h Sir mjhe crpc me reference ke liye chaiye kyuki mere paas book bhe nhe h or bare act bhe nhe h...bare act online available ho jata h ...pr bina book ke pdha he nhe jata sir... ... Plz help sir
Hello sir, I have filed an application of order 38 rule 5 against defendent. It's in court process but defendent is trying to sell off his said property. What relief can I get on that ?
Sir the way you have explained 60(i) is so so simple. Never seen such a lucid explanation before . Thank you
Great Lec sir 😃
Best cpc teacher on RUclips , thank you sir
Sardar ji nice video apki videos se muje kafi help mile hai thank you sir
Nice lecture sir thanku so much for your effort and support
Thanks sir ji. Salute hai apki mehnat ko.
Thankyou so much sir. Proviso of clause i was not understandable to me now with the help of your lecture I 've completely understood it. Thanks Stay blessed always!
Welcome g
Mr. Kahlon your teaching is the best on youtube
Thank u g
Sir you've made CPC so easy.
Thank you so much ❤️
Nice video sir ..... Aap k samjhane ka tarika bahut sahi hai .... Sir .
🙏🙏
Amazing lectures.🙏thank you for your efforts ,sir
Sir your teaching method is so good....thnks sir for heart
One of the most underrated channel ❤❤❤❤❤
Unique way of teaching, every point is clear in your videos, Sir .
But, please use collar mic of best quality.
Love from Pakistan 🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰
G
Best lectures in RUclips. Plz cover all subjects soon
Wow sir... Superb explanation 👌🙏
Awesome Teaching
Very good teaching sir.
hello sir..im from pakistan..im listening ur lectures first time(pak and ind have same laws almost), nd u explained the law provision very briefly...thanks for this...
Welcome g, and thank u for subscribing
Superb explanation sir
Sir please teach Transfer of property Act after finishing CPC. Thank you 🙏
Sir T.P.A. karwa hi do ab 📚
Thank you sir
Excellent Lecture 👌
Political pensions wala mast tha sir
The Best ! 🍬🍰
Make short videos if possible or in parts.
Thankyou 🙏🏻
Sure g
U r brilliant sir ji
Love u sir ji
Very nyc
The best 👍💯
Board is not clear shown ...nice lecture thank you it's helpful for us
Best sir
Sir thanku very much....agar aap videos nhe banate toh hum jese bache ko coaching afford nhe kr skte or jinhe college me ache teachers nhe mile h unka kya hota.....
Thank you very much sir...
And sir it's an humble request plz upload of all video of crpc ....it is in my semester exam....
Welcome g
Thanks a lot Sir🙏
Awesome sir
Good explanation but clause ia 2/3is attachable
Sardar sab thanks
Good lacture
Thanku sir for clearing doubts.
#law dronacharya
Along with lectures pls discuss case laws
Wah paa g sardar sardar h
Thank you so much sir😊
Sir please consider doing TP Act after this if possible sir. It is a technical subject and will be very useful for us. Thanks
Yes
👌👌👌
Sir , make video on Constitution , bcz it may be helpful for law students as well as people in general
Will do everything, don't worry
Thnku thnku
Great lecture sir❤
Salary attachable- is it calculated on basis of gross salary or net salary?
Net salary
Sir in case of maintenance 1/3 r
d of salary can not be attached and you said it can be attached basically 2/3rd of salary will be get attached.
👍👍
Sir ,aap mains answer kase write karte hai , aap guide kar sakte hai, prelims main to koi problem nahi aa rahi hai, mains main effective answer writting kase llike , us pr please video banye
In re s. 63 if the highest court will determine the objection what will happen to provision of transfer of decree?
Well section 63 deals with the execution of decrees not decree , so it's clear that all claim from those decrees are settled by the highest court mentioned in this section , it also mean that decrees might be transfer to that highest court that's why he is hearing the objections from more than one decree holder
please also make on sec 73
A sues B for Rs 5000. B owns a house worth Rs 5000 and has no other property. B may sell or mortgage the house notwithstanding institution of suit against him & he may sell or mortgage it even after decree has been passed against him,in suit? is sale or mortgage perfectly valid? please answer
He can't sale the house during the pendency of suit if the property is in question, and even he can sale or mortgage the property with permission as per rule 83 of order 21 but void if consent of the court was not obtained before sale
See section 52 of TPA
thank you
Thanks sr
sir in sec 60 this expression has been used 'Provided that the following particulars shall not be liable to such attachment or sale one-third of the salary in execution of any decree for maintenance means 2/3 salary may be attached ?? you said 1/3 salary may be attachable, its confusion
Under sec64...if attachment s phle contract hue h ...so after attachment ky sale ho skte h ..us bande ko jisse contract hue thi
That contract is good in law, and he has a ryt to move his representation in regard with his interest whenever court take action against that property. He also has a ryt to move an application to set aside the attachment.
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Ty Sir..
As mention in the explanation of sec 40(i) that 12 months gap is applicable in case the salary is already attached for 24 months. Is this rule is applicable in all cases??
I mean if two degrees have to attach from the same salary then what should be the interval between the attachment of 2 decrees?? 12 months/ half of the time for which term one decree attached
✌✌
Sir please also explain the explanation to these section also
In CPC book crops selling are mention Or not
Chhatradharilal Gangaram ... vs Shyamabai Ramsewaklal ...
It may here be mentioned that under the Code of Civil Procedure, growing crops are moveable property: (see Section 2(13) of the Code of Civil Procedure). They shall, therefore, have to be specifically attached and sold as a piece of moveable property before the auction-purchaser could get any title to them.
Sir at 15.47 you have said that 1/3rd salary wife ko denge as maintenance but according to this section it is 1/3rd apne pas rakhenge to 2/3rd milega na wife ko to as maintenance.. please clarify
good lectures but lectures in English also desireble
sir as s64(2) is a kind of exception to s64(1), so if a sale is made as per sec64(2),then what shall be the remedy available to decree holder against such sale?
Sir contracts before attachments is valid means contracts happened before filing of suits or contracts happened during the pendency of suit ,plz clarify
sirji is it right that compulsory deposits as long as they are in hands of trustees are not attachable, while as soon as they are in hands of employee become attachable? please answer
dear sir..i hv a doubt..in clause (ia) u said...wife ko salary ka 1/3 de denge..bt we readng exception..menzz 1/3 attach nhi karenge..maintenance ki decree mai 2/3 attach karenge..m i right..?
Plz watch the vedio again, I have discussed in detail and also gave examples
✌️✌️✌️✌️
Sir i have a doubt , The party claiming for the property in different court is the same party or a different party
Plz always mentioned the rule where u have doubts, as Cpc is so wider and answers are varied according. So may I have the exact rule or time in vedio where u have such a doubt, thank you
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 under sec 63
Different parties having decree against same judgment debtor
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 ok thnk you sir
"A" file Money suit against "B" (having a car only).
Now "B" is trying to sale his car.
What relief have now for "A".....?
?
A may move an application to attach his movable property but for that purpuse he has to satisfied the court that B only has car and no other property and the balance of convenience of this case is in his favour and if the case be decided in his favour then he would not get the fruit of the decree unless the car in possession of B be attached during trial.
Or he can take a stay against B that not to sale the car to any person without the permission of court
In case of a Cheque case
Can "A" take stay on the car of "B"......?
He has a right, I think he has to move an application
Sir, sub section (2) of sec 63 states that nothing in sec 63 shall be deemed to invalidate any proceeding taken by a Court executing one of such decrees. Please explain this if possible.
My doubt is that if the property is received or realised by the highest Court ( in case of difference of grade between such courts) or by the court under whose decree the property was first attached (in case of no difference in grade b/w the courts) then how come proceedings taken by a court executing one of such decrees shall be valid if property is under the custody of any of the above two courts (the court of highest grade or the court under whose decree the property was first attached) ?
Jab property uss court ke paas hai hi nhi jo execution proceedings karne laga toh kaise woh proceeding valid hogi sir? Please do respond to my doubt.
Just that there are number of decree passed against the judgment debtor, can't stop the court to execute any decree, but it's distribution must be done by keeping the attachments of other decree..
Thank you Sir. 😊
Sir aap kounse book se padhate hai
I referred many books
22:03 section 61
Sir can you please explain the explanation part of section 63
Sir in Section 60 proviso it's mentioned that the house occupied by the person cannot be attached but in section 62 it's mentioned seizure of dwelling houses. How come both these provisions are in conflict?
Only the house of servant ,agriculturist or labourer can't be attached under sec 60 can't be attached
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Thank you Sir ji 🙏
Sir plz 63(2) n explanation 🙏🏻
sir (ia) 1/3 attachment hoga ya nhi
Sir section 60(2) says what?
sir, please explain explanation of section 63
Sir ji my qeus if a decree passed in favour of minor suing as an adult pl give ans decree is validated or not
If it is on merit basis then definitely it's valid
Sir kya aap notes bhe provide krate h
Sir mjhe crpc me reference ke liye chaiye kyuki mere paas book bhe nhe h or bare act bhe nhe h...bare act online available ho jata h ...pr bina book ke pdha he nhe jata sir... ... Plz help sir
Sir kindly sec 69 of koi tenancy act 2014
Clause I ka proviso clear karo sir
Sir section 64 ka explanation smj nhi aya
Hello sir, I have filed an application of order 38 rule 5 against defendent. It's in court process but defendent is trying to sell off his said property. What relief can I get on that ?