the last line was gold - "people who themselves have not created new things from scratch seem to feel this way the most" - who are those? Most left leaning activists and big gov advocates who seem to think distribution is the problem to solve
Except copper, if you are talking about terrestrial resources, there will be a crunch there as EVs and robot production consumes huge amounts of it. Perhaps we will get over that by tapping into off world sources and it is just a question of where the two graph lines cross over, the minima that describes the worst supply vs demand ratio at some point in the near future. The CRT example doesn't fit well with the need to have affordable room temperature conductors of low resistance. At some point our creativity will allow us to use particular configurations of graphene nanoribbons to get around that need for copper but by then we will probably be well advance with our exploitation of extraterrestrial resources. So while it is true that we can invent our way out of any constraint there will be difficult days at times until we succeed. And don't discount human stupidity and greed either, good ideas are sometimes suppressed because they threaten someone's business model.
I disagree as natural ecosystems are not infinite. The Human effect is certainly depleting natural ecosystems. Eg look at the rate of species extinction where humans start to develop.
His point is that you dont need only one kind of resource to do something, there are always other resources you can switch to do the same thing if you are creative enough to explore
Past tech development does not have any bearing on possibility of future tech development. This is the silliest, most childish kind of Hope-timism. "Tech-development possibility is infinite." No, there is nothing infinite about it. In time, limits set in. There is peak development. The end of human creativity? No. Then creativity moves beyond these physical technologies, abandons them in fact.
Loved the connection to human creativity at the end
While talking about creativity as solution/ option,we get a beautiful by- product : hope 😀
the last line was gold - "people who themselves have not created new things from scratch seem to feel this way the most" - who are those? Most left leaning activists and big gov advocates who seem to think distribution is the problem to solve
Thank you
God I miss my cathode ray tube.
Funny you should mention that, the YT channel 'Vintage Computer Federation" released a video only a few hours ago called "CRT Repair"
here in my garage...
Except copper, if you are talking about terrestrial resources, there will be a crunch there as EVs and robot production consumes huge amounts of it. Perhaps we will get over that by tapping into off world sources and it is just a question of where the two graph lines cross over, the minima that describes the worst supply vs demand ratio at some point in the near future. The CRT example doesn't fit well with the need to have affordable room temperature conductors of low resistance. At some point our creativity will allow us to use particular configurations of graphene nanoribbons to get around that need for copper but by then we will probably be well advance with our exploitation of extraterrestrial resources. So while it is true that we can invent our way out of any constraint there will be difficult days at times until we succeed. And don't discount human stupidity and greed either, good ideas are sometimes suppressed because they threaten someone's business model.
Sir how acquire right knowledge and how to implement it in real life...
Who is the guest here?
Brett Hall: ruclips.net/video/kXly_Zz4MTI/видео.html
Take your guess
Can you explain Hindi
I disagree as natural ecosystems are not infinite. The Human effect is certainly depleting natural ecosystems. Eg look at the rate of species extinction where humans start to develop.
His point is that you dont need only one kind of resource to do something, there are always other resources you can switch to do the same thing if you are creative enough to explore
@@ShivamGupta-wn1zc my point is i dont agree and i gave an example why i dont agree.
@@SHANONisRegenerate my point is that you are disagreeing with something that he has not even said.
@@ShivamGupta-wn1zc do you realize a natural ecosystem is a resource
@@SHANONisRegenerate Listen to video, europium is finite resource too and yet we haven't run out of red color. That's the point.
Past tech development does not have any bearing on possibility of future tech development. This is the silliest, most childish kind of Hope-timism. "Tech-development possibility is infinite." No, there is nothing infinite about it. In time, limits set in. There is peak development. The end of human creativity? No. Then creativity moves beyond these physical technologies, abandons them in fact.