Stanford CS109 Probability for Computer Scientists I Continuous Random Variables I 2022 I Lecture 9

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 фев 2025

Комментарии • 16

  • @ananth2006
    @ananth2006 Месяц назад

    Chris Piech is a gem of a person and a professor, so inspiring!

  • @TheHighestStateOfPotatoChips
    @TheHighestStateOfPotatoChips 5 месяцев назад +3

    I like that he makes mistakes and it shows the thinking process to get to the correct solution.

    • @georgevonfloydmann1797
      @georgevonfloydmann1797 8 дней назад

      Yeah that differs so much from how teachers in my uni tend to teach. They just read from paper and that is it lol. Like is this an education or a meaningless muttering session😂

  • @w7geek
    @w7geek 7 месяцев назад +2

    Great lectures by an even greater person!

  • @IntrepidLlama123
    @IntrepidLlama123 6 месяцев назад +3

    Legendary lectures! Thank you so much!

  • @sarahsalt3689
    @sarahsalt3689 Год назад +7

    Awesome resource, thank you!

  • @hariprasath7050
    @hariprasath7050 5 месяцев назад +2

    He's great professor I ever seen in my life it is very sad to hear he can't see with left eyes I don't know why always nature punish good person instead of bad person I hope he can recover or at least he can prevent disease to spread right eye I really thank to him when I started to learn Probability, I can't even understand single topics I'm continuously tried to find some resources online that make probability to understand easier way and finally I got frustration even I studied Statistics book on my own I can able to understand but probability always confuse me lastly I found the great professor Chris he's literally god for me I know how difficult the subject Probability but he broke that difficulty explained in a simplest way to understand thanks a lot.

  • @JohnCena-o3p
    @JohnCena-o3p Год назад +2

    I was curious so I wrote some Java code (RE: the bitcoin problem) and the two students' approaches do indeed come out to the same thing (+/- 1.3e-18). I'd post a link to the pastebin with the code but that gets the comment instantly deleted.

  • @kaloca
    @kaloca Год назад +1

    谢谢。我很喜欢看这节课!

    • @Lee-zo3dy
      @Lee-zo3dy 8 месяцев назад

      Chinese?

  • @vinayak3751
    @vinayak3751 6 месяцев назад +1

    respect

  • @shubhamroy5704
    @shubhamroy5704 11 месяцев назад

    E(x) of uni distribution is a typographic error.

  • @allantourin
    @allantourin Год назад +2

    One cannot avoid integrals

  • @suchalooser1175
    @suchalooser1175 Год назад +2

    awesome!