I commend ur resolve. Not for the knowledge being shared or for the efforts you take to make the videos. But for the fact that large majority in the comments fail to engage in any meaningful way, remaining in denial and within their false bubbles yet you persevere. Keep going, I am not a traditional student of Science but very fascinated by it and find your videos really helpful for a noob like me!
@Taimur_Laal evidence koi chupi hui Cheez Nahin. Evolution ke khilaf bhi to evidence Hain. Agar AAP smjhte Hain ke AAP ke evidence ziyada qavi Hain to khul ke debate Karen Jo completely peaceful ho ta ke hum bhi Jan saken ke dalail Kis ke pass ziyada qavi Hain. Magar maqsad sirf sahi ilm hasil Karna ho.
Knowledge , thoughts and changes occured in 3700 yearz summarised in 37 Minutes. This is amazingly brilliant This and such other videos based factual Knowledge be shared with all schools, colleges and universities as they still live in stone age Keep smiling and shining 🎉🎉❤
Nature is not just material or materialistic, it's beyond our understanding. Philosophy of the metaphysical realm is secondary job. Primary task is Asim Munir. 🤗
I usually watch your lectures sir but this one touched my heart. A very well-researched, mind blowing, and comprehensive lecture on the topic - indeed all your videos are. Keep guiding us, sir! Stay blessed!
بہت مزا آیا بہت بہت شکریہ آپ سے التجا ہے کہ کن کن سائنسدانوں کا قتل ہوا تھا اس پر بھی ایک ویڈیو ضرور بنائیں جیسا کی اپنے ذکر کیا Thank you once again ❤
The Quran touches upon the concept of the universe and its expansion in several verses. One of the most frequently cited verses in this context is from Surah Adh-Dhariyat (51:47), which states
Respected Professor, I am admirer of your lectures. Only for information, Books of Dr Bashir Uddin Mehmood and Istanbul School of English on RUclips are worth reading and watching. Both are crystal clear explanations of Islam. Thanks for Educating.
Kab tak logo ke modon pe ralh ke bandook chalao gy me Lord…. Just accept and be brave …… You have all options to move out of hell and enlighten so many more with more clarity.. still love you what you do
With ease and fluency you have explained dialectics of nature. Of course nature is changeable and human nature can also be changeable. By the change of mode of the production human nature can be changed. Cultural Marxist particularly the Frankfurt school of thought deliberately misinterpreted the Marxism and devirt the attention of the Marxism towards culture Marxism and laid down the foundation of anti- Marxism. Your lecture opens the vistas about true Marxism. The crux of the argument is without atheist worldview someone cannot seem to grasp and discern the true spirit of Marxism.
Have you gone through Mulla Sadra's philisophy of Intrinsic Mobility حرکت جوھری? I feel your talk has to be comprehensive by mentioning this. I like your talks. Best of luck.
Thanks but i do request to kindly study deeply the philosophy of Sri Aurobindo , his innovative ideas on evolution of divine life ,mind overmind and supermind etc to feel the pulse and spirit of Indian Upanishadas overmind
@@deebaparveen6010 I can't go around chasing, cross checking, examining and evaluating every reference and hint people drop or mention in their comments, it's on you to provide a brief description of your claim along with details of the reference, so one can decide if it's worth the hassle to investigate any further. So, please state what it says or I would have to assume that you yourself don't know anything about it.
I think the terms "spiritual", "spiritualism", "spirituality" of Henry George would better fit and explain the point you wish to make instead of "divinity" or "divine".
Nature/Cosmos is naturally way beyond material (solid, gas, liquid, plasma). Not to say angles, sky and underwater realm points towards light orbs, ETs, aliens comrades.
1. Wese main ap ki kisi point se agree nai but ager man ly sub change ho raha he to ye changle ki ability universe main kese ai? 2. kia camra ki ijad k bad Species change hona band ho gai ? (ab ye ne kehna k is main time lagta ager lagta he to kitna lagta he is ka mtlb her time change he to ab bhi ho raha ho ga change ager ye bat bhi man ly to is se y ho ga k koi Species prfect ni hoi chay mtlb koi monky half monky hona chahy or half human ya half se ziyda ya kam bhi ho skta q k wo aik change k process main he na k just monkey balky sb Species hi adhi adhuri to honi change ho q k ager time lagta he to fish se start krty he wo abhi fish he kuch to tume guzra ho ga us ka or kitna time lagy ga ye kon decide kry ga) 3. wese koi exempl to ap ko bhi deni chay with evidence k kon Species abhi abhi change ho rhi kisi dosri Species main. 4. Ager koi keh dy kabhi kuch bhi change ho skta he or wo God ki trf se ho skta but bhi ap physics law main change ni mano gy kaho gy jese law usi trah hi ga but kis physics k law create kiy? 5. ager her cheez k pichy cuse he to nature kis ne create ki or ager khud hoi to kia cause he? 1st step se batana. 6. ye kese man ly k science abhi sb sahi bata rhi he or wo bina evidence like Big Bang where is the evidence no body can prove this. 7. science k pass boht c baton k jawbat ni kab se science ho rhi ger hoty to abi tk ap unhi pornai debate main na phase hoty like start kese hova? 8.aik bachon wali kahani suna di jati je k africa k log black q un hight ziyda q and chineds ya west main log white q ya hight kam k african k hisab se to ye dekho evolution sabit ho but bhai jan kia wo africa k log insan se kuch or bna gay hain ya chainge kuch bn gay hain insan hi hian or ager ye kaha jay hum is ly kisi Specie ko kisi dosri Specie main change hoty nai dikha skty q k time lagta he but ye color change hight change to 2nd 3rd main bhi show ho jata he ager koi african kisi chines se shadi kry to next gen hi change ho jay gi. 9. kaha jata he k human k DNA monky se 90% ya is ziyda match hoty hain to phir to sy sb Species aik hi Specie se hain to sb k match hony chay? !0. 1st cell kese bana? Abhi boht kuch he likhny ko but man thak gaya bhchon wali kahinya chory dy Lalal Sb
Ager in basice questions k answer hoty to bhai ye debate hi khatam ho jati wo question wese k wese hi hain koi prove bhi day diya kro jub kisi book main kisi kuch likh deny se answer nai samj lety
@@myslantyar ap ko ja kar evolution ke bare mein proper biologists ke lecture sunane chahiye kiun ke bhai ap ke first almost sare questions ke answer diye ja chuke hein
Metaphysics obviously takes us beyond physical world. What's beyond that transcends us? Did Marx explore this world? No! Why? His belief in making this PHYSICAL universe better for humans was unparalleled.
Aggar science main taraqi krni hai to uskalia mazhab side py rakh k . rational mind sa sochna zruri ha. Mazhab ki ainak lga k ham science ko kabhi nhe samjh sakty
No not at all, physical description never negates metaphysicality Sir you have described physical enitieies and laws rather metaphysical Decort physical and metaphysical principles are much different sir You ate not new one just confusing commeners sir 😊
Physicists do more of mathematics than philosophy!That too when they're religious (spiritualists). This is paradoxical and problematic that needs proper diagnosis, understanding and solution. Mathematics follows a set childish logic. Philospphy follows dialectic-logic, if at all philosophy is truly interested in pursuing truth.
What truth, the one you yourself concocted, brainwashed into, or chose to believe without evidence? And what method do you suggest to find and verify that so-called personal unverified and unverifiable truth? Please enlighten us all.
@@adeelarshadwattoo8584 Either you got it from a book or from a person who read it in a book, at the end it's still a book written by someone who coined this concept, unless you coined it yourself.
Dear heart is just a pumping organ and nothing else,this biological interpretation of your divine scriptures is wrong,it was actually Aristotelian biological concept which is rejected by today modern biological understanding
Philosophers and others including ourselves should not use the terms "nature", "universe" , "cosmos" etc. loosely and interchangeably. Then Allah-tala and God can't be explained. Nomenclature task leads us to confusion and violence.
Absolutely right. Actually spirituality can not be explained in words or this language there is no language for that , that only need heart listening to understand spiritual or divine knowledge or or divine guidance about actual world or what is purpose of life .
I have listened the whole lecture and can't understand what was the purpose of this effort. So the philosophers in the past made an error on a " minor detail" like you said regarding neo darwinism in response to denise nobel interview recently. " So what , minor errors doesn't refute anything". are you trying to make a case that the science couldn't have grown so far unless platonic teachings were debunked ? So what , human being were still engaging in science to an extent like ever . It was not the case where human race could have wiped out because of platonic teachings / philosophy. Materialistic approach or materialization of science has also draw backs hindering the growth of science . Please watch dr. Rupert Sheldrake's work regarding how science is broken. Furthermore, it seems you imply that human race as some kind of obligation to grow science particularly science of this era . How did you get there ? Can't we sacrifice the modern science for greater good ? You can change everything as long as it doesn't hurt THE PURPOSE OF EXISTENCE OF MANKIND i.e submission to the God .
If teleology (final cause, fixed purpose) is given, i e. Nature/Cosmos/Universe just EXISTS 'per se' then... --hello Big Bang Theorists, kindly pay attention to Aristotle!
@@Taimur_LaalRight, if universe has no teleology, then does it have ontology --principle of being/ coming into being like ontology of say labor? Second, aren't physicists on the wrong path in so far as they strive after the "ORIGIN" of the universe? On lighter note, just because they're being paid salaries and perks and allowances so they're at leisure to invent any problem falling and rising in the realm of vague amorphous "origin"?
Qaisar raja seems to have made you mad so instead of focusing on economics which is your subject you are confused and making your followers focused on such topics. Anyway, after AI what is left to you professors to tell the students.
In this 37:17 video not a single word is confusing but to understand it needs some I Q level which is beyond the capacity of followers of Qaiser Raja who is living in medieval era
Please keep doing what you're doing, Prof. But organically. Please don't get into a dialectic with the not-so-grand inquisitors of Pakistan, who are trying to make common cause to try to bait you into debate. Sincerely, Random online admirer.
Yahan ap ny aik bohot achi mistake ki hy. Religious people evolution ky against nahi hain. Evolution natural process hy. Religious figures natural selection as a matter of randomness and 1 universal ancestor ky against hain. Aik ideology ky aik part ko reject karny sy zaroori nahi puri ideology hi reject ho jai.
@@muneebrehman95 mistake nahin hai. It is only after 150 years of scientific advance on evolution that they are now ready to concede just a little space to evolution.
@Taimur_Laal so they accept it right. Do evolution (excluding the randomness aspect), go against Islamic base believes established in Quran and Hadith ( part of Islam which Muslims believe as absolute fact )?
@Taimur_Laal i do agree that they did not accept at first. It was for the political reasons. Just for an example in south asia, some of the islamic schools rejected British and everything that British taught. According to book I read the history of Muslim education system in Hindustan by Molana Sayed Munazir Ahsan Gilani.
❤❤❤🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Lobe to see such a intellectual like TAIMUR LAL in Pakistan..... I could not imagine that people like you does exist in such a religious extremist country.
Professor of history talking on biological science. Even he doesn't have an understanding of own subject. How will he talk about this biological science. Ya wrong number hai.
@Taimur_Laal School-level knowledge provides only a basic foundation, which is essential but far from exhaustive. Even textbooks acknowledge that certain subjects, like the theory of evolution, are still evolving and not fully conclusive. While history students may consider such material a complete study, in the realm of science, it’s essential to view these concepts as part of an ongoing investigation rather than a finished narrative. Scientists continuously refine and expand upon these theories. Limitations of Darwinism: Lack of Genetic Basis: Darwin’s original theory lacked knowledge of heredity and genetics. He proposed "blending inheritance," which contradicted his ideas of variation and natural selection. Mechanism of Variation: Darwin could not explain how new variations arise or are preserved. Complexity of Traits: Evolutionary changes in complex traits and behaviors couldn't be entirely explained by gradualism. Fossil Record Gaps: Critics argue that the fossil record does not always show gradual transitions between species, as Darwin predicted. Cooperation vs. Competition: Darwin emphasized competition but underestimated the role of cooperation and mutualism in evolution. Limitations of Neo-Darwinism: Overemphasis on Mutation: Neo-Darwinism places heavy reliance on mutations as the primary source of variation, neglecting other mechanisms like epigenetics and horizontal gene transfer. Role of Environment: It underestimates the impact of environmental factors in shaping evolution through phenotypic plasticity. Gradualism Questioned: Evidence from punctuated equilibrium suggests that evolution may proceed in rapid bursts rather than slow, steady changes. Emerging Complexity: It struggles to explain the origin of complex molecular systems and pathways (e.g., the evolution of the eye). Epigenetics: Modern studies show that heritable changes can occur without alterations in DNA sequences, challenging traditional genetic views. Non-Adaptive Traits: Neo-Darwinism fails to address traits that do not appear to provide a survival advantage but persist nonetheless. So it is better to don't mislead students. Better to concentrate on your subject.
@@Faqr-e-Ghayoorevolution (and speciation ) has been proven beyond doubt. Molvis need to catch up. Grow up . The world has moved on / nobody takes you ID guys seriously anywhere.
@Taimur_Laal School-level knowledge provides only a basic foundation, which is essential but far from exhaustive. Even textbooks acknowledge that certain subjects, like the theory of evolution, are still evolving and not fully conclusive. While history students may consider such material a complete study, in the realm of science, it’s essential to view these concepts as part of an ongoing investigation rather than a finished narrative. Scientists continuously refine and expand upon these theories. Darwin’s original theory lacked knowledge of heredity and genetics. He proposed "blending inheritance," which contradicted his ideas of variation and natural selection. Darwin could not explain how new variations arise or are preserved. Evolutionary changes in complex traits and behaviors couldn't be entirely explained by gradualism. Scientists argue that the fossil record does not always show gradual transitions between species, as Darwin predicted. Darwin emphasized competition but underestimated the role of cooperation and mutualism in evolution. Neo-Darwinism places heavy reliance on mutations as the primary source of variation, neglecting other mechanisms like epigenetics and horizontal gene transfer. It underestimates the impact of environmental factors in shaping evolution through phenotypic plasticity. Evidence from punctuated equilibrium suggests that evolution may proceed in rapid bursts rather than slow, steady changes. It struggles to explain the origin of complex molecular systems and pathways (e.g., the evolution of the eye). Modern studies show that heritable changes can occur without alterations in DNA sequences, challenging traditional genetic views. Neo-Darwinism fails to address traits that do not appear to provide a survival advantage but persist nonetheless. Don't delete this comment...
Mirza Ghalib was better scientist than our modern physicists. Surely a better philosopher. See this: "Jab ye jahan na thha to khuda tu thha"! Something...something. What's God? Our idea! Within that idea, something inexplicable! Utmost honesty! Ghalib meant to say, God/Idea/Universe is INEXPLICABLE to HUMAN MIND. That's the wisdom. His wisdom! Why can't physicists understand this little udea that we can't understand and know this observable universe! Scientists instead of getting reigned in, got more obstinate like obstibate boy Zelensky who keeps on craving for toy guns: We wanna see more universes, multi-universes! One Big Bang was beyond our handling, we posited multi-universes!! Why? Because salary is fixed! Perks given! Allowances and DA fixed! Rather DA increasing! 😂. So, take a paper pad, a pencil, sit on sofa ....start hallucinating about any abstract theory! There are over 100 versions of Quantum Nechanics/Theory! There's big scam of scienticism! 😂😂
Does GOD is binded by hos own plan??? Does HIS will also bound as per law of physics/gravity/ time n space ??? It's we humans are reluctant to such fixed patterns of universal laws. It's we who are prisoners of Past, Present ,Future ,Time and space .
Aggar science main taraqi krni hai to uskalia mazhab side py rakh k . rational mind sa sochna zruri ha. Mazhab ki ainak lga k ham science ko kabhi nhe samjh sakty
I commend ur resolve. Not for the knowledge being shared or for the efforts you take to make the videos. But for the fact that large majority in the comments fail to engage in any meaningful way, remaining in denial and within their false bubbles yet you persevere. Keep going, I am not a traditional student of Science but very fascinated by it and find your videos really helpful for a noob like me!
@@Waqas-Umer thank you. 🙏
I feel that myself so many times.
Khali bataen na Karen. Sir ko chahiye ke kissi ache wale alum E Deen se peacefully online debate Karen. Tab hi hum koii sahi Faisal kar sake gen.
@ matlab you can’t make up your mind by examining the evidence? Hmmmm
@Taimur_Laal evidence koi chupi hui Cheez Nahin. Evolution ke khilaf bhi to evidence Hain. Agar AAP smjhte Hain ke AAP ke evidence ziyada qavi Hain to khul ke debate Karen Jo completely peaceful ho ta ke hum bhi Jan saken ke dalail Kis ke pass ziyada qavi Hain.
Magar maqsad sirf sahi ilm hasil Karna ho.
Scholars like you are laying the foundation of Renaissance in the Muslim world. Thank You!
Knowledge , thoughts and changes occured in 3700 yearz summarised in 37 Minutes. This is amazingly brilliant
This and such other videos based factual Knowledge be shared with all schools, colleges and universities as they still live in stone age
Keep smiling and shining 🎉🎉❤
Nature is not just material or materialistic, it's beyond our understanding. Philosophy of the metaphysical realm is secondary job. Primary task is Asim Munir. 🤗
VIRTUAL vigo is coming for you😆
LoL
Black vigo is comming 🤣😂😂👌
@@sapien307Digital arrest 😄
Sir , You explained this difficult , mysterious and complex philosophical paradigm in a very simplistic way , Thanks & stay blessed
Very nice lecture. Acceptance of truth with proof is the way forward.
Excellent ! A great pleasure to listen to the video. Contains the summary of the history of intellectual activities of mankind.
I usually watch your lectures sir but this one touched my heart. A very well-researched, mind blowing, and comprehensive lecture on the topic - indeed all your videos are.
Keep guiding us, sir!
Stay blessed!
Bohat hi umda video jitni bhi tareef ki jae kum ha
Please share as much as possible.
@@Taimur_Laal yes sir i am keep sharing your informative videos and i will for sure
ਵਿਦਵਾਨ ਰੱਬ, ਅੱਲ੍ਹਾ, ਗੌਡ, ਈਸ਼ਵਰ ਆਦਿ ਐਵੇਂ ਘਸੋੜੀ ਜਾ ਰਿਹਾ ਹੈ, ਪਲੈਟੋ ਦੀ ਸੋਚ ਦੇ ਸਹਾਰੇ ਅਸੀ ਵਿਗਿਆਨ ਤੋਂ ਮੂੰਹ ਮੋੜ ਰਹੇ ਹਾਂ। ਇਸ ਨੂੰ ਚਾਰਲਸ ਡਾਰਵਿਨ ਨੂੰ ਪੜ੍ਹ ਲੈਣਾ ਚਾਹੀਦਾ ਹੈ।
Google translator translates your last sentence as, "he should read Charles Darwin", is that what you mean?
بہت مزا آیا
بہت بہت شکریہ
آپ سے التجا ہے کہ کن کن سائنسدانوں کا قتل ہوا تھا اس پر بھی ایک ویڈیو ضرور بنائیں جیسا کی اپنے ذکر کیا
Thank you once again ❤
As always thanks sir🎉🎉
نہایت عمدہ کام کر رہے ہیں آپ ❤
Explained in super simple words 🎉
Thanks Sir, inlighting us and lecture provide us fruit for thought
Such an informative video! We need more critical minds like you.
The Quran touches upon the concept of the universe and its expansion in several verses. One of the most frequently cited verses in this context is from Surah Adh-Dhariyat (51:47), which states
Respected Professor, I am admirer of your lectures. Only for information, Books of Dr Bashir Uddin Mehmood and Istanbul School of English on RUclips are worth reading and watching. Both are crystal clear explanations of Islam. Thanks for Educating.
Bashiruddin hahaha? Woh jinnon se bijli bananay wala???
Lot of thanks for valuable content to
Change our old mentality
#Sir Taimur Lal Sahab u brilliant 😊
Please one lecture on Iqbal's philosophy 🙏
Good lecture 👍
Great knowledgeable video, keep it up and enlightened us❤
Kab tak logo ke modon pe ralh ke bandook chalao gy me Lord…. Just accept and be brave …… You have all options to move out of hell and enlighten so many more with more clarity.. still love you what you do
Excellent talk
love you for this evolution series ❤❤❤❤
Keep fighting the ignorance,we are with you.✊🏼
With ease and fluency you have explained dialectics of nature. Of course nature is changeable and human nature can also be changeable. By the change of mode of the production human nature can be changed. Cultural Marxist particularly the Frankfurt school of thought deliberately misinterpreted the Marxism and devirt the attention of the Marxism towards culture Marxism and laid down the foundation of anti- Marxism. Your lecture opens the vistas about true Marxism. The crux of the argument is without atheist worldview someone cannot seem to grasp and discern the true spirit of Marxism.
Have you gone through Mulla Sadra's philisophy of Intrinsic Mobility حرکت جوھری?
I feel your talk has to be comprehensive by mentioning this.
I like your talks. Best of luck.
Mulla sadra AAP Ki soch se bhi aage hain
Means Tabdeli agyei nahi Tabdili shuru sa chall rehi ha..😮
Sir apsay parhnay walay philosophy k students lucky hon gain. Govt schools ko sehi krnay main kuch karain
I have request. Could you please make a lecture on posthumanism and its idea of human and also the renewed understanding of human and nature
Beautiful
Is there an English version of this lecture? Greetings from Senegal 🇸🇳
Sir one lecture on " is philosophy relevant in present times and in future " or "The role of philosophy in present times and future "...
Thanks but i do request to kindly study deeply the philosophy of Sri Aurobindo , his innovative ideas on evolution of divine life ,mind overmind and supermind etc to feel the pulse and spirit of Indian Upanishadas overmind
Sura Rehman 55:49
Is asking us this theory
What does it say?
@ you can see in Quran please
@@deebaparveen6010
I can't go around chasing, cross checking, examining and evaluating every reference and hint people drop or mention in their comments, it's on you to provide a brief description of your claim along with details of the reference, so one can decide if it's worth the hassle to investigate any further.
So, please state what it says or I would have to assume that you yourself don't know anything about it.
Dr.Taimur, why not you kindly join 'ResearchGate' and 'Academia' social networking sites for intellectual connectedness?
Very well done amazing impressive information great job 👏🏼
Absolute agree
I think the terms "spiritual", "spiritualism", "spirituality" of Henry George would better fit and explain the point you wish to make instead of "divinity" or "divine".
Question : What is energy (define)?
Answer: Energy is of several types!
...
That's an example of escapism & incompetence! 😊
As if you know what energy is. 😂
@@arifsaleem5467No one knows but everyone uses this term.
Sir agr har cheese change or evolute krti ha to qaisar Raja ki evolution kio ni hoti?
Har 🧀 change aur evolute nahin karti 😂
@@HarisA1i some things take longer to change :)
@@Taimur_Laal Waah sir kia baat kee hai app nai♥️♥️♥️♥️😍😍
Does our thinking and way of thinking affects/dusturbs inanimate lifeless matter?
Lal salam❤❤❤❤
Debate Qaiser Ahmad Raja
Why should Taimur waste his time with that fool 😂
@heartfeltteaching what's foolish in doing a debate. Come man up!
Cancer Raja the famous biologist, AKA. famous bullshitiologist.
Sir you have to relax some second in your sentence it will be more interested and easy to lesson.
Nature/Cosmos is naturally way beyond material (solid, gas, liquid, plasma). Not to say angles, sky and underwater realm points towards light orbs, ETs, aliens comrades.
Even the Concept of God is in evolution.
Today i think Hardly an individual believe that God order him to sacrifice his beloved son for.HIS happiness
Wow
1. Wese main ap ki kisi point se agree nai but ager man ly sub change ho raha he to ye changle ki ability universe main kese ai?
2. kia camra ki ijad k bad Species change hona band ho gai ? (ab ye ne kehna k is main time lagta ager lagta he to kitna lagta he is ka mtlb her time change he to ab bhi ho raha ho ga change ager ye bat bhi man ly to is se y ho ga k koi Species prfect ni hoi chay mtlb koi monky half monky hona chahy or half human ya half se ziyda ya kam bhi ho skta q k wo aik change k process main he na k just monkey balky sb Species hi adhi adhuri to honi change ho q k ager time lagta he to fish se start krty he wo abhi fish he kuch to tume guzra ho ga us ka or kitna time lagy ga ye kon decide kry ga)
3. wese koi exempl to ap ko bhi deni chay with evidence k kon Species abhi abhi change ho rhi kisi dosri Species main.
4. Ager koi keh dy kabhi kuch bhi change ho skta he or wo God ki trf se ho skta but bhi ap physics law main change ni mano gy kaho gy jese law usi trah hi ga but kis physics k law create kiy?
5. ager her cheez k pichy cuse he to nature kis ne create ki or ager khud hoi to kia cause he? 1st step se batana.
6. ye kese man ly k science abhi sb sahi bata rhi he or wo bina evidence like Big Bang where is the evidence no body can prove this.
7. science k pass boht c baton k jawbat ni kab se science ho rhi ger hoty to abi tk ap unhi pornai debate main na phase hoty like start kese hova?
8.aik bachon wali kahani suna di jati je k africa k log black q un hight ziyda q and chineds ya west main log white q ya hight kam k african k hisab se to ye dekho evolution sabit ho but bhai jan kia wo africa k log insan se kuch or bna gay hain ya chainge kuch bn gay hain insan hi hian or ager ye kaha jay hum is ly kisi Specie ko kisi dosri Specie main change hoty nai dikha skty q k time lagta he but ye color change hight change to 2nd 3rd main bhi show ho jata he ager koi african kisi chines se shadi kry to next gen hi change ho jay gi.
9. kaha jata he k human k DNA monky se 90% ya is ziyda match hoty hain to phir to sy sb Species aik hi Specie se hain to sb k match hony chay?
!0. 1st cell kese bana?
Abhi boht kuch he likhny ko but man thak gaya bhchon wali kahinya chory dy Lalal Sb
Oh bhai koi kitab parh le. Apni taraf se Philosoper banay hwy ho. These are basic questions. Read a book before trying to appear smart
@@Theriverflows basic question ka answer to ker do 1st cell kese kider se aya or prove bhi kerna he.
Ager in basice questions k answer hoty to bhai ye debate hi khatam ho jati wo question wese k wese hi hain koi prove bhi day diya kro jub kisi book main kisi kuch likh deny se answer nai samj lety
@ again. Read a goddamn book instead of arguing in comments here. Not wasting my time on your childish idiocy
@@myslantyar ap ko ja kar evolution ke bare mein proper biologists ke lecture sunane chahiye kiun ke bhai ap ke first almost sare questions ke answer diye ja chuke hein
Is this the way to do science and philosophise? A specimen: What's the "origin" of universe? What existed before "Big Bang"?
There is no before the Big Bang because the Big Bang itself is t=0
The concept of existence is limited by time and space.
Time and space are constructs of mind. @@arifsaleem5467
@@arifsaleem5467These are constructs of mind
Metaphysics obviously takes us beyond physical world. What's beyond that transcends us? Did Marx explore this world? No! Why? His belief in making this PHYSICAL universe better for humans was unparalleled.
What is metaphysics?
👍
We see caterpillars turning into butterflies. A surface moving insect turns into a flying insect.
Aggar science main taraqi krni hai to uskalia mazhab side py rakh k . rational mind sa sochna zruri ha. Mazhab ki ainak lga k ham science ko kabhi nhe samjh sakty
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
No not at all, physical description never negates metaphysicality
Sir you have described physical enitieies and laws rather metaphysical
Decort physical and metaphysical principles are much different sir
You ate not new one just confusing commeners sir 😊
BTW, what is metaphysics?
What happened if pluto and these philosophers are right and science proof this?
❤
Mughey lagta hai kai ye lecture sunney key baad qaisar raja ki aqal thikaney aa gai hoon gee 😂😂😂
Physicists do more of mathematics than philosophy!That too when they're religious (spiritualists). This is paradoxical and problematic that needs proper diagnosis, understanding and solution. Mathematics follows a set childish logic. Philospphy follows dialectic-logic, if at all philosophy is truly interested in pursuing truth.
What truth, the one you yourself concocted, brainwashed into, or chose to believe without evidence?
And what method do you suggest to find and verify that so-called personal unverified and unverifiable truth?
Please enlighten us all.
@@arifsaleem5467Asim Munir is the present truth. Zia was truth in the past...
No Qaiser Raja is harmed in this video 😂
Still raja sab believe in immutable
Sir, totally disagree with you your all lecture because divine guidance can not be get from books it can only gain from heart to heart .
@@adeelarshadwattoo8584 that is also written in books. For example that is one of the main ideas of Rumi.
@Taimur_Laal no. Sir that is just expressed but no one can get it in this language of words. Divine guidance is beyond words and language barrier
@@adeelarshadwattoo8584
Either you got it from a book or from a person who read it in a book, at the end it's still a book written by someone who coined this concept, unless you coined it yourself.
Dear heart is just a pumping organ and nothing else,this biological interpretation of your divine scriptures is wrong,it was actually Aristotelian biological concept which is rejected by today modern biological understanding
Is the universe aware that Homo Sapiens invented Capitalism? 😀
We are not separate from the universe, we are a part of it, so if we know something, a part of the universe also knows.
@@arifsaleem5467A part, not whole?
@@19665061
Yes a part, only a specific part, like a dead buffalo or Andromeda can't know what you know, even if you knew it all and vise versa.
Chasma laga ke aaya na professor wala look 🤓
Lal Salam
Philosophers and others including ourselves should not use the terms "nature", "universe" , "cosmos" etc. loosely and interchangeably. Then Allah-tala and God can't be explained. Nomenclature task leads us to confusion and violence.
Absolutely right. Actually spirituality can not be explained in words or this language there is no language for that , that only need heart listening to understand spiritual or divine knowledge or or divine guidance about actual world or what is purpose of life .
Divine guidance or metaphysical etc can not be get from books that's divine and that demand other form of prerequisites
@@adeelarshadwattoo8584
What other form of prerequisites?
I have listened the whole lecture and can't understand what was the purpose of this effort. So the philosophers in the past made an error on a " minor detail" like you said regarding neo darwinism in response to denise nobel interview recently. " So what , minor errors doesn't refute anything".
are you trying to make a case that the science couldn't have grown so far unless platonic teachings were debunked ? So what , human being were still engaging in science to an extent like ever . It was not the case where human race could have wiped out because of platonic teachings / philosophy.
Materialistic approach or materialization of science has also draw backs hindering the growth of science . Please watch dr. Rupert Sheldrake's work regarding how science is broken.
Furthermore, it seems you imply that human race as some kind of obligation to grow science particularly science of this era . How did you get there ?
Can't we sacrifice the modern science for greater good ?
You can change everything as long as it doesn't hurt THE PURPOSE OF EXISTENCE OF MANKIND i.e submission to the God .
If teleology (final cause, fixed purpose) is given, i e. Nature/Cosmos/Universe just EXISTS 'per se' then... --hello Big Bang Theorists, kindly pay attention to Aristotle!
@@19665061 that’s the point. It is not given.
@@Taimur_LaalRight, if universe has no teleology, then does it have ontology --principle of being/ coming into being like ontology of say labor? Second, aren't physicists on the wrong path in so far as they strive after the "ORIGIN" of the universe? On lighter note, just because they're being paid salaries and perks and allowances so they're at leisure to invent any problem falling and rising in the realm of vague amorphous "origin"?
@ universe does not have an ontology. We have an ontology about the universe.
@@Taimur_LaalWe have many things which are irrational. Like Big Bang, origin of universe, pre-Big Bang v. Post-Big Bang, and so on
Qaisar raja seems to have made you mad so instead of focusing on economics which is your subject you are confused and making your followers focused on such topics. Anyway, after AI what is left to you professors to tell the students.
@@noorahmed2862 AI is an echo chamber. You can get whatever answer you require from it. Professors are needed to advance knowledge.
Cancer the famous bullshitiologist?
In this 37:17 video not a single word is confusing but to understand it needs some I Q level which is beyond the capacity of followers of Qaiser Raja who is living in medieval era
Kiya aap is baat par yakeen karte hai ki allah ne 6 din me zameen asman ko bnaya 😢
@@Lakhvi-b8z I think even maulvis do not take it literally anymore.
Please keep doing what you're doing, Prof. But organically. Please don't get into a dialectic with the not-so-grand inquisitors of Pakistan, who are trying to make common cause to try to bait you into debate.
Sincerely,
Random online admirer.
Yahan ap ny aik bohot achi mistake ki hy.
Religious people evolution ky against nahi hain. Evolution natural process hy. Religious figures natural selection as a matter of randomness and 1 universal ancestor ky against hain.
Aik ideology ky aik part ko reject karny sy zaroori nahi puri ideology hi reject ho jai.
@@muneebrehman95 mistake nahin hai. It is only after 150 years of scientific advance on evolution that they are now ready to concede just a little space to evolution.
@Taimur_Laal so they accept it right.
Do evolution (excluding the randomness aspect), go against Islamic base believes established in Quran and Hadith ( part of Islam which Muslims believe as absolute fact )?
@Taimur_Laal i do agree that they did not accept at first. It was for the political reasons. Just for an example in south asia, some of the islamic schools rejected British and everything that British taught. According to book I read the history of Muslim education system in Hindustan by Molana Sayed Munazir Ahsan Gilani.
@@Taimur_Laalthanks for your answer.
Would love to learn more about things under which I can understand with reasoning (which can be right or wrong)
@@Taimur_Laalas if your scientific revolution has proved any of these two claims (Random mutation and Common Ancestory)!
ruclips.net/video/62BABCgJSO8/видео.htmlsi=Gt8vkkxSe12BEuhY
Sir Thank You Very Much❤
zayada tar muslim aj ke dor me heliocentric ko hi mante he
q ke iska aqeede se koi lena dena nahi he..
Can you define divine force by science?
All are sugar coated lies
❤❤❤🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Lobe to see such a intellectual like TAIMUR LAL in Pakistan.....
I could not imagine that people like you does exist in such a religious extremist country.
Then you need to learn to learn more before making up your mind about something.
Quaisar is incorrigible
آپ بندر سے انسان بن گئے ہیں اب انسان سے بھاگڑبلا کب بنیں گے
Professor of history talking on biological science. Even he doesn't have an understanding of own subject. How will he talk about this biological science. Ya wrong number hai.
@@Faqr-e-Ghayoor this is school level biology and science. It comes under basic knowledge.
@Taimur_Laal School-level knowledge provides only a basic foundation, which is essential but far from exhaustive. Even textbooks acknowledge that certain subjects, like the theory of evolution, are still evolving and not fully conclusive. While history students may consider such material a complete study, in the realm of science, it’s essential to view these concepts as part of an ongoing investigation rather than a finished narrative. Scientists continuously refine and expand upon these theories.
Limitations of Darwinism:
Lack of Genetic Basis: Darwin’s original theory lacked knowledge of heredity and genetics. He proposed "blending inheritance," which contradicted his ideas of variation and natural selection.
Mechanism of Variation: Darwin could not explain how new variations arise or are preserved.
Complexity of Traits: Evolutionary changes in complex traits and behaviors couldn't be entirely explained by gradualism.
Fossil Record Gaps: Critics argue that the fossil record does not always show gradual transitions between species, as Darwin predicted.
Cooperation vs. Competition: Darwin emphasized competition but underestimated the role of cooperation and mutualism in evolution.
Limitations of Neo-Darwinism:
Overemphasis on Mutation: Neo-Darwinism places heavy reliance on mutations as the primary source of variation, neglecting other mechanisms like epigenetics and horizontal gene transfer.
Role of Environment: It underestimates the impact of environmental factors in shaping evolution through phenotypic plasticity.
Gradualism Questioned: Evidence from punctuated equilibrium suggests that evolution may proceed in rapid bursts rather than slow, steady changes.
Emerging Complexity: It struggles to explain the origin of complex molecular systems and pathways (e.g., the evolution of the eye).
Epigenetics: Modern studies show that heritable changes can occur without alterations in DNA sequences, challenging traditional genetic views.
Non-Adaptive Traits: Neo-Darwinism fails to address traits that do not appear to provide a survival advantage but persist nonetheless. So it is better to don't mislead students.
Better to concentrate on your subject.
@@Faqr-e-Ghayoorevolution (and speciation ) has been proven beyond doubt. Molvis need to catch up. Grow up . The world has moved on / nobody takes you ID guys seriously anywhere.
@Taimur_Laal
School-level knowledge provides only a basic foundation, which is essential but far from exhaustive. Even textbooks acknowledge that certain subjects, like the theory of evolution, are still evolving and not fully conclusive. While history students may consider such material a complete study, in the realm of science, it’s essential to view these concepts as part of an ongoing investigation rather than a finished narrative. Scientists continuously refine and expand upon these theories.
Darwin’s original theory lacked knowledge of heredity and genetics. He proposed "blending inheritance," which contradicted his ideas of variation and natural selection.
Darwin could not explain how new variations arise or are preserved.
Evolutionary changes in complex traits and behaviors couldn't be entirely explained by gradualism.
Scientists argue that the fossil record does not always show gradual transitions between species, as Darwin predicted.
Darwin emphasized competition but underestimated the role of cooperation and mutualism in evolution.
Neo-Darwinism places heavy reliance on mutations as the primary source of variation, neglecting other mechanisms like epigenetics and horizontal gene transfer. It underestimates the impact of environmental factors in shaping evolution through phenotypic plasticity.
Evidence from punctuated equilibrium suggests that evolution may proceed in rapid bursts rather than slow, steady changes. It struggles to explain the origin of complex molecular systems and pathways (e.g., the evolution of the eye).
Modern studies show that heritable changes can occur without alterations in DNA sequences, challenging traditional genetic views.
Neo-Darwinism fails to address traits that do not appear to provide a survival advantage but persist nonetheless. Don't delete this comment...
Why does my response comment disappear?
How you being a lecturer on politics and especially on communism can talk on evolution?
@@ma9131 this lecture is actually more about philosophy. Sunno tu sahi.
@@Taimur_Laal zabardasti
Qaiser Ahmed raja ka samna bath aak minute tik ja oska samna 😂
Mirza Ghalib was better scientist than our modern physicists. Surely a better philosopher. See this: "Jab ye jahan na thha to khuda tu thha"! Something...something. What's God? Our idea! Within that idea, something inexplicable! Utmost honesty! Ghalib meant to say, God/Idea/Universe is INEXPLICABLE to HUMAN MIND. That's the wisdom. His wisdom! Why can't physicists understand this little udea that we can't understand and know this observable universe! Scientists instead of getting reigned in, got more obstinate like obstibate boy Zelensky who keeps on craving for toy guns: We wanna see more universes, multi-universes! One Big Bang was beyond our handling, we posited multi-universes!! Why? Because salary is fixed! Perks given! Allowances and DA fixed! Rather DA increasing! 😂. So, take a paper pad, a pencil, sit on sofa ....start hallucinating about any abstract theory! There are over 100 versions of Quantum Nechanics/Theory! There's big scam of scienticism! 😂😂
Qaiser Ahmed raja tera baap 😂
Does GOD is binded by hos own plan??? Does HIS will also bound as per law of physics/gravity/ time n space ??? It's we humans are reluctant to such fixed patterns of universal laws. It's we who are prisoners of
Past, Present ,Future ,Time and space .
by the way least worse system is capitalist model not socialist it may be placed on 2nd least worse model in realism
Aggar science main taraqi krni hai to uskalia mazhab side py rakh k . rational mind sa sochna zruri ha. Mazhab ki ainak lga k ham science ko kabhi nhe samjh sakty