@@BoardOfItReviews yes. Not that you'd care for it but there's a second printing planned for StS. And I really like DC. DC and Forests of Adrimon are my top beloved games. Painting the mini however is quite a challenge.
I have not! I actually first played StS after the board game came out. I quite enjoy it, and having such a good experience with dead cells makes me want to try it!
Disagree - I'm talking about the "Preparation" section of combat, not the playing of cards. There are no examples for what to say in preparation and the only instruction is "don't say symbols". Round and type are only allowed once you've played the card, e.g. it's too late to change anything. Round and type are also the only examples.
@@BoardOfItReviews rb.10, right: Dina "saying, “I will do a Poison attack in Round 2” ." Carrie "“I will do a Skill action in Round 1” ." Gabriel plays his card, and says, “I will Loot in Round 3” . The reason for this rule is that the game breaks with perfect information, that's also why you draw Serenade face down, and in 2-handed you draw cards from 1 Beheaded face down as well.
@@kosterix123 As I said before, this example is not from the preparation phase, where you should quickly discuss. The only examples are from the "play combat cards" phase. At this point you've already played your card. It of course provides a limited amount of information to the next player/players, but that's about it. I personally don't think the game would break if you played open, as it's still not given you can perfectly beat a set of monsters if everyone can see all the information - you still have decisions to make about where to take damage and when to do X. However I would not play open, because it will lead to quarterbacking. I just think what they state for the prep phase is really wishy-washy e.g. don't be specific, oh but do say what you'll do, but don't say icons, but DO say icons at the specific right moment.
Hey. Im new to the channel, and yet, explaining differences and justifying them felt a bit defensive and a waste of time. Maybe leave that for the end of the video?
Heya, thanks for the feedback! Unfortunately there isn't much I can do about that now, and I don't expect to do another video is this format again, but will certainly keep it in mind. I think the viewpoint was that is is very far from our usual style/level of effort and I wanted to make sure people were aware of the mitigating circumstances in the case they consider checking out a different video at another point. Was just really excited to talk about the game, and didn't have any other way to do it!
@@BoardOfItReviews not really, review should have interaction with the game to walk me through your opinion. I don't need full game length for review format, but dry opinion isn't a review either. I know there's always self promotion aspect, but I came here for the game, not you, and I was watching you on chair just talking. This might be harsh to read.. and if you don't get it's not my problem.
@@mienzillaz What is interaction with the game? I don't think you're being clear at all. Or will find many reviews that don't show the reviewer at any point. Also, just to note, I clearly say at the start this is not our usual review format and list the reasons I don't show the game in front of me. If you missed that, it's not my problem ;)
@@BoardOfItReviews if you can't do a review then don't force it, you popped the question at the end and I answered.. and that's a second comment where you pretend you don't get it.. maybe you really don't, which would explain bad clip.. What's your goal for this conversation? You want to convince me that I haven't witnessed shit review, cause you said it will be shit at the start of the clip, and I should close my eyes and imagine how awesome review this would have been in different circumstances? If you find my comment unfair and you think you did a great job then stick to this, why bother.. if you care about feedback then start listening..
@@mienzillaz Amazing you've written all that and not explained what "interaction" is. What is your goal for this conversation, to be rude and unclear while pretending to give feedback? It's always quite humorous how everyone who acts rude in the guise of giving "feedback" or "advice" because they don't like something always act like their one bit of advice is going to be revolutionary for the channel and us not "listening" is going to keep us stuck in channel hell with no views. Frankly, feedback is great, but you saying "I don't like static pictures" and "you didn't show the game" "I don't want a playthrough" is a complete juxtaposition, then you refused to elaborate. I'm still not even sure what your "feedback" is, honestly because you've been contradictory.
Chuckle I was like, where's the table!?!? I'll have to give this game another look-at...
Thankfully the table maintenance is now complete!
First slay the spire now this ?? Board game video game enthusiast are living the life!
Oh and Children of Morta, and Terraria. And many more are out already.
What a time to be alive.
@@BoardOfItReviews yes.
Not that you'd care for it but there's a second printing planned for StS.
And I really like DC. DC and Forests of Adrimon are my top beloved games.
Painting the mini however is quite a challenge.
This looks cool! Thanks for showcasing it. Have you played Slay The Spire (the board game) yet? Would be very interested in hearing how that compares.
I have not! I actually first played StS after the board game came out. I quite enjoy it, and having such a good experience with dead cells makes me want to try it!
Compares in what sense?
Both are big boxes. Both have unlocking.
Just buy both.
Thanks for the video 😎
Thanks for watching!
Hm the communication is not as loose as you say. Every player gets to say round and type. Read the examples in the rulebook if you’re having trouble.
Disagree - I'm talking about the "Preparation" section of combat, not the playing of cards. There are no examples for what to say in preparation and the only instruction is "don't say symbols". Round and type are only allowed once you've played the card, e.g. it's too late to change anything. Round and type are also the only examples.
@@BoardOfItReviews rb.10, right:
Dina "saying, “I will do a Poison attack in Round 2” ."
Carrie "“I will do a Skill action in Round 1” ."
Gabriel plays his card, and says, “I will Loot in Round 3” .
The reason for this rule is that the game breaks with perfect information, that's also why you draw Serenade face down, and in 2-handed you draw cards from 1 Beheaded face down as well.
@@kosterix123 As I said before, this example is not from the preparation phase, where you should quickly discuss. The only examples are from the "play combat cards" phase. At this point you've already played your card. It of course provides a limited amount of information to the next player/players, but that's about it.
I personally don't think the game would break if you played open, as it's still not given you can perfectly beat a set of monsters if everyone can see all the information - you still have decisions to make about where to take damage and when to do X. However I would not play open, because it will lead to quarterbacking. I just think what they state for the prep phase is really wishy-washy e.g. don't be specific, oh but do say what you'll do, but don't say icons, but DO say icons at the specific right moment.
Hey. Im new to the channel, and yet, explaining differences and justifying them felt a bit defensive and a waste of time. Maybe leave that for the end of the video?
Heya, thanks for the feedback! Unfortunately there isn't much I can do about that now, and I don't expect to do another video is this format again, but will certainly keep it in mind. I think the viewpoint was that is is very far from our usual style/level of effort and I wanted to make sure people were aware of the mitigating circumstances in the case they consider checking out a different video at another point.
Was just really excited to talk about the game, and didn't have any other way to do it!
I like this more chill off the cuff style !
Thank you!
Looks fantastic.
We certainly think it is!
Uff.. constant switching to static pictures and really not showing anything about the game.. not helpful at all..
So you want a...playthrough?
@@BoardOfItReviews not really, review should have interaction with the game to walk me through your opinion. I don't need full game length for review format, but dry opinion isn't a review either.
I know there's always self promotion aspect, but I came here for the game, not you, and I was watching you on chair just talking. This might be harsh to read.. and if you don't get it's not my problem.
@@mienzillaz What is interaction with the game? I don't think you're being clear at all. Or will find many reviews that don't show the reviewer at any point. Also, just to note, I clearly say at the start this is not our usual review format and list the reasons I don't show the game in front of me. If you missed that, it's not my problem ;)
@@BoardOfItReviews if you can't do a review then don't force it, you popped the question at the end and I answered.. and that's a second comment where you pretend you don't get it.. maybe you really don't, which would explain bad clip..
What's your goal for this conversation? You want to convince me that I haven't witnessed shit review, cause you said it will be shit at the start of the clip, and I should close my eyes and imagine how awesome review this would have been in different circumstances?
If you find my comment unfair and you think you did a great job then stick to this, why bother.. if you care about feedback then start listening..
@@mienzillaz Amazing you've written all that and not explained what "interaction" is. What is your goal for this conversation, to be rude and unclear while pretending to give feedback? It's always quite humorous how everyone who acts rude in the guise of giving "feedback" or "advice" because they don't like something always act like their one bit of advice is going to be revolutionary for the channel and us not "listening" is going to keep us stuck in channel hell with no views.
Frankly, feedback is great, but you saying "I don't like static pictures" and "you didn't show the game" "I don't want a playthrough" is a complete juxtaposition, then you refused to elaborate. I'm still not even sure what your "feedback" is, honestly because you've been contradictory.