Thank you so much for these videos! My supervisor hasn't been helpful with research so I have to fend for myself. So thank you for the words of advice!!
One thing that isn't talked about in non-linguistic circles is that "exactly as spoken" doesn't mean to include every speech sound. Words like "have" regularly get reduced to just a [v] sound and we think we hear that whole word (within the context of a conversation). Since everything rests on the actual sounds that are uttered doing such orthographic transcription boosts contrast and reinforces the meaning, but doubling down on a particular word from [v] might be wrong. I am tired of hearing people say these are the "exact" or "every" sound, when the words are a controlled hallucination that fills in details and is difficult to be pulled away from, discover and believe ruclips.net/video/EaXYas58_kc/видео.htmlsi=_q5jBiWSaybhNj_z
thank you for your information , please make a video on focus group discussion if you have time . if you don't mind let me ask you some questions about FGD . 1. what is the unit of analysis in FGD ? 2. how can we analyze the data that emerge from FGD ( there are different ideas in FGD , and there are a lot of codes and themes in FGD, so which theme is going to report ? 3. is maximum variation with in the group or across the group ?
Is it correct that detailed notes are enough to include in the dissertation and code for findings? Someone told me this is better than transcribing everything.
Hello! I have been watching your videos and they have been very helpful to me. I am conducting qualitative research, but I have found that many people are hesitant to record audio. So, my question is whether it is necessary to record audio, or if we can collect data through email or face-to-face interviews instead?
yes this is acceptable. I would say that through email is the least desired way, as you will never gather the data of the same quality (no opportunity to ask for clarification, ask follow up questions, etc.), but you can do that too. In face to face, although it is best to record the audio, you can take (a lot of notes) instead so yes, in theory both of these are acceptable ways of gathering interview data
Thank you for pointing this out. There is no rule that directly states which one to use, but I find square brackets to be what I use more often. You are right that this seems to be contradicted by the example - I adopted this example from a different source and didn't realize that the example may contradict what I'm saying :)
Thank you so much for your videos. These are really a great help. Also, it will be of a great help if you could please suggest a good book on qualitative study
How to design ipa interview questions please? Is it one-go, eg. 45 minutes or shall i continue another one or two interview after i find some questions are not answered please? Thanks
ideally most of it at least, unless someone talks about something that is 100% off topic and irrelevant (but bear in mind that sometimes something that seems irrelevant turns out to be relevant later)
because it is about transcribing the interviews, which is for references and citations, not transcription. They may have some preferences perhaps, not sure about this, but how you transcribe will definitely NOT depend on your referencing convention
Visit my website and explore the different ways in which I can support you and your study! drkriukow.com/my-services/
Thank you so much for these videos! My supervisor hasn't been helpful with research so I have to fend for myself. So thank you for the words of advice!!
I am happy that I could be of help!
i do understand your feeling
Same thing here 🙌🏼
Same thing here 🙌🏼
One thing that isn't talked about in non-linguistic circles is that "exactly as spoken" doesn't mean to include every speech sound. Words like "have" regularly get reduced to just a [v] sound and we think we hear that whole word (within the context of a conversation). Since everything rests on the actual sounds that are uttered doing such orthographic transcription boosts contrast and reinforces the meaning, but doubling down on a particular word from [v] might be wrong. I am tired of hearing people say these are the "exact" or "every" sound, when the words are a controlled hallucination that fills in details and is difficult to be pulled away from, discover and believe ruclips.net/video/EaXYas58_kc/видео.htmlsi=_q5jBiWSaybhNj_z
Hi, can you do tabulation on surveys questions such as why? and transcript for quantitative research. Thank you ❤
Using qualitative research method is not common in my department for thesis. Thank you sir, for the insights
Glad it was helpful!
thank you for your information , please make a video on focus group discussion if you have time . if you don't mind let me ask you some questions about FGD .
1. what is the unit of analysis in FGD ?
2. how can we analyze the data that emerge from FGD ( there are different ideas in FGD , and there are a lot of codes and themes in FGD, so which theme is going to report ?
3. is maximum variation with in the group or across the group ?
I do in fact have a video on FG analysis :)
Thanks for your tremendous efforts Dr. :)
Is it correct that detailed notes are enough to include in the dissertation and code for findings? Someone told me this is better than transcribing everything.
Hello! I have been watching your videos and they have been very helpful to me. I am conducting qualitative research, but I have found that many people are hesitant to record audio. So, my question is whether it is necessary to record audio, or if we can collect data through email or face-to-face interviews instead?
yes this is acceptable. I would say that through email is the least desired way, as you will never gather the data of the same quality (no opportunity to ask for clarification, ask follow up questions, etc.), but you can do that too. In face to face, although it is best to record the audio, you can take (a lot of notes) instead so yes, in theory both of these are acceptable ways of gathering interview data
Thank you so much 👍
I like to know how to write the approach to the introduction of the transcription its a neutralist
You say square brackets... [...], but instead use parentheses (..) in your example. Was this intentional or a mistake?
Thank you for pointing this out. There is no rule that directly states which one to use, but I find square brackets to be what I use more often. You are right that this seems to be contradicted by the example - I adopted this example from a different source and didn't realize that the example may contradict what I'm saying :)
Thank you so much for your videos. These are really a great help. Also, it will be of a great help if you could please suggest a good book on qualitative study
I have a recent video in which I review and recommend several books on qualitative research ruclips.net/video/8oGCY2KTvls/видео.html
How to design ipa interview questions please? Is it one-go, eg. 45 minutes or shall i continue another one or two interview after i find some questions are not answered please? Thanks
I have a video in which I talk about developing an interview guide. And you will need more than 1 interview for this
Is it necessary to transcribe the whole interview…?
ideally most of it at least, unless someone talks about something that is 100% off topic and irrelevant (but bear in mind that sometimes something that seems irrelevant turns out to be relevant later)
Can I download free text from audio?
Thank you for the tips
Any time! :) I also have several other videos about interviewing (check the newest ones I posted, this week and last week), hope you'll enjoy them!
Thank youuuuuuuuuuuuuu !!!!!!!
you are very welcome!
Thank you
You're welcome!
This doesn’t cover APA 7…
because it is about transcribing the interviews, which is for references and citations, not transcription. They may have some preferences perhaps, not sure about this, but how you transcribe will definitely NOT depend on your referencing convention