I swear your videos always make me want to get all my old parts together, get some more parts from that time and build a retro gaming pc myself. Still dreaming of a DOS system in my home
This is the first card I ever had and replacing it with a Radeon 9800 so I could run KOTOR was what got me interested in hardware and PC building. I still have both the 128 Pro and 9800 in their boxes somewhere. Familiarity with ATI/AMD and my extreme laziness, which meant to not wanting to get used to Nvidia software, are why I've been team red for 20 years. Now I stick with AMD for their (IMO) better business practices and more open source approach, but like most fanboys on either side, I'd be lying if I said I had chosen my preferred brand based on logic and testing. Now I have the information to justify why I stick with AMD, but in reality I just kept with the brand that my 15 year old self found in my mom's late 90's/Y2K era desktop.
A Radeon 9800 Pro, was my first ATI GPU, before that I was Nvidia only, let me tell you, it was a eye opening moment for me, not because the GPU was bad but how good it was compared to what I really imagined.
I was more of a nVidia Riva TNT2 guy at the time. I really liked that card, never had issues. Played Quake 3 Arena, Unreal Tournament and Counter Strike a lot on it, and it was very fast. But ATI Rage 128 Pro probably would do the trick too.
All much of a muchness, between the V3, Rage 128 Ultra and TNT2. Interesting to see how different those cards are to each other, and the varied images they produce on the same games. Cool times, back then, in PC gaming.
I have several of these in PCI and AGP format. They are the perfect cards for upgrading old systems to play DVDs without ANY lag. Gaming is average/mediocre at best but still good enough. I use them mainly in Pentium III's and the like.
That's not just a Rage 128 Pro, that's a Rage Fury Pro. It's the top end SKU of the Rage 128 Pro lineup. A fantastic card which can be had for very cheap.
@@kyles8524 The Rage 128 Ultra is slower than the Rage 128 Pro, mainly because of the memory bandwidth advantage on the Rage 128 Pro. There's also a Rage 128 Pro Ultra which is the slowest of the three, once again due to memory bandwidth. The Rage Fury MAXX is the one I just used to build a Tualatin build. It's quite fast.
@@thepcenthusiastchannel2300 interesting, I do have some 128 pro cards. thanks for the info. you seem good with computer stuff. Why wont my old agp mobos read off a sata drive? Ive even used jumpers to show its the main drive....on 3 motherboars and Ive tried 3 different drives despite the fact there are several sata ports on all 3, Problem is I dont have any IDE drives.its all SATA even in bios theres no mention of a sata drive its all IDE. I was just going to put together a retro win xp computer but its a pain.I already have retro computers but wanted one a custom build
@@kyles8524 I used a Startech SATA to IDE which has its own set of jumpers on the PCB and it worked with the TUSL2-C motherboard. You also have to be careful not going over the 28-bit LBA. Anything larger than around 127GB doesn't work. Best to use hard drives that are 64GB or less in size.
@@thepcenthusiastchannel2300 yeah the smallest drive is 320gb the rest are 1 to 4 tbs. I technically do have drives but they are in finished 3dfx builds. ebat has them but for like 40 bucks.........
I know these videos have been out a while but I just got into retro building last year. I love this channel, LGR, and Nostalgia Nerd. Started out because I found some old software still tucked away from childhood(sadly my old hardware including my prized CT1600 Sound Blaster are long gone) so I went on the hunt for a 486 machine to build(now have 7 of them), and been building several different machines from 486 to socket 7 to super socket 7 and everything from Pentium up to Pentium 4.
I had an ATI Rage Pro 128 and upgraded to an STB Velocity 4400... straight up the Rage 128 had more consistent frame times and was a nicer playing experience.
The ATi Rage 128 is just a re-branded Tseng Labs ET6300. It's the last and fastest Tseng! Tseng was purchased by ATi in 1997. Their 3D graphics card, the ET6300, was released as the Rage 128 after the purchase.
The All in Wonder was such a great card. It was so easy to transfer camcorder video to the computer, to save for posterity & edit. If you had a super VHS camcorder, you could import high quality videos, edit them, then transfer them back to a super VHS VCR. You could also take VCR tapes & convert them into a shareable format, though RUclips was pretty new at the time. As far as gaming performance, it was never it's strong point & let's just say I had a computer I used for multimedia stuff & another for more serious stuff & games. It was a bit disappointing, since I probably spent the most time on the multimedia PC. It was handy being able to watch TV on my desktop while I worked. My first All In Wonder was a Rage II based card, and it was never really known for its 3d acceleration prowess. It was pretty slow, compared to the newer chipsets out there. All that changed with the All in Wonder Rage 128. For the first time, I could do everything on one machine, if I so chose. It also left my other machine open for LAN parties & competitive Descent. (1, 2 & 3)
The first time I saw Quake II on a Rage 128 Pro card I was completely blown away. I love this retro geek stuff. Great job on the review and thanks for doing it.
I've found the Rage 128/pro/ultra cards to be excellent DOS cards as well. This is a boat that AMD is really missing, HDMI capture capabilities. ATI was the leader in that category of video capture and output built in to their cards back in the 90's through the early 2000's. That was something that just came with their cards usually, except in OEM versions. Seems like AMD would sell a hell of a lot of cards with HDMI capture today. Back in 2002, there abouts, I used an NEC desktop computer with a Celeron 333 chip in it as a HTPC, long before HTPC was a term that was used. I used the s-video output of a MX440 card to run to the TV. It worked, but I was really glad when I moved to LCD in 2007 and went with HDMI.
Lassi Kinnunen 128 Ultra scores higher in DOS benchmarks, fps, topbench etc.. than an S3, Voodoo, TNT2, Geforce. I've run the benchmarks, I know. Before I do a CPU comparison video I test video cards to see which one yields the highest scores for that platform and OS tested with.
These videos are awesome. I wasn't quite able to do much with computers, let alone read what they said back when these cards were released, but I'm fond of old tech and this is a cool look back into what PCs were capable of before.
I used the ATi Rage 128 GL 16MB for many years. It came with my first 3D capable graphics card in my first PC Pentium _!!!_ 450 of my own. I later upgraded it to a ATi Radeon 256 DDR 64 MB ViVo After this, I switched to the Green team with a GeForce 4 Ti 4600, 7800 GT, 8800GTX, GTX 570, GTX 780 Ti and currently a GTX 1080
Just a thing to keep in mind when running games in 32-bit on ATI games of the time, they actually run the z-buffer in 16-bit (not 100% sure it's the z-buffer, but they do get their boost because they still run some operations in 16-bit). Anyway, if my memory is correct, they were not competitive in 3D until they released Radeon cards.
Yes you're right, thanks for setting the record straight! I wasn't aware of this setting, it is called something along the lines "convert 32 bit textures to 16" and boosts performance, but doesn't look as nice. Unfortunately I used those settings. However, all the "new" videos and results I have changed this. So the videos with the GeForce 256 and anything in the future will have the correct 32 bit quality :)
They were a solid card. Certain office brand PC's had a habit of including Rage128 cards with their systems, so we came into many back in the day. I remember testing a Rage 128 Ultra one time just out of curiosity as to how it stacked up and it played GP 500 amazingly well in 1024x768 32 bit colour. I mean it wasn't perfect, but it was playable and looked really nice.
Very cool, I have so many of these rage 128 pro cards around from the severely cut down cards to the fully loaded tv tuner all in wonder cards with the component inputs. There cool cards
I have an All-in-Wonder 128 pro. I actually like the image quality on this card more than on Voodoo2/3 cards :). It even supports tri-linear filtering, and the performance hit from using 32bpp isn't that bad.
Man, this video threw me back in time. I used to have this exact card back in the day, upgraded from a 16MB Vanta, and the thing felt like lightening in comparison, the VIVO functionality was great, as we could all sit and watch movies on our CRT TV which was vastly superior to the monitor i had (15'' Compaq) :D
I bought an ATI Rage 128 Pro 32mb PCI off ebay for $7 shipped because of this video, along with another $7.50 512mb SDRAM for a Pentium III workstation my uncle left me. It will be my first "retro build."
i had this gpu, ati rage rage 128 fury 32mb, non pro, it was great, yes 16bit always sucked, but 32bit wow. it ran even max payne 1, nfs porshe, with a good cpu it was a monster
I had the 16 bit, it somehow ran gta san andreas (64 bit min.) sometimes little buggy, vice city with ease which requires 32 bit card minimum, dunno what was going on then. .......... darrn i wasted precious hours of my life on that, then again, at least not wasting that of other's on here. So enough of this bye. Ps Switched to more mature (i like to think so) titles, like golf, or brain deteriation repression training (something like that, don't quite remember). Anywho, bye.
@@Geert365 you must be crazy. i tried to run san andreas on a rage 128 pro agp and it was basically unplayable at lowest settings. i had to switch it with the 7000 or 7500 64mb in my other computer, i'm not smart enough to remember what that shitty GPU was. 64mb was the minimum for that game. edit: jumping out of the plane was the spot that was unpassable with the ati rage 128 pro because of the extreme lag. jumping out to the plane graveyard... san andreas is a very poorly optimized game though. it could have done alot better on older hardware but rockstar was a greedy corporation and put profit over optimization.
May be one of these days i will give it a go, was getting the old boy up and running again, see if i remembered it wrong then may be, but pretty sure , would a dual core with 8800 gt run it choppy at times, only other pc i used here. Real world priorities though, so no time soon (not that i think you , or anyone are anxiously awaiting any outcome of that). Quit gta, it's really about making money, like you said, and can really disrupt peoples lives i think, unless you are pretty well grounded on your feet. That discussion goes back to the eighties and movies (probably before that), gonna not touch that subject matter any further.
my first pc had a Ati all-in-wonder (rage 128), it was absolutely fantastic for the day. even having a small window overlay with live TV whilst playing a game or recording a program. it wasn't without its faults or quirks but on the whole did a good job and played many games for the time more than adequately with few driver issues.
I just got an old PC for free and this card was inside. There was also Asus P4XP-X motherboard inside and an old 1.8ghz Pentium 4, along with 256MB of RAM. And to my surprise, everything still works without a problem, but case was really dirty and old, so I threw it away. And yes, when I fired it up it went straight to Windows 2000. I might even build a retro gaming system with these parts in the future, since I saw that this motherboard is one of the best socket 478 motherboards around.
Phil you are a legend mate. I had no issues with the dvd player set to region 2 and away it went with nice play back. I'm using the xpert 2000 agp which is a variant based on the rage 128 chip.
Your video's have inspired me to purchase some older parts to play my old DOS/Win98 games again. Have picked up a P4 2.8GHz, 256MB RAM, GeForce FX5500. Just trying to hunt down a cheap Vortex 2 card :)
Yes it's quite a good card, had great price per performance and a decent image quality for the time. Plus it also had a very clean open source driver support for Linux/mesa-3d and Amigaos/warp3d... good times
The ATI Theater chip was AMAZING. It was highly praised as a capture device in its day. The Theater 200 improved on this an was a very affordable option for recording svideo. You had to buy Matrox level equipment to get better capture. In fact I have a whole setup based on a P4 and a 850 XTPE that I use to record old VHS footage.
My high school had these in their Dell PCs which were used for C++ and CAD/ Drafting classes and these cards were quite good when we did CAD work. Sadly they were locked down so much that we couldn't do much else with the PC which meant games and videos were out of the question. On occasion we would have internet access but still heavily restricted...
I still have my ATI Rage 128 Ultra AGP. It's great for late 90s gaming. Mine came with my very first PC in late 2001. Unfortunately I didn't get much mileage out of it in terms of early-mid 00s gaming, for obvious reasons.
My first ever gaming pc: K6-2/350 and a 32mb Rage 128 Pro. Upgraded to it just in time for Everquest to come out and it played that game for thousands of hours. Plus the OpenGL? Glide? (I fogot) support in Quake was pretty darn good as far as I can remember.
Glide was 3dfx, OpenGL were the rest, ati ogl drivers sucked hard for years, but stull they worked fine for the quake3 era, but in 2000- 2008 they were lame
I have an ATI Rage Pro Turbo AGP that I never tried, but you inspired me to try it in one of my Asus P3V4X computers. I wound up using an installation disc from a Rage Pro 128 PCI card. It worked perfectly and it installed a DVD player too. It has nice image quality and I think the performance in between a Voodoo3 and a Banshee. I think I will add a Voodoo2 or two... ;)
Thx for this video. One point- please use benchmarks with not more than 5 cards. Otherwise the letters are so small that noone is able tp read the names. Thx. But the video and commentation ist great. Today i build up a celeron 333a system with such a card (gigabyte gv-ag32as) on a asus p2b bx440 board. I use it for gaming with games from the time the celeron was an actual cpu. From my experience the card is a worthy opponent to a riva TNT, especially in 32bit. You will get them very cheap at ebay(which isn't true for TNT cards). Important is to look at the memory interface. Try to get a GL type. They got 128bit memory bandwidth and not 64bit like the LE models
nice and interesting video, like all you upload to this channel :D (sorry by my bad english LOL), you make me want to continue my project of building a P1 88Mhz pc with DOS
Ive actually got one of these Rage 128 cards with 32mb of VRAM , The performance isn't too bad and the image quality is good (not quite to Matrox standards, but good). The main flaw of course is that , like the Nvidia , its somewhat generic, since there is no support for Glide or something unique like EMBM or S3 Compressed textures. in my mind the ideal setup for this card would be to have it run alongside a Voodoo2 SLI setup . You can have the V2 for Glide and sheer speed in 16bit colour games, and the Rage 128 can act as the main card for games that benefit from 32bit colour or the higher amounts of VRAM (the image quality and overall DOS performance makes it suitable too)
Great video as always Phil, but the Moiré pattern is very prominent in nearly the entire video, although from 20:04 onward the Moiré pattern seems completely gone. I thought that was only an issue when you film an old CRT monitor with a cheap digital camera, but here you're using an LCD all the time. I found that little strange because LCD's usually have a default refresh rate of 60 Hz and use a completely different digital technology.
I used to love ATI cards back in the day - although I never used one of this specific generation (I was running S3 cards on my K6/K6-2 builds), I upgraded a Geforce 2Ti with a Radeon 8500 on my AthlonXP and was immediately amazed by how much sharper and clearer the picture was (this was a time when nVidia still had crappy picture quality, which went away with the GeForce4 series). That said, the Rage128Pro is an utter mess - it's not really the performances (which are a bit of a letdown) but the fact there existed a bazillion cheap&crap version of this card, mostly peddled on office-grade builds, which makes it nigh-on-impossible to actually find a good one with the promised 128-bit bus. I have probably 5 or 6 of these, all marked differently (Rage 128, Rage 128Pro, Rage128Ultra etc), with visibly different PCBs (some are the famous "L" shaped, some square and red or green) and they ALL are 64-bit, all with the exact same (bad) performances. One of them is a Gigabyte GV-AG32S, which on the Gigabyte website shows as specification of 128-bit...and it's 64-bit, same exact performances as the basic "L" shape cards extracted from some 2000 MS-Word machine. So yeah, if you're building a retro-machine of this era, I wouldn't bother with this card, unfortunately :/
Great video Phil. Just a tip: that overall comparison you did where you summed all the framerates together to get an overall score is not an ideal statistic, since it's easily skewed by extreme results. A much better statistic would be to use the median framerate for a a particular colour depth.
Hmm, but each game performs differently, so how would the median work? It's just a rough figure, and apart from the few odd results (looking at Earth on the TNT2), it works quite well.
+PhilsComputerLab we had our little debate about this on Facebook, but to me, the median of a collection of average framerates (for different games) would indicate to me what a base level performance for the card would be in any random game. If we have a median average framerate of say 40 fps, then in my mind, I would expect that 50% of the time I'll have an average framerate of 40 fps or less and 50% of the time I'll have an average framerate of 40 or more. You could also calculate the 5th percentile to get an idea of what the absolute worst performance one could expect be.
I really like the older ATI cards, my Pentium 3 setup has an All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 128mb, and it has some pretty good multimedia functions like a tv tuner, ect.
19:00 it depended on the receiving tv, what signal you could output. i remember it on my rage 128, because i used to subtitle anime to german and output it to my tv and vcr. and because only few anime i had were pal i had to switch it often to ntsc, which worked.
Wonder if you will do a review of ATI Rage 3D Pro. Way back in 1998 I've had a PC with that graphics card and it couldn't do OpenGL at all, had to rely on Pentium 2 i believe to do the work along with that in games to get some decent performance...Do note that there has been some driver revision just for that GPU.
I have the All in Wonder version well because I desired the TV tuner and recording functionality for recording TV shows and making video CD's (or DVD's) of them.
help. I'm looking for an ISA or PCI display card that supports composite mono monitor. I tried VGA to composite converter, text are blurry and dark. but if I run something in QBasic with Screen 8, the text is sharp and clear
My retro ATI card of choice would be the Radeon 9000/9200. But that might be because I used one of those as my main gaming card for a while back then. :) Anyways, should be faster than the Rage, have better D3D/OGL compatibility, and yet still fully passive cooling.
As 9200 is the card I stuck with for the most years of owning a computer, I can simpathise, but after switching to 9700 on one of my AMD rigs and testing it out, I liked it more for the sheer power it produces in 1997.-2006. oriented gaming - its fast, rock-solid, colder than most 9200's and easily obtainable.
Didn't you encounter any rendering artifacts with this ATI Rage 128? It was infamous for that problem. I'll usually avoid this card along with ATI's earlier Rage Pro and Rage Pro Turbo (both also infamous for rendering artifacts and issues).
Idk, I ran the pro as well as the 128 in some of my junk builds and never had very much issue outside of the drivers at the time. They do need airflow though - that passive cooler isn't anywhere near adequate in a poorly ventilated case.
I always wondered what the differences between the different cards with Rage128 chipsets were. I recently bought an "ATI Xpert2000 Pro Ultra 32M" For some reason none of the drivers from the AMD site worked. I needed to force it to install a driver called "ATI Rage Fury Pro / Xpert2000 Pro" out of said AMD driver using infs. Works fine though.
My iMac G3 has a 128 Pro, and for the machine it is a GREAT card. You have to understand this is a 400 something mhz PPC (Slower than a similarly clocked Pentium, by a lot), but it rocks games like quake just fine. It's a great machine for older games and 68k emulation on OS9 is pretty decent.
Oh, and to add, DVD playback is also flaky HARDWARE on the Mac. It has a DVD drive, but a new disc like the Titanic it stumbles and just jumps ahead more than a reasonable skip would often.
PhilsComputerLab Honestly they are very similar to PCs of the day, especially some of the earlier power macs. They use Power PC, which is a RISC based CPU (Meaning while the IPS per clock is better than a CISC machine, the amount of work an instruction can do is severely reduced. So going from MIPS to MIPS count on a PPC to a Pentium, a Pentium will easily smoke it, and CISC based CPUs have really caught up to RISC to the point where there is no competition) over x86 CISC, but they still had PCI, (Idk if they had AGP) and some of the later G5s even had PCI-E support. I suggest you toy around with mac gaming, and check our Druaga1's content, he has a lot of mac stuff, and even LGR has some content. I suggest for retro Power Macintosh gaming you either go with a G3 box, or an iMac G3 Summer 2000 DV+ model (I have it). The G3 box has more expansion options, but the iMac may be easier to find, and it is a great all round machine. For 68k Gaming, check out what the latest one is, I think it was a performa of some sort. They aren't fast and are on the levels of 386s on clock for clock. For older Power Macintosh gaming, get one of the dual CPU (I think dual core even on top of that) G5 towers. Very loud, but they are as good as a power mac will get. Emulation IS an option, but not a very good one in my opinion. If you need any more info I definitely have one, or check our Druaga1, or LGR's content. I am currently on your Matrox G400 and I have yet to find a video I disliked. If you ever need help I do have some resources, I am currently cobbling together a DX4-100 @120 machine, that is pretty period accurate down, even though it's a tad OP.
I still have one in my closet (I'm 16 years old and I have used a system with this gpu in it shortly before the pentium III in it died and believe me, beautiful experience in older games).
Recently tested the card and would advice against using the latest drivers as I had visual glitches in Quake II and Half-Life (texture flicker). Tried 6XXX drivers and the glitches were gone. Even got better performance by few frames.
I was actually going to buy one recently (along with a Voodo2) and do a build. But since I salvaged a working (and good as new with SLI cable) Diamond Monster 3D II+Diamond Viper V550 from a computer that was going to get scrapped I ended up not going with it.
Have you checked gpu/memory clocks on your card? ATI claimed 140/160 for Pro version. I've seen only 112/125 and 125/143 variants. Fully fledged version come up only in some early reviews on the internet.
I fucking hated owning an old computer with this graphics card in the 2000s. I mean, yeah, it could play UT99, but nothing more advanced. I would run whatever XPlane was current back then at like 5 FPS.
If anyone is looking for a good retro card, this one is good. I had it since 99-2006 and played a lot. Not a single issue, all games had every 3d feature correctly (unlike shit s3 Matrox etc), 32bit was awesome, svideo to composite allowed 1024*768 output, dvd playback on the gpu, 32mb was over the average. The only bad thing was the 16bit performance at first, the tnt2 is faster overall and the voodoo3 could be another great option but only 16bit and 16mb lol. Games i played: max payne, ff7-8, epsxe emulator, quake 2, every tomb raider 1-5, drakan, soldier of fortune, forsaken, nfs 2,3,4,5. Even gta vice city (ultra slow, but i had a shit celeron 333-400 lol, darkstone, quake 3, ut99, mdk 1 2. Ati always has crap drivers at first then they mature a lot, the drivers were 12mb. It was awesome in winme xp. Love this gpu, i wish stupid me never had sold it for pennies
i have one of these cards laying around. it is the pci version. im going to put it in a board with an amd k2 475mhz. not sure if i will have any issues but that the fun part.
i wonder if the ATI Rage 128 ultra can be use as a substitute, the only difference is that the Ultra has a Core clock of 130MHz and a Memory clock of 130MHz and a Bandwidth of 2.088, but the drives are not on AMD website well least for me for me any way. i had to get the drivers from dell.
When playing a dvd you had trouble getting it to work I noticed the old look to the buttons on right of the screen those are the original drivers and software later ATI released updates ver. 5 and so on it had a polished look to the interface brushed steel and back then ATI often had trouble with drivers and software issues that were later fixed in updates I did video capture on a Radion 8500 and later 9000 card converting all my home movies from VHS to CD-R in VCD format I recall test recording many different formats to encode for the best HQ playback it was tedious process but necessary for a noob to it when I was done some months later I had 15yrs worth of home memories on cd that would play in my dvd player not all players had all supported formats that by the way is the sign of a good dvd player is how many different formats it will support it avoids problems watching your favorite new release like your video .
There are indeed all sorts of version. I looked around quite a bit, in the end I payed a premium to get this card. It seems to be an early version with all the features included.
I swear your videos always make me want to get all my old parts together, get some more parts from that time and build a retro gaming pc myself. Still dreaming of a DOS system in my home
Mission accomplished :D But that's the idea, get people excited and share the passion :)
me too, I really want a SLi of Voodoo2, but the price are so freaking high, damn economy!!
There is some Russian seller on the bay that has a stockpile of Voodoo2 cards for $30 and $12 shipping.
got the same problem after watching his video's got me a pentium 4 now for retro gaming my girlfriend says thx a lot :(
This is the first card I ever had and replacing it with a Radeon 9800 so I could run KOTOR was what got me interested in hardware and PC building. I still have both the 128 Pro and 9800 in their boxes somewhere. Familiarity with ATI/AMD and my extreme laziness, which meant to not wanting to get used to Nvidia software, are why I've been team red for 20 years. Now I stick with AMD for their (IMO) better business practices and more open source approach, but like most fanboys on either side, I'd be lying if I said I had chosen my preferred brand based on logic and testing. Now I have the information to justify why I stick with AMD, but in reality I just kept with the brand that my 15 year old self found in my mom's late 90's/Y2K era desktop.
A Radeon 9800 Pro, was my first ATI GPU, before that I was Nvidia only, let me tell you, it was a eye opening moment for me, not because the GPU was bad but how good it was compared to what I really imagined.
I was more of a nVidia Riva TNT2 guy at the time. I really liked that card, never had issues. Played Quake 3 Arena, Unreal Tournament and Counter Strike a lot on it, and it was very fast. But ATI Rage 128 Pro probably would do the trick too.
All much of a muchness, between the V3, Rage 128 Ultra and TNT2. Interesting to see how different those cards are to each other, and the varied images they produce on the same games. Cool times, back then, in PC gaming.
I have several of these in PCI and AGP format. They are the perfect cards for upgrading old systems to play DVDs without ANY lag. Gaming is average/mediocre at best but still good enough. I use them mainly in Pentium III's and the like.
@@wowitsshit9734 They are long gone, sorry. I don't keep a bunch of computers anymore but thanks for asking.
That's not just a Rage 128 Pro, that's a Rage Fury Pro. It's the top end SKU of the Rage 128 Pro lineup. A fantastic card which can be had for very cheap.
theres a 128 ultra I have a few, I think that was the last card unless you want to include the fury maxx I also have a few of them too
@@kyles8524 The Rage 128 Ultra is slower than the Rage 128 Pro, mainly because of the memory bandwidth advantage on the Rage 128 Pro. There's also a Rage 128 Pro Ultra which is the slowest of the three, once again due to memory bandwidth.
The Rage Fury MAXX is the one I just used to build a Tualatin build. It's quite fast.
@@thepcenthusiastchannel2300 interesting, I do have some 128 pro cards. thanks for the info. you seem good with computer stuff. Why wont my old agp mobos read off a sata drive? Ive even used jumpers to show its the main drive....on 3 motherboars and Ive tried 3 different drives despite the fact there are several sata ports on all 3, Problem is I dont have any IDE drives.its all SATA even in bios theres no mention of a sata drive its all IDE. I was just going to put together a retro win xp computer but its a pain.I already have retro computers but wanted one a custom build
@@kyles8524 I used a Startech SATA to IDE which has its own set of jumpers on the PCB and it worked with the TUSL2-C motherboard. You also have to be careful not going over the 28-bit LBA. Anything larger than around 127GB doesn't work. Best to use hard drives that are 64GB or less in size.
@@thepcenthusiastchannel2300 yeah the smallest drive is 320gb the rest are 1 to 4 tbs. I technically do have drives but they are in finished 3dfx builds. ebat has them but for like 40 bucks.........
I know these videos have been out a while but I just got into retro building last year. I love this channel, LGR, and Nostalgia Nerd. Started out because I found some old software still tucked away from childhood(sadly my old hardware including my prized CT1600 Sound Blaster are long gone) so I went on the hunt for a 486 machine to build(now have 7 of them), and been building several different machines from 486 to socket 7 to super socket 7 and everything from Pentium up to Pentium 4.
I had an ATI Rage Pro 128 and upgraded to an STB Velocity 4400... straight up the Rage 128 had more consistent frame times and was a nicer playing experience.
The ATi Rage 128 is just a re-branded Tseng Labs ET6300. It's the last and fastest Tseng! Tseng was purchased by ATi in 1997. Their 3D graphics card, the ET6300, was released as the Rage 128 after the purchase.
I think you're thinking of the ATi Rage (Pro) not the Rage 128 (Pro)
You can probably do without the music. It gets old pretty fast.
The All in Wonder was such a great card. It was so easy to transfer camcorder video to the computer, to save for posterity & edit. If you had a super VHS camcorder, you could import high quality videos, edit them, then transfer them back to a super VHS VCR. You could also take VCR tapes & convert them into a shareable format, though RUclips was pretty new at the time.
As far as gaming performance, it was never it's strong point & let's just say I had a computer I used for multimedia stuff & another for more serious stuff & games. It was a bit disappointing, since I probably spent the most time on the multimedia PC. It was handy being able to watch TV on my desktop while I worked.
My first All In Wonder was a Rage II based card, and it was never really known for its 3d acceleration prowess. It was pretty slow, compared to the newer chipsets out there. All that changed with the All in Wonder Rage 128. For the first time, I could do everything on one machine, if I so chose. It also left my other machine open for LAN parties & competitive Descent. (1, 2 & 3)
The first time I saw Quake II on a Rage 128 Pro card I was completely blown away. I love this retro geek stuff. Great job on the review and thanks for doing it.
Great you liked it :D
Holy fog, my first 3D card!
I really like this card, playing DVD on a P200mmx was sorcery!
The 3D demo with egypsian stuff are freacking awesome.
Nice. The only demo I found was Rage Dawning.
Wasn't that demo for non pro version?
I've found the Rage 128/pro/ultra cards to be excellent DOS cards as well. This is a boat that AMD is really missing, HDMI capture capabilities. ATI was the leader in that category of video capture and output built in to their cards back in the 90's through the early 2000's. That was something that just came with their cards usually, except in OEM versions. Seems like AMD would sell a hell of a lot of cards with HDMI capture today.
Back in 2002, there abouts, I used an NEC desktop computer with a Celeron 333 chip in it as a HTPC, long before HTPC was a term that was used. I used the s-video output of a MX440 card to run to the TV. It worked, but I was really glad when I moved to LCD in 2007 and went with HDMI.
Lassi Kinnunen
128 Ultra scores higher in DOS benchmarks, fps, topbench etc.. than an S3, Voodoo, TNT2, Geforce. I've run the benchmarks, I know. Before I do a CPU comparison video I test video cards to see which one yields the highest scores for that platform and OS tested with.
I haven't tested this, but someone else on Vogons also found this. He is saying that the ATI card is the fastest at 320 x 200.
Oh and apparently at higher resolutions the results are reversed. I freely admit that I never looked much into high resolution DOS performance...
These cards are quite good and lasted for a while. There's a good reason Apple included them as the stock GPU on the PowerMac G3 and G4.
These videos are awesome. I wasn't quite able to do much with computers, let alone read what they said back when these cards were released, but I'm fond of old tech and this is a cool look back into what PCs were capable of before.
That's what it's all about :)
I used the ATi Rage 128 GL 16MB for many years. It came with my first 3D capable graphics card in my first PC Pentium _!!!_ 450 of my own. I later upgraded it to a ATi Radeon 256 DDR 64 MB ViVo
After this, I switched to the Green team with a GeForce 4 Ti 4600, 7800 GT, 8800GTX, GTX 570, GTX 780 Ti and currently a GTX 1080
Just a thing to keep in mind when running games in 32-bit on ATI games of the time, they actually run the z-buffer in 16-bit (not 100% sure it's the z-buffer, but they do get their boost because they still run some operations in 16-bit). Anyway, if my memory is correct, they were not competitive in 3D until they released Radeon cards.
Yes you're right, thanks for setting the record straight! I wasn't aware of this setting, it is called something along the lines "convert 32 bit textures to 16" and boosts performance, but doesn't look as nice. Unfortunately I used those settings. However, all the "new" videos and results I have changed this. So the videos with the GeForce 256 and anything in the future will have the correct 32 bit quality :)
My Radeon 9600 Pro has actually a jumper to switch the S-Video output between PAL and NTSC.
They were a solid card. Certain office brand PC's had a habit of including Rage128 cards with their systems, so we came into many back in the day. I remember testing a Rage 128 Ultra one time just out of curiosity as to how it stacked up and it played GP 500 amazingly well in 1024x768 32 bit colour. I mean it wasn't perfect, but it was playable and looked really nice.
I still remember finding one of these in a computer my mom got from work and being super excited.
Very cool, I have so many of these rage 128 pro cards around from the severely cut down cards to the fully loaded tv tuner all in wonder cards with the component inputs. There cool cards
I have an All-in-Wonder 128 pro. I actually like the image quality on this card more than on Voodoo2/3 cards :). It even supports tri-linear filtering, and the performance hit from using 32bpp isn't that bad.
I can see that, in 32 bit the ATI is nice and crisp.
Man, this video threw me back in time. I used to have this exact card back in the day, upgraded from a 16MB Vanta, and the thing felt like lightening in comparison, the VIVO functionality was great, as we could all sit and watch movies on our CRT TV which was vastly superior to the monitor i had (15'' Compaq) :D
I bought an ATI Rage 128 Pro 32mb PCI off ebay for $7 shipped because of this video, along with another $7.50 512mb SDRAM for a Pentium III workstation my uncle left me. It will be my first "retro build."
i had this gpu, ati rage rage 128 fury 32mb, non pro, it was great, yes 16bit always sucked, but 32bit wow. it ran even max payne 1, nfs porshe, with a good cpu it was a monster
I had the 16 bit, it somehow ran gta san andreas (64 bit min.) sometimes little buggy, vice city with ease which requires 32 bit card minimum, dunno what was going on then. .......... darrn i wasted precious hours of my life on that, then again, at least not wasting that of other's on here. So enough of this bye.
Ps Switched to more mature (i like to think so) titles, like golf, or brain deteriation repression training (something like that, don't quite remember). Anywho, bye.
@@Geert365 you must be crazy. i tried to run san andreas on a rage 128 pro agp and it was basically unplayable at lowest settings. i had to switch it with the 7000 or 7500 64mb in my other computer, i'm not smart enough to remember what that shitty GPU was. 64mb was the minimum for that game.
edit: jumping out of the plane was the spot that was unpassable with the ati rage 128 pro because of the extreme lag. jumping out to the plane graveyard...
san andreas is a very poorly optimized game though. it could have done alot better on older hardware but rockstar was a greedy corporation and put profit over optimization.
May be one of these days i will give it a go, was getting the old boy up and running again, see if i remembered it wrong then may be, but pretty sure , would a dual core with 8800 gt run it choppy at times, only other pc i used here. Real world priorities though, so no time soon (not that i think you , or anyone are anxiously awaiting any outcome of that). Quit gta, it's really about making money, like you said, and can really disrupt peoples lives i think, unless you are pretty well grounded on your feet. That discussion goes back to the eighties and movies (probably before that), gonna not touch that subject matter any further.
I'm kinda enjoying the background music in your historic videos.
I had the rage 128 fury with 2 Voodoo 2 cards, was a decent step up from my Matrox Millennium 2
This brings back memories :) Me, my ATi VIVO card and my 51 cm. CRT TV = Home Cinema in the early 2000s. Thanks so much for this video.
Your benchtable is adorable. :D
I'm huge fan of yours. Thanks a lot for bringing back memories,
cheers mate.
Thanks!
nice video! the card was a bit ahead of its time. I love old ATI.
Thank you!
Old-school pc hardware is wired.
I had geforce 2 gts at that time. Believe me I never looked back anymore
my first pc had a Ati all-in-wonder (rage 128), it was absolutely fantastic for the day. even having a small window overlay with live TV whilst playing a game or recording a program. it wasn't without its faults or quirks but on the whole did a good job and played many games for the time more than adequately with few driver issues.
Cool review! I love learning about old gpus and stuff.
Great that you liked it :D
I just got an old PC for free and this card was inside. There was also Asus P4XP-X motherboard inside and an old 1.8ghz Pentium 4, along with 256MB of RAM. And to my surprise, everything still works without a problem, but case was really dirty and old, so I threw it away. And yes, when I fired it up it went straight to Windows 2000. I might even build a retro gaming system with these parts in the future, since I saw that this motherboard is one of the best socket 478 motherboards around.
Phil you are a legend mate. I had no issues with the dvd player set to region 2 and away it went with nice play back. I'm using the xpert 2000 agp which is a variant based on the rage 128 chip.
Nice! Yes, I was pretty certain it was just this one machine being weird :D
the first video card I ever baught!!!
i had this card back in somewhere 2004 :D
I hab a friend in school he used it until 2005 ☝️😅
Well, we had no money back then but at this time was much happier with my Gf 4 Ti 4200 🙏
Your video's have inspired me to purchase some older parts to play my old DOS/Win98 games again. Have picked up a P4 2.8GHz, 256MB RAM, GeForce FX5500. Just trying to hunt down a cheap Vortex 2 card :)
That's awesome :)
14:00 - I noticed that the Voodoo 3 2000 was overall faster than the TNT2 Ultra.
Yes it's quite a good card, had great price per performance and a decent image quality for the time. Plus it also had a very clean open source driver support for Linux/mesa-3d and Amigaos/warp3d... good times
The ATI Theater chip was AMAZING. It was highly praised as a capture device in its day. The Theater 200 improved on this an was a very affordable option for recording svideo. You had to buy Matrox level equipment to get better capture. In fact I have a whole setup based on a P4 and a 850 XTPE that I use to record old VHS footage.
Nice! I have an AIW 8500, but the TV tuner stuff is now obsolete :) The capturing especially would have been quite a cool thing, like you say.
I remember this card.It was my first graphic card. I play even battle for middle earth on low.
My high school had these in their Dell PCs which were used for C++ and CAD/ Drafting classes and these cards were quite good when we did CAD work. Sadly they were locked down so much that we couldn't do much else with the PC which meant games and videos were out of the question. On occasion we would have internet access but still heavily restricted...
I still have my ATI Rage 128 Ultra AGP. It's great for late 90s gaming. Mine came with my very first PC in late 2001. Unfortunately I didn't get much mileage out of it in terms of early-mid 00s gaming, for obvious reasons.
My first ever gaming pc: K6-2/350 and a 32mb Rage 128 Pro. Upgraded to it just in time for Everquest to come out and it played that game for thousands of hours. Plus the OpenGL? Glide? (I fogot) support in Quake was pretty darn good as far as I can remember.
Glide was 3dfx, OpenGL were the rest, ati ogl drivers sucked hard for years, but stull they worked fine for the quake3 era, but in 2000- 2008 they were lame
I have an ATI Rage Pro Turbo AGP that I never tried, but you inspired me to try it in one of my Asus P3V4X computers.
I wound up using an installation disc from a Rage Pro 128 PCI card. It worked perfectly and it installed a DVD player too.
It has nice image quality and I think the performance in between a Voodoo3 and a Banshee.
I think I will add a Voodoo2 or two... ;)
Thx for this video. One point- please use benchmarks with not more than 5 cards. Otherwise the letters are so small that noone is able tp read the names. Thx. But the video and commentation ist great. Today i build up a celeron 333a system with such a card (gigabyte gv-ag32as) on a asus p2b bx440 board. I use it for gaming with games from the time the celeron was an actual cpu. From my experience the card is a worthy opponent to a riva TNT, especially in 32bit. You will get them very cheap at ebay(which isn't true for TNT cards). Important is to look at the memory interface. Try to get a GL type. They got 128bit memory bandwidth and not 64bit like the LE models
nice and interesting video, like all you upload to this channel :D (sorry by my bad english LOL), you make me want to continue my project of building a P1 88Mhz pc with DOS
Thank you :)
like the ATI 8500 it's a beast with directx 8.1 and lower games. also i see your new house is looking well.
Thanks. I'm still sorting stuff out. I got to find a few things still in boxes...
Ive actually got one of these Rage 128 cards with 32mb of VRAM , The performance isn't too bad and the image quality is good (not quite to Matrox standards, but good). The main flaw of course is that , like the Nvidia , its somewhat generic, since there is no support for Glide or something unique like EMBM or S3 Compressed textures.
in my mind the ideal setup for this card would be to have it run alongside a Voodoo2 SLI setup . You can have the V2 for Glide and sheer speed in 16bit colour games, and the Rage 128 can act as the main card for games that benefit from 32bit colour or the higher amounts of VRAM (the image quality and overall DOS performance makes it suitable too)
It does support compressed textures (DXTC), but I'm not sure about EMBM. The driver mentions nothing about this.
guess you learn something new every day , didnt think any texture compression was supported.
its a good card for a Pentium II or early PIII
You know, thinking about it I almost wonder if nVidia didn’t name the GeForce256 such so that they could one up ATi.
Great video as always Phil, but the Moiré pattern is very prominent in nearly the entire video, although from 20:04 onward the Moiré pattern seems completely gone.
I thought that was only an issue when you film an old CRT monitor with a cheap digital camera, but here you're using an LCD all the time. I found that little strange because LCD's usually have a default refresh rate of 60 Hz and use a completely different digital technology.
Moire is an issue with fine lines / patterns, not refresh rate.
man i admire your persistence or will if you wish. how old are you if i may? i wasnt so impressed with nvidias cards till GF256
ironic, the cards at the time were held back by driver issues, but as time has gone on they've only got stronger
i was like where is the TV input encoder ,but this isnt the all in wonder version ?
You mean the TV tuner? Yea this isn't the AIW version like you say :)
Any ideas as to why this card performs better with 32bit colors than 16bit? It seems a little odd to me.
Bad Drivers at launch
I swapped this back and forth a few times with the tnt2ultra because of drivers and game support back in the day.
I used to love ATI cards back in the day - although I never used one of this specific generation (I was running S3 cards on my K6/K6-2 builds), I upgraded a Geforce 2Ti with a Radeon 8500 on my AthlonXP and was immediately amazed by how much sharper and clearer the picture was (this was a time when nVidia still had crappy picture quality, which went away with the GeForce4 series).
That said, the Rage128Pro is an utter mess - it's not really the performances (which are a bit of a letdown) but the fact there existed a bazillion cheap&crap version of this card, mostly peddled on office-grade builds, which makes it nigh-on-impossible to actually find a good one with the promised 128-bit bus. I have probably 5 or 6 of these, all marked differently (Rage 128, Rage 128Pro, Rage128Ultra etc), with visibly different PCBs (some are the famous "L" shaped, some square and red or green) and they ALL are 64-bit, all with the exact same (bad) performances. One of them is a Gigabyte GV-AG32S, which on the Gigabyte website shows as specification of 128-bit...and it's 64-bit, same exact performances as the basic "L" shape cards extracted from some 2000 MS-Word machine.
So yeah, if you're building a retro-machine of this era, I wouldn't bother with this card, unfortunately :/
Great video Phil. Just a tip: that overall comparison you did where you summed all the framerates together to get an overall score is not an ideal statistic, since it's easily skewed by extreme results. A much better statistic would be to use the median framerate for a a particular colour depth.
Hmm, but each game performs differently, so how would the median work? It's just a rough figure, and apart from the few odd results (looking at Earth on the TNT2), it works quite well.
+PhilsComputerLab we had our little debate about this on Facebook, but to me, the median of a collection of average framerates (for different games) would indicate to me what a base level performance for the card would be in any random game. If we have a median average framerate of say 40 fps, then in my mind, I would expect that 50% of the time I'll have an average framerate of 40 fps or less and 50% of the time I'll have an average framerate of 40 or more. You could also calculate the 5th percentile to get an idea of what the absolute worst performance one could expect be.
PS thanks for reading out the benchmarks it makes a huge difference :)
It does? Cool, I can continue doing that!
13:48 You shouldn't be adding FPS numbers from different benchmarks. You should do instead a geometric mean.
Order the charts, it helps to understand
I really like the older ATI cards, my Pentium 3 setup has an All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 128mb, and it has some pretty good multimedia functions like a tv tuner, ect.
Me too. They are not used often, most go for 3dfx or Nvidia. But whenever I try them out, I have a good experience.
The reason you want to restart your PC in W9x after color depth change is to make the interface look better
I love video cards with composite video output...
yeah thats the shit
Time to replay Quake II.
How much better is the Rage 128 Pro vs. the Rage 128? Is it slightly better or is it a big jump like going from a TNT to a TNT2?
19:00 it depended on the receiving tv, what signal you could output. i remember it on my rage 128, because i used to subtitle anime to german and output it to my tv and vcr. and because only few anime i had were pal i had to switch it often to ntsc, which worked.
Wonder if you will do a review of ATI Rage 3D Pro. Way back in 1998 I've had a PC with that graphics card and it couldn't do OpenGL at all, had to rely on Pentium 2 i believe to do the work along with that in games to get some decent performance...Do note that there has been some driver revision just for that GPU.
That card should be OpenGL compatible. We will check it out in a future video, so stay tuned :)
I have the All in Wonder version well because I desired the TV tuner and recording functionality for recording TV shows and making video CD's (or DVD's) of them.
Nice! I guess the TV tuner will come in handy for capturing older consoles. Soon devices won't have any analogue tuners, so hang on to that card.
I had Rage Fury Maxx with 500mhz Celeron and Windows ME. Those where the times...
This was my very first 3D acceleration video card :)
Bough it to my Athlon 3200 XP+ to play Doom 3
It ran Doom 3 :O
That must've been a horrible experience...
PhilsComputerLab
It did, with HUGE lag :P
But then again i'm the girl who played Quake at a 486DX2 back in the day
+Vannessa .. Same :P 486Dx2 66mhz
+GengarTV Same here, on 486DX2 80MHz :)
Also, I finished Rune on an unclocked Cely 300A and an 4MB S3 Virge DX, fun times :D
help. I'm looking for an ISA or PCI display card that supports composite mono monitor. I tried VGA to composite converter, text are blurry and dark. but if I run something in QBasic with Screen 8, the text is sharp and clear
Ive got exactly same card + voodoo2
My retro ATI card of choice would be the Radeon 9000/9200. But that might be because I used one of those as my main gaming card for a while back then. :) Anyways, should be faster than the Rage, have better D3D/OGL compatibility, and yet still fully passive cooling.
As 9200 is the card I stuck with for the most years of owning a computer, I can simpathise, but after switching to 9700 on one of my AMD rigs and testing it out, I liked it more for the sheer power it produces in 1997.-2006. oriented gaming - its fast, rock-solid, colder than most 9200's and easily obtainable.
Great card. I tried a 9200 in Windows 98 once and it's a very fast card. Better suited for Windows XP to be honest.
Card in my PowerMac G4-Cube ;-)
Didn't you encounter any rendering artifacts with this ATI Rage 128? It was infamous for that problem. I'll usually avoid this card along with ATI's earlier Rage Pro and Rage Pro Turbo (both also infamous for rendering artifacts and issues).
Idk, I ran the pro as well as the 128 in some of my junk builds and never had very much issue outside of the drivers at the time. They do need airflow though - that passive cooler isn't anywhere near adequate in a poorly ventilated case.
I always wondered what the differences between the different cards with Rage128 chipsets were.
I recently bought an "ATI Xpert2000 Pro Ultra 32M"
For some reason none of the drivers from the AMD site worked. I needed to force it to install a driver called "ATI Rage Fury Pro / Xpert2000 Pro" out of said AMD driver using infs. Works fine though.
My iMac G3 has a 128 Pro, and for the machine it is a GREAT card. You have to understand this is a 400 something mhz PPC (Slower than a similarly clocked Pentium, by a lot), but it rocks games like quake just fine. It's a great machine for older games and 68k emulation on OS9 is pretty decent.
Oh, and to add, DVD playback is also flaky HARDWARE on the Mac. It has a DVD drive, but a new disc like the Titanic it stumbles and just jumps ahead more than a reasonable skip would often.
Cool, thanks for sharing. I know little about the Apple world, so this is nice to know.
PhilsComputerLab Honestly they are very similar to PCs of the day, especially some of the earlier power macs. They use Power PC, which is a RISC based CPU (Meaning while the IPS per clock is better than a CISC machine, the amount of work an instruction can do is severely reduced. So going from MIPS to MIPS count on a PPC to a Pentium, a Pentium will easily smoke it, and CISC based CPUs have really caught up to RISC to the point where there is no competition) over x86 CISC, but they still had PCI, (Idk if they had AGP) and some of the later G5s even had PCI-E support.
I suggest you toy around with mac gaming, and check our Druaga1's content, he has a lot of mac stuff, and even LGR has some content.
I suggest for retro Power Macintosh gaming you either go with a G3 box, or an iMac G3 Summer 2000 DV+ model (I have it). The G3 box has more expansion options, but the iMac may be easier to find, and it is a great all round machine.
For 68k Gaming, check out what the latest one is, I think it was a performa of some sort. They aren't fast and are on the levels of 386s on clock for clock.
For older Power Macintosh gaming, get one of the dual CPU (I think dual core even on top of that) G5 towers. Very loud, but they are as good as a power mac will get.
Emulation IS an option, but not a very good one in my opinion.
If you need any more info I definitely have one, or check our Druaga1, or LGR's content.
I am currently on your Matrox G400 and I have yet to find a video I disliked. If you ever need help I do have some resources, I am currently cobbling together a DX4-100 @120 machine, that is pretty period accurate down, even though it's a tad OP.
Your charts are not retro enough, watch the 8-bit guys charts!
I expect a downgrade mister!
I threw away my Rage 128 Pro a long time ago and I really wish I hadn't
I still have one in my closet (I'm 16 years old and I have used a system with this gpu in it shortly before the pentium III in it died and believe me, beautiful experience in older games).
I just took out the GPU and i am using it as my keychain
Me too. It is a great retro card, it just works fine. Like nvidia tnt or voodoo.
Just ordered a rage 128 pro pci for a old aptiva (k6-2) without agp slot . The 128 pro will replace the integrated rage pro lol
Recently tested the card and would advice against using the latest drivers as I had visual glitches in Quake II and Half-Life (texture flicker). Tried 6XXX drivers and the glitches were gone. Even got better performance by few frames.
I might be wrong, but I think there is usually a jumper that sets PAC/NTSC on ATi cards?
@@phipli You are right! Many cards indeed have such a jumper to configure the TV out standard.
Do you have a video on the ATI 3D Rage Pro II PCI ?
I was actually going to buy one recently (along with a Voodo2) and do a build. But since I salvaged a working (and good as new with SLI cable) Diamond Monster 3D II+Diamond Viper V550 from a computer that was going to get scrapped I ended up not going with it.
Have you checked gpu/memory clocks on your card? ATI claimed 140/160 for Pro version. I've seen only 112/125 and 125/143 variants. Fully fledged version come up only in some early reviews on the internet.
PowerStrip reports 118 MHz for the core and 140 MHz for the memory.
Just got this card today for 5€ :D
Mine came with a TV tuner also.
Phil could you do a review of a ATI Rage XL pci ? cheers
do u have video review about amd cpu thunderbird
Back then, I got this card integrated into a brand new PC of 1999 or so. I hated it and got a GeForce ASAP.
What did you hate about it? Driver issues?
The OpenGL ICD was not so good compared to nvidia.
I see. Matrox also struggled with OpenGL. Nvidia and 3dfx seem to do well with OpenGL.
I have to correct myself - the infamous card was a Rage Pro.
The Rage Pro 128 is a good chip. It's basically a Tseng ET 6300.
I fucking hated owning an old computer with this graphics card in the 2000s. I mean, yeah, it could play UT99, but nothing more advanced. I would run whatever XPlane was current back then at like 5 FPS.
If anyone is looking for a good retro card, this one is good. I had it since 99-2006 and played a lot. Not a single issue, all games had every 3d feature correctly (unlike shit s3 Matrox etc), 32bit was awesome, svideo to composite allowed 1024*768 output, dvd playback on the gpu, 32mb was over the average. The only bad thing was the 16bit performance at first, the tnt2 is faster overall and the voodoo3 could be another great option but only 16bit and 16mb lol. Games i played: max payne, ff7-8, epsxe emulator, quake 2, every tomb raider 1-5, drakan, soldier of fortune, forsaken, nfs 2,3,4,5. Even gta vice city (ultra slow, but i had a shit celeron 333-400 lol, darkstone, quake 3, ut99, mdk 1 2. Ati always has crap drivers at first then they mature a lot, the drivers were 12mb. It was awesome in winme xp. Love this gpu, i wish stupid me never had sold it for pennies
Thank you for sharing 😊
i have one of these cards laying around. it is the pci version. im going to put it in a board with an amd k2 475mhz. not sure if i will have any issues but that the fun part.
PCI cards are harder to find, so that's great :)
Can it play Resident Evil 2 on Win98 ? :D
i wonder if the ATI Rage 128 ultra can be use as a substitute, the only difference is that the Ultra has a Core clock of 130MHz and a Memory clock of 130MHz and a Bandwidth of 2.088, but the drives are not on AMD website well least for me for me any way.
i had to get the drivers from dell.
Yup the Ultra is a classic OEM version. You can either force the driver through device manager, or edit the driver (INF file) to accept the dell card.
When playing a dvd you had trouble getting it to work I noticed the old look to the buttons on right of the screen those are the original drivers and software later ATI released updates ver. 5 and so on it had a polished look to the interface brushed steel and back then ATI often had trouble with drivers and software issues that were later fixed in updates I did video capture on a Radion 8500 and later 9000 card converting all my home movies from VHS to CD-R in VCD format I recall test recording many different formats to encode for the best HQ playback it was tedious process but necessary for a noob to it when I was done some months later I had 15yrs worth of home memories on cd that would play in my dvd player not all players had all supported formats that by the way is the sign of a good dvd player is how many different formats it will support it avoids problems watching your favorite new release like your video .
Thank you for sharing your experiences!
is the rage pro good for a pentium 2. 300mhz retro maching build with vortex 2 or go with something else?
Beastie card for the time. I had one.
I've got an Ati Rage 128 Pro too but mine only has VGA and the PCB is smaller and has another form. Are there different versions of it or am I wrong?
There are indeed all sorts of version. I looked around quite a bit, in the end I payed a premium to get this card. It seems to be an early version with all the features included.
Ok, I didn't know that. Thanks for your fast reply!