When the teacher or the judgemental panel is tellimg contimuosly to describe ythe situation whats the accised and the person presemt is related and how the ssituations all preceeded it should be so that the whole situation to be described well so that the situations can be clear enough and the describer should always be confident enough to link two factors the allegations or the accusitions amd the ultimat result. He should always be confident enough to describe the situation so well so that the fight sud always be on the chargesheet or the aftermath and the ultimate result how to move and proceed and who is wrong or allegated.
They failed to prove that the intentions of the person was not right, as as long as the motive/intentions of the person are questionable, the actions will be too!
The allegator cannot describe the meaning of ruthless well it shows. How ot cam be the lawyer is describing the bejaviour well but the allegator is silent and with less confident in describeing her hard and fasts rules in the company or in front of the director. The lawyer should be presidented enough to allow the allegator to describe each and every situations amd then gets the movement onnnn by showing that his or her point is correct enough. Here what matter is proving the points correctly and with greater extent. Here the main allegation is ruthlessness and the ambition so it should be described and linked only in and around to that situation. The lqsts lasts guy who acted lawyer was not well tehearsed he was not been unable to understand the imvwstigative terms. The investogative officer who learnt the bullets described well but so much description or describe is not needed. If anything is asked abt the bullet whats required to know in this particular situation that from where or in which guns this bullet will be used and where these guns are found in the locality or in the state or in the country, where the same guns are uswd and how it affects the dead person means within how much time the person die and the heart stops. So much terms and how the bullet got inside and affected the tissues are not required. Specifical nd conductive terms are required which will save the time of the court and the visitors. Few people were laughing those who are visitors as they are unable to understand those terms amd how the bullets got inside. Thankuou.
This last guy Look Lose his Energy And could not Give Answer to his Senioer ... And also he does not know how to ask the question s to girl. 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Really very good argument....with both parties....well done.👏🏻
Fantastic initiative 👌
Fantastic Initiative
When the teacher or the judgemental panel is tellimg contimuosly to describe ythe situation whats the accised and the person presemt is related and how the ssituations all preceeded it should be so that the whole situation to be described well so that the situations can be clear enough and the describer should always be confident enough to link two factors the allegations or the accusitions amd the ultimat result. He should always be confident enough to describe the situation so well so that the fight sud always be on the chargesheet or the aftermath and the ultimate result how to move and proceed and who is wrong or allegated.
14:00
I fell for her She is so confident @ 14:0
0:01 who’s he?
A boy
RUclipsr
Kaun si University hai you
Is there any bachelor of BA.LLB ?
✊
Yes
Their mics are so low
I came here for 17:25
Kanishka Agarwal me2
Same✨✨😂
who fucking cares
@kanishka agarwal hello bro..
I finally found a name like mine!
They failed to prove that the intentions of the person was not right, as as long as the motive/intentions of the person are questionable, the actions will be too!
The allegator cannot describe the meaning of ruthless well it shows. How ot cam be the lawyer is describing the bejaviour well but the allegator is silent and with less confident in describeing her hard and fasts rules in the company or in front of the director.
The lawyer should be presidented enough to allow the allegator to describe each and every situations amd then gets the movement onnnn by showing that his or her point is correct enough. Here what matter is proving the points correctly and with greater extent.
Here the main allegation is ruthlessness and the ambition so it should be described and linked only in and around to that situation.
The lqsts lasts guy who acted lawyer was not well tehearsed he was not been unable to understand the imvwstigative terms. The investogative officer who learnt the bullets described well but so much description or describe is not needed. If anything is asked abt the bullet whats required to know in this particular situation that from where or in which guns this bullet will be used and where these guns are found in the locality or in the state or in the country, where the same guns are uswd and how it affects the dead person means within how much time the person die and the heart stops. So much terms and how the bullet got inside and affected the tissues are not required. Specifical nd conductive terms are required which will save the time of the court and the visitors. Few people were laughing those who are visitors as they are unable to understand those terms amd how the bullets got inside.
Thankuou.
Bodacious
Courts differ it's not drama
i will be there
If you told the case how is the allegation
445 attachments to act of sections
Aao kbhi allahabad law faculty me
It is far better than
allahabad law faculty
This last guy Look Lose his Energy And could not Give Answer to his Senioer ... And also he does not know how to ask the question s to girl. 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
Who made him Advocate He does not have Good Energetic .. Way
He will improve bro and plse keep quiet it takes time
👍
Justs waste 5-10 minutes time as the guy has not described the situation well.