Heimler, you are literally the GOAT, you helped me with AP World to get a 4, and now with my APUSH exam in less than 5 days I feel more ready than ever.
You have great reason for this, trickle-down is widely criticized as ineffective by economic professionals. It has only hurt the American people, just as Regan did.
But it's objectively how the economy works... look at all the big corporations they share the wealth all the way down to skill-less employees flipping burgers
Heimler thank you for these videos. They have changed my year, made it enjoyable, and helped me to love history. These videos have made me confident for my exam tomorrow and I can't thank you enough. Keep it up!
It’s because on the AP exam there’s only like 2-3 questions talking about Unit 9 and the unit is known to be generally short. There usually isn’t any SAQ, LEQ, or DBQ covering or speaking on Period 9 either.
if you ever take gov, they come in clutch. i did ap gov and apush at the same time and I am so bad at apush- but the court cases from gov are SO useful on tests. i recommend taking at some point in your high school experience
What happened to conversing in complete sentences? Anyway, take a further look into conservative policy and why they’re important. Also, take a look at Pastor John MacArthur’s sermons for good insight on the current day from God’s Word. God Bless you.
Right sure. I should have my savings given to government instead of my children. Because I'm rich for saving 90k for them. F off saying it's only a rich tax.
Not really. Our teacher explained to our class that most events as recent as 50 years ago will tend to be biased. That's why APUSH doesn't ask LEQs or DBQs on unit 9. There is also likely only 3 to 4 MCQs on the test as well.
That has never been possible lmao. Literally one of the key points that we are taught in APUSH is that all of history is biased in some way, shape, or form. While not all biases are inherently bad it doesn’t change the fact that they are still there. Personally, I feel like Heimler did a pretty good job in giving the facts required to know for the APUSH test.
2:44 Paul Harvey coined "Reaganomics," not Reagan. Also, at 2:54 it is misleading at best to visually describe supply-side economics with a "Trickle-down" political cartoon by an opponent of supply-side economics. That is how an opponent of supply-side economics would describe supply-side economics-not how an objective observer would and certainly not a supporter. In fact, why not show a critical political cartoon along with a supportive political cartoon side-by-side to show divergent perspectives? Double Fact Check at 3:18: 1) Reagan never argued for "Trickle down" economics (indeed, he never even uttered that phrase) and 2) no such theory even exists. As economist Thomas Sowell explains, "The 'trickle-down' theory cannot be found in even the most voluminous scholarly studies of economic theories -- including J.A. Schumpeter's monumental 'History of Economic Analysis,' more than a thousand pages long and printed in very small type." It is revealing, however, that he uses a phrase ("Trickle Down economics") invented by Reagan's Democratic opponents from the 1980s to describe Reagan's policies instead of the objective "supply-side economics." 3:39 is misleading. Its stated that, "All you really need to know is that these are taxes that the very wealthy have to contend with." This gives the false impression of Reagan as a President who only cared about "the very wealthy." This is especially misleading because right before that it is stated at 3:29 that "it [the ERTA] cut income taxes by twenty five percent over the next three years." In short, it gives the false impression that this only benefited "the very wealthy." From 3:49 on this is where the author's hand is really revealed: gone are the attempts at unbiased teaching. We see the anti-supply side economics political cartoon/caricature presented on-screen along with a straw man description of supply-side economics at 3:51: "if the top tier are prosperous then that prosperity will trickle down to others.” Who is he quoting for that straw man description? No sources are ever cited in the video or the description. At 3:44 he repeats the claim of Reagan's Democratic opponents that "the wealthy disproportionately benefited from those Reagan-era tax cuts." At 3:55 he does something very interesting at two levels: First, he reverses his role of critic to one of defender by randomly stating "Before you go canceling Reagan over that [Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981]..." This allows him to appear as a non-partisan and objective educator with no bias. Given his comments up to this point, we can safely deduce that he is not. Second, why would Reagan get "Cancelled"? This is actually a telling thing to say. People get "cancelled" for saying and doing controversial things. For instance, imagine a politician was at a private dinner with donors and was secretly recorded saying something racist. "Cancelling" someone implies that something was said or done that was controversial. Thus, the idea of Reagan getting "cancelled" for passing tax reduction is analogous to a Freudian slip; there is nothing to "cancel" for having honest policy differences, but the fact that he brings it up is telling of what he thinks. 4:09 is the tired "Reagan hates the poor but not the military" line we hear ad nauseum, which is also repeated at 4:48. Here's the bottom line: It is fine to believe all of this! But, from one history teacher to another, please do not present yourself as an unbiased history teacher. Explain to students that historians and economists disagree about these issues, as well as what your opinions on debatable subjects are. Oh, and it never hurts to cite your sources. P.S. It was not my intention to fact-check this video in such detail, but I kept noticing issues throughout. I think this channel does wonderful things, but I could not be silent when I kept hearing opinion presented as fact.
Wow, wonderful response, Mr. Goldsmith! I admire Sowell as well. You’re points are great, the mainstream media liberal propaganda-based agenda creeps into many aspects of thought, especially educational material. Although, I’ve personally gotten pretty tired of the term “fact check” as it’s tremendously overused by far-left organizations. God bless you, and take a look at IW with Alex J (trying to get get cnsrd by AI, I’m sure you can figure out what that stands for) and Pastor John MacArthur for great, relevant sermons for our day. Brian
how is his policy not controversial? how is it not cancellable? economic policy is just as- or even more- impactful and detrimental to different groups of people as any other policy, I don’t see why you couldn’t “cancel” or seriously criticize someone for harming the poor and working class- that’s just as bad as harming any other disadvantaged group, is it not? economic policy differences are not “honest policy differences” any more than social issue are honest policy differences, both can cause significant harm to groups that are already disadvantaged.
Great channel although as Thomas Sowell has challenged, nobody on the right ever claimed Reaganomics was “the trickle down economics” and put up a cash reward to the person who could identify the source of this phrase to which nobody could find and Sowell never had to pay out. Thanks for your great content although I graduated 35+ years ago, I love to watch AP classes that I wasn’t able to qualify for in my day but my post high school life, once I began college, has been dominated by learning especially history.
its crazy how as the ap test gets closer you can see his subscriber count increase lol
lowkey happened over yesterday and today and i saw it increase 3k 🥴
Heimler, you are literally the GOAT, you helped me with AP World to get a 4, and now with my APUSH exam in less than 5 days I feel more ready than ever.
Cramming too, eh? Astonishing how procrastination gives you uncanny willpower to study :)
@@Apeulu for real bro
what did you end up getting?
Right!!!! He makes it fun and pay attention.
APUSH test tomorrow… BRING IT ON
praying we get 5's
Me too! Good luck all!
bruh my teacher didnt even teach us everything im doomed ToT
i might be dumb but at least i dont believe in trickle down economics 🙏
You have great reason for this, trickle-down is widely criticized as ineffective by economic professionals. It has only hurt the American people, just as Regan did.
Ronald Reagan In Hell waiting for heaven to trickle down
Fr 😭😭😭
But it's objectively how the economy works... look at all the big corporations they share the wealth all the way down to skill-less employees flipping burgers
@@lechnisbro where’s my money then?
the time to watch these videos again have come again,
one day before the exam
yuppp
How about 2 1/2 hrs before?
how'd you do?
My class never got to Reagan last year cuz of covid :’). Great video!
Same
Dont lose hope, my friends. It is tomorrow, yes, but we shall prevail. have no fear. may 5th is but one day.
Heimler thank you for these videos. They have changed my year, made it enjoyable, and helped me to love history. These videos have made me confident for my exam tomorrow and I can't thank you enough. Keep it up!
hope we all get 5’s 🙏
I havent rlly read any of the chapters & I just realized my AP test is in like 3 weeks😭
This man deserves a nobel prize
these videos' views wil skyrocket exam time lol
he rly missed the chance to say “brain cows milked trickle down style”
Ugh, my class is still on Unit 7. 😭
same
We have the exam tmr and haven’t even learned all of period 7 💀
I remember watching this last year, your videos helped so much Heimler thank you 🙏🏿
my teacher didn't cover this unit and no one in my class knew it existed aaaaaaaaaaaa thank you for the video
It’s because on the AP exam there’s only like 2-3 questions talking about Unit 9 and the unit is known to be generally short. There usually isn’t any SAQ, LEQ, or DBQ covering or speaking on Period 9 either.
APUSH exam next week! Wish me luck ❤
Ronald Reagan? The actor? Then who’s Vice President? Jerry Lewis?
GREAT SCOTT!
Back to the Future reference, right?
Starting with what I know least and working backwards. Meet you all in unit 2 when I’m done. Test is tomorrow
I watched all of these units the day before my exam…
bru same
Love the little light-hearted jokes at the beginning of the past two vids
last second studying 😀
it may or may not be 2 hours til my exam
i will never respect reagan for anything
but this video was still amazing as always king!
thanks so much for your videos! so helpful!
still here after the ap exam… because my teacher has a test on this unit
Bru wasn’t there a whole dbq on this topic if they do that kinda thing again we doneeeee
The test is today watch all unit 9, cramming it in (((^_^;)
HAPPY EXAM DAY EVERYONE
You got me. I've subscribed.
I cannot actually smell the end, as I am watching a video, and I am not actually near the end.
It’s time
Wow such a great video
Will you post new AP Government videos? I heard you say the other ones were when you were in your yelling phase. Lol
Yeah, I'm going to spend next year updating those....
Ok.
@@heimlershistory Can't wait!
should i watch all of the vids then the review video or just the review video for each APUSH topic?
Anyone know why there's a dip in military defense spending near 1976?
where can I access your review packet? Please answer
www.ultimatereviewpacket.com
Hi besties good luck
thanks you too
Is it normal that I’m learning about Supreme Court cases in US history class
I mean, yeah, there are a few big ones in the curriculum like Plessy, Brown, Marbury, etc...
Yeah because the ones you’re probably learning about were really influential in history. 😊
Definitely
if you ever take gov, they come in clutch. i did ap gov and apush at the same time and I am so bad at apush- but the court cases from gov are SO useful on tests. i recommend taking at some point in your high school experience
very poggers heimler my brain cow was milked
🥰
physical discomfort 😖
Best president of my lifetime.
bro is an conservative 💀 6:06
I agree Joe.
This man on top of us seems rather woke to me.
What happened to conversing in complete sentences? Anyway, take a further look into conservative policy and why they’re important. Also, take a look at Pastor John MacArthur’s sermons for good insight on the current day from God’s Word. God Bless you.
@@brian791I never said being an conservative is bad. I just had to add daddy Heimler's jokes in. Sorry if it offended you.
anyone here in 2024 studying last minute? 😭
Right sure. I should have my savings given to government instead of my children. Because I'm rich for saving 90k for them. F off saying it's only a rich tax.
It's unbelievable that no one can teach history objectively anymore.
Not really. Our teacher explained to our class that most events as recent as 50 years ago will tend to be biased.
That's why APUSH doesn't ask LEQs or DBQs on unit 9. There is also likely only 3 to 4 MCQs on the test as well.
That has never been possible lmao. Literally one of the key points that we are taught in APUSH is that all of history is biased in some way, shape, or form.
While not all biases are inherently bad it doesn’t change the fact that they are still there.
Personally, I feel like Heimler did a pretty good job in giving the facts required to know for the APUSH test.
No mention that Reagan defeated inflation- the most insidious demoralising curse any country can have.
test in 2 hours check
2:44 Paul Harvey coined "Reaganomics," not Reagan. Also, at 2:54 it is misleading at best to visually describe supply-side economics with a "Trickle-down" political cartoon by an opponent of supply-side economics. That is how an opponent of supply-side economics would describe supply-side economics-not how an objective observer would and certainly not a supporter. In fact, why not show a critical political cartoon along with a supportive political cartoon side-by-side to show divergent perspectives? Double Fact Check at 3:18: 1) Reagan never argued for "Trickle down" economics (indeed, he never even uttered that phrase) and 2) no such theory even exists. As economist Thomas Sowell explains, "The 'trickle-down' theory cannot be found in even the most voluminous scholarly studies of economic theories -- including J.A. Schumpeter's monumental 'History of Economic Analysis,' more than a thousand pages long and printed in very small type." It is revealing, however, that he uses a phrase ("Trickle Down economics") invented by Reagan's Democratic opponents from the 1980s to describe Reagan's policies instead of the objective "supply-side economics." 3:39 is misleading. Its stated that, "All you really need to know is that these are taxes that the very wealthy have to contend with." This gives the false impression of Reagan as a President who only cared about "the very wealthy." This is especially misleading because right before that it is stated at 3:29 that "it [the ERTA] cut income taxes by twenty five percent over the next three years." In short, it gives the false impression that this only benefited "the very wealthy." From 3:49 on this is where the author's hand is really revealed: gone are the attempts at unbiased teaching. We see the anti-supply side economics political cartoon/caricature presented on-screen along with a straw man description of supply-side economics at 3:51: "if the top tier are prosperous then that prosperity will trickle down to others.” Who is he quoting for that straw man description? No sources are ever cited in the video or the description. At 3:44 he repeats the claim of Reagan's Democratic opponents that "the wealthy disproportionately benefited from those Reagan-era tax cuts." At 3:55 he does something very interesting at two levels: First, he reverses his role of critic to one of defender by randomly stating "Before you go canceling Reagan over that [Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981]..." This allows him to appear as a non-partisan and objective educator with no bias. Given his comments up to this point, we can safely deduce that he is not. Second, why would Reagan get "Cancelled"? This is actually a telling thing to say. People get "cancelled" for saying and doing controversial things. For instance, imagine a politician was at a private dinner with donors and was secretly recorded saying something racist. "Cancelling" someone implies that something was said or done that was controversial. Thus, the idea of Reagan getting "cancelled" for passing tax reduction is analogous to a Freudian slip; there is nothing to "cancel" for having honest policy differences, but the fact that he brings it up is telling of what he thinks. 4:09 is the tired "Reagan hates the poor but not the military" line we hear ad nauseum, which is also repeated at 4:48.
Here's the bottom line: It is fine to believe all of this! But, from one history teacher to another, please do not present yourself as an unbiased history teacher. Explain to students that historians and economists disagree about these issues, as well as what your opinions on debatable subjects are. Oh, and it never hurts to cite your sources.
P.S. It was not my intention to fact-check this video in such detail, but I kept noticing issues throughout. I think this channel does wonderful things, but I could not be silent when I kept hearing opinion presented as fact.
Wow, wonderful response, Mr. Goldsmith! I admire Sowell as well. You’re points are great, the mainstream media liberal propaganda-based agenda creeps into many aspects of thought, especially educational material. Although, I’ve personally gotten pretty tired of the term “fact check” as it’s tremendously overused by far-left organizations. God bless you, and take a look at IW with Alex J (trying to get get cnsrd by AI, I’m sure you can figure out what that stands for) and Pastor John MacArthur for great, relevant sermons for our day.
Brian
Okay Sir. Then what was Reagan all about then? What was he hoping for, and did he achieve that?
how is his policy not controversial? how is it not cancellable?
economic policy is just as- or even more- impactful and detrimental to different groups of people as any other policy, I don’t see why you couldn’t “cancel” or seriously criticize someone for harming the poor and working class- that’s just as bad as harming any other disadvantaged group, is it not?
economic policy differences are not “honest policy differences” any more than social issue are honest policy differences, both can cause significant harm to groups that are already disadvantaged.
whose taxes did he cut.
scalia be ruining everything rn
He's literally dead...
ur a life saver. u dont get it
who else crammed all his videos the day before the exam and finally got here...
one answer
three letters
Y E S
watching this less than 24 hours before the exam lets go 💪💪💪🙏🙏
Started watching your videos on D-3 of the exam... Tomorrow is the exam and I reached here. Thanks Heimer! I will return with a 5
Great channel although as Thomas Sowell has challenged, nobody on the right ever claimed Reaganomics was “the trickle down economics” and put up a cash reward to the person who could identify the source of this phrase to which nobody could find and Sowell never had to pay out.
Thanks for your great content although I graduated 35+ years ago, I love to watch AP classes that I wasn’t able to qualify for in my day but my post high school life, once I began college, has been dominated by learning especially history.
braincows overmilked
we didn't get to learn unit 9 due to time crunches, im watching this the morning of the exam, thank god
Is it weird that I've been commenting on these since unit 1?
No way... keep them coming
Home stretch guys
My exam is in 2 hours😳
Hello sir, what happened to your The BEST Way to ORGANIZE YOUR NOTES for the AP Exam 2020 (AP World, APUSH, AP Euro) video :(
Actually I took it down since my advice was specific to the 2020 exam... maybe I ought to make another for this year
@@heimlershistory ohh makes sense. YES PLEASEEE
Martinez Gary Harris Michelle Perez Edward
jimmy carter kinda fine
97 year old man
MERHABA 🙃
So... was Trump mirroring Reagan's policies in his term?
Oh very much so
@@heimlershistory Yeah my boy Trump!!! Great videos btw!!!!!
Kind of. Trump wasn't nearly as charismatic tho