Some food for thought: If QRP is a bad choice for beginners in the hobby, then why are Foundation licences in some countries (like Australia) limited to 10w? Spoiler alert: because if you focus your efforts on antennas, and understanding the basics of radio first, 10 watts will give you a lot of enjoyment and many, many contacts. It's a QRP rig, and that's fine with me. I appreciate your comments, and I DO agree with your comments, 100%. However I think the clickbait was unnecessary. "WHEN" in your title would have been a better choice than "WHY"... 73
Mind you, you'll not find an F call running 10w here :P That said, that is the idea. F call is to get you up to speed without causing any real harm to yourself or anyone else
@@shutthegate8232 Most beginning ham radio operators do not fare well with QRP on HF. HF QRP SSB is very difficult and a lot of skill is needed on HF QRP CW. I have tried it myself, with 35+ years on the air. Sure, you can make it work and the challenge is fun, but not what I'd recommend to a beginner. VHF/UHF operation often needs a lot of antenna and/or more power, unless you happen to be mountain-topping with the 705. This is not likely for a beginner. And beginners are not usually on the satellites. For VHF/UHF FM and DSTAR, yes the 705 would be a good rig, though an ID-51A handheld would do as well for about 1/3 of the price. If you just want to listen to HF, go to HTTP://websdr.org for free. I don't make the rules, but I've been around the block a few times and I'm active on the air this moment, in reality. I stand by my original post. 73 de Tim, WA5MD Dallas, TX
I recently bought an FT-891 for my portable/QRP needs. It cost $570 new on sale. It can run 5-10 watts when conditions allow & up to 100 watts when needed. I ran it on an 18 AH LiFePo4 battery in the back yard. I also have an IC-756 ProIII for my main base rig.
I totally agree with you. My first rig was an IC-7100. Yes, it doesn't have all the bells ans whistles of the 705, but it suits me fine as a base station, and it is also my portable rig. I am unable to backpack, but anywhere I can drive to and set up my radio, the 7100 works great.
I'm still looking for my first radio. I would like an all band. I'd like it for Home or Mobile I'm stuck between the IC-7100 vs the Yaesu FT991A Thoughts?
@@GaryWold the IC-7100 does all HF bands plus 2m and 440. It is an all round great radio. I am not familiar with the 991A. You may have to do some research. Also you might check the going prices on each.
I bought and paid for an IC705 for my new boat. So I can be Maritime Mobile on Lake Winnipeg. I have a KX3 but the batteries are a pain in the ass. I already have 2 IC7300's and an IC9700 and and IC7800 and more. It has it's purpose. It is a winner.
here is my take on the 705. I have my grandfathers hf rig, and i have an old boat anchor kenwood hf rig setting in a closet. I'm going for my general and the 705 being a modern radio that does everything (for the most part) is the golden ticket to setting up a minimal shack until such time as i can go through the big rigs and get them back on the air. a 7300 is the better base if you do not have a full pwr hf station. but if you do, or can get an older rig cheap then the 705 is spot on.
100 watt,,,,, yup. QRP rig limits you all the time. I work QRP when I can, but conditions need to be right,,,,,, which is not that often. I work QRP by turning my full power rigs down, not buying a dedicated low power unit.
If youu are in Australia and have the lowest level of license (Foundation), you are limited to - 10 Watts. You are also limited in the bands you may transmit on. So, you either buy something with extra power (and keep your ouput down) OR something with extra frequency range (and keep your hands off the TX key). I'd rather have the extra cover - and consider a PA if I want to boost the power later.
Excellent advice. Your first rig should be a rig that you can fairly easily make contacts with. You first rig should be in the 100 watt class. It doesn't need to be full of bells and whistles, but it does need to run enough power so people will hear you. Waterfall displays don't make it easier for people to hear you. QRP is a specialized mode that is fun, but can be extremely discouraging for a new ham. DO NOT start out with a QRP rig as your main rig. After you get a rig that runs at least 100 watts, and get some experience, then you may want to get, as a second rig, a QRP rig of some sort. And, before you take the plunge into an expensive 705 will bells and whistles, get a little experience with something that costs about $100. There are tons of choices from kits to full rigs. They aren't fancy, but they will give you experience . Low power is low power no matter how fancy your receiver is. You may find that QRP is just not your thing and you will end up saving a ton of money. Or, you may love it, in which case you can make a better decision about which rig is for you. I have a couple of QRP rigs, but if I had started out with them being my only main rig I would have moved on to a different hobby.
Waiting for the $ to drop slightly or pick up a mint pre-owned. Looks like a viable supplement to my FT818 hiking/SOTA rig. I see many disparaging the low 10w output. This rig is meant for highly portable in the field operation. You are not going far on foot with a 100w portable and the associated heavy battery required to power it. This radio is for those who do adventure radio (hiking, SOTA, POTA) you can do amazing things with the FT818 from a summit. The iCom 705 will expand this horizon. I am also into astronomy. A 6” budget reflector ($300)from a dark site will annihilate a several thousand $ professional grade scope from the bright city. In radio, high altitude/low RF is the dark sky!
Hmmm. Holding up a just released $1,000+ QRP rig and a thumbs down? Just a little deceptive. I would have been more impressed if you would have presented the IC 705 and a first look, or do session on why QRP isn’t the best choice for a new ham.
Good feedback. I do plan to do that once I get the radio in my hands. But as I said in the video, I was speaking directly to Hams who are new to the hobby, who are looking to buy this new radio, but don't understand what QRP is.
I also hold the opinion that the first radio must necessarily be 100W. The realization that you need a QRP radio should come by itself. For example, my first radio was FT-891 - a wonderful device, I can't say anything bad about it. But now I don't have a home shack, I work exclusively in the fields with a backpack. Considering that I work >90% of the time in CW, it made absolutely no sense for me to carry such a weight on myself. And I switched to QRP radio already knowing what it is, how to work with it, how to set up and use resonant antennas and being able to navigate the air. A beginner will only be disappointed that no one hears him. To put it quite simply - do not worry, novice friends, you will buy your IC-705, just a little later)
I'm guessing there are some people who have seen the video. For me I will have to wait a bit and while I'm curious what your POV is it's unlikely that I will be swayed. This rig will do everything an Elecraft KX2/KX3 will do (minus the tuner which is no issue for me) and works just like my 7300 (which is an absolutely awesome rig). I had a KX2 (and paid way more than the amount I'm paying for the 705) and it was a great little rig....but ultimately meh. I have a G90 and it's awesome...but that screen is SOOO small.
My Patrons get early access to all of my videos, yes. But lots of people are commenting on it now that I have scheduled it for tomorrow. I hope everyone watches, it might not be what you think
Totally agree. This is an incredible QRP rig. However, here is a caveat to this video. As a QRP rig by design, it’s incredibly efficient for "off grid" use. If your shack is designed as an off grid resource running on solar generation it makes sense as a base station with a PA-500 etc. (good luck getting one, 15 month wait)
Excellent analysis. So many people are going to buy this, be disappointed, and sell it. 90 days after this radio goes on the market you will find a bunch of these used for $800. Not because there is anything wrong with the radio, but because people who bought it to be cool will be upset they can’t talk to Tokyo with it.
Nice radio, but it's for a specific user, 5w on HF these days is a disaster, unless your on ft8 etc.. plus no tuner, one antenna socket, no 70mhz, no way would i use it for a home station. I'm happy with 7300 & 9700, 160 -23cms 🙂
But Icom has thought about the home station with the soon to be released IC-PW2 linear amp. You can plug this in on your desk for a shack in the box and then take it portable for 10w. I know I know... Ziegoop can do 20 watts or whatever. If you follow the math there isn't that much difference between 10 and 20 watts. I would much rather have Icom quality over a Chinese tin can with a tuner. But that's just me and that's what makes this fun. I haven't seen the video but I sure would urge anyone to do their homework and think before buying.... 2 things that are lacking in our society. Carry on.
@@twohandsandaradio Agreed on the amp. I am hoping to test one of those also. 10 or 20 watts doesn't matter either, you are correct. I don't care it is only 10 watts over 20 on the G90 or 15 on the KX3. The basic premise of the video is to do research
@@HamRadio2 it's what I've sad ad nauseum.... a factor that people don't consider is "fit". Does the radio fit. Sadly a lot of times we don't know until we own it. I would say there will be some serious "this isn't for me" fire sales. That's what I'm waiting for.
Licensed in 2014 as General. HOA and lack of a defined space for a dedicated ham shack led me to KX-3 and temporary wire antennas. Also thought I might do bike-to-site activations. Never did the bike activations, but never regretted the KX-3 decision. I've taken the KX-3 and a powerbank across the country on a plane, with wire antennas and SOTAbeams travel mast in my small checked bag. I'd never have bother with the equivalent of a 7300 and the associated power supply. If I get to use the KX-3, great, and if not, I didn't have to carry a lot of weight. Tough to make SSB contacts? Yes, at times, but I manage my expectations within the system capabilities.
I run I C 725 I also run Yeasu 101 Icom D Star 2 meter 440 .Kenwood I stay away from any thing digital except what is good for your needs. Analog I think is best. I don’t want to relay on any thing to do with satellite communication do what you think is best for you just remember if technology goes down what is best to stay stay in communication with .always plan on a back up it may be costly. And don’t forget to protect your equipment it’s called a fairday cauge 73’s to all.
Great video. I used to work 10kW HF TX stations in the early 90s and I'm only just getting into the HAM scene now. While I understand the theory and general consensus, I still have lots to learn regarding specific equipment, antennas and hardware. Your videos are very straightforward and informative. Thank you
Some important points here in this video regarding understanding one’s POU (philosophy of use) or USE CASE. Whichever term floats the boat is fine - but - it’s important to understand the features required for the task(s) at hand. As a newbie I see a few potential POU’s… 1) handheld QRP VHF/UHF for near field communications probably between family and friends 2) FULL POWER (is there a Qxx code for that? 🤔) HF/VHF/UHF mobile rig for in the car 3) QRP lightweight HF/VHF/UHF portable for POTA/SOTA/manpack/hiking etc. 4) FULL POWER HF/VHF/UHF for a base rig. Not sure yet if I need digital modes for all of these POU’s. Some overlap here too on POU’s so I will probably need to compromise to keep the cashflow under control and to not distress the Chief Executive Officer too much. 😂
If you live or for some reason life has forced you into an apartment the IC705 is the radio for you! Get a magloop antenna and your good to go yes it’s QRP but in an apartment complex you don’t want to do much more then 10watts so your not bleeding or interfering on other peoples electronics! I’ve made some good contacts on hf with this radio and the AL 705 antenna setting on a table next to the east facing window it works well and is a fun challenge to make contacts inside my apartment!
QRP as first HF or mobile rig will likely be frustrating unless you are already an experienced CW operator. It would be ok for local VHF/UHF repeaters, but too expensive just for that. I have worked Europe from US with CW on 20m with 1 watt. If that sounds like fun to you, the 705 may be right for you.
If you like QRP just for the sake of QRP and don't care about portability, you can still turn down the power on your shack rig and have the 100 watts if you want/need it.
Q RP is for people with experience, who have been an active ham for some time and already have a "real" radio. After that, if you really know what you are getting and want a low power ham station in a box, maybe you want it for an IF for you microwave transverter, or may be replace your old reliable FT817, you cant beat the IC705. It is a great, very specialized radio, but not a good first rig for a new ham.
Guess what, I just got an ICOM IC-705. It's the VHF/UHF/6m, built-in FT8, TX and RX pictures, DSTAR, GPS, clock with NTP time sync, and WLAN features that make it a very superior rig. Lots of hams purchase the IC-705 and very much ditch their HT's. I really love the type of battery it uses and the touch screen.
Exactly what I tried to explain to new hams when this was announced. 100 watts isn't really adequate on 75 or 160 these days. Between QRP radios and highly compromised HF antennas, this is a recipe for disappointment.
I am in the UK and just taking my Foundation level test, so I am just starting to look at what to buy for my first set up. This video has been very useful, thank you. You have shown me how important it is to check ALL the specifications before deciding. There is a lot of contradictory information around and I know that finally we each have to make our own decision, but I think the tone of this video feels right. Subscribed ! Pete on the England/Scotland border.
I would recommend a 7300 to anyone who wants a general purpose HF radio. The 7300 has 100W, built in antenna tuner, built in soundcard, and good user interface. For mobile, consider a used Icom 706IIG.
from KC1CCG - My radio is an IC-7300. Been a ham for over 60 years. A hundred watts is a fine level. Want to QRP ? Just turn a knob from 100% power out to 10% power out. Advice to new hams....the antenna is THE important part of the system. Understand antennas & grounds and whatever radio you have will be fine. Crappy antenna and 100W WILL be QRP because only 5 watts will go anywhere. The real test for me is....if I can hear them, I can work them (with few exceptions). They might be running 500W but our reports are the same or only 1 or 2 S units apart.
My very first HF rig was an FT-817nd....I don’t recommend it to people for their first HF rig, however I absolutely DO NOT regret it, for me personally....QRP forced me to learn antennas and proper setup. I still have the radio and I DO use it as a base station as well as going portable.....👍KF7CLH
I like my IC-705. Today I got into Croatia Euroope 20m from the UK, on a hill in my van using a £25 monoband hamstick on a magmount and 5w. 9-5, the staion was using 700w to get to me. The only critisism the station had was my modulation was overderiven, so I reduced my mike gain to 35% and TBW to mid. Don't buy an IC-705 unless you need a rig that pumps out 10w + it aint meant for that, if they wanted to they could make it do that, there are cheaper rigs to with more power to do mobile and home base. It uses a battery so you can go on the top of a hill like I did and QRPfor a long time, no bother. It is a very capable rig, it gets heard and the RX is great.
I've been hoping they would do some kind of IC-7000 Anniversary Edition that adds some of the 7300 features to a smaller, mobile radio like the 7000 was.
Get a 7300 first then either a 9700 or a 705 if you want a new digital icom radio. There are a lot of good radios available if you are not really concerned about a digital d-star or Fusion radio.
Jason -- I agree. As a main station a 10 watt radio isn't going to get the job done. 100 watts is 10 dB better. That's significant!! If you're a backpacker there are several choices for small, low power, portable radios. (Yaesu 818, Elecraft kx2 or 3 for example.)
Good advice, especially given the downside of QRP in a mobile set-up, where the antenna is almost always compromised in efficiency. 5 or 10 watts into a vertical mobile HF antenna will probably be only 2-3 watts relative ERP when compared to a full sized base station wire antenna at 5 or 10 watts. I own several QRP rigs and enjoy that type of operation for camping, backpacking, canoeing and Field Day. But for home and EMCOMM trailer use, I am far better off with 100 watts and the best antenna that I can get in the air.
I just upgraded from Technician to General. Been thinking about getting the 705 because it's an all band radio, does everything I need it to do and on top of that I'd like to get into QRP. I don't like having to run more power than I need. Don't have the space at the house for a dedicated HF rig or an inverted v. Already got the 5100A set up as my 2m/440 base station radio. Been getting on D-STAR and love the system. With the 705, I can pack it up and take it with me wherever I go. Camping, fishing, traveling out of state and not having to sit in my vehicle all the time just to do HF to show family and friends what my new favorite hobby is. Side note, I was on 023C in Australia about 2 weeks ago. Heard one station on the reflector using the 705. It sounded great on D-STAR. 73, KO4AHX.
Also been thinking about getting into PSK31. Going to do some more research, but from what I've read in the ARRL Radio Operators Manual, users run no more than 50 watts. I'm not looking to make overseas contacts on 5 or 10 watts, unless the band conditions are good. Just something to get into and experiment with. Definitely not a home base station radio for sure.
Most QRP hams are the reason why I don't jump into thinking getting a linear is a solution. I made friends with QRP hams, they spend more time on antennas and off-grid. I personally recommend QRP radios with built-in battery packs to start with. Nothing feels so much better than having a GRP HF all-mode setup successfully working well with battery and solar panel. I'm both into QRP and also 100W radio. Constantly, I'm experimenting with off-grid and low power equipment. One should really do is meditate on how to prepare for the worst blackout that lasts like a year. My ICOM IC-730 is my 100W rig that runs off 13.8VDC 20A, I have both Xiegu X6100 and G90.
@@DennyInDurham I'm not sure what this comment has to do with the video you are commenting on. But...... I've done what you're talking about in several other videos.
Yea Glad Some One Made This Video..I got A Budy i talk to on the radio That is fixing to buy his first good/new radio & he said some one told him the 705 But He is a New Ham & just Did not Know But We Got Him On The Right Path Now..Yaesu ft-991 or FTDX 10 Or The Icom IC-7300..He Has got them 3 on his short list..Just Trying to Find The Best Deal !
Bought my IC 705 about a year ago. Love it, I also have an IC 7300 too, both great rigs. Each has its use, I like going to the park with our local club for its weekly/ monthly QRP sessions. The 7300 is most definitely my base rig, might run QRP from my motor home next time we go somewhere. If you enjoy QRP the 705 is most definitely my choice, though there are variety of QRP rigs available. From Yaesu, Xiegu, there are even some tiny 5 watt QRP rigs for just a couple hundred bucks. I’ve been playing with QRP for 20 years off and on, so I knew what I was getting into with the 705. My last QRP rig was the Xiegu G90, nice rig, screen was just too small, reminded me of the FT 817ND rigs I’ve had. Great rigs made lots of contacts. Screen was just too small for my eyes. I do agree that a QRP rig for your first HF rig is not something you want to do…unless you know what you’re getting into. I had the Icom 703+ great rig, not very portable, but can be done. That said, if you are considering a new or a first HF rig get something with 100 watts you will be much happier. I have know folks who bought a QRP rig for their first rig, 6 months later it would be for sale. Too frustrating they say, only 5 watts they say. Well, don’t say I didn’t try and tell you. Love QRP, can’t wait to get out again to play radio!
Hey Jason, I completely agree with u (I always click on ur videos regardless of the title). I absolutely love my IC-7300 as my full power base station ... but also love to be HAM portable. I've been struggling with the decision to buy a new IC-705 QRP (+ portable antenna tuner, + portable amp, + etc.) ... or just take my IC-7300 portable (without any of those accessories because they're built-in). Plus I already own an IC-51A digital handheld so that is my very portable digital VHF/UHF radio. The ONLY advantage for me to buy a $1300 IC-705 is backpack portability as you said. But then I would also want to buy and pack an ATU, amp, etc if I want more antenna flexibility and full power (another $300+). For me, it was not worth it. I love the look and feel of the IC-705 for the QRP form factor. But I ultimately worked out a small backpack carrying my IC-7300, lithium battery and WRC vertical and can go anywhere with full power (or QRP). The IC-7300 is 9.3 lbs and the IC-705 is 2.4 lbs (only 6.9 lbs difference). Just my 2 cents on why I decided against the IC-705 for my portable purposes. 73 KJ6ER, Silicon Valley
Dude, I just ordered the Hardrock-50+ 100W linear amp kit for my ICOM IC-705. I'm also ordering the interface. Getting ready for winter Field Day. Something I really love about the IC-705 is Winlink.
I've got a few radios (shack, base, portable, qrp) and since I just ordered an IC705 I thought "well crap" when I saw the title. Now that I've listened and purchased my IC705 for (yet another) QRP / backpack rig for SOTA and POTA. I concur.
Potential buyers ... LMAO sir I won’t invest 1300 USD on this shit, I’d rather buy an iPhone. The same as those 5000 USD base station transceivers, no such thing as potential buyers if it is overpriced.
I agree as well. I have a Yaesu FT-817 and I love the thing. But it’s tough! I have not been able to make any voice contacts on it at home, but I have made a lot of great ones in the field. Another thing to note, is that lots of campgrounds have sites with power, and I have been able to bring my FT-450D and make some good contacts. I love QRP but I would fight new operators who try to get them as a first HF rig.
In the center of the screen, vertically, at the far right side, I see it, yes, I SEE IT!. Yes, a marvelous radio, a superb radio! Never been a better transceiver! Mine's the "B" model. I also recently acquired an FTV-650, and am currently collecting stuff to make a ground-plane.
I think the best policy if you want one is simply wait 2-3 months after it's been on sale and when some HAMs have had it a little while and realise they don't have enough power for what they do normally there will be one or two for for sale 2nd hand for cheap! If you can get one at the "right" price it's OK.
It's my first and only radio right now and it can go from desk to truck in 5 minutes. Really like the radio and if icom unlocked or added customizing some of the menus it would have been excellent rig.
Jason, your advice on this topic is spot on! A NEW HAM faces MANY challenges! If they spend a lot of cash and have a frustrating time making contacts (which QRP can do), they may hear folks but get frustrated when folks cannot hear them. I tell all new General HF operators to START with a 100 watt rig!
Yes, do both 100W and QRP rigs. Work on an off-grid portable system and make it work. I don't like the attitude of some people towards QRP. I recommend hams to have an off-grid functional off-grid QRP system while going about making 100W rigs work. Small portable solar phone chargers can charge HT's.
I live in a condo which ABSOLUTELY prohibits any kind of antenna on the outside of the building.. The IC-705 & a MAG loop seems an ideal HF solution for me
I use an Icom IC-7300 with MFJ Mag-loop. I get amazing results on digital modes; it doesn't compete that well with voice. The built-in "codec" makes it really easy to interface to a computer. No extra gadgets needed. Just a USB cable.
Thomas Maughan Thanks for the comment. I’m just considering what rig(s), antenna to choose. It’s sort of a toss-up between QRP with the IC-705 or the IC-7300. It’ll be a while before I decide. Meanwhile, I’m practicing CW again. It was my favorite mode in hf when I was last active.
@@georgemanning6217 The 705 looks like a terrific second radio but in your situation, a condo with antenna restrictions, the 7300 is much more likely to give you joy. Just dial the power down a bit and go with the mag-loop. Beware the power limits on mag-loops. If you exceed the power limit, or even come close to it depending on various factors, it will arc (spark) across the tuning capacitor and that could destroy the final amp MOSFETS. I use the MFJ portable mag loop (MFJ 936B Small High-Efficiency Loop Tuners) which requires a lot of manual adjustment when changing frequency but since it is close by it isn't much of a nuisance. It took an unusually long time to figure it out but now that I understand it, I tune it to 1:1 SWR on any band I've actually used it (10, 20, 40) quite easily and have never needed the internal tuner in the radio (the 705 doesn't have one, but the 7300 does). Mag-loops efficiency is largely by two factors: the area inside the loop; more is better, a LOT better! and the diameter of the radiating element makes a big difference. Going from 1/4 inch copper tubing to 1/2 inch copper tubing basically doubled my effective radiated power. What happens is you have a LOT of current circulating back and forth, 20 to 50 amps when tuned, the 1/4 inch tubing was actually getting warm! It produces a magnetic field which radiates same as the electric field (but orthogonal) which is to say, if the loop is vertical, the magnetic field is horizontal which means the electric field is vertical and that's your polarization. Also when the loop is vertical, you can NULL a source of electrical interference by pointing the axis of the donut directly at the source. For me it is an electrical substation. Oh yes, and 1/4 mile away is an AM broadcast station. But the loop antenna is extremely frequency selective and completely ignores the AM station. I can barely hear it when I dial its frequency. S4.
I’m about to buy an ID-52 or an IC-705. I live in a condo first floor of two stories, with a three story building next door, and a very strict HOA. I will be using the radio I choose from local high points nearby. I don’t own a car. First ham radio. Suggestions?
What is your purpose? What kind of operating do you want to do? The IC-705 has HF, so if you are just a Technician, you can't use HF yet (mostly) - so unless you are planning to upgrade to General soon, you won't need HF. Both radios have DSTAR and both do about 5w of output on vhf/uhf, but the ID-52 is FM only so you won't be able to do sideband. As a Technician, you have full privileges to vhf/uhf so you could operate sideband if you wish. Honestly they aren't the same radio, so you can't really compare them. So it depends on what your end goal is.
@@HamRadio2 Thank you for the info. I chose both the 705 (with mag loop as portable) and the ID-52a (as handheld on my back porch). With the 705/magloop I can speak with operators in Alaska and Canada easily.
I disagree with your analogy. My first rig Heathkit HW-9 is CW only and QRP. Maximum transmit 5 watts. I rarely transmitted higher than 3 watts. I was licensed in 1986. Old timers gave the same arguments as you for purchase of a new rig. I am glad though that you validate that those that don't understand what QRP is should not purchase the IC-705 and expect a more powerful radio. I work QRO when contesting but never use my radios. Best 72 de KB8AMZ
The difference is that when you were licensed, CW was required. And QRP is much easier with CW. This video is directed towards the very new Ham, who most likely doesn't know CW, and is planning to use the rig for SSB.
Just saw your video on the IC-705. My goal is for a backpack radio, powered by a LiFePO4 battery and solar panel. Antenna would be a buddistick. Joined an Icom 705 group and found it was an Icom love fest. I left the group. My thoughts are for the Xiego G 90. It is adjustable 0 to 20 watts. The 705 is 5 W internal battery, 10 W external battery. The Xiegu also has an antenna tuner. Also, it's 1/3 the price of the 705. Dennis, KD2MIP
OK in 2024 I have added a 705, 10 watts from the radio into a sailor marine amplifier 300 watts out. I am happy, if I want to go out I can take radio out too.
Very good advice! I second your thoughts.. The answer is use the correct tool for the job. I have a Ft-991a in my go box(trailer) I also have a FT-817 for backpacking. If there was a 100W version of the IC-705 in the works I'd buy it. I can't justify a IC-705 because I already have a qrp. I wouldthoughts. Have the built in sound card and sdr features on the IC-705. I love my IC-9700 for VHF/UHF. It a great radio. I've been a yaesu man for the last 20 years but I'm slowly becoming an Icom convert. The new Icom interfaces are much more user friendly than any of last generation radios of any maker...
I have also been a Yaesu man, but I feel that icom is making up lost ground. I already ordered my icom ic-7300 and I think it will not be the only one. Icom is easier to operate.
QRP aside, When you pass your first licence here in the UK you can't transmit higher power than 10W anyway. I do have the 7300 though (I just set the TX power to 10w).
I agree, still I like the portability and all the functionality for a physically small size radio. Plus, it has a removable battery. I got a Xiegu X6100 and I'm very happy with it, I'm thinking I may get an Icom IC-705 and I guarantee I will use it the most. I also plan to go to a HAM swap meet to find a large full size base station HF transceiver. In my neighborhood, I'm very content with an HT. The IC-705 makes me very comfortable to use with solar and external batteries, living off grid.
Not sure about others here, for us, the cost was a factor as well as the low RF output, This rig would have been great when the solar cycle was at its peak, but sadly that is not the situation now. We won't go outside DXing with less than 25 Watt available those days. Some are waiting to see how the IC-705 touch screen will fair under the sun's destructive rays. A few have reported ongoing problems with the IC-7610 screens ( strangely we never heard of this problem related to the IC-7300 nor our personal IC-9700) so not sure what this is all about or if it is relevant here at all ( we don't know much about the IC-705 screen, one would think they are different? ) but because it was raised we are giving it a mention.
Completely different screens. The 7610 is a 7" screen. 7300 and 9700 were 4.3" screens. Size doesn't have anything to do with it. They were just a completely different screen with quality issues that have been fixed (reportedly).
I own have owned and operated, for years and not just for a review, the Yeasu 817 and Icom 703+, 706, 7000, 7300, and 705. The 817, 703, and now the 705 were/are used extensively camping and backpacking. The 705, at 16 ounces, is simply years ahead of them technologically, as well it should be. The myriad of 705 digital modes and it's performance is phenomenal. I have done side by side comparisons in the field of the 817, 703, and 705 and the 705 is in a class of its own. Given a good antenna, an end fed with an Icom AH-4 while camping and resonant dipoles while backpacking, I have had the time of my life! At home, in a many side-by-side 705 and 7300 comparisons, the 7300 always wins. But, no surprises there. What may be of interest to others is comparing my Icom IC-7300 to my Collins 75S-3C. I felt for certain that the 7300 would walk all over the 75S-3C, but that wasn't the case as it was a tie, with the 3C audio (with a separate collins speaker) so, so much better. But, of course, the 7300 trounced the 3C when it came time to isolate weak signals adjacent to a powerful signal, owing to all the 7300's bells and whistles. In the final analysis I would not recommend a newbie ham getting any QRP rig, including the 705 as their first rig as they are likely to become frustrated not being able to work everyone. The 705 costs $1300 (without a tuner) and a 7300 (with a tuner) can be had for $1000. That's a no brainer for me, assuming you can afford it. And the 7300 can be taken camping, albeit with the right power supply (battery in my case). At any rate, I have been a ham for some 56 years, licensed in 3 different countries, and I am still enjoying the ride (took my VW Camper thru Europe and the Mideast in the 80's). And it's sure been a lot of fun watching the technology change and adapting to it..! Hmmm, if I can now just get a certain self proclaimed IC-705 reviewing genius who complained about the 705 having a plastic case instead of a metal one to understand that GPS signals do not penetrate metal or water... So don't go putting a GPS equipped rig in a metal bug out bag, hi, unless it has an external GPS antenna. 73's and best regards to all.
Always a great video.......Technically 5w is qrp not 10w. All HF radios are qrp because you can turn the power down to 5w. So why would anybody buy a QRP only radio. I dunno. An FT-891 is a small SDR radio for a reasonable price, or an FT-857, or an IC-706mkIIg which is a really versatile radio. Lots of better choices than a QRP only radio.
I have a Xiegu G90 and really like it. 20 watts qrp size and internal antenna tuner and decodes cw.and i bought it on sale for $450 dollars and not the $1,300.00 Icom is wanting for the 705 icom. I might have been interested in the 705 but personally I really like an internal antenna tuner and the 705 does NOT have one.
That is AWESOME! I've done the same thing with a LNR LD-11. The purpose of the video was to define what QRP is, but once someone understands that, QRP can be quite fun!
Great review. I have had my license since 1965. I think your advice about QRP is great for new hams. However, I think that people should not under estimate the power of 10 watts. I have had very good luck talking around the world with ten watts with the right antenna. js'g
My first radio was an Icom IC-718. 100 watts and half the price of the 705. My current rig that replaced the 718 is the KX3. I rarely operate more than 5 watts. If I can't get through I just move on. For me it isn't the power but the antenna. Good video. 73!!! de KE5ES
when people ask me what radio to but I just say 7300 as it is now industry standard TX audio and is a SDR...anything else does not justify the price tag. Oh and the 705 owners will always want more than the QRP power so the 7300 etc. are obvious choices. The 705 would be useful only as like Jason says a backpackers rig or SOTA.
I just watched just north of London, U.K. as one guy were using IC-705, it has great receiver, as other guy were coming in S 9, as other guy has pretty weak signal with no meter reading on IC-705 as of; in CB lingo is called: PEANUT-WHISTLE. In Ham term; is called; QRP that doesn't means: Quickly-Reduced-Power.
I was going to hold out for the IC-705, but ended up getting a Xiegu G90 earlier this year. Glad I did, great portable radio with an incredible built in ATU and a more usable 20w power. Now they have just added FM via a firmware update. Considering this cost 1/3rd of the price of the IC-705 it's exceptional value for money. Granted it doesn't have 2m but I have a Kenwood TR-751 for that.
5W output power is absolutely enough, at least in Europe. I make dozens of SOTA contacts with my 818 and no tuner but a resonant EFHW antenna. The 705 has to proven robust and throughly tested in the field, otherwise I'll stick with the lab599 transceiver.
I will stay with my G90 Xiegu with 20 watts, antenna tuner, antenna analyzer and it is built like a small tank. If I need more power, I will take my FT 891 installed in a manpack.
I said I wouldn't buy it but I just bought the 705, should have it by the weekend or early next week. I bought the 818 around 5 months ago lol, if the 705 is good I will sell the 818, I do like the 818, it's got really good audio and it's very rugged. Been having fun with a DL1DN whip and a MFJ-1820T whip, when conditions are good QRP works even with compromised antennas as long as the other station has a good antenna and they are loud with you they should hear you. Connected to my base antenna a 8010 49:1 does make a big difference. I'm also having fun QRP with a MFJ-935C loop tuner and their 9232 qrp tuner and 5 watts.
Jason, what are your recommendations for a backpack/battery HF that's not solely designed for QRP? I have big mtns here and I'd like to really reach out of possible....but I also have big legs so a few extra pounds of kit is ok. 20-50w maybe?? I feel like I want to be in a niche no one cares about right now.
I am not aware of ANY HF radio with a battery that isn't designed for QRP. You can't really have a radio with an internal battery that runs 100w (if I understand correctly what you are asking) - Several SOTA guys that I know are using a Bioenno battery with a Yaesu FT-891, which is small and light-weight, but not QRP.
Ham Radio 2.0 ok great! I'm sorry if my terminology was confusing. I'm quite new to this. The guidelines of QRP aren't of interest to me...but the smaller form factor/lightweight HFs are, although I understand performance comes at a price and I'm will to bear that as increased poundage on my back. I'm thinking more like a civilization is broke at the moment comms not 5watts max SOTA stuff....although I plan on participating. I don't want output power to be a hamstring and lead to frustrating operation....considering it might be used for emergency comms. The minimum power necessary yes but I want to have juice in reserve if propagation conditions aren't optimal. I hope this doesn't make me sound like a tin foil hat wearing loon....I just love the practical aspects of amateur radio a lot more than the artificially made challenges of contests or games. Thank you for replying and any further intel.
@@MrButterpantz It sounds like you might want a go-kit built with a full-power radio, battery, perhaps also a power-supply, some type of charge controller, maybe a solar panel connection, etc. Something like that would be portable for setting up emergency comms, but it isn't really able to be back-packed up a mountain.
Ham Radio 2.0 That actually sounds perfect Jason....plus you'd be suprised what I can ruck up a hill. I don't want to monopolize your time here since the 705 and your video doesn't seem to fit my intended purpose. Care to get me pointed in the correct direction?
I'm liking the 705 waterfall technology but not the 10 watt x ing power output. But the 705 can be modified for CB bands as well. The 7100 is a more versatile unit in its form factor. Divorced so the head is easily placed within handy reach without the bulky main radio unit. So what's the best solution? Wait for the 7100 to be upgraded with a colour waterfall screen? Or buy the 705 and a amplifier? They both will need a signal strength tuning meter as well . I know you did this video 2 years ago so maybe ICOM has an upgraded version of the 7100 in production. But only time will tell. Thanks for your videos. I'm in learn mode and I'm trying to absorb as much as I can. I have already brought a Kenwood nx5800 k2 and am looking to buy a nx5300 abp5 or abp6 intrenslicly safe MIL SPEC handheld for $1300.00 CDN .n/c the battery & charger. That's another $320.00 CDN.But if there's a way of getting a tri band mobile unit for both base and mobile, then that's what I feel is best overall.
I'm just waiting for my IC 705 to ship. This will be my backpacking rig. I dont use HF that much, more VHF/UHF. Can't wait to try this out. This will be my first HF back packing radio. Any suggestions on what I can use to keep the battery charged while in the field? Keep in mind I have about 50lbs of food, clothes, tent..and misc.
I have a 9 watt flexible solar panel with charge controller for an Elecraft KX2. Some of the newer battery chemistries are light weight but difficult to charge with solar. What I did was find some plastic 8-cell packs to hold NiMH batteries in AA and D sizes and wired them up with the appropriate connectors. Just make sure your IC 705 rig can run on 10.4 volts or less if you go this route.
Why not get a 100 watt rig and if you want to do QRP, turn the RF power down? I agree with Jason. Seems like a smarter thing to have the 100 watts if you need it.
HamRadio 2.0 - I think you, Jason underestimate the Potential market for this QRP Rig. people who like , Overlanding, Hiking , Trails Climbing and even Backyard Camping , and just using the Radio Outdoors will Enjoy using it. moving a Full Power Rig outdoors in Weather , it not going to work. you will have to run Extinsinon Cables and even a Generator. you can run IC-705 on Batteries and its Weatherproof and its so light to move inside to outside. its like having a HT Rig thats not a HT .
I call this ICOM IC-705 a super HT! A large HT above all other HT's. It’s basically 2 kinds of radios in 1, a QRP HF and a VHF/UHF/6m with DSTAR. Amongst all the DSTAR HT's, this ICOM IC-705 very much outranks them.
I’m thinking of the IC 705 with a tuner with the qrpguys DS1 antenna kit for my sailboat - emphasizing cw- and to portably bring back home for backyard use same way, and bringing on vacations same way- make sense?
If you know what QRP is and want an IC-705 as a base station, I say go for it. Personally, I prefer Yaesu b/c the radios generally accept a wider range of voltages to power the unit. I use an FT-817N/D and an X5105 as base stations when I need a base station. Just understand what is meant by QRP and decide if that is what you want.
Great info for new hams! I run a IC7300 and an AL 811H as a base unit and about half way thru the video I'm thinking, mention the IC 7100 which I run mobile and I think is the perfect set-up.
It seems so simple that these are tools for can be a really fancy hammer but if you're looking at a screw it just isn't the proper thing to get. Nice video clear and concise
Great Video. And you are on point about QRP as a base. Heck, I have done QRP in Central Park and have never made a contact. I raise the power to 100 watts and wouldn't you know, I made some contacts! Oh, less commercials please. A commercial every 3 minutes is annoying and disrupts the flow of the video.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and insights. I currently have a G90 , FT 857D and TS2000. Only the G90 has a water fall, which I like but Ham Radio Deluxe does too. I could sell my TS2000 and buy a refurbished 705 or 7300. I never really used the full 100 watts on the Kenwood. Before POTA I enjoyed activating counties as I drove places. I’m now planning to become active in POTA/SOTA. When I was first licensed I was most interested in AMSAT. However after more than 30 years being a HAM interests have changed. Now I am more focused on effective Antennas than the Radio. 73 Steve AA4SH
As usual, the answer is: It depends on your needs.
Yep
There is a big clue on the advertising leaflet for the IC-705 to help guide prospective buyers what the radio was designed for.....
Some food for thought: If QRP is a bad choice for beginners in the hobby, then why are Foundation licences in some countries (like Australia) limited to 10w?
Spoiler alert: because if you focus your efforts on antennas, and understanding the basics of radio first, 10 watts will give you a lot of enjoyment and many, many contacts.
It's a QRP rig, and that's fine with me. I appreciate your comments, and I DO agree with your comments, 100%. However I think the clickbait was unnecessary. "WHEN" in your title would have been a better choice than "WHY"...
73
That makes sense, yes. The video was mostly directed towards U.S. Hams, but I can understand your viewpoint.
Mind you, you'll not find an F call running 10w here :P
That said, that is the idea. F call is to get you up to speed without causing any real harm to yourself or anyone else
Because the people who make those rules are not active amateurs who understand the realities of operating a station under current HF conditions.
@@bct5ak Sounds like that could be applied to the people making the rules in most situations :-) so far removed, they've lost touch with reality
@@shutthegate8232 Most beginning ham radio operators do not fare well with QRP on HF. HF QRP SSB is very difficult and a lot of skill is needed on HF QRP CW. I have tried it myself, with 35+ years on the air. Sure, you can make it work and the challenge is fun, but not what I'd recommend to a beginner.
VHF/UHF operation often needs a lot of antenna and/or more power, unless you happen to be mountain-topping with the 705. This is not likely for a beginner. And beginners are not usually on the satellites. For VHF/UHF FM and DSTAR, yes the 705 would be a good rig, though an ID-51A handheld would do as well for about 1/3 of the price. If you just want to listen to HF, go to HTTP://websdr.org for free.
I don't make the rules, but I've been around the block a few times and I'm active on the air this moment, in reality.
I stand by my original post.
73 de Tim, WA5MD
Dallas, TX
I recently bought an FT-891 for my portable/QRP needs. It cost $570 new on sale. It can run 5-10 watts when conditions allow & up to 100 watts when needed. I ran it on an 18 AH LiFePo4 battery in the back yard. I also have an IC-756 ProIII for my main base rig.
I agree, Bill. I am about to install a FT-891 in my Truck and possibly for POTA. All the best, 73 de KI5HXM
I totally agree with you. My first rig was an IC-7100. Yes, it doesn't have all the bells ans whistles of the 705, but it suits me fine as a base station, and it is also my portable rig. I am unable to backpack, but anywhere I can drive to and set up my radio, the 7100 works great.
Thanks for sharing!
I'm still looking for my first radio. I would like an all band. I'd like it for Home or Mobile I'm stuck between the IC-7100 vs the Yaesu FT991A Thoughts?
@@GaryWold the IC-7100 does all HF bands plus 2m and 440. It is an all round great radio. I am not familiar with the 991A. You may have to do some research. Also you might check the going prices on each.
Ditto. 7100 was my 2nd radio...awesome rig...home, mobile, field...great rig.
I bought and paid for an IC705 for my new boat. So I can be Maritime Mobile on Lake Winnipeg. I have a KX3 but the batteries are a pain in the ass. I already have 2 IC7300's and an IC9700 and and IC7800 and more. It has it's purpose. It is a winner.
Thanks for commenting
here is my take on the 705. I have my grandfathers hf rig, and i have an old boat anchor kenwood hf rig setting in a closet. I'm going for my general and the 705 being a modern radio that does everything (for the most part) is the golden ticket to setting up a minimal shack until such time as i can go through the big rigs and get them back on the air. a 7300 is the better base if you do not have a full pwr hf station. but if you do, or can get an older rig cheap then the 705 is spot on.
100 watt,,,,, yup. QRP rig limits you all the time. I work QRP when I can, but conditions need to be right,,,,,, which is not that often. I work QRP by turning my full power rigs down, not buying a dedicated low power unit.
If youu are in Australia and have the lowest level of license (Foundation), you are limited to - 10 Watts. You are also limited in the bands you may transmit on.
So, you either buy something with extra power (and keep your ouput down) OR something with extra frequency range (and keep your hands off the TX key).
I'd rather have the extra cover - and consider a PA if I want to boost the power later.
Excellent advice. Your first rig should be a rig that you can fairly easily make contacts with. You first rig should be in the 100 watt class. It doesn't need to be full of bells and whistles, but it does need to run enough power so people will hear you. Waterfall displays don't make it easier for people to hear you. QRP is a specialized mode that is fun, but can be extremely discouraging for a new ham. DO NOT start out with a QRP rig as your main rig. After you get a rig that runs at least 100 watts, and get some experience, then you may want to get, as a second rig, a QRP rig of some sort. And, before you take the plunge into an expensive 705 will bells and whistles, get a little experience with something that costs about $100. There are tons of choices from kits to full rigs. They aren't fancy, but they will give you experience . Low power is low power no matter how fancy your receiver is. You may find that QRP is just not your thing and you will end up saving a ton of money. Or, you may love it, in which case you can make a better decision about which rig is for you. I have a couple of QRP rigs, but if I had started out with them being my only main rig I would have moved on to a different hobby.
This sounds very logical to me.
Waiting for the $ to drop slightly or pick up a mint pre-owned. Looks like a viable supplement to my FT818 hiking/SOTA rig. I see many disparaging the low 10w output. This rig is meant for highly portable in the field operation. You are not going far on foot with a 100w portable and the associated heavy battery required to power it. This radio is for those who do adventure radio (hiking, SOTA, POTA) you can do amazing things with the FT818 from a summit. The iCom 705 will expand this horizon.
I am also into astronomy. A 6” budget reflector ($300)from a dark site will annihilate a several thousand $ professional grade scope from the bright city.
In radio, high altitude/low RF is the dark sky!
Hmmm. Holding up a just released $1,000+ QRP rig and a thumbs down? Just a little deceptive.
I would have been more impressed if you would have presented the IC 705 and a first look, or do session on why QRP isn’t the best choice for a new ham.
Good feedback. I do plan to do that once I get the radio in my hands. But as I said in the video, I was speaking directly to Hams who are new to the hobby, who are looking to buy this new radio, but don't understand what QRP is.
Still clickbait. You could set the title to “When not to buy” instead of why. But video is fine.
I also hold the opinion that the first radio must necessarily be 100W. The realization that you need a QRP radio should come by itself. For example, my first radio was FT-891 - a wonderful device, I can't say anything bad about it. But now I don't have a home shack, I work exclusively in the fields with a backpack. Considering that I work >90% of the time in CW, it made absolutely no sense for me to carry such a weight on myself. And I switched to QRP radio already knowing what it is, how to work with it, how to set up and use resonant antennas and being able to navigate the air. A beginner will only be disappointed that no one hears him. To put it quite simply - do not worry, novice friends, you will buy your IC-705, just a little later)
I'm guessing there are some people who have seen the video. For me I will have to wait a bit and while I'm curious what your POV is it's unlikely that I will be swayed. This rig will do everything an Elecraft KX2/KX3 will do (minus the tuner which is no issue for me) and works just like my 7300 (which is an absolutely awesome rig). I had a KX2 (and paid way more than the amount I'm paying for the 705) and it was a great little rig....but ultimately meh. I have a G90 and it's awesome...but that screen is SOOO small.
My Patrons get early access to all of my videos, yes. But lots of people are commenting on it now that I have scheduled it for tomorrow. I hope everyone watches, it might not be what you think
Totally agree. This is an incredible QRP rig. However, here is a caveat to this video. As a QRP rig by design, it’s incredibly efficient for "off grid" use. If your shack is designed as an off grid resource running on solar generation it makes sense as a base station with a PA-500 etc. (good luck getting one, 15 month wait)
Excellent analysis. So many people are going to buy this, be disappointed, and sell it. 90 days after this radio goes on the market you will find a bunch of these used for $800. Not because there is anything wrong with the radio, but because people who bought it to be cool will be upset they can’t talk to Tokyo with it.
Sales listed as "it's just not my thing". LOL THAT'S what I'm waiting for!!
Nice radio, but it's for a specific user, 5w on HF these days is a disaster, unless your on ft8 etc..
plus no tuner, one antenna socket, no 70mhz, no way would i use it for a home station.
I'm happy with 7300 & 9700, 160 -23cms 🙂
We don't have access to 70MHz here, but I was somewhat surprised they didn't have a European version that included that band.
But Icom has thought about the home station with the soon to be released IC-PW2 linear amp. You can plug this in on your desk for a shack in the box and then take it portable for 10w. I know I know... Ziegoop can do 20 watts or whatever. If you follow the math there isn't that much difference between 10 and 20 watts. I would much rather have Icom quality over a Chinese tin can with a tuner. But that's just me and that's what makes this fun. I haven't seen the video but I sure would urge anyone to do their homework and think before buying.... 2 things that are lacking in our society. Carry on.
@@twohandsandaradio Agreed on the amp. I am hoping to test one of those also.
10 or 20 watts doesn't matter either, you are correct. I don't care it is only 10 watts over 20 on the G90 or 15 on the KX3.
The basic premise of the video is to do research
@@HamRadio2 it's what I've sad ad nauseum.... a factor that people don't consider is "fit". Does the radio fit. Sadly a lot of times we don't know until we own it. I would say there will be some serious "this isn't for me" fire sales. That's what I'm waiting for.
"5w on HF these days is a disaster" I spent last weekend talking to the east coast on 40m @5w from Ca.
Licensed in 2014 as General. HOA and lack of a defined space for a dedicated ham shack led me to KX-3 and temporary wire antennas. Also thought I might do bike-to-site activations. Never did the bike activations, but never regretted the KX-3 decision. I've taken the KX-3 and a powerbank across the country on a plane, with wire antennas and SOTAbeams travel mast in my small checked bag. I'd never have bother with the equivalent of a 7300 and the associated power supply. If I get to use the KX-3, great, and if not, I didn't have to carry a lot of weight. Tough to make SSB contacts? Yes, at times, but I manage my expectations within the system capabilities.
I run I C 725 I also run Yeasu 101 Icom D Star 2 meter 440 .Kenwood I stay away from any thing digital except what is good for your needs. Analog I think is best. I don’t want to relay on any thing to do with satellite communication do what you think is best for you just remember if technology goes down what is best to stay stay in communication with .always plan on a back up it may be costly. And don’t forget to protect your equipment it’s called a fairday cauge 73’s to all.
Great video. I used to work 10kW HF TX stations in the early 90s and I'm only just getting into the HAM scene now. While I understand the theory and general consensus, I still have lots to learn regarding specific equipment, antennas and hardware.
Your videos are very straightforward and informative. Thank you
Some important points here in this video regarding understanding one’s POU (philosophy of use) or USE CASE. Whichever term floats the boat is fine - but - it’s important to understand the features required for the task(s) at hand. As a newbie I see a few potential POU’s… 1) handheld QRP VHF/UHF for near field communications probably between family and friends 2) FULL POWER (is there a Qxx code for that? 🤔) HF/VHF/UHF mobile rig for in the car 3) QRP lightweight HF/VHF/UHF portable for POTA/SOTA/manpack/hiking etc. 4) FULL POWER HF/VHF/UHF for a base rig. Not sure yet if I need digital modes for all of these POU’s. Some overlap here too on POU’s so I will probably need to compromise to keep the cashflow under control and to not distress the Chief Executive Officer too much. 😂
If you live or for some reason life has forced you into an apartment the IC705 is the radio for you! Get a magloop antenna and your good to go yes it’s QRP but in an apartment complex you don’t want to do much more then 10watts so your not bleeding or interfering on other peoples electronics! I’ve made some good contacts on hf with this radio and the AL 705 antenna setting on a table next to the east facing window it works well and is a fun challenge to make contacts inside my apartment!
QRP as first HF or mobile rig will likely be frustrating unless you are already an experienced CW operator. It would be ok for local VHF/UHF repeaters, but too expensive just for that.
I have worked Europe from US with CW on 20m with 1 watt. If that sounds like fun to you, the 705 may be right for you.
Agreed
If you like QRP just for the sake of QRP and don't care about portability, you can still turn down the power on your shack rig and have the 100 watts if you want/need it.
True
Q RP is for people with experience, who have been an active ham for some time and already have a "real" radio. After that, if you really know what you are getting and want a low power ham station in a box, maybe you want it for an IF for you microwave transverter, or may be replace your old reliable FT817, you cant beat the IC705. It is a great, very specialized radio, but not a good first rig for a new ham.
Guess what, I just got an ICOM IC-705. It's the VHF/UHF/6m, built-in FT8, TX and RX pictures, DSTAR, GPS, clock with NTP time sync, and WLAN features that make it a very superior rig. Lots of hams purchase the IC-705 and very much ditch their HT's. I really love the type of battery it uses and the touch screen.
Exactly what I tried to explain to new hams when this was announced. 100 watts isn't really adequate on 75 or 160 these days. Between QRP radios and highly compromised HF antennas, this is a recipe for disappointment.
The ICOM IC-705 comes with a detachable battery. I recommend QRP radios for new hams to experiment with off-grid broadcasting.
I am in the UK and just taking my Foundation level test, so I am just starting to look at what to buy for my first set up. This video has been very useful, thank you. You have shown me how important it is to check ALL the specifications before deciding. There is a lot of contradictory information around and I know that finally we each have to make our own decision, but I think the tone of this video feels right. Subscribed ! Pete on the England/Scotland border.
I would recommend a 7300 to anyone who wants a general purpose HF radio. The 7300 has 100W, built in antenna tuner, built in soundcard, and good user interface. For mobile, consider a used Icom 706IIG.
Yes
from KC1CCG - My radio is an IC-7300. Been a ham for over 60 years. A hundred watts is a fine level. Want to QRP ? Just turn a knob from 100% power out to 10% power out. Advice to new hams....the antenna is THE important part of the system. Understand antennas & grounds and whatever radio you have will be fine. Crappy antenna and 100W WILL be QRP because only 5 watts will go anywhere. The real test for me is....if I can hear them, I can work them (with few exceptions). They might be running 500W but our reports are the same or only 1 or 2 S units apart.
My very first HF rig was an FT-817nd....I don’t recommend it to people for their first HF rig, however I absolutely DO NOT regret it, for me personally....QRP forced me to learn antennas and proper setup. I still have the radio and I DO use it as a base station as well as going portable.....👍KF7CLH
I like my IC-705. Today I got into Croatia Euroope 20m from the UK, on a hill in my van using a £25 monoband hamstick on a magmount and 5w. 9-5, the staion was using 700w to get to me. The only critisism the station had was my modulation was overderiven, so I reduced my mike gain to 35% and TBW to mid.
Don't buy an IC-705 unless you need a rig that pumps out 10w + it aint meant for that, if they wanted to they could make it do that, there are cheaper rigs to with more power to do mobile and home base.
It uses a battery so you can go on the top of a hill like I did and QRPfor a long time, no bother. It is a very capable rig, it gets heard and the RX is great.
Yes indeed, I am really liking my IC-705
maybe it's time for a 7100 revamp. 7100 with a 7300 screen/features. I'll buy 1
I've been hoping they would do some kind of IC-7000 Anniversary Edition that adds some of the 7300 features to a smaller, mobile radio like the 7000 was.
@@HamRadio2 Now that would be nice!
@@geod3589 YES YES YES YES
Get a 7300 first then either a 9700 or a 705 if you want a new digital icom radio. There are a lot of good radios available if you are not really concerned about a digital d-star or Fusion radio.
Jason -- I agree. As a main station a 10 watt radio isn't going to get the job done. 100 watts is 10 dB better. That's significant!! If you're a backpacker there are several choices for small, low power, portable radios. (Yaesu 818, Elecraft kx2 or 3 for example.)
Agreed, Bill. Thanks for commenting.
Good advice, especially given the downside of QRP in a mobile set-up, where the antenna is almost always compromised in efficiency. 5 or 10 watts into a vertical mobile HF antenna will probably be only 2-3 watts relative ERP when compared to a full sized base station wire antenna at 5 or 10 watts. I own several QRP rigs and enjoy that type of operation for camping, backpacking, canoeing and Field Day. But for home and EMCOMM trailer use, I am far better off with 100 watts and the best antenna that I can get in the air.
I just upgraded from Technician to General. Been thinking about getting the 705 because it's an all band radio, does everything I need it to do and on top of that I'd like to get into QRP. I don't like having to run more power than I need. Don't have the space at the house for a dedicated HF rig or an inverted v.
Already got the 5100A set up as my 2m/440 base station radio. Been getting on D-STAR and love the system. With the 705, I can pack it up and take it with me wherever I go. Camping, fishing, traveling out of state and not having to sit in my vehicle all the time just to do HF to show family and friends what my new favorite hobby is.
Side note, I was on 023C in Australia about 2 weeks ago. Heard one station on the reflector using the 705. It sounded great on D-STAR.
73, KO4AHX.
The 705 would be great for you, I think
Also been thinking about getting into PSK31. Going to do some more research, but from what I've read in the ARRL Radio Operators Manual, users run no more than 50 watts. I'm not looking to make overseas contacts on 5 or 10 watts, unless the band conditions are good. Just something to get into and experiment with. Definitely not a home base station radio for sure.
Most QRP hams are the reason why I don't jump into thinking getting a linear is a solution. I made friends with QRP hams, they spend more time on antennas and off-grid. I personally recommend QRP radios with built-in battery packs to start with. Nothing feels so much better than having a GRP HF all-mode setup successfully working well with battery and solar panel. I'm both into QRP and also 100W radio. Constantly, I'm experimenting with off-grid and low power equipment. One should really do is meditate on how to prepare for the worst blackout that lasts like a year. My ICOM IC-730 is my 100W rig that runs off 13.8VDC 20A, I have both Xiegu X6100 and G90.
Also, nearly all 100w rigs have a power output setting and you can turn them down to 5w or less
@@DennyInDurham I'm not sure what this comment has to do with the video you are commenting on. But...... I've done what you're talking about in several other videos.
Yea Glad Some One Made This Video..I got A Budy i talk to on the radio That is fixing to buy his first good/new radio & he said some one told him the 705 But He is a New Ham & just Did not Know But We Got Him On The Right Path Now..Yaesu ft-991 or FTDX 10 Or The Icom IC-7300..He Has got them 3 on his short list..Just Trying to Find The Best Deal !
Agreed. IC 7100 is, imho, by far the best bang for your buck for a mobile rig. 705, SOTA guys will love it!
Bought my IC 705 about a year ago. Love it, I also have an IC 7300 too, both great rigs. Each has its use, I like going to the park with our local club for its weekly/ monthly QRP sessions. The 7300 is most definitely my base rig, might run QRP from my motor home next time we go somewhere.
If you enjoy QRP the 705 is most definitely my choice, though there are variety of QRP rigs available. From Yaesu, Xiegu, there are even some tiny 5 watt QRP rigs for just a couple hundred bucks. I’ve been playing with QRP for 20 years off and on, so I knew what I was getting into with the 705. My last QRP rig was the Xiegu G90, nice rig, screen was just too small, reminded me of the FT 817ND rigs I’ve had. Great rigs made lots of contacts. Screen was just too small for my eyes.
I do agree that a QRP rig for your first HF rig is not something you want to do…unless you know what you’re getting into. I had the Icom 703+ great rig, not very portable, but can be done. That said, if you are considering a new or a first HF rig get something with 100 watts you will be much happier. I have know folks who bought a QRP rig for their first rig, 6 months later it would be for sale. Too frustrating they say, only 5 watts they say. Well, don’t say I didn’t try and tell you. Love QRP, can’t wait to get out again to play radio!
Hey Jason, I completely agree with u (I always click on ur videos regardless of the title). I absolutely love my IC-7300 as my full power base station ... but also love to be HAM portable. I've been struggling with the decision to buy a new IC-705 QRP (+ portable antenna tuner, + portable amp, + etc.) ... or just take my IC-7300 portable (without any of those accessories because they're built-in). Plus I already own an IC-51A digital handheld so that is my very portable digital VHF/UHF radio. The ONLY advantage for me to buy a $1300 IC-705 is backpack portability as you said. But then I would also want to buy and pack an ATU, amp, etc if I want more antenna flexibility and full power (another $300+). For me, it was not worth it. I love the look and feel of the IC-705 for the QRP form factor. But I ultimately worked out a small backpack carrying my IC-7300, lithium battery and WRC vertical and can go anywhere with full power (or QRP). The IC-7300 is 9.3 lbs and the IC-705 is 2.4 lbs (only 6.9 lbs difference). Just my 2 cents on why I decided against the IC-705 for my portable purposes. 73 KJ6ER, Silicon Valley
Thanks for commenting
If you can resist being an early adopter and the new shiny toy, wait a year and watch how many IC-705's are put up for sale on QRZ. Snag one then.
Agreed. The retail price will also drop, as always happens with new rigs
@@elevenbravoonepapa look at the 7300, 9700 and 5100.
Dude, I just ordered the Hardrock-50+ 100W linear amp kit for my ICOM IC-705. I'm also ordering the interface. Getting ready for winter Field Day. Something I really love about the IC-705 is Winlink.
I'm not familiar with that amp, I'll look it up
I've got a few radios (shack, base, portable, qrp) and since I just ordered an IC705 I thought "well crap" when I saw the title. Now that I've listened and purchased my IC705 for (yet another) QRP / backpack rig for SOTA and POTA. I concur.
Yes sir, great to hear! I am still loving my IC-705
Click-bait! So what your saying is: "If you want a 100 Watt transceiver don't buy the IC-705." I think you underestimate potential buyers.
As stated in the video, this comes from many NEW hams I've spoken to
First time on the internets huh
Potential buyers ... LMAO sir I won’t invest 1300 USD on this shit, I’d rather buy an iPhone. The same as those 5000 USD base station transceivers, no such thing as potential buyers if it is overpriced.
The stuff we actually care about starts at 2:57. The stuff before it is a time-waster.
Time waster, like this comment
@@HamRadio2 Dunno man. Here I am year later, thankful I made this comment.
@@Matt-pd2cq apparently you still have an abundance of time
@@HamRadio2 oh yeah the fact that it took me a year to come back really says that, doesn't it :-P
I got my IC7300 as my second HF rig. G90 was my first then sold it. I now really would like a IC705.
I agree as well. I have a Yaesu FT-817 and I love the thing. But it’s tough! I have not been able to make any voice contacts on it at home, but I have made a lot of great ones in the field. Another thing to note, is that lots of campgrounds have sites with power, and I have been able to bring my FT-450D and make some good contacts. I love QRP but I would fight new operators who try to get them as a first HF rig.
In the center of the screen, vertically, at the far right side, I see it, yes, I SEE IT!. Yes, a marvelous radio, a superb radio! Never been a better transceiver! Mine's the "B" model. I also recently acquired an FTV-650, and am currently collecting stuff to make a ground-plane.
I think the best policy if you want one is simply wait 2-3 months after it's been on sale and when some HAMs have had it a little while and realise they don't have enough power for what they do normally there will be one or two for for sale 2nd hand for cheap! If you can get one at the "right" price it's OK.
Yes I am sure some folks will wait
You make a good point. The 7100 deserves a second look !
It's my first and only radio right now and it can go from desk to truck in 5 minutes. Really like the radio and if icom unlocked or added customizing some of the menus it would have been excellent rig.
Jason, your advice on this topic is spot on! A NEW HAM faces MANY challenges! If they spend a lot of cash and have a frustrating time making contacts (which QRP can do), they may hear folks but get frustrated when folks cannot hear them. I tell all new General HF operators to START with a 100 watt rig!
Thanks Ernest
Yes, do both 100W and QRP rigs. Work on an off-grid portable system and make it work. I don't like the attitude of some people towards QRP. I recommend hams to have an off-grid functional off-grid QRP system while going about making 100W rigs work. Small portable solar phone chargers can charge HT's.
I'm new at this. I didn't understand the difference, and now I do. Thanks. I definitely get 10W vs 100W for a base station. I'm working on my license.
I live in a condo which ABSOLUTELY prohibits any kind of antenna on the outside of the building..
The IC-705 & a MAG loop seems an ideal HF solution for me
That sounds like a good plan
A Xiegu G90 will give you 20w and now with FM (firm V 1.75) is a very user friendly rig.
I use an Icom IC-7300 with MFJ Mag-loop. I get amazing results on digital modes; it doesn't compete that well with voice. The built-in "codec" makes it really easy to interface to a computer. No extra gadgets needed. Just a USB cable.
Thomas Maughan
Thanks for the comment. I’m just considering what rig(s), antenna to choose. It’s sort of a toss-up between QRP with the IC-705 or the IC-7300.
It’ll be a while before I decide. Meanwhile, I’m practicing CW again. It was my favorite mode in hf when I was last active.
@@georgemanning6217 The 705 looks like a terrific second radio but in your situation, a condo with antenna restrictions, the 7300 is much more likely to give you joy. Just dial the power down a bit and go with the mag-loop.
Beware the power limits on mag-loops. If you exceed the power limit, or even come close to it depending on various factors, it will arc (spark) across the tuning capacitor and that could destroy the final amp MOSFETS. I use the MFJ portable mag loop (MFJ 936B Small High-Efficiency Loop Tuners) which requires a lot of manual adjustment when changing frequency but since it is close by it isn't much of a nuisance. It took an unusually long time to figure it out but now that I understand it, I tune it to 1:1 SWR on any band I've actually used it (10, 20, 40) quite easily and have never needed the internal tuner in the radio (the 705 doesn't have one, but the 7300 does).
Mag-loops efficiency is largely by two factors: the area inside the loop; more is better, a LOT better! and the diameter of the radiating element makes a big difference. Going from 1/4 inch copper tubing to 1/2 inch copper tubing basically doubled my effective radiated power. What happens is you have a LOT of current circulating back and forth, 20 to 50 amps when tuned, the 1/4 inch tubing was actually getting warm! It produces a magnetic field which radiates same as the electric field (but orthogonal) which is to say, if the loop is vertical, the magnetic field is horizontal which means the electric field is vertical and that's your polarization.
Also when the loop is vertical, you can NULL a source of electrical interference by pointing the axis of the donut directly at the source. For me it is an electrical substation.
Oh yes, and 1/4 mile away is an AM broadcast station. But the loop antenna is extremely frequency selective and completely ignores the AM station. I can barely hear it when I dial its frequency. S4.
I’m about to buy an ID-52 or an IC-705.
I live in a condo first floor of two stories, with a three story building next door, and a very strict HOA. I will be using the radio I choose from local high points nearby. I don’t own a car. First ham radio.
Suggestions?
What is your purpose? What kind of operating do you want to do?
The IC-705 has HF, so if you are just a Technician, you can't use HF yet (mostly) - so unless you are planning to upgrade to General soon, you won't need HF.
Both radios have DSTAR and both do about 5w of output on vhf/uhf, but the ID-52 is FM only so you won't be able to do sideband. As a Technician, you have full privileges to vhf/uhf so you could operate sideband if you wish.
Honestly they aren't the same radio, so you can't really compare them. So it depends on what your end goal is.
@@HamRadio2 Thank you for the info.
I chose both the 705 (with mag loop as portable) and the ID-52a (as handheld on my back porch).
With the 705/magloop I can speak with operators in Alaska and Canada easily.
Oops! I live in Phoenix.
I disagree with your analogy. My first rig Heathkit HW-9 is CW only and QRP. Maximum transmit 5 watts. I rarely transmitted higher than 3 watts. I was licensed in 1986. Old timers gave the same arguments as you for purchase of a new rig. I am glad though that you validate that those that don't understand what QRP is should not purchase the IC-705 and expect a more powerful radio. I work QRO when contesting but never use my radios. Best 72 de KB8AMZ
The difference is that when you were licensed, CW was required. And QRP is much easier with CW. This video is directed towards the very new Ham, who most likely doesn't know CW, and is planning to use the rig for SSB.
@@HamRadio2 Yes, I agree and see your point. Enjoy your show. 72 de KB8AMZ HF CW QRP OP.
@@MoTown44240 Thanks for the feedback!
Just saw your video on the IC-705. My goal is for a backpack radio, powered by a LiFePO4 battery and solar panel. Antenna would be a buddistick. Joined an Icom 705 group and found it was an Icom love fest. I left the group. My thoughts are for the Xiego G 90. It is adjustable 0 to 20 watts. The 705 is 5 W internal battery, 10 W external battery. The Xiegu also has an antenna tuner. Also, it's 1/3 the price of the 705. Dennis, KD2MIP
Yep, agreed.
OK in 2024 I have added a 705, 10 watts from the radio into a sailor marine amplifier 300 watts out. I am happy, if I want to go out I can take radio out too.
Very good advice! I second your thoughts.. The answer is use the correct tool for the job. I have a Ft-991a in my go box(trailer) I also have a FT-817 for backpacking. If there was a 100W version of the IC-705 in the works I'd buy it. I can't justify a IC-705 because I already have a qrp. I wouldthoughts. Have the built in sound card and sdr features on the IC-705. I love my IC-9700 for VHF/UHF. It a great radio. I've been a yaesu man for the last 20 years but I'm slowly becoming an Icom convert. The new Icom interfaces are much more user friendly than any of last generation radios of any maker...
I have also been a Yaesu man, but I feel that icom is making up lost ground. I already ordered my icom ic-7300 and I think it will not be the only one. Icom is easier to operate.
My home rig is an nIC-7200. My Mobile HF is an FT-891. For High Band in the car I have an FTM-200.
QRP aside, When you pass your first licence here in the UK you can't transmit higher power than 10W anyway. I do have the 7300 though (I just set the TX power to 10w).
I agree, still I like the portability and all the functionality for a physically small size radio. Plus, it has a removable battery. I got a Xiegu X6100 and I'm very happy with it, I'm thinking I may get an Icom IC-705 and I guarantee I will use it the most. I also plan to go to a HAM swap meet to find a large full size base station HF transceiver. In my neighborhood, I'm very content with an HT. The IC-705 makes me very comfortable to use with solar and external batteries, living off grid.
I started my HAM lifestyle with small radios and making the most out of them.
Not sure about others here, for us, the cost was a factor as well as the low RF output, This rig would have been great when the solar cycle was at its peak, but sadly that is not the situation now.
We won't go outside DXing with less than 25 Watt available those days.
Some are waiting to see how the IC-705 touch screen will fair under the sun's destructive rays.
A few have reported ongoing problems with the IC-7610 screens ( strangely we never heard of this problem related to the IC-7300 nor our personal IC-9700) so not sure what this is all about or if it is relevant here at all ( we don't know much about the IC-705 screen, one would think they are different? ) but because it was raised we are giving it a mention.
Completely different screens. The 7610 is a 7" screen. 7300 and 9700 were 4.3" screens. Size doesn't have anything to do with it. They were just a completely different screen with quality issues that have been fixed (reportedly).
I don't get the issue with the IC-7300's screen in the sun. I have used it many times and never had an issue, but I have heard many others report it.
The issue is simple, it's an Icom
Icom is one of my favorites
I have two IC-7100 rigs, one in my car and the other at home... and can also take it in my Caravan here in Australia.. Cheers.
That is a good model.
I own have owned and operated, for years and not just for a review, the Yeasu 817 and Icom 703+, 706, 7000, 7300, and 705. The 817, 703, and now the 705 were/are used extensively camping and backpacking. The 705, at 16 ounces, is simply years ahead of them technologically, as well it should be. The myriad of 705 digital modes and it's performance is phenomenal. I have done side by side comparisons in the field of the 817, 703, and 705 and the 705 is in a class of its own. Given a good antenna, an end fed with an Icom AH-4 while camping and resonant dipoles while backpacking, I have had the time of my life! At home, in a many side-by-side 705 and 7300 comparisons, the 7300 always wins. But, no surprises there. What may be of interest to others is comparing my Icom IC-7300 to my Collins 75S-3C. I felt for certain that the 7300 would walk all over the 75S-3C, but that wasn't the case as it was a tie, with the 3C audio (with a separate collins speaker) so, so much better. But, of course, the 7300 trounced the 3C when it came time to isolate weak signals adjacent to a powerful signal, owing to all the 7300's bells and whistles. In the final analysis I would not recommend a newbie ham getting any QRP rig, including the 705 as their first rig as they are likely to become frustrated not being able to work everyone. The 705 costs $1300 (without a tuner) and a 7300 (with a tuner) can be had for $1000. That's a no brainer for me, assuming you can afford it. And the 7300 can be taken camping, albeit with the right power supply (battery in my case). At any rate, I have been a ham for some 56 years, licensed in 3 different countries, and I am still enjoying the ride (took my VW Camper thru Europe and the Mideast in the 80's). And it's sure been a lot of fun watching the technology change and adapting to it..! Hmmm, if I can now just get a certain self proclaimed IC-705 reviewing genius who complained about the 705 having a plastic case instead of a metal one to understand that GPS signals do not penetrate metal or water... So don't go putting a GPS equipped rig in a metal bug out bag, hi, unless it has an external GPS antenna. 73's and best regards to all.
Always a great video.......Technically 5w is qrp not 10w. All HF radios are qrp because you can turn the power down to 5w. So why would anybody buy a QRP only radio. I dunno. An FT-891 is a small SDR radio for a reasonable price, or an FT-857, or an IC-706mkIIg which is a really versatile radio. Lots of better choices than a QRP only radio.
Xiegu G90 is a decent radio that covers 160 to 10m with 20 watts and it under $500
Correct.
I have a Xiegu G90 and really like it. 20 watts qrp size and internal antenna tuner and decodes cw.and i bought it on sale for $450 dollars and not the $1,300.00 Icom is wanting for the 705 icom. I might have been interested in the 705 but personally I really like an internal antenna tuner and the 705 does NOT have one.
My FT817 (5watts max) was my main rig for years. Worked 80 DXCC with QRP. And I love it. 73 PAØK
That is AWESOME! I've done the same thing with a LNR LD-11. The purpose of the video was to define what QRP is, but once someone understands that, QRP can be quite fun!
Great review. I have had my license since 1965. I think your advice about QRP is great for new hams. However, I think that people should not under estimate the power of 10 watts. I have had very good luck talking around the world with ten watts with the right antenna. js'g
My first radio was an Icom IC-718. 100 watts and half the price of the 705. My current rig that replaced the 718 is the KX3. I rarely operate more than 5 watts. If I can't get through I just move on. For me it isn't the power but the antenna. Good video. 73!!! de KE5ES
when people ask me what radio to but I just say 7300 as it is now industry standard TX audio and is a SDR...anything else does not justify the price tag. Oh and the 705 owners will always want more than the QRP power so the 7300 etc. are obvious choices. The 705 would be useful only as like Jason says a backpackers rig or SOTA.
I just watched just north of London, U.K. as one guy were using IC-705, it has great receiver, as other guy were coming in S 9, as other guy has pretty weak signal with no meter reading on IC-705 as of; in CB lingo is called: PEANUT-WHISTLE. In Ham term; is called; QRP that doesn't means: Quickly-Reduced-Power.
I was going to hold out for the IC-705, but ended up getting a Xiegu G90 earlier this year. Glad I did, great portable radio with an incredible built in ATU and a more usable 20w power. Now they have just added FM via a firmware update. Considering this cost 1/3rd of the price of the IC-705 it's exceptional value for money. Granted it doesn't have 2m but I have a Kenwood TR-751 for that.
5W output power is absolutely enough, at least in Europe. I make dozens of SOTA contacts with my 818 and no tuner but a resonant EFHW antenna.
The 705 has to proven robust and throughly tested in the field, otherwise I'll stick with the lab599 transceiver.
I will stay with my G90 Xiegu with 20 watts, antenna tuner, antenna analyzer and it is built like a small tank. If I need more power, I will take my FT 891 installed in a manpack.
@@TXLorenzo I do have the G90 and I am extremely satisfied. Out of the box a QSO with Italy and UK on 20m SSB from FK68vj.
I said I wouldn't buy it but I just bought the 705, should have it by the weekend or early next week.
I bought the 818 around 5 months ago lol, if the 705 is good I will sell the 818, I do like the 818, it's got really good audio and it's very rugged. Been having fun with a DL1DN whip and a MFJ-1820T whip, when conditions are good QRP works even with compromised antennas as long as the other station has a good antenna and they are loud with you they should hear you.
Connected to my base antenna a 8010 49:1 does make a big difference.
I'm also having fun QRP with a MFJ-935C loop tuner and their 9232 qrp tuner and 5 watts.
Jason, what are your recommendations for a backpack/battery HF that's not solely designed for QRP? I have big mtns here and I'd like to really reach out of possible....but I also have big legs so a few extra pounds of kit is ok. 20-50w maybe?? I feel like I want to be in a niche no one cares about right now.
I am not aware of ANY HF radio with a battery that isn't designed for QRP. You can't really have a radio with an internal battery that runs 100w (if I understand correctly what you are asking) - Several SOTA guys that I know are using a Bioenno battery with a Yaesu FT-891, which is small and light-weight, but not QRP.
Ham Radio 2.0 ok great! I'm sorry if my terminology was confusing. I'm quite new to this. The guidelines of QRP aren't of interest to me...but the smaller form factor/lightweight HFs are, although I understand performance comes at a price and I'm will to bear that as increased poundage on my back. I'm thinking more like a civilization is broke at the moment comms not 5watts max SOTA stuff....although I plan on participating. I don't want output power to be a hamstring and lead to frustrating operation....considering it might be used for emergency comms. The minimum power necessary yes but I want to have juice in reserve if propagation conditions aren't optimal.
I hope this doesn't make me sound like a tin foil hat wearing loon....I just love the practical aspects of amateur radio a lot more than the artificially made challenges of contests or games.
Thank you for replying and any further intel.
@@MrButterpantz It sounds like you might want a go-kit built with a full-power radio, battery, perhaps also a power-supply, some type of charge controller, maybe a solar panel connection, etc. Something like that would be portable for setting up emergency comms, but it isn't really able to be back-packed up a mountain.
Ham Radio 2.0 That actually sounds perfect Jason....plus you'd be suprised what I can ruck up a hill. I don't want to monopolize your time here since the 705 and your video doesn't seem to fit my intended purpose. Care to get me pointed in the correct direction?
Search YT for "ham radio go kit" - I don't have a video finished yet, but I am working on one.
Darn it already paid for it! lol just kidding 705 will be a lot better than my 817ND for my needs, no regrets besides a tad pricey.
I would much rather have a 705 over the 817
I'm liking the 705 waterfall technology but not the 10 watt x ing power output. But the 705 can be modified for CB bands as well.
The 7100 is a more versatile unit in its form factor. Divorced so the head is easily placed within handy reach without the bulky main radio unit. So what's the best solution? Wait for the 7100 to be upgraded with a colour waterfall screen? Or buy the 705 and a amplifier? They both will need a signal strength tuning meter as well .
I know you did this video 2 years ago so maybe ICOM has an upgraded version of the 7100 in production.
But only time will tell.
Thanks for your videos.
I'm in learn mode and I'm trying to absorb as much as I can.
I have already brought a Kenwood nx5800 k2 and am looking to buy a nx5300 abp5 or abp6 intrenslicly safe MIL SPEC handheld for $1300.00 CDN .n/c the battery & charger. That's another $320.00 CDN.But if there's a way of getting a tri band mobile unit for both base and mobile, then that's what I feel is best overall.
I'm just waiting for my IC 705 to ship. This will be my backpacking rig. I dont use HF that much, more VHF/UHF. Can't wait to try this out. This will be my first HF back packing radio. Any suggestions on what I can use to keep the battery charged while in the field? Keep in mind I have about 50lbs of food, clothes, tent..and misc.
Mine should ship this week
I'm not sure in the battery charging, will have to wait and see what options there are when I get mine
I have a 9 watt flexible solar panel with charge controller for an Elecraft KX2. Some of the newer battery chemistries are light weight but difficult to charge with solar. What I did was find some plastic 8-cell packs to hold NiMH batteries in AA and D sizes and wired them up with the appropriate connectors. Just make sure your IC 705 rig can run on 10.4 volts or less if you go this route.
I would like to have one as a wideband receiver. If this is not the case any alternative you suggest? Thank you!
I love my LC-192 so much that I got them to throw a 705 in with it.
Very good advice! I totally agree with your view on NOT purchasing the IC-705 as a base rig /first radio.
Thanks for watching!
Why not get a 100 watt rig and if you want to do QRP, turn the RF power down? I agree with Jason. Seems like a smarter thing to have the 100 watts if you need it.
Right
If you want an all band all mode mobile for your vehicle you are probably better with the ic-7100. It also makes a decent base station
Agreed
HamRadio 2.0 - I think you, Jason underestimate the Potential market for this QRP Rig.
people who like , Overlanding, Hiking , Trails Climbing and even Backyard Camping , and just using the Radio Outdoors will Enjoy using it.
moving a Full Power Rig outdoors in Weather , it not going to work.
you will have to run Extinsinon Cables and even a Generator.
you can run IC-705 on Batteries and its Weatherproof and its so light to move inside to outside.
its like having a HT Rig thats not a HT .
I just got me a Kenwood TS-570S 100W rig and I love it.
Staying with my KX3 for portable sota/pota and for home my IC7610 and IC9100 works for me.
All 3 of those are great choices
@@HamRadio2 I know..I have all 3.
I call this ICOM IC-705 a super HT! A large HT above all other HT's. It’s basically 2 kinds of radios in 1, a QRP HF and a VHF/UHF/6m with DSTAR. Amongst all the DSTAR HT's, this ICOM IC-705 very much outranks them.
I’m thinking of the IC 705 with a tuner with the qrpguys DS1 antenna kit for my sailboat - emphasizing cw- and to portably bring back home for backyard use same way, and bringing on vacations same way- make sense?
If you know what QRP is and want an IC-705 as a base station, I say go for it. Personally, I prefer Yaesu b/c the radios generally accept a wider range of voltages to power the unit. I use an FT-817N/D and an X5105 as base stations when I need a base station. Just understand what is meant by QRP and decide if that is what you want.
I'd like to get an 817 to test against this one.
You may very well have saved a newbie buying the wrong model. You made things very clear and explained your reasoning very well. Thanks.
Thanks
Great info for new hams! I run a IC7300 and an AL 811H as a base unit and about half way thru the video I'm thinking, mention the IC 7100 which I run mobile and I think is the perfect set-up.
It seems so simple that these are tools for can be a really fancy hammer but if you're looking at a screw it just isn't the proper thing to get. Nice video clear and concise
Great Video. And you are on point about QRP as a base. Heck, I have done QRP in Central Park and have never made a contact. I raise the power to 100 watts and wouldn't you know, I made some contacts! Oh, less commercials please. A commercial every 3 minutes is annoying and disrupts the flow of the video.
I just looked at the commercials and they are set to only 1. But I can only control a small part of that also.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts and insights. I currently have a G90 , FT 857D and TS2000. Only the G90 has a water fall, which I like but Ham Radio Deluxe does too.
I could sell my TS2000 and buy a refurbished 705 or 7300. I never really used the full 100 watts on the Kenwood. Before POTA I enjoyed activating counties as I drove places. I’m now planning to become active in POTA/SOTA. When I was first licensed I was most interested in AMSAT.
However after more than 30 years being a HAM interests have changed. Now I am more focused on effective Antennas than the Radio.
73 Steve AA4SH
I was first licensed in 2005. I’ve been running a 705 for a few weeks on HF & VHF, great transceiver. 10W is plenty.
Very cool!
comparatively a Yaesu FT-991A is considered an all-band "shack-in-a-box" (160m--70c) radio and will do 100w on HF CW & SSB. GREAT video! Thanks!!! 73
Your unbiased opinions are appreciated.
Thanks