@@Matt-pd2cq lol this interaction your comment was just stupid, what you care is not what "we" care and what is for you a waste of time is not for "us" a waste of time
Potential buyers ... LMAO sir I won’t invest 1300 USD on this shit, I’d rather buy an iPhone. The same as those 5000 USD base station transceivers, no such thing as potential buyers if it is overpriced.
Great video. I used to work 10kW HF TX stations in the early 90s and I'm only just getting into the HAM scene now. While I understand the theory and general consensus, I still have lots to learn regarding specific equipment, antennas and hardware. Your videos are very straightforward and informative. Thank you
I am in the UK and just taking my Foundation level test, so I am just starting to look at what to buy for my first set up. This video has been very useful, thank you. You have shown me how important it is to check ALL the specifications before deciding. There is a lot of contradictory information around and I know that finally we each have to make our own decision, but I think the tone of this video feels right. Subscribed ! Pete on the England/Scotland border.
I totally agree with you. My first rig was an IC-7100. Yes, it doesn't have all the bells ans whistles of the 705, but it suits me fine as a base station, and it is also my portable rig. I am unable to backpack, but anywhere I can drive to and set up my radio, the 7100 works great.
I'm still looking for my first radio. I would like an all band. I'd like it for Home or Mobile I'm stuck between the IC-7100 vs the Yaesu FT991A Thoughts?
@@GaryWold the IC-7100 does all HF bands plus 2m and 440. It is an all round great radio. I am not familiar with the 991A. You may have to do some research. Also you might check the going prices on each.
Jason, what are your recommendations for a backpack/battery HF that's not solely designed for QRP? I have big mtns here and I'd like to really reach out of possible....but I also have big legs so a few extra pounds of kit is ok. 20-50w maybe?? I feel like I want to be in a niche no one cares about right now.
I am not aware of ANY HF radio with a battery that isn't designed for QRP. You can't really have a radio with an internal battery that runs 100w (if I understand correctly what you are asking) - Several SOTA guys that I know are using a Bioenno battery with a Yaesu FT-891, which is small and light-weight, but not QRP.
Ham Radio 2.0 ok great! I'm sorry if my terminology was confusing. I'm quite new to this. The guidelines of QRP aren't of interest to me...but the smaller form factor/lightweight HFs are, although I understand performance comes at a price and I'm will to bear that as increased poundage on my back. I'm thinking more like a civilization is broke at the moment comms not 5watts max SOTA stuff....although I plan on participating. I don't want output power to be a hamstring and lead to frustrating operation....considering it might be used for emergency comms. The minimum power necessary yes but I want to have juice in reserve if propagation conditions aren't optimal. I hope this doesn't make me sound like a tin foil hat wearing loon....I just love the practical aspects of amateur radio a lot more than the artificially made challenges of contests or games. Thank you for replying and any further intel.
@@MrButterpantz It sounds like you might want a go-kit built with a full-power radio, battery, perhaps also a power-supply, some type of charge controller, maybe a solar panel connection, etc. Something like that would be portable for setting up emergency comms, but it isn't really able to be back-packed up a mountain.
Ham Radio 2.0 That actually sounds perfect Jason....plus you'd be suprised what I can ruck up a hill. I don't want to monopolize your time here since the 705 and your video doesn't seem to fit my intended purpose. Care to get me pointed in the correct direction?
Click-bait, Jason. You've just gone down several notches on my list of ham radio reviewers who I like to watch. The title and thumbs-down visual on the title page is misleading. I understand what you're getting at for newbies but comparing a QRP radio to a 100W radio is apples and oranges.
It is Apples to Oranges. Yes you are correct. That was my point. THAT is the question I've been asked 2-3 dozen times. How would you respond? How would you explain to new folks, who just got their license, what QRP is?
@@radiobits3007 That's exactly what I did. Explaining something is done in the video, not in the title, so you contradicted yourself there, and assumptions made by you, I can't control. Having said that, yes the title was somewhat clickbait but in the video I EXPLAINED what I was talking about and I delivered the message that the title promised. Anything beyond that is really semantics.
@@HamRadio2 Hi Jason. Of course it could be considered clickbait, but with good intention - and it certainly got my attention! I was curious (and therefore clicked) as only a few days ago one of our new young hams on our local club net was seriously considering the IC-705 and imminently ready to purchase. His reasoning was the 705 was HF and VHF/UHF with D-STAR. (Most youngsters these days seem to be fixated on the armchair DXing capability of D-STAR via the InterNerd, but that’s another story). I was quickly on the ‘phone to him to advise the rig was QRP, for which he was very thankful. So, for me (and luckily for him), the “clickbait” worked as intended. Thanks.
Some food for thought: If QRP is a bad choice for beginners in the hobby, then why are Foundation licences in some countries (like Australia) limited to 10w? Spoiler alert: because if you focus your efforts on antennas, and understanding the basics of radio first, 10 watts will give you a lot of enjoyment and many, many contacts. It's a QRP rig, and that's fine with me. I appreciate your comments, and I DO agree with your comments, 100%. However I think the clickbait was unnecessary. "WHEN" in your title would have been a better choice than "WHY"... 73
Mind you, you'll not find an F call running 10w here :P That said, that is the idea. F call is to get you up to speed without causing any real harm to yourself or anyone else
@@shutthegate8232 Most beginning ham radio operators do not fare well with QRP on HF. HF QRP SSB is very difficult and a lot of skill is needed on HF QRP CW. I have tried it myself, with 35+ years on the air. Sure, you can make it work and the challenge is fun, but not what I'd recommend to a beginner. VHF/UHF operation often needs a lot of antenna and/or more power, unless you happen to be mountain-topping with the 705. This is not likely for a beginner. And beginners are not usually on the satellites. For VHF/UHF FM and DSTAR, yes the 705 would be a good rig, though an ID-51A handheld would do as well for about 1/3 of the price. If you just want to listen to HF, go to HTTP://websdr.org for free. I don't make the rules, but I've been around the block a few times and I'm active on the air this moment, in reality. I stand by my original post. 73 de Tim, WA5MD Dallas, TX
I recently bought an FT-891 for my portable/QRP needs. It cost $570 new on sale. It can run 5-10 watts when conditions allow & up to 100 watts when needed. I ran it on an 18 AH LiFePo4 battery in the back yard. I also have an IC-756 ProIII for my main base rig.
Guess what, I just got an ICOM IC-705. It's the VHF/UHF/6m, built-in FT8, TX and RX pictures, DSTAR, GPS, clock with NTP time sync, and WLAN features that make it a very superior rig. Lots of hams purchase the IC-705 and very much ditch their HT's. I really love the type of battery it uses and the touch screen.
100 watt,,,,, yup. QRP rig limits you all the time. I work QRP when I can, but conditions need to be right,,,,,, which is not that often. I work QRP by turning my full power rigs down, not buying a dedicated low power unit.
I’m about to buy an ID-52 or an IC-705. I live in a condo first floor of two stories, with a three story building next door, and a very strict HOA. I will be using the radio I choose from local high points nearby. I don’t own a car. First ham radio. Suggestions?
What is your purpose? What kind of operating do you want to do? The IC-705 has HF, so if you are just a Technician, you can't use HF yet (mostly) - so unless you are planning to upgrade to General soon, you won't need HF. Both radios have DSTAR and both do about 5w of output on vhf/uhf, but the ID-52 is FM only so you won't be able to do sideband. As a Technician, you have full privileges to vhf/uhf so you could operate sideband if you wish. Honestly they aren't the same radio, so you can't really compare them. So it depends on what your end goal is.
@@HamRadio2 Thank you for the info. I chose both the 705 (with mag loop as portable) and the ID-52a (as handheld on my back porch). With the 705/magloop I can speak with operators in Alaska and Canada easily.
I bought and paid for an IC705 for my new boat. So I can be Maritime Mobile on Lake Winnipeg. I have a KX3 but the batteries are a pain in the ass. I already have 2 IC7300's and an IC9700 and and IC7800 and more. It has it's purpose. It is a winner.
Great review, thanks for saving me some money. Just passed my General exam and am looking for an all band radio. I don't understand why we need separate radios based on frequency class... why can't I just find a nice color touchscreen that covers HF/HF/VHF for my shack? (not interested in a mobile UHF rig yet)
I’m thinking of the IC 705 with a tuner with the qrpguys DS1 antenna kit for my sailboat - emphasizing cw- and to portably bring back home for backyard use same way, and bringing on vacations same way- make sense?
If you have a minute to help - I am looking for a radio that can access as broad a frequency range as possible, but for listening only... I'm not interested in transmitting. I would like a waterfall display to see live frequencies close by. Would the 705 be ok for that or is there something better? Thanks
Excellent analysis. So many people are going to buy this, be disappointed, and sell it. 90 days after this radio goes on the market you will find a bunch of these used for $800. Not because there is anything wrong with the radio, but because people who bought it to be cool will be upset they can’t talk to Tokyo with it.
Thanks for the info. As a newbie (still waiting for my call sign) I have been confused by the jargon that is tossed around. You've cleared up some of it.
I've been hoping they would do some kind of IC-7000 Anniversary Edition that adds some of the 7300 features to a smaller, mobile radio like the 7000 was.
Hmmm. Holding up a just released $1,000+ QRP rig and a thumbs down? Just a little deceptive. I would have been more impressed if you would have presented the IC 705 and a first look, or do session on why QRP isn’t the best choice for a new ham.
Good feedback. I do plan to do that once I get the radio in my hands. But as I said in the video, I was speaking directly to Hams who are new to the hobby, who are looking to buy this new radio, but don't understand what QRP is.
I don't know that answer. I don't think it is full duplex, and it doesn't have 1.2GHz. But...you should be able to use it on 2M/440 the same way you can with any HT radio.
I'm just waiting for my IC 705 to ship. This will be my backpacking rig. I dont use HF that much, more VHF/UHF. Can't wait to try this out. This will be my first HF back packing radio. Any suggestions on what I can use to keep the battery charged while in the field? Keep in mind I have about 50lbs of food, clothes, tent..and misc.
I have a 9 watt flexible solar panel with charge controller for an Elecraft KX2. Some of the newer battery chemistries are light weight but difficult to charge with solar. What I did was find some plastic 8-cell packs to hold NiMH batteries in AA and D sizes and wired them up with the appropriate connectors. Just make sure your IC 705 rig can run on 10.4 volts or less if you go this route.
Nice radio, but it's for a specific user, 5w on HF these days is a disaster, unless your on ft8 etc.. plus no tuner, one antenna socket, no 70mhz, no way would i use it for a home station. I'm happy with 7300 & 9700, 160 -23cms 🙂
But Icom has thought about the home station with the soon to be released IC-PW2 linear amp. You can plug this in on your desk for a shack in the box and then take it portable for 10w. I know I know... Ziegoop can do 20 watts or whatever. If you follow the math there isn't that much difference between 10 and 20 watts. I would much rather have Icom quality over a Chinese tin can with a tuner. But that's just me and that's what makes this fun. I haven't seen the video but I sure would urge anyone to do their homework and think before buying.... 2 things that are lacking in our society. Carry on.
@@twohandsandaradio Agreed on the amp. I am hoping to test one of those also. 10 or 20 watts doesn't matter either, you are correct. I don't care it is only 10 watts over 20 on the G90 or 15 on the KX3. The basic premise of the video is to do research
@@HamRadio2 it's what I've sad ad nauseum.... a factor that people don't consider is "fit". Does the radio fit. Sadly a lot of times we don't know until we own it. I would say there will be some serious "this isn't for me" fire sales. That's what I'm waiting for.
Totally agree. This is an incredible QRP rig. However, here is a caveat to this video. As a QRP rig by design, it’s incredibly efficient for "off grid" use. If your shack is designed as an off grid resource running on solar generation it makes sense as a base station with a PA-500 etc. (good luck getting one, 15 month wait)
Great info for new hams! I run a IC7300 and an AL 811H as a base unit and about half way thru the video I'm thinking, mention the IC 7100 which I run mobile and I think is the perfect set-up.
My very first HF rig was an FT-817nd....I don’t recommend it to people for their first HF rig, however I absolutely DO NOT regret it, for me personally....QRP forced me to learn antennas and proper setup. I still have the radio and I DO use it as a base station as well as going portable.....👍KF7CLH
I'd be interested in hearing whether your opinion on this (in particular, the part at 4:32) changes given the apparent discontinuation (or at least long-term unavailability) of the TH-D74A/E (because of, if my Internet reading is correct, a fire at the plant that makes their DACs/ADCs... the only factory in the world that made those particular ones. Oof.) And/or in general for you to talk about that. I was about ready to pull the trigger on one of those, and noticed they'd gotten de-listed on several sites... so now I'm pondering the IC-705 instead (for, for the moment, mostly home use, and probably mostly listening on HF, at least until/unless I get an upgrade -- currently a Tech). I like the idea of being able to expand into HF, even if only QRP, but I'd like D-STAR, and... yeah. IC-52 is also a potential consideration, especially since I've already ordered a HackRF One, and I could presumably use that for the HF listening side of things. But... I do like the idea of a nice physical UI (jog wheel, etc.) that's dedicated to doing this stuff right. P.S. [edit] - Other factors: I currently don't have anywhere to put up a fancy high-power antenna anyway, but 6:54 makes me think I should maybe take another look at the 7100, as well.
It's my first and only radio right now and it can go from desk to truck in 5 minutes. Really like the radio and if icom unlocked or added customizing some of the menus it would have been excellent rig.
Jason, your advice on this topic is spot on! A NEW HAM faces MANY challenges! If they spend a lot of cash and have a frustrating time making contacts (which QRP can do), they may hear folks but get frustrated when folks cannot hear them. I tell all new General HF operators to START with a 100 watt rig!
Yes, do both 100W and QRP rigs. Work on an off-grid portable system and make it work. I don't like the attitude of some people towards QRP. I recommend hams to have an off-grid functional off-grid QRP system while going about making 100W rigs work. Small portable solar phone chargers can charge HT's.
Great video 2.0. I was curious about the 705. I am kinda not liking the Yaesu 891 anymore....I never realized how noisey it it, but it just is. It's great for travel but lots o noise.
Yea Glad Some One Made This Video..I got A Budy i talk to on the radio That is fixing to buy his first good/new radio & he said some one told him the 705 But He is a New Ham & just Did not Know But We Got Him On The Right Path Now..Yaesu ft-991 or FTDX 10 Or The Icom IC-7300..He Has got them 3 on his short list..Just Trying to Find The Best Deal !
here is my take on the 705. I have my grandfathers hf rig, and i have an old boat anchor kenwood hf rig setting in a closet. I'm going for my general and the 705 being a modern radio that does everything (for the most part) is the golden ticket to setting up a minimal shack until such time as i can go through the big rigs and get them back on the air. a 7300 is the better base if you do not have a full pwr hf station. but if you do, or can get an older rig cheap then the 705 is spot on.
Excellent advice. Your first rig should be a rig that you can fairly easily make contacts with. You first rig should be in the 100 watt class. It doesn't need to be full of bells and whistles, but it does need to run enough power so people will hear you. Waterfall displays don't make it easier for people to hear you. QRP is a specialized mode that is fun, but can be extremely discouraging for a new ham. DO NOT start out with a QRP rig as your main rig. After you get a rig that runs at least 100 watts, and get some experience, then you may want to get, as a second rig, a QRP rig of some sort. And, before you take the plunge into an expensive 705 will bells and whistles, get a little experience with something that costs about $100. There are tons of choices from kits to full rigs. They aren't fancy, but they will give you experience . Low power is low power no matter how fancy your receiver is. You may find that QRP is just not your thing and you will end up saving a ton of money. Or, you may love it, in which case you can make a better decision about which rig is for you. I have a couple of QRP rigs, but if I had started out with them being my only main rig I would have moved on to a different hobby.
Good day all. I just received my ic705 today. Got a bit of an issue. When turning it on the only control that works is the af gain knob. Radio seems to turn on ok but that is as far as it goes. no buttons and no touch screen. Anyone have a clue or just bad unit?
Hi, Jason, I already have ftdx10 and ft-891 - what would you buy for a complete set in my case - one more Yeasy ( 818nd ) QRP for a complete set or Icom 705 ?
Exactly what I tried to explain to new hams when this was announced. 100 watts isn't really adequate on 75 or 160 these days. Between QRP radios and highly compromised HF antennas, this is a recipe for disappointment.
Waiting for the $ to drop slightly or pick up a mint pre-owned. Looks like a viable supplement to my FT818 hiking/SOTA rig. I see many disparaging the low 10w output. This rig is meant for highly portable in the field operation. You are not going far on foot with a 100w portable and the associated heavy battery required to power it. This radio is for those who do adventure radio (hiking, SOTA, POTA) you can do amazing things with the FT818 from a summit. The iCom 705 will expand this horizon. I am also into astronomy. A 6” budget reflector ($300)from a dark site will annihilate a several thousand $ professional grade scope from the bright city. In radio, high altitude/low RF is the dark sky!
Dude, I just ordered the Hardrock-50+ 100W linear amp kit for my ICOM IC-705. I'm also ordering the interface. Getting ready for winter Field Day. Something I really love about the IC-705 is Winlink.
That is AWESOME! I've done the same thing with a LNR LD-11. The purpose of the video was to define what QRP is, but once someone understands that, QRP can be quite fun!
Bought my IC 705 about a year ago. Love it, I also have an IC 7300 too, both great rigs. Each has its use, I like going to the park with our local club for its weekly/ monthly QRP sessions. The 7300 is most definitely my base rig, might run QRP from my motor home next time we go somewhere. If you enjoy QRP the 705 is most definitely my choice, though there are variety of QRP rigs available. From Yaesu, Xiegu, there are even some tiny 5 watt QRP rigs for just a couple hundred bucks. I’ve been playing with QRP for 20 years off and on, so I knew what I was getting into with the 705. My last QRP rig was the Xiegu G90, nice rig, screen was just too small, reminded me of the FT 817ND rigs I’ve had. Great rigs made lots of contacts. Screen was just too small for my eyes. I do agree that a QRP rig for your first HF rig is not something you want to do…unless you know what you’re getting into. I had the Icom 703+ great rig, not very portable, but can be done. That said, if you are considering a new or a first HF rig get something with 100 watts you will be much happier. I have know folks who bought a QRP rig for their first rig, 6 months later it would be for sale. Too frustrating they say, only 5 watts they say. Well, don’t say I didn’t try and tell you. Love QRP, can’t wait to get out again to play radio!
I also hold the opinion that the first radio must necessarily be 100W. The realization that you need a QRP radio should come by itself. For example, my first radio was FT-891 - a wonderful device, I can't say anything bad about it. But now I don't have a home shack, I work exclusively in the fields with a backpack. Considering that I work >90% of the time in CW, it made absolutely no sense for me to carry such a weight on myself. And I switched to QRP radio already knowing what it is, how to work with it, how to set up and use resonant antennas and being able to navigate the air. A beginner will only be disappointed that no one hears him. To put it quite simply - do not worry, novice friends, you will buy your IC-705, just a little later)
I'm in Australia and looking to get my Foundation license which is 10 watts maximum anyway, so that's one reason it interested me. other radio i'm looking at is a second hand Yeasu FT-879D. portable use camping etc as well as base station use is what i'm interested in.
If youu are in Australia and have the lowest level of license (Foundation), you are limited to - 10 Watts. You are also limited in the bands you may transmit on. So, you either buy something with extra power (and keep your ouput down) OR something with extra frequency range (and keep your hands off the TX key). I'd rather have the extra cover - and consider a PA if I want to boost the power later.
Yeah, if you wanted to say this wasn't click-bait, then a more accurate and reasonable title should have been used. Something like, "Reasons the IC-705 may not be the radio for you." The intentionally provocative title, with "NOT" capitalized, is click-bait. Let's be real. That said, it is a good video in and of itself. Good information and well presented.
Hi Kevin, thanks for the comments. I see where you are coming from, but I guess it depends on how you define clickbait. I had always heard the phrase "it isn't clickbait if its true" and in the video I delivered what I advertised in the title. But...everyone appears to define it differently. Either way, I appreciate your insight. 73
@@HamRadio2 Well, you have a title that goes against the common perception with a picture of you giving a big thumbs down. A clearly provocative presentation. That's the mechanics of click bait. Show and say something so provocative that the observer feels overwhelmingly compelled to click. I think that's a pretty clear example of what the term "click bait" refers to. A scan down the comments seems to confirm. But hey, it's your channel. If you're focused on view counts, I'm sure it works out for you. The only thing that bugged me was you insisting more than once in the video that it isn't what it obviously is. ;-) As I said, nothing wrong with the content of the video itself. The title and thumbnail just seems a bit disingenuous.
@@loughkb Webster defines clickbait as "something (such as a headline) designed to make readers want to click on a hyperlink especially when the link leads to content of dubious value or interest" - there was no dubious intent in this video because I delivered in the video exactly what I advertised in the title. Oxford Dictionary defines it as "content whose main purpose is to attract attention and encourage visitors to click on a link to a particular web page." - which could literally apply to ANY and ALL videos on RUclips with a customized title and/or thumbnail. Your definition is more of the "street" definition, which seems to be more commonly held by most people who have complained in the comments, even though the "authorities of definitions" above do not describe it this way. Provocative? Yes, true. Disingenuous? Maybe... but again, I delivered what I advertised. Focused on views? Yes. I am also focused on teaching. Why can't we have both? No one wants to put a video on RUclips and have no one else watch it - otherwise you would leave it as Private or Unlisted and just share it with your friends. I gave a direct and honest opinion about my stance on the topic, which was born from multiple viewers and commenters asking this exact question on other videos and social media outlets. However... Upon seeing how this one was received (still an 88% thumbs up at the time of this comment) I doubt I will do something like this again. Perhaps in a less controversial way, I might. I do like the experimentation aspect of it, and I do appreciate yours and others opinions and feedback on this and all of my videos (as I suspect you do too).
@@HamRadio2 It's all good man. It's youtube after all. Only 88% eh? ;-) We all need to stumble a bit now and then, I know I have many times myself. Hell, I've even had to post a retraction video a couple of times over the last few years.
@@loughkb Yep. 88% is lower than most of my vids, but it isn't too bad. And yes.. I have posted retractions before also, lol. It is all about live and learn. 73 and seriously, thanks for your insight.
I've got a few radios (shack, base, portable, qrp) and since I just ordered an IC705 I thought "well crap" when I saw the title. Now that I've listened and purchased my IC705 for (yet another) QRP / backpack rig for SOTA and POTA. I concur.
Licensed in 2014 as General. HOA and lack of a defined space for a dedicated ham shack led me to KX-3 and temporary wire antennas. Also thought I might do bike-to-site activations. Never did the bike activations, but never regretted the KX-3 decision. I've taken the KX-3 and a powerbank across the country on a plane, with wire antennas and SOTAbeams travel mast in my small checked bag. I'd never have bother with the equivalent of a 7300 and the associated power supply. If I get to use the KX-3, great, and if not, I didn't have to carry a lot of weight. Tough to make SSB contacts? Yes, at times, but I manage my expectations within the system capabilities.
Great review. I have had my license since 1965. I think your advice about QRP is great for new hams. However, I think that people should not under estimate the power of 10 watts. I have had very good luck talking around the world with ten watts with the right antenna. js'g
Hey Jason, I completely agree with u (I always click on ur videos regardless of the title). I absolutely love my IC-7300 as my full power base station ... but also love to be HAM portable. I've been struggling with the decision to buy a new IC-705 QRP (+ portable antenna tuner, + portable amp, + etc.) ... or just take my IC-7300 portable (without any of those accessories because they're built-in). Plus I already own an IC-51A digital handheld so that is my very portable digital VHF/UHF radio. The ONLY advantage for me to buy a $1300 IC-705 is backpack portability as you said. But then I would also want to buy and pack an ATU, amp, etc if I want more antenna flexibility and full power (another $300+). For me, it was not worth it. I love the look and feel of the IC-705 for the QRP form factor. But I ultimately worked out a small backpack carrying my IC-7300, lithium battery and WRC vertical and can go anywhere with full power (or QRP). The IC-7300 is 9.3 lbs and the IC-705 is 2.4 lbs (only 6.9 lbs difference). Just my 2 cents on why I decided against the IC-705 for my portable purposes. 73 KJ6ER, Silicon Valley
Just saw your video on the IC-705. My goal is for a backpack radio, powered by a LiFePO4 battery and solar panel. Antenna would be a buddistick. Joined an Icom 705 group and found it was an Icom love fest. I left the group. My thoughts are for the Xiego G 90. It is adjustable 0 to 20 watts. The 705 is 5 W internal battery, 10 W external battery. The Xiegu also has an antenna tuner. Also, it's 1/3 the price of the 705. Dennis, KD2MIP
Does the S-meter go up as the RF Gain control is lowered, like every other radio, such as the FT-991A & IC-7100, or does it lower all S-meter readings as the RF Gain is decreased?
I'm liking the 705 waterfall technology but not the 10 watt x ing power output. But the 705 can be modified for CB bands as well. The 7100 is a more versatile unit in its form factor. Divorced so the head is easily placed within handy reach without the bulky main radio unit. So what's the best solution? Wait for the 7100 to be upgraded with a colour waterfall screen? Or buy the 705 and a amplifier? They both will need a signal strength tuning meter as well . I know you did this video 2 years ago so maybe ICOM has an upgraded version of the 7100 in production. But only time will tell. Thanks for your videos. I'm in learn mode and I'm trying to absorb as much as I can. I have already brought a Kenwood nx5800 k2 and am looking to buy a nx5300 abp5 or abp6 intrenslicly safe MIL SPEC handheld for $1300.00 CDN .n/c the battery & charger. That's another $320.00 CDN.But if there's a way of getting a tri band mobile unit for both base and mobile, then that's what I feel is best overall.
Great video Jason! As a new han, it can get confusing to pick an HR, Mobile and base Station Rig. Common sense would dictate saving money by buying a rig that "can do it all.". You bring up an excellent point to consider......what exactly will you be doing and using the rig for? Those should be the first questions that should be addressed. Thank you for doing this video and addressing this point!n 73! - KC3PIR/Ted
As usual, the answer is: It depends on your needs.
Yep
The stuff we actually care about starts at 2:57. The stuff before it is a time-waster.
Time waster, like this comment
@@HamRadio2 Dunno man. Here I am year later, thankful I made this comment.
@@Matt-pd2cq apparently you still have an abundance of time
@@HamRadio2 oh yeah the fact that it took me a year to come back really says that, doesn't it :-P
@@Matt-pd2cq lol this interaction
your comment was just stupid, what you care is not what "we" care and what is for you a waste of time is not for "us" a waste of time
Thanks!
Click-bait! So what your saying is: "If you want a 100 Watt transceiver don't buy the IC-705." I think you underestimate potential buyers.
As stated in the video, this comes from many NEW hams I've spoken to
First time on the internets huh
Potential buyers ... LMAO sir I won’t invest 1300 USD on this shit, I’d rather buy an iPhone. The same as those 5000 USD base station transceivers, no such thing as potential buyers if it is overpriced.
There is a big clue on the advertising leaflet for the IC-705 to help guide prospective buyers what the radio was designed for.....
Great video. I used to work 10kW HF TX stations in the early 90s and I'm only just getting into the HAM scene now. While I understand the theory and general consensus, I still have lots to learn regarding specific equipment, antennas and hardware.
Your videos are very straightforward and informative. Thank you
I am in the UK and just taking my Foundation level test, so I am just starting to look at what to buy for my first set up. This video has been very useful, thank you. You have shown me how important it is to check ALL the specifications before deciding. There is a lot of contradictory information around and I know that finally we each have to make our own decision, but I think the tone of this video feels right. Subscribed ! Pete on the England/Scotland border.
I totally agree with you. My first rig was an IC-7100. Yes, it doesn't have all the bells ans whistles of the 705, but it suits me fine as a base station, and it is also my portable rig. I am unable to backpack, but anywhere I can drive to and set up my radio, the 7100 works great.
Thanks for sharing!
I'm still looking for my first radio. I would like an all band. I'd like it for Home or Mobile I'm stuck between the IC-7100 vs the Yaesu FT991A Thoughts?
@@GaryWold the IC-7100 does all HF bands plus 2m and 440. It is an all round great radio. I am not familiar with the 991A. You may have to do some research. Also you might check the going prices on each.
Ditto. 7100 was my 2nd radio...awesome rig...home, mobile, field...great rig.
Still clickbait. You could set the title to “When not to buy” instead of why. But video is fine.
Jason, what are your recommendations for a backpack/battery HF that's not solely designed for QRP? I have big mtns here and I'd like to really reach out of possible....but I also have big legs so a few extra pounds of kit is ok. 20-50w maybe?? I feel like I want to be in a niche no one cares about right now.
I am not aware of ANY HF radio with a battery that isn't designed for QRP. You can't really have a radio with an internal battery that runs 100w (if I understand correctly what you are asking) - Several SOTA guys that I know are using a Bioenno battery with a Yaesu FT-891, which is small and light-weight, but not QRP.
Ham Radio 2.0 ok great! I'm sorry if my terminology was confusing. I'm quite new to this. The guidelines of QRP aren't of interest to me...but the smaller form factor/lightweight HFs are, although I understand performance comes at a price and I'm will to bear that as increased poundage on my back. I'm thinking more like a civilization is broke at the moment comms not 5watts max SOTA stuff....although I plan on participating. I don't want output power to be a hamstring and lead to frustrating operation....considering it might be used for emergency comms. The minimum power necessary yes but I want to have juice in reserve if propagation conditions aren't optimal.
I hope this doesn't make me sound like a tin foil hat wearing loon....I just love the practical aspects of amateur radio a lot more than the artificially made challenges of contests or games.
Thank you for replying and any further intel.
@@MrButterpantz It sounds like you might want a go-kit built with a full-power radio, battery, perhaps also a power-supply, some type of charge controller, maybe a solar panel connection, etc. Something like that would be portable for setting up emergency comms, but it isn't really able to be back-packed up a mountain.
Ham Radio 2.0 That actually sounds perfect Jason....plus you'd be suprised what I can ruck up a hill. I don't want to monopolize your time here since the 705 and your video doesn't seem to fit my intended purpose. Care to get me pointed in the correct direction?
Search YT for "ham radio go kit" - I don't have a video finished yet, but I am working on one.
"WHEN" you shouldn't buy a 705 would have been more accurate
That would have worked also
Yeah but it's not click bait then
@@OffTheBeatenPath_ It's not clickbait anyway since I answered the question posed in the title and it was on topic
Click-bait, Jason. You've just gone down several notches on my list of ham radio reviewers who I like to watch. The title and thumbs-down visual on the title page is misleading. I understand what you're getting at for newbies but comparing a QRP radio to a 100W radio is apples and oranges.
It is Apples to Oranges. Yes you are correct. That was my point. THAT is the question I've been asked 2-3 dozen times. How would you respond? How would you explain to new folks, who just got their license, what QRP is?
@@radiobits3007 That's exactly what I did. Explaining something is done in the video, not in the title, so you contradicted yourself there, and assumptions made by you, I can't control. Having said that, yes the title was somewhat clickbait but in the video I EXPLAINED what I was talking about and I delivered the message that the title promised. Anything beyond that is really semantics.
Indeed. Always happy to do that. Thanks for your feedback, regardless
@@HamRadio2 - Goodbye JASON, I an done with this Channel.
@@HamRadio2 Hi Jason. Of course it could be considered clickbait, but with good intention - and it certainly got my attention! I was curious (and therefore clicked) as only a few days ago one of our new young hams on our local club net was seriously considering the IC-705 and imminently ready to purchase.
His reasoning was the 705 was HF and VHF/UHF with D-STAR. (Most youngsters these days seem to be fixated on the armchair DXing capability of D-STAR via the InterNerd, but that’s another story). I was quickly on the ‘phone to him to advise the rig was QRP, for which he was very thankful. So, for me (and luckily for him), the “clickbait” worked as intended. Thanks.
Some food for thought: If QRP is a bad choice for beginners in the hobby, then why are Foundation licences in some countries (like Australia) limited to 10w?
Spoiler alert: because if you focus your efforts on antennas, and understanding the basics of radio first, 10 watts will give you a lot of enjoyment and many, many contacts.
It's a QRP rig, and that's fine with me. I appreciate your comments, and I DO agree with your comments, 100%. However I think the clickbait was unnecessary. "WHEN" in your title would have been a better choice than "WHY"...
73
That makes sense, yes. The video was mostly directed towards U.S. Hams, but I can understand your viewpoint.
Mind you, you'll not find an F call running 10w here :P
That said, that is the idea. F call is to get you up to speed without causing any real harm to yourself or anyone else
Because the people who make those rules are not active amateurs who understand the realities of operating a station under current HF conditions.
@@bct5ak Sounds like that could be applied to the people making the rules in most situations :-) so far removed, they've lost touch with reality
@@shutthegate8232 Most beginning ham radio operators do not fare well with QRP on HF. HF QRP SSB is very difficult and a lot of skill is needed on HF QRP CW. I have tried it myself, with 35+ years on the air. Sure, you can make it work and the challenge is fun, but not what I'd recommend to a beginner.
VHF/UHF operation often needs a lot of antenna and/or more power, unless you happen to be mountain-topping with the 705. This is not likely for a beginner. And beginners are not usually on the satellites. For VHF/UHF FM and DSTAR, yes the 705 would be a good rig, though an ID-51A handheld would do as well for about 1/3 of the price. If you just want to listen to HF, go to HTTP://websdr.org for free.
I don't make the rules, but I've been around the block a few times and I'm active on the air this moment, in reality.
I stand by my original post.
73 de Tim, WA5MD
Dallas, TX
So.... If I want a QRP rig?
If you want QRP, this is the one to get
I recently bought an FT-891 for my portable/QRP needs. It cost $570 new on sale. It can run 5-10 watts when conditions allow & up to 100 watts when needed. I ran it on an 18 AH LiFePo4 battery in the back yard. I also have an IC-756 ProIII for my main base rig.
I agree, Bill. I am about to install a FT-891 in my Truck and possibly for POTA. All the best, 73 de KI5HXM
Guess what, I just got an ICOM IC-705. It's the VHF/UHF/6m, built-in FT8, TX and RX pictures, DSTAR, GPS, clock with NTP time sync, and WLAN features that make it a very superior rig. Lots of hams purchase the IC-705 and very much ditch their HT's. I really love the type of battery it uses and the touch screen.
100 watt,,,,, yup. QRP rig limits you all the time. I work QRP when I can, but conditions need to be right,,,,,, which is not that often. I work QRP by turning my full power rigs down, not buying a dedicated low power unit.
If you please, I have a question. Does wouxun have a kg-uv9k airband?
The UV9x series radios will received airband, but not transmit.
Ham Radio 2.0
wouxun kg-uv9k nat kg-uv9x !! ؟؟
Ham Radio 2.0
I bought a new one, but I have the airspace. Please how do I work?
Ham Radio 2.0
I mean airband
Ham Radio 2.0
I wait for an answer from you, if you please, sorry for the inconvenience
I love my LC-192 so much that I got them to throw a 705 in with it.
I’m about to buy an ID-52 or an IC-705.
I live in a condo first floor of two stories, with a three story building next door, and a very strict HOA. I will be using the radio I choose from local high points nearby. I don’t own a car. First ham radio.
Suggestions?
What is your purpose? What kind of operating do you want to do?
The IC-705 has HF, so if you are just a Technician, you can't use HF yet (mostly) - so unless you are planning to upgrade to General soon, you won't need HF.
Both radios have DSTAR and both do about 5w of output on vhf/uhf, but the ID-52 is FM only so you won't be able to do sideband. As a Technician, you have full privileges to vhf/uhf so you could operate sideband if you wish.
Honestly they aren't the same radio, so you can't really compare them. So it depends on what your end goal is.
@@HamRadio2 Thank you for the info.
I chose both the 705 (with mag loop as portable) and the ID-52a (as handheld on my back porch).
With the 705/magloop I can speak with operators in Alaska and Canada easily.
Oops! I live in Phoenix.
Darn it already paid for it! lol just kidding 705 will be a lot better than my 817ND for my needs, no regrets besides a tad pricey.
I would much rather have a 705 over the 817
I bought and paid for an IC705 for my new boat. So I can be Maritime Mobile on Lake Winnipeg. I have a KX3 but the batteries are a pain in the ass. I already have 2 IC7300's and an IC9700 and and IC7800 and more. It has it's purpose. It is a winner.
Thanks for commenting
Great review, thanks for saving me some money. Just passed my General exam and am looking for an all band radio. I don't understand why we need separate radios based on frequency class... why can't I just find a nice color touchscreen that covers HF/HF/VHF for my shack? (not interested in a mobile UHF rig yet)
My prediction is Icom wont be able to produce 705s fast enough, they're gonna sell a gazillion of them.
Likely true
They won’t be selling me one, too expensive!
I would like to have one as a wideband receiver. If this is not the case any alternative you suggest? Thank you!
Thank you so much for the insight...this video is a confirmation for me to move forward with the y.891. Appreciate you.
A much appreciated video thank you for the education!!
Our pleasure!
Thank you for taking the time making these great videos on *All Things Ham Radio*
Thanks! As I'm new to hf, this was a very useful video.
I’m thinking of the IC 705 with a tuner with the qrpguys DS1 antenna kit for my sailboat - emphasizing cw- and to portably bring back home for backyard use same way, and bringing on vacations same way- make sense?
Fantastic video. Great advice.
If you have a minute to help - I am looking for a radio that can access as broad a frequency range as possible, but for listening only... I'm not interested in transmitting. I would like a waterfall display to see live frequencies close by. Would the 705 be ok for that or is there something better? Thanks
It'd be ok but maybe a scanner would be better
Excellent analysis. So many people are going to buy this, be disappointed, and sell it. 90 days after this radio goes on the market you will find a bunch of these used for $800. Not because there is anything wrong with the radio, but because people who bought it to be cool will be upset they can’t talk to Tokyo with it.
Sales listed as "it's just not my thing". LOL THAT'S what I'm waiting for!!
Thanks for the info. As a newbie (still waiting for my call sign) I have been confused by the jargon that is tossed around. You've cleared up some of it.
Thanks for the breakdown on the 705, much appreciated.
You bet
I am thinking of getting one for a bedside shortwave radio that I can use for QRP when on vacation.
maybe it's time for a 7100 revamp. 7100 with a 7300 screen/features. I'll buy 1
I've been hoping they would do some kind of IC-7000 Anniversary Edition that adds some of the 7300 features to a smaller, mobile radio like the 7000 was.
@@HamRadio2 Now that would be nice!
@@geod3589 YES YES YES YES
Very good and fair evaluation.
Thanks Peter
Hmmm. Holding up a just released $1,000+ QRP rig and a thumbs down? Just a little deceptive.
I would have been more impressed if you would have presented the IC 705 and a first look, or do session on why QRP isn’t the best choice for a new ham.
Good feedback. I do plan to do that once I get the radio in my hands. But as I said in the video, I was speaking directly to Hams who are new to the hobby, who are looking to buy this new radio, but don't understand what QRP is.
What about using the 705 for satellite operations?
I don't know that answer. I don't think it is full duplex, and it doesn't have 1.2GHz. But...you should be able to use it on 2M/440 the same way you can with any HT radio.
If you can resist being an early adopter and the new shiny toy, wait a year and watch how many IC-705's are put up for sale on QRZ. Snag one then.
Agreed. The retail price will also drop, as always happens with new rigs
@@elevenbravoonepapa look at the 7300, 9700 and 5100.
Your unbiased opinions are appreciated.
Thanks
I'm just waiting for my IC 705 to ship. This will be my backpacking rig. I dont use HF that much, more VHF/UHF. Can't wait to try this out. This will be my first HF back packing radio. Any suggestions on what I can use to keep the battery charged while in the field? Keep in mind I have about 50lbs of food, clothes, tent..and misc.
Mine should ship this week
I'm not sure in the battery charging, will have to wait and see what options there are when I get mine
I have a 9 watt flexible solar panel with charge controller for an Elecraft KX2. Some of the newer battery chemistries are light weight but difficult to charge with solar. What I did was find some plastic 8-cell packs to hold NiMH batteries in AA and D sizes and wired them up with the appropriate connectors. Just make sure your IC 705 rig can run on 10.4 volts or less if you go this route.
I just got me a Kenwood TS-570S 100W rig and I love it.
Nice radio, but it's for a specific user, 5w on HF these days is a disaster, unless your on ft8 etc..
plus no tuner, one antenna socket, no 70mhz, no way would i use it for a home station.
I'm happy with 7300 & 9700, 160 -23cms 🙂
We don't have access to 70MHz here, but I was somewhat surprised they didn't have a European version that included that band.
But Icom has thought about the home station with the soon to be released IC-PW2 linear amp. You can plug this in on your desk for a shack in the box and then take it portable for 10w. I know I know... Ziegoop can do 20 watts or whatever. If you follow the math there isn't that much difference between 10 and 20 watts. I would much rather have Icom quality over a Chinese tin can with a tuner. But that's just me and that's what makes this fun. I haven't seen the video but I sure would urge anyone to do their homework and think before buying.... 2 things that are lacking in our society. Carry on.
@@twohandsandaradio Agreed on the amp. I am hoping to test one of those also.
10 or 20 watts doesn't matter either, you are correct. I don't care it is only 10 watts over 20 on the G90 or 15 on the KX3.
The basic premise of the video is to do research
@@HamRadio2 it's what I've sad ad nauseum.... a factor that people don't consider is "fit". Does the radio fit. Sadly a lot of times we don't know until we own it. I would say there will be some serious "this isn't for me" fire sales. That's what I'm waiting for.
"5w on HF these days is a disaster" I spent last weekend talking to the east coast on 40m @5w from Ca.
Totally agree. This is an incredible QRP rig. However, here is a caveat to this video. As a QRP rig by design, it’s incredibly efficient for "off grid" use. If your shack is designed as an off grid resource running on solar generation it makes sense as a base station with a PA-500 etc. (good luck getting one, 15 month wait)
This was helpful thank you
Glad it was helpful!
Great info for new hams! I run a IC7300 and an AL 811H as a base unit and about half way thru the video I'm thinking, mention the IC 7100 which I run mobile and I think is the perfect set-up.
What antennae would you use for an IC7100 for your car?
My favorite is the Comet SBB5
Totally agree Jason. Good video.
My very first HF rig was an FT-817nd....I don’t recommend it to people for their first HF rig, however I absolutely DO NOT regret it, for me personally....QRP forced me to learn antennas and proper setup. I still have the radio and I DO use it as a base station as well as going portable.....👍KF7CLH
Where can them hats be purchased?
I'd be interested in hearing whether your opinion on this (in particular, the part at 4:32) changes given the apparent discontinuation (or at least long-term unavailability) of the TH-D74A/E (because of, if my Internet reading is correct, a fire at the plant that makes their DACs/ADCs... the only factory in the world that made those particular ones. Oof.) And/or in general for you to talk about that. I was about ready to pull the trigger on one of those, and noticed they'd gotten de-listed on several sites... so now I'm pondering the IC-705 instead (for, for the moment, mostly home use, and probably mostly listening on HF, at least until/unless I get an upgrade -- currently a Tech). I like the idea of being able to expand into HF, even if only QRP, but I'd like D-STAR, and... yeah. IC-52 is also a potential consideration, especially since I've already ordered a HackRF One, and I could presumably use that for the HF listening side of things. But... I do like the idea of a nice physical UI (jog wheel, etc.) that's dedicated to doing this stuff right.
P.S. [edit] - Other factors: I currently don't have anywhere to put up a fancy high-power antenna anyway, but 6:54 makes me think I should maybe take another look at the 7100, as well.
I love when a presentation gets right to the point without beating around the Bush.
Less than 9 minutes to the whole video!
@MetalCoreMoto And yet you take time out of your busy day to come by and comment multiple times...
@@HamRadio2 I’m retired, but still have about 19 other things to do during my day.
Great advice, thank you for this
You make a good point. The 7100 deserves a second look !
It's my first and only radio right now and it can go from desk to truck in 5 minutes. Really like the radio and if icom unlocked or added customizing some of the menus it would have been excellent rig.
Jason, your advice on this topic is spot on! A NEW HAM faces MANY challenges! If they spend a lot of cash and have a frustrating time making contacts (which QRP can do), they may hear folks but get frustrated when folks cannot hear them. I tell all new General HF operators to START with a 100 watt rig!
Thanks Ernest
Yes, do both 100W and QRP rigs. Work on an off-grid portable system and make it work. I don't like the attitude of some people towards QRP. I recommend hams to have an off-grid functional off-grid QRP system while going about making 100W rigs work. Small portable solar phone chargers can charge HT's.
Great video 2.0. I was curious about the 705. I am kinda not liking the Yaesu 891 anymore....I never realized how noisey it it, but it just is. It's great for travel but lots o noise.
Yea Glad Some One Made This Video..I got A Budy i talk to on the radio That is fixing to buy his first good/new radio & he said some one told him the 705 But He is a New Ham & just Did not Know But We Got Him On The Right Path Now..Yaesu ft-991 or FTDX 10 Or The Icom IC-7300..He Has got them 3 on his short list..Just Trying to Find The Best Deal !
Thanks.
You answered my questions in under 10 minutes.
Glad I could help!
Thank you for this info. Good video
Glad it was helpful!
here is my take on the 705. I have my grandfathers hf rig, and i have an old boat anchor kenwood hf rig setting in a closet. I'm going for my general and the 705 being a modern radio that does everything (for the most part) is the golden ticket to setting up a minimal shack until such time as i can go through the big rigs and get them back on the air. a 7300 is the better base if you do not have a full pwr hf station. but if you do, or can get an older rig cheap then the 705 is spot on.
Excellent advice. Your first rig should be a rig that you can fairly easily make contacts with. You first rig should be in the 100 watt class. It doesn't need to be full of bells and whistles, but it does need to run enough power so people will hear you. Waterfall displays don't make it easier for people to hear you. QRP is a specialized mode that is fun, but can be extremely discouraging for a new ham. DO NOT start out with a QRP rig as your main rig. After you get a rig that runs at least 100 watts, and get some experience, then you may want to get, as a second rig, a QRP rig of some sort. And, before you take the plunge into an expensive 705 will bells and whistles, get a little experience with something that costs about $100. There are tons of choices from kits to full rigs. They aren't fancy, but they will give you experience . Low power is low power no matter how fancy your receiver is. You may find that QRP is just not your thing and you will end up saving a ton of money. Or, you may love it, in which case you can make a better decision about which rig is for you. I have a couple of QRP rigs, but if I had started out with them being my only main rig I would have moved on to a different hobby.
This sounds very logical to me.
Good day all. I just received my ic705 today. Got a bit of an issue. When turning it on the only control that works is the af gain knob. Radio seems to turn on ok but that is as far as it goes. no buttons and no touch screen. Anyone have a clue or just bad unit?
Haven't seen or heard of that issue myself
@@HamRadio2 Well it was the radio. The new one works perfect
Hi, Jason, I already have ftdx10 and ft-891 - what would you buy for a complete set in my case - one more Yeasy ( 818nd ) QRP for a complete set or Icom 705 ?
I never liked the 817/818 models. The IC-705 certainly has more features, even if I did like the Yaesu QRP ones.
Exactly what I tried to explain to new hams when this was announced. 100 watts isn't really adequate on 75 or 160 these days. Between QRP radios and highly compromised HF antennas, this is a recipe for disappointment.
The ICOM IC-705 comes with a detachable battery. I recommend QRP radios for new hams to experiment with off-grid broadcasting.
I'm new at this. I didn't understand the difference, and now I do. Thanks. I definitely get 10W vs 100W for a base station. I'm working on my license.
Excellent.
Many thanks!
Thanks for the video.
Waiting for the $ to drop slightly or pick up a mint pre-owned. Looks like a viable supplement to my FT818 hiking/SOTA rig. I see many disparaging the low 10w output. This rig is meant for highly portable in the field operation. You are not going far on foot with a 100w portable and the associated heavy battery required to power it. This radio is for those who do adventure radio (hiking, SOTA, POTA) you can do amazing things with the FT818 from a summit. The iCom 705 will expand this horizon.
I am also into astronomy. A 6” budget reflector ($300)from a dark site will annihilate a several thousand $ professional grade scope from the bright city.
In radio, high altitude/low RF is the dark sky!
should I buy a 7300 or 9700 iqom
2 different radios. 7300 is HF and 9700 is VHF/UHF. So what license do you have and what kind of operating do you want to do?
Dude, I just ordered the Hardrock-50+ 100W linear amp kit for my ICOM IC-705. I'm also ordering the interface. Getting ready for winter Field Day. Something I really love about the IC-705 is Winlink.
I'm not familiar with that amp, I'll look it up
My FT817 (5watts max) was my main rig for years. Worked 80 DXCC with QRP. And I love it. 73 PAØK
That is AWESOME! I've done the same thing with a LNR LD-11. The purpose of the video was to define what QRP is, but once someone understands that, QRP can be quite fun!
Excellent advice. Refreshing to see someone not being a shill for any particular new radio.
Solid breakdown of Icom options.
Love the 705.
Thanks
Bought my IC 705 about a year ago. Love it, I also have an IC 7300 too, both great rigs. Each has its use, I like going to the park with our local club for its weekly/ monthly QRP sessions. The 7300 is most definitely my base rig, might run QRP from my motor home next time we go somewhere.
If you enjoy QRP the 705 is most definitely my choice, though there are variety of QRP rigs available. From Yaesu, Xiegu, there are even some tiny 5 watt QRP rigs for just a couple hundred bucks. I’ve been playing with QRP for 20 years off and on, so I knew what I was getting into with the 705. My last QRP rig was the Xiegu G90, nice rig, screen was just too small, reminded me of the FT 817ND rigs I’ve had. Great rigs made lots of contacts. Screen was just too small for my eyes.
I do agree that a QRP rig for your first HF rig is not something you want to do…unless you know what you’re getting into. I had the Icom 703+ great rig, not very portable, but can be done. That said, if you are considering a new or a first HF rig get something with 100 watts you will be much happier. I have know folks who bought a QRP rig for their first rig, 6 months later it would be for sale. Too frustrating they say, only 5 watts they say. Well, don’t say I didn’t try and tell you. Love QRP, can’t wait to get out again to play radio!
I won't be around at 5:30. Hope to catch up later tonight. Looking forward to watching it.
I also hold the opinion that the first radio must necessarily be 100W. The realization that you need a QRP radio should come by itself. For example, my first radio was FT-891 - a wonderful device, I can't say anything bad about it. But now I don't have a home shack, I work exclusively in the fields with a backpack. Considering that I work >90% of the time in CW, it made absolutely no sense for me to carry such a weight on myself. And I switched to QRP radio already knowing what it is, how to work with it, how to set up and use resonant antennas and being able to navigate the air. A beginner will only be disappointed that no one hears him. To put it quite simply - do not worry, novice friends, you will buy your IC-705, just a little later)
Thanks. New ham here and you saved me from making a big mistake
Hey! Does anyone know what happened to the ICOM IC-7200? I used to have one and my ex-xyl kept it. WHere can I get another one?
They were discontinued - again. You will have to find a used one. I have one myself that I like very much
I got my IC7300 as my second HF rig. G90 was my first then sold it. I now really would like a IC705.
You may very well have saved a newbie buying the wrong model. You made things very clear and explained your reasoning very well. Thanks.
Thanks
I'm in Australia and looking to get my Foundation license which is 10 watts maximum anyway, so that's one reason it interested me. other radio i'm looking at is a second hand Yeasu FT-879D. portable use camping etc as well as base station use is what i'm interested in.
FVNLDQOIO
If youu are in Australia and have the lowest level of license (Foundation), you are limited to - 10 Watts. You are also limited in the bands you may transmit on.
So, you either buy something with extra power (and keep your ouput down) OR something with extra frequency range (and keep your hands off the TX key).
I'd rather have the extra cover - and consider a PA if I want to boost the power later.
Yeah, if you wanted to say this wasn't click-bait, then a more accurate and reasonable title should have been used. Something like, "Reasons the IC-705 may not be the radio for you."
The intentionally provocative title, with "NOT" capitalized, is click-bait. Let's be real.
That said, it is a good video in and of itself. Good information and well presented.
Hi Kevin, thanks for the comments. I see where you are coming from, but I guess it depends on how you define clickbait. I had always heard the phrase "it isn't clickbait if its true" and in the video I delivered what I advertised in the title. But...everyone appears to define it differently. Either way, I appreciate your insight. 73
@@HamRadio2 Well, you have a title that goes against the common perception with a picture of you giving a big thumbs down.
A clearly provocative presentation.
That's the mechanics of click bait. Show and say something so provocative that the observer feels overwhelmingly compelled to click.
I think that's a pretty clear example of what the term "click bait" refers to.
A scan down the comments seems to confirm.
But hey, it's your channel. If you're focused on view counts, I'm sure it works out for you.
The only thing that bugged me was you insisting more than once in the video that it isn't what it obviously is. ;-)
As I said, nothing wrong with the content of the video itself. The title and thumbnail just seems a bit disingenuous.
@@loughkb Webster defines clickbait as "something (such as a headline) designed to make readers want to click on a hyperlink especially when the link leads to content of dubious value or interest" - there was no dubious intent in this video because I delivered in the video exactly what I advertised in the title.
Oxford Dictionary defines it as "content whose main purpose is to attract attention and encourage visitors to click on a link to a particular web page." - which could literally apply to ANY and ALL videos on RUclips with a customized title and/or thumbnail.
Your definition is more of the "street" definition, which seems to be more commonly held by most people who have complained in the comments, even though the "authorities of definitions" above do not describe it this way.
Provocative? Yes, true. Disingenuous? Maybe... but again, I delivered what I advertised. Focused on views? Yes. I am also focused on teaching. Why can't we have both? No one wants to put a video on RUclips and have no one else watch it - otherwise you would leave it as Private or Unlisted and just share it with your friends. I gave a direct and honest opinion about my stance on the topic, which was born from multiple viewers and commenters asking this exact question on other videos and social media outlets.
However...
Upon seeing how this one was received (still an 88% thumbs up at the time of this comment) I doubt I will do something like this again. Perhaps in a less controversial way, I might. I do like the experimentation aspect of it, and I do appreciate yours and others opinions and feedback on this and all of my videos (as I suspect you do too).
@@HamRadio2 It's all good man. It's youtube after all.
Only 88% eh? ;-)
We all need to stumble a bit now and then, I know I have many times myself. Hell, I've even had to post a retraction video a couple of times over the last few years.
@@loughkb Yep. 88% is lower than most of my vids, but it isn't too bad. And yes.. I have posted retractions before also, lol. It is all about live and learn. 73 and seriously, thanks for your insight.
I've got a few radios (shack, base, portable, qrp) and since I just ordered an IC705 I thought "well crap" when I saw the title. Now that I've listened and purchased my IC705 for (yet another) QRP / backpack rig for SOTA and POTA. I concur.
Yes sir, great to hear! I am still loving my IC-705
Licensed in 2014 as General. HOA and lack of a defined space for a dedicated ham shack led me to KX-3 and temporary wire antennas. Also thought I might do bike-to-site activations. Never did the bike activations, but never regretted the KX-3 decision. I've taken the KX-3 and a powerbank across the country on a plane, with wire antennas and SOTAbeams travel mast in my small checked bag. I'd never have bother with the equivalent of a 7300 and the associated power supply. If I get to use the KX-3, great, and if not, I didn't have to carry a lot of weight. Tough to make SSB contacts? Yes, at times, but I manage my expectations within the system capabilities.
Thoughts on the 7100?
It's a good choice
I agree with you Jason, 100%.
Thanks
Great review. I have had my license since 1965. I think your advice about QRP is great for new hams. However, I think that people should not under estimate the power of 10 watts. I have had very good luck talking around the world with ten watts with the right antenna. js'g
Hey Jason, I completely agree with u (I always click on ur videos regardless of the title). I absolutely love my IC-7300 as my full power base station ... but also love to be HAM portable. I've been struggling with the decision to buy a new IC-705 QRP (+ portable antenna tuner, + portable amp, + etc.) ... or just take my IC-7300 portable (without any of those accessories because they're built-in). Plus I already own an IC-51A digital handheld so that is my very portable digital VHF/UHF radio. The ONLY advantage for me to buy a $1300 IC-705 is backpack portability as you said. But then I would also want to buy and pack an ATU, amp, etc if I want more antenna flexibility and full power (another $300+). For me, it was not worth it. I love the look and feel of the IC-705 for the QRP form factor. But I ultimately worked out a small backpack carrying my IC-7300, lithium battery and WRC vertical and can go anywhere with full power (or QRP). The IC-7300 is 9.3 lbs and the IC-705 is 2.4 lbs (only 6.9 lbs difference). Just my 2 cents on why I decided against the IC-705 for my portable purposes. 73 KJ6ER, Silicon Valley
Thanks for commenting
Good Info thanks
No problem!
Just saw your video on the IC-705. My goal is for a backpack radio, powered by a LiFePO4 battery and solar panel. Antenna would be a buddistick. Joined an Icom 705 group and found it was an Icom love fest. I left the group. My thoughts are for the Xiego G 90. It is adjustable 0 to 20 watts. The 705 is 5 W internal battery, 10 W external battery. The Xiegu also has an antenna tuner. Also, it's 1/3 the price of the 705. Dennis, KD2MIP
Yep, agreed.
Where did you get that fine looking hat?
I have them made locally. I am about to start offering them at shop.hamradio2.com - custom callsign hats
Does the S-meter go up as the RF Gain control is lowered, like every other radio, such as the FT-991A & IC-7100, or does it lower all S-meter readings as the RF Gain is decreased?
Very good advice! I totally agree with your view on NOT purchasing the IC-705 as a base rig /first radio.
Thanks for watching!
I'm liking the 705 waterfall technology but not the 10 watt x ing power output. But the 705 can be modified for CB bands as well.
The 7100 is a more versatile unit in its form factor. Divorced so the head is easily placed within handy reach without the bulky main radio unit. So what's the best solution? Wait for the 7100 to be upgraded with a colour waterfall screen? Or buy the 705 and a amplifier? They both will need a signal strength tuning meter as well .
I know you did this video 2 years ago so maybe ICOM has an upgraded version of the 7100 in production.
But only time will tell.
Thanks for your videos.
I'm in learn mode and I'm trying to absorb as much as I can.
I have already brought a Kenwood nx5800 k2 and am looking to buy a nx5300 abp5 or abp6 intrenslicly safe MIL SPEC handheld for $1300.00 CDN .n/c the battery & charger. That's another $320.00 CDN.But if there's a way of getting a tri band mobile unit for both base and mobile, then that's what I feel is best overall.
what kind of microphone do you have? I think it's awesome
Heil Pr-30
@@HamRadio2 awesome! thank you - K6LAD
Great video Jason! As a new han, it can get confusing to pick an HR, Mobile and base Station Rig. Common sense would dictate saving money by buying a rig that "can do it all.". You bring up an excellent point to consider......what exactly will you be doing and using the rig for? Those should be the first questions that should be addressed. Thank you for doing this video and addressing this point!n 73! - KC3PIR/Ted
^ham
^HT
Darn tiny keyboard....
Thanks Ted!
Excellent presentation!
Thank you kindly!