The Most Successful Aircraft of World War I | SPAD VII
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 окт 2024
- The Most Successful Aircraft of World War I | SPAD VII
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hello friends! Welcome to Aviation Mystery channel. Come to us, you will know the history and development of aircraft lines, aviation history from beginning to now. while delving into many lesser known stories of the aviation industry.
Please support us by subscribing to the channel. Thank you!
#AviationHistory
![The Fighter That Tried To Replace The Spitfire | Martin-Baker MB.5 [Aircraft Overview #82]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1CJWEc_sQkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
At everyone's request I changed the voice of the video in the latest videos. To provide a better video experience.
While it is nice to see pictures of old airplanes, the narration feels confusing as it does not have anything to do with pictures shown.
Yes, old planes are always good to see. Sorry I will try to fix that in the next videos.
Nice Vid.
Wow only 1000 rpms crazy how far we've come.
Sopwith Camel I think was a true killer of all WW1 aircraft.
It killed a lot of its own pilots too however.
Good content,and accurate,but unfortunately the computerised voice was a bit tedious and confusing at times
Much useful information here... Thanks !
Aircraft with superior speed and rugged construction along with good firepower win aerial fights when their pilots know how to exploit their characteristics. That's why Spad 13 was so good. Also, SE-5a and Fokker DVII for similar reasons. I'd feel confident fighting in any of these.
This vid is good in a way, but does not properly or usefully coordinate the narration with the visuals. Pity.
The Spad could be disassembled for transporting by road behind a truck by loosening guywires and the wings were 4 seperate panels and the wing spar beam ends inserted into holes in the fuselage .
On a 1 to 10 scale, this production gets a 5 at best. It could easily earn a 10 if the video was reedited so that the images match the narration. Sometimes the narration stumbles and repeats itself, so I would ask you to perfect the narration, and then present the proper images so they both match. You can hold on an image until the thoughts about it are complete. Why am I looking at a face when the narrator is talking about wing cutouts. Better to produce one quality product than twenty versions of junk. Best of luck.
Is this an AI film? Good effort but please read the script inyour own human voice. Would love that change. Also, please match your script to the pictures. But I like it!
Without any doubt, SPAD S.7 was the most prolific fighter aeroplane from WWI era, being in front line service constantly from August 1916 till the end of the Great War...
Spad 7 and Spad, 13 two of my favorites....
Very useful information. I built several models of the Spad XIII by Revell.
Thank you !!!
what does a nieport and sopwith have to do with a spad"
Sounds like English isn't this computer's first language.
Tôi đã thay đổi giọng nói của mình trong các video gần đây. Hãy theo dõi chúng để có trải nghiệm tốt nhất. Tôi xin lỗi vì đã làm bạn không vui.
Bullshit, The SPAD was fast and rugged but not as good as the Fokker D.VII or the Sopwith Camel/
the aircraft you are talking about are not matched to your narrative which leads to confusion, there's even pictures of thirtys plane with a radial engine.
I apologize for the error in the video processing. Thank you for commenting for me. I will be more careful in the next videos
narration put me to sleep. zzzzz thanks for the nap...
Thank you for the response and I feel it makes sense. I will change my voice in tomorrow's video. Please follow it and keep supporting me!
You might want to work on your text to speech.
VERY CONFUSING...
You really must dump the computer generated voice over! Roman numerals described as X, V one one are particularly annoying as are drawings of Sopwith Camels in a video on the SPAD. I watched it until 15 minutes 24 seconds then couldn't stand anymore! Your information on the development of the SPAD is first rate, you have obviously researched your subject very well, but providing images of things which have no relevance to the SPAD's history or to the soundtrack is just irrelevant padding. You can do better than this. 4/10.
Thank you for the response and I feel it makes sense. I will change my voice in tomorrow's video. Please follow it and keep supporting me!
@@aviationmystery453 Please don’t use an American voice. You should use an English speaker instead.
Sorry. Can’t take the mispronunciations and goofy computer voice. Im sure there was some good information. Too bad. Make the content all you, including your human voice. Out at 1:49…
While describing a plane while showing pictures of different planes is nothing short but confusing, very poorly done and even using very poor computer voice. Too confusing to watch, lost interest.
Thank you for the response and I feel it makes sense. I will change my voice in tomorrow's video. Please follow it and keep supporting me!
The generated voice isn't a favorite, but it's livable. The actual content is very good, and you've done a fine job.
Very good job.
A masterpiece of mispronunciation !
I'm going to toss out some other contenders:
Albatros D.III
Fokker D.VII
SPAD XIII
SE5a
Yeah, especially the D.VII. But the Sopwith Camel and the Nieuport 28 belong in the discussion as well.
Nieuport's French Wraiths.. XXII. Yes 28 also..
@@chuckschillingvideos the Camel destroyed over 1,900 aircraft - more than any other type. It is the most successful despite the difficulties flying it.
Hmmm. No Dihedral on any wings. I had heard that the Spad had a reputation as being unstable and difficult to fly
The Sopwith Camel had a prominent dihedral on its lower wings. Was it stable?
My aerobatic trainer, the Decathlon, had negative dihedral. Planes designed for maneuvers are supposed to be unstable.
It was not really known for being unstable. In fact, it was considered to be a good gun platform. Roll was not good nor was turn rate, but it was very fast and very rugged. The wing loading was pretty high for WWI. It had pretty poor glide characteristics and had to be landed at a higher speed than most WWI planes.
No dihedral needed as the center of gravity is below the center of lift just like a Cessna 152 or other planes with high-wings. Notice that most low-wing planes have dihedral due to the center of gravity being higher than the center of lift.
Excellent work bro
I'm glad you have a good opinion of my video. Please continue to support me in other videos.
One thing, guys,the SPAD was a French plane.
Very confusing. There is no way possible to appreciate all the information being narrated. There aren’t even any photos or drawings of what is being said. Too much information too quickly making this video useless.
changed my voice in recent videos. Follow them for the best experience. I'm sorry for making you unhappy.
Very poor video. There apparently was no effort to coordinate the pictures with the narration. The narration is also very poorly done. Computer narration is NEVER a good idea. The subject of the video is very interesting, but its unacceptably poor presentation makes it unwatchable.
Thank you for the response and I feel it makes sense. I changed my voice in tomorrow's video. Please continue to support me!
Nope. Computer generated voice makes it a no watch.
Thank you for the response and I feel it makes sense. I will change my voice in tomorrow's video. Please follow it and keep supporting me!
Why kilowatts and metric measurements?
It isn't an American plane. So why would they use Imperial measurements? After all there are only three countries in the world that still use the Imperial system. So why pander to the minority?
Because literally everything WW1 aero was designed in those measurements and nowadays only a couple of foolish countries still use imperial
@@ianturpin9180 i bet the galactic empire uses it too. u better hope, that palpy doesnt hear about this...
You really would be better with your own voice
pictures have nothing to do with this plane. computerized voice is beyond annoying.
Watch my latest video for better presentation. I changed them for the best viewing pleasure.
Computer narrators talk funny.
I have changed my voice in the latest videos, you can watch my latest videos for a better experience.
Pity.
Author! Read the books! Ukraine never was a state until 1991. It was Russian Imperia during WW1 . After 1921 that russian lands became The USSR. Good luck!
Thanks for your review. Surely you are a person who knows the history of your shares very well.
Thanks for video ! The WW1 history repeating nowadays… sadly! But aviation forever!
Ukraine was a state (two in fact) in 1918-1921 and conducted its own affairs until it was overrun, Western Republic by Poland and Peoples Republic by the Soviets. It's funny how Soviets wanted to conquer Ukraine, just to force UN to give it separate voting rights just to negate it very existence nowadays.
@@maciek_k.cichon Nieznaczny epizod wojny domowej w Imperium Rosyjskim. Najprawdopodobniej w tym okresie samoloty omówione w tym filmie były używane na terenie tych „republik”. Więc się mylę!
Ukraine was part of the Lithuanian empire before Russia was invented.
Synthetic voices have no credibility... like we are supposed to take our instructions from bots ?
If you can't narrate... don't post. Go do something else with your time... go call your mom...
Thank you for the response and I feel it makes sense. I changed my voice in tomorrow's video. Please continue to support me!
That was so bloody boring
What in this video makes you unhappy? Please give me feedback so I can improve in the next videos.
Horrible pronunciation of French…😱😖
I confirm
Watch my latest video for a better presentation. I changed them
That Larone 9 cylinder is NOT a "rotary" engine. Those are in Mazdas and Nortons.
You mean RADIAL.
maybe there was some confusion in my presentation. thank you for your comment. I will be more careful. Please continue to support me.
@@aviationmystery453 At the time, "radial" engines, with cylinders radiating from the shaft, also "rotated" around that shaft. So both the propeller and the cylinder bank rotated at the same time. Thus "rotary" is not altogether inaccurate.