While I'm aware of the practice I had no idea it was called "stealthing". Good to know =) Kinda creepy to think that if 81% support criminalising the act, that suggests 19% don't
Not really, the states have the power and the general support of the populace to differentiate on legislation in many areas. Also we don't need laws for all things, only those things that it is strongly important to be addressed as a nation or a state.
The new stealthing laws is refered as rape. If a couple have sex after the couple agree on the condition that the woman is on the pill. If she stops taking the pill without informing her partner the sex is no longer consensual. Does that then mean she can be charged with rape as the contract has been broken?
I agree with the basis of this video, however I wonder what your thoughts are on women lying about being on contraception (strictly re pregnancy and not the multitude of other factors for the pill for example). If you agree to have unprotected (aware of risks of sti) sex, predicated on her contraception only, it's certainly immoral and unethical at the very least if she were to lie in that respect. A curious thought!
I don't think education about the term is important at all. Ensuring the act itself is criminalised and the public is aware that it is a criminal act is what is important. Focusing on the term will just lead to confusion an allow for inappropriate legislation to be passed that could skirt the harms.
I feel that if you lay with a partner, you have already given permission and that's the price you pay. This terminology and ideology is simply a ridiculous liberal view!
While I'm aware of the practice I had no idea it was called "stealthing". Good to know =)
Kinda creepy to think that if 81% support criminalising the act, that suggests 19% don't
We need national laws on all things
Not really, the states have the power and the general support of the populace to differentiate on legislation in many areas. Also we don't need laws for all things, only those things that it is strongly important to be addressed as a nation or a state.
Always good to see videos featuring the Anne Kantor Fellows. Well done.
The new stealthing laws is refered as rape. If a couple have sex after the couple agree on the condition that the woman is on the pill. If she stops taking the pill without informing her partner the sex is no longer consensual. Does that then mean she can be charged with rape as the contract has been broken?
I agree with the basis of this video, however I wonder what your thoughts are on women lying about being on contraception (strictly re pregnancy and not the multitude of other factors for the pill for example). If you agree to have unprotected (aware of risks of sti) sex, predicated on her contraception only, it's certainly immoral and unethical at the very least if she were to lie in that respect. A curious thought!
that's called sperm jacking my friend and no they will be hypocrites about it
So make the law work both ways.
How is it they don't get caught?
I mean, if its because they're on something or too drunk, wouldn't that just be rape?
I don't think education about the term is important at all. Ensuring the act itself is criminalised and the public is aware that it is a criminal act is what is important.
Focusing on the term will just lead to confusion an allow for inappropriate legislation to be passed that could skirt the harms.
I feel that if you lay with a partner, you have already given permission and that's the price you pay. This terminology and ideology is simply a ridiculous liberal view!