Great playing! Thanks for posting. Great sound, and reverb! But I think the arpeggios are made a bit too fast. The whole sequence should be "slowed" down to half speed and let the delays play the notes in between that "makes" it sound fast. The arpeggiator should do 4th notes (4/4) to a basically 3/4 tune, almost a waltz. The delays makes it "swing" and bounce back, due to their delay milliseconds. Also the repeats/feedback are set too much on one of the delays (he uses two IRL).
Thank You :D you want to know code progress, right? Maybe..original songs chord progression is Cm------ Fm, Eb, Cm, Bb ------ Fm, Bb, Gm, Ab, Bb ------ Cm
@@spaceechoboy6050 Fantastic work! Could you let us know key by key how you did the progression ? For example C G Eb // C, C, Eb, G, C, and Eb, all the steps please ;)
Hi~! I'm not good at English. so, I used google translator. Inside the space echo, the tape is spinning and the delay time changes depending on its speed. If you intentionally move the connectors that are installed for the tape to operate reliably, it will become unstable and cause some distortion and delay time changes. And it sounds like this. Here are some clips, Inside of Space Echo and Nils Frahm's performance. ruclips.net/video/JJf8ACNPh5M/видео.html ruclips.net/video/xLNeZogTsK8/видео.html
Wow that's amazing. Is there any way to replicate that unstable sound you get by moving the connectors, but with a digital tape delay? I'm guessing not?
How about this effector? ruclips.net/video/eYda1k6AZuo/видео.html Among the digital effects I know, it is the most similar to tape delay. And H-delay of waves plugin - You can change the pitch value that is delayed by the rate and depth knobs, which can be used to give a similar effect.
Thank you for enjoying my video~! I don't know exactly what setup you are asking for, The list of devices I have is Desktop(windows), Cubase, RME Fireface UC, Adam A7X, OB-6 Analog Synth, Roland RE-150(Tape Delay), YAMAHA MM8, Roland A-49(Controller) That's All ! :D
The outro arpeggio section that starts around 7:35 - what exactly is he doing there (that you nailed by the way)? So, for most of the song, it's a simple 2-octave up repeating arpeggio, but for that last section - what is that? Is that an additional arpeggio or a new sequence that is then repeated? How do you create that last part in the song?
Hey man~ My midi keyboard(Roland A49) has 49 keys and the last phrase needs more octave, so I just changed the controller of 0b-6 from A49 to MM8 for a while.
That makes sense, but I guess what I'm trying to figure out is how you're getting the extra octave to delay coming in after the first octaves? What I mean is, if I set my arp octave from 2 to 3 (or even 4) it sounds very close - but the timing is off - in your version (and Nils version) there is a rest or a pause before the addition of the higher octaves kick in - know what I mean? If you just set the octave from 2 to 3 or 4, it's just playing a continues pattern with no rests, but yours has a rest between the lower octaves and the higher octaves...
I now understand what you want. But because of the language problem, I have no confidence to fully explain it to you. (i'm not good at English) Basically this is 2 octaves arpeggio setting. But the difference is the compositional note. The previous arpeggio section consists of three notes, but the last section consists of six notes. For example, in the previous section, C minor codes consist of C, G, and Eb, and in the last section, C, C, Eb, G, C, and Eb. And this is what happens when a delay effect is added to it. It may not be exactly the same as nils does.
Well I don't mean to be rude, I think you played it really well and it sounds amazing. But to me, some songs should not be touched; some songs are already the best they can possibly be and nothing that anyone does can improve it. Says is that kind of song to me. But who am I, am I right ;)
If he would've done a different interpretation, a modification, your argument would be more valid IMO, but he did it exactly like Frahm soundwise, and damn, I think no one with functioning ears could argue that he nailed it. I would not think of it so much as a cover, it's more of a homage to the song, and a damn good one too.
Bravo. This is it.
Beautiful, I 've seen enough covers of this song, but yours is the best til now. Thanks.
Finally. Someone did it, completely. Bravo yow...
Amazing job hitting the sound design spot on.
This is amazing loving the arpeggios
👏👏👏 YES! So well done-Nils would be proud. 🙂 Hope to see some more covers and/or originals from you!
Love the cover, you have good music taste.
wow, that was very impressive!!!
really BIG!
Brilliant cover.
juste sublime .. bravo..
Damn, that arp is ON POINT!
impressive!
Awesome work!
Superb
Magnificent
Great Job Dude!
fantastic!
This is beautiful. Can you talk a little bit about how you programmed this patch on the OB-6?
great cover
Sublime...
bravo
Great playing! Thanks for posting. Great sound, and reverb! But I think the arpeggios are made a bit too fast. The whole sequence should be "slowed" down to half speed and let the delays play the notes in between that "makes" it sound fast. The arpeggiator should do 4th notes (4/4) to a basically 3/4 tune, almost a waltz. The delays makes it "swing" and bounce back, due to their delay milliseconds. Also the repeats/feedback are set too much on one of the delays (he uses two IRL).
It’s a cover not a reproduction, i.e. his interpretation
@@danbentley8747 I hear something you don't, and you hear something I don't.. what shall we do?
Wonderful rendition. Could you tell me the notes/chords for the arpeggio, please?
Loved this! If you don't mind me asking, do you remember the patch details on the ob-6? Thanks!
great sound and setting ! would you mine if you will provide the notes sequencer ?Cm , Ab ...
Thank You :D you want to know code progress, right?
Maybe..original songs chord progression is Cm------ Fm, Eb, Cm, Bb ------ Fm, Bb, Gm, Ab, Bb ------ Cm
you are so lovely! thanks
Is it a sequencer or an arpeggiator that he/you use? Thanks.
arpeggiator...type in "nils frahm says preferences" here in youtube;)
@@spaceechoboy6050 Fantastic work!
Could you let us know key by key how you did the progression ?
For example C G Eb // C, C, Eb, G, C, and Eb, all the steps please ;)
No pants were harmed during the recording.
If you don't mind me asking, what are you doing with your finger on the Space Echo that gives it that trippy effect? Example at 6:34.
Hi~! I'm not good at English. so, I used google translator.
Inside the space echo, the tape is spinning and the delay time changes depending on its speed.
If you intentionally move the connectors that are installed for the tape to operate reliably, it will become unstable and cause some distortion and delay time changes. And it sounds like this.
Here are some clips, Inside of Space Echo and Nils Frahm's performance.
ruclips.net/video/JJf8ACNPh5M/видео.html
ruclips.net/video/xLNeZogTsK8/видео.html
Wow that's amazing. Is there any way to replicate that unstable sound you get by moving the connectors, but with a digital tape delay? I'm guessing not?
How about this effector? ruclips.net/video/eYda1k6AZuo/видео.html
Among the digital effects I know, it is the most similar to tape delay.
And H-delay of waves plugin -
You can change the pitch value that is delayed by the rate and depth knobs, which can be used to give a similar effect.
Thanks! Looks like that would get pretty close. Hey, any chance you could cover "For" by Nils Frahm?
any tip on how to do that on logic pro?
Awesome!!! What's your setup?
Thank you for enjoying my video~!
I don't know exactly what setup you are asking for,
The list of devices I have is Desktop(windows), Cubase, RME Fireface UC, Adam A7X, OB-6 Analog Synth, Roland RE-150(Tape Delay), YAMAHA MM8, Roland A-49(Controller) That's All ! :D
The outro arpeggio section that starts around 7:35 - what exactly is he doing there (that you nailed by the way)? So, for most of the song, it's a simple 2-octave up repeating arpeggio, but for that last section - what is that? Is that an additional arpeggio or a new sequence that is then repeated? How do you create that last part in the song?
Hey man~ My midi keyboard(Roland A49) has 49 keys and the last phrase needs more octave, so I just changed the controller of 0b-6 from A49 to MM8 for a while.
That makes sense, but I guess what I'm trying to figure out is how you're getting the extra octave to delay coming in after the first octaves? What I mean is, if I set my arp octave from 2 to 3 (or even 4) it sounds very close - but the timing is off - in your version (and Nils version) there is a rest or a pause before the addition of the higher octaves kick in - know what I mean? If you just set the octave from 2 to 3 or 4, it's just playing a continues pattern with no rests, but yours has a rest between the lower octaves and the higher octaves...
I now understand what you want. But because of the language problem,
I have no confidence to fully explain it to you. (i'm not good at English)
Basically this is 2 octaves arpeggio setting. But the difference is the compositional note.
The previous arpeggio section consists of three notes, but the last section consists of six notes. For example, in the previous section, C minor codes consist of C, G, and Eb, and in the last section, C, C, Eb, G, C, and Eb. And this is what happens when a delay effect is added to it.
It may not be exactly the same as nils does.
Can you explain how do you patched this. Arp is c, es, g right, up, 2 Oct.. Right?
C G Eb, 2 octaves. 1st inversion.
안녕하세요. 몇가지 궁금한게 있는데 질문 드려도 될까요?
It would have been cooler if the visuals actually matched the audio 🥺
bed tempo
sorry bad
Some songs should not be covered man... This is one of them
whitecoldicecreams why? You should tell me why.
Well I don't mean to be rude, I think you played it really well and it sounds amazing. But to me, some songs should not be touched; some songs are already the best they can possibly be and nothing that anyone does can improve it. Says is that kind of song to me. But who am I, am I right ;)
If he would've done a different interpretation, a modification, your argument would be more valid IMO, but he did it exactly like Frahm soundwise, and damn, I think no one with functioning ears could argue that he nailed it. I would not think of it so much as a cover, it's more of a homage to the song, and a damn good one too.
His cover was lovely and beautiful.