Library Chat #20: The Rise of Sunnī Kalām (3rd/4th Hijrī Centuries) | Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 окт 2024
- Please LIKE, COMMENT, & SHARE!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I► Credits:
Note: No musical instruments were used in this video, all background noise is human acapella.
Outro Nasheed
Artist: Ibraheem Bakeer
Produced by: MAQAMAT INSTITUTION
Copyright reserved and reproduced exclusively with permission for Yasir Qadhi's Official RUclips Channel.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I► Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi - Official Social Media Pages
Facebook: yasirqadhi
Instagram: yasir.qadhi
Twitter: yasirQadhi
Snapchat: snapchat.com/add/yasir.qadhi
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
© Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi - Official RUclips Channel
Where's the guy constantly complaining about no library chats? 😂. Hope he's happy
I'm right here 🤣
Theres loads of us saying that🤣🤣🤣🤣Alhamdulilah
I'm the real one 😀.And I'm extremely excited
A lot of us. Jazakallah Khaira :)
Kalam is bidah
I love library chats, you actually make me excited to learn. These things aren’t dry at all.
This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab
@Path of Sahaba lmao say that to the hanbalis who kept persecuting Imam Bukhari to such a point he kept asking Allah to Kill him and take him from this life 😭😭😂
I've been missing these library chats immensely.
This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab
A lot of this went over my head but I love the spirit of openness.
What do you mean "over your head"? May I know
These Library Chats are amazing to learn deep knowledge.
And it has an enormous effect on broadening the mind.
If these lessons would taught in all Islamic schools,
Then Muslim Ummah would be united again very easily Insha-ALLAH.
May Allah reward his efforts and forgive him insha Allah. May Allah increase his eloquence. I said some things about the sheik may Allah forgive me and I ask his forgiveness if he finds time to read insha Allah. I commented his lectures of Gog and Magog. We have to respect the Ulumaa because they are the most beloved in the sight if Allah, so saying bad things will cause the anger if Allah.
Can't stress enough how important your lectures are to my iman and connection with my deen
Finally these are back! History of Islam just so fascinating! Please keep these library chats going! This is truly gem! ❤❤
This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab
Man! I can't wait the next episode. This was a rollercoaster ride!
Loving these
9:17: Ikhtilaf between Ibn Kullab & Ibn Hanbal. (Allah speaks when he wants to, silent when He doesn’t VS As there is no change in Allah's sifat the speech of Allah is eternal (Allah is speaking eternally in a manner we cannot comprehend) and internally (not voice & sound, mind/jaat; Ghazali)
29:31: Imam Ash'ari's reason to write Al-Ibanah.
28:32-38:01- Imam Ash'ari
History is never boring with Sheikh Yasir.
On a separate note, I mean no disrespect sheikh but can I advise against wearing skin coloured tops on camera.
Sure
Who said anything about awra? It was a fashion tip dude. You’re the one making it dirty.
Dr. Qadhi thank you immensely for sharing the knowledge and spreading Faith ! May Allah bless you with the best of both worlds .
Will you please make a chat about Prophet Ismael PBUH and where is he buried ? And where is his 12 sons descendant .
Appreciate your time 🙏🏻
Excellent video. Looking forward for more
This lecture is absolutely gold! jazakAllahu chayr sheikh. I love you!
From the Ash’aris in the Netherlands, we send you salaam dr. Yasir.
Mashallah
Volgens jullie is hij een Taymi Mujassim lol hij exposed heel jullie Aqeedah
@@Firelord2nd u havent heard of the lecture and went straight to comment?
Salam from Indonesia
@@afei4989I did listen. Maybe 4 times again
God willing, this year you start your private platform. Perhaps on Patreon? There are many of us who will be willing to pay for that subscription. Please keep us updated on it, you mentioned it in your previous library chat.
I have emailed about this too and really would love to join a private paid learning platform.
If you're going to make paid content, please don't make it too expensive. The exchange rate between US dollar and my local currency is just too high.
@@Tk-ik2pp what is his email?
Jazaakallah Sh.
You might even start Series of Salaf -Ashari creed
SHAYKH SHAYKH SHAYKH😂 PLZ PLZ plz plz plz plz (plz=please) do a library chat all on khurooj. May Allah SWT bless u Shaykh Yasir Qadhi
He has often spoken about this topic. Search through RUclips.
For example:
ruclips.net/video/J7P57EKLwzo/видео.html
@@simpleviewer7445 JazakAllah brother
Al Hamdulillah. ❤️ Jazak allahul kheiran for continuing your library chat. May Allah reward you with jannatul firdaus for your efforts.
I know nothing about "Kalam" but still tried to listen to Sheikhs talk. Seriously, it's true what Sheikh said before the talk that "if you don't know what Kalam is, stop this video".. I understand nothing.. I will watch some of his other talks.. Jazakallah..🙂
You are safer not knowing it.
The companions of our Prophet were ordinary people and NOT philosophers. Which is what kallam means... speculative theology or philosophy...
Interesting.
If you ever stop this library chats I am gonna come to the US and give “Dharna” on your door step.
Thanks a lot I really like this one. As someone who is studying the Ashari Aqeedah it is nice having something in English that I can further understand the context. If you could go into the Mu'tazilah that would be great. Next to no one covers them even though they are very important in understanding why some theological doctrines developed the way they did.
FINALLY! I MISSED THIS SO MUCH! May Allah bless the shaykh.
Dr. Really interested in hearing your opinions on aqeeda post neosalafism especially sifat, I can hear the athari beleif in your talk non the less very important to hear an outside opinion on the matter . I have seen some that took the same path, as you mentioned, ascribe tafweed to imam Ahmad instead of ithbat and attributing the same to Ibn Qudama, Ibn Al Jawzi, and Ibn rajab amongst other hanbalis saying that is Imam Ahmad way and that the difference with Ibn Taymiya ithbat school is only linguistic . We really need your ideas here so that the ppl leaving thr strand do not attribute these meanings because of there animosity towards thst group instead of the real truth. Jazak Allah Kher .
This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab
ATHARI AQEEDAH VS THE PSEUDO ATHARI (PSEUDO SALAFI/WAHHABI)
These rightly guided Hanbalis would
1. Negate the human meaning; meaning not attribute it to Allah عزوجل.
2. Thereafter submit its meaning to Allah عزوجل
This is called Tafweed; which some 'Ash’ari and Maturidi schools did as well
-The Salafi/ Wahhabi do not do this hence they are not to be taken seriously when they say they are 'Atharis
That is because the blasphemously believe the human meaning is possible with Allah عزوجل
-The Salafi/ Wahhabi do not do this hence they are not to be taken seriously when they say they are 'Athari
That is because the blasphemously believe the human meaning is possible with Allah عزوجل
-As for Tafweed. Yes, it’s referred to as Tafweed with Tanzeeh. Remaining silent BUT clearing Allah from the Kayf "the How" and clearing Allah from resembling the creation in any matter
So it is remaining silent for the actual meaning.
However, The Wahhabi they say that they remain silent of the how. So they say that there is a Kayf but they don't the Kayf so they remain silent. This is what they claim and that’s a lot different from remaining silent from the meaning and clearing the Kayf, which is the Aqeedah of the TRUE Salaf us-Saliheen
The Athari/Hanbali creed are two types, one is a Sunni Aqeeedah the other has been Hijacked by the Pseudo Salafis/Wahhabi sect (i.e. the Anthropomorphists) !
1st The true Athariyyah creed (Hanbali Aqeedah) is from Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal رضي الله عنه which belong to Ahlus Sunnah Wa'l Jama'ah which is similar to the al-Maturidiyya and Asha’irah Aqeedah, which does not apply direction, body parts etc. to Allah عزوجل. But a forgotten school because of the Anthropomorphists.
2nd is the Hijacked Athariyyah by the Taymun (Pseudo Salafi/Wahhabi i.e followers of ibn taymiyyah, Ibn Qiyyum, ibn Abd al-Wahhabi, Albani, Bin Baz etc. ) who has hijacked the term, which is not part of the Ahlus Sunnah Wa'l Jama'ah and our Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal رضي الله عنه are free from Anthropomorphism, they apply direction, body parts etc. to Allah عزوجل .
The problem is today's Athari speak with authority about topics they have no understanding of nor are they qualified to comment on. Athari means only using what what said in Qur'an and Sunnah meaning they believe in the Words of Allah by whatever Allah meant when stating them and laysa kamithlihi shay. So a real (Sunni) Athari is the same in core belief as a al-Ash'ari and al-Maturidi only without deeper sharh or possible explanations.
Some Sunni Athari scholars: Shaykh Abd al-Qadir Jilani al-Hanbali, Imam ibn Jawzi al-Hanbali, Imam adh-Dhahabi ash-Shafi’i, Imam al- Laalikaa’i, The Tamimi family, Al Khalwadhani, Ibn Hubairah, Al zaghouni, Ibn Qudamah, Ibn Hamdan, Ibn muflih, Al Tufi, Ibn Rajab, Ibn Najjar, Al Mardawi, Ibn Balban, Mari' Al Karami, Al Saffarini, Ibn Salum, Ibn qa'id al najdi, Al Shatti Family.
@@zccau2316 whats not true ? Are you trying to respond to someone else ? Imam bukhari followed Ibn Kullab !!!? Go read khalk afaal al ibad for imam Bukhari yourself ( not parts from here and there ) and you would understand what school of thought he belonged to ...
@@fifafreebies8941 you are lost because you have zero understanding of the athari school and from what you have written, zero understanding on what tajseem is and 3olow is. I dont have time to educate you on this , the dr. Is talking way beyond your grade here, lets learn from him ... on a side note , never judge something without researching it yourself, dont listen or read segments here and there from ppl then make up your mind . Salam 🙂
@@saadallahchebaro8282 Imam Bukhari died because extreme Hanbali kept persecuting him. What are you On lmao?
Ibn Kullab
Al-Muhasibi
Al-Shahrastani (neutral)
*Abul Hasan al-Ashari* & al-Barbahari
masha allah . alhamdulillah.you are one of the best sheikh i have ever came across .your research on aqeedah is excellent. insya Allah i hope you will continue with your library chat. pls continue with your good work on youtube. it will be benefical for our ummat. there will be people criticize you as they are jealous or envy. success is the best revenge. keep up the good work sheikh
The digital dawah is very poisonous you should choose very wisely, there are very little that have devotedly presenting the fact with knowledge like Yasir Qadhi may Allah accept his effort and reward him Jannah al firdos.
I know in scholarship this issue was a big deal, whether to categories and not to categories the siffats of Allah swt, but these matter lets be honest only Allah swt can affirm and we will know in the hereafter and not something that effects taqwa and sincerity of imaan and your relationship with Allah swt.
Because how does categorsing and not categoring impact the everyday worshipping Allah swt.Its not a major difference in thinking, not sufficient to make a new sect. The only issue is of Qadr which can effect worshipping Allah swt. Its interesting to read history anyway.
What distinguishes Islām from other religions?
Its belief in the Creator (in Arabic, Allāh). Most religions believe the Creator is a man, some tangible entity, or some being that exists somewhere high up on a throne, or some kind of spirit.
Muslims believe Allāh, the Creator, has no resemblance or need to the creations in anyway whatsoever. Among the creations is darkness, light, time, space, directions, such as above and below, places, the heavens, skies, and everything else. This means the Creator existed before all the aforementioned creations, before time, place, above and below, darkness, and light. Thus, it is known and is the belief of Muslims that God existed without a place, space, and direction, and after creating them, is clear of occupying them. This also means the Creator is clear of being a man or volume taking entity, as whatever takes up space needs that space to exist, and Allāh is clear of need, thus clear of occupying space. Allāh is not an ethereal entity, such as a spirit, or a tangible entity, like a human. Allāh is the Creator of both.
Shouldn't it be noted that there were scholars from the Hanbali madhab who adopted Kalam like Abu Ya'la and others?
Assalamu alaykum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatahu.
As always may Allah reward you for your teaching and sharing with us these knowledges. I ,one of who has great interest in this kind of knowledge, personally got a lot of benefits from this lecture as well as your other lectures.
I am really looking forward to hear you about following progression of kalām development.
If it’s possible, may I say , I personally hope that you can explain and introduce some main figures (such as Al-Ashāri, Ibnsina, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Taymiyya …) in your future Library Chat would be great beneficial for deepening our understanding of whole concept. May Allah grant you and all of us beneficial knowledge towards Jannah.
He is referring to the Seljuks
Him: If you don't know what kalaam means please don't watch it is not for you
Me: ok. Sure. (continues watching bc curiosity peaked)
This is not dry Sheikh, this kind of unbiased content on intraIslamic history is rare.
52:28 😂 this „Ghuraba“ Argument some brothers make cracks me up every time
Jazakumullah Khair, please more of Library chat, very beneficial and unbiased
Why did you miss out on abu mansur al maturidi??
He was a big kalami if not bigger and more rational than abul hassan al ash'ari.
He also has a chain back to abu hanifa promoting the hanafi aqeedah
Mashallah. As always with the library chats on the topic of Islamic Theology and its history, a brilliant, nuanced summary.
There is very little on this topic for those who do not have access to Arabic or Academic works in English so truly grateful to Sheikh Yasir for taking the time to put these together.
أحسنت احسنت أحسنت يا ابا عمار
Wallahi I’ve learned so much from you.
May Allah preserve you and keep you on the straight path.
Love the athari/ashari back and forth by the scholars. But not by layman, then it's just annoying. What I don't understand is, all these scholars refuted and boycotted the forefathers of the ashari movement. Is this not a sufficient proof to conclude the asharis are upon deviation, especially if you consider the latter asharis delved more into ta'weel than the earliest generation
It was said:
WARNING--"Where," as in "which location" is INAPPLICABLE to Allah. The Creator of the "wheres" is not situated in a "where." Allah existed BEFORE the wheres without a where.
1. Allah is the Creator.
2. Allah existed BEFORE the creations. "Allah existed before the genesis of creation and there was NOTHING ELSE in existence."
3. Allah existed and there was no light or darkness, distance or direction, time or space.
4. Allah is not dependent upon the creations. Allah does not have a size, for that which has a size depends upon the space it occupies.
5. Allah does not develop and become something else.
6. After Allah originated place and direction, Allah did not transform, develop a size, and materialize in a location or direction.
The Muslims belief is that Allah ABSOLUTELY does not need or resemble ANY of the creations, and Allah does NOT require space and does not have a size, shape, form, or place.
Many cases where Salaf did taweel Imam Tabari's tafseer is full of taweel . Forgetting. We have mentioned above the Qur’anic verse,
"Today We forget you as you have forgotten this day of yours" (Qur’an 45:34),
which the early Muslims used to interpret figuratively, as reported by a scholar who was himself an early Muslim (salafi) and indeed,the sheikh of the early Muslims in Qur’anic exegesis, the hadith master (hafiz) Ibn Jarir al-Tabari (d. 310/922); who explains the above verse as meaning: "‘This day, Resurrection Day, We shall forget them,’ so as to say, ‘We shall abandon them to their punishment’" [emphasis mine] (Tabari, Jami‘ al-bayan [Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1405/1984], 8.202). Now, this is precisely ta’wil, or interpretation in other than the verse’s ostensive sense. Al-Tabari ascribes this interpretation, through his chains of transmission, to the Companion (Sahabi) Ibn ‘Abbas (Allah be well pleased with him) (d. 68/687) as well as to Mujahid [ibn Jabr] (d. 104/722), Ibn ‘Abbas’s main student in Qur’anic exegesis.
2. Hands. In the verse,
"And the sky We built with hands; verily We outspread [it]" (Qur’an 51:47),
al-Tabari ascribes the figurative explanation (ta’wil) of with hands as meaning "with power (bi quwwa)" through five chains of transmission to Ibn ‘Abbas (d. 68/687), Mujahid (d. 104/722), Qatada [ibn Da‘ama] (d. 118/736), Mansur [ibn Zadhan al-Thaqafi] (d. 131/749), and Sufyan al-Thawri (d. 161/778) (Jami‘ al-bayan, 27.7-8).
3. Shin. Of the Qur’anic verse,
"On a day when shin shall be exposed, they shall be ordered to prostrate, but be unable" (Qur’an 68:32),
al-Tabari says, "A number of the exegetes of the Companions (Sahaba) and their students (tabi‘in) held that it [a day when shin shall be exposed] means a dire matter (amr shadid) shall be disclosed [emphasis mine] [n: the shin’s association with direness being that it was customary for Arab warriors fighting in the desert to ready themselves to move fast and hard through the sand in the thick of the fight by lifting the hems of their garments above the shin. This was apparently lost upon later anthropomorphists, who said the verse proved ‘Allah has a shin,’ or, according to others, ‘two shins, since one would be unbecoming’]" (Jami‘ al-bayan, 29.38). Al-Tabari also relates from Muhammad ibn ‘Ubayd al-Muharibi (d. 245/859), who relates from Ibn al-Mubarak (d. 181/797), from Usama ibn Zayd [al-Laythi] (d. 153/770), from ‘Ikrima [ibn ‘Abdullah al-Barbari] (d. 104/723), from Ibn ‘Abbas (d. 68/687) that shin in the above verse means "a day of war and direness (harb wa shidda)" [emphasis mine] (ibid., 29.38). All of these narrators are those of the rigorously authenticated (sahih) collections except Usama ibn Zayd, whose hadiths are well authenticated (hasan).
Salam aleykoum sheikh, please continue to teach us those periods.
We need to know eachothers more in the sunni trands.
You help us a lot and gîve us a lot of key answers to at last get rid of our sectarism mind.
Jazzak Allahou khayran.
Love these Libray Chats.
So much I do not know, so wide is the world of Islam.
Man! Its been too long! Way toooooooo long! Jazakallah Sheikh. Next episode next week Inshaa Allah. 😉😁
Great job. Brilliant.
اللهم بارك
Wallahi sheikh, you saved my life. Your videos and lectures motivated me to take this deen more seriously and to always keep learning.
Finally, please don’t take long to do the next library chat
Wow, really changes perspective...because if u listen to some of the ashari preachers, you would think the first 3 gen were only athari because they oversimplified and never thought about it(also a suspicious characterization). Then the way ash'ari preachers present it its like : "we have nawawi, ibn hajar and all the big names and all 4 madhabs, only Ibnt taymiya and 3 of his students." This kind of propaganda paints an image that any and everyone just mass accepted asharism as if it were from Allah and obvious, As someone who learned the athari way of understanding aqidah this would make me think...
Now i realise with YQ talks that; malikis became Ashari gradually, Shafi'is too. Also rulers pick sides and then conquer lands and propagate whatever school their imam is on. wow. We gotta be careful learning from these shuyukhs they will be very biased on each side defending their madhab/aqidah strand and in some cases like the deobandis and azhari and madina uni; defending their alma mater. I realise now that they act like they are part of some kind of order that they must be loyal to...burst my bubble. Still i do believe ulama are successors of prophet in guidance of the ummah, we gotta respect them. We just have to stop being sheeps.
Also we have to wonder: YQ asks why are big name ulamahs in the different sciences Ashari; politics plays a role; but being ashari does not prevent you to be expert in hadeeth and tafsir and etc. Also how staunch were the big name ulamas in their Ash'arism, When i read Shurunbulali's fiqh book; the Aqidah chapter: you can't even know if it is Ash'ari/MAturidi. Yet Atharis and MAturidis/Asharis both can accept what it says.
Also thank you for Addressing Ibana.
@`Abdul-Hādi at-Turāni That is interesting; do you have some book or video in english explaining this about Imam Nawawi?
Yet the sheikh said and its well documented that Atharism in the past isn't same that of Ibn taymiyah time...
Amazing!! So important to understand the development.
This is not true. Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim, a muhaddith, the greatest muhadith followed the school of Imam Ibn Kullab as mentioned by Imam Asqalani. As did Imam Zahiri who followed the circles of Imam Ibn Kullab
@`Abdul-Hādi at-Turāni I have. It is clear. There is a reason why hanbalis kept persecuting Imam Bukhari and why he asked Allah to take his life
@Path of Sahaba I didn’t want? Who you calling a jahil? Say that to my face I’ll break your leg. You are the same people who would have imam Bukhari and Muslim boycotted!
14:32 On the other hand, you have ibn qudamah r.h(who was born shortly before al shahrastani died) narrating from imam ahmad that he said ‘… bila kayf walaa ma’naa’ in lumatul itiqaad. Alongside that, you have a number of other hanbali scholars, even before ibn qudamah like al qadhi abu ya’la saying that it is impermissible to describe Him as being everywhere or in a place, and it is permissible to say that *He is fis-samaa ‘ala al-‘arsh*. If we say he affirmed the meaning, he’d be contradicting himself.
Granted, there is a narration from imam Malik talks about kayfiyya, however the counter weight in the hanbali ulamaa’s works supporting tafweedh, before and after ash-shahrastani’s time, is too significant to overlook.
This is true and having looked inti this matter for some time now , when you compile all of the athars of Imam Ahmad , you find that without a doubt he is not a mufawid at least the maturidi way and some of the same athars include no manaa except the manaa that Allah described himself aside from it being an ahad which some like al khalal didnt accept. I would really love to hear the Dr. Opinion on this .
@@saadallahchebaro8282 just adding on to what you've mentioned; it is clear by gathering the various Athar of Imam Ahmad RH, that he indeed committed to Ithbat of the sifaat and consigned the howness to Allah. In essence, he committed to the Tafweed Kaffiyah and not Tafweed ma'niyah and this is in line with the Athari doctrine, as supported by over 100 narrations from the Salaf committing to Tafweed Kaffiyah and not Tafweed entirely. The lone narration that mentions Imam Ahmad saying, without a meaning and with a how, can be relegated to a refutation against the Jahmiyyah who denied the attributes in its entirety.
To assume that that one narration proved he followed Tafweed is odd since you would be disregarding the many prevalent narrations wherein he committed to the meaning yet didn't enquire into the how. Also there are two opinions regarding that narration the commentator mentioned, one being that it is a discontinued report and one that it is an accepted report but a refutation to the Jahmiyyah.
@@AliAbuH agreed though some neo-hanbalis claim that we have to use ta'weel to explain this specific athar of Imam Ahmad since taking it as by althahir would imply both kayfiya and meaning are unknown given that many hanbalis post 500 hijri where actual mufawida to some extent specifically on the manaa part . This is why I wanted the Dr. To elaborate on this point to clear it up since he touched base on it very briefly.
Estrarphirillah, how can you call Skeihh Ahmadt ibn Hanbal (rahimullah) indirectly as harsh ? Without these people we would have a pseudo, secterian Islam. We thank them for defending our religion.
Not a singl eword on Imam Abu Hanifa though. How did he fit into the picture? Was he as traditional as the other three Imams and how did his school view Kalam?
Unfortunately at least his followings were mutazilis later centuries they became asheri and maturidi
The debate with Osama Hassan of UK and other conclusions you had before, i felt that there was a huge gap between you and other intellectuals. On that basis, I think that logic and specially arabic ´classic logic is important especially equally important as grammar, rhetoric and etymology i.e. 'ilm al-sarf. So, did Yasir Qadhi studied logic? There are a lot of books, including Sulam al-Munawraq. So, i would like to hear your answer. I may sound critical but i'm honest too. Thanks in advance
I read a different story about why Ahmad bin Hambel disapproved al Muhasibi. Ibn Hambel and others were gathering all the ehadis they could find and being extremely careful in vetting the authenticity and wording of the ehadis they collected. El Muhasibi, on the other hand, was not as careful in the use and citation of ehadis as ibn Hambel was. E.g., el Muhasibi would not cite the proper source of a hadis and the chain of sources. That eventually led to a tention between the two giants of Islamic knowledge.
May Allah reward you Honorable sheikh for your work to unite the Ummah. Very beneficial to see that there are variant views within the Hanbali and Hanafi traditions. It seems that Al-Ashari and Ibn Taymiyyah were more moderate, with crossover views. Unfortunately the schools as they exist today are more rigid. The Imams of the schools did not see things as black and white as the followers of their schools do. The rigidity of the students within a school is problematic.
Also Shaikh you teach us that ijtihadi knowledge is a living experience through the scholars, similar to muhkam and mutishabihah. Why should anyone dispute regarding the speculative verses when there are many unambiguous ones? Do they want fitnah?
If possible, can you make an episode on Kalam Nafsi and does the asya'irah really believe that the Qur'an is not Kalamullah al-haqiqi?
Ashaarism moderates between Mu’talizism and Atharism
phew, library's back - Alhamdulillah! Almost developed acute brain rash, because library deficiency
Has anyone found the links to which he was referencing in regards to Abdul Hasan Al Ashari's works? 37:00
Interesting
Love you sheikh.
This is the first time I couldnt grasp what you are talking about... The disclaimer is really necessary.
Does anyone have the pdf "al ashari,a vindication of kalam" by Robert mc carthy
Ya doin it yaa dooin it yaa naughty Naughty !!!
Please come on Mufti Abu Layth mindtrap !!
Can someone link the Qadiri creed pdf that shaykh was talking about?
May Allah Accept your works, and make it a means of acceptance and Guidance for the Ummah!
I love your library chats you need to do one on music halal or haram
You can watch that in his Q&A Series
@@MuhammadZakyAbdurrahman yh need the link to that
Dr. Yasir, please after finishing this series of Athari & Ashari, elaborate on the Hadith of 73 sects wholisticly because I’d like to understand that Hadith in light of your stance with this matter (which is the same position I hold as well). Barak Allah Feek
can you describe to me what a hood or a gangster islam would be
Salam sheikh can we get more library chats plz
Alhamdulillah.
You always say, "it's been so long since..."
Don't do that.
Masha Allah, Masha Allah, SHK Yasir, you are doing great. JAZAKALLAHU KHAIRAN.
I love this series.
Jazakallah Kheyr Sheikh Abu Amman MashaAllah very informative talk on the rift between Athari and Ashari and how this difference of opinion was influenced by the politics and society of that time.
Looking forward to more!
Masha Allah may Allah reward you
I'm great full for the sheikh.
I think this is one the way to unites the Muslim, thought education it will help us to tolerate others and to understand there is human element or effort in all of the deferent groups of Islami
Tbis was amazing please explain the difference between ahsari anf maturidi later in future lectures
Sheikh u said ..
"I was athari salafism " ??
Does this mean u are still athari but not the athari taught in Saudi Arabia, athari /salafism ?
@ video 51:10 . Mins .
The difference between saudi atheri and general atheri is tolerance
Where is the #21 and #22?
I can't see those.
Amazing explanatory video, keep up the great work; jzk
Masha Allah Tabarak'Allah 👏 👍 💯 🤲
Jazak Allah khairan brother Dr.Yasir Qadhi..You are the best...Love you for the sake of Allah.
I cannot wait for the next chat please please ustad
Jazakallahu Khayran Ahsanul Jaza
The credits for the audio at the end please.
Alhamdulillah. I have been really waiting for these library chats. Please keep them coming
Ya ustad please make these regular
I am binging this❤️❤️
Please never stop making theology videos.
beautiful ❤️❤️
Missed library chats… keep coming often sheikh.
Alhamduleha....
How much we missed the library chats
Sheikh, thanks eventually for uploading one
My best among all of Doctor's productions!!
Very beneficial and insightful for the situation today
May allah reward the sheikh
Salaam from Nottingham Uk
💜
Can't wait for next library chat..
What ordinary muslim shld do if trapped in the tension between the two school?
What distinguishes Islām from other religions?
Its belief in the Creator (in Arabic, Allāh). Most religions believe the Creator is a man, some tangible entity, or some being that exists somewhere high up on a throne, or some kind of spirit.
Muslims believe Allāh, the Creator, has no resemblance or need to the creations in anyway whatsoever. Among the creations is darkness, light, time, space, directions, such as above and below, places, the heavens, skies, and everything else. This means the Creator existed before all the aforementioned creations, before time, place, above and below, darkness, and light. Thus, it is known and is the belief of Muslims that God existed without a place, space, and direction, and after creating them, is clear of occupying them. This also means the Creator is clear of being a man or volume taking entity, as whatever takes up space needs that space to exist, and Allāh is clear of need, thus clear of occupying space. Allāh is not an ethereal entity, such as a spirit, or a tangible entity, like a human. Allāh is the Creator of both.
A layman is only responsible of what he can affirm as something emphatically/unequivocally known to be part of the religion. Focus on the necessary aqida and ibadat and don't have extreme biases based on ignorance like some do
I was missing the library chat
Its been a while. I can't wait.
ما شاء الله عليك يا شيخ