KSP - Munar Express Cheats Challenge: Take Two

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 авг 2013
  • My second entry into Scott Manley's challenge.
    I suspected someone would beat my time for the challenge, and that credit goes Stun_gravy. I sort of suspected him or Scott would beat me so I went ahead and got a better time after I posted the first video.
    Stun_gravy's time was an impressive 7 minutes and 48 seconds. However.... My time was faster still: 7 minutes and 24 seconds.
    I don't know if multiple entries are allowed but I'm posting this anyways just to beat Stun_Gravy =D
    Music courtesy of Kevin MacLeod at
    music.incompetech.com
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 39

  • @scottmanley
    @scottmanley 10 лет назад +5

    But you've already won a prize, all that remains is Honor!

    • @chrisgaming9567
      @chrisgaming9567 4 года назад +2

      How does this comment only have two likes

  • @TheFan630
    @TheFan630 8 лет назад +8

    Reentry at 0.053% the speed of light, and the kerbaunaut experienced about 1576500KG of force (weight taken from wiki)
    Fuck me

    • @simbiote89
      @simbiote89 8 лет назад +1

      +TheFan630 And that's why ships in Star Trek have inertial dampeners, pushing from dead still to evasive maneuvers at 0.5c in a few seconds needs something to stop you turning to paste

  • @scottmanley
    @scottmanley 10 лет назад +2

    Macollo - I can't send you a message because you have contact lock enabled.

  • @SwithinFeely
    @SwithinFeely 9 лет назад +2

    my kidneys exploded at reentry

  • @dathaniel9403
    @dathaniel9403 8 лет назад +2

    At 110g acceleration (and ignoring relativistic effects) the distance required to accelerate to light speed would be x=4.16*10^13 meters, or about 278.4 AU. Pluto's average distance from the Sun is 40.7 AU, so that's about 6.84 times further than Pluto's orbit. To accelerate up to light speed by the time you reached Pluto (again, no relativity!) you'd have to accelerate at 752g, or about 3.5 times more than the highest g-force ever survived by a human, and 30 times more than what is typically considered the death/serious injury threshold (25g).

  • @cd3d850
    @cd3d850 10 лет назад

    this challenge would be fun with deadly re-entry!

  • @Anonie324
    @Anonie324 10 лет назад

    He's like a Homeric Greek. Honor is everything.

  • @tctrainconstruct2592
    @tctrainconstruct2592 Год назад

    actually, the rocket would travel 4*10^10km before reaching lightspeed, so it would already have left pluto's orbit by the time it reaches lightspeed.

  • @Stungravy
    @Stungravy 10 лет назад

    Well, I was planning on getting back to my BF3 videos, but this takes priority now.

  • @andreasheij
    @andreasheij 9 лет назад +1

    Wonderful music dude! :D Love it, as if I'm watching a movie! :D

  • @pauladoldfsen7242
    @pauladoldfsen7242 9 лет назад

    Very cool I did really like the kerbin reentry
    ;-)

  • @aarondianda6468
    @aarondianda6468 7 лет назад

    The ungodly sound that thing makes when you start it up lmfao

  • @opl500
    @opl500 9 лет назад +2

    Lithobraking, that made me lol

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 9 лет назад

    "In real life, this craft would disintegrate and vaporize..."
    Certainly it would.
    Although I bet it would be possible IRL to reenter at 160 km/s with a good enough heat shield. (A decent-sized Iron-Nickel meterorite, for example).

  • @50Calabyte
    @50Calabyte 10 лет назад

    This brings up an interesting question:
    Does KSP take into account relativity when traveling at light or near-lightspeeds?

  • @Alex-Lay
    @Alex-Lay 10 лет назад

    Abyssal Lurker just got 6 minutes and 56 seconds...

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 9 лет назад +2

    No, you would not reach C by Eeloo. You would need about 400 times more acceleration, depending on the orbital position of Eeloo.
    You would reach about 5% C by Eeloo.
    And you would reach C by 279 real AU from your launch point.
    So a lot further than Pluto as well.

  • @chrisgaming9567
    @chrisgaming9567 8 лет назад +1

    what music are you using?

  • @pigfish99
    @pigfish99 10 лет назад

    shit just got real.

  • @Wegnerrobert2
    @Wegnerrobert2 10 лет назад

    HOLY SHIT that landing

  • @thomad16
    @thomad16 10 лет назад

    They probably did think of it but didn't do it. Much like how video game gravity calculations don't take into effect the curvature of the earth. Or the Coriolis effect creating slight changes in velocity and heading.
    There are thousands of variables at play many of them have very little impact on NORMAL gameplay as such including them would add more stress on an already stressed out physics engine.

  • @xRaddicKx
    @xRaddicKx 8 лет назад

    I wounder what will happen if you'd enter the atmosphere of Kerbin at the light speed? :D Will it slow rapidly to 5k m/s like in this vid?

    • @MultiGoban
      @MultiGoban 8 лет назад +3

      +xRaddicKx would probably pass the planet before the game could even load anything XD

  • @Markus9705
    @Markus9705 9 лет назад

    We can't actually hit the atmosphere how at any speed in KSP since at a certain speed one frame would be a greater distance than the atmosphere.

  • @cd3d850
    @cd3d850 10 лет назад

    no because the devs probably didn't think of that

  • @Sartori
    @Sartori 9 лет назад

    What's the second piece in the soundtrack? Or is it all one?

    • @user-cu3qf1ud8k
      @user-cu3qf1ud8k 9 лет назад +1

      Kevin MacLeod - Five Armies

    • @Sartori
      @Sartori 9 лет назад

      Антон Захарченко
      Thanks :D

  • @xRaddicKx
    @xRaddicKx 8 лет назад +1

    Yes, this is super unrealistic but I love how the craft can easy survive the 100 m/s crash into the ground)))) IRL it would fucking explode like a bomb

    • @MultiGoban
      @MultiGoban 8 лет назад +1

      +xRaddicKx that's the most realistic part... 100 m/s is not that much. What about the reentry? XD at 160000 m/s lol

    • @The_DGO
      @The_DGO 8 лет назад

      +xRaddicKx in this case, the reentry would be more dangerous than hitting the ground, considering the g-force taken

  • @MrALMONUT
    @MrALMONUT 10 лет назад

    Damn dude I wonder if he turned to Kethane after that.

  • @Aaron-qe9ms
    @Aaron-qe9ms 10 лет назад

    hot damn.... =) cool!

  • @Victorious501
    @Victorious501 10 лет назад

    30000 Gs omg

  • @SwithinFeely
    @SwithinFeely 9 лет назад

    shudve used monopropellant engies

    • @Boemel
      @Boemel 9 лет назад

      this video is from 2013...

    • @SwithinFeely
      @SwithinFeely 9 лет назад

      Tom Jacobs oh
      ...
      lol :P