Excellent speech and the truth from start to finish. I can hardly believe that the West slept through 2008 and 2014. The "peace dividend" is over and it's time to show that we could fight for what we believe in and that we could win.
This is UK and USA plain always making EU countries afraid of Russia and sell weapons. Had USA and UK talk about peace with Russia no. EU countries must think this is UK and USA plain to sell weapons because they are good buyers
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here. If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine). And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s. Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression. Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine. Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship. Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies. These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial. The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do. Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia. The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law. If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever. The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
Disaster for EU is loosing cheap RU energy as we see it with economy going down! Disaster is leting US PRIVATE military industrial complex to earn BIG bucks while UA are dying! Disaster for EU is leting ISLAM to prevail!
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here. If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine). And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s. Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression. Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine. Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship. Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies. These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial. The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do. Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia. The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law. If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever. The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians-russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 ? It would be the same, as if someone would start helping to a man who attacked a group of people and killed many of them !! Russia decided to help to civilians in Donbas simply because those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
@@mirekslechta7161 So your explanation of everything is a concept of distance that is pre WWI? Now both USA and RUSSIA are less than hours away from each other with nuclear weapons. Under the seain various points of the seas from the Arctic to the South Pacific and South Atlantic military forces are within minutes from either side. Time to update your era.
@@user-tk1ih4zr2s Aren’t you from one of those fly over States? When the missiles fly the destruction will be at the enfs level f the flights… middle is just leftover.
Europe absolutely needs to step up, as America stumbles. Otherwise, If Ukraine should fall, then European security will be undermined for the next hundred years.
NATO can deter Russia by ensuring all logistics if defense are right to the front line in Ukraine for the win! Only when Russia realizes it cannot keep using force above or under the table will you have real deterrence!
Did you listen? There is no complaint about Americas response to a European conflict. He's right! The European response per their place on the map is lack luster. Over all, the farther you are from bordering Russia, the less the needed response, also the less sense of emergency. Americas response is respectable to say the least. The countries closer or bordering Russia are the best example of what the response should have been, and should be. It's costing the other Euro countries much more money and they are less effective. That was a very pure assessment.
Thank you, Dr Michta, for speaking up. As a European, I’ve always felt that our countries on the Old Continent spend way too little on their military and leave their own security in the hands of the United States. NATO is more needed now than at any other time in its history but it ought to be a much more balanced alliance, with the Europeans paying their fair share.
It was the Canadiens and the Americans that had to go over and save Europe twice time for the European man to step up and start fighting their own wars
Valery Zaluzhnyi former commander of the Ukrainian army: "I personally believe that the reason for what is happening in Ukraine today is the logical consequences of the reluctance of a collective measure, which first of all declares its democratic values, these are the logical consequences of the reluctance of a collective measure to influence the global security system..." Video: In conversation with Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukrainian Ambassador to the UK in Chattam House
What the hell are you talking about. Did you listen? There is no complaint about Americas response to a European conflict. He's right! The European response per their place on the map is lack luster. Over all, the farther you are from bordering Russia, the less the needed response, also the less sense of emergency. Harris has no experience at anything. If she wins she has no choice but to follow the Biden example, which is respectable to say the least. The countries closer or bordering Russia are the best example of what the response should have been, and should be. It's costing the other Euro countries much more money and they are less effective. That was a very pure assessment.
There are 650 million Europeans and 143 million Russians. It is time for Europeans to put their hand in their pocket and fund NATO at the correct level.
@@frankrenda2519NOT true. Every country that has had to deal with Russian aggression is prepared to defend their homeland. Orban, the exception, models himself on Putin, and wants to rule for life.
Why has the front line barely moved since the beginning of the war? Why are the Russians leaving Ukraine to NATO as a deployment area? NATO would first have to occupy Belarus to clear its back.
Totalmente de acuerdo… vivimos muy bien en el Oeste pensando que a nosotros nada nos puede pasar. Recientemente atravesamos una pandemia en la que no solo murieron personas del tercer mundo, catástrofes naturales y ahora pensamos que las guerras solo caen en África o medio oriente. Desde luego los occidentales necesitamos menos ladrar en congresos y más actuar. La paz duradera consiste en ser pacífico con los demás y hacerse respetar !!
This whiner forgot to say that NATO's total military budget exceeds Russia's military budget by about 16-18 full times. And that's why NATO is concerned that Russia's military budget is 18 times smaller, which is why Russia is terrifyingly scary. The whiner also forgot to report how many countries NATO has bombed in the last 50 years. The fingers of two hands are not enough to count.
How many of these countries that were being bombed by Nato, were anexed / occupied robbed , kidnaped children, on occupied teritories , schools and everything is switched to Nato language. Stolen toilets. Women and children raped. Has Iraq become a state of US ? after invasion or Libya? Or Serbia ? What is your IQ ? , can I ask?
So why are we not listening to all these people ? Our leaders in NATO might be spending more but it's not letting Ukraine fight for it life and right to live in freedom. Show Russia the alliance is strong . C'mon Leaders of the world step up this could've been stopped many times over. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here. If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine). And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s. Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression. Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine. Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship. Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies. These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial. The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do. Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia. The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law. If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever. The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
If it is that bad for you move to Russia, North Korea or any other country run by oligarchs,dictators…..better still hope dotard trump wins as president .You will get what you want..
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here. If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine). And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s. Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression. Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine. Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship. Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies. These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial. The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do. Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia. The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law. If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever. The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians-russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 ? It would be the same, as if someone would start helping to a man who attacked a group of people and killed many of them !! Russia decided to help to civilians in Donbas simply because those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
When NATO must step up? When NATO can confirm that Russia would not be able to use Nuke in war. Or if they use then NATO has the ability to disable/destroy/stop it. Think about defense first before you attack.
WHAT??, In 2008 there should have been NO suggestion of Ukraine or Georgia joining NATO. NATO should have been abandoned as obsolete in 1999 in Seattle "50 years is enough!!"
Totalmente de acuerdo… vivimos muy bien en el Oeste pensando que a nosotros nada nos puede pasar. Recientemente atravesamos una pandemia en la que no solo murieron personas del tercer mundo, catástrofes naturales y ahora pensamos que las guerras solo caen en África o medio oriente. Desde luego los occidentales necesitamos menos ladrar en congresos y más actuar. La paz duradera consiste en ser pacífico con los demás y hacerse respetar !! 55 países - sino más- contra 1 y consentimos que dos indecentes nos metan guantazos en la cara!!!
They certainly embarrassed themselves in Ukraine initially but that doesn't mean that they're incapable of building themselves back up, which is why it's important for NATO to stay vigilant and continue to invest even more in their militaries to deter Russia since military might is all that gets through their thick orcish skulls It's all they'll ever recognize or respect
Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians-russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 ? It would be the same, as if someone would start helping to a man who attacked a group of people and killed many of them !! Russia decided to help to civilians in Donbas simply because those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
Who is waring in the middle east The US.who keeps wars going in Africa old colonials to keep control of resource, thats you in Europe by the way ,get it.
Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians-russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 ? It would be the same, as if someone would start helping to a man who attacked a group of people and killed many of them !! Russia decided to help to civilians in Donbas simply because those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here. If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine). And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s. Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression. Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine. Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship. Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies. These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial. The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do. Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia. The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law. If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever. The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
I recently sold half my tech stock holdings due to all-time highs, leaving me with $400k. Should I invest in ETFs now or wait for a market correction considering potential inflation?
From $37K to $45K that's the minimum range of profit return every week I thinks it's not a bad one for me, now I have enough to pay bills and take care of my family.
Well, possibly once Ruzzia accepts being ruled by law, transfoms into an actual democracy, & gets rid of it's ideas of controlling the nations around it's borders.. & perhaps decolonizes it own territories aswell.. Then there might be grounds for a discussion on the subject.. Keep in mind, it would have to convince ALL of NATO's members at that time, of inviting it in.. that would require building up a fair bit of trust... So, it's probably a possibility, but at this point, I think it would require at least 50 years of radical & continus societal change in Ruzzia to get there..🧐
@@leeanderironside1898yea he did . That’s when he was fully sure what NATO’s true intentions are. Just to keep things in perspective: NATO is composed of fascists and nazis . Germany joined NATO not even 6 years had passed of the end of 2nd world war!. Draw your conclusions now !. Morone
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here. If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine). And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s. Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression. Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine. Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship. Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies. These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial. The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do. Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia. The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law. If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever. The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
Excellent speech and the truth from start to finish. I can hardly believe that the West slept through 2008 and 2014.
The "peace dividend" is over and it's time to show that we could fight for what we believe in and that we could win.
He so right about everything. This could be a disaster for Europe, if our politicians dont wake up soon.
Report War Crimes and Espionage: Axis of Evil /Communist MAGA: Cease and desist malicious use of AI, energy weapons, satellites
soon)) it is already late
This is UK and USA plain always making EU countries afraid of Russia and sell weapons. Had USA and UK talk about peace with Russia no. EU countries must think this is UK and USA plain to sell weapons because they are good buyers
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here.
If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine).
And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s.
Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression.
Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine.
Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship.
Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies.
These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial.
The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do.
Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia.
The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law.
If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever.
The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
Disaster for EU is loosing cheap RU energy as we see it with economy going down!
Disaster is leting US PRIVATE military industrial complex to earn BIG bucks while UA are dying!
Disaster for EU is leting ISLAM to prevail!
NATO: "We will do everything we can to avoid escalation!"
Putin: "Umm...OK...thanks for letting me know."
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here.
If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine).
And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s.
Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression.
Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine.
Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship.
Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies.
These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial.
The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do.
Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia.
The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law.
If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever.
The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
Ask the baltic countries why they did join NATO.
NATO❤️
All the right observations and calls to action that should have been voiced long ago, but can still be acted upon.
Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians-russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 ? It would be the same, as if someone would start helping to a man who attacked a group of people and killed many of them !! Russia decided to help to civilians in Donbas simply because those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
@@mirekslechta7161
So your explanation of everything is a concept of distance that is pre WWI? Now both USA and RUSSIA are less than hours away from each other with nuclear weapons. Under the seain various points of the seas from the Arctic to the South Pacific and South Atlantic military forces are within minutes from either side. Time to update your era.
@@hiltonwatkins6750 What about land forces like those in Ukraine.
@@user-tk1ih4zr2s Aren’t you from one of those fly over States? When the missiles fly the destruction will be at the enfs level f the flights… middle is just leftover.
You go first. We are right behind you.
Keep joking
Europe absolutely needs to step up, as America stumbles. Otherwise, If Ukraine should fall, then European security will be undermined for the next hundred years.
Absolutely.
NATO can deter Russia by ensuring all logistics if defense are right to the front line in Ukraine for the win! Only when Russia realizes it cannot keep using force above or under the table will you have real deterrence!
NATO and Ukraine started this bastard war you melt!
NATO direct participation -> WW3. China will support Russia. Do you think you stand a chance of surviving this? Are you out of your mind?
How many countries has RU and how many countries has US led coaliton attacked / invaded last 20yr!?
Russia is NATO s biggest slap ever 🤕
😂😂😂😂😂 your ignorance Knows No bounds. 😂😂😂😂😂
Im sick and tired of this BS comming from overpaid papermovers with ideologic blenders.
Wake the f up nato
Wake up to what ,NATO is lost when it comes to Russia , absolutely nothing ur NATO can do , Russia's ur boss period 🤔
Excellent reporting!!!
Did you listen? There is no complaint about Americas response to a European conflict. He's right! The European response per their place on the map is lack luster. Over all, the farther you are from bordering Russia, the less the needed response, also the less sense of emergency. Americas response is respectable to say the least. The countries closer or bordering Russia are the best example of what the response should have been, and should be. It's costing the other Euro countries much more money and they are less effective. That was a very pure assessment.
Thank you, Dr Michta, for speaking up. As a European, I’ve always felt that our countries on the Old Continent spend way too little on their military and leave their own security in the hands of the United States. NATO is more needed now than at any other time in its history but it ought to be a much more balanced alliance, with the Europeans paying their fair share.
It was the Canadiens and the Americans that had to go over and save Europe twice time for the European man to step up and start fighting their own wars
Valery Zaluzhnyi former commander of the Ukrainian army: "I personally believe that the reason for what is happening in Ukraine today is the logical consequences of the reluctance of a collective measure, which first of all declares its democratic values, these are the logical consequences of the reluctance of a collective measure to influence the global security system..." Video: In conversation with Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Ukrainian Ambassador to the UK in Chattam House
Lets hope Kamala Harris have more courage than Joe Biden
Lets hope you have an Atomic shelter , because Kamala has one.
Any hope for more brain?😊
You are as MORONIC As that brainless slapper.
I don't want Trump he will f@ck up the economy and then prices will go up
What the hell are you talking about. Did you listen? There is no complaint about Americas response to a European conflict. He's right! The European response per their place on the map is lack luster. Over all, the farther you are from bordering Russia, the less the needed response, also the less sense of emergency. Harris has no experience at anything. If she wins she has no choice but to follow the Biden example, which is respectable to say the least. The countries closer or bordering Russia are the best example of what the response should have been, and should be. It's costing the other Euro countries much more money and they are less effective. That was a very pure assessment.
The Defense Sector is a rough roll in humanity. 👁️
There are 650 million Europeans and 143 million Russians.
It is time for Europeans to put their hand in their pocket and fund NATO at the correct level.
Also there are 2 billion of Chinese. Or do you think China will not gladly support Russia?
to bad most of those nato countries that are slavic population would never fight russia
@@frankrenda2519NOT true. Every country that has had to deal with Russian aggression is prepared to defend their homeland. Orban, the exception, models himself on Putin, and wants to rule for life.
Report War Crimes and Espionage: Axis of Evil /Communist MAGA: Cease and desist malicious use of AI, energy weapons, satellites
@@frankrenda2519 Ukraine doing a good job so far. Poland is rolling its sleeves up. Hold my beer.
Small wonder that there were so many empty seats which reflects the speakers' crania.
Why has the front line barely moved since the beginning of the war? Why are the Russians leaving Ukraine to NATO as a deployment area?
NATO would first have to occupy Belarus to clear its back.
and there’s no one around there No wonder why
Totalmente de acuerdo… vivimos muy bien en el Oeste pensando que a nosotros nada nos puede pasar. Recientemente atravesamos una pandemia en la que no solo murieron personas del tercer mundo, catástrofes naturales y ahora pensamos que las guerras solo caen en África o medio oriente.
Desde luego los occidentales necesitamos menos ladrar en congresos y más actuar. La paz duradera consiste en ser pacífico con los demás y hacerse respetar !!
This whiner forgot to say that NATO's total military budget exceeds Russia's military budget by about 16-18 full times. And that's why NATO is concerned that Russia's military budget is 18 times smaller, which is why Russia is terrifyingly scary. The whiner also forgot to report how many countries NATO has bombed in the last 50 years. The fingers of two hands are not enough to count.
How many of these countries that were being bombed by Nato, were anexed / occupied robbed , kidnaped children, on occupied teritories , schools and everything is switched to Nato language. Stolen toilets. Women and children raped.
Has Iraq become a state of US ? after invasion or Libya? Or Serbia ? What is your IQ ? , can I ask?
Spend trillions every year on military, meanwhile infrastructure, economy, healthcare is collapsing. Keep it up👍
So why are we not listening to all these people ? Our leaders in NATO might be spending more but it's not letting Ukraine fight for it life and right to live in freedom. Show Russia the alliance is strong . C'mon Leaders of the world step up this could've been stopped many times over. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here.
If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine).
And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s.
Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression.
Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine.
Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship.
Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies.
These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial.
The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do.
Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia.
The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law.
If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever.
The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
If it is that bad for you move to Russia, North Korea or any other country run by oligarchs,dictators…..better still hope dotard trump wins as president .You will get what you want..
“We are the Borg. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.”
Nuclear seems to be a non issue
Until one side starts losing really badly.
Sleepy Nato wake up asap plss..take action now!
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here.
If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine).
And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s.
Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression.
Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine.
Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship.
Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies.
These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial.
The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do.
Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia.
The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law.
If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever.
The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians-russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 ? It would be the same, as if someone would start helping to a man who attacked a group of people and killed many of them !! Russia decided to help to civilians in Donbas simply because those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
Let's talk about honest. Wow! Now let's talk about correct. Well, that was covered too. Wow!!
Shared on Mastodon ClimateJustice by JdeB 🇳🇱
They aren’t putting us in the meet grinder too. Talks and Diplomacy only, please!
When NATO must step up? When NATO can confirm that Russia would not be able to use Nuke in war. Or if they use then NATO has the ability to disable/destroy/stop it. Think about defense first before you attack.
You cannot disable Nuclear you cannot stop its Ukraine should not join nato and war will be over simple . If war countinue it will only escalate
three years....
Where is the escalate button on this? 🙄
When 2 countries fight you can guarantee the USA has visited one or both of them.
WHAT??, In 2008 there should have been NO suggestion of Ukraine or Georgia joining NATO. NATO should have been abandoned as obsolete in 1999 in Seattle "50 years is enough!!"
Look into it 1991, all down to the Clinton admin..
Uhm, because NATO is a nice hustle. And EU is not 100% owned by Blackrock ...yet.
The gentleman is right,
almost 1000days into the invasion of ruzzia,
but, nevertheless, right.
Mas Joe Biden não falava que a Rússia era só um posto de gasolina com armas nucleares.
Putin doesn't seem to concerned with his citizens lives.
Were you or US leaders concerned with the 58,000 american soldiers lost in Vietnam? America lacks HONESTY!
Totalmente de acuerdo… vivimos muy bien en el Oeste pensando que a nosotros nada nos puede pasar. Recientemente atravesamos una pandemia en la que no solo murieron personas del tercer mundo, catástrofes naturales y ahora pensamos que las guerras solo caen en África o medio oriente.
Desde luego los occidentales necesitamos menos ladrar en congresos y más actuar. La paz duradera consiste en ser pacífico con los demás y hacerse respetar !! 55 países - sino más- contra 1 y consentimos que dos indecentes nos metan guantazos en la cara!!!
If Russia can deploy N. Korean troops, Ukraine can invite anyone they like.
Moron , NATO personal have been in Ukraine from the beginning. 😂😂😂😂😂
@jimbehan478 frightening how I'll informed people are.
@@jimbehan478 fake news. Some countries have had advisors there, but they were not sent by NATO command
@@jimbehan478 troll, there are no NATO-assigned troops there, just advisors from individual countries.
@@tomlane8826 🤣🤣🤣🤣
NATO did step up. They still lost.
Now you say Russia is strong and Europe is weak???? Before you said Russia is weak and fight with shovels and washing machines . ?????
They certainly embarrassed themselves in Ukraine initially but that doesn't mean that they're incapable of building themselves back up, which is why it's important for NATO to stay vigilant and continue to invest even more in their militaries to deter Russia since military might is all that gets through their thick orcish skulls
It's all they'll ever recognize or respect
three years....
Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians-russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 ? It would be the same, as if someone would start helping to a man who attacked a group of people and killed many of them !! Russia decided to help to civilians in Donbas simply because those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
@@mirekslechta7161lies.
dot.
every word a lie!
I DON'T NEED WORDS!!!!!!!!!!!!
So in short Nato needs to stop the meekness & grow some Balls. Or you will be pickd of one by one politically or militarily.
Who is waring in the middle east The US.who keeps wars going in Africa old colonials to keep control of resource, thats you in Europe by the way ,get it.
Nato is only SHOWING WEAKNESS and i am fed off y it cause people are dying because of these soft balls games
its not a country can spend 10% on defense, 10% should BE the number.
Who wants to be helping to a country(Ukraine) which kept killing civilians-russian language speakers in Donbas since 2014 ? It would be the same, as if someone would start helping to a man who attacked a group of people and killed many of them !! Russia decided to help to civilians in Donbas simply because those civilians were killed by thousands since 2014. About Ukraine war I say it like this: Would USA like Russia´s army in Mexico or Cuba? If your answer was NO while you did not mind NATO(it means USA´s army) near Russia, than something was very wrong with your reasoning, period.
Circus.
Oh do not worry, sleep calm while Russia is developing military power with Chinese money.
When it comes it will be too late
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here.
If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine).
And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s.
Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression.
Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine.
Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship.
Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies.
These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial.
The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do.
Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia.
The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law.
If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever.
The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
Fool.😂😂😂😂
The US have the largest military, 805 military bases globally, so who's boot are you under.
Don't work for money; make money work for you. Invest wisely today to create the freedom you desire tomorrow.
Many new tra-ders face challenges without proper guidance. I found success by learning from James Clark's expertise.
@@RobsonSilva-cs2heexactly that's why I always seek Mr J Clark's guidance in all I do 😊
I recently sold half my tech stock holdings due to all-time highs, leaving me with $400k. Should I invest in ETFs now or wait for a market correction considering potential inflation?
Celebrating a $30k stock portfolio today from a $6k start. Investing wisely has given me time for family and future plans.
From $37K to $45K that's the minimum range of profit return every week I thinks it's not a bad one for me, now I have enough to pay bills and take care of my family.
Listen carefully do some research not from resent internet nonsence. There is alot of nato manipulative talk here.
😂 how the f would nato step up?? Haha what a fkn joke
Bs and again bs.You already lost
Will NATO welcome Russia to join? It will make nato stronger
President Putin applied to Joplin NATO years ago !!!! Was refused ……. Draw your own conclusions !
Well, possibly once Ruzzia accepts being ruled by law, transfoms into an actual democracy, & gets rid of it's ideas of controlling the nations around it's borders.. & perhaps decolonizes it own territories aswell.. Then there might be grounds for a discussion on the subject.. Keep in mind, it would have to convince ALL of NATO's members at that time, of inviting it in.. that would require building up a fair bit of trust... So, it's probably a possibility, but at this point, I think it would require at least 50 years of radical & continus societal change in Ruzzia to get there..🧐
lol.... u nuts ?
@@howardhan2101 president Putin requested to join NATO years ago but was rejected , draw your own conclusions !
@@leeanderironside1898yea he did . That’s when he was fully sure what NATO’s true intentions are. Just to keep things in perspective: NATO is composed of fascists and nazis . Germany joined NATO not even 6 years had passed of the end of 2nd world war!. Draw your conclusions now !. Morone
If I become President of Russia today, tomorrow Ukrainians will start remembering Putin as Vladimir the Kind.😊
FULL HOUSE 🏡
🫣🫡
right!
Michta is an ideologue. NATO is the aggressor here.
If every nation in Latin America (including Mexico) had chosen to join a Russian or Chinese-led military alliance & Mexico was not just politically manipulated by Russia or China, but it was killing Americans in, say, North Mexico, the US would certainly invade Mexico (analogue to Ukraine).
And it would be seen as far more justified and defensive than the US/NATO invasions of Iraq or Afghanistan in the early 2000s.
Then you could have a Russian or Chinese ideologue like Michta claiming that weapons & troops need to be sent to Mexico to protect against US aggression.
Big powers have their sphere of influence & don’t want other military powers thousands of miles away to challenge them right on their border. In the case of the United States, it’s called the Monroe doctrine.
Michta also embraces the silly ideology that it’s democracy against dictatorship.
Western nations like the US are actually plutocracies, not democracies.
These plutocracies may have some minor internal democratic forms but they are fundamentally run by elites, and their neocolonial, imperial foreign policy is utterly dictatorial.
The US has 900 military bases around the world, *dictating* to other nations under threat of violence (as well as crippling sanctions) what they should do.
Furthermore, the US/NATO has a worse record of aggression in the post WW2 era than Russia.
The US/NATO have shown total disregard for the UN charter and international law.
If there’s a good thing that will come out of the US/western-supported genocide in Gaza is the realization that the goals of the US led order are purely based on power and greed- with no ethical component whatsoever.
The corporate media’s whitewashing of crimes committed by the Western order will become even more apparent, and the self-serving delusions of the self righteous monsters ruling the western order will become even more exposed.
You have no balls
You fight with your brain not your ball's
Most european countries correctly don’t consider Russia to be a threat to them.