Sarah Boone Argues with Judge: 'I Don't Want to be Pro Se'
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- Accused killer #SarahBoone argued with a judge over access to evidence and whether she had a right to standby counsel at a hearing on Monday. Boone is currently representing herself at trial in the death of her boyfriend, Jorge Torres.
#CourtTV - What do YOU think?
Watch 24/7 Court TV LIVE Stream Today www.courttv.com/
Join the Investigation Newsletter www.courttv.co...
Court TV Podcast www.courttv.co...
Join the Court TV Community to get access to perks:
/ @courttv
FOLLOW THE CASE:
Facebook / courttv
Twitter/X / courttv
Instagram / courttvnetwork
TikTok / courttvlive
RUclips / courttv
WATCH +140 FREE TRIALS IN THE COURT TV ARCHIVE
www.courttv.co...
HOW TO FIND COURT TV
www.courttv.co...
#CourtTV - What do YOU think?
@@COURTTV I think Brooks 2.0 🍿
this is gonna be funny watching sarah watching the jurors watching the video of her watching jorge all zipped up
She just wanted to be part of her own defense. Most people don't understand that a lawyers don't include their client in the defense process. She has a legal right to be represented and a legal right to aid in her own defense. By denying her these right, no matter how difficult she is are grounds for appeal.
@@readingwithnan988she doesn’t have a right to an infinite supply of court-appointed attorneys that she keeps rejecting. This case should have gone to trial years ago if it were not for her trying on and discarding attorneys like dirty underwear.
Insufferable..... she doesn't get it does she. Her self entitled manipulative approach she has undoubtedly used most of her life, her refusal to accept accountability or consequences for her own actions, will not work here, certainly not with this Judge.
He is going out of his way to accommodate her. Even though I can feel his exasperation through the screen, as much patience as he is showing . Her "plan" to delay this trial by forcing out public defenders and one privately hired attorney one by one,has backfired and it's no one's fault or problem that she never went " pro se" before
She should have thought of how difficult or even possible to create a defense as an inmate being charged with 2nd degree murder. She abused her rights and these are the consequences.
Period end of story.
The kicker is little to nothing is really going to matter once the evidence is produced at this trial.
It is 99% clear if she had standby counsel she would soon be back in court asking for different standby counsel.
Yes, she asked for “effective” standby counsel. No one is going to effective by her standards.
Standby counsel is not there to carry out paperwork on the defendant's behalf, it's there so that the trial may proceed smoothly. She was going to complain as soon as the lawyer refused to carry out her first instruction.
I'm surprised she's not caused her detective to have a nervous breakdown yet.
The boyfriend didn't have a prayer....drinking...or not...we see how she is sober....😮....imo
Let her twist in the wind a bit longer.
That murderer acts as if she thinks she’s on the same professional level as the judge. She’s delusional.
Shes actually not mentally ill. She's a narcissistic drunk who's been getting away with her unruly behaviors for years. Now she's being told NO while she's sober, she's not liking it. Luv that 4 her 🤣🤣
I agree. So arrogant!! That feeling is huge problem in the world. Like student thinking they are equal to the teacher or criminals to the copes. People box themselves in and have no room to learn and improve when they have that delusional arrogance .
I find it so fascinating in a benign evil/narcissistic implosion sense.
I never would have believed it would be 4 and a half years and she'd represent herself. Absolute disaster. Right lawyer and a proper plea she'd be out in a few more years if not already out
Absolutely!
She was a drunk prior to this, jobless, BUT BUT BUT she was a straight A student decades prior to that guys 😂
This woman truly is insufferable
This is the best word to describe her I think. I've also read that over and over from several other comments 😂 the word most used.
@@jennyjenga1929 I hate for the word to be redundant but there’s no other way to describe her and worst of all it barely does it justice!
@@jennyjenga1929 it’s unreal
lol I said the same comment OP said on another video and got over 500 likes haha she really is totally delusional and insufferable and deserves to spend the rest of her days behind bars
This woman is in her own version of reality, that poor man pleaded for his life and she tormented him to death, it's absolutely sickening
I don't wanna be pro se either, that's why i'm not out there criming.
Hahahaha
But if for some wild reason you did find yourself in trouble you'd be smart enough to have an attorney & not abuse them like this one has.
😂😂❤
Or putting people in a suitcase
@@tammy389 I have done all the crimes and have gone pro se every time and the judge went wow you're so good at both, first prize, and then I came here, to the RUclips comments, and TOTALLY OWNED YOU
sincerely,
A master criminal who gets away with everything
Extremely patient judge.
Unfortunately, that’s how this horrid society has made people become. It’s very very disgusting
When i play hide and seek i always hide the person before i start looking for them.
It only works when you're so drunk that you would forget where you put him after a couple of minutes. But he just didn't shut up so it was a prolonged process and she fell asleep. Makes sense 😂
😂
@@Jag...they only had 2 bottles of wine. It was in the police interrogation. She's always blamed alcohol for her behavior. But it's who. She is. Nothing to do with alcohol .
@@judithwilliams3147 You do know that all the comments in this thread is JOKES right? Sara claimed they shared ONE bottle of wine in her first encounter with PD. Doesn't mean it's true.
Seriously like that never made sense to me !
She’s too busy pushing back instead of moving ahead. She plays ignorant with answers she doesn’t like. That’s why she’s bogged down at a standstill.
Exactly
I was thinking - if I was her, I would've stopped talking and gotten back to the jail to start going through those documents!! She doesn't have long to review them all!
@@thisisanaussiegal3590 well, she’s had 4 years to come up with excuses for all the evidence against her. After all, who knows it better than her?
Oh No , She's not playing ignorant at all , She totally is but after 8 attorneys and a few jailhouse layers She knows a couple of questions to ask but Nope , Sarah would be only pretending to be smart .
@@lucanolallo1776 oooh damn. I like that first sentence. Sums up a lot of ppl I’ve known. Even myself at once point. Thanks for phrasing it like that. Made some things “click” for me 🙂
Step 1: Show Interrogation video
Step 2: Show her home video
Step 3: Sentencing.
That’s pretty much it.
Yes, but make it a little fun. Her ex husband is on the state's witness list. Now that she's Pro Se, let her question him on the stand, so he can look her in the eye and tell her what a POS of a wife and mother she was, and how she got violent, was a blackout drunk, cheated on him, and did nothing but mooch off him.
She is basically "I understand that but you didn't agree with me therefore you're wrong and all this is unfair". I can just imagine she was the same way with all her lawyers.
Have you noticed whenever she doesn't like a finding she always goes to I don't understand or explain it to me again, it's like an adult trying to get their way like a toddler does and thinking it will make people capitulate to her wants. Even if she were an experienced defense attorney she would suck as a good attorney comes with plan a plan b and so on. She also argues over some of the opinions that really aren't helpful. When she talks about some of the arrests she drives the point of how she wasn't charged. Yes that is important but not in these types of hearings. She should learn how to defend those things in a trial.
The judge was very careful in explaining the reasons she lost council. An appellate court will look at everything. Of course she’s not qualified to be an attorney. But she caused this.
Her refusing to talk to last attorney and just walking out
Of room, will show any appellant judge what she was up to.
Assuming she gets an appeal trial, she still has to establish reasonable doubt that she intentionally left him in a suitcase.
@doom4067 ?
She clearly stated she did not want to represent herself. Could be grounds for an appeal? Wondering if the judge overstepped here. Perhaps she could show an appelate court she had good reasons for having fired her attorneys. Court appointed attorneys are never top notch anyway.
It would be hard to listen to that little girl voice throughout the trial, please get her a lawyer. I suspect there might be some mental health issues here too.
@@nimue4325 you _suspect_ there _might_ be?
@@nimue4325She had a private attorney first, and public defenders came after. They all requested release.
Stalling the trial by going through any and all counsel is likely her goal at this point. Jail is much more comfortable than prison.
Now to represent herself, and she doesn’t like her “attorney “
Maybe she will file a motion stating her attorney is a buffoon, like she did to her prior attorney 😂
the FEMALE , Derrell Brooks. she only wants to delay
His soulmate lol 😂
Absolutely, but like Brooks, she’ll soon be behind bars👏
This SO CLEARLY shows what is WRONG with our Judicial System! To let this woman WASTE the courts TIME, OVER AND OVER AGAIN and entertain her insanity is sickening.
Bullseye! 🎯 I made this same comment. It is disgusting to watch her drone on and on and on ad nauseum, and then to listen to the Judge ask her if she had any more questions, when clearly she had already emptied her head. She is reveling in the attention she is being shown and is loving every minute of it.
@@tamararutland-mills9530 when someone is pro se they get a lot of latitude. This is just the beginning…..
So basically you're saying it's human rights that's wrong with your judicial system.
@@dsab381 Thank you. People seem to have little understanding of why the judicial system works the way it does, and why it's important that it works the same way for everyone no matter how annoying they are.
@@15leslied Oh yeah, we learned that by watching the Darrell Brooks trial, lol! Judge Dorow deserves a purple heart for enduring his antics!
She CLEARLY video'd herself refusing HELP to her boyfriend. It's the smoking gun... she isn't that smart
But it wAsNt InTeNtIoNaL 🥴🥴🥴
Nope, she's arrogant and narcissistic.
If it weren't for that video, they probably would have gone for more of a manslaughter charge
Haint that smart
You don’t know her !
She’s a Former straight A student who excels at everything!
Once the Trial begins Sarah is going to attempt to force a mistrial…
She’ll blurt out things in front of the jury..” They won’t even allow me an attorney “ ..
Blah, Blah, Blah…This trial is going to be a mess
You’re right, I can’t wait 😂😂
She is hell bent on pissing everyone off. She is accusing lawyers of lying and questioning the judge. I feel for this judge who repeats directives but she is too hard headed to comprehend.
Sarah gets a high , endorphin rush, when she deliberately causes problems for others
@@byBeauxARTFULIVING Textbook Narc
U guys/gals are spot on! Plays the victim & knows exactly what’s she’s doing. She probably has some evidence & knowledge from her first 8 layers filings? This is going to another drawn out train wreck! Can’t wait to watch!
He is the perfect judge for her. Friendly but firm. Sarah cannot delay her trial anymore.
She has all of them zipped up in a suitcase.
All of the things she’s bellyaching about would be a moot point had she accepted any of her PREVIOUS COMPETENT COUNCIL. Boone: You are your own attorney. Start googling how to do the job of a lawyer who has been properly schooled. This is ALL ON YOU, from the initial murder to the situation you now find yourself in. ALL YOUR FAULT due to your conceited self-inflated ego. YOU, YOU, YOU. You like things to be all about YOU … well here YOU go.
The only problem I have with the state is that JACS just now offered the pro se packet.
It should be a breeze for her to represent herself considering “she excels at everything”!!🤣🤡
Watching her go back and forth with his honor today was excruciating. I cannot even fathom having to be sitting there in front of her listening to her repeat the same question over and over again, taking notes that seem to go nowhere. She's like a character straight out of "The Phantom Tollbooth"...😮
Where Rhyme and Reason have been banished? Very true. The defendant makes a solid Humbug.
Rip Jorge Torres, this woman is a monster. I can't watch the video. She is so cruel. Guilty as charge. Hopefully the Jury will find this demon accountable in 2 hours .
She had a bunch of highly experienced attorneys.
Who didn't want her to be included in her own defense. Which is her constitutional right. They are accustomed to half azing their job and getting away it. She will have grounds for an appeal. Because she's been denied both her right to participate in her defense and now her right to council.
That is ridiculous. She wants her lawyers to bend to her every want and need and thats not how lawyers work. When 8 lawyers have been dropped, theres no way they've all been bad or wrong. Common denominator and all that. @readingwithnan988
@@readingwithnan988 you don’t understand what assisting in your own defense means. It doesn’t mean what you or Sarah think it means, in fact she was actively not assisting in her own defense when she left meetings and refused to focus on the legal issues. Now she is representing herself which is also a constitutional right.
@@readingwithnan988 Thank you for saying it! Her lawyers DID half-ass it.
@@0795920s because she doesn’t want to go over the evidence with them. She wants them to close their eyes and pretend the evidence doesn’t exist.
Spoiler alert:
Her boyfriend got the suit case and she got the court case. A long court case that should have been zipped up long ago😳
hahaha, very true
She needs to be made to stop this nonsense and get on with this trial .... no attorney can work with her ....
Yeah, that's been established.
Idk why all these lawyers are shocked. If Sarah gets another lawyer this is going to keep going on and on forever. The judge has had it with her. I'm surprised he didn't allow standby counsel HOWEVER Sarah thinks standby counsel is co-counsel and will try to abuse them as such. So it makes sense to me.
Yeah they keep on saying why they think she will end up with standby counsel, but they told her today that she doesn’t qualify for standby counsel because she’s not *VOLUNTARILY* representing herself. This judge is SERIOUS and hasn’t overturned anything he has said, so unless it’s an appellate issue, he’s making her proceed solo.
@@JadeMack7I wonder if the judge should have made these things crystal clear before appointing her her last and final lawyer. “This is your last state appointed lawyer. If you have issue with this lawyer, you will be representing yourself. If that happens, you are not entitled to stand by counsel”. I’m just thinking in terms of appeal, if that will be an issue. I don’t know. I guess he knows what he’s doing. This is one crazy ride. I thought the Karen Reed trial was a circus. This will be ridiculous.
@@My-22-Cents oh yeah she was absolutely told that she’s not getting another lawyer when Cashman was appointed because Cashman is apparently a big shot that has tried many “difficult” murder cases and would be more than competent (and responsive, which was SB’s problem with #7). SB agreed that she would make it work. After Cashman said that she spent more than 20 hours with SB, answered collect phone calls on her own dime, and Boone still had the audacity to walk out of their meetings and say that Cashman wasn’t being “nice” to her, I knew at that point she was beyond cooked because this is a new judge that would have surely read up on the case and would have clearly had the very last warning to SB at the forefront of his mind. And honestly they also probably ran out of Public Defenders in their area lol, but there is a very clear paper trail of all of SB’s warnings that she would end up representing herself, and I have to think this judge covered himself and sought out guidance from as high up as possible before making this well thought out decision. I’m actually surprised at how strict he is being in keeping to his rulings, but I’ve watched all the hearings and heard both judges clearly warn her… she called their bluff and he doubled down. Probably the first time in life she hasn’t been able to manipulate her way out of something.
@@JadeMack7 thanks for the reply. Thats good to know. I only watched a few of the hearings and then just recaps for majority, so that’s good to know she got proper warning. I just know come appeal, she will try everything, so was wondering how clear this had been explained to her. She’s definitely got a slap in the face this time round. Thanks for the info.
At the end of the last Cashman hearing, Sarah's grin on the way out said that she thought her tactic was still working.
the 911 call and her callous calmness as she announces 'my bf is dead' proves that she had intended to unalive him
Then she screams at 911 to hurry up yet she first called her ex husband who told her to call 911, guess she wasn't in that much of a hurry
@@NoAmm15 exactly
“My boyfriend is dead”
She just doesn’t care
Also
“I put him in a suitcase”
How does that mean she doesn’t care? You have to be clear with 911 operators. I highly doubt she could put him in a suitcase without his willful participation.
@@Be1New2You3 She could have if she pushed him down the stairs first.
Today in the hearing she was told EXACTLY why she doesn’t qualify for standby counsel, so it’s kind of annoying that they keep bringing up that she will get standby counsel when she was told today in no uncertain terms that she won’t get one.
Timestamp: 28:37
I was shocked they kept saying that as well. Glad you noticed, too!
She’s not as smart as she thinks she is. She honestly couldn’t understand the simplest instructions. The judge had to repeat things several times.
What do you mean? She excels at everything she does. Remember? 😂😂
She understands it, but it's a manipulation tactic to ask the same question repeatedly in an effort to get a different answer.
She's enjoying the attention
She knows that after she's gound guilty that no one will care that she's licked up. Her son has been under the custody of his father ever since the divorce. He will be better off forgetting all about his mother the suitcase murderer. 😠
Yep she said she has fans 😂
Take a few minutes ... and imagine dying in the position/situation the victim was in. I had to snap myself out of imagining it after 30 seconds. There is no word in the dictionary that describe the level of horror this victim endured.
If you're unhappy in a relationship, leave. If someone cheats on you and it can't be worked out, leave. Revenge is overrated. So much time and money spent on this ridiculous case. It was an unhealthy relationship and she killed him. This case will be unnecessarily dragged out for a decade
She can still hire/retain a private attorney.
Her ex husband paid for the first attorney. Sara fired him.
She has no money. And her ex- wants nothing to do with her now so he’s not going to help again.
Where are Sarah’s FANS when she needs them. 😂
If she had any money. Maybe that's why she wants the alimony payments out of escrow.
She doesn't know the first thing and has wasted 5 years of everyone's time. She said the attorneys perjured themselves on incorrect statements in at 16-page order?
This case is so horrendous.
She really is Evil.
She definitely has some kind of personality disorder
Sarah, Sarah, I can't breath..... Sarah......
That's right, that's my name, don't wear it out.......
Don't worry, we won't.
What does this have to do with you killing him?! WTH!
Exactly. This circus is absolutely ridiculous.
Poor Sarah is just beginning to see that she doesn't even know what it is she doesn't know.
She's a nightmare!
What a freaking nightmare she is!
Why do people keep saying they think the judge will give her standby counsel? He has already repeatedly denied her request for that and referred back to his 16 page order.
The problem is she will never find an expert to agree to her unintentional’ defense. That will cause a major issue for Sarah and this trial
Then, she will just have to do without her witnesses. Sarah could have called Spouse Abuse Inc that operates a 24 hour hotline and a DV shelter right in Orlando. They would have helped her with Court too. They have legal advocates, but why should they help her NOW when I hardly think she called them while Jorge was alive. They would have helped her to get out of that circumstance.
Agreed & that night she killed him on video IS the huge problem for her & her trial!
She also won't find one to claim that it's possible to fully zip a suitcase from the inside to the extent that you can't open it yourself.
this poor judge having to go thru boone representing herself..
This judge runs a tight ship. No nonsense.
I think he is putting up with a lot of nonsense, allowing her to hog up valuable Court time. This trial was said to take 4~5 days. I’ll be surprised if they get it done in 4~5 weeks.
The neighbors in her apartment said they heard a loud noise of something or someone falling down the stairs in her apartment. I wonder if she didn’t throw him down the stairs after he was zipped in the suitcase.
I believe she did
After 6 hours of a hate filled screaming match it was suddenly silence. This is when Sarah knocked Jorge out with the wooden bat. She then got the broken suitcase from back of the closet. Put 106 pound Jorge in the suitcase, shoved it down the stairs, and then made the videos, laughing the entire time. my opinion is based on her 3 interviews , the ear witnesses and autopsy
Almost positive and fact at this point that throwing him down the stairs while in the suitcase is precisely what she did.
@@Kevlar5255 I'm still uncertain if she pushed Jorge down the stairs first or put him in the suitcase and then pushed him down the stairs. Fact is he was incapacitated by the staircase and the suitcase no matter how it happened.
@sharonhoyt2133 The earwitnesses testimony goes to he was knocked unconscious upstairs, she retrieved suitcase from back of upstairs closet , put him in case. and shoved it down the stairs. He came to, and you know the rest. Sarah is pure evil.
She doesn't get to have standby counsel because she didn't ask to represent herself, she is forced to represent herself. Standby counsel is only in situations where the defendant makes the request to represent themselves. Sarah's constant delay tactics and all her behavior causing these attorneys to quit, disqualifies her from having standby counsel appointed to her
I'd love to be on the jury at this chit show
Now that I understand the role of standby council as it was defined at this hearing, chances are based on her track record and previous 8 attorneys, including a privately hired attorney that was #1 of 8, it would end up as "irreconcilable differences" and "ethical issues". Just as the majority of her previous attorneys with the exception of a conflict of interest, all motioned to withdraw for those reasons. Why is this any different? Sarah Boone has an idea in her head of how she wants to be represented and a strategy she wants to use clearly this is either not lawful or it's unadvisable and that's why these attorneys have withdrawn. She may not be qualified. In fact she's not. But at the same time, she was unwilling to listen to her attorneys and the advice that they gave her, along with that she was abusive insulting, disrespectful, and arrogant This is what happens when you are an argumentative narcissist who refuses to accept accountability for their actions, actions by the way she has yet to show one ounce of remorse for. In fact, she's still playing games. She knew from the last hearing they were going to digitalize discovery along with a court issued laptop and said nothing at the hearing. She decides she doesn't want that she wants the hardcopies of discovery. The judge doesn't state the obvious why didn't she raise objections at the previous hearing when she knew that this was going to be the case. He remained calm and patient, and said he didn't have a problem with it, as long as the jail approves it, the same jail that shared this was the procedure. This judge has her number and knows exactly what and who he's dealing with.. I get a little upset when I hear experts say that the Judge's ruling she forfeited her right to a public defender thru her outrageous conduct is opening the door for appeal and I have to ask have they followed this case from the beginning. Do they know every nook and cranny of it like a lot of us do, do they know that she was warned a couple of times not only that she might not be afforded another public attorney if she kept up with the behavior, she was also warned against the dangers of representing herself, more then once. She ignored and kept it up because she never believed that anyone would call her bluff. This Judge has the law on his side and I'm very confident that he covered himself in that final order. More than that I'm confident any appeal board that looks at. This case, will agree. The only only criticism I had of the court, they should have stopped her at #3. As incompetent as she is in general, certainly as her own attorney it is far better for her to get up there and make a fool of herself and tell a jury with a straight face, she didn't mean to kill him, she fell asleep after walking up a flight of stairs just before taunting Jorge Torres as he begged for his life, telling him to F-off among other choice words.
For all of what she has put the court, and the family of the victim, not to mention the rights of the victim through, it will take about 15 minutes to convict her ass
Spot on 👏👏
I don't understand why JACS didn't include that description in their recommendations on her motions.
I can't imagine why three of them suddenly came up with conflicts after talking to her.😁😅
That judge has the patience of a saint 😇
News flash, Sarah Boone! You went through eight lawyers! What did you expect? There's a new marshall in town and his name is Michael Kraynick, Judge Michael Kraynick, that is!
I thank God I was not her mother, teacher, preacher, doctor, check-out clerk, restaurant server, neighbor, or any other human who ever heard words from her mouth.
Same!
Sarah wants to be viewed as an intelligent woman.
She tries to prove it with her writing the Judge using her enriched vocabulary of big words.
When Boones addressing the Judge at her hearings she tries to exude her brilliance .
Now Sarah has a chance to show the world how smart she is during her trial ending with a successful outcome.
Go Sarah Go..
😂😂😂😂
What stood out to me was the state revealing Sarah wants to meet with them for plea negotiations. She’s going to be offered a plea. I don’t know why they would offer her a plea.
She was already offered one somewhere down the line, it was for 10 years and she refused it! I bet she’s regretting it now
I strongly doubt they'd let her plea it down to manslaughter at the point. They might offer a plea for a sentence. She's looking at between 16.75 years and life.
They only offer plea deals if they're unsure of their case, or they want to save the time and resources of going to trial. Neither of those really apply here.
Why would they offer her a plea anyway it's a fact she killed him. And sat there and watched him die. They have the body and so much evidence why offer a plea
@@doom4067 They may offer her a plea to save time and money. Look how much she has wasted so far.
@@CindyM372she's never been offered a plea.
It's interesting the experts assumed the judge would appoint standby counsel but he denied Sarah's motion
Me, a non-expert also expected stabdby counsel but maybe the judge knows that will start the attorney cycle again. To be fair, Sarah would complain about the lawyer and that would mean 1 or 2 more hearings-just wasting time and more tp money.
Me , not an expert, has been saying " the judge knows Sarah will try to use standby as atty #10, no way will he approve her motion.. ". sadly though the judge is having to explain everything to Sarah as she pretends to be clueless.
Her real defense is it wasn’t “intentional”
That’s what she says in a loop, right ? Jcs latest interrogation interview is about her case.
The problem with that is that she recorded two videos for the state. She claimed that she doesn't remember, but one theory is that she thought she deleted them. If that's true forensics will show it, and it establishes consciousness of guilt.
@@doom4067i honestly believe she didn't even remembered but Sarah does Sarah and probably she delete them
Not so smart after all
Too effing bad Sarah. No attorney is going to look at her and tell her she's not getting a conviction
It's almost like she needs a lawyer or something. Hmmpf
She’s a nightmare! I’d say worse than Darrell Brookes. Just tedious to listen too.
@@jenbabe1796 Really hard to top Darrell Brooks.
@jenbabe1796 Hard to believe, but I was thinking the same!
I don't think she tops Darrel Brooks.. he was absolutely insufferable!😓
I mean so is she tho.. so idk lol
I feel like they might also be a tie when it comes to both being absolutely riddled with VD
She didn’t agree with any attorney ideas on how to proceed. Remember it was just hide and seek. It wasn’t “intentional”.
Yes! And she excels at everything she does, so this trial will be easy peasy for her 😂.
I have such a hard time listening to her that I'm not sure I'll watch this trial. I can feel my blood pressure rise every time she opens her mouth. It's excruciating
Why are they playing hide and seek?… and pick better places to hide. 🤦🏻♀️
I would hate to be a juror in this case.
Why? I'd hide soda and popcorn in my pockets watch the circus de Boone and give my guilty verdict without a shred of guilt
@@jasonmccord9778😂😂
She delayed this trial, purposely, for four years. Now she doesn’t have enough time to prepare? She’s getting exactly what she deserves.
Come on she has video that she made on her phone what more proof is needed
She still has the right to a trial. Remember that a Florida jury believed that Casey Anthony dressed up an accident yo look like a murder.
No other proof needed. Life without parole.
She's never been satisfied with her lawyers - You'd THINK she'd have boned up on some basic tenets of law by now ... But obviously she wants that spoon fed her too.
If he did give her a lawyer,imagine what precedent that would set.
Does anyone know if Boone's inability to get counsel after explicitly saying "I am not qualified to defend myself" could be grounds for appeal down the road?
It seems everyone agrees on two things: That Boone is the client from Hell, and that the judge's ruling is a little harsher than expected. Could this possibly backfire in Boone's favor down the line?
The basis of the denial is that she forfeited her right to court appointed counsel through her actions. There is case law upholding situations somewhat similar to this which the judge cited, so he didn’t pull it out of a hat. The court of appeals could agree with him after reviewing the record or disagree, but just saying “I’m not qualified” wouldn’t be enough if the court of appeals agrees that her behavior was sufficient to warrant forfeiture. And remember that she called a few of her lawyers not qualified.
read the June 28 2024 pro se order from the judge. the judge goes 16 pages , extremely detailed, to prevent an appeals court granting her a second trial
No, Sarah's inability to work with ANY lawyer trying to represent her is only going to backfire in any appeal filing. The lawyers would potentially be released from privilege and detail that she didn't wanna listen to the lawyers, she tried to get them to do things that they can't do, etc etc. That's why she hated her lawyers, it was that they wouldn't do what she wanted them to do. The lawyer will not go along with the client's wishes if it's self-sabotaging to their case. Look at Donald Trump and see what happens when lawyers do everything the client wants, it doesn't go well. Some of those lawyers are facing sanctions, disbarment, and criminal charges.
god question, but she has refused counsel many times. if she is allowed to disqualify representation what does that open the door for ?? I don't like my lawyer because I don't approve on the choice of tie ??
Anything COULD be grounds for appeal. Even if they grant an appeal trial, she would still have to establish reasonable doubt. They'd have to let her suppress evidence to have a chance of that.
When she was entering the court she smiled at the camera.
_"I'm ready for my close-up now, Mr. DeMille."_
Yes creepy
BOONE ! You killed him !
Nice how they put Allegedly taunted him
When it's on video,
We've all seen it.
"Is he hanging from somewhere or what?" Jesus man. That 911 operator sounded so uninterested
Sarah turns everyone off!
Reminds me of the ft worth operator who had someone call saying they had an out of control 12 year old and he said "okay so do you want someone to come shoot her?"😅
She told the 911 dispatch she put him in the suitcase. Then said he got in there during her interrogation. Lies lies lies through whole interrogation.
Well he’s a grown man. I highly doubt she can put him in without him doing it willingly.
@Be1New2You3 unless she incapacitated him first. Either way, he didn't zip it up to the point that he couldn't unzip it; someone besides him did that.
@@Be1New2You3He was intoxicated and also he was a quite skinny guy. You'd be surprised what a person full of anger can do physically. Also, he had serious contusions to his head and upper chest, so it's possible he was knocked out prior. Again, he was intoxicated and fairly skinny which would've made it even easier to get him in there.
there are far too many people in the world with the same ego Sarah has.
she’s not the first, that’s for sure.
She's just highlighted the fact tho. That there are people like her thst are so entitled that they can take on the justice system after they've made a video of themselves killing someone.
I think her ego is quite fragile. It's entitlement and magical thinking. She's like a teenager.
She’s really going to piss the judge off
Why was the newscaster laughing? Thats funny?
was thinking the same, he reacted like it was a funny video of a cat smh
It's not funny. It's bizarre. When something is this bizarre it's "easy" to laugh as a reaction. It's like SMH.
Michael Ayala - can't stand him.
Timestamp? I missed it.
Thank you! I was completely confused about that. He even had a smirk on his face while talking about the video that shows a man essentially being tortured and begging to be let out. Odd. He was acting like this is some light situation and that video recording was a joke.
Her interrogation is painful to watch. She thinks she’s so convincing with her arm gestures and shocked facial expressions..acting all confident, “we had a good day! It was a good day! We’ve had good days lately, it’s been good, I don’t even know where this is coming from, we’ve been good!”….OMG I can’t.
She's going to ask the judge for a suitcase to put her papers in next 😮
😅 best comment of the day.
Sarah Boone literally has nothing else to do but mess around with the justice system...
After the judge explains his 16 page order she "believes that order is erroneous". This is Boone in a nutshell.
That was nothing special from Boone she was moaning about reporter's being there from day one.
That's the most important thing for her.
She’s must figure it out for herself. What did she think she would keep getting new attorneys? I think the judge gave her enough chances.
The judge made the right decision on not giving her another attorney. She would have probably fired them too? Delay again her trial.
I just think of Darrell Brooks if he could figure it out than she can too. Gets her out of her cell & learn a bit of lawyering. It actually sounds way better than rotting in a cell. Ha she will be doing that after her trial. She has NO defense!I can’t believe this man agreed to played “Hide-n-Seek” w/her. Why would a man get into any suitcase? This is the weirdest case ever.
She thinks she’s going to tire out the judge & make him feel sorry for her. Lol
This chick wastes so much time in court babbling. Imagine a suspected killer telling the judge he doesn’t know the law.
I really like the judge in her case. I think he’s doing the best he can to help her w/o giving legal advice, he’s not going to allow her to abuse another pro se lawyer, he’s given her a packet (from my understanding) that can give her an outline of how a trial works, how to present things etc. (I’m assuming things like in her motion where she asked for money for witnesses. He said you didn’t list the witnesses so he didn’t deny that motion necessary, but she has to list the names and why they are wanted as witnesses. So maybe it explains some things like that. Obviously I’m not in the legal field, so take my comments as a best guess as opposed to factual information. I’m more than happy for anyone who is educated in this to correct me!)
Also, I think the judge is doing his best by addressing her snarky comments like how he’s moving it from the 24th to the 26th when he doesn’t have 50 other cases so he can give more time and focus to her case specifically. He’s trying to cater to her in a reasonable way, shutting down her constant barrage of “this isn’t fair, everyone sucks but me, no one’s listening to me” nonsense.
I think it’s going to be very tedious. I have a hard time even watching family court cases where one person represents themselves and it’s only like an hour long. But Sarah is never going to be happy with any legal representation because no one is willing to let her run the show. She’s probably demanding things that you just can’t do, things that you wouldn’t be able to bring up in court and she doesn’t understand that there’s a method to how you present a case. But she just thinks the lawyers were being difficult and disrespectful to her, but she wouldn’t let them explain why her way wouldn’t work. She’ll find out though. She’s not going to be happy… as per usual.
That quote...A person who represents himself has a fool for a lawyer comes to mind
Classic case of fk around and find out!! She wanted to fk around with 8 lawyers so this now is your doing sweetheart. Deal with it!! She is so Guilty.
Trying to rationalise the behaviour of someone who is unstable will likely be fruitless. She may simply be unable to regulate or her motivation may change moment to moment
She puts him in a suitcase to play a game of hide and seek and then "falls asleep" after knowing that he can't breathe???? Come on. Give me a break. She is guilt of MURDER.
Hide n seek makes no sense. You don't help the only other person playing hide. I'd love to know the real truth of the circumstances to him getting in the suitcase.
@@leahw2124 Me, too. SO bizarre.
@@leahw2124we will never know because she won't tell. I believe she manipulated him into thinking it was a prank. She'd previously dine it with her son and put it on her Facebook. She was reported to Cyps for it. But it was a prank and they l et it go. I'm sure that's how she talked him into getting into the case . That's why sh called him stupid in the video. Not sure if she threw him down the stairs. The police think she bashed him with her sons baseball bat while he was in the case.
Always trying to blame alcohol for her behavior. It's got nothing to do with alcohol. She's a demon on het own.
That's not how hide and seek game works
When Sarah Boone says “you didn’t listen to me!” she really means “you are wrong because you didn’t AGREE with me!” She is such a narc!
Plea bargain and try to get 10yrs off. Avoid the trial.
I have never seen a picture of her boyfriend before. Playing hide and seek, but they both decided he should climb into a suitcase!? That's ridiculous. He fell off his friend's bike?
Sarah Boone (and other narcissists like her) think nobody is listening to what she's saying. What she doesn't understand is that people ARE listening, they just don't agree.
Did that news anchor laugh as he was saying "while she was filming?"
Yes. His co-anchor looks annoyed by him.
that was Michael Ayala ... can't stand him
If I was her. I’d let my lawyer use ANY argument to get me out or a leaner sentence. Period.
And this is what happens when you're unwilling to listen to your counsel. You don't know what you're doing, Sarah!
Yet she's continuing to tell the Judge he isn't doing his job right. 🙄🙄🙄
She’s a liar
If she wanted privacy, she shouldn't have murdered Jorge!
She is stalling because she's afraid to go to federal prison!
Judge better not find emself stuck in a suitcase anytime soon near sarah boone
she is still writing letters to the governor, trying to get her first judge fired. she will devote hours daily for rest of her evil life in prison trying to get judges, attorneys , the jury members all fired or at least slandering them . she gets a high from hurting everyone she crosses paths with
The Judge simply can not give her another Court Appointed attorney OR Court Appointed standby counsel! We KNOW what she will do if he does! He is wise for making that decision! She claims that her “fans” would come up with “any amount of money” to “bond her out of jail!” So presumably, they should be able to do the same and hire her an attorney, which they or SHE still has the RIGHT to do! She has that right! She does NOT have the RIGHT to any more Court Appointed Counsel! She forfeited that right due to her own conduct! This Judge is on solid ground in my opinion.
Cray, cray 🫣😬🤣
Her problem is that she believes she has any chance of getting off easy for her crime. She's not willing to accept the reality that all of her past attorneys have laid out on the table, so she keeps searching for someone who will make her look good in court, but that's just not possible. I'm sure she's regretting tossing those attorneys now. She's clearly in way over her head.
She was smart enough to not fire them. She forced them to quit in an effort to delay the trial forever, in a belief that speedy trial applies when the defense causes the delays.