Gutted I bought a falcon FQ35 now...compromised on the LRF for the quality of image and now 6 months later the Condor comes out with an even better image and an LRF...for the same cash...I mean the Falcon is amazing but this ticks all the boxes.
Just looked through both the telos and condor,bought the condor,nothing between them in image quality but telos felt heavier and not as comfortable to use if you use on a nights foxing,plus the small matter of nearly a grand between them.
IMO all of these thermal monoculars have no problem detecting animals when you have clear sight. What differentiates Pulsar Axion 2 models, Hikmicro (Condor CQ35) and Zeiss 4/35 is the ability to detect heat behind trees, bush, branches and so on. My experience is that Pulsar and Zeiss has a slight edge over Hikmicro. While the Pulsar image itself is worse, it does excell in detection under aforementioned conditions.
Wow the image quality looks amazing even on the video so I can only imagine how good it looks using it personally.
Great video mate cheers from
Australia 🇦🇺
Gutted I bought a falcon FQ35 now...compromised on the LRF for the quality of image and now 6 months later the Condor comes out with an even better image and an LRF...for the same cash...I mean the Falcon is amazing but this ticks all the boxes.
Great video, made my mind up - condor on order, which headtorch is that ? looks good 😀
when you look throgh the cq35 pro is it a round image or a rectangle you see
How long did you get out of the battery I got 40 minutes out of cq35
Nice piece of kit , do you have to remortgage the house to buy one ?
lowest end CH25 £1499, Highest end CQ50 £2449 retail. still makes them a good deal better value than its competitors. Hope this helps
How does it stack upto the pulsar telos
Just looked through both the telos and condor,bought the condor,nothing between them in image quality but telos felt heavier and not as comfortable to use if you use on a nights foxing,plus the small matter of nearly a grand between them.
Best thermal on the market today including the new telos
IMO all of these thermal monoculars have no problem detecting animals when you have clear sight. What differentiates Pulsar Axion 2 models, Hikmicro (Condor CQ35) and Zeiss 4/35 is the ability to detect heat behind trees, bush, branches and so on. My experience is that Pulsar and Zeiss has a slight edge over Hikmicro. While the Pulsar image itself is worse, it does excell in detection under aforementioned conditions.
The Flacon FQ50 have a 0.9 apature lens. so should have a little bit better image actually
I wish this had been available when I bought my FH35. I wanted an LRF but was pointed toward the Falcon.
buy a chaep lrf and test different ranges in your territory, so you can estimate the range better.
Is it better than the pulsar telios??
Do you think this is a big upgrade from the Gryphon qc35?
Does it have a red laser?
whe you look through th cq35 l i ment
I have the CH 25 on order for rats rabbit to shoot range air rifle use
Which one for the rats and rabbits up to 50 yards the lad
I have seen a video of the thermtec 670d where you could Id a rabbit at 340m.
Have the issues with the batteries draining been fixed yet ? Im thinking of getting the cq50 but a little concerened .
Hi James Yes there was a firmware issue on some off the first batch which has now been resolved. hope this helps