FF to 6:50, 22:20. Thank you! This answers a LOT! Mt 18 - *"In his name"* is *intentional, formal, collective, organized assembling or gathering.* Officers qualified appointed, members added, excluded, disciplined, issues voted, etc. Church discipline. "Two or three are gathered," "whatever is bound," verses. 1Cor 5:3-5 interprets Mt 18! God's power is present in a special way (compared to other places) in the formal assembling. He is especially present in that place! WHERE THE CHURCH GATHERS IS HOLY GROUND. God's presence is here in a way *DIFFERENT THAN THE REST OF LIFE.* THEREFORE, A SPECIAL CONDUCT IS EXPECTED. House or household can be temple or family. But HOUSE OF GOD = TEMPLE/Church. IT IS NOT OURRRRR HOUSE, READ AGAIN! GN 28:16. EX 3:5. JOSH 5:15. 1TIM 3:15-16. HB 10:21, 1P2:5. Nice! Must be a Baptist! Why? LOL @its 1/2 over and he says, "this is the FIRST reason" LOL
Only Scripture is worship under RPW, so only the Scripture reading or singing is truly praising God according to reformed theology (other elements could be included in the service but non-scripture in prayer and preaching has to be reckoned non-worship). Another problem is the Westminster confession says that only the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts are truly the Word of God (so the service would have to be in Greek/Hebrew; since no one has the original manuscripts we could never be sure that we are actually worshipping).
I hope his Church doesn't offer coffee after the service. Coffee is not in the Bible. Nah thanks, I won't be reformed. I like a cross in my Church, I like to celebrate Christmas and Easter in my church. It's about Jesus
You must not have listened to the sermon. It proves you a fool to have such strong opinions on what you clearly don’t understand, and don’t have the intent to understand. You’ve offered nothing but straw man fallacies in your criticism, and to reason like a fool is sin. You need to repent.
38:07 changed my perspective on the weightiness of this conversation
31:00 The argument around the phrase "The church of the living Gid" is so excellent. great video
FF to 6:50, 22:20. Thank you! This answers a LOT!
Mt 18 - *"In his name"* is *intentional, formal, collective, organized assembling or gathering.* Officers qualified appointed, members added, excluded, disciplined, issues voted, etc.
Church discipline. "Two or three are gathered," "whatever is bound," verses.
1Cor 5:3-5 interprets Mt 18! God's power is present in a special way (compared to other places) in the formal assembling. He is especially present in that place!
WHERE THE CHURCH GATHERS IS HOLY GROUND. God's presence is here in a way *DIFFERENT THAN THE REST OF LIFE.*
THEREFORE, A SPECIAL CONDUCT IS EXPECTED.
House or household can be temple or family. But HOUSE OF GOD = TEMPLE/Church.
IT IS NOT OURRRRR HOUSE, READ AGAIN!
GN 28:16. EX 3:5. JOSH 5:15.
1TIM 3:15-16. HB 10:21, 1P2:5.
Nice! Must be a Baptist! Why? LOL @its 1/2 over and he says, "this is the FIRST reason" LOL
Thank You.
Only Scripture is worship under RPW, so only the Scripture reading or singing is truly praising God according to reformed theology (other elements could be included in the service but non-scripture in prayer and preaching has to be reckoned non-worship). Another problem is the Westminster confession says that only the original Greek and Hebrew manuscripts are truly the Word of God (so the service would have to be in Greek/Hebrew; since no one has the original manuscripts we could never be sure that we are actually worshipping).
This is an inaccurate representation of RPW and the Westminster Confession. Was this intentional or are you being sincere?
You have a good point
I hope his Church doesn't offer coffee after the service. Coffee is not in the Bible. Nah thanks, I won't be reformed. I like a cross in my Church, I like to celebrate Christmas and Easter in my church. It's about Jesus
You must not have listened to the sermon. It proves you a fool to have such strong opinions on what you clearly don’t understand, and don’t have the intent to understand.
You’ve offered nothing but straw man fallacies in your criticism, and to reason like a fool is sin. You need to repent.
You missed and or didn't understand what was said at all
@@boomee78 typical Calvinist answer to ANY objection or criticism.