Ai is only useful to people who can actually code, write, draw etc. Unless you create "content" lol oh my God "content" imagine being a "content creator" hahaha.
Nah. I tried to learn coding. 100+ hours. Hopeless so I gave up. Asked chat gpt, and now i got 5 apps that my workplace paid for and use daily. So to summarize: already chat gpt is better than a 100+ hours trainee. AI has barely touched the world. Imagine when it takes all its current learning and applies it. And next version. And next. To believe that AI cannot replace humans writing Computer language is as likely as to believe Jesus will drop down with a fix for your personal bankruptcy when you spend it all on gambling😂
Never coded before. Now i have hundreds in lines in code for personal software and macros. General architecture and problem solving will still be needed.
Saying that you don't need to learn coding, because AI will do it for you is like saying that you don't need to learn math, because there will be calculators in the future
I asked AI a leetcode problem it hadn't been trained on since I modified it with a few spins and it failed miserably. Meanwhile I had a solution I personally tested and it worked. Ai is a dummy.
@@AdityaKrishna-k8w AI can solve problem which we already know and repetitive. It cant innovate or custom build software. It cannot attach software pieces together to make meaningful system to work for humans.
its just that 10 years ago everybody was saying we need more programmers, not that its not true - we still need developers but the need for a junior programmer is non existent even at this point
Huang is an electrical engineer that has basically only worked for Nvidia (well, ok, co-founded) but he isn't invested in the greater software world or the people He is invested in Nvidia. And Nvidia is dumping literally all their money into AI so guess what he is gonna push...
AI will not replace devs, only assist them. Any senior knows this. Its like thinking that 3D printing will replace construction workers. Simply foolish to anyone with a bit of experience
@@qscmplx Im not basing my assumption on the current state of AI. Im basing it on the reality of what the developers job consists of. You see, the quality of software lies solely in the definition of requirements. Which is a dynamic, living list. AI's do not em or deploy software development protocols or adhere to company guidelines. You are still in the fantasy bubble of AI, anyone with a lick of knowledge of how they actually work knows that theyre far inferior than people make them seem. They are pretty dumb when you get down to it.
3d printing and other new construction machinery will indeed replace construction workers. Like calculators replaced manual calculation workers so will ai replace low level coding jobs. Only problem solving skills will remain valuable. Coding jobs will be more accessible to people in other more problem solving intensive fields like mathematics and physics and some other kinds of engineering hence resulting in great decline in coding specific skills but increase in demand for problem solving skills in general. There might remain no career with only coding specific skills. Tho I think that even problem solving will be automated and become human independent in enough time (like 30 years or so) .
The 3D printing analogy is actually spot on! I’ve seen a lot of more junior devs say that it will easily replace programmers and that is true from their perspective, but if you have worked on any large scale or complex system you will definitely know we’re no where near being able to replace competent senior engineers. Just like we’re no where near being able to 3D print the Empire State Building.
@@sidbarrack7938We can't 3d print the empire state building yet, but we already can build multi level buildings with 3d printing. It only improves every year. Give 3d printing and ai 5-10 years
"Don't learn to read, or write, or think, just use Google Lens" "Don't learn to use pen and paper, just buy my keyboard" "Don't learn to type on the keyboard, just use voice typing" "Be stupid enough so you are completely lost without our product!"
Thank you sir for your opinions It really boosted my passion more Since I heard from that CEO,it got me rethinking my career ,but hearing from you just reassured me to keep pushing
I think this CEO should be more concerned that experienced developers using AI as a tool are very likely to make himself irrelevant. With AI as a tool it is more easy than ever before to become a successful solo entrepreneur. And just think about it - if everybody will be using AI, who will have more advantage in software market - CEO with some basic understanding in programming or professional programmer with years of practical experience?
Absolutely agree Mosh. I'm a full stack dev of 5 years and there are far far too many things in the creation of software that an AI would simply not be able to do. They can't architect and re-architect software, configure cloud features, or modify software upon a customers new feature request. It can't understand the requirements of a business and create of modify software to the level that humans or a business needs. It really is just a helper tool to speed up development - We may find in the future software becomes much faster to create, due to these helpful AI tools... but replacing software engineers? No chance. Not at least for a VERY long time yet.
AI is growing exponentially. Once taught, AI can co everything you’ve mentioned much more efficiently and errors free. Can’t say that about human coders 😂
My perspective on this, as I’ve tried learning to code on python and C++, is that I need to learn problem solving more than understanding the syntax. I genuinely believe that with the advancement of AI, we will need to adapt and how this looks like is learning to think in systematic ways and creative problem solving, and letting AI solve the nitty gritty and focus on the syntax. Maybe if I learn coding at a conceptual level and know why something works, I can better interact with the code and AI to solve specific problems and give better and laser targeted prompts to solve specific problems. So in other words what I’m proposing is that we start learning and thinking in systems, a more holistic and higher level approach, that will allow us to dedicate more time to the creative side of development rather than worrying about the technical aspects of programming… I’m happy to hear what others think.
I used to think Jensen was wrong because in enterprise software development which is a very human process-mapped activity with many regulated and unremovable human checks and balances, that development lifecycle would never change. But I must say with GPT 4o now, I'm not too sure anymore. If you could include GPT 4o live in your R&D meetings - just imagine this - GPT 4o could immediately draw up prototypes on the spot when you discuss about it (and share it in the teams meetings - where business analysts can work in tandem to comment and correct the understanding if it was wrong), and if its inferencing capabilities lets it understand business and human processes and then have it design the ERD diagram, create the functional & tech specifications, generate a few UI/UX themes for humans to choose from, and upon approval by a project manager, generate the entire codebase according to the approved specs. We as coders might be toast. I think this is what Jensen is talking about. I think the "AI is a tool argument" might really be 99% AI and 1% human. The coder will be completely replaced, and the only human remaining in this loop will be the non-technical business analyst.
A salesman that led a company to perfectly transition from gaming to workstations to cloud compute to web3 to AI? I'm sure he's "just" a salesman and the uploader of this channel who literally sells courses about programming totally isn't one🤣
@@nigel-uno He didn't say it wrong though, He is a sales man at first and then one who thinks analytically to guide the company, Guiding and doing stuff yourself has alot of difference in there bro.
as a senior developer in top 10 semiconductor company, i can say that our CIO sees AI as a tool to increase efficiency and he will not let AI do the critical decisions. A mistake in IT applications can cause millions of dollars is just a matter of hours.
I’m too lazy to write any comments usually. But Node took a special place in my heart, it was my first commercial experience back in 2016-2019, and I miss working with Node sometimes.
People - AI will never replace program developers. Near future- AI brilliantly write frontend and backend code programs and comunicate with customer with a natural language.
I have 5 years of full-stack experience. I was shocked when heard what he said it. A few other AI experts were also so futuristic. But I will keep grinding! I feel the fear but being replaced does not make all the sense.
The only time humans won't need to learn coding is if the concept of computers ceased existence. Coding is also an art form in certain circles. There isn't a possibility of coding going away. Not to mention the big elephant in the room... Code is AI; AI is code
Thank You for this video. I’m just starting to learn coding and so far it’s going very well. Then I hear this particular CEOs say coding is a waste of time and AI will replace it. Now that I know this, I’m going to keep coding!😊
My brother told me I shouldn’t have my kids study language because they’re a technologies that can translate through earpieces now. Learning language develops your brain learning how to code develops your brain. It is a good exercise in the same way that lifting weights develops your muscles. What else are you going to do with your time Might as well better yourselves. Of course, in 100 years we could be back to the Stone Age and those language skills might kick in again. You don’t know what tomorrow brings even though you think you do do you think any of these businessman or the people on 9/11 that jumped out of those buildings and vision themselves in those situations Before hand? Today is great. Tomorrow is not guaranteed. I know guys who made them selves, millionaires, saving for retirement and died of cancer before they could retire. Today is grace tomorrow is not guaranteed.
Well it depends, as a senior engineer, yeah, but junior devs who are looking to get hired... yeah, a lot of tech companies are shedding workers mostly because the senior devs can now do the work of 3 senior devs from before chatgpt, no need to have juniors anymore.
government should subsidize a few all humans devs companies, if only to keep coding skills still alive in the country, similar to how the US preserved part of it's manufacturing capabilities.
Coding is not dead. It's just become heavily abstracted by the early programmers. Ai as a tool being one of them. But coding is dying for new devs, because it is getting exponentially more difficult to land a job. New tools everywhere and companies are expecting too much. Employeers need to realize that leetcode is dead. That is exactly what the bot is better at. And you can't fault new programmers for using a tool that was created by the early programmers themselves, for the purpose and sake of abstraction.
can you elaborate on this matter perhaps on a complete video? it would be nice to hear some real world examples that ai may come short, atleast for the near future.
AI comes short in everything. It sucks, all it can do is snippets. Its literally like saying 3D printing will replace construction workers. No, just no. You can 3D print a door handle yes but not an entire house. The same goes for AI and code.
@@BRIANROSERI understand that it cannot perform on levels of designing a complete software on its own, what i was wondering is that in the near future perhaps 10 years from now, can AI evolve to join those snippets to actually design software? what are some factors that locks out ai to interfere multiple careers in software engineering? maybe creativity?
For me i think what it can't do yet is learn the full context of a project , like it can build you ui of a page and stuff but it can't fully develop and continuously innovate and update , design new solutions for your oroject thats why we still need humans
@@N1essohIt’s difficult to predict things in the future. Sometimes predictions are right but sometimes they are wrong. We just have to remember that these predictions are not in our control. So, if by any chance, you are paralyzed by the fear of what the future holds just remember to take it day by day and focus on things you can control. Bonus points if you can position yourself to understand and learn AI architecture, how to prompt engineer or other new tools you will have to learn to keep yourself competitive in the workforce.
Dude, are you up to date with the latest AI development in code generation? It's not about just generating a simple code snippet anymore. AI is definitely gonna replace a lot of developers (i'm a dev myself).
To be fair, he’s saying it will replace coders in THE FUTURE. How far in the future is open for debate, but it can definitely write good basic functions right now. At the speed it’s moving, it might be able to write full scripts within a few years. After that, full programs. I think coders have a good 5 to 10yrs before having to be legitimately worried.
Its amazing how naive the creator is. These models are getting better every day, if you cant see whats coming then you might deserve whats heading your way.
What he said, developing software may not be the same as how we do now. In the future AI sits between software and developer. And code will not be the medium.
That is a much better argument. Still pretty sure the guy that knows how to code. He’s going to get the job just like the guy who drove horses became the chauffeur. The correct term for someone that pilots a car watercraft or aircraft is a pilot. Yet those who drive trucks and cars are referred to as drivers even though they never drove an animal. So don’t tell me the guy with the coding skills isn’t getting first dibs at that job.
@@SeanEustace-zk3mcIt's the same argument, It's just that he actually thought it through and explained it. What you fail to understand is that what jobs remain are going to become a serious competition, because we will have a lot of capable people, but they will have to compete for fewer positions...
Very much agreed. Although I can't write a single line of code and Ai is bloody amazing, its still a complementary to human capacity and not yet an Agi to replace anything and everything
It's actually true. While AI won't entirely replace coders, it does make coding faster, leading to a reduced need for as many coders over time. Ultimately, this could result in a smaller coder workforce, in my opinion.
It also means that development will be less expensive for small companies, so they can start their development and that can lead to more work places for programmers
We will only see a more or less clear answer after the "AI bubble" pops and the dust settles. But having some experience in software development, I can definitely say that creating a working piece of even mildly complex software by writing a prompt is way less possible than some people seem to think it is.
@@chronometer9931 still not good enough to replace a proper developer for any moderately complex tasks. Whether it ever will be, and whether it will ever be widely adopted we'll know when the dust settles.
I have been a software developer for several years but I left that to get a PhD with a focus on Machine Learning. Jensen Huang isn't completely wrong. AI is going to replace a lot of coding. Maybe not all coding but a majority of it. The part that will be left is the 10x programmer. And that doesn't mean hire 10 programmers. A 10x programmer can solve some problems that normal programmers don't have the capacity to solve (and you cannot learn that).
I thought, in truth, AI would provide a new kind of RAD tool. That is something that saves time and boilerplate, but doesn't replace a dev. AI could be harnessed into a dashboard; an AI assisted executive mgmt system. You could, in fact, replace a data analyst with this. Carve 100 analysts down to 10. Infiltrate a fast track into the backend that accesses the data warehouse. A dashboard that not only provides data, but helps a director make decisions and take action. Data analysts do use a lot of boilerplate. It's been done before, and the pipeline is heavy weighted and costly.
The legal complexities of the system actually stand a pretty good chance of keeping them employed, companies are too afraid to be held liable by self-driving mistakes.
Take it easy people. Let me translate what Nvidia and Jensen meant: 1) shorter term, AI can do and potentially automate the technical work of coding but for now I don’t think the complicated problem solving and the logic related work to coding can be replaced (yet). For example language model eg Gpt-3 doesn’t understand purposes and structure of source codes yet 2) but tech companies are incentivized to replace high cost coding resources as practical when machine learning and AI will advance considerably in next 5 yrs or sooner.
Don't worry, in future, company no need to have a CEO. Because CEO job can be done by A.I. Just ask A.I about what future plan for a company. The A.I will answer for it. ✌🏻😁
On the flip side, he must know where the chip technology is heading. Just the way transformer models changed our content generation 24 months back, same must be in the hardware realm.
The point is not that AI will completely replace the programmers. The point is that AI will make programmers so efficient such that one person utilizing AI to build applications will be like 30x more productive than an average programmer of today's era. Hence, instead of 30 folks, tech companies can choose to hire one skilled programmer who knows how to use AI as a copilot to code. Of course there will be people always required to manage a software application. But the number of folks required to do the same job gets reduced drastically in a few years. That was what the Nvidia CEO meant
You don't need to learn assembly language which used to be in past, bcoz we have a whole environment for that nowadays. Same for some programming languages today.
You may be right. But also he can because as CEO he know potential about staff which are not shared publiclly or see potential super fast grow of potential in next years. But everything can be only guess.
Ai is a tool and its the efficiency that will replace some programers since less will likely be needed when the tool can write chunks of the programming and have the programmer revise it.
He's just a boomer. Huang's argument: "I wish young people a lot of suffering, because tenacity and resilience come with suffering." Never would I wish my peers any suffering...
they should focus on making a.i the perfect teacher, tutor which can easily teach anyone even the most complex topics. it starts at the education level, imagine you had an a.i who can teach you human anatomy within weeks compared to years and make it stick. then you'd have enough professionals.
I see so many people using the calculator analogy and rightfully so. The main issue of this CEO's statement is its ignorance. If people stop learning to code then a huge gap will start to appear in our knowledge. If we surrender that to AI then what's next? If we keep surrendering aspects of our lives to AI then eventually we will end up being a society where we are ruled by AI amd we just sit there and stagnate. We as a species define ourselves by our progress. Progress is made through innovation. Take that away and what are we? Bumps on a log who do nothing.
I’m playing devil’s advocate. I think his statement is misinterpreted on an emotional level. He projected a reduced need for needing to learn code, but that’s not synonymous with what you actually are - problem solvers and engineers. A coding language is simply a way to get from problem to solution. It’s like a 1960s finance auditor with a briefcase full of calculators, formulas and spreadsheets which were needed to manipulate numbers. Now we have Excel. I don’t need to remember how to calculate 100 formulas to calculate things, Excel does it for me, so that I can do my job more efficiently. There will always be a need for people who can assess a problem and come up with a solution, but instead of writing the code yourself, you’ll have AI do it exponentially faster then tweak it as needed, through natural language until you get your desired solution.
AI is definitely going to make significant upgrades on developing But i doesn't mean we won't need devs and software engineers anymore. Opposite. New technology needs new specialists to maintain and work with
we've seen entire industries replaced or made obsolete by technological revolutions in the past, you'd be remiss to think programming is immune/resistant or that AI is not bringing about the next revolution. If AI was a figurative nuke on the jobs industry, programmers would be ground zero, id feel much safer in the trades but even thats only relative. programming will become purely a hobby in the not so distant future
@@zulkernainyead1933 you clearly dont know what youre talking about and you clearly read what you wanted to read not what I actually wrote, and then decided to manifest you delusions in a nonsense comment after arguing with the voices in your head about something no one was talking about except you. anyway thanks for sharing your feelings 👍🏿
yeah, Jensen is not your friend, guys. He is a typical modern big-corpo CEO, thinking only about what kind of lies and bs he has to push, to get enough hype - for his bonus check and retirement benefits. What he is saying is conceptually wrong (and there is a reason why he is pushing this to an audience that can`t even argue with him). The main reason software development is quite a robust field - is because it is a field with a constant "work in progress" dynamics. It is a young field, with tons of stuff to improve. Switching to AI would mean, that we are freezing ourselves in space and time, accepting the fact, that we stop improving, stop working on safety issues, stop optimizing, basically, that we say, that current codebase is some sort of golden standard and there is nothing left to do. Which is completely wild and absurd thing to say, for anyone, who is not hyping up his company`s stocks. To advance, you need ppl who understand how it works under the hood. Using AI with you human language communication, means that you are abstracting to the highest level possidle. It means, that you giving up on literally every form of control and customization, and just hoping that you won`t need to change anything. It is a highest form of "copy-pasting" :D Now, it is nothing new in programming, after all, we all use frameworks and libs, and compilers etc to abstract things - but it already comes with significant cost. And we already know, that the best products are made by ppl who , if needed, can avoid mindless abstraction and "coping", and go "deep" and customize things. Your average Joe who uses pre-built website will never look under the hood to understand what is going on, and will have no idea on how to fix anything. Same happens if AI gives you a code, that does not work. You literally have to learn to code, to fix it or to identify problem or dangerous practice being used there. So, the moment you stop improving - AI starts to stagnate. The moment you stop filling internet with terabytes of code with better solutions, with newer stuff, new patches and updates, AI will be frozen in time.
We're only 1 year into AI - just imagine what GPT-6 can do! As a professional software engineer of 10 yrs, I and many of my peers have changed industries due to layoffs and lack of jobs. If you want to stay, get a masters or doctorate in AI.
I'm afraid this is not a strong argument. You're opining on current AIs while he was talking about future advanced models. They will most certainly be a replacement in the future. As for qualifications, he is highly knowledgeable in AI and what he says on that topic matters a lot.
Like calculators replaced manual calculation workers so will ai replace low level coding jobs. Only problem solving skills will remain valuable. Coding jobs will be more accessible to people in other more problem solving intensive fields like mathematics and physics and some other kinds of engineering hence resulting in great decline in coding specific skills but increase in demand for problem solving skills in general. There might remain no career with only coding specific skills. You should focus on problem solving more than learning about a programming language and terms associated with it.
And the most hillarious thing is, if you want to know the opinion of AI itself - I asked chat gpt if AI will replace software engineers and the answer was quite similar to this
Yeah definitely ostrich reflex. Imagine yourself in their shoes and it is understandable, all those years they put in. I am sure a bunch of horse guys were the same with the advent of the automobile.
Devin is dogshit and while it might take a couple of super light entry level jobs, it's miles away from even removing a single software engineer. Scaling, security, performable, legacy and more will never be close to as good via tools like Devin. You can't use AI to create new systems when the AI is only taught precious knowledge.
Thanks for speaking fax,cause he is just trying to promote his ai and , that if people stop learning to code ,then they will stop developing and will make to depend on that ai for all
I never liked AI at all. But we must face the fact it changed the style of living and working like no other technology so far in insane short period of time. And that's a terrified fact. AI should have stayed behind the door for special purposes, closed systems, military, police,... but not widely opened for everyone. Not just because someone will lose his job but it will dramatically change everything. And definitely will replace programmers more or less in the very near future. A man made a new being on the already destroyed planet. A man again plays the role of the God.
He doesn’t believe it. He wants the people he’s selling to believe it.
And what are you expecting from the men who is selling their Courses? 😂
AI is the future and people who know how to code can jump into AI more easily than others.
Ai is only useful to people who can actually code, write, draw etc. Unless you create "content" lol oh my God "content" imagine being a "content creator" hahaha.
The more you use their tools the more likely hood you will be training it to do your job.
Everyone should learn how to program but not everyone should learn how to code
Glad someone as reputable as you is saying this. The AI hype train needs a reality check.
Humans are irreplaceable for a long time.
Nah.
I tried to learn coding. 100+ hours.
Hopeless so I gave up.
Asked chat gpt, and now i got 5 apps that my workplace paid for and use daily.
So to summarize: already chat gpt is better than a 100+ hours trainee.
AI has barely touched the world. Imagine when it takes all its current learning and applies it. And next version. And next.
To believe that AI cannot replace humans writing Computer language is as likely as to believe Jesus will drop down with a fix for your personal bankruptcy when you spend it all on gambling😂
Never coded before. Now i have hundreds in lines in code for personal software and macros. General architecture and problem solving will still be needed.
Probably true, but don't forget that Nvidia is business (Big business) and they're selling something, they can say wtv they want to make you buy it
Mosh yt channel in danger 😢
Saying that you don't need to learn coding, because AI will do it for you is like saying that you don't need to learn math, because there will be calculators in the future
Well said! Great analogy!
@@programmingwithmosh What are your views regarding Devin AI?
I think it may be more and more like natural languages programming.BUT the world still needs logic design and architecture design.
Spot on!
Oh yeah, they say it completed Jobs on Upwork
@@ronjobs2359
“AI is a tool, not a replacement”. Well said and So true. Thank you Mosh.
Wrong. It is a replacement. This video is just cope.
correct for now, but probably not for long.
So naive
Ask him to fire all developers in nvidia and write his graphics card drivers using AI
Bruh😂😂
My thoughts exactly. It'd definitely be a great disaster
someday he will
I asked AI a leetcode problem it hadn't been trained on since I modified it with a few spins and it failed miserably. Meanwhile I had a solution I personally tested and it worked. Ai is a dummy.
@@AdityaKrishna-k8w AI can solve problem which we already know and repetitive. It cant innovate or custom build software. It cannot attach software pieces together to make meaningful system to work for humans.
its just that 10 years ago everybody was saying we need more programmers, not that its not true - we still need developers but the need for a junior programmer is non existent even at this point
how is it non existent
Without being a junior developer how can one become a senior developer directly without experience? 😅
@@swanandpatil9675 yeah, seems like the problem for humans at the moment
AI can do all the simple codes now.
@@swanandpatil9675 Yeah, Literally...
Huang is an electrical engineer that has basically only worked for Nvidia (well, ok, co-founded) but he isn't invested in the greater software world or the people He is invested in Nvidia. And Nvidia is dumping literally all their money into AI so guess what he is gonna push...
Also, I appreciate Mosh take on this!!
And Jensen will be proven right.😂😂😂
AI will not replace devs, only assist them. Any senior knows this. Its like thinking that 3D printing will replace construction workers. Simply foolish to anyone with a bit of experience
@@qscmplx Im not basing my assumption on the current state of AI. Im basing it on the reality of what the developers job consists of.
You see, the quality of software lies solely in the definition of requirements. Which is a dynamic, living list. AI's do not em or deploy software development protocols or adhere to company guidelines.
You are still in the fantasy bubble of AI, anyone with a lick of knowledge of how they actually work knows that theyre far inferior than people make them seem.
They are pretty dumb when you get down to it.
@@jlf120you do know technological development grows exponentially,so we might never know...
3d printing and other new construction machinery will indeed replace construction workers. Like calculators replaced manual calculation workers so will ai replace low level coding jobs. Only problem solving skills will remain valuable. Coding jobs will be more accessible to people in other more problem solving intensive fields like mathematics and physics and some other kinds of engineering hence resulting in great decline in coding specific skills but increase in demand for problem solving skills in general. There might remain no career with only coding specific skills.
Tho I think that even problem solving will be automated and become human independent in enough time (like 30 years or so) .
The 3D printing analogy is actually spot on! I’ve seen a lot of more junior devs say that it will easily replace programmers and that is true from their perspective, but if you have worked on any large scale or complex system you will definitely know we’re no where near being able to replace competent senior engineers. Just like we’re no where near being able to 3D print the Empire State Building.
@@sidbarrack7938We can't 3d print the empire state building yet, but we already can build multi level buildings with 3d printing. It only improves every year. Give 3d printing and ai 5-10 years
"Don't learn to read, or write, or think, just use Google Lens"
"Don't learn to use pen and paper, just buy my keyboard"
"Don't learn to type on the keyboard, just use voice typing"
"Be stupid enough so you are completely lost without our product!"
Literally the face of industry....😂
Truer words have never been spoken.
Wow, i would love to see more shorts like this mosh, very impressive and useful 🎉
More to come!
Thank you sir for your opinions
It really boosted my passion more
Since I heard from that CEO,it got me rethinking my career ,but hearing from you just reassured me to keep pushing
I think this CEO should be more concerned that experienced developers using AI as a tool are very likely to make himself irrelevant. With AI as a tool it is more easy than ever before to become a successful solo entrepreneur. And just think about it - if everybody will be using AI, who will have more advantage in software market - CEO with some basic understanding in programming or professional programmer with years of practical experience?
Well said@@ingarskrafts3813
@@ingarskrafts3813
Don’t kid yourself. A rich corporation with AI is a monster that eats everything.
Keep learning and thanks for teaching us brother 👍
CEOs are managers, business men, relationship builders between companies, don't forget that.
After loosing all the hope, got some motivation from this video. Thank you Mosh ❤
Absolutely agree Mosh. I'm a full stack dev of 5 years and there are far far too many things in the creation of software that an AI would simply not be able to do. They can't architect and re-architect software, configure cloud features, or modify software upon a customers new feature request. It can't understand the requirements of a business and create of modify software to the level that humans or a business needs. It really is just a helper tool to speed up development - We may find in the future software becomes much faster to create, due to these helpful AI tools... but replacing software engineers? No chance. Not at least for a VERY long time yet.
will know in a few years
Have you looked at Devins? There are now agents that can do architecture and design. Software coding will be much more impacted than we think
You are ignorant on how fast AI is progressing
AI is growing exponentially. Once taught, AI can co everything you’ve mentioned much more efficiently and errors free. Can’t say that about human coders 😂
Thank you Mosh! you nailed it! It is a problem solving tool not a replacment! stay safe!
❤ I love your heartening comment here, I only dabble at code, it's delightful to hear you reassure and respect the coder. ❤
Mosh also wants his RUclips channel to be running, of course he is speaking this to keep his audience engaged on channel.
You think a person selling courses would say you need to worry about cs jobs in the future? LOL cmon
My perspective on this, as I’ve tried learning to code on python and C++, is that I need to learn problem solving more than understanding the syntax.
I genuinely believe that with the advancement of AI, we will need to adapt and how this looks like is learning to think in systematic ways and creative problem solving, and letting AI solve the nitty gritty and focus on the syntax. Maybe if I learn coding at a conceptual level and know why something works, I can better interact with the code and AI to solve specific problems and give better and laser targeted prompts to solve specific problems.
So in other words what I’m proposing is that we start learning and thinking in systems, a more holistic and higher level approach, that will allow us to dedicate more time to the creative side of development rather than worrying about the technical aspects of programming…
I’m happy to hear what others think.
It's so soothing to hear this from you.. Thank you Mosh... Now I'm motivated to take coding seriously again
I used to think Jensen was wrong because in enterprise software development which is a very human process-mapped activity with many regulated and unremovable human checks and balances, that development lifecycle would never change. But I must say with GPT 4o now, I'm not too sure anymore. If you could include GPT 4o live in your R&D meetings - just imagine this - GPT 4o could immediately draw up prototypes on the spot when you discuss about it (and share it in the teams meetings - where business analysts can work in tandem to comment and correct the understanding if it was wrong), and if its inferencing capabilities lets it understand business and human processes and then have it design the ERD diagram, create the functional & tech specifications, generate a few UI/UX themes for humans to choose from, and upon approval by a project manager, generate the entire codebase according to the approved specs. We as coders might be toast. I think this is what Jensen is talking about. I think the "AI is a tool argument" might really be 99% AI and 1% human. The coder will be completely replaced, and the only human remaining in this loop will be the non-technical business analyst.
indeed. He said that the world will need people able to solve domain problems
I love you mosh! You taught me python years ago and now I am about to graduate with my cs degree. This video relieved a bunch of stress around ai
I was literally waiting for someone like you to speak on this Mosh.....Thank you so much
First of all he is a sales man.
A salesman that led a company to perfectly transition from gaming to workstations to cloud compute to web3 to AI? I'm sure he's "just" a salesman and the uploader of this channel who literally sells courses about programming totally isn't one🤣
@@nigel-uno He didn't say it wrong though, He is a sales man at first and then one who thinks analytically to guide the company, Guiding and doing stuff yourself has alot of difference in there bro.
@@Mr.Scopesike What was there to sell before Jensen led the team to create it? He's clearly not a salesman first.
as a senior developer in top 10 semiconductor company, i can say that our CIO sees AI as a tool to increase efficiency and he will not let AI do the critical decisions. A mistake in IT applications can cause millions of dollars is just a matter of hours.
you are just gold Mosh , thanks
Jensen Huang is talking about a future AGI, not talking about the current Narrow AI.
* off penis
Future agi is basically a few short yeard away. Yall are so naive
AGI = AI = Curve Fitting
What should that ai be based off? So far they have LLMs and that's it, so if there is nothing else on the horizon then there will be no AGI.
I’m too lazy to write any comments usually. But Node took a special place in my heart, it was my first commercial experience back in 2016-2019, and I miss working with Node sometimes.
Thanks for the assurance.
People - AI will never replace program developers.
Near future- AI brilliantly write frontend and backend code programs and comunicate with customer with a natural language.
what is AI? explain kiddo
I have 5 years of full-stack experience. I was shocked when heard what he said it. A few other AI experts were also so futuristic. But I will keep grinding! I feel the fear but being replaced does not make all the sense.
The only time humans won't need to learn coding is if the concept of computers ceased existence. Coding is also an art form in certain circles. There isn't a possibility of coding going away. Not to mention the big elephant in the room... Code is AI; AI is code
Thank You for this video. I’m just starting to learn coding and so far it’s going very well. Then I hear this particular CEOs say coding is a waste of time and AI will replace it. Now that I know this, I’m going to keep coding!😊
My brother told me I shouldn’t have my kids study language because they’re a technologies that can translate through earpieces now. Learning language develops your brain learning how to code develops your brain. It is a good exercise in the same way that lifting weights develops your muscles. What else are you going to do with your time Might as well better yourselves. Of course, in 100 years we could be back to the Stone Age and those language skills might kick in again. You don’t know what tomorrow brings even though you think you do do you think any of these businessman or the people on 9/11 that jumped out of those buildings and vision themselves in those situations Before hand? Today is great. Tomorrow is not guaranteed. I know guys who made them selves, millionaires, saving for retirement and died of cancer before they could retire. Today is grace tomorrow is not guaranteed.
Thank you so much Mosh
Well it depends, as a senior engineer, yeah, but junior devs who are looking to get hired... yeah, a lot of tech companies are shedding workers mostly because the senior devs can now do the work of 3 senior devs from before chatgpt, no need to have juniors anymore.
government should subsidize a few all humans devs companies, if only to keep coding skills still alive in the country, similar to how the US preserved part of it's manufacturing capabilities.
Thanks Mosh for this inspiring short
Coding is not dead. It's just become heavily abstracted by the early programmers. Ai as a tool being one of them.
But coding is dying for new devs, because it is getting exponentially more difficult to land a job. New tools everywhere and companies are expecting too much. Employeers need to realize that leetcode is dead. That is exactly what the bot is better at. And you can't fault new programmers for using a tool that was created by the early programmers themselves, for the purpose and sake of abstraction.
can you elaborate on this matter perhaps on a complete video? it would be nice to hear some real world examples that ai may come short, atleast for the near future.
AI comes short in everything. It sucks, all it can do is snippets. Its literally like saying 3D printing will replace construction workers. No, just no. You can 3D print a door handle yes but not an entire house.
The same goes for AI and code.
@@BRIANROSERhaha! Love your 3D printing metaphor! Spot on!
@@BRIANROSERI understand that it cannot perform on levels of designing a complete software on its own, what i was wondering is that in the near future perhaps 10 years from now, can AI evolve to join those snippets to actually design software? what are some factors that locks out ai to interfere multiple careers in software engineering? maybe creativity?
For me i think what it can't do yet is learn the full context of a project , like it can build you ui of a page and stuff but it can't fully develop and continuously innovate and update , design new solutions for your oroject thats why we still need humans
@@N1essohIt’s difficult to predict things in the future. Sometimes predictions are right but sometimes they are wrong.
We just have to remember that these predictions are not in our control. So, if by any chance, you are paralyzed by the fear of what the future holds just remember to take it day by day and focus on things you can control.
Bonus points if you can position yourself to understand and learn AI architecture, how to prompt engineer or other new tools you will have to learn to keep yourself competitive in the workforce.
such a positive and clear adhesive message, thanks
Dude, are you up to date with the latest AI development in code generation? It's not about just generating a simple code snippet anymore. AI is definitely gonna replace a lot of developers (i'm a dev myself).
To be fair, he’s saying it will replace coders in THE FUTURE.
How far in the future is open for debate, but it can definitely write good basic functions right now.
At the speed it’s moving, it might be able to write full scripts within a few years.
After that, full programs.
I think coders have a good 5 to 10yrs before having to be legitimately worried.
Programmers are in a lot of trouble.
Its amazing how naive the creator is. These models are getting better every day, if you cant see whats coming then you might deserve whats heading your way.
@@irql2 but you are aware it is going to apply to EVERYTHING, not only programmers, right?
Don't teach your children how to write, they can just dictate to a AI and it transform it in text.
"AI is a tool, not a replacement" thanks Mosh
What he said, developing software may not be the same as how we do now. In the future AI sits between software and developer. And code will not be the medium.
That is a much better argument. Still pretty sure the guy that knows how to code. He’s going to get the job just like the guy who drove horses became the chauffeur. The correct term for someone that pilots a car watercraft or aircraft is a pilot. Yet those who drive trucks and cars are referred to as drivers even though they never drove an animal. So don’t tell me the guy with the coding skills isn’t getting first dibs at that job.
@@SeanEustace-zk3mc fair enough
@@SeanEustace-zk3mcIt's the same argument, It's just that he actually thought it through and explained it. What you fail to understand is that what jobs remain are going to become a serious competition, because we will have a lot of capable people, but they will have to compete for fewer positions...
Very much agreed. Although I can't write a single line of code and Ai is bloody amazing, its still a complementary to human capacity and not yet an Agi to replace anything and everything
Thank you, Mosh!
Thanks for the motivation Mosh ❤
I really appreciate this reels. Thank you for giving courage for those who want to pursue careers in this IT field. 😍😍
he tries to say please don't stop buying my courses, everyone sells to you miserable guys
Love your take on this, mosh ❤
It's actually true. While AI won't entirely replace coders, it does make coding faster, leading to a reduced need for as many coders over time. Ultimately, this could result in a smaller coder workforce, in my opinion.
It also means that development will be less expensive for small companies, so they can start their development and that can lead to more work places for programmers
We will only see a more or less clear answer after the "AI bubble" pops and the dust settles. But having some experience in software development, I can definitely say that creating a working piece of even mildly complex software by writing a prompt is way less possible than some people seem to think it is.
Project Devin
@@chronometer9931 still not good enough to replace a proper developer for any moderately complex tasks. Whether it ever will be, and whether it will ever be widely adopted we'll know when the dust settles.
Last century they said the same about horses getting replaced with cars....you haven't understood Alan Turing's paper
That's not a great analogy is it.
I have been a software developer for several years but I left that to get a PhD with a focus on Machine Learning. Jensen Huang isn't completely wrong. AI is going to replace a lot of coding. Maybe not all coding but a majority of it. The part that will be left is the 10x programmer. And that doesn't mean hire 10 programmers. A 10x programmer can solve some problems that normal programmers don't have the capacity to solve (and you cannot learn that).
Probably one of the appropriate feedback to Jensen saying.
I thought, in truth, AI would provide a new kind of RAD tool. That is something that saves time and boilerplate, but doesn't replace a dev. AI could be harnessed into a dashboard; an AI assisted executive mgmt system. You could, in fact, replace a data analyst with this. Carve 100 analysts down to 10. Infiltrate a fast track into the backend that accesses the data warehouse. A dashboard that not only provides data, but helps a director make decisions and take action. Data analysts do use a lot of boilerplate. It's been done before, and the pipeline is heavy weighted and costly.
That is just a sales pitch. Learning coding directly competes which nvda products but doesn’t apply to every problem coding can solve.
"AI is a tool, not a replacement" say this to truckers and bus drivers in 10 years :>
more like 50, those industries and their dependencies are heavily regulated and therefore very slow to adapt to developments
@@RomeTWguy nope, its a big market, and it will not be the current car companies that will solve it, it will be nvida and such companies
@@RomeTWguyhave you heard of these people called lobbyists?
The legal complexities of the system actually stand a pretty good chance of keeping them employed, companies are too afraid to be held liable by self-driving mistakes.
This is my passion, i will keep going no matter what
Thank you, I really needed that
Never lose, Never choose too.
The full stack is insecure; BROKEN. The lower levels needs more laborers. Everything must be rebuilt. The workers are too few. Esp in the west
Take it easy people. Let me translate what Nvidia and Jensen meant: 1) shorter term, AI can do and potentially automate the technical work of coding but for now I don’t think the complicated problem solving and the logic related work to coding can be replaced (yet). For example language model eg Gpt-3 doesn’t understand purposes and structure of source codes yet 2) but tech companies are incentivized to replace high cost coding resources as practical when machine learning and AI will advance considerably in next 5 yrs or sooner.
Don't worry, in future, company no need to have a CEO. Because CEO job can be done by A.I. Just ask A.I about what future plan for a company. The A.I will answer for it. ✌🏻😁
On the flip side, he must know where the chip technology is heading. Just the way transformer models changed our content generation 24 months back, same must be in the hardware realm.
The point is not that AI will completely replace the programmers. The point is that AI will make programmers so efficient such that one person utilizing AI to build applications will be like 30x more productive than an average programmer of today's era.
Hence, instead of 30 folks, tech companies can choose to hire one skilled programmer who knows how to use AI as a copilot to code.
Of course there will be people always required to manage a software application. But the number of folks required to do the same job gets reduced drastically in a few years. That was what the Nvidia CEO meant
You don't need to learn assembly language which used to be in past, bcoz we have a whole environment for that nowadays. Same for some programming languages today.
You may be right. But also he can because as CEO he know potential about staff which are not shared publiclly or see potential super fast grow of potential in next years. But everything can be only guess.
Ai is a tool and its the efficiency that will replace some programers since less will likely be needed when the tool can write chunks of the programming and have the programmer revise it.
I absolutely couldn't agree more !!!!!!
Thank you for the words of wisdom a truth......
He's just a boomer.
Huang's argument:
"I wish young people a lot of suffering, because tenacity and resilience come with suffering."
Never would I wish my peers any suffering...
they should focus on making a.i the perfect teacher, tutor which can easily teach anyone even the most complex topics. it starts at the education level, imagine you had an a.i who can teach you human anatomy within weeks compared to years and make it stick. then you'd have enough professionals.
I see so many people using the calculator analogy and rightfully so. The main issue of this CEO's statement is its ignorance. If people stop learning to code then a huge gap will start to appear in our knowledge. If we surrender that to AI then what's next?
If we keep surrendering aspects of our lives to AI then eventually we will end up being a society where we are ruled by AI amd we just sit there and stagnate.
We as a species define ourselves by our progress. Progress is made through innovation. Take that away and what are we? Bumps on a log who do nothing.
I’m playing devil’s advocate. I think his statement is misinterpreted on an emotional level. He projected a reduced need for needing to learn code, but that’s not synonymous with what you actually are - problem solvers and engineers. A coding language is simply a way to get from problem to solution. It’s like a 1960s finance auditor with a briefcase full of calculators, formulas and spreadsheets which were needed to manipulate numbers. Now we have Excel. I don’t need to remember how to calculate 100 formulas to calculate things, Excel does it for me, so that I can do my job more efficiently. There will always be a need for people who can assess a problem and come up with a solution, but instead of writing the code yourself, you’ll have AI do it exponentially faster then tweak it as needed, through natural language until you get your desired solution.
That’s what i want to hear hats off to you bro
I've been a programmer for 2 years but, since this A.I revolution has ocurred i've gave up on learning programming for past few months
AI is definitely going to make significant upgrades on developing But i doesn't mean we won't need devs and software engineers anymore. Opposite. New technology needs new specialists to maintain and work with
I feel a lot more inspired now 🎉
Thank you Mosh
You should do it because it's fun. Building things is fun. Software is just one way of building things.
we've seen entire industries replaced or made obsolete by technological revolutions in the past, you'd be remiss to think programming is immune/resistant or that AI is not bringing about the next revolution. If AI was a figurative nuke on the jobs industry, programmers would be ground zero, id feel much safer in the trades but even thats only relative. programming will become purely a hobby in the not so distant future
You clearly Don't know what you are talking about, if A.I can solve complex real world programming problems no job in this world is Safe
@@zulkernainyead1933 you clearly dont know what youre talking about and you clearly read what you wanted to read not what I actually wrote, and then decided to manifest you delusions in a nonsense comment after arguing with the voices in your head about something no one was talking about except you.
anyway thanks for sharing your feelings 👍🏿
@@zulkernainyead1933WTF are you on lol
yeah, Jensen is not your friend, guys. He is a typical modern big-corpo CEO, thinking only about what kind of lies and bs he has to push, to get enough hype - for his bonus check and retirement benefits.
What he is saying is conceptually wrong (and there is a reason why he is pushing this to an audience that can`t even argue with him).
The main reason software development is quite a robust field - is because it is a field with a constant "work in progress" dynamics. It is a young field, with tons of stuff to improve.
Switching to AI would mean, that we are freezing ourselves in space and time, accepting the fact, that we stop improving, stop working on safety issues, stop optimizing, basically, that we say, that current codebase is some sort of golden standard and there is nothing left to do. Which is completely wild and absurd thing to say, for anyone, who is not hyping up his company`s stocks.
To advance, you need ppl who understand how it works under the hood.
Using AI with you human language communication, means that you are abstracting to the highest level possidle.
It means, that you giving up on literally every form of control and customization, and just hoping that you won`t need to change anything. It is a highest form of "copy-pasting" :D
Now, it is nothing new in programming, after all, we all use frameworks and libs, and compilers etc to abstract things - but it already comes with significant cost. And we already know, that the best products are made by ppl who , if needed, can avoid mindless abstraction and "coping", and go "deep" and customize things.
Your average Joe who uses pre-built website will never look under the hood to understand what is going on, and will have no idea on how to fix anything.
Same happens if AI gives you a code, that does not work. You literally have to learn to code, to fix it or to identify problem or dangerous practice being used there.
So, the moment you stop improving - AI starts to stagnate.
The moment you stop filling internet with terabytes of code with better solutions, with newer stuff, new patches and updates, AI will be frozen in time.
We're only 1 year into AI - just imagine what GPT-6 can do! As a professional software engineer of 10 yrs, I and many of my peers have changed industries due to layoffs and lack of jobs. If you want to stay, get a masters or doctorate in AI.
Calling him an ignorant is a big mouth i believe.
However programming can't die in my opinion but it will continuously evolve for improvements.
I'm afraid this is not a strong argument. You're opining on current AIs while he was talking about future advanced models. They will most certainly be a replacement in the future. As for qualifications, he is highly knowledgeable in AI and what he says on that topic matters a lot.
Thanks Mosh . Love you a lo
Thanks, i dropped out of learning coding and UX because the hype around AI is replacing that skills....
Thanks i will keep learning....!
I actually have another video about someone with the same story as you. It’s coming out next week. Don’t miss that!
Like calculators replaced manual calculation workers so will ai replace low level coding jobs. Only problem solving skills will remain valuable. Coding jobs will be more accessible to people in other more problem solving intensive fields like mathematics and physics and some other kinds of engineering hence resulting in great decline in coding specific skills but increase in demand for problem solving skills in general. There might remain no career with only coding specific skills. You should focus on problem solving more than learning about a programming language and terms associated with it.
And the most hillarious thing is, if you want to know the opinion of AI itself - I asked chat gpt if AI will replace software engineers and the answer was quite similar to this
There are several AIs it's not just one system...
That's the ostrich reflex right here.... Just look what Devin is doing today.... Multiple agents will definitely start taking some jobs over.
Yeah definitely ostrich reflex. Imagine yourself in their shoes and it is understandable, all those years they put in. I am sure a bunch of horse guys were the same with the advent of the automobile.
Devin is dogshit and while it might take a couple of super light entry level jobs, it's miles away from even removing a single software engineer.
Scaling, security, performable, legacy and more will never be close to as good via tools like Devin.
You can't use AI to create new systems when the AI is only taught precious knowledge.
The only one creator who stands for the truth of the work of the programmers👍
This video is my alarm clock everyday.
AI is going to replace programmers. Mosh is just trying to earn money till that time
Thanks for speaking fax,cause he is just trying to promote his ai and , that if people stop learning to code ,then they will stop developing and will make to depend on that ai for all
I trust you because you taught me JS and python, I just hope I break into this industry
Let’s see how this will age in 20 years or less…
There's so much cope in this comment section.
It seems you guys don't know Devin has entered the chat.
Go and see the demos, then have a rethink.
He never said it is a replacement, he said prompt engineers will replace coders...just saying.
I learned so much from this video. Thank you!
I almost give up but mosh words made stands strong, thank you mosh
I never liked AI at all. But we must face the fact it changed the style of living and working like no other technology so far in insane short period of time. And that's a terrified fact. AI should have stayed behind the door for special purposes, closed systems, military, police,... but not widely opened for everyone. Not just because someone will lose his job but it will dramatically change everything. And definitely will replace programmers more or less in the very near future. A man made a new being on the already destroyed planet. A man again plays the role of the God.
Was watching this while implementing a PIL based visiting card creator automated through an Excel reader,, Thanks mosh.