Mackie MR524 vs M-Audio BX5 D3 || 5 Track Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 4 авг 2024
  • Mackie on amazon DE: amzn.to/2xxPHe9
    Mackie on bhphotovideo: bhpho.to/2MCQVhU
    M-Audio on amazon DE: amzn.to/2OHwFsn
    M-Audio bhphotovideo: bhpho.to/2NzABus
    ------------------------
    All the tracks used in this video can be found here:
    • Test Tracks
    ----------------------------
    Sound recorded using Zoom H6 recorder. Levels matched using SPL meter. All tone controls set to neutral.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 32

  • @antoniov644
    @antoniov644 3 года назад +5

    I had an opportunity to listen at this monitors....M-Audio Graphite, KRK, JBL, Yamaha, Adam, Kali, Sterling... The Mackie's, this model... where the clear winners.... they had more accurate timbre, space, depth, lows and overall sound.... Great for mixing and multimedia use....

  • @kesamek8537
    @kesamek8537 4 года назад +12

    BX5 sounds much more like the original. Winner.

  • @endrizo
    @endrizo 5 лет назад +12

    Aaaah..thanks these are the 2 i am considering buying.
    Both are good, M audio is closest to original track what makes it a better studio monitor...but mackie sounds nicer and clearer...conclusion m audio is better tool for production and mackie is better suited for listening .. more pleasing for listening music movies games..everyday use..imho of course. Thanks for the video.

    • @atcing
      @atcing 5 лет назад +6

      Es cierto que los M-Audio suenan en el vídeo más parecidos a la pista original, pero hay que tener en cuenta que la grabadora empleada (Zoom H6) tiene unos mciros que captan los agudos realzados y los graves atenuados respecto a "lineal"... y es probable que sea la Mackie la que en realidad suena más lineal (aunque no sea así en el vídeo) :)
      I m sorry for not writing in English

    • @endrizo
      @endrizo 5 лет назад +5

      @@atcing bueno puede ser..pero eso k dices aplica a los dos ya k los dos son grabados x la misma grabadora asi k la comparacion es justa. Los microfonos podran colorear el sonido pero lo hacen para los dos. La diferencia es notoria. Vamos a escribir mas es español asi estos amigos aprenden español como hicos nosotros con el ingles...youtube es mundial y en el mundo hay muuuuchos mas idiomas k el ingles..saludos

    • @atcing
      @atcing 5 лет назад +3

      La grabadora es la misma y sin dudas la comparación en ese sentido es justa, pero por el motivo que he comentado los resultados podrían invertirse respecto a la realidad. Con una respuesta de cómo captan los micros de la Zoon H6 así:
      www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/960850-zoom-q3hd-h5-h6-x-y-mics.html
      escuchando el vídeo, creo que sería la Mackie la que más se acercara al sonido la pista original
      Da gusto encontrar a quien escribe en el mismo idioma :)

  • @pv9968
    @pv9968 4 года назад +7

    please test BX8 vs HS8 and MR824 vs HS8 and BX8 vs MR824

  • @gorenapbacsy9373
    @gorenapbacsy9373 5 лет назад +4

    Can you expand your tests with the monitor's self-noise? I bought a BX5 and It's a big self-noise, humm, hiss. You might to test with close microphones, and connect only power cable.

    • @OMPTraxxs
      @OMPTraxxs 3 года назад +1

      If you have noise it could be a ground loop ? Dont know if this is the correct name is but there are solutions for that problem.

  • @henrycoal2953
    @henrycoal2953 5 лет назад

    Can do a test mr524 vs lsr305? Thx

  • @StephanPluemer
    @StephanPluemer 3 года назад +3

    Ich bin immer wieder von meinen M-Audio BX5 D2 begeistert, sehr ehrlich aufspielend, hier hört sich die Mackie im Mitteltonbreich überspitz an, einige mögen das schön finden, ich finde das nervig ..

  • @pv9968
    @pv9968 3 года назад +1

    please test - BX8 D3 vs MR824

  • @iuliangogu6217
    @iuliangogu6217 3 года назад +2

    M-Audio BX5 D3 !!!

  • @gin21zkato
    @gin21zkato 2 года назад +1

    mackie sound is tight around in mid freq and boosted in high mid

  • @BorisBarroso
    @BorisBarroso 5 лет назад +5

    Mackie has an edge on highs and bass but I like m-audio in some songs, m-audio tends to be more flat but
    lacks bass.

    • @Klaus312
      @Klaus312 4 года назад +5

      Boris Barroso lacks Bass? They sound bassy to me?

  • @aztrack__5840
    @aztrack__5840 5 лет назад +5

    M audio 👍👍

  • @Kxybs
    @Kxybs 5 лет назад +2

    Still can't figure out which one to buy. I wanna use it mainly for music production (so as FLAT as possible with a decent low end) and everyday uses.
    Mackie MR524 (369.99$ CAD) or JBL 305 MKII (419.99$ CAD)
    Let me know!

    • @Kxybs
      @Kxybs 5 лет назад

      @NJ Random xd

    • @rsvp9816
      @rsvp9816 5 лет назад +1

      wait for black friday then make ur decision. the golden rule is, JBL for 5 inch, and Yamaha for 8 inch. you want full control You need the 8 inches.

    • @attilagal6672
      @attilagal6672 5 лет назад

      You must hear that Mackie is performing much nicer. Mostly on highs. Better balance.

  • @ledzep20
    @ledzep20 5 лет назад +1

    Who is the artist for "Long Drive"?

    • @sn0fx
      @sn0fx 5 лет назад

      In the description there is a playlist of all the test songs, Artist is listed there as Jeff Meegan.

  • @iWhy_Music
    @iWhy_Music Год назад

    in 720p for adding a mistery, due to lover quality of recording, for harder to compare)))

  • @KoniakCwalkPL
    @KoniakCwalkPL 3 года назад +3

    M-Audio BX4 vs M-Audio BX5 D3

  • @user-qt5hc3ze5w
    @user-qt5hc3ze5w 5 лет назад +10

    M Audio рулят👍, а у Mackie резкая выпирающая середина👎

  • @Shah20XX
    @Shah20XX 5 лет назад +5

    mackie is crispier
    listening on LSR305

  • @gabrield.cstoica1832
    @gabrield.cstoica1832 4 года назад +4

    m audio more better...good video.

    • @syntherwilll47
      @syntherwilll47 4 года назад +2

      What are you talking about, Mackie is way better at handling deep bass.

  • @MohamedMagdi790
    @MohamedMagdi790 3 года назад

    Close