You know, I'm an extremely casual Titanic history fan. But it only took me about 3 hours(ish) to browse through Wikipedia and a few other articles and Google pictures of the titanic before the disaster and the condition of it's wreck to get the general idea of the disaster and a basic rundown of the timeline, as well as some basic information on some of the key persons and what they did during the sinking, and what their fates were. After a few weeks, I was buying books on the subject and browsing through records of the British and American inquiries, as well as personal accounts of the survivors. All of this was rudimentary research. Apparently, the creators of this video didn't even do that, or couldn't be bothered to proofread their script, if they even used one, or do some basic fact checking. 30 seconds in and there are blatantly false pieces of information being dished out. This video is a shameful display of ignorance and ineptitude regarding the topic of Titanic's sinking, and I hope people continue to call these creators out on such poorly constructed videos.
5 minutes and the crew got 700 people off. It's a miracle they managed to save that many in a mere 5 minutes. Congratulations video producer you have given me everything I need to know!!!
That's impossible. Water couldn"t have flooded the first few compartments that fast. Maybe it could have submerged the first 6 compartments but wouldn't spill over the WTB's. (watertight bulkheads) Genuinely cannot believe people think this is even accurate
@@timbo12021 that dont matter right now. Titanic couldn't have sank in only 5 minutes. Yes, too much water was entering the ship to be pumped out, but the rate that the water was flooding at wouldn't have been enough to spill over the ship's bulkheads in 5 minutes. Genuinely can't believe you believe this clickbait video.
He gets a mention on this channel? Well there you go. No other reputable Titanic historian would ever be associated with this garbage. Aaron1912 is all that's left.
Even though some of the facts presented in the movie turned out to be false, James Cameron was serious...and you need to respect his work, because if it wasn't for that movie, interest toward the ship wouldn't be that strong.
This is just facts right here. Even though the sinking theory is out of date, I don't blame James Cameron because what other sinking theories were there besides the vbreak which is physically impossible and the 1995 sinking theory? Yes, there are more theories on how the Titanic sank, but those weren't a thing for sometime after the Titanic movie. Genuinely cannot believe people think this video is real.
This video is meant to be a joke, right??? Unless whoever made this video never did any actual research or read a single book or article about the Titanic…
there was a story that when the back split front the front and settled back on the water, survivors said it stayed there for several minutes, they believed it would stay afloat.
How did they get the time wrong, if the ship sank in 5 minutes there would be no or close to no survivors as 5 minutes isn’t enough time to get any boats away. Plus it was never debated how long the ship took to sink, even in 1912 they knew it took 2 hours and 40 minutes.
She did not split from a boiler explosion. Passengers would have definitely noticed, and not very long after the titanic struck the iceberg, crewman took immediate action to prevent a boiler explosion.
@@thekansan8683 When the ship hit the ice burg crewman imiditly shout down only forward section boiler rooms but untill vey last moment which she doomed ,the aft section's boiler room were continusly runing for genarate electricity and water pumps to throw away incoing water.Sudden bulked collaps could be happened and sudden water and hot boiler contact could be happened.This is my imagenary only.
@@shashediri544 When James Cameron did an expedition on the weck he found that the boilers mainly boilers 1 and 2 were not ripped into sherds or had any damage from such an explosion.
There is a wealth of knowledge out there about the Titanic and its sinking as well as many many videos on RUclips from people who know what they're talking. It's incredibly ridiculous that all of that gets ignored by you guys and you keep putting out videos that are completely full of inaccuracies. It's very obvious that you're only looking for views and have no desire to do any actual work to put out accurate and quality content. It's just lazy.
Follow the money. What was happening before the wreck? What happened just after? Who died in the wreck? Who didn't? How did this impact the development of central banking? How many other major incidents in history changed the development of central banking? Look into every place that the US put boots on the ground in the name of democracy, now ask the question. How does this impact the development of central banking?
This is how I think it sank and also according to google the titanic struck the iceberg the ship goes up at around 30 degree angle it snaps but still held by the double bottom and starts sinking ans the double bottom breaks another small bit snaps off leaving it in 3 pieces and the stern starts it final plunge (all the funnels did snap off but it would be to long if I added that)
9:16 LOL!!!! XD That joke? Never gets old. That project got cancelled so many times it's now just a joke. Not to mention that the dude behind that project is a lunatic who has extravagant projects just so he could have the spotlight. Did you know he also build a Jurassic Park on his golf course?
There was a slow burning fire in one of the coal bunkers, when discovered the Captain raced to use up the coal in the bunker. This fire weakened the bulk head where it broke and was ripped apart - it wasn't just an iceberg it was also a weakness in the bulk head. The fire may have been planned with hot coals being placed into the lower level of the coal bunker, which important VIPs were on the ship? What changed becauase those VIPs died? Who received the insurance pay out?
The fire causing weak steel was debunked and smouldering coal fires were very common. Ad for insurance Titanic was UNDER insured. There was nothing to gain by sinking her AND damage their reputation as a safe steamer company. Yeah no. Don't spread stuff that has been throughly debunked.
A coal fire wouldn't had weakened the hull, if anything, it would've strengthen the hull for awhile before it returns to it's original condition. And plus, coal fires were very common in the 19th and 20th Centuries aboard vessels.
You do realize that Titanic II was cancelled in like 4 years ago right? And the other Titanic has been abandoned and rusting in its spot since July last year.
This video and it's "theories" may have been plausible on the morning of April 15, 1912 before a true picture of the evens was put together but in 2022 this video doesn't seem so...bright😅
The V-break (from the middle) was proven that it could not have occured due to the physics involved. Anyone with a remote knowledge of physics can deduce that water came in the front of the shift via the front water tight compartments and filled. Gravity will pull the ship down and raise the rear as it does. Now as to whether the shipe broke in half while above the surface or while on its way down could be debated, I believe most of the interviews of survivors do mention the rear raising into the air and then settling again (due to the break).
Ah yes, the Titanic wreck has funnels on and are next to each other. Very true..... . .. . . . . . . NOT Even the animation looks like a 10 year old made. 2:20 what is wrong with the ship in that scene?!
Wow I didn't know that the Titanic sank in 5 minutes. Thanks Brightside for teaching me that you are literally incapable of making a video that has any sort of semblance of truth in it towards Titanic.
After watching a coupla Titanic movies, I was surprised that it sank so quickly. Did not seem that way in the movies. Was particularly touched that the orchestra continued playing on the deck. So sad for all those people. I liked the Barbara Stanwyck movie better. When it was decided that women and children would go to lifeboats first, a married lady who had been married to her husband for many years declined to board and said she would remain with her husband-so touching.
@@johnschwalb Yeah, after rewatching I was going by the time the ship had already began to sink. What a terrifying situation. They knew they were gonna die in the frigid waters.
7:49 no I’m not thing what your thinking specifically because you failed to mention the many parts that come off the Stern and that Titanic rises to a ridiculous angle that high out of the water
Didn't see a massive iceberg in time ,Too small a rudder and bulkheads only went half way up Full bulk heads and it wouldn't of sunk. And I know what I'm talking g about as I'm a city & Guilds qualified boat builder
The rudder was normal sized for a ship that sized. Bulkheads going all the way up wouldn't have made sense structurally. Even IF the bulkheads went all the way up, it's a matter of bouancy, she still would've sunk regardless
@@thekansan8683 and the Olympic was about the same size, virtually identical to her sister the Titanic and had a full career into the 30s so obviously the rudder isn't the problem
my version is the titanic going straight up in the air then it snaps into 2 then when it sinks straight up. :edit: it actually when to 55 degrees then snaped in the middle of the 3rd funnel
wrong wrong WRONG WRONG IT SANK LIKE THIS FIRST THE FUNNUL FALLS THE FIRST ONE THE THE SECOND ONE THE IT SNAPS BOOM THE BACK NEVER STARTED WHIT THE FRONT
2:15am Titanic strikes iceberg?
Historic Travels is going to have a huge field day over this video
i pointed that out
And he nearly fecken died
how is this so accurate LOL
Accuracy 100
Agree
You know, I'm an extremely casual Titanic history fan. But it only took me about 3 hours(ish) to browse through Wikipedia and a few other articles and Google pictures of the titanic before the disaster and the condition of it's wreck to get the general idea of the disaster and a basic rundown of the timeline, as well as some basic information on some of the key persons and what they did during the sinking, and what their fates were. After a few weeks, I was buying books on the subject and browsing through records of the British and American inquiries, as well as personal accounts of the survivors. All of this was rudimentary research.
Apparently, the creators of this video didn't even do that, or couldn't be bothered to proofread their script, if they even used one, or do some basic fact checking. 30 seconds in and there are blatantly false pieces of information being dished out.
This video is a shameful display of ignorance and ineptitude regarding the topic of Titanic's sinking, and I hope people continue to call these creators out on such poorly constructed videos.
You are big brain
@@NavlinskyGamin yeah he is
True
If anyone here watches my content would like me to review this video let me know.
Yes, please do
Yessss
I wanna see the rage and cringe
Sam, I'll donate some money to you for some aspirins on Friday
Duh Sam
0:25 ah yes, the ship hit the iceberg at 2:15 AM and sank in just 5 minutes, thank you Bright Side for this gift of knowledge
Yeah. This video loves accuracy.
If by 5 minutes they mean 2 hours and 40 minutes. Do some research, Bright Side
And those models, in one of them the funnels where all different, like they were AI generated
They lie about a lot of stuff
i like how everyone is talking about historic travels
Cuz he is leader of us all
@@stanisawstanczyk5526yessss
Titanic actually hit the iceberg at 11:40pm.
Hey guys, this video’s quality makes Pong look like a cinematic masterpiece.
More like a cinematic nightmare
This video killed almost all my braincells
2:14 and my eye TF is this model
What’s with the funnel-
Same as a titanic enthusiast this hurts even more
@@DisneyWish2023 same here I’m also an enthusiast lol
@@GomZilla1985 yeah but the funnel though lol so cursed
5 minutes and the crew got 700 people off. It's a miracle they managed to save that many in a mere 5 minutes. Congratulations video producer you have given me everything I need to know!!!
dude the titanic sank in 2 hours and 40 minutes. Titanic struck the iceberg at 11:40 pm. bright side really needs to get their facts right
That's impossible. Water couldn"t have flooded the first few compartments that fast. Maybe it could have submerged the first 6 compartments but wouldn't spill over the WTB's. (watertight bulkheads) Genuinely cannot believe people think this is even accurate
@@insertnewchannelnamehere you ever heard of sarcasm?
@@timbo12021 that dont matter right now. Titanic couldn't have sank in only 5 minutes. Yes, too much water was entering the ship to be pumped out, but the rate that the water was flooding at wouldn't have been enough to spill over the ship's bulkheads in 5 minutes. Genuinely can't believe you believe this clickbait video.
Have fun with this one Historic travels lol.
Only got past the first one
1. No theory states the titanic sank in 5 minutes
2. It could’ve sank in one piece, ever heard if capsizing
Why do I get the feeling that Bright Side is Aaron1912 in disguise?
“The starboard list eases”
Clearly shows ship listing to port
The amount of things they get wrong is funny
Animations? Yeah let’s not talk about this video ever again
Dear Bright Side,
Please stop making Titanic videos without doing research
Sincerely,
Every Titanic Historian that has ever existed
SO TRUE
Just stop doing videos. 😂
@@MrThebigcheese75 why I like making videos idc if 99.7% of the people that watch my channel arent subscribed.
Yes it took 5 mins for it to sink, very accurate
It took Titanic 2 hours and 40 minutes to sink
@@Ghoststryker65237 he's doing a figure of speech
@@Ghoststryker65237 dude is bc at 0:25 it like said it sank in 5 minutes if you do the math
No way Aaron 1912 got a mention
Aaron 1912 is not someone to take info from he is hardly a Titanic historian amateur or otherwise
@@sabrinastratton1991 Ik, that's why I'm supprised he got a mention
It’s a sign that you don’t expect much from either of these two
He gets a mention on this channel? Well there you go. No other reputable Titanic historian would ever be associated with this garbage. Aaron1912 is all that's left.
@@sabrinastratton1991 I agree fully, but hit Channel never should have been taken down. That was pure toxicity on the viewers.
James Cameron did allot of research to make his movie as accurate as possible
Fax!
Even though some of the facts presented in the movie turned out to be false, James Cameron was serious...and you need to respect his work, because if it wasn't for that movie, interest toward the ship wouldn't be that strong.
This is just facts right here. Even though the sinking theory is out of date, I don't blame James Cameron because what other sinking theories were there besides the vbreak which is physically impossible and the 1995 sinking theory? Yes, there are more theories on how the Titanic sank, but those weren't a thing for sometime after the Titanic movie. Genuinely cannot believe people think this video is real.
@@insertnewchannelnamehere I can't believe you thought I was being genuine and not sarcastic
I mean, he dramatised it to an extent. The stern wasn’t that far out of the water for one
For anyone reading this comment... *this video is full of inaccuracies from start to finish* and I really wish we could see the like to dislike ratio
You can. Just add the dislike extension for chrome.
This video is meant to be a joke, right??? Unless whoever made this video never did any actual research or read a single book or article about the Titanic…
Why does all the theory start at 2:15 am when titanic struck the berg at 11:40 pm
Because Bright slides initials don't stand for bright side.
@@johnschwalb wot
@@UNIQUEwastaken Their initials are BS. Don't u get it
there was a story that when the back split front the front and settled back on the water, survivors said it stayed there for several minutes, they believed it would stay afloat.
This is illegal to be this early to a bright side video😂
Same
I know right
It's not bc they make vids every 2 seconds
agreed
Same
Bro really said the titanic sank in 5 minutes 💀💀 0:25
This has to be the best animation quality on earth (I’m joking in case you though I was serious)
How did they get the time wrong, if the ship sank in 5 minutes there would be no or close to no survivors as 5 minutes isn’t enough time to get any boats away. Plus it was never debated how long the ship took to sink, even in 1912 they knew it took 2 hours and 40 minutes.
There was a theory that the boilers fell forward and smashed a huge hole in the hull. It was mentioned in the novel "raise the titanic!"
8:58 what
I have a new theory. When cold water contact with a hot boiler, a sudden explosion could happen.The explosion could cause for breaking Titanic.
She did not split from a boiler explosion. Passengers would have definitely noticed, and not very long after the titanic struck the iceberg, crewman took immediate action to prevent a boiler explosion.
@@thekansan8683 When the ship hit the ice burg crewman imiditly shout down only forward section boiler rooms but untill vey last moment which she doomed ,the aft section's boiler room were continusly runing for genarate electricity and water pumps to throw away incoing water.Sudden bulked collaps could be happened and sudden water and hot boiler contact could be happened.This is my imagenary only.
@@shashediri544 When James Cameron did an expedition on the weck he found that the boilers mainly boilers 1 and 2 were not ripped into sherds or had any damage from such an explosion.
No
Then again he can’t spell iceberg immediately incoming correctly
This video quality makes my videos look like hollywood movies.
As someone who I'd call an expert and love titanic THIS... THIS video pains me alot
Bright Side did you just copy my Titanic sinking video thumbnail!?!???
Yes but made it look terrible 😂
yeah but they have the titanic sinking backwards
Second time!
0p
There is a wealth of knowledge out there about the Titanic and its sinking as well as many many videos on RUclips from people who know what they're talking. It's incredibly ridiculous that all of that gets ignored by you guys and you keep putting out videos that are completely full of inaccuracies. It's very obvious that you're only looking for views and have no desire to do any actual work to put out accurate and quality content. It's just lazy.
this channel didn't clearly research about the Titanic at all
Fr fr
Follow the money. What was happening before the wreck? What happened just after? Who died in the wreck? Who didn't? How did this impact the development of central banking? How many other major incidents in history changed the development of central banking? Look into every place that the US put boots on the ground in the name of democracy, now ask the question. How does this impact the development of central banking?
🙄 that is the stupidest thing I've heard and has nothing to do with Titanic
@@sabrinastratton1991 To be fair, the 'Titanic was sunk by a German U-boat' runs it close!
I have a headache after looking at those models
This is all inacurate like it says high angle then breakup happens when water reached the bridge IM ALSO HAVING A MIGRAINE LIKE HISTORIC TRAVLES
This is how I think it sank and also according to google the titanic struck the iceberg the ship goes up at around 30 degree angle it snaps but still held by the double bottom and starts sinking ans the double bottom breaks another small bit snaps off leaving it in 3 pieces and the stern starts it final plunge (all the funnels did snap off but it would be to long if I added that)
9:16 LOL!!!! XD That joke? Never gets old. That project got cancelled so many times it's now just a joke. Not to mention that the dude behind that project is a lunatic who has extravagant projects just so he could have the spotlight. Did you know he also build a Jurassic Park on his golf course?
2:14 look at the funnels😂
There was a slow burning fire in one of the coal bunkers, when discovered the Captain raced to use up the coal in the bunker. This fire weakened the bulk head where it broke and was ripped apart - it wasn't just an iceberg it was also a weakness in the bulk head. The fire may have been planned with hot coals being placed into the lower level of the coal bunker, which important VIPs were on the ship? What changed becauase those VIPs died? Who received the insurance pay out?
no 😢😂😂😂😮😮😮😮🎉🎉🎉
The fire causing weak steel was debunked and smouldering coal fires were very common. Ad for insurance Titanic was UNDER insured. There was nothing to gain by sinking her AND damage their reputation as a safe steamer company. Yeah no. Don't spread stuff that has been throughly debunked.
As someone who has been a Titanic enthusiast since 2015, this is painfully incorrect.
No REEEEEE!
A coal fire wouldn't had weakened the hull, if anything, it would've strengthen the hull for awhile before it returns to it's original condition. And plus, coal fires were very common in the 19th and 20th Centuries aboard vessels.
WHY DOES THIS EXIST
0:55 I’m having a seizure understanding this sentence
that's completely right there's a new Titanic replica coming out pretty soon but I don't when
They cancelled it so many times. I doubt it ever comes out
You do realize that Titanic II was cancelled in like 4 years ago right? And the other Titanic has been abandoned and rusting in its spot since July last year.
True
It dident take 5 minutes for it to sink, it took 10 minutes for it to sink
BRIGHT SIDE'S VIDEOS ARE ON A TOTALLY DIFFERENT LEVEL THAN ANY OTHER CREATOR
Ikr
If you want to lose brain cells, be my guest
True, Bright Sides videos are differnt then
other creator. Bright side's video
is very very bad and losing brain cells.
@@rafiqstarline Facts my friend
If by level you mean the Mariana Trench, then yeah.
at the video point 0:28 the titanic nameplate is backwards for some reason
This video and it's "theories" may have been plausible on the morning of April 15, 1912 before a true picture of the evens was put together but in 2022 this video doesn't seem so...bright😅
@HistoricTravels reaction to this almost makes this mess of a video worthwhile!
What is this Titanic model what happened to the funnels
Hi
The V-break (from the middle) was proven that it could not have occured due to the physics involved. Anyone with a remote knowledge of physics can deduce that water came in the front of the shift via the front water tight compartments and filled. Gravity will pull the ship down and raise the rear as it does. Now as to whether the shipe broke in half while above the surface or while on its way down could be debated, I believe most of the interviews of survivors do mention the rear raising into the air and then settling again (due to the break).
I Like All The Titanic Breakup Theories From 1985-2023
It's now 56 ° in out refrigerator
Ah yes, the Titanic wreck has funnels on and
are next to each other. Very true.....
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
NOT
Even the animation looks like
a 10 year old made.
2:20 what is wrong with the ship
in that scene?!
4:29 great model
Wow I didn't know that the Titanic sank in 5 minutes. Thanks Brightside for teaching me that you are literally incapable of making a video that has any sort of semblance of truth in it towards Titanic.
Tell me the recipe of the herb that you used
Hi please answer me bright side
Why do you want someone who spreads lies and misstruthes to notice you?
Titanic hits Iceberg at 11:40 pm
Only took 4 minutes for the notice to come through.
The crookedness of the breaking model is so annoying
u might have the right theory bro
This clip reflect the quality of this Channel
After watching a coupla Titanic movies, I was surprised that it sank so quickly. Did not seem that way in the movies. Was particularly touched that the orchestra continued playing on the deck. So sad for all those people. I liked the Barbara Stanwyck movie better.
When it was decided that women and children would go to lifeboats first, a married lady who had been married to her husband for many years declined to board and said she would remain with her husband-so touching.
2 hours seems like a long time but I'm reality 2 hours goes by in a blink
I wouldn't say 2 hours from hit to break up quickly, so many ships sink in minutes not hours.
@@johnschwalb Yeah, after rewatching I was going by the time the ship had already began to sink. What a terrifying situation. They knew they were gonna die in the frigid waters.
Very wrong bright side
Titanic broke in half according to documentaries
7:49 no I’m not thing what your thinking specifically because you failed to mention the many parts that come off the Stern and that Titanic rises to a ridiculous angle that high out of the water
That one piece theory made me lose my brain cells...
Apparently it took Titanic to sink in Five mins😭
*brain cells die*
"The largest ship ever built"
At this point you know that Bright Side did no research for this video
Bro this video does the same amount of research a group of 5th graders do. Little to none
LOL THE HULL IS SPLIT AND THE NAME PLATE IS BACKWARDS. THATS “TOTALLY” WHAT THE TITANIC LOOKS LIKE. 0:59
6:56 *model dies*
The Titanic struck the iceberg at 2:15 AM? Yup. I’m outta here.
Most normal youtube kids animation
Hello there
No
Some Details of This Whole Video
Is Untrue
Watch Carefully Even The Generated clips
bro 3 pipes
Funnels*
3:17 Whatever credibility you guys had got snapped away.
And that's being generous.
I might be too early
This is so bad my braincells were reduced to ATOMS,THE DRAWING IS YOUR CREATION
I can't see the James Cameron one in the movie because it broke up when there was only two funnls left!?.
Too much testosterone sunk the Titanic 😂
BAHAHA
"double bottom" 💀💀💀 Edit: at 3:18 it says Vbrake instead of V-Break lol
BRAINCELLS IS GONE.
the Titanics in the thumbnail are flipped.
Didn't see a massive iceberg in time ,Too small a rudder and bulkheads only went half way up Full bulk heads and it wouldn't of sunk. And I know what I'm talking g about as I'm a city & Guilds qualified boat builder
The rudder was normal sized for a ship that sized. Bulkheads going all the way up wouldn't have made sense structurally. Even IF the bulkheads went all the way up, it's a matter of bouancy, she still would've sunk regardless
For the time, the titanic has a sufficiently sized rudder. Titanic could actually maneuver quite well for a ship of it's size.
@@thekansan8683 and the Olympic was about the same size, virtually identical to her sister the Titanic and had a full career into the 30s so obviously the rudder isn't the problem
@@sabrinastratton1991 She was even agile enough to ram a U-boat in WW1.
THIS IS NOT JAMES CAMERON THEORY THE STERN FALL IN THE OCEAN AND THEN REACH 90 DEGREES
my version is the titanic going straight up in the air then it snaps into 2 then when it sinks straight up. :edit: it actually when to 55 degrees then snaped in the middle of the 3rd funnel
Bright side you knew that the titanic sunk in about 2 hrs 40 mins why are you saying the titanic sunk for 5 mins here?
ah yes i remember when propellers could be seen
This is impossible for the ship sink in 5 minutes because no life boats would been launched and everyone died right there.
8:04 the funnels were messed up
I don't care how many theories out there. The 1995 theory is always right, to me.
exept it has been proven wrong multiple times?
its not. It doesn’t matter if its your opinion, its still incorrect
@@Bluemantopvids I d o n ' t c a r e
@@alecleo3434 but you should, because even cameron disprooved it
Me coming into this: time to torture myself
Me coming into this: time to warn people and get them out of the bright side of life
wrong wrong WRONG WRONG IT SANK LIKE THIS FIRST THE FUNNUL FALLS THE FIRST ONE THE THE SECOND ONE THE IT SNAPS BOOM THE BACK NEVER STARTED WHIT THE FRONT
wyh aer you wiyeing to my fase